text stringlengths 0 820 |
|---|
PresenceComparison |
Area |
Rural/UrbanQuestions catalog |
(a) Question construction procedure. Dash lines represent optional paths |
Road"How many roads are present in the image?" |
"Is there a small retail place?" |
"Is there more buildings at the top of a circular religious place than roads in the image?"Road Count Base question |
Retail Size Presence Base question |
Building |
Religious ShapePositional |
Comparison Base question |
(b) Construction path for sample questions. |
Fig. 2. Illustration of the question construction procedure. |
generate remote sensing-oriented VQA datasets from already |
available human annotations in section II and generate two |
datasets. We then use this newly-generated data to train |
our proposed RSVQA model with a non-spatial fusion step |
described in section III. Finally, the results are evaluated and |
discussed in section IV. |
Our contribution are the following: |
•a method to generate remote sensing-oriented VQA |
datasets; |
•2 datasets; |
•the proposed RSVQA model. |
This work extends the preliminary study of [6] by considering |
and disclosing a second larger dataset consisting of very high |
resolution images. This second dataset helps testing the spatial |
generalization capability of VQA and provides an extensive |
discussion highlighting remaining challenges. The method to |
generate the dataset, the RSVQA model and the two datasets |
are available on https://rsvqa.sylvainlobry.com/. |
II. D ATASETS |
A. Method |
As seen in the introduction, a main limiting factor for |
VQA is the availability of task-specific datasets. As such, |
we aim at providing a collection of remote sensing images |
with questions and answers associated to them. To do so, |
we took inspiration from [31], in which the authors build |
a dataset of question/answer pairs about synthetic images |
following an automated procedure. However, in this study |
we are interested in real data (discussed in subsection II-B). |
Therefore, we use the openly accessible OpenStreetMap data |
containing geo-localized information provided by volunteers. |
By leveraging this data, we can automatically extract theinformation required to obtain question/answer pairs relevant |
to real remotely sensed data and create a dataset made of |
(image, question, answer) triplets. |
The first step of the database construction is to create |
the questions. The second step is to compute the answers |
to the questions, using the OSM features belonging to the |
image footprint. Note that multiple question/answer pairs are |
extracted for each image. |
1) Question contruction: Our method to construct the |
questions is illustrated in Figure 2. It consists of four main |
components: |
1) choice of an element category (highlighted in red in |
Figure 2(a)); |
2) application of attributes to the element (highlighted in |
green in Figure 2(a)); |
3) selection based on the relative location to another ele- |
ment (highlighted in green in Figure 2(a)) |
4) construction of the question (highlighted in blue in |
Figure 2(a)). |
Examples of question constructions are shown in Figure 2(b). |
These four components are detailed in the following. |
Element category selection : First, an element category is ran- |
domly selected from the element catalog. This catalog is built |
by extracting the elements from one of the following OSM |
layers: road,water area ,building andland use . While roads |
and water areas are directly treated as elements, buildings |
and land use related objects are defined based on their ”type” |
field, as defined in the OSM data specification. Examples of |
land use objects include residential area, construction area, |
religious places, . . . Buildings are divided in two categories: |
commercial (e.g. retail, supermarket, ...) and residential (e.g. |
house, apartments, . . . ). |
Attributes application : The second (optional) step is to |
refine the previously selected element category. To do so, |
we randomly select from one of the two possible attribute |
categories: |
•Shape : each element can be either square, rectangular |
or circular. Whether an element belongs to one of these |
shape types is decided based on basic geometrical prop- |
erties (i.e. hard thresholds on area-to-perimeter ratio and |
area-to-circumscribed circle area ratio). |
•Size: using hard thresholds on the surface area, elements |
can be considered ”small”, ”medium” or ”large”. As we |
are interested in information at different scales in the |
two datasets, we use different threshold values, which |
are described in Table I. |
Relative position : Another possibility to refine the element is |
to look at its relative position compared to another element. |
We define 5 relations: ”left of”, ”top of”, ”right of”, ”bottom |
of”, ”next to”. Note that these relative positions are understood |
in the image space (i.e. geographically). The special case of |
PRE-PRINT. FINAL VERSION IN IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING 4 |
Scale Small Medium Large |
Low resolution <3000m2<10000m2≥10000m2 |
High resolution <100m2<500m2≥500m2 |
TABLE I |
THRESHOLDS FOR SIZE ATTRIBUTES ACCORDING TO THE DATASET |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.