Upload 50 files

0ff0c31f2673c84d4b2d5f60fcc55f11/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban nighttime driving scenario with the ego vehicle traveling on a two-lane road flanked by tall office buildings. the environment is characterized by dim lighting conditions with street lamps providing minimal illumination. the ego vehicle is proceeding straight ahead on a relatively clear road with visible lane markings. to the left side of the road stands a large multi-story building with numerous windows, while the right side features another prominent building with distinctive architectural elements including illuminated sections. there appears to be some pedestrian activity along the sidewalks, though visibility is limited due to the dark conditions. the road surface shows signs of wear but is generally in reasonable condition for nighttime driving.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a vehicle positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -16.85], it's located slightly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this vehicle is positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle. its relative coordinates[14.97, -16.85] indicate it's slightly ahead and to the left of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this vehicle is parked on the right side of the road near the curb. based on the relative coordinates[14.97, -16.85], it's positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this vehicle is also parked on the right side of the road, similar to object 3. its relative coordinates[14.97, -16.85] suggest it's positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 5: this vehicle is parked on the right side of the road near the curb, similar to objects 3 and 4. its relative coordinates[14.97, -16.85] indicate it's positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 6: this appears to be a person standing near the curb on the right side of the road. based on the relative coordinates[14.97, -16.85], they are positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road at night with moderate visibility. the vehicles (object 1, 2) appear to be parked along both sides of the road rather than actively moving. the ego vehicle has sufficient space to continue forward without immediate concerns about collision risk. the parked vehicles (object 3, 4, 5) do not present any immediate hazard as they are stationary. the person (object 6) appears to be standing near the curb and does not pose a direct threat to the ego vehicle's path.
+
+risk level: safe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.24

1ac779c8a65addc40502a62282fcd4b4/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a rainy day in what appears to be a residential neighborhood with wet pavement reflecting the overcast sky. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road flanked by trees and well-maintained properties. on both sides of the street are multi-story apartment buildings and townhouses with manicured lawns and hedges. traffic cones are visible on the right side of the road, suggesting some construction or maintenance work is taking place. the road surface shows signs of recent rainfall with visible water puddles. the overall environment suggests a quiet suburban area with moderate traffic conditions despite the wet weather.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a white van or truck positioned ahead of the ego vehicle in the same lane. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.68, -15.97], it's located slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: a dark-colored sedan positioned to the left of the ego vehicle, likely in an adjacent lane.
+object 3: another vehicle visible further ahead in the distance.
+object 4: orange traffic cones placed on the right side of the road, indicating some form of work zone or hazard area.
+object 5: a large tree trunk visible on the left side of the frame.
+object 6: a person standing near the traffic cones on the right side of the road.
+object 7: another traffic cone near the person.
+object 8: additional traffic cones near the person.
+object 9: a traffic cone near the person.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle would need to navigate through a potentially hazardous area marked by traffic cones on the right side of the road. the presence of multiple traffic cones indicates that there may be ongoing construction or maintenance work requiring caution from passing vehicles. the white van (object 1) is positioned directly ahead of the ego vehicle in the same lane, which could create a conflict if the van suddenly stops or changes direction unexpectedly.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe due to several factors:
+1. the presence of multiple traffic cones on the right side creates a potential blind spot for the ego vehicle.
+2. the white van (object 1) is directly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle, which could limit visibility of any hazards beyond the cones.
+3. the wet road conditions reduce traction and increase stopping distances.
+4. the person standing near the cones (object 6) may suddenly enter the roadway, especially if they're involved in the construction work.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

1afa50eececcdfaf58fa47ccceff7487/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban street environment with clear daylight conditions and partly cloudy skies. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road flanked by tall office buildings on both sides. the right side features a modern glass building with vertical blinds, while the left side has a large brown brick high-rise building with palm trees lining its base. traffic appears to be light, with no visible vehicles ahead of the ego car. orange construction barriers with traffic cones are positioned along the left side of the road, indicating ongoing work. there are speed limit signs visible at various points along the road, including one showing "30 mph" on the left side. the road surface shows some wear with visible lane markings, and there are small landscaped areas with trees and shrubs separating the sidewalk from the roadway.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a person standing near the right side of the road, possibly interacting with the construction zone.
+object 2: this is a construction worker or equipment operator visible through the barrier on the left side of the road.
+object 3: this is a pedestrian walking on the sidewalk on the right side of the road.
+object 4: this appears to be a construction worker or equipment operator visible through the barrier on the right side of the road.
+object 5: this is another pedestrian walking on the sidewalk on the right side of the road.
+object 6: this is a construction worker or equipment operator visible through the barrier on the left side of the road.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a relatively narrow urban street with construction barriers and pedestrians present. the most significant risk factor is the proximity of pedestrians (object 1, 3, 4, 5) who appear to be moving along the sidewalks adjacent to the roadway. these pedestrians could potentially step into the path of the ego vehicle if they are not paying attention to their surroundings.
+
+the construction barriers on both sides create a confined space that may limit the ego vehicle's ability to react quickly if a pedestrian suddenly enters the roadway. the presence of construction workers (object 2, 6) also adds complexity as they might need to move unexpectedly across the road.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.87

1b1562ef6e5e7ab5df24f497e96a3318/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime urban environment with the ego vehicle traveling through what appears to be a residential or commercial area. the road is a two-lane street with visible lane markings, though visibility is somewhat limited due to the darkness. palm trees line both sides of the road, creating a distinctive urban landscape. there are several illuminated elements: streetlights on the left side, a bright light source ahead that could be from another vehicle or streetlight, and some artificial lighting visible on the right side. the road surface shows signs of wear with some cracks visible. the overall environment suggests a quiet neighborhood or small commercial district at night.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a vehicle positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.95, -7.6], it's located slightly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: these appear to be two tall streetlights positioned on the left side of the road. they are marked with the number "2" and are likely part of the road infrastructure.
+object 3: this is the ego vehicle itself, which is navigating through the nighttime environment.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection where object 1 (the vehicle to the front-right) is positioned. the ego vehicle should slow down and proceed with caution when approaching this intersection, especially given the nighttime conditions and the presence of the vehicle to the right. the vehicle to the right appears to be stationary or moving slowly, but its exact speed is not clear from the image alone.
+
+the ego vehicle has sufficient space to safely navigate around the vehicle to the right while maintaining proper following distance. the road appears to be a two-way street with adequate width for passing if necessary. however, the nighttime conditions reduce visibility and reaction time, making cautious driving essential. the ego vehicle should maintain vigilance for any unexpected movements from the vehicle to the right and adjust speed accordingly.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

1bd3a510a00a6764f2ca0c08d2635c92/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban residential area with overcast weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling through a narrow two-way street flanked by multi-story apartment buildings on both sides. the road surface appears to be in need of repair, with visible cracks and patches. there are pedestrian crosswalks marked with white stripes across the roadway. on the left side of the frame, construction equipment including excavators and pipes is visible near some buildings, indicating ongoing work. the right side features a large gray apartment building with distinctive architectural elements. overhead, there are power lines running across the street. traffic appears light, with only a few vehicles visible in the distance. the environment suggests a typical residential neighborhood with moderate activity levels.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a small vehicle (possibly a bicycle or scooter) positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on its relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -5.86], it is located ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this is a stop sign mounted on a pole to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on its relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -5.86], it is positioned similarly to object 1 but slightly further away.
+object 3: this appears to be a utility pole with wires extending from it, located to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on its relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -5.86], it is positioned similarly to objects 1 and 2.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching a stop sign (object 2) while navigating through what appears to be a residential area with limited traffic. the presence of construction equipment on the left side of the road creates a potential hazard zone that requires caution. the small vehicle (object 1) is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, which could potentially enter the ego vehicle's path if it were to suddenly accelerate or change direction.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe due to several factors:
+1. the ego vehicle is approaching a stop sign, requiring complete stopping before proceeding
+2. the small vehicle (object 1) is positioned in the ego vehicle's blind spot, making it difficult to detect
+3. the construction zone on the left side of the road may have unpredictable hazards
+4. the narrow nature of the two-way street limits escape routes
+
+if the ego vehicle were to proceed without stopping at the stop sign, it would create a dangerous situation where the small vehicle might suddenly appear in the ego vehicle's path. additionally, the construction zone presents an additional risk factor that the ego vehicle should be aware of.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

1c03d26f31f89c4e75d406bd2de496f8/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a clear, sunny day at an urban intersection with palm trees lining both sides of the road. the ego vehicle is traveling on a multi-lane road approaching a traffic light intersection. there are several traffic signals visible ahead, including a green light at the main intersection. to the left side of the road, there appears to be a parking lot area with some commercial buildings visible. the road surface shows some wear with visible lane markings. traffic appears relatively light, with only a few vehicles visible in the distance. the environment suggests this is likely a commercial or retail district with wide roads designed for moderate traffic flow.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a pedestrian crossing signal or traffic control device located on the left side of the road.
+object 2: a white van or truck positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, partially visible in the rightmost frame.
+object 3: a vehicle directly ahead of the ego vehicle, positioned in the center lane.
+object 4: a traffic signal visible on the right side of the road.
+object 5: another traffic signal visible further ahead on the right side.
+object 6: a traffic signal visible on the far right side of the road.
+object 7: a traffic signal visible on the left side of the road.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection with multiple traffic signals. the white van (object 2) is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, which could potentially create a conflict if it attempts to merge into the ego vehicle's path. however, based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.89, -1.6], the van is positioned slightly ahead and to the right of the ego vehicle, not directly in its path.
+
+the ego vehicle should maintain its current lane and follow the traffic signals. the white van appears to be proceeding normally through its own lane and does not appear to be preparing to change lanes or cross paths with the ego vehicle. the traffic signals ahead indicate that the ego vehicle has the right of way, so there is no immediate need to change lanes or adjust speed.
+
+risk level: safe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.24

1c2695b6dc58bde4cdaacebf572c199a/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a nighttime urban intersection during rainy weather conditions. the ego vehicle is positioned at what appears to be a crosswalk with wet pavement reflecting streetlights and traffic signals. the environment shows a commercial area with visible storefronts including a yoshinoya restaurant on the left side. traffic lights are visible ahead, showing red signals indicating vehicles must stop. the intersection has multiple lanes with lane markings clearly visible on the wet road surface. the overall lighting is dim due to the nighttime setting, with artificial streetlights creating a bokeh effect from raindrops on the camera lens. there are no pedestrians visible in the immediate vicinity, but the presence of traffic signals and commercial establishments suggests this is a busy urban area.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: a dark-colored sedan positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.75, -16.8], this vehicle is located approximately 14.75 meters ahead and 16.8 meters to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: a white sedan positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.94, -16.8], this vehicle is slightly further ahead and to the right of object 1.
+object 3: a traffic signal located to the front-left of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.38, -16.8], this traffic light is positioned about 1.38 meters ahead and 16.8 meters to the left of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: a traffic signal located to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.94, -16.8], this traffic light is positioned similarly to object 2.
+object 5: a traffic signal located to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.94, -16.8], this traffic light is positioned similarly to object 2.
+object 6: a traffic signal located to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.94, -16.8], this traffic light is positioned similarly to object 2.
+
+3. risk analysis
+the scene depicts a potentially dangerous situation where the ego vehicle may need to make a sudden maneuver to avoid collision with an oncoming vehicle. object 1 (dark sedan) is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, while object 2 (white sedan) is slightly further ahead and to the right. both vehicles appear to be traveling in the same direction as the ego vehicle, though they are not directly in its path.
+
+the ego vehicle should maintain its current lane and follow the traffic signals that show red lights, requiring it to come to a complete stop. if object 1 (dark sedan) continues forward without slowing down, it could potentially enter the ego vehicle's path unexpectedly. given the wet road conditions and limited visibility, the ego vehicle would have reduced reaction time to brake if object 1 suddenly accelerates or changes direction.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.85

1c606b71cbbb08251345d152bd5d4d4b/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban intersection during daytime with clear, partly cloudy weather conditions. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road approaching an intersection with traffic signals visible ahead. to the left side of the road stands a gas station with a red canopy and a target store visible behind it. there are several vehicles visible in the scene: a black sedan (object 1) positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle, a white pickup truck (object 3) directly ahead, and a gray sedan (object 4) to the right side of the road. traffic appears to be flowing steadily through the intersection, with multiple lanes of traffic visible in both directions. the road surface shows some wear with visible lane markings. the surrounding environment includes commercial buildings, palm trees, and streetlights lining the roadway.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a black sedan positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[15.79, -16.8], this vehicle is approximately 15.8 meters ahead and slightly to the left of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a white pickup truck located directly ahead of the ego vehicle. its relative 3d coordinates[1.13, -16.8] indicate it's about 1.13 meters to the right and 16.8 meters ahead of the ego vehicle.
+object 4: this is a gray sedan positioned to the right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[1.13, -16.8], it's approximately 1.13 meters to the right and 16.8 meters ahead of the ego vehicle.
+object 5: this appears to be another vehicle further ahead in the distance, though its exact position isn't specified in the relative coordinates.
+object 6: this is a traffic signal mounted on a pole to the right of the ego vehicle, showing green lights.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection where traffic signals are visible but not clearly shown in the images. the black sedan (object 1) is positioned to the front-left of the ego vehicle, while the white pickup truck (object 3) is directly ahead. the gray sedan (object 4) is to the right of the ego vehicle. all vehicles appear to be maintaining their respective lanes and following the flow of traffic through the intersection.
+
+the ego vehicle has sufficient space to proceed straight ahead without immediate conflict with any vehicles. the black sedan (object 1) is positioned to the front-left, which means it would need to change lanes to the right to intersect with the ego vehicle's path. the white pickup truck (object 3) is directly ahead and appears to be proceeding normally through the intersection. the gray sedan (object 4) is to the right and also appears to be moving forward.
+
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.23

1ed2ba95b036f4a0d22347e9f6cc987a/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts an urban street during daytime with clear blue skies. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road with a white lane divider separating opposing directions. to the left side of the road, there's a gas station with a red building and various signs, including one that reads "affordable homes." the right side features a row of brick buildings, likely residential or mixed-use structures. traffic appears light, with only a few vehicles visible ahead. the road surface shows some wear with visible cracks. traffic signals can be seen at intersections, though they appear to be green for the ego vehicle's direction. the environment suggests a commercial area with businesses along both sides of the street, and there are pedestrian crosswalks visible at the intersection.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this is a black suv positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle. based on the relative 3d coordinates[14.97, -16.85], it's approximately 15 meters ahead and slightly to the right of the ego vehicle.
+object 2: this appears to be a pedestrian crossing the street in the crosswalk area, positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle.
+object 3: this is a white pickup truck ahead of the ego vehicle, traveling in the same direction.
+object 4: this is a red sedan parked on the left side of the road near the gas station.
+object 5: this is a person standing near the gas station on the left side of the road.
+object 6: this appears to be a traffic signal or signpost on the right side of the road.
+object 7: this is a person standing on the sidewalk to the left of the road.
+object 8: these are orange traffic cones placed on the sidewalk near the crosswalk area.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is approaching an intersection where traffic appears to be flowing normally. the black suv (object 1) is positioned to the front-right of the ego vehicle, which means it would be in the ego vehicle's blind spot if the ego vehicle were to make a right turn. however, since the ego vehicle is traveling straight ahead, there is no immediate conflict with this vehicle.
+
+the white pickup truck (object 3) is directly ahead of the ego vehicle and appears to be maintaining its lane. there is no indication that this vehicle will change lanes or create any conflict path with the ego vehicle.
+
+the red sedan (object 4) is parked on the left side of the road and poses no immediate threat to the ego vehicle's path.
+
+the pedestrian (object 2) is crossing the street in the crosswalk area, which is appropriate behavior given the presence of a crosswalk. this pedestrian should be fully visible to the ego vehicle and does not present any immediate conflict.
+
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.23

2b39dc8e32a73d077ada21933e95c6cb/vpd-lm.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+1. scene description
+the scene depicts a residential street on a clear, sunny day with excellent visibility. the ego vehicle is traveling on a two-lane road surrounded by large trees lining both sides of the street, creating a canopy effect over the roadway. the environment appears to be a upscale neighborhood with well-maintained properties featuring white stucco houses and decorative fencing visible on the left side. the road surface shows some wear but is generally in good condition. there are several parked vehicles along both sides of the street, including a red pickup truck (object 3) on the left side and a white suv (object 2) on the right side. the overall atmosphere suggests a quiet, tree-lined residential area with moderate traffic density.
+
+2. critical objects
+object 1: this appears to be a dark-colored suv or minivan parked on the right side of the road.
+object 5: a white sedan parked on the right side of the road.
+object 4: a dark-colored suv or minivan parked on the right side of the road.
+object 6: a dark-colored suv or minivan parked on the right side of the road.
+object 3: a red pickup truck parked on the left side of the road.
+object 2: a white suv parked on the right side of the road.
+
+3. risk analysis
+in this scenario, the ego vehicle is traveling on a narrow residential street with multiple parked vehicles on both sides. the most concerning potential conflict situation involves the white suv (object 2) on the right side of the road. if this vehicle were to suddenly pull out from its parking spot into the roadway, it would create a direct conflict path with the ego vehicle's forward trajectory. the white suv is positioned at an angle that could potentially block the ego vehicle's path if it moves forward.
+
+the risk level is considered unsafe because:
+1. the white suv (object 2) is positioned directly in the ego vehicle's path when viewed from the front-right perspective.
+2. the vehicle appears to be parked at an angle that could potentially enter the roadway.
+3. the narrow nature of the residential street limits escape options for either vehicle.
+4. the white suv's proximity to the ego vehicle's path creates a significant blind spot for the ego driver.
+
+risk level: unsafe
+therefore, the unsafety score of this should be: 0.87