id int64 1 8 | cell_type_workflow stringclasses 8
values | niche_workflow stringclasses 6
values |
|---|---|---|
1 | Annotated based on gene co-expression patterns. | null |
2 | Leiden clustering with majority voting for consensus-based cell-type annotation; provided 3 tiers of annotation. | Labeled niches from cell annotations with clear distributions (e.g. Atrium, Ventricular) for tier 1; considered spatial left/right position for tier 2. |
3 | Unknown. | Unknown, likely mis-ordered annotations. |
4 | Leiden clustering and analyzed predefined marker genes in clusters; typically a single marker gene to differentiate cell types; projected cell types spatially and used position for final annotation. | Used UTAG for spatial clustering; labeled structures based on position and provided anatomical image. |
5 | Leiden clustering and analyzed expression of predefined marker genes in clusters; multiple genes per cell type; mapped both major cell type and subtypes. | Used UTAG for spatial clustering; labeled structures based on position, provided anatomical image and additional sources. |
6 | Label transfer using TACCO with an scRNA-seq reference of human heart; projected cell types spatially; Leiden clustering and DEG for marker genes, using key markers for second-tier annotation. | Used UTAG for spatial clustering; labeled structures based on position and provided anatomical image. |
7 | Leiden clustering with manual annotation using marker gene sets and DEG (per Scanpy tutorial); projected cell types spatially; used spatial position and key marker expression for final annotation; provided 3-tier annotation. | Used UTAG for spatial clustering; labeled structures based on position and anatomical knowledge of heart (e.g. 'chamber wall is thicker on the left ventricle'). |
8 | Combined annotation on Leiden clusters with CellTypist-transferred labels as reference. | Used UTAG for spatial clustering. |
SpatialAgent — Human Expert Reference Data
Anonymized reference data produced by human scientists for two spatial-transcriptomics tasks used to benchmark SpatialAgent:
- Gene panel design — expert-designed targeted gene panels for the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC / PFC).
- Cell-type & tissue-niche annotation — expert annotations of a developing human heart MERFISH dataset (228,633 cells × 238 genes).
All scientist identities are removed. Each task uses its own independent numbering, so
the same person generally has a different id in the two tasks (this is intentional — the
two studies were anonymized separately). No real names appear anywhere in this repository.
Each expert's methodology is documented (by anonymized id) in the workflows.csv files.
Repository layout
panel_design/
workflows.csv # id (1–10) -> free-text description of the panel-design approach
{1..10}.csv # one full panel per expert (ranked gene lists)
split/{id}_top{50,100,150}.csv # top-N subsets of each panel
annotation/
workflows.csv # id (1–8) -> cell-type & niche annotation approach
combined_annotations_anonymized.h5ad # all experts (anonymized) + model/baseline predictions
human_annotations_anonymized.h5ad # human experts only (anonymized), no model columns
per_expert_raw/ # the original per-expert annotation files, anonymized
expert{1,2,5,6,7}.h5ad
expert{3,4}.csv
expert7_niche.h5ad
See panel_design/README.md and annotation/README.md for the column-level details of
each subset.
Panel design (DLPFC)
10 experts each submitted a ranked panel (typically top 50 / 100 / 150 genes) with a short
rationale per gene. Formats are heterogeneous (experts used different tools), so columns
differ between files; the common fields are a gene symbol, a ranking/priority, and a
free-text reasoning column. split/ holds the top-50/100/150 truncations used for
size-matched evaluation. Workflows range from purely algorithmic (Persist, greedy kNN
reconstruction) to literature-driven marker curation — see panel_design/workflows.csv.
Annotation (developing human heart, MERFISH)
8 experts annotated the same 228,633 cells. The two combined .h5ad objects share an
identical cell index and embeddings:
X— log1p-normalized expression (238 genes);layers['raw_count']— raw counts.obsm—X_pca,X_umap,spatial(tissue coordinates).- Per-expert columns:
cell_type_tier{1,2,3}_expert{N},tissue_niche_tier{1,2}_expert{N}, and consolidatedcell_type_expert{N}/tissue_niche_expert{N}. - Consensus reference labels:
cell_type,tissue_niche.
combined_annotations_anonymized.h5ad additionally contains model / baseline predictions
(cell_type_agent, tissue_niche_agent, cell_type_gpt, cell_type_sctab,
cell_type_popv, cell_type_biomni_run_{1,2,3}, cell_type_spatialagent_run_4) for direct
benchmarking; human_annotations_anonymized.h5ad is the human-only subset (those columns
dropped). per_expert_raw/ preserves each expert's original file (with their native,
heterogeneous column schema) for full transparency.
Caveats
- annotation expert 1 did not produce tissue-niche labels (niche fields are empty/NA).
- annotation expert 3's labels are of uncertain origin and are likely mis-ordered — use with care.
- annotation expert 8 has no standalone raw file; their annotations exist only inside the combined objects.
- panel expert 3 submitted a previously designed panel for the wrong tissue.
License & citation
Released under CC-BY-4.0 (adjust if your venue requires otherwise). If you use this
data, please cite the SpatialAgent paper. The two workflows.csv files correspond to the
Extended Data tables describing human-scientist workflows.
- Downloads last month
- 11