My_Dataset / README.md
hardik-0212's picture
Update README.md
de567d8 verified

🎡 Spotify Song Preference Dataset

This dataset contains Spotify audio features for 195 songs categorized as liked or disliked by the user. It was created to build and train ML models that can predict user preferences in music based on quantitative audio features.


πŸ“₯ Dataset Overview

  • Total songs: 195
  • Format: CSV (data.csv)
  • Source: Spotify API
  • Target column: liked (1 = liked, 0 = disliked)
  • Data type: Tabular
  • Licensing: For academic and personal research use (derived from Spotify API)

πŸ“¦ Dataset Composition

Category Count Description
Liked 100 Mostly French/American rap, rock, electro
Disliked 95 25 metal, 25 classical, 25 disco, 20 rap
Neutral (Pop) ❌ Not included (user is neutral)

πŸ§ͺ Features

Extracted via Spotify API – "Get Audio Features for Several Tracks"

Feature Description
danceability How suitable the track is for dancing (0–1)
energy Perceived intensity (0–1)
key Musical key (0 = C, 1 = Cβ™―/Dβ™­...)
loudness Overall volume in dB (-60 to 0)
mode 1 = major, 0 = minor
speechiness Detects presence of speech (0–1)
acousticness Confidence measure of being acoustic (0–1)
instrumentalness Predicts presence of vocals (0–1)
liveness Live audience presence (0–1)
valence Positiveness of the song (0–1)
tempo Beats per minute (BPM)
duration_ms Duration of the song in milliseconds
time_signature Estimated time signature (e.g. 4 = 4/4)
liked (target) 1 = liked, 0 = disliked

πŸ” Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA)

βœ… 1. Missing Values

  • No missing values found

βœ… 2. Class Distribution

  • Liked (1): 100 songs
  • Disliked (0): 95 songs
  • Class is balanced

βœ… 3. Data Types

  • All features are numerical
  • Target (liked) is binary

βœ… 4. Summary Statistics

  • Energy, Danceability, Valence tend to be higher for liked songs
  • Acousticness and Instrumentalness higher in disliked songs

βœ… 5. Correlation Matrix

  • Strong positive correlation: energy ↔ loudness
  • Negative correlation: acousticness ↔ energy, valence

βœ… 6. Visual Highlights (Suggested)

  • Boxplots: energy, danceability by liked
  • Countplot: class balance of liked
  • Heatmap: correlation of features
  • Scatter: energy vs valence colored by liked

πŸ€– ML Use Cases

You can use this dataset to train:

  • Logistic Regression
  • Random Forest
  • KNN / SVM
  • ANN / XGBoost / LightGBM
  • Naive Bayes

πŸ“Š Visualizations

1. Boxplot: Energy Distribution by Liked

This shows how energy values are distributed for liked and disliked songs. Energy Boxplot


2. Boxplot: Danceability Distribution by Liked

This shows how danceability varies between liked and disliked songs. Danceability Boxplot


3. Scatter Plot: Energy vs Valence

This plot helps visualize clusters or spread of liked vs disliked songs based on energy and valence. Energy vs Valence


4. Correlation Heatmap

This heatmap shows how all audio features correlate with each other. Correlation Heatmap

5. Countplot: Liked vs Disliked Songs

This chart shows the number of songs in each class: 0 = Disliked, 1 = Liked.
It confirms that the dataset is nearly balanced.

Liked vs Disliked Countplot

πŸ“‰ Statistical Testing

To determine which features are statistically different between liked and disliked songs, a two-sample t-test was performed using:

Feature p-value Significance
danceability 0.0000 βœ… Significant
energy 0.0159 βœ… Significant
key 0.5371 ❌ Not significant
loudness 0.0000 βœ… Significant
mode 0.7418 ❌ Not significant
speechiness 0.0000 βœ… Significant
acousticness 0.0134 βœ… Significant
instrumentalness 0.0000 βœ… Significant
liveness 0.8924 ❌ Not significant
valence 0.0002 βœ… Significant
tempo 0.0000 βœ… Significant
duration_ms 0.0000 βœ… Significant
time_signature 0.0023 βœ… Significant

πŸ” Observation: - Features with p-value > 0.05 are statistically insignificant

- These features do not show a meaningful difference between liked and disliked songs

- We can safely remove the following features:
    liveness
    mode
    key

βœ… This simplifies the dataset and improves model performance by removing noise.

πŸ“ˆ Model Accuracy Comparison

Bar chart showing accuracy of different models used in the project.

Model Accuracy Chart