category int64 1 70 | source_thread_id int64 8 26k | thread_id int64 8 26k | thread_title stringlengths 12 234 | thread_slug stringlengths 5 229 | post_id int64 11 63.6k | post_number int64 1 44 | user_id int64 -1 14.8k | username stringlengths 3 20 | name stringlengths 1 111 ⌀ | created_at stringdate 2018-02-16 08:44:58 2025-10-31 00:04:30 | updated_at stringdate 2018-02-17 03:42:31 2025-10-31 00:41:55 | cooked stringlengths 23 39.2k ⌀ | reply_to_post_number float64 1 41 ⌀ | reply_count int64 0 14 | quote_count int64 0 7 | reads int64 1 1.24k | score float64 0.2 446k | trust_level int64 0 4 | moderator bool 2
classes | admin bool 2
classes | staff bool 2
classes | like_count int64 0 68 | hidden bool 1
class | deleted_at float64 | post_url stringlengths 15 239 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
61 | 11,955 | 11,955 | Ephemery project: An ephemeral testnet | ephemery-project-an-ephemeral-testnet | 31,562 | 1 | 2,562 | remyroy | Rémy Roy | 2022-11-30T22:35:51.030Z | 2022-11-30T22:35:51.030Z | <p><strong>Ephemery</strong> is a new Ethereum testnet project with the goal of creating a testnet that is ephemeral and that resets every few days or weeks. Our goal is to create a testnet that is well suited for testing a staking setup before going on Mainnet but also for any use case that does not need long-lived an... | null | 0 | 0 | 35 | 8,502 | 1 | false | false | false | 5 | false | null | /t/ephemery-project-an-ephemeral-testnet/11955/1 |
61 | 11,955 | 11,955 | Ephemery project: An ephemeral testnet | ephemery-project-an-ephemeral-testnet | 34,549 | 2 | 2,562 | remyroy | Rémy Roy | 2023-02-28T01:05:21.579Z | 2023-02-28T01:05:21.579Z | <p>The main repository for this is on <a href="https://github.com/taxmeifyoucan/ephemeral-testnet" class="inline-onebox" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">GitHub - taxmeifyoucan/ephemeral-testnet: Resources and project management of Ethereum ephemeral testnet</a></p> | null | 0 | 0 | 20 | 54 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/ephemery-project-an-ephemeral-testnet/11955/2 |
61 | 3,335 | 3,335 | BlockQuick - Secure super light client for Ethereum | blockquick-secure-super-light-client-for-ethereum | 11,010 | 1 | 1,545 | dominic | Dominic Letz | 2019-05-31T04:32:35.749Z | 2024-08-02T11:42:20.622Z | <p>We released our research results earlier this week. A new super light client protocol, decentralized and eclipse resistant. Needing just 20kb to sync to Ethereum.</p>
<p>Here is the paper: <a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/579" class="inline-onebox" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">BlockQuick: Super-Light Client Prot... | null | 0 | 0 | 37 | 582.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 8 | false | null | /t/blockquick-secure-super-light-client-for-ethereum/3335/1 |
61 | 1,902 | 1,902 | Latent ERC-725 moral contradiction? | latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction | 5,665 | 1 | 888 | ravachol70 | Ravachol | 2018-11-14T05:11:42.661Z | 2018-11-26T01:56:22.182Z | <p>I feel that ‘nifties’ have become bum-rushed nonsense. As the later standards now derived from ERC-721 are showing, there’s so much potential once we get past the naming convention.</p>
<p>In any case, that’s not necessarily my topic. I would just like to promote this ideological conflux which I’ve come across; it r... | null | 0 | 0 | 47 | 174.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction/1902/1 |
61 | 1,902 | 1,902 | Latent ERC-725 moral contradiction? | latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction | 5,669 | 2 | 888 | ravachol70 | Ravachol | 2018-11-14T08:12:18.432Z | 2018-11-14T08:12:18.432Z | <p>Amicus Plato amicus Aristoteles magis amica verita.</p> | null | 0 | 0 | 43 | 18.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction/1902/2 |
61 | 1,902 | 1,902 | Latent ERC-725 moral contradiction? | latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction | 5,974 | 4 | 888 | ravachol70 | Ravachol | 2018-11-27T01:07:13.274Z | 2018-11-27T16:46:50.655Z | <p>While perhaps not a literal translation, I believe the point that I’m trying to demonstrate is something akin to what is being displayed in the following article:</p>
<p><a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/unintended-consequences-and-goodharts-law-68d60a94705c" class="onebox" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofoll... | null | 0 | 0 | 23 | 14.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction/1902/4 |
61 | 1,902 | 1,902 | Latent ERC-725 moral contradiction? | latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction | 6,767 | 5 | 888 | ravachol70 | Ravachol | 2018-12-19T18:23:38.720Z | 2018-12-20T16:21:22.702Z | <p>I’d put a nickel on it if we might continue with some admissions to philosophy. With this in mind, I’d like to put forward the Sebeok/Bateson concept of information – more specifically, meta-information (inference even). I don’t mean to throw up the existence of a neological under-current, however: there is a defini... | null | 0 | 0 | 14 | 7.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction/1902/5 |
61 | 1,902 | 1,902 | Latent ERC-725 moral contradiction? | latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction | 6,805 | 6 | 888 | ravachol70 | Ravachol | 2018-12-20T16:30:19.142Z | 2018-12-20T16:30:19.142Z | <p><code>_qual continendos exemplum pertinebat ad <id>?_</code></p> | null | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/latent-erc-725-moral-contradiction/1902/6 |
61 | 5,030 | 5,030 | Things we really want smart contracts to implement (or not) | things-we-really-want-smart-contracts-to-implement-or-not | 15,936 | 1 | 1 | jpitts | Jeth Pitts | 2020-12-14T20:14:45.311Z | 2020-12-14T20:14:45.311Z | <p>I saw a couple of Tweets from Dan Robinson and thought it was a good idea to try to get people to contribute more. This is “best practices coming from the frustrations of developers and data consumers”.</p>
<p><strong>Smart contract systems which make building a local state / database possible from events.</strong><... | null | 0 | 0 | 17 | 133.4 | 2 | true | true | true | 0 | false | null | /t/things-we-really-want-smart-contracts-to-implement-or-not/5030/1 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 41,669 | 1 | 6,714 | stoicdev0 | Steven Pineda | 2023-10-25T20:21:10.692Z | 2024-08-02T11:52:57.083Z | <h2><a name="we-are-proposing-a-token-holder-extension-for-nfts-1" class="anchor" href="#we-are-proposing-a-token-holder-extension-for-nfts-1"></a>We are proposing a token holder extension for NFTs.</h2>
<h2><a name="eip-7590-title-erc-20-holder-extension-for-nfts-description-extension-to-allow-nfts-to-receive-and-tran... | null | 0 | 0 | 23 | 534.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/1 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 41,754 | 2 | 6,961 | CASABECI | CASA11 | 2023-10-27T09:30:10.905Z | 2023-10-27T09:30:10.905Z | <p>Hello,</p>
<p>How can I help or How can be forward this opportunity?</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for the support.</p>
<p>Kindly regards,</p>
<p>Juan David</p> | null | 1 | 0 | 18 | 23.6 | 0 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/2 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 41,761 | 3 | 6,714 | stoicdev0 | Steven Pineda | 2023-10-27T11:08:44.025Z | 2023-10-27T11:08:44.025Z | <p>It would be great if you shared your thoughts on Pull vs Push for 721s and 1155s, and on Granular vs Generic.<br>
Also, if you have any suggestions on the proposed methods or events</p> | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 13.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/3 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 45,415 | 4 | 10,323 | 0xASK | Austin King | 2024-02-05T15:22:34.746Z | 2024-02-05T15:22:34.746Z | <p>Hey appreciate the post</p>
<p>Can you help me understand the specific pros / cons of the above proposal as you see it in relation to token bound accounts enabled by 6551?</p> | null | 1 | 0 | 15 | 13 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/4 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 45,416 | 5 | 6,714 | stoicdev0 | Steven Pineda | 2024-02-05T15:28:19.962Z | 2024-02-05T15:28:19.962Z | <p>Sure!</p>
<p>Pros of 6551:</p>
<ul>
<li>It is wider, not only meant to accept ERC-20s but other stuff too</li>
<li>Backwards compatible, works with existing collections.</li>
</ul>
<p>Pros of 7590:</p>
<ul>
<li>It is very simple, focused only a specific funcionality.</li>
<li>You do not need to care about registries... | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/5 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 45,427 | 6 | 3,252 | dievardump | Simon Fremaux | 2024-02-05T20:41:26.840Z | 2024-02-05T20:41:26.840Z | <p>I don’t think it’s needed. 6551 is way more fitted to add balance holding for an NFT, whatever your usecase is.<br>
I would rather see a publicly available implementation of a 6551-compatible contract that allows only to receive and send ERC20s. Public good, retroactive, less open to errors when calculating balances... | null | 1 | 0 | 14 | 32.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/6 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 46,265 | 9 | 6,714 | stoicdev0 | Steven Pineda | 2024-02-29T17:42:05.249Z | 2024-03-08T13:20:33.041Z | <p>What you mention of 6551 solving this problem better is an opinion. There are use cases where this is just simpler.</p>
<p>Regarding the ERC20s with tax on transfer, this was a great catch, thanks! I have added the needed checks on the example implementation and on security considerations as well.</p>
<p>Edit: I ori... | 6 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 6.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/9 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 46,434 | 10 | 3,252 | dievardump | Simon Fremaux | 2024-03-07T15:20:59.407Z | 2024-03-07T15:26:28.156Z | <aside class="quote no-group quote-modified" data-username="stoicdev0" data-post="9" data-topic="16260">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/stoicdev0/48/7697_2.png" class="avatar"... | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 16.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/10 |
61 | 16,260 | 16,260 | Token Holder Extension for NFTs | token-holder-extension-for-nfts | 46,462 | 11 | 6,714 | stoicdev0 | Steven Pineda | 2024-03-08T13:21:06.196Z | 2024-03-08T13:21:06.196Z | <p>Good point, I corrected my previous comment. My point on simplicity stands.</p> | 10 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/token-holder-extension-for-nfts/16260/11 |
61 | 14,989 | 14,989 | Proposal to allow arbitrary ENV vars per tx | proposal-to-allow-arbitrary-env-vars-per-tx | 38,952 | 1 | 8,237 | blakewest | Blake | 2023-07-07T22:41:13.191Z | 2023-07-10T17:31:20.936Z | <p>Hey all, Blake West here. I’m the cofounder and CTO of Goldfinch (<a href="https://goldfinch.finance" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">https://goldfinch.finance</a>).</p>
<p>For a while I’ve been interested in the idea of smart contracts being able to set environment variables that would be accessible by other smart cont... | null | 0 | 0 | 15 | 78 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/proposal-to-allow-arbitrary-env-vars-per-tx/14989/1 |
61 | 14,989 | 14,989 | Proposal to allow arbitrary ENV vars per tx | proposal-to-allow-arbitrary-env-vars-per-tx | 38,956 | 2 | 8,237 | blakewest | Blake | 2023-07-08T01:28:43.145Z | 2023-07-08T01:30:08.838Z | <p>I’ll also add that this proposal is very adjacent to <a href="https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1153-transient-storage-opcodes/553">Transient Storage</a>, which is going into Cancun. I <a href="https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1153-transient-storage-opcodes/553/121">actually asked</a> about this general idea ... | null | 0 | 0 | 11 | 27.2 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/proposal-to-allow-arbitrary-env-vars-per-tx/14989/2 |
61 | 8,330 | 8,330 | Expandable Onchain SVG Images Storage Structure | expandable-onchain-svg-images-storage-structure | 23,402 | 1 | 4,717 | Soohan-Park | Soohan Park | 2022-02-16T10:11:00.411Z | 2024-08-02T11:53:18.502Z | <p>Hey, Ethereum Magicians <img src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/images/emoji/twitter/sparkles.png?v=12" title=":sparkles:" class="emoji" alt=":sparkles:" loading="lazy" width="20" height="20"><img src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/images/emoji/twitter/unicorn.png?v=12" title=":unicorn:" class="emoji" alt=":unicor... | null | 0 | 0 | 20 | 1,369 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/expandable-onchain-svg-images-storage-structure/8330/1 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,123 | 1 | 2,232 | uri | Uri Klarman | 2021-07-31T06:06:58.024Z | 2021-07-31T06:06:58.024Z | <p>During the PEEPandEIP discussion today on the gas limit, <span class="mention">@vitalikbuterin</span> suggested that moving to long-form might be valuable for more complete arguments.<br>
Below is a short summary of the discussion (H/T <a class="mention" href="/u/poojaranjan">@poojaranjan</a>!), and what I see as th... | null | 1 | 0 | 60 | 1,072 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/1 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,140 | 2 | 1,101 | vbuterin | Vbuterin | 2021-07-31T23:46:21.256Z | 2021-07-31T23:46:21.256Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="uri" data-post="1" data-topic="6753">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/u/439d5e/48.png" class="avatar"> uri:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>If tom... | null | 1 | 1 | 47 | 94.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 4 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/2 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,164 | 3 | 2,232 | uri | Uri Klarman | 2021-08-02T20:44:40.038Z | 2021-08-02T20:44:40.038Z | <blockquote>
<p>the extreme tail of the distribution does not reflect on the mean</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But Peter is anything but the extreme, at least in the public eye. He is the loudest voice in the community when it comes to the gas limit, and to many he represents “what core devs think” (regardless if that’s true o... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 12.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/3 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,367 | 4 | 1,332 | poojaranjan | Pooja Ranjan | 2021-08-13T11:59:07.413Z | 2021-08-13T11:59:07.413Z | <p>Recording of the conversation on Block gas limit with <a class="mention" href="/u/vbuterin">@vbuterin</a></p><div class="youtube-onebox lazy-video-container" data-video-id="vJNO_UqcH6A" data-video-title="PEEPanEIP #42: Block gas limit with Vitalik Buterin" data-video-start-time="" data-provider-name="youtube">
<a ... | null | 1 | 0 | 29 | 30.8 | 2 | true | false | true | 1 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/4 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,368 | 5 | 837 | kladkogex | Stan Kladko | 2021-08-13T12:58:59.668Z | 2021-08-13T13:10:12.554Z | <p>I do not understand the general argument that Peter makes about the general health of the network being affected by block size.</p>
<p>Anything can run faster if computers become faster and networks become faster.</p>
<p>I personally think that fears of ETH becoming too centralized if higher block limit forces peopl... | 4 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 26 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/5 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,525 | 6 | 1,514 | shamatar | Alexander | 2021-08-23T18:24:29.763Z | 2021-08-23T18:24:29.763Z | <p>I think that we encounter a usual twitter problem where there are a lot of opinions and heated argument, but without any material to support the case or help people to make an educated choice on a subject.</p>
<p>Let’s try to make some assumptions and analyze the current state of affairs. Some of these assumptions m... | null | 0 | 0 | 24 | 44.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/6 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,547 | 7 | 3,605 | norswap | null | 2021-08-25T13:57:56.621Z | 2021-08-25T13:57:56.621Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="kladkogex" data-post="5" data-topic="6753">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/kladkogex/48/8349_2.png" class="avatar"> kladkogex:</di... | 5 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 13.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/7 |
61 | 6,753 | 6,753 | Who, what and why decides the gas limit? | who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit | 20,554 | 8 | 1,514 | shamatar | Alexander | 2021-08-25T16:41:07.350Z | 2021-08-25T16:41:07.350Z | <p><a href="https://ethereum-magicians.org/u/norswap">norswap</a> may be I should have made it explicit, but div vs mul example there is to demonstrate that block gas limit is not anywhere close to an indication of validation complexity as a lot of gas may be just “wasted” for something that e.g. doesn’t take so much C... | null | 0 | 0 | 14 | 7.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/who-what-and-why-decides-the-gas-limit/6753/8 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,260 | 1 | 4,366 | q9f | Afr Schoe | 2022-10-25T10:55:53.776Z | 2022-11-01T11:04:39.563Z | <p>Good morning.</p>
<p>After the Merge and Devcon lying behind us, it’s time to address the Goerli testnet Ether supply issue.</p>
<p>Problem statement:</p>
<ul>
<li>Goerli only has 115M GoETH total supply
<ul>
<li>Goerli is the only/main testnet for testing validator setups</li>
<li>Circa 80-90% of the total supply i... | null | 0 | 0 | 141 | 14,793.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 10 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/1 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,267 | 2 | 752 | greg | Gregthegreek | 2022-10-25T16:56:42.073Z | 2022-10-25T16:56:42.073Z | <p>Thanks for kicking this off, will help however possible!</p> | null | 0 | 0 | 115 | 203 | 2 | false | false | false | 6 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/2 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,324 | 3 | 1,239 | wmitsuda | Willian Mitsuda | 2022-10-26T17:57:01.198Z | 2022-10-26T17:57:01.198Z | <p>Replicating what I had already suggested on twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/wmitsuda/status/1582624228213657601" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/wmitsuda/status/1582624228213657601</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Keep deprecating and bootstraping new goerli and sepolia in alternate years to educate peo... | null | 0 | 0 | 107 | 271.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/3 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,326 | 4 | 826 | chrishobcroft | Chris Hobcroft | 2022-10-26T20:06:56.145Z | 2022-10-26T20:41:20.773Z | <p>Some thinking was done around solving for Görli’s “empty faucet” problem (amongst others) as part of the <a href="https://devpost.com/software/holesovice-testnet" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">Holešovice</a> project at ETHPrague in June 2022 (winner of “Sustainability” prize).</p>
<p>The concept of “ephemeral” testnet... | null | 0 | 0 | 100 | 635 | 2 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/4 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,337 | 5 | 2,562 | remyroy | Rémy Roy | 2022-10-27T03:26:32.056Z | 2022-10-27T03:26:32.056Z | <p>EthStaker implemented a solution suggested by potuz to distributing Goerli ETH for the purpose of doing your validator deposit to stake on Goerli. That solution enables anyone to stake using a 0.0001 Goerli ETH deposit instead of the regular 32 Goerli ETH. It uses a combination of a Discord bot, a custom launchpad a... | null | 1 | 0 | 79 | 125.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 4 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/5 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,339 | 6 | 3,088 | taxmeifyoucan | Mário Havel | 2022-10-27T06:58:42.871Z | 2022-10-27T06:59:12.961Z | <p>The idea of an ephemeral testnet for stakers came up recently during discussions at Devcon. I agree with points brought up by <a class="mention" href="/u/chrishobcroft">@chrishobcroft</a> and find it as a feasible solution.<br>
More details in my recent proposal: <a href="https://notes.ethereum.org/@mario-havel/stak... | null | 0 | 0 | 77 | 60.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/6 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,344 | 7 | 4,366 | q9f | Afr Schoe | 2022-10-27T12:16:59.796Z | 2022-10-27T12:17:59.737Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="remyroy" data-post="5" data-topic="11453">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/remyroy/48/14377_2.png" class="avatar"> remyroy:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>... | 5 | 0 | 1 | 77 | 160.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 5 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/7 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,419 | 8 | 2,509 | yorickdowne | Yorickdowne | 2022-10-28T13:30:51.693Z | 2022-10-28T13:45:04.457Z | <p>I think I understand now why there’s GöETH demand. Protocols like zkSync bridge GöETH over to L2, where they can be used to mint NFTs like the recent zkApe.</p>
<p>This means that whichever network is the long-running dApp testnet will always be pathological with regards to its token use: It’ll always have some valu... | null | 0 | 0 | 66 | 533.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/8 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,437 | 9 | 6,630 | SnapCrackle2383 | Snap Crackle2383 | 2022-10-29T06:50:49.715Z | 2022-10-29T06:50:49.715Z | <p>Great to see this being discussed. Remy’s solution is good.I’m also in favour of restarting the testnet regularly.</p>
<p>We could approach it another way and every wallet gets 32goerlieth when created so from a user perspective they don’t have to hunting for it to test their validator setup.</p> | null | 0 | 0 | 57 | 81.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/9 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,462 | 10 | 2,562 | remyroy | Rémy Roy | 2022-10-31T03:27:56.551Z | 2022-10-31T03:27:56.551Z | <p>Fundamentally, testnet ETH has utility. It is useful in the sense that it can be used to perform work and it can be used to store data. The main way to keep it <em>free</em> is to have an unlimited supply or keep this perception that it is unlimited. Any friction in trying to obtain testnet ETH for any reason will c... | null | 0 | 0 | 61 | 287.2 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/10 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,541 | 12 | 4,366 | q9f | Afr Schoe | 2022-11-01T17:54:09.803Z | 2022-11-01T17:54:09.803Z | <p>Meeting minutes are on Github:</p>
<aside class="onebox githubissue" data-onebox-src="https://github.com/eth-clients/goerli/issues/129#issuecomment-1298896603">
<header class="source">
<a href="https://github.com/eth-clients/goerli/issues/129#issuecomment-1298896603" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow u... | null | 0 | 0 | 64 | 212.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/12 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,542 | 13 | 4,366 | q9f | Afr Schoe | 2022-11-01T17:55:44.085Z | 2022-11-01T17:55:44.085Z | <p>Two immidiate action items are:</p>
<aside class="onebox githubissue" data-onebox-src="https://github.com/eth-clients/goerli/issues/135">
<header class="source">
<a href="https://github.com/eth-clients/goerli/issues/135" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">github.com/eth-clients/goerli</a>
</heade... | null | 0 | 0 | 49 | 199.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/13 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,570 | 15 | 6,672 | pk910 | pk910 | 2022-11-02T15:36:21.513Z | 2022-11-02T15:36:21.513Z | <p>“faucets work fine, what’s actually rendering the network unusable is literally 100% of substantial goerli supply being hoarded instead of sent to faucets.”</p>
<p>That’s right. It cannot be prevented when distributing funds freely at the same time.<br>
There will always be people that hoard these funds for personal... | 14 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 54.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/15 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,572 | 17 | 6,672 | pk910 | pk910 | 2022-11-02T15:59:55.300Z | 2022-11-02T16:01:00.862Z | <p>I think you’re underestimating the numbers a little bit <img src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/images/emoji/twitter/wink.png?v=12" title=":wink:" class="emoji" alt=":wink:" loading="lazy" width="20" height="20"><br>
My faucet currently distributes 2000 GoETH every day - and it’s still a very low amount everyone ge... | 16 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 9.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/17 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,591 | 20 | 6,672 | pk910 | pk910 | 2022-11-03T14:24:39.213Z | 2022-11-03T14:24:39.213Z | <p>You’re underestimating the numbers again.</p>
<p>I’m just talking for my own faucet (not looking into other wallets):<br>
Testnet eth sent to my faucet since this workgroup was started 9days ago: 17,18 GoETH<br>
Testnet eth sent to my faucet in 2022 total: 351000 GoETH<br>
I can give you an export of the numbers if ... | 19 | 1 | 0 | 47 | 464.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/20 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,602 | 21 | 6,648 | lizc | null | 2022-11-03T18:37:09.011Z | 2022-11-23T07:49:55.507Z | <p>(post deleted by author)</p> | 20 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 13 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/21 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,700 | 25 | 6,719 | sole12343 | sole | 2022-11-07T02:59:36.351Z | 2022-11-09T08:14:34.187Z | <p>hi , we are faucet-dao team.</p>
<p>We try a new type of faucet, we call it a POT faucet , proof of trade. Let me show why we are important.</p>
<p>firstly, the penalty for malicious behavior by the pos network is the confiscation of tokens , on the goelri network, that’s goerli eth . If goerli eth is worthless, the... | null | 1 | 0 | 43 | 23.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/25 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,877 | 26 | 4,780 | Pandapip1 | null | 2022-11-11T00:41:32.720Z | 2022-11-11T00:41:32.720Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="sole12343" data-post="25" data-topic="11453">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/sole12343/48/7705_2.png" class="avatar"> sole12343:</... | 25 | 1 | 1 | 41 | 13.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/26 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,879 | 27 | 6,719 | sole12343 | sole | 2022-11-11T02:12:27.053Z | 2022-11-11T02:12:27.053Z | <p>We faucet-dao, hope that all users can add their excess goerli eth to the pool, so that everyone can get goerli eth more cheaper.</p>
<p>We bought all our goerli eth from others, we never attacked the faucet to get goerli eth in bulk, I think those people are at the heart of the current goerli eth problem.</p> | 26 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 83.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/27 |
61 | 11,453 | 11,453 | Testnet workgroup: Paths out of the Goerli supply mess | testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess | 30,882 | 28 | 6,719 | sole12343 | sole | 2022-11-11T03:06:49.320Z | 2022-11-11T03:06:49.320Z | <p>If the official team does what we do, then it is easy to let users go to sepolia for application testing and let those users who participate in the consensus layer have the motivation to be an honest verifier, because he can withdraw test coins and even gain income in the future.large-scale projects can also enjoy t... | 27 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 18.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/testnet-workgroup-paths-out-of-the-goerli-supply-mess/11453/28 |
61 | 3,123 | 3,123 | A cross-protocol, cross-implementation standard for server capacity management and flow control | a-cross-protocol-cross-implementation-standard-for-server-capacity-management-and-flow-control | 10,126 | 1 | 1,044 | FrankSzendzielarz | Frank Szendzielarz | 2019-04-12T13:58:08.580Z | 2024-08-02T11:42:20.341Z | <p>After reviewing PIP and LES flow control mechanisms and new proposals for managing server capacity, and after discussions with <a class="mention" href="/u/zsfelfoldi">@zsfelfoldi</a>, I realized a number of things:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The flow control mechanisms are essentially token bucket rate limiters, primarily aim... | null | 0 | 0 | 27 | 160.4 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/a-cross-protocol-cross-implementation-standard-for-server-capacity-management-and-flow-control/3123/1 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 38 | 1 | 1 | jpitts | Jeth Pitts | 2018-02-20T06:50:52.149Z | 2018-02-20T08:42:08.914Z | <p>Let’s get to know the current EIP process (as documented in EIP-1):</p>
<p><strong><a href="https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1.md">EIP-1: Purpose and guidelines for Ethereum Improvement Proposals</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>EIP Rational</strong></p>
<p>We intend EIPs to be the primary mechanisms... | null | 2 | 0 | 74 | 1,739.8 | 2 | true | true | true | 3 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/1 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 41 | 2 | 18 | AlexeyAkhunov | Ledgerwatch | 2018-02-21T19:36:04.513Z | 2018-02-21T19:36:04.513Z | <p>Nick Johnson has been tweeting about IETF process, maybe something can be taken from there: <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282.txt" rel="nofollow noopener">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282.txt</a></p> | null | 2 | 0 | 62 | 67.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/2 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 42 | 3 | 1 | jpitts | Jeth Pitts | 2018-02-21T20:59:39.125Z | 2018-02-21T20:59:39.125Z | <p>I think a lot can be learned from the IETF in terms of process, particularly from the notion of “rough consensus”. <a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282.txt">On Consensus and Humming in the IETF</a> by Pete Resnick (which you have referenced) shows how seriously they take effective decision-making.</p>
<p>... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 52.2 | 2 | true | true | true | 2 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/3 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 50 | 4 | 1 | jpitts | Jeth Pitts | 2018-02-25T02:20:10.058Z | 2018-02-25T02:20:10.058Z | <p>Nick Johnson <a class="mention" href="/u/arachnid">@Arachnid</a> recently posted a <a href="https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/898#issuecomment-367942142">comment on EIP-898</a> that describes current operating process really well. His description illustrates how the de-facto process is different from the proce... | null | 0 | 0 | 54 | 25.8 | 2 | true | true | true | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/4 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 59 | 5 | 25 | tjayrush | Thomas Jay Rush | 2018-03-02T16:47:02.098Z | 2018-03-02T16:47:44.088Z | <p>I’ll start. Each item in the above list (with the exception of item 2) has a pretty clear group of participants: (1) someone…, (3) an EIP editor, (4) someone…, (5) core devs, (6) core devs (implicit), (7) miners, (8) miners. Item (2) has ‘interested participants’ which is ill-defined.</p>
<p>The primary concern, if ... | null | 2 | 0 | 47 | 79.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 3 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/5 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 63 | 6 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T18:33:14.621Z | 2018-03-02T18:33:14.621Z | <p>I think the problem lies in <span class="hashtag">#2</span> first and foremost. Debating until consensus is reached. It’s not a great model for a few reasons, 1) no explicit time constraints on debate, and 2) no explicit definition of consensus.</p>
<p>Also <span class="hashtag">#5</span> “if the participants agree…... | 5 | 1 | 0 | 48 | 24.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/6 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 65 | 7 | 19 | Arachnid | Nick Johnson | 2018-03-02T19:04:18.690Z | 2018-03-02T19:04:18.690Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="tjayrush" data-post="5" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/tjayrush/48/23_2.png" class="avatar"> tjayrush:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>I’l... | 5 | 1 | 2 | 44 | 228.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/7 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 66 | 8 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T19:08:57.813Z | 2018-03-02T19:08:57.813Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="Arachnid" data-post="7" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/arachnid/48/18_2.png" class="avatar"> Arachnid:</div>
<blo... | 7 | 2 | 1 | 40 | 28 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/8 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 67 | 9 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T19:13:43.640Z | 2018-03-02T19:13:43.640Z | <p>Actually I’m wondering if the open debate / initial social consensus guage should be occurring before an EIP is even submitted. Or some sort of agreement on what classes of changes are even allowable for EIP submission (thin line here since that requires a definition for classes of changes which itself would require... | 8 | 1 | 0 | 37 | 22.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/9 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 68 | 10 | 19 | Arachnid | Nick Johnson | 2018-03-02T19:49:42.058Z | 2018-03-02T19:49:42.058Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="CryptoHokie" data-post="8" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/919ad9/48.png" class="avatar"> CryptoHokie:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>Yes, bu... | 8 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 23 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/10 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 69 | 11 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T20:01:38.105Z | 2018-03-02T20:01:38.105Z | <p>So why not do away with any sort of social debate if the developers are ultimately the gate keepers anyway?</p>
<p>I also don’t get what you’re saying up top about there being technical consensus but clients not wanting to implement. If it reaches the defined consensus point for acceptance, and they disagree with it... | 10 | 2 | 0 | 36 | 27.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/11 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 70 | 12 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T20:02:54.663Z | 2018-03-02T20:02:54.663Z | <p>And that’s ok. But it needs to be made clear up front. EIP-1 does not make that clear enough in my opinion.</p> | 11 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 16.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/12 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 72 | 13 | 19 | Arachnid | Nick Johnson | 2018-03-02T21:22:17.008Z | 2018-03-02T21:22:17.008Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="CryptoHokie" data-post="11" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/919ad9/48.png" class="avatar"> CryptoHokie:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>So why... | 11 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 27.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/13 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 74 | 14 | 28 | CryptoHokie | null | 2018-03-02T21:34:28.883Z | 2018-03-02T21:52:10.667Z | <p>I think I see what you’re saying, regarding the clients not updating/implementing, effectively refusing the change. I guess I was talking about before it even comes to that. The “social consensus” between the community and the devs (versus technical or on chain). Getting from the open debate about a change to the st... | 13 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 97.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/14 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 76 | 15 | 3 | MicahZoltu | Micah Zoltu | 2018-03-02T23:42:34.427Z | 2018-03-02T23:42:56.539Z | <p>Really the way the governance process works is a series of vetos. None of the vetos stop the process from moving forward, but a group exercising their veto power makes it significantly harder for the process to move forward for others.</p>
<ol>
<li>First veto is the EIP editors, who can choose to not merge an EIP i... | 14 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 262.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 5 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/15 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 78 | 16 | 19 | Arachnid | Nick Johnson | 2018-03-03T07:50:19.803Z | 2018-03-03T07:50:19.803Z | <p>This is an excellent description of the process. I agree.</p>
<p>Does anyone else think we need an “I’m only an EIP” infographic/comic/animation to explain the whole process? <img src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/images/emoji/twitter/wink.png?v=9" title=":wink:" class="emoji" alt=":wink:"></p> | 15 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 222 | 2 | false | false | false | 5 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/16 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 83 | 17 | 4 | jamesray1 | James Ray | 2018-03-04T05:09:50.370Z | 2018-03-04T05:09:50.370Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="jpitts" data-post="1" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/jpitts/48/15152_2.png" class="avatar"> jpitts:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>Once a... | null | 0 | 1 | 32 | 16.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/17 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 84 | 18 | 4 | jamesray1 | James Ray | 2018-03-04T05:12:25.994Z | 2018-03-04T05:12:25.994Z | <aside class="quote no-group" data-username="jpitts" data-post="1" data-topic="33">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/jpitts/48/15152_2.png" class="avatar"> jpitts:</div>
<blockquote>
<p>What b... | null | 0 | 1 | 33 | 31.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/18 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 85 | 19 | 4 | jamesray1 | James Ray | 2018-03-04T07:41:57.628Z | 2018-03-04T07:41:57.628Z | <p><a href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282.txt" rel="nofollow noopener">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7282.txt</a> is worth reading. It raises an interesting governance process that could be applied beyond technical systems: eliminating objections or discarding a proposal if the objection can’t be technical... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 787.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 3 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/19 |
61 | 33 | 33 | Reviewing the current EIP process | reviewing-the-current-eip-process | 101 | 20 | 34 | fulldecent | William Entriken | 2018-03-10T03:49:17.049Z | 2018-03-10T03:49:17.049Z | <p>Hello, I’m Will Entriken. I wrote/championed the latest two EIP drafts that got merged, and have been involved a little in the Solidity project.</p>
<p>How can I help here? And what will a win look like for the Magicians project?</p>
<p>FYI, I am here representing myself, not part of any organization and I haven’t f... | null | 0 | 0 | 32 | 16.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/reviewing-the-current-eip-process/33/20 |
61 | 11,382 | 11,382 | Idea: (Soul-Bound) Tokens with Verifiable Issuer | idea-soul-bound-tokens-with-verifiable-issuer | 30,086 | 1 | 6,484 | KevinYum | kevinyum.eth | 2022-10-19T05:01:44.300Z | 2024-08-02T11:52:53.691Z | <h1><a name="motivation-1" class="anchor" href="#motivation-1"></a>Motivation</h1>
<p>The current interfaces or implementations of ERC tokens (ERC-20/721/1155) don’t include “issuer” as a part of its standard, the underlying value of tokens relies on implicit community consensus. Think of the fact you can copy & pa... | null | 0 | 0 | 21 | 159.2 | 1 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/idea-soul-bound-tokens-with-verifiable-issuer/11382/1 |
61 | 11,382 | 11,382 | Idea: (Soul-Bound) Tokens with Verifiable Issuer | idea-soul-bound-tokens-with-verifiable-issuer | 30,087 | 2 | 879 | TimDaub | Tim Daubenschütz | 2022-10-19T05:48:45.405Z | 2022-10-19T05:48:45.405Z | <p>With my client’s projects for music NFTs we’re having the same issue. We want to know who issued which NFT but e.g. reading the Transfer’s <code>from</code> field doesn’t yield authentic information, so technically each transaction receipt has to be downloaded additionally. And then finally, event information isn’t ... | null | 0 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/idea-soul-bound-tokens-with-verifiable-issuer/11382/2 |
61 | 694 | 694 | How the Ethereum community could begin making meaningful signaling-based decisions | how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions | 1,937 | 1 | 1 | jpitts | Jeth Pitts | 2018-07-10T16:46:54.181Z | 2018-08-30T17:19:09.471Z | <blockquote>
<p>The issue is that it is incredibly difficult to coordinate large, diverse groups in order to produce compelling signals. In the absence of clear aggregate signals only the most prestigious voices or the voices which are able to most effectively astro-turf social media are heard.<br>
…<br>
Regardless of ... | null | 0 | 0 | 32 | 226.4 | 2 | true | true | true | 6 | false | null | /t/how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions/694/1 |
61 | 694 | 694 | How the Ethereum community could begin making meaningful signaling-based decisions | how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions | 1,959 | 2 | 69 | fubuloubu | null | 2018-07-12T00:23:45.956Z | 2018-07-12T00:23:45.956Z | <p>Great article and very important topic.</p>
<p>Acknowledging your subgroup I think is very important to interpreting your signal. I like the idea of organizing by opt-in subgroups for voting purposes.</p> | null | 0 | 0 | 29 | 25.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions/694/2 |
61 | 694 | 694 | How the Ethereum community could begin making meaningful signaling-based decisions | how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions | 3,223 | 3 | 657 | Jackdurose | Jack du Rose | 2018-08-17T15:04:42.374Z | 2018-08-17T15:04:42.374Z | <p>This is I guess a bit old now, but I’ll weigh in anyway.</p>
<p>Signaling by coinvote is one of the worst ideas being promulgated in the space. Not only are token holdings an incredibly poor proxy for the expertise of the voter, but the very fact of conducting an open vote with a running tally to provide a signal bi... | null | 1 | 0 | 20 | 14 | 0 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions/694/3 |
61 | 694 | 694 | How the Ethereum community could begin making meaningful signaling-based decisions | how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions | 3,227 | 4 | 226 | Ethernian | Ethernian | 2018-08-17T16:17:54.550Z | 2018-08-17T16:18:05.241Z | <p><a class="mention" href="/u/jackdurose">@Jackdurose</a> , thank you for picking the topic once again.</p>
<aside class="quote no-group quote-modified" data-username="Jackdurose" data-post="3" data-topic="694">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" sr... | 3 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 8.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/how-the-ethereum-community-could-begin-making-meaningful-signaling-based-decisions/694/4 |
61 | 18,415 | 18,415 | Ethereum High-Risk Transaction Surveillance Guidelines | ethereum-high-risk-transaction-surveillance-guidelines | 45,293 | 1 | 10,385 | Flyme10086 | Flyme10086 | 2024-01-31T06:36:44.564Z | 2024-02-13T16:19:39.971Z | <p>This ERC proposes a standardized framework for identifying, monitoring, and regulating high-risk transactions on the Ethereum network. The framework includes a set of criteria and a procedural approach for classifying transactions as high-risk based on factors such as transaction amount, frequency, associated addres... | null | 0 | 0 | 25 | 420 | 0 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/ethereum-high-risk-transaction-surveillance-guidelines/18415/1 |
61 | 18,415 | 18,415 | Ethereum High-Risk Transaction Surveillance Guidelines | ethereum-high-risk-transaction-surveillance-guidelines | 45,423 | 2 | 6,613 | CHANCE | CHANCE | 2024-02-05T18:38:18.341Z | 2024-02-05T18:38:18.341Z | <p>This has to be a joke or spam, but I am going to respond in good faith. Not only does this not have a specification or even establish a standard, the outlined methods make no logical sense.</p>
<p>Writing a huge list of addresses is not feasible for anyone regardless the precise mechanism. Addresses can be spun up i... | null | 0 | 0 | 20 | 59 | 2 | false | false | false | 3 | false | null | /t/ethereum-high-risk-transaction-surveillance-guidelines/18415/2 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,726 | 1 | 14 | lrettig | Lane Rettig | 2019-03-01T15:32:11.127Z | 2019-03-01T15:32:11.127Z | <p>Copying over some ideas that <a class="mention" href="/u/alexeyakhunov">@AlexeyAkhunov</a> shared on the <a href="https://github.com/ethereum/pm/issues/82#issuecomment-468637885" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">recent all core devs meeting agenda</a> of ways that we can make the EIP process better and more efficient for... | null | 0 | 0 | 39 | 482.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 6 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/1 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,734 | 2 | 1,324 | timbeiko | Tim Beiko | 2019-03-01T18:37:55.912Z | 2019-03-01T18:37:55.912Z | <p>+1.</p>
<p>One thing that had been mentioned before was to have an explicit “Security” component to<br>
EIPs. I’m no expert on what such a component would need to include, but it seems that a thorough analysis of the security considerations of EIPs would help avoid future ConstantiNOPEs.</p> | null | 1 | 0 | 30 | 61 | 4 | false | false | false | 3 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/2 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,736 | 3 | 994 | shemnon | Danno Ferrin | 2019-03-01T19:04:45.827Z | 2019-03-01T19:04:45.827Z | <p>For point (4) I think we need EIP authors to signal Istanbul intent now, and have reviewable EIPs by mid-April so we can do a reject/accept by mid May. My informal reckoning (based on AllCoreDev calls) is that we have intent from</p>
<ul>
<li>EIP-615 (subroutines/static jumps in EVM),</li>
<li>EIP-1057 (ProgPOW) an... | null | 2 | 0 | 32 | 36.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/3 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,738 | 4 | 1,324 | timbeiko | Tim Beiko | 2019-03-01T19:05:59.276Z | 2019-03-01T19:05:59.276Z | <p>Related: <a href="https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1559-fee-market-change-for-eth-1-0-chain/2783">one just did</a>.</p> | 3 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 56.4 | 4 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/4 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,740 | 5 | 994 | shemnon | Danno Ferrin | 2019-03-01T19:07:51.548Z | 2019-03-01T19:07:51.548Z | <p>Are they targeting Istanbul? That’s unclear in that text which is why I think we need a formal place/way to get “on the list.”</p> | 4 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 46.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 2 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/5 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,741 | 6 | 1,448 | econoar | Eric Conner | 2019-03-01T19:22:47.557Z | 2019-03-01T19:22:47.557Z | <p>I would like it to be but was unaware of the procedure to signal that. I can edit the post if you’d like it to be included.</p> | 5 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 26.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/6 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,744 | 7 | 994 | shemnon | Danno Ferrin | 2019-03-01T19:46:28.970Z | 2019-03-01T19:46:28.970Z | <p>I think that is the crux of the issue, how do EIP authors/advocates signal? If you edit your post to say something to the effect of “I’de like this in Istanbul” that is as good as we can do for now.</p>
<p>Possibly an “official” FEM thread with the top post maintaining a running list would be a better step, but tha... | null | 0 | 0 | 29 | 25.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/7 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,791 | 8 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-03-02T14:17:05.760Z | 2019-03-02T14:17:05.760Z | <p>Yes. I proposed a security review period:</p>
<aside class="quote quote-modified" data-post="1" data-topic="2721">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/boris/48/68_2.pn... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 9.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/8 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,792 | 9 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-03-02T14:23:23.935Z | 2019-03-02T14:23:23.935Z | <p>Yeah these should really be signalling.</p>
<p>I have two ways of doing this. One is that anyone can edit the Ethereum wiki roadmap <a href="https://en.ethereum.wiki/roadmap/istanbul" rel="nofollow noopener">https://en.ethereum.wiki/roadmap/istanbul</a></p>
<p>The other, is that there should be PRs to EIP-1679.</p>
... | 3 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 29.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/9 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,793 | 10 | 994 | shemnon | Danno Ferrin | 2019-03-02T15:52:43.762Z | 2019-03-02T15:52:43.762Z | <p>The signaling process is useful to both the EIP author as well as the client implementors. A month or two lead time on what work may be needed could affect current non-hard-fork work, so we can include schedule time as well as design space for the features.</p> | 9 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 23.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/10 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,807 | 11 | 69 | fubuloubu | null | 2019-03-02T19:48:37.346Z | 2019-03-02T19:54:05.173Z | <p>Definitely an advocate for a wider review process (number 3). I wrote something up and implemented a PR a against the EIP process.</p>
<p>Proposal: <a href="https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/proposal-add-ring-tags-to-eips-solicit-comments-from-ring-s/1592" class="inline-onebox">Proposal: Add Ring tags to EIPs; solici... | null | 0 | 0 | 19 | 8.8 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/11 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,808 | 12 | 69 | fubuloubu | null | 2019-03-02T19:50:20.047Z | 2019-03-02T19:50:20.047Z | <p>Number 1 sounds very similar to this:</p><aside class="quote quote-modified" data-post="1" data-topic="2389">
<div class="title">
<div class="quote-controls"></div>
<img loading="lazy" alt="" width="24" height="24" src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/user_avatar/ethereum-magicians.org/expede/48/4738_2.png"... | null | 0 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/12 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,809 | 13 | 69 | fubuloubu | null | 2019-03-02T19:53:49.940Z | 2019-03-02T19:53:49.940Z | <p>Definitely like the concept of 2. There has to be some optimal trade-off between hard fork coordination and release cycles. I’m willing to bet it’s less than 9 months.</p>
<p>We could improve things by cycling the release manager through each hard fork, so that this job doesn’t become a taxing thing on a person’s ti... | null | 1 | 0 | 20 | 29 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/13 |
61 | 2,781 | 2,781 | Higher standards for EIPs | higher-standards-for-eips | 8,818 | 14 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-03-03T11:07:52.312Z | 2019-03-03T11:07:52.312Z | <p>Ideally there is overlap: with 9 months, realistically you have a 12 month cycle. Three months out from the hard fork you can kick off next hard fork timing and planning.</p>
<p>And also at least two people - I can handle EIP feedback and timing, but not the technical coordination of testnets & the actual hardfo... | 13 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 8.2 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/higher-standards-for-eips/2781/14 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,585 | 1 | 1,609 | jorydotcom | jorydotcom | 2019-05-02T14:14:51.379Z | 2019-05-02T14:14:51.379Z | <p><em>Note: because I’m still a new account on the forum I’ve had to break this post up to comply with the “no more than two links” policy for new users - sorry for the weird formatting!</em></p>
<p>First, many thanks to those of you who have reached out to share your feedback and get more information. It is <em>extre... | null | 0 | 0 | 28 | 230.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/1 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,587 | 2 | 1,609 | jorydotcom | jorydotcom | 2019-05-02T14:15:14.926Z | 2019-05-02T14:15:14.926Z | <h3>Next Steps & Action Items</h3>
<p>We have several next steps which we are going to try to get done before setting another PGB call (which will ideally be in a couple of weeks):</p>
<ol>
<li>Everyone to read the <a href="https://github.com/oasis-open-projects/documentation/blob/master/board-docs/open-projects-ru... | null | 1 | 0 | 28 | 40.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/2 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,591 | 3 | 77 | virgil | Virgil Griffith | 2019-05-02T15:55:16.439Z | 2019-05-02T15:55:16.439Z | <p>Can you specify the current list of PGB representatives? It would be helpful to our names and faces to the roles.</p> | null | 1 | 0 | 23 | 29.6 | 2 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/3 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,592 | 4 | 1,609 | jorydotcom | jorydotcom | 2019-05-02T16:07:32.545Z | 2019-05-02T16:07:32.545Z | <p>Ah yes, good idea! The initial PGB members we have are: Charles Nevile (EEA), Nick Johnson (Ethereum Foundation, EIP editor), Jim Jaglieski (Consensys) and Virgil Griffith (Ethereum Foundation).</p>
<p>It should be noted that we expect this list of names to grow soon to include more magicians/community members.</p> | 3 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 14.6 | 1 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/4 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,609 | 6 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-05-03T04:00:16.090Z | 2019-05-03T04:00:16.090Z | <p>There is no individual that “represents” this forum. Just individuals who collaborate using the forum and collect around the concept of EthMagicians. Perhaps “Ethereum Community” is a better alternative wording / way of thinking about this.</p>
<p>Maybe Ethereum Project could also be replaced with Ethereum Community... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 13.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/6 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,610 | 7 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-05-03T04:02:34.419Z | 2019-05-03T04:02:34.419Z | <p>This is a suggestion brought forward by Virgil that he has kicked off to explore. Jory presented at Core Devs Berlin <a href="https://en.ethereum.wiki/eth1/coredevsberlin#oasis-open-projects-for-eip-standards-management" rel="nofollow noopener">https://en.ethereum.wiki/eth1/coredevsberlin#oasis-open-projects-for-eip... | 5 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 13.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/7 |
61 | 3,232 | 3,232 | OASIS / Ethereum Open Project Update | oasis-ethereum-open-project-update | 10,611 | 8 | 80 | boris | Boris Mann | 2019-05-03T04:03:40.200Z | 2019-05-03T04:03:40.200Z | <p>Can you expand on PGB vs TSC and process? Knowing the members is interesting. What they do is more important.</p> | 4 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 8.4 | 2 | false | false | false | 0 | false | null | /t/oasis-ethereum-open-project-update/3232/8 |
61 | 9,027 | 9,027 | Standards for a consent token | standards-for-a-consent-token | 24,851 | 1 | 3,985 | EricForgy | Eric Forgy | 2022-04-23T18:49:39.098Z | 2024-08-02T11:53:19.084Z | <p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>I did a cursory search and didn’t find a discussion on this topic, but if I missed anything, references would be appreciated <img src="https://ethereum-magicians.org/images/emoji/twitter/pray.png?v=12" title=":pray:" class="emoji" alt=":pray:" loading="lazy" width="20" height="20"></p>
<p>I was i... | null | 0 | 0 | 39 | 167.8 | 1 | false | false | false | 1 | false | null | /t/standards-for-a-consent-token/9027/1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.