Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
_id
string
text
string
AILA_Q2_v1
The appellant before us was examined as prime witness in the trial of T.R. on the file of the Special Judge against the first respondent. The trial ended in conviction against the first respondent and when the appeal filed by him came to be heard by the High Court the appellant had become a Cabinet Minister. On account...
AILA_Q3_v1
This appeal arises from the judgment of the learned Single Judge of High Court dated 6th June, 1988 whereby the learned Single Judge declined to quash the prosecution of the petitioner. The petitioner therein has been prosecuted for selling adulterated supari on the basis of a certificate issued by the Director of Cent...
AILA_Q4_v1
The Petitioner was married to the Respondent No.2, on 27th November, 2005, as per Hindu traditions and customs. At the time of marriage 12 lakhs in cash, 45 sovereigns of gold and 50,000/- is alleged to have been given to the Accused Nos.1 to 4, who are the husband, the mother-in-law and other relatives of the husband....
AILA_Q6_v1
On 19.3.1999, SI P1 along Ct. P2 went to Village V1 where Inspector P1, PW-16, had reached along with his staff. After some time, ACP, arrived at the spot. On enquiry, they came to know that one constable of Police Station, namely, P2, having suffered a gun shot injury, had been taken to the hospital. The Head Constabl...
AILA_Q7_v1
This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal but modifying the sentence. The appellant took his trial on the allegations that he had dishonestly and fraudulently misappropriated a sum of Rs. 3851.60, which amount was in his control in the capacity of a public servant, i....
AILA_Q8_v1
This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23 February 2005 of the High Court (Aurangabad Bench), by which the appeal preferred by the appellants was dismissed and their conviction and sentence of 7 years RI imposed thereunder was affirmed. The deceased P1 was daughter of PW...
AILA_Q9_v1
The complainant P1 filed a Special Leave Petition in this court seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 6th April, 1993 of the High Court. The incident for which these accused were charged is the murder of P2, son of the complainant P1 (appellant) on 13th June, 1982. As per the case of the prosecution, the ...
AILA_Q10_v1
The four appellants, along with P1 son of P2, were jointly tried in the court of Additional Sessions Judge on the following charges: "That you all accused nos. 1 to 5 on or about 12th day of November, 1967 at about 5-45 a.m. near XYZ Road, formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of such asse...
AILA_Q11_v1
The detenu P1, a French national, at the relevant time was employed as Airport Manager by A1 in L1. By an A1 flight, on September 20, 1981, he arrived at International Airport, L2 and passed through green channel indicating he had no dutiable goods to declare to the Customs Authorities. When he was at Exit Gate No. 1, ...
AILA_Q12_v1
The petitioner has been under detention pursuant to the order dated June 5, 1990 passed by the District Magistrate with a view to preventing him "from doing any such work which is prejudicial for the maintenance of public order". The grounds of detention were furnished to the detenu in time. Therein it was stated inter...
AILA_Q14_v1
P1 is before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17.10.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court. Appellant herein along with P2 (Accused No.1), P3 (Accused No. 3) and P4 (Accused No.4) were tried for committing the murder of one P5. P5 was an accused in a case of murder of ...
AILA_Q15_v1
The appellants are five in number and they have filed this appeal as of right. They were acquitted by the trial court but convicted by the High Court on appeal filed by the State, besides the offence of rioting. On the first count they were each sentenced to imprisonment for life besides fine and to lesser sentences fo...
AILA_Q16_v1
The appellant P1 is convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge by judgment and order dated 5th/9th August, 1991 and was sentenced to death subject to confirmation by the High Court. Appellant appealed against the conviction and sentence which was partly allowed. The order with regard to the death penalty was set aside ...
AILA_Q17_v1
facts of the matter, as is evident from the present Writ Petition challenging an order of detention dated 1st March, 2001 it appears that the petitioner is presently confined in Central Prison and it is this detention which the petitioner contended is without the authority of law and constitute an infringement of his g...
AILA_Q18_v1
These appeals involve a pure question of law as to whether an award by which residue assets of a partnership firm are distributed amongst the partners on dissolution of the partnership firm requires registration. Briefly the facts are that a partnership firm was constituted comprising of four persons belonging to the s...
AILA_Q19_v1
This appeal is preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the High Court whereby the High Court has allowed the appeal filed by the State and convicted all the appellants and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each. The br...
AILA_Q20_v1
This appeal by special leave is directed against the Judgment rendered by a High Court confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offences punishable. The High Court by the impugned judgment confirmed the judgment passed by the Principal Sessions Judge convicting the appellant and sentencing him to suffer impri...
AILA_Q22_v1
Assailing the legal acceptability of the judgment and order passed by the High Court where it has given endorsement to the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge wherein the learned trial Judge had found the appellants guilty of the offences and imposed the sentence of rigorous imprisonment of seven y...
AILA_Q23_v1
The petitioner is a firm carrying on business as builders, colonizers and contractors. The petitioner is the owner of 24.45 acres of vacant land situated in s village. Being engaged in construction activities it made an application under the provisions for the grant of licence for group housing scheme. This application...
AILA_Q24_v1
These appeals are directed against the judgment of a High Court whereby an appeal and a criminal revision were disposed of. The appellants were found guilty and sentenced to undergo various terms of sentences. The Criminal Appeal was filed by three appellants questioning the conviction and sentence as recorded. Complai...
AILA_Q25_v1
These appeals involving common questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The lands situated inter alia in villages V1, V2, V3 and V4 were acquired by the State for the purpose of use thereof by the Appellant. A notification was issued on 31.7.1986. ...
AILA_Q26_v1
The hearing before us now relates to certain objections filed to the Award made by a former Judge of this Court who was appointed the sole arbitrator to adjudicate upon the dispute between the parties pursuant to the Order of this Court dated 18th November, 1987 in the circumstances as set out hereinafter. In order to ...
AILA_Q27_v1
Appellant before us was detained. He is the Managing Director of a company, registered and incorporated as CompanyC1. It was an exporter and held a valid licence therefor. The company was to export products of alloy steel. Upon exporting of alloy steel, it was entitled to credits under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (D...
AILA_Q28_v1
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. The appeal was directed against the judgment dated 31.8.2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge convicting the appellants for offence and sentencing each to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fi...
AILA_Q30_v1
That the deceased P1 got married to P2, the 2nd respondent herein, in the year 2001. In her marital home, she was ill-treated by her parents-in-law, respondents 1 and 3 herein. They would constantly tell her that she was incapable of doing the house work properly, and her mother-in-law did not give her sufficient food ...
AILA_Q31_v1
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.5.2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned order passed by the Revisional Court and remanded the matter back to the Revisional Court...
AILA_Q32_v1
On 9th May, 2004, the marriage of the daughter of one P1, the brother of P2 PW.1, was to be solemnized in village Janephal, District Aurangabad. P2 PW.1, arranged a water tanker on the 6th May, 2004. As the tanker was being taken towards P2's house the accused appellants, obstructed the way by putting stones and thorny...
AILA_Q33_v1
This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment and order of the High Court dated March 27, 1958, whereby the said High Court maintained the conviction of the appellant but reduced the sentence of four years' rigorous imprisonment passed on the appellant by the Special Judge, Kanpur, to two years' rigorous impriso...
AILA_Q35_v1
Two appellants, who are brothers, along with their father P1 was prosecuted for an offence. Prosecution case in that the appellants have a sweetmeat shop in L1. PW 6 P2 is residing in a house opposite to the shop. On April 13, 1980, P1, the father of the appellants requested P2 to permit him to tie a rope of the canopy...
AILA_Q37_v1
Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by the High Court upholding conviction of the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused') and sentence as imposed by the trial Court which had sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, two years and seven years respectively ...
AILA_Q40_v1
Having been selected by the Public Service Commission, the respondent herein was appointed as Law Officer-cum-Draftsman in the Directorate of Cooperation. There was only one post in the same Cadre and it had no promotional avenues. He filed a representation that his post be upgraded or two promotional avenues be provid...
AILA_Q41_v1
Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by High Court confirming his conviction for offence and sentence of imprisonment for life as awarded by the learned Sessions Judge. Background facts as unfolded during trial by the prosecution are essentially as follows. One P1 (hereinafter referred to as th...
AILA_Q42_v1
This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 23.8.2016, passed by the High Court wherein High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant. Records reveal that the parents of the appellant, namely, P1 and P2, entered into an agreement to sell dated 14.1.1997 with Respondent No.2 herein. The sale consideratio...
AILA_Q43_v1
Transfer Petition have been filed to transfer the petitions filed pending before the High Court of S1 to the High Court of S2. The petitioner got married to Lt. P1 on 09.03.2012 as per Hindu rites and customs. Petitioner's husband Lt. P1 is a naval officer who was then posted at S1. After marriage, the petitioner was r...
AILA_Q44_v1
This petition is by the State directed against the order dated 10.11.1998 passed by the High Court by which the charges framed against the respondent were quashed. The relevant and necessary facts to dispose of this petition are: The respondent was working as a Road Transport Inspector in the Regional Office of the Roa...
AILA_Q45_v1
The appellants were tried for offences on the allegations that about four months prior to the incident, some quarrel had taken place between the deceased P1 and the appellant No. 4 P2 in relation to raising of boundary wall. On 12 April 1983 at about 7.00 P.M. the deceased accompanied by P3, had gone to P4 (PW-8) to en...
AILA_Q46_v1
In this appeal by special leave the sole appellant is P1 who alongwith six others was put up for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge in charged of the offence. It is not necessary to refer to the charges framed against the remaining accused since they are not appellants before us. The trial court by its judgment...
AILA_Q47_v1
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- with default stipulations, as recorded by the Principal Sessions Judge. The prosecution version, in a n...
AILA_Q49_v1
Appellant was a Patwari working at village V1 in the year 1976. On an allegation that he had sought illegal gratification, on or about 13 July 1976, a complaint was lodged in the office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption that the appellant had asked for illegal gratification. A raiding party laid a tra...
AILA_Q50_v1
A peculiar feature of this appeal by special leave is that it is not an appeal against conviction or against acquittal but one preferred by a prosecution witness for expunction of several highly derogatory remarks made against him by a learned Judge of the High Court while allowing a Criminal Appeal at the High Court. ...

NanoIFIR

This dataset is a Nano-style retrieval dataset for HAKARI-bench.

NanoIFIR contains 7 Nano retrieval splits derived from IFIR. Each split keeps up to 200 eligible queries and up to 10000 corpus documents, with exact duplicate query and document text removed where the generator records that policy.

Usage

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset_id = "hakari-bench/NanoIFIR"
split = "NanoIFIRAila"

queries = load_dataset(dataset_id, "queries", split=split)
corpus = load_dataset(dataset_id, "corpus", split=split)
qrels = load_dataset(dataset_id, "qrels", split=split)
reranking_candidates = load_dataset(dataset_id, "reranking_hybrid", split=split)

Data Layout

This dataset uses six Hugging Face Datasets configs:

  • corpus: documents with _id and text
  • queries: queries with _id and text
  • qrels: positive relevance labels with query-id and corpus-id
  • bm25: BM25 candidate lists with query-id and corpus-ids
  • harrier_oss_v1_270m: dense candidate lists from microsoft/harrier-oss-v1-270m
  • reranking_hybrid: RRF candidate lists built from bm25 and harrier_oss_v1_270m

Each config has the same Nano split names.

Candidate Construction

  • bm25: local BM25 top-500 with automatic language-aware tokenization. The resolved tokenizer is shown in the Candidate Quality table, for example wordseg@ja.
  • harrier_oss_v1_270m: dense top-500 from microsoft/harrier-oss-v1-270m. In tables this is shown as Dense; Dense means microsoft/harrier-oss-v1-270m with the web_search_query prompt for queries and cosine similarity over normalized embeddings.
  • reranking_hybrid: RRF over bm25 and harrier_oss_v1_270m using rrf_k=100, keeping the RRF top-100.

Safeguard means rank 101 is appended only when RRF top-100 contains no qrels-positive document.

Split Statistics

Length statistics are character counts computed with len(str(text)).

Nano split Queries Corpus Qrels Query chars avg Query chars p50 Query chars p75 Doc chars avg Doc chars p50 Doc chars p75
NanoIFIRAila 40 2914 119 2890.1 3012.0 3581.5 19998.1 15303.0 24733.2
NanoIFIRCds 42 10000 466 225.2 213.0 260.2 1630.2 1604.0 1983.0
NanoIFIRFiQA 200 10000 1010 65.8 64.5 78.2 791.9 541.0 975.0
NanoIFIRFire 167 1739 563 3283.8 3242.0 3574.5 27167.7 24688.0 36394.5
NanoIFIRNFCorpus 86 3593 242 37.8 37.0 44.8 1589.5 1612.0 1868.0
NanoIFIRPm 59 10000 1217 145.7 146.0 157.0 2244.9 1651.5 2792.5
NanoIFIRScifact 43 10000 255 73.6 73.0 90.5 1452.6 1454.0 1819.0

Candidate Quality

nDCG@10 and Recall@100 are computed from the included candidate rankings against the included qrels, then reported as 0-100 scores such as 52.45. Recall@100 uses only the top 100 candidates; an optional rank-101 safeguard positive is not counted in Recall@100.

Dense means microsoft/harrier-oss-v1-270m with the web_search_query prompt and cosine similarity.

Nano split BM25 tokenizer BM25 nDCG@10 Dense nDCG@10 Hybrid nDCG@10 BM25 Recall@100 Dense Recall@100 Hybrid Recall@100 Hybrid candidates Safeguard positives
Mean - 37.84 46.06 44.97 59.74 72.00 72.71 - 49
NanoIFIRAila english_porter_stop 9.88 8.78 7.98 28.30 35.19 35.35 100-101 21
NanoIFIRCds english_porter_stop 22.58 40.73 33.76 35.88 72.48 67.06 100-101 3
NanoIFIRFiQA english_porter_stop 34.22 53.28 46.78 62.14 79.86 77.92 100-101 3
NanoIFIRFire english_porter_stop 35.66 34.21 39.96 74.36 69.22 76.63 100-101 12
NanoIFIRNFCorpus english_porter_stop 33.38 45.80 41.08 63.58 83.40 78.27 100-101 9
NanoIFIRPm english_porter_stop 42.32 54.48 54.68 55.85 68.25 74.18 100-101 1
NanoIFIRScifact english_porter_stop 86.82 85.16 90.55 98.10 95.56 99.57 100 0

Hybrid Safeguard Summary

  • Safeguard positives: 49
  • Rows limited by corpus size: 0
  • Metadata file: reranking_hybrid_metadata.json

Source Links

License

NanoIFIR is a derived dataset. Users must comply with the licenses, terms, and attribution requirements of the upstream datasets and benchmarks.

Downloads last month
228