Upload 75 files

2ba23bf2b09948ce9e2f7edf08cf3bd8/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime urban environment with low visibility conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road that curves slightly to the right. the surrounding area appears to be a commercial district with various establishments visible, including what looks like a gas station on the right side with an "76" logo. there are palm trees lining the road, and some streetlights provide minimal illumination. the road surface shows signs of wear with visible cracks. traffic appears light, with no vehicles directly ahead of the ego car. the overall atmosphere is dark due to the nighttime setting, creating challenging visibility conditions for driving.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a person standing on the left side of the road near the curb. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.95, -18.4], this person is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this is a stop sign located on the right side of the road at the intersection. based on the relative 3d coordinates[16.35, -18.4], it is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection where a stop sign (object 2) is clearly visible on the right side. the person (object 1) appears to be standing on the left side of the road, possibly near the curb. 
+
+the ego vehicle should come to a complete stop at the stop sign before proceeding through the intersection. however, the person on the left side of the road may not be fully aware of the vehicle's presence or intentions. if the person suddenly steps into the roadway while the ego vehicle is still moving forward, there would be a significant risk of collision.
+
+the spatial proximity between the person and the ego vehicle is concerning, especially given the low visibility conditions at night. the person could potentially enter the roadway without proper signaling or awareness of the vehicle's approach. additionally, the ego vehicle has limited visibility of the person due to the dark environment and the person's position on the left side of the road.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

2dd9daa2312e66da3c0ea477145b70b8/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a narrow residential street in what appears to be san francisco, characterized by its iconic row houses with distinctive architecture. it's daytime with clear blue skies and excellent visibility. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-way street with a concrete surface that shows some wear. the street is flanked by multi-story apartment buildings on both sides, featuring balconies, windows, and decorative elements typical of this urban neighborhood. there are several parked vehicles along both sides of the street, including a white sedan (object 1) on the right side and a dark-colored vehicle (object 3) further ahead. the road appears to have minimal traffic, with only these parked cars visible. the environment suggests a quiet residential area with well-maintained sidewalks and some landscaping elements like trees lining portions of the street.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: a white sedan parked on the right side of the street. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.89, -7.5], this vehicle is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: a red sedan parked on the right side of the street, partially obscured by object 1. based on the relative 3d coordinates[16.14, -7.5], this vehicle is slightly further ahead and to the right of object 1.
+object 3: a dark-colored sedan parked on the right side of the street, positioned further ahead than objects 1 and 2. based on the relative 3d coordinates[17.39, -7.5], this vehicle is even further ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a narrow residential street with parked vehicles on both sides. the most concerning factor is the presence of multiple parked vehicles that could potentially pull out into the roadway. object 1 (white sedan) is directly in the ego vehicle's path and appears to be moving forward, which creates a potential conflict if it suddenly enters the driving lane. object 2 (red sedan) is partially visible behind object 1 and also appears to be moving forward. object 3 (dark sedan) is further ahead and to the right, but its movement is less critical since it's not directly in the ego vehicle's path.
+
+the risk level is elevated due to the narrow nature of the street, the presence of multiple vehicles that could potentially enter the driving lane, and the limited space for evasive maneuvers. the ego vehicle would need to maintain a safe following distance from object 1 while being aware of the potential movements of objects 2 and 3. if object 1 suddenly accelerates or changes direction, the ego vehicle would have limited options for avoiding a collision given the confined space.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

2e031f165cb7b252dd42a7b60e730bd9/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime residential neighborhood with minimal lighting. the ego vehicle is traveling down a two-lane road that appears to be a cul-de-sac or dead-end street. the environment is characterized by single-story houses with illuminated windows on both sides of the road. there are streetlights visible at the beginning of the road, providing some illumination but not enough to fully illuminate the surroundings. the road surface shows signs of wear with visible cracks. the area appears to be a quiet suburban neighborhood with no visible pedestrians or vehicles ahead of the ego vehicle. the overall atmosphere is dark and somewhat eerie due to the limited visibility.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a small vehicle or possibly a person standing near the curb on the left side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[8.79, -6.4], this object is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, likely near the edge of the road where it meets the sidewalk.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection with what appears to be a stop sign (though not clearly visible) and a small building (object 1) on the left side of the road. the ego vehicle should slow down and potentially stop at the intersection if there are any vehicles or pedestrians present. however, the critical factor here is the presence of object 1, which appears to be a small vehicle or person standing near the curb on the left side of the road.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe because:
+1. the ego vehicle may not have sufficient time to react if object 1 suddenly moves into the roadway.
+2. the visibility is poor at night, making it difficult for the ego driver to fully assess the situation.
+3. the small size of object 1 means it could easily be overlooked during normal driving.
+4. the proximity of object 1 to the curb suggests it might step onto the road unexpectedly.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

2ea95c7b5be70120cd26ba7166e2edc6/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime urban environment with the ego vehicle traveling on a two-lane road. it's a clear night with good visibility despite the darkness. the road is well-marked with double yellow lines dividing opposing lanes. on both sides of the road are commercial buildings, including one with visible signage that reads "2700" on the right side. there are orange traffic barriers on the left side of the road, suggesting some construction or maintenance work may be taking place. the road appears to be in a business district with moderate lighting from street lamps and building lights. the overall environment suggests a commercial area with limited traffic at this time of day.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a pedestrian standing on the sidewalk to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.85, -16.9], the pedestrian is positioned ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this is a vehicle directly ahead of the ego vehicle in the same lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[11.61, -16.9], the vehicle is positioned slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this appears to be another vehicle further ahead in the same lane as object 2. based on the relative 3d coordinates[11.61, -16.9], this vehicle is also positioned slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this is a vehicle to the right of the ego vehicle, likely in an adjacent lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.85, -16.9], this vehicle is positioned ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road at night with moderate lighting conditions. the presence of pedestrians (object 1) on the sidewalk poses a significant risk if they suddenly enter the roadway. while the pedestrians appear to be standing still, their unpredictable movements could lead to sudden crossing into the vehicle's path. the ego vehicle has sufficient space to safely stop if needed, but the risk is heightened by the dark environment which reduces visibility for both parties.
+
+the vehicles ahead (objects 2 and 3) appear to be maintaining their positions in the same lane as the ego vehicle. there is no indication of any immediate need for the ego vehicle to change lanes or overtake these vehicles. the vehicle to the right (object 4) is not directly in the ego vehicle's path and does not pose an immediate conflict.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

2f7f1d5b53fae5fd643c0ada046d7f3a/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban residential street during daytime with clear, sunny weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with moderate traffic. on both sides of the street, there are parked vehicles along the curb, creating a narrow driving corridor. to the left side of the road, there's a concrete wall with graffiti and some tents visible, suggesting this might be near a homeless encampment area. on the right side stands a multi-story apartment building with balconies and a fence. palm trees line the street ahead, and there are several buildings visible in the distance. the road appears to be in a densely populated neighborhood with commercial establishments visible further down the street.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: a red sedan parked on the left side of the road.
+object 2: a person standing next to the red sedan, possibly interacting with it.
+object 3: a white suv parked on the right side of the road.
+object 4: a small box or package placed on the ground near the red sedan.
+object 5: a blue trash can or container positioned near the red sedan.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a narrow urban street with parked vehicles on both sides. the most concerning factor is the presence of pedestrians (object 2) near the parked red sedan (object 1) on the left side of the road. if the ego vehicle were to make any sudden maneuvers, especially if it were to change lanes or accelerate, it would create a dangerous situation for the pedestrian who appears to be interacting with the parked vehicle.
+
+the pedestrian is positioned directly in the ego vehicle's path, making it difficult for the driver to see them clearly. if the ego vehicle were to suddenly brake or swerve, it could potentially hit the pedestrian. additionally, the presence of the small box or package (object 4) near the vehicle suggests that the pedestrian may be retrieving or placing items, which could lead to unpredictable movements.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.87

2fe32b2cddf4f6e328e294fca52e482f/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban street during daytime with overcast conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with a yellow center line dividing opposing directions. to the left side of the road, there's a red-painted bike lane with parked vehicles along the curb. the right side features commercial buildings including a restaurant with a sign that reads "liberace's." there are trees lining both sides of the street, and overhead power lines are visible. traffic appears light, with only a few vehicles visible ahead at what looks like a crosswalk area. the road surface shows some wear with visible cracks, and there's a pedestrian sidewalk on the right side where people can be seen sitting near the building entrance.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a person riding a motorcycle or scooter directly in front of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: a dark-colored sedan parked on the right side of the road.
+object 3: a white suv/pickup truck parked on the left side of the road.
+object 4: a dark sedan parked on the left side of the road.
+object 5: a red sedan parked on the left side of the road.
+object 6: a person standing near the parked vehicles on the right side.
+object 7: a person standing near the parked vehicles on the right side.
+object 8: a person standing near the parked vehicles on the right side.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with moderate traffic conditions. the most significant risk factor is the presence of the motorcycle/scooter rider (object 1) directly in front of the ego vehicle. if the ego vehicle were to accelerate or change lanes, it would create a direct path conflict with the motorcyclist who appears to be traveling in the same direction. the motorcyclist's visibility is good from the ego vehicle's perspective, but any sudden movement by the motorcyclist could lead to a collision if not properly anticipated.
+
+the parked vehicles on both sides of the road (objects 2-5) do not present immediate hazards as they are stationary. however, if the ego vehicle were to make a sudden stop or turn while these vehicles are occupied, there could be potential for pedestrians (objects 6-8) to step into the roadway unexpectedly.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

3b8971fbee44af097f4be9a4cd73748e/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a narrow residential street in what appears to be san francisco, characterized by its iconic multi-story apartment buildings with distinctive architecture. it's daytime with clear blue skies and excellent visibility. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-way street with yellow center lines dividing opposing lanes. both sides of the street are lined with parked vehicles, creating a typical urban neighborhood environment. the road surface shows some wear with visible cracks. there are trees lining portions of the right side of the street, and the overall setting suggests a densely populated residential area with moderate traffic density.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a silver/gray sedan positioned directly ahead of the ego vehicle in the same lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -6.58], this vehicle is slightly to the right of the ego vehicle and approximately 15 meters ahead.
+object 2: a white suv/pickup truck parked on the left side of the street, partially visible in the foreground.
+object 3: a dark-colored suv/pickup truck parked on the right side of the street, near the edge of the frame.
+object 4: a bicycle rack mounted on the roof of a vehicle visible in the left foreground.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching a silver sedan (object 1) that is directly ahead in the same lane. the silver sedan appears to be stationary or moving slowly, as indicated by its position relative to the ego vehicle. given the narrow nature of the street and the presence of parked vehicles on both sides, there is minimal space for maneuvering if the silver sedan were to suddenly accelerate or change direction.
+
+the ego vehicle has a clear path forward through the intersection, but the proximity of the silver sedan creates a potential conflict zone. if the silver sedan were to suddenly accelerate while the ego vehicle is approaching, there would be insufficient space for evasive action. additionally, the presence of parked vehicles on both sides limits escape routes and increases the risk of collision.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

3c243f1b8d4b859587b48377893a7512/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban residential area during daytime with clear, partly cloudy weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with a concrete curb separating the roadway from a grassy median. on both sides of the road are trees and some commercial buildings, creating a typical suburban environment. there's a large yellow caution tape barrier visible across the median, suggesting some construction or maintenance work may be taking place. several vehicles are parked along the right side of the road, including a black pickup truck (object 4) directly ahead of the ego vehicle and a red suv (object 2) further down the road. the road surface appears to be in good condition with no visible lane markings. the overall environment suggests this is a low-speed residential or mixed-use area with moderate traffic density.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 4: a black pickup truck positioned directly in front of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[15.79, -16.8], this vehicle is slightly to the right of the ego vehicle's path.
+object 2: a red suv parked on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[18.17, -16.8], this vehicle is positioned further ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 6: a gray sign mounted on a pole in the median area. based on the relative 3d coordinates[15.79, -16.8], this sign is positioned in front of the ego vehicle and slightly to the right.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle appears to be approaching a black pickup truck (object 4) that is directly ahead in the same lane. the pickup truck is positioned at approximately 15.79 meters ahead and 16.8 meters to the right of the ego vehicle. given the spatial proximity and similar direction of travel, there is a potential for a rear-end collision if the pickup truck suddenly stops or changes speed unexpectedly.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe because:
+1. the pickup truck is directly in the ego vehicle's path
+2. there appears to be limited space between the vehicles
+3. the pickup truck could potentially pull out into the ego vehicle's lane
+4. the ego vehicle has limited visibility of the pickup truck's intentions
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

3c7eb4b2fd0190520cff3f6fd63deba7/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban street intersection during daytime with clear, sunny weather conditions. the ego vehicle is approaching a crosswalk at what appears to be a major city intersection with multiple lanes in each direction. the surrounding environment features tall apartment buildings, commercial establishments, and landscaped areas with trees lining the sidewalks. traffic signals are visible at the intersection, with some showing green lights while others show red. the road surface has yellow crosswalk markings, and there are pedestrian walkways on both sides of the street. the intersection appears to be a busy downtown area with moderate traffic flow, though no vehicles are immediately visible ahead of the ego vehicle. the urban setting includes commercial signage, pedestrian infrastructure, and a distinctive building structure visible in the distance that resembles a government or civic building.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a pedestrian standing near the crosswalk on the right side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.75, -16.98], this person is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: another pedestrian located further ahead on the right side of the road, near the crosswalk area.
+object 3: a pedestrian on the left side of the road, near the curb.
+object 4: a pedestrian crossing the intersection from the right side.
+object 5: a pedestrian crossing the intersection from the left side.
+object 6: a pedestrian on the left side of the road, near the curb.
+object 7: a pedestrian on the right side of the road, near the crosswalk.
+object 8: a pedestrian on the right side of the road, near the crosswalk.
+object 9: a pedestrian on the right side of the road, near the crosswalk.
+object 10: a pedestrian on the right side of the road, near the crosswalk.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection where pedestrians are actively crossing the street. the most critical risk factor is the presence of multiple pedestrians (object 1-10) who appear to be crossing the intersection from various directions. these pedestrians are positioned directly in the ego vehicle's path, creating a significant potential for collision if they do not maintain proper visibility or follow appropriate crossing protocols.
+
+the pedestrians are spread across different positions around the intersection, with some already in mid-crossing and others preparing to enter the roadway. their relative 3d coordinates indicate they are positioned both in front of and to the sides of the ego vehicle, requiring careful monitoring by the driver. the pedestrians' movements are unpredictable, especially since they may be distracted or not fully aware of their surroundings.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

3cd4662cdf84745d9a4292b1b91ddd2d/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a bright, sunny day with clear blue skies in what appears to be a residential neighborhood in southern california. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with moderate traffic. the street is lined with palm trees and well-maintained hedges on both sides, creating a typical suburban environment. on the left side of the road, there's a black honda cr-v parked along the curb, while on the right side, there's a white pickup truck parked near a hedge. several vehicles can be seen ahead in the distance, suggesting this is a moderately busy residential area. the road surface shows some wear but is generally in good condition, with a concrete sidewalk running alongside it. the overall atmosphere is calm and orderly, with no immediate hazards visible.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 2: this is a black honda cr-v parked on the left side of the road. based on the relative 3d coordinates[9.58, -6.4], the vehicle is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a white pickup truck parked on the right side of the road. according to the relative 3d coordinates[17.13, -11.14], the truck is positioned further ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle appears to be traveling on a two-lane road with moderate traffic conditions. the black honda cr-v (object 2) is parked on the left side of the road, while the white pickup truck (object 3) is parked on the right side. both vehicles appear to be stationary and not posing any immediate threat to the ego vehicle's path.
+
+the ego vehicle has sufficient space to continue forward without needing to change lanes or avoid either vehicle. the parked vehicles are clearly visible and do not present any obstacles that would require evasive action. the road ahead is clear of moving vehicles, and there are no visible hazards that would necessitate slowing down or stopping.
+
+risk level: safe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.24