version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 11 215 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | context stringlengths 0 2.9k | context_formula stringlengths 0 905 | proofs list | proofs_formula list | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 15 193 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs list | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 4 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 89 3.09k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 654 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DeductionInstance | the grappling Cimabue occurs. | {B} | sent1: that the hotness does not occur and the grappling cottontail does not occur prevents that the grappling Limburger does not occur. sent2: if that the anaphrodisiacness occurs or the avowing imbrication does not occur or both is not correct the soberingness does not occur. sent3: the non-infinitivalness and the no... | sent1: (¬{BN} & ¬{JF}) -> {CK} sent2: ¬({L} v ¬{M}) -> ¬{K} sent3: (¬{HC} & ¬{CL}) sent4: ¬{AB} sent5: {N} -> ¬({L} v ¬{M}) sent6: ¬(¬{Q} & {R}) -> ¬{P} sent7: ¬{G} -> ({E} v {F}) sent8: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent9: {D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) sent10: ¬{P} -> ({N} & {O}) sent11: {C} -> (¬{B} & {A}) sent12: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ... | [
"sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;"
] | the grappling Cimabue does not occur. | ¬{B} | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the grappling Cimabue occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hotness does not occur and the grappling cottontail does not occur prevents that the grappling Limburger does not occur. sent2: if that the anaphrodisiacness occurs or the avowing imbrication does not occur or both is not correct the soberingnes... | sent8 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the cambium is a kind of a canecutter. | {D}{c} | sent1: that the cambium is not a faint or it is not a canecutter or both is true. sent2: something is phrasal if it is an endive. sent3: the fact that the Paiute is not a dewlap and is nuclear is false if it does not lionize imbroglio. sent4: if something is not a faint and not nuclear it is a fitter. sent5: the cambiu... | sent1: (¬{B}{c} v ¬{D}{c}) sent2: (x): {CF}x -> {JE}x sent3: ¬{F}{e} -> ¬(¬{G}{e} & {C}{e}) sent4: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}x sent5: (¬{D}{c} v ¬{B}{c}) sent6: ¬{D}{a} -> {B}{c} sent7: ¬{D}{a} -> {A}{c} sent8: {A}{cr} sent9: ¬{B}{a} -> {C}{c} sent10: ¬{F}{e} sent11: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent12: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{... | [
"sent12 & sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the cambium is nuclear.;"
] | [
"sent12 & sent13 & sent9 -> int1: {C}{c};"
] | the cambium is not a canecutter. | ¬{D}{c} | [
"sent11 -> int2: if the fact that the print is both not a Mogul and fitter is wrong it is not a kind of a fitter.; sent3 & sent10 -> int3: that that that the Paiute is not a dewlap and is nuclear is correct is false is not false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a dewlap but n... | 9 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cambium is a kind of a canecutter. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cambium is not a faint or it is not a canecutter or both is true. sent2: something is phrasal if it is an endive. sent3: the fact that the Paiute is not a dewlap and is nuclear is false if it does not lionize imbroglio. sent4: if someth... | sent12 & sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the cambium is nuclear.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the carapace does not surpass. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the carapace does not surpass. sent2: the carapace is not a kind of a mnemonic. sent3: that the bushman does not surpass is correct. sent4: if the fact that something is not punctual but it is an avoidance is false it does not surpass. | sent1: ¬{A}{a} sent2: ¬{N}{a} sent3: ¬{A}{jk} sent4: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the orach does not surpass. | ¬{A}{iq} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the orach does not surpass if that it is not punctual and it is an avoidance is not right.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the carapace does not surpass. ; $context$ = sent1: the carapace does not surpass. sent2: the carapace is not a kind of a mnemonic. sent3: that the bushman does not surpass is correct. sent4: if the fact that something is not punctual but it is an avoidance is false it does not surpass. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the prokaryote is a lithosphere. | {A}{a} | sent1: the prokaryote is a borderland. sent2: something does not lionize woodcarver but it is a perfectibility. sent3: if there exists something such that it does lionize woodcarver and it is a perfectibility then the prokaryote is a kind of a lithosphere. sent4: the prokaryote lionizes woodcarver. sent5: if something ... | sent1: {GG}{a} sent2: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent4: {AA}{a} sent5: (x): (¬{AB}x & {HT}x) -> {EO}{a} sent6: {FH}{a} sent7: (Ex): (¬{BH}x & {CE}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> {D}x sent9: (Ex): (¬{DF}x & {IE}x) sent10: (Ex): ¬{AA}x sent11: ({I}{e} & ¬{H}{e}) -> ¬{H}{d} sent12: {D}... | [
"sent2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | the prokaryote is not a kind of a lithosphere. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent8 -> int1: the cordovan is an imperial if the fact that it does not grapple nativism and it is not an imperial is not right.; sent17 -> int2: the stile browns if that it is both not a browns and exuvial does not hold.; sent11 & sent14 -> int3: the stile is not upland.; sent13 & int3 -> int4: that the stile doe... | 9 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the prokaryote is a lithosphere. ; $context$ = sent1: the prokaryote is a borderland. sent2: something does not lionize woodcarver but it is a perfectibility. sent3: if there exists something such that it does lionize woodcarver and it is a perfectibility then the prokaryote is a kind of a lithosphere. s... | sent2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it does avow stepfather and does not soak. | (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: there is something such that it guggles Californian. sent2: something avows stepfather. sent3: everything is dioecious a Kennewick. | sent1: (Ex): {DA}x sent2: (Ex): {AA}x sent3: (x): ({C}x & {D}x) | [] | [] | everything is a kind of biogenic thing that is not a skinny. | (x): ({EL}x & ¬{GU}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the Californian is a kind of dioecious thing that is a Kennewick.; int1 -> int2: the Californian is dioecious.; int2 -> int3: everything is dioecious.; int3 -> int4: the micrometeorite is dioecious.;"
] | 10 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does avow stepfather and does not soak. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it guggles Californian. sent2: something avows stepfather. sent3: everything is dioecious a Kennewick. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the skeletalness does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: that the Aleutianness occurs is not right if both the no-goness and the induction happens. sent2: that the headstand does not occur is brought about by that the grappling trade-last happens and the basket occurs. sent3: the referral occurs. sent4: the musculoskeletalness happens and the volley occurs. sent5: tha... | sent1: ({DI} & {IH}) -> ¬{G} sent2: ({EL} & {IK}) -> ¬{HG} sent3: {B} sent4: ({BT} & {GJ}) sent5: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) sent6: ¬{HM} sent7: ({FD} & {HQ}) -> ¬{IE} sent8: ({CQ} & {S}) sent9: ({BI} & {CE}) sent10: ({DD} & {DC}) -> ¬{DU} sent11: {P} sent12: ({IG} & {EA}) sent13: ({FQ} & {JA}) -> ¬{FM} sent14: {AG} sent15: (... | [
"sent17 & sent3 -> int1: both the entomologicalness and the referral happens.;"
] | [
"sent17 & sent3 -> int1: ({A} & {B});"
] | the skeletalness occurs. | {C} | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the skeletalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Aleutianness occurs is not right if both the no-goness and the induction happens. sent2: that the headstand does not occur is brought about by that the grappling trade-last happens and the basket occurs. sent3: the referral occurs. sent4: the... | sent17 & sent3 -> int1: both the entomologicalness and the referral happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the unguiculateness does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the grappling beta-adrenoceptor and the distempering happens if the uncovering does not occur. sent2: the example and the prelim occurs. sent3: the unguiculateness occurs if the example happens. sent4: the wanting occurs. sent5: the prelim happens. sent6: that the prodromalness does not occur leads to that the u... | sent1: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) sent2: ({A} & {B}) sent3: {A} -> {C} sent4: {AC} sent5: {B} sent6: ¬{G} -> ¬{F} sent7: {D} -> (¬{B} v ¬{A}) sent8: (¬{B} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{C} | [
"sent2 -> int1: the example occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the unguiculate does not occur. | ¬{C} | [] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the unguiculateness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the grappling beta-adrenoceptor and the distempering happens if the uncovering does not occur. sent2: the example and the prelim occurs. sent3: the unguiculateness occurs if the example happens. sent4: the wanting occurs. sent5: the prelim happens.... | sent2 -> int1: the example occurs.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | both the structuralness and the detailing occurs. | ({A} & {C}) | sent1: the zymoticness occurs. sent2: the fact that the yearning happens is true. sent3: the split and the catabolizing happens. sent4: that the prospecting happens hold. sent5: the marketing happens. sent6: the forcefulness happens. sent7: if the holozoicness happens then the acquiring happens. sent8: the retailing an... | sent1: {HD} sent2: {GH} sent3: ({HO} & {GI}) sent4: {IC} sent5: {DN} sent6: {D} sent7: {CJ} -> {IT} sent8: ({CQ} & {BD}) sent9: ({IG} & {JG}) sent10: ¬({H} & ¬{G}) -> ¬{F} sent11: {D} -> {C} sent12: {I} -> ¬({H} & ¬{G}) sent13: {CP} sent14: ({DL} & {GM}) sent15: {GI} sent16: {FP} sent17: {IT} sent18: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {D... | [
"sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the details happens.;"
] | [
"sent11 & sent6 -> int1: {C};"
] | the fact that the structuralness occurs and the details occurs is not true. | ¬({A} & {C}) | [] | 9 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = both the structuralness and the detailing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the zymoticness occurs. sent2: the fact that the yearning happens is true. sent3: the split and the catabolizing happens. sent4: that the prospecting happens hold. sent5: the marketing happens. sent6: the forcefulness happens. sent7: ... | sent11 & sent6 -> int1: the details happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the stretch does paganize and/or it is granulomatous is not correct. | ¬({C}{a} v {B}{a}) | sent1: the stretch is a sauce-alone if it is a petrel. sent2: the stretch is a kind of a sauce-alone. sent3: the stretch is Lao. sent4: the stretch is a sauce-alone if it is a Truman. sent5: the stretch organizes and/or it is a IVP. sent6: either the boa is a sauce-alone or it is an option or both. sent7: the ropewalk ... | sent1: {JH}{a} -> {A}{a} sent2: {A}{a} sent3: {CQ}{a} sent4: {BH}{a} -> {A}{a} sent5: ({AI}{a} v {CH}{a}) sent6: ({A}{bn} v {EO}{bn}) sent7: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{E}x) -> {E}{b} sent8: {CP}{a} -> {A}{a} sent9: {AD}{a} -> {II}{a} sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}{fo} v {BF}{fo}) sent11: ({JE}{a} v {C}{a}) sent12: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}... | [
"sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the stretch is granulomatous.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent15 & sent2 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | either the calcium does paganize or it does grapple calcium or both. | ({C}{fo} v {BF}{fo}) | [
"sent12 -> int2: if the stretch does not avow opened then it is not a sauce-alone but granulomatous.; sent14 & sent7 -> int3: the ropewalk is transoceanic.; int3 -> int4: the ropewalk does not closet and/or it is transoceanic.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it does not closet or it is transoceanic ... | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the stretch does paganize and/or it is granulomatous is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the stretch is a sauce-alone if it is a petrel. sent2: the stretch is a kind of a sauce-alone. sent3: the stretch is Lao. sent4: the stretch is a sauce-alone if it is a Truman. sent5: the stretch organizes and/... | sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the stretch is granulomatous.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the propagandist is feudatory and not a Warburg is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) | sent1: the hay is not feudatory. sent2: the non-resistant is a damascene if the schlock is not damascene. sent3: the propagandist is not handmade if the fact that the Fula is not a dreadnought and grapples evasion is incorrect. sent4: the fact that the haunt is not a Warburg is not incorrect. sent5: that the stibnite d... | sent1: ¬{A}{hq} sent2: {J}{f} -> {J}{e} sent3: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {H}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent4: ¬{B}{hi} sent5: ¬{M}{g} sent6: {J}{e} -> (¬{I}{d} & {K}{d}) sent7: ¬{M}{g} -> ({L}{g} & {J}{g}) sent8: ({HM}{a} & ¬{BI}{a}) sent9: (¬{I}{d} & {K}{d}) -> {I}{c} sent10: {B}{ie} sent11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) sent12: (x): (¬{C}x &... | [
"sent15 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent15 & sent19 -> hypothesis;"
] | the antheridiophore is not a Warburg. | ¬{B}{hk} | [
"sent12 -> int1: if the antheridiophore is not nosocomial but feudatory it is not a kind of a Warburg.; sent16 -> int2: if the fact that the propagandist is a bristletail but it does not match is not correct it is not a bristletail.; sent11 -> int3: that the propagandist is both a bristletail and not a matched is n... | 13 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the propagandist is feudatory and not a Warburg is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the hay is not feudatory. sent2: the non-resistant is a damascene if the schlock is not damascene. sent3: the propagandist is not handmade if the fact that the Fula is not a dreadnought and grapples evasion is incorrec... | sent15 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that it is not a kind of a sapsago and it does not lionize stalk. | (Ex): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) | sent1: if the fact that something does lionize stalk and is a sapsago does not hold then it does not avow Limburger. sent2: there exists something such that it does not avow poilu and avows print. sent3: if something is not absorbent that the print lionizes stalk and is a sapsago does not hold. sent4: there exists some... | sent1: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{CU}x sent2: (Ex): (¬{M}x & {BT}x) sent3: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) sent4: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent5: (Ex): ({DC}x & ¬{BB}x) sent6: (Ex): (¬{DC}x & ¬{CN}x) sent7: (Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{BK}x sent9: (x): {D}x -> ({E}x & ¬{A}x) sent10: ({F}{e} & {K}{e}) -> ¬{F}{c} sent11... | [
"sent18 & sent19 -> int1: the print is not a sapsago and it does not lionize stalk.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent18 & sent19 -> int1: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | there is something such that it is not compressible and it does not avow Limburger. | (Ex): (¬{BK}x & ¬{CU}x) | [
"sent8 -> int2: the print is incompressible if it does not linger.; sent9 -> int3: the Limburger is a Decalogue and does not linger if it is an inlay.; sent21 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not nectar-rich and it does grapple prelude does not hold.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the Limburger do... | 9 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not a kind of a sapsago and it does not lionize stalk. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does lionize stalk and is a sapsago does not hold then it does not avow Limburger. sent2: there exists something such that it does not avow poilu and avows print. sent... | sent18 & sent19 -> int1: the print is not a sapsago and it does not lionize stalk.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the guggling springbok occurs. | {A} | sent1: if the guggling springbok happens the sigmoidoscopy occurs. sent2: the avowing re-introduction occurs if the incapableness happens. sent3: that the truck happens does not hold if the fact that not the sigmoidoscopy but the truck occurs is not true. sent4: the avowing degradation does not occur. sent5: the sigmoi... | sent1: {A} -> {B} sent2: {DO} -> {IO} sent3: ¬(¬{B} & {HR}) -> ¬{HR} sent4: ¬{AU} sent5: (¬{B} & {C}) sent6: ¬{G} sent7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) sent8: {C} sent9: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{B} & {HR}) sent10: (¬{FT} & {EG}) sent11: ¬{G} -> (¬{D} & ¬{F}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guggling springbok happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the sigmoidoscopy happens.; sent5 -> int2: the sigmoidoscopy does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent5 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the trucking does not occur and the sedition occurs. | (¬{HR} & {IJ}) | [
"sent11 & sent6 -> int4: the mend does not occur and the oviparousness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the mending does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sigmoidoscopy does not occur and the truck happens is wrong.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the trucking does not occur.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the guggling springbok occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the guggling springbok happens the sigmoidoscopy occurs. sent2: the avowing re-introduction occurs if the incapableness happens. sent3: that the truck happens does not hold if the fact that not the sigmoidoscopy but the truck occurs is not true. sent... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the guggling springbok happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the sigmoidoscopy happens.; sent5 -> int2: the sigmoidoscopy does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if it is an agglomeration and it is not osmotic it ports is not right. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: something that is valid and is not a surfacing is Zolaesque. sent2: if something is a kind of an agglomeration but it is not osmotic it does port. sent3: there is something such that if it is a corpulence and it does not avow embryologist then it grapples blob. sent4: there exists something such that if it is an... | sent1: (x): ({HP}x & ¬{DE}x) -> {FR}x sent2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): ({AC}x & ¬{FP}x) -> {IH}x sent4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent5: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent6: (x): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the notochord is a port if it is an agglomeration and not osmotic.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the botanical is Zolaesque if it is valid and it does not surface. | ({HP}{bo} & ¬{DE}{bo}) -> {FR}{bo} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is an agglomeration and it is not osmotic it ports is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is valid and is not a surfacing is Zolaesque. sent2: if something is a kind of an agglomeration but it is not osmotic it does port. sent3: there is som... | sent2 -> int1: the notochord is a port if it is an agglomeration and not osmotic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the coachman ossifies. | {B}{aa} | sent1: if the fact that something is not a brambling and/or it is not tactful is false it does litter. sent2: there is nothing such that either it is not tactful or it does not append or both. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it ossifies and it avows IWW is not correct the coachman does not ossi... | sent1: (x): ¬(¬{AM}x v ¬{AA}x) -> {AG}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: {AB}{aa} sent5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: ¬({D}{a} & {E}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & {A}x) | [
"sent5 -> int1: the coachman ossifies if that it is not tactful and/or does not append is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the coachman is not tactful and/or does not append is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; sent2 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | if that the fact that the hawthorn is not a brambling and/or it is not tactful is incorrect is not incorrect it does litter. | ¬(¬{AM}{dp} v ¬{AA}{dp}) -> {AG}{dp} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the coachman ossifies. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a brambling and/or it is not tactful is false it does litter. sent2: there is nothing such that either it is not tactful or it does not append or both. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it ossifies and it... | sent5 -> int1: the coachman ossifies if that it is not tactful and/or does not append is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: the fact that the coachman is not tactful and/or does not append is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the bacteriophage is a kind of non-Ptolemaic thing that does not guggle radiometer. | (¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: if something is a kind of a fascista then the fact that it is not Ptolemaic and it does not guggle radiometer is not true. sent2: everything is not Ptolemaic. sent3: the bulrush does not guggle radiometer. sent4: everything is not cervine. | sent1: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x sent3: ¬{C}{aa} sent4: (x): ¬{EE}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the bulrush is not Ptolemaic.;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa};"
] | that the bacteriophage is not Ptolemaic and it does not guggle radiometer is not correct. | ¬(¬{A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent1 -> int2: if the bacteriophage is a fascista then the fact that it is not Ptolemaic and it does not guggle radiometer is not correct.;"
] | 4 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bacteriophage is a kind of non-Ptolemaic thing that does not guggle radiometer. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a fascista then the fact that it is not Ptolemaic and it does not guggle radiometer is not true. sent2: everything is not Ptolemaic. sent3: the bulrush does not guggle radiom... | sent2 -> int1: the bulrush is not Ptolemaic.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the Rhenish does not occur. | ¬{A} | sent1: the philatelicness occurs. sent2: the backstop happens. sent3: the slavery happens. sent4: the Rhenish occurs. sent5: that the high-low-jack happens is right. sent6: the grappling feminist occurs. sent7: the avowing lithomancy occurs. sent8: the atheist happens. sent9: the Rhenishness does not occur if that the ... | sent1: {CU} sent2: {GK} sent3: {GU} sent4: {A} sent5: {BG} sent6: {BU} sent7: {GC} sent8: {O} sent9: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} sent10: {FA} sent11: {GE} sent12: {AG} sent13: {P} sent14: {IS} sent15: {AH} sent16: {FG} sent17: {GH} sent18: {GB} sent19: {FH} sent20: {IP} | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Rhenishness does not occur. | ¬{A} | [] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the Rhenish does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the philatelicness occurs. sent2: the backstop happens. sent3: the slavery happens. sent4: the Rhenish occurs. sent5: that the high-low-jack happens is right. sent6: the grappling feminist occurs. sent7: the avowing lithomancy occurs. sent8: the atheist ha... | sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the acquisitiveness does not occur. | ¬{B} | sent1: the tip-off happens. sent2: if the grappling simultaneity occurs then the custom occurs. sent3: the grappling lotto happens. sent4: the avowing WWW occurs. sent5: if the dormantness occurs the adoption occurs. sent6: the omen happens. sent7: the avowing quinone happens. sent8: the embolism happens. sent9: the ac... | sent1: {FA} sent2: {FM} -> {R} sent3: {A} sent4: {ID} sent5: {BH} -> {FF} sent6: {DO} sent7: {AN} sent8: {BE} sent9: {A} -> {B} sent10: {AS} sent11: {AP} -> {FM} sent12: {FQ} sent13: {ET} sent14: {AA} -> {CU} sent15: {AM} sent16: {AT} | [
"sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the acquisitiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the tip-off happens. sent2: if the grappling simultaneity occurs then the custom occurs. sent3: the grappling lotto happens. sent4: the avowing WWW occurs. sent5: if the dormantness occurs the adoption occurs. sent6: the omen happens. sent7: the av... | sent9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the earthwork does not secede and is not a kind of a goblin is false. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: if something avows magnetization then it is not inexact. sent2: that the earthwork is not socialistic and it is not unrenewable is not true. sent3: the earthwork does not guggle serenade if the fact that there exists something such that that it does secede and does guggle serenade is false is not incorrect. sent... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{A}x sent2: ¬(¬{AF}{a} & ¬{GN}{a}) sent3: (x): ¬({B}x & {DP}x) -> ¬{DP}{a} sent4: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) sent6: ¬{F}{d} -> (¬{D}{d} & {E}{d}) sent7: ¬{F}{d} sent8: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent10: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent11: {E}{a} -> {... | [
"sent10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;"
] | there exists something such that it does not guggle serenade. | (Ex): ¬{DP}x | [
"sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the anglophile does not avow magnetization and does surf.; int1 -> int2: the anglophile does not avow magnetization.; int2 -> int3: something does not avow magnetization.;"
] | 9 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the earthwork does not secede and is not a kind of a goblin is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something avows magnetization then it is not inexact. sent2: that the earthwork is not socialistic and it is not unrenewable is not true. sent3: the earthwork does not guggle serenade if the fact t... | sent10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the cryptomonad guggles bimetal and does guggle mink is not incorrect. | ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) | sent1: if something is not a kind of a colored and/or it is not a gamecock the cryptomonad guggles mink. sent2: that the cryptomonad is not prehistoric and not a missionary is wrong. sent3: if the fact that something is not prehistoric and it is not a kind of a missionary is not correct it does guggle bimetal. sent4: t... | sent1: (x): (¬{D}x v ¬{C}x) -> {A}{aa} sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) sent3: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent4: ¬{E}{ha} -> ({B}{ha} & {D}{ha}) sent5: (Ex): (¬{D}x v ¬{C}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the cryptomonad does guggle bimetal if that the fact that it is non-prehistoric thing that is not a kind of a missionary is not wrong is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cryptomonad guggles bimetal.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the cryptomonad does guggle mink is correct.; int2 & int3 ... | [
"sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; int1 & sent2 -> int2: {B}{aa}; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: {A}{aa}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the boarfish is a kind of a gamecock. | {C}{ha} | [] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the cryptomonad guggles bimetal and does guggle mink is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a colored and/or it is not a gamecock the cryptomonad guggles mink. sent2: that the cryptomonad is not prehistoric and not a missionary is wrong. sent3: if the fact that somethin... | sent3 -> int1: the cryptomonad does guggle bimetal if that the fact that it is non-prehistoric thing that is not a kind of a missionary is not wrong is incorrect.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the cryptomonad guggles bimetal.; sent5 & sent1 -> int3: the fact that the cryptomonad does guggle mink is correct.; int2 & int3 -> hy... |
DeductionInstance | the kingsnake is not a bolide. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: something does not wink and does not grapple proprioceptor if it is a miller's-thumb. sent2: the kingsnake is a bolide if the Baptists does wink. sent3: the Sabbatarian does grapple proprioceptor. sent4: the kingsnake grapples proprioceptor. sent5: the fact that if something is not a kind of a wink then it is no... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) sent2: {A}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent3: {B}{ah} sent4: {B}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x sent6: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) sent7: {B}{aa} -> {C}{a} sent8: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent9: {ED}{a} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the Baptists is a wink and/or it grapples proprioceptor.; int1 & sent2 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: ({A}{aa} v {B}{aa}); int1 & sent2 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | the spackle is a kind of a bolide. | {C}{bu} | [
"sent8 -> int2: the spackle is a bolide if it winks.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the kingsnake is not a bolide. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not wink and does not grapple proprioceptor if it is a miller's-thumb. sent2: the kingsnake is a bolide if the Baptists does wink. sent3: the Sabbatarian does grapple proprioceptor. sent4: the kingsnake grapples proprioceptor. sent5: the ... | sent6 -> int1: the Baptists is a wink and/or it grapples proprioceptor.; int1 & sent2 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the kumquat does grapple linecut. | {A}{b} | sent1: if that the Limburger is a kind of a dither but it is not vagal is not correct then it is a Genoese. sent2: if there exists something such that it is infelicitous then the fact that the boarhound is not a Marshall and it is not infelicitous is not correct. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Genoese then it i... | sent1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent2: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({AA}x & {A}x) sent4: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{E}x) sent5: {A}{bi} sent6: {B}{a} -> {GR}{a} sent7: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{B}x sent8: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) sent9: {A}{a} sent10: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent11: ... | [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the Limburger is Genoese.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent10 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the kumquat does not grapple linecut. | ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent13 -> int2: the boarhound is infelicitous.; sent7 -> int3: if the narcotic is a branchiopod that is not a Marshall the fact that it is not a Genoese hold.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the kumquat does grapple linecut. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Limburger is a kind of a dither but it is not vagal is not correct then it is a Genoese. sent2: if there exists something such that it is infelicitous then the fact that the boarhound is not a Marshall and it is not infelicitous is not co... | sent1 & sent10 -> int1: the Limburger is Genoese.; sent19 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the heredity grapples archespore and is not a woodsman. | ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | sent1: the acylation is both not a dribbler and not an outgo if it is not a woodsman. sent2: the fact that the acylation is not a dribbler but it is an outgo does not hold. sent3: the fact that something grapples archespore but it is not a kind of a woodsman is not true if it lionizes moralism. sent4: the heredity is c... | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent3: (x): {B}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) sent4: {BP}{b} sent5: (x): {D}x -> {B}x sent6: ¬({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) -> {D}{b} sent7: {B}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent8: (¬{BR}{gm} & ¬{DQ}{gm}) sent9: ({AB}{ct} & ¬{DP}{ct}) sent10: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} sent11: ¬({A... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acylation is not a woodsman.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the acylation is not a dribbler and is not an outgo.; sent7 & sent17 -> int2: that the acylation is not a dribbler and it is not a kind of an outgo is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 ... | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); sent7 & sent17 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: {A}{a};"
] | the fact that the heredity does grapple archespore and is not a woodsman is not true. | ¬({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | [
"sent3 -> int5: if that the heredity lionizes moralism is correct the fact that it grapples archespore and it is not a woodsman is not true.; sent5 -> int6: if the heredity is Congregational the fact that it does lionize moralism is not incorrect.;"
] | 6 | 4 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the heredity grapples archespore and is not a woodsman. ; $context$ = sent1: the acylation is both not a dribbler and not an outgo if it is not a woodsman. sent2: the fact that the acylation is not a dribbler but it is an outgo does not hold. sent3: the fact that something grapples archespore but it is n... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acylation is not a woodsman.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the acylation is not a dribbler and is not an outgo.; sent7 & sent17 -> int2: that the acylation is not a dribbler and it is not a kind of an outgo is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> in... |
DeductionInstance | the baldpate is not virile. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the fact that the baldpate is a kind of a Honduran or it is not Wordsworthian or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a Turkish and it is oneiric does not hold if it is not prejudicial. sent3: if the fact that the baldpate is a Verdicchio or it does not guggle makeup or both does not h... | sent1: ¬({EL}{a} v ¬{IB}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{K}x -> ¬({J}x & {I}x) sent3: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{G}x) sent5: (¬{D}{d} & {F}{d}) -> ¬{D}{c} sent6: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent7: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}{d} & {F}{d}) sent8: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) sent9: ¬{D}{c} -> (¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent10: ¬(... | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the baldpate guggles cottager.; sent6 -> int2: if the baldpate guggles cottager it is virile.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the baldpate is not virile. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent13 -> int3: if that the chop is a argentinosaur but it is not a canton is not right it is not a argentinosaur.; sent4 -> int4: the fact that the chop is a argentinosaur but it does not canton is not correct if it is non-joyous.; sent14 -> int5: if that that the chop is Turkish and is oneiric is false hold then... | 12 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the baldpate is not virile. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the baldpate is a kind of a Honduran or it is not Wordsworthian or both does not hold. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a Turkish and it is oneiric does not hold if it is not prejudicial. sent3: if the fact that the baldpate is a V... | sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the baldpate guggles cottager.; sent6 -> int2: if the baldpate guggles cottager it is virile.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the acetate grapples Cynodon. | {A}{c} | sent1: the acetate does not grapple Cynodon if the fact that the cutworm does establish but it is not intestinal is false. sent2: if the cutworm is not a Mallon and does sallow the baldric establishes. sent3: if the baldric does establish then the acetate grapples Cynodon. sent4: the cutworm is not a Mallon and does sa... | sent1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} sent2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent3: {B}{b} -> {A}{c} sent4: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent5: ¬{AA}{a} sent6: (x): ¬{E}x -> {D}x sent7: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the baldric does establish.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the acetate does not grapple Cynodon hold. | ¬{A}{c} | [
"sent6 -> int2: if that the baldric does not clangor is not wrong it is dental.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the acetate grapples Cynodon. ; $context$ = sent1: the acetate does not grapple Cynodon if the fact that the cutworm does establish but it is not intestinal is false. sent2: if the cutworm is not a Mallon and does sallow the baldric establishes. sent3: if the baldric does establish then the acetate grapp... | sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the baldric does establish.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the derailing does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the anterogradeness occurs. sent2: the hackwork occurs. sent3: the electricalness occurs. sent4: the non-anterogradeness leads to that the farness and the derailing occurs. sent5: if that the anterogradeness happens and the homileticness does not occur is false the anterogradeness does not occur. sent6: if the a... | sent1: {B} sent2: {DS} sent3: {DT} sent4: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) sent5: ¬({B} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B} sent6: {D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{E}) sent7: {A} sent8: ¬{IB} sent9: ({AB} & {G}) -> ¬{CN} sent10: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the farness and the anterogradeness happens.;"
] | [
"sent7 & sent1 -> int1: ({A} & {B});"
] | the derailing happens. | {C} | [] | 8 | 2 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the derailing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the anterogradeness occurs. sent2: the hackwork occurs. sent3: the electricalness occurs. sent4: the non-anterogradeness leads to that the farness and the derailing occurs. sent5: if that the anterogradeness happens and the homileticness does not occur i... | sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the farness and the anterogradeness happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the haunt is a suprematist. | {B}{a} | sent1: the haunt is lobeliaceous and it does guggle knothole. sent2: the haunt is a suprematist and is lobeliaceous if there is something such that it does not grapple goateed. sent3: the haunt is lobeliaceous. sent4: the haunt is not lobeliaceous if the testator is both not non-theist and benevolent. sent5: if there e... | sent1: ({C}{a} & {GO}{a}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent3: {C}{a} sent4: ({E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: (x): ¬{AK}x -> ({A}{a} & {DQ}{a}) sent6: (Ex): ¬{C}x sent7: (x): ¬{FU}x -> ({AQ}{as} & {A}{as}) sent8: (Ex): {A}x sent9: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x sent10: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}{a} sent11: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -... | [] | [] | the haunt is not a kind of a suprematist. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"sent18 -> int1: the haunt is not a suprematist but it grapples goateed if it is not lobeliaceous.; sent16 -> int2: the testator is a theist and it is benevolent if it does not exalt.;"
] | 9 | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the haunt is a suprematist. ; $context$ = sent1: the haunt is lobeliaceous and it does guggle knothole. sent2: the haunt is a suprematist and is lobeliaceous if there is something such that it does not grapple goateed. sent3: the haunt is lobeliaceous. sent4: the haunt is not lobeliaceous if the testator... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fantail is a kind of a subterfuge. | {B}{b} | sent1: that the fantail does lionize charity and it is a kind of a Belarus is not right if the neckwear is not a kind of a Belarus. sent2: the neckwear is not a buttinsky. sent3: the fact that there is something such that that the fact that it does not sightsee and/or it is not a Weser is true does not hold is correct.... | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} & {A}{b}) sent2: ¬{HO}{a} sent3: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent4: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬{C}{b} -> ¬{B}{b} sent7: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v ¬{A}x) -> ¬{C}{a} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: (Ex): {AB}x... | [
"sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the neckwear is not a Belarus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fantail does lionize charity and is a kind of a Belarus is false.; sent12 -> int3: if that the fact that the fantail lionizes charity and is a Belarus is not incorrect is incorrect then it is not a subterfuge.; int2 & in... | [
"sent3 & sent9 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬({C}{b} & {A}{b}); sent12 -> int3: ¬({C}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fantail is a subterfuge. | {B}{b} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fantail is a kind of a subterfuge. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fantail does lionize charity and it is a kind of a Belarus is not right if the neckwear is not a kind of a Belarus. sent2: the neckwear is not a buttinsky. sent3: the fact that there is something such that that the fact that it does not... | sent3 & sent9 -> int1: the neckwear is not a Belarus.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the fantail does lionize charity and is a kind of a Belarus is false.; sent12 -> int3: if that the fact that the fantail lionizes charity and is a Belarus is not incorrect is incorrect then it is not a subterfuge.; int2 & int3 ->... |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is a Jamaican the fact that it is a purple and/or it is not a breakable is false. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) | sent1: there is something such that if it does caseate then it guggles buttock or does not lionize pustule or both. sent2: the fact that the assenter is responsive or does not avow strafe or both is not true if it is breakable. sent3: that either the assenter is a tucker or it does not avow nectary or both is not corre... | sent1: (Ex): {JG}x -> ({CL}x v ¬{C}x) sent2: {AB}{aa} -> ¬({IR}{aa} v ¬{HM}{aa}) sent3: {L}{aa} -> ¬({DD}{aa} v ¬{DM}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): {HM}x -> ¬({FQ}x v {HA}x) sent5: (x): {H}x -> ¬({AI}x v ¬{BB}x) sent6: (Ex): {CP}x -> ¬({BT}x v ¬{IB}x) sent7: {CA}{aj} -> ¬({AB}{aj} v ¬{AR}{aj}) sent8: (x): {IA}x -> ¬({GH}x v ¬{A}x)... | [
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent11 -> hypothesis;"
] | if the fact that the wringer avows weeper is right then the fact that it is uncooperative or is not a Jamaican or both is not correct. | {IA}{eu} -> ¬({GH}{eu} v ¬{A}{eu}) | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a Jamaican the fact that it is a purple and/or it is not a breakable is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does caseate then it guggles buttock or does not lionize pustule or both. sent2: the fact that the assenter is responsive or doe... | sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the prokaryote grapples charnel. | {C}{a} | sent1: if the fact that something grapples charnel but it is not a Kigali does not hold then it does not grapples charnel. sent2: the Latino is topographical. sent3: the prokaryote is microeconomic. sent4: the fact that the propenonitrile grapples charnel and is not a kind of a Kigali is incorrect if there exists somet... | sent1: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{E}x) -> ¬{C}x sent2: {B}{jg} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({C}{ap} & ¬{E}{ap}) sent5: ¬{G}{a} -> ({D}{a} & {F}{a}) sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({A}x v {B}x) sent7: (x): ({CO}x & ¬{IA}x) -> ¬{CC}x sent8: (x): ¬({G}x & {I}x) -> ¬{G}{a} sent9: (Ex): ¬({G}x & {I}x) sent10: ¬{B}{df} sent11: ¬{B}{a} sen... | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the prokaryote is microeconomic thing that is not topographical.; sent12 -> int2: the prokaryote does not grapple charnel if it is microeconomic and it is non-topographical.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent11 -> int1: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); sent12 -> int2: ({A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the propenonitrile is topographical. | {B}{ap} | [
"sent1 -> int3: if that that the propenonitrile grapples charnel but it is not a Kigali is wrong is correct then it does not grapples charnel.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: the prokaryote is not meteoric.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the prokaryote is radial-ply and it is classicistic.; int5 -> int6: that the prokaryote is rad... | 8 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the prokaryote grapples charnel. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something grapples charnel but it is not a Kigali does not hold then it does not grapples charnel. sent2: the Latino is topographical. sent3: the prokaryote is microeconomic. sent4: the fact that the propenonitrile grapples charnel an... | sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the prokaryote is microeconomic thing that is not topographical.; sent12 -> int2: the prokaryote does not grapple charnel if it is microeconomic and it is non-topographical.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is incautious and/or it is not a kind of a ununtrium then it is not a rippled. | (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: there exists something such that if it is not cautious it is not a kind of a rippled. sent2: there exists something such that if it is incautious and/or not a ununtrium it ripples. sent3: the sierra does not ripple if either it is incautious or it is a kind of a ununtrium or both. sent4: if the sierra is incauti... | sent1: (Ex): {AA}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: ({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({AA}x v {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent7: {BU}{aa} -> ¬{IB}{aa} sent8: (x): ({IF}x v ¬{FD}x) -> ¬{A}x sent9: (Ex): ¬{AB}x -> ¬{... | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | the flavivirus is not a mastoid if either it does grapple Jerez or it is not occipital or both. | ({IF}{ij} v ¬{FD}{ij}) -> ¬{A}{ij} | [
"sent8 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is incautious and/or it is not a kind of a ununtrium then it is not a rippled. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not cautious it is not a kind of a rippled. sent2: there exists something such that if it is incautious and/or not a ununtrium i... | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if the fact that it is not dipolar and is not non-Milanese is incorrect then it is a countinghouse. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: if the fact that the khakis is not a kind of a Milanese is not incorrect then that it is a countinghouse is true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not dipolar and is a Milanese the fact that it is a countinghouse is true. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is both dipolar... | sent1: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent3: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not dipolar and is not non-Milanese is incorrect then it is a countinghouse. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the khakis is not a kind of a Milanese is not incorrect then that it is a countinghouse is true. sent2: there exists something such th... | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fairing does not occur. | ¬{D} | sent1: that the impingement occurs and the grappling third occurs does not hold if the canonicness does not occur. sent2: either the tympanoplasty happens or the karate happens or both. sent3: the fairness does not occur if the impingement occurs and/or the grappling third happens. sent4: that the admiralty does not oc... | sent1: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {B}) sent2: ({FU} v {BB}) sent3: ({C} v {B}) -> ¬{D} sent4: (¬{IU} & {BG}) sent5: {IN} sent6: ({M} v {FK}) -> ¬{FS} sent7: {F} -> ¬({D} v ¬{E}) sent8: ¬{I} -> ({H} v {G}) sent9: ¬{A} sent10: ({DU} v {IK}) sent11: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) sent12: {C} -> ¬{D} sent13: ({N} & ¬{M}) -> ¬{L} sent14: ¬{L} -... | [] | [] | not the vomit but the unalikeness occurs. | (¬{IF} & {EQ}) | [] | 11 | 3 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fairing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the impingement occurs and the grappling third occurs does not hold if the canonicness does not occur. sent2: either the tympanoplasty happens or the karate happens or both. sent3: the fairness does not occur if the impingement occurs and/or the grapp... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the compartmentalization does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: if the depiction and/or the lionizing crossbill occurs the compartmentalization does not occur. sent2: the Moldovanness happens. sent3: the fact that the avowing horseshoe does not occur hold. sent4: the depiction occurs. sent5: the jigging occurs. sent6: the past does not occur. sent7: the duet happens or the i... | sent1: ({A} v {B}) -> ¬{C} sent2: {HN} sent3: ¬{GJ} sent4: {A} sent5: {IE} sent6: ¬{IS} sent7: ({GT} v {BI}) sent8: ({AL} v {FD}) -> ¬{BM} sent9: ¬{CO} | [
"sent4 -> int1: either the depiction happens or the lionizing crossbill occurs or both.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> int1: ({A} v {B}); sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the compartmentalization does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the depiction and/or the lionizing crossbill occurs the compartmentalization does not occur. sent2: the Moldovanness happens. sent3: the fact that the avowing horseshoe does not occur hold. sent4: the depiction occurs. sent5: the jigging oc... | sent4 -> int1: either the depiction happens or the lionizing crossbill occurs or both.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it does shower then it is not a codification and it is a semitrailer. | (Ex): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | sent1: that something that does guggle hypodermic is not an octogenarian and is a codification is correct. sent2: something is a codification and it is a semitrailer if it does shower. sent3: if the critter lionizes sequencer it is not a Antilocapridae and it does avow hydroxymethyl. sent4: that something is not a kind... | sent1: (x): {GH}x -> (¬{CK}x & {AA}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent3: {BE}{aa} -> (¬{BF}{aa} & {JC}{aa}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (x): {BN}x -> (¬{GJ}x & {FL}x) sent6: {EC}{aa} -> (¬{BG}{aa} & {IN}{aa}) sent7: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: (x): {CE}x -> (¬{DS}x & {DI}x) sent9: {I... | [
"sent4 -> int1: the fact that the critter is not a codification but a semitrailer is not wrong if it does shower.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the tempera is both not an octogenarian and a codification if that it guggles hypodermic is right. | {GH}{ha} -> (¬{CK}{ha} & {AA}{ha}) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does shower then it is not a codification and it is a semitrailer. ; $context$ = sent1: that something that does guggle hypodermic is not an octogenarian and is a codification is correct. sent2: something is a codification and it is a semitrailer if it does shower. ... | sent4 -> int1: the fact that the critter is not a codification but a semitrailer is not wrong if it does shower.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the avowing grinder occurs. | {A} | sent1: the disclosure occurs. sent2: the bosom does not occur. sent3: the excitation occurs. sent4: the neuroticness does not occur. sent5: the grappling sacrificer does not occur if the regulating does not occur. sent6: the lionizing determiner happens if the grappling messuage happens. sent7: the gargle does not occu... | sent1: {N} sent2: ¬{GH} sent3: {EP} sent4: ¬{ID} sent5: ¬{GN} -> ¬{FR} sent6: {FT} -> {BN} sent7: ¬{C} sent8: ¬(¬{D} & {E}) -> {C} sent9: ¬{G} sent10: {JJ} -> {IH} sent11: ¬({H} & ¬{I}) -> {G} sent12: ¬{HO} sent13: ¬{GE} -> ¬{AT} sent14: ¬{C} -> ¬{B} sent15: {A} -> {B} sent16: {AO} sent17: {G} -> {F} sent18: ¬{GU} sent... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avowing grinder occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the guggling messuage happens.; sent14 & sent7 -> int2: the guggling messuage does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent14 & sent7 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the avowing grinder happens. | {A} | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the avowing grinder occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the disclosure occurs. sent2: the bosom does not occur. sent3: the excitation occurs. sent4: the neuroticness does not occur. sent5: the grappling sacrificer does not occur if the regulating does not occur. sent6: the lionizing determiner happens if the gr... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the avowing grinder occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the guggling messuage happens.; sent14 & sent7 -> int2: the guggling messuage does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the grinning happens hold. | {A} | sent1: the fact that the starlight does not occur hold if the fact that the fact that the MRI does not occur and the avowing foxhole does not occur is incorrect hold. sent2: the starlight happens if the grinning occurs. sent3: that the MRI does not occur and the avowing foxhole does not occur is incorrect. | sent1: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} sent2: {A} -> {B} sent3: ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grinning happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the starlight happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the starlight does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the grinning happens hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the starlight does not occur hold if the fact that the fact that the MRI does not occur and the avowing foxhole does not occur is incorrect hold. sent2: the starlight happens if the grinning occurs. sent3: that the MRI does not o... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grinning happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the starlight happens.; sent1 & sent3 -> int2: the starlight does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the larceny does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the unreasonableness happens if the hemisphericness happens. sent2: that the unreasonableness happens or the sensing occurs or both prevents that the larceny occurs. sent3: the fact that that the squatting does not occur and the rhizotomy does not occur is false is correct. sent4: if the fact that the non-biblio... | sent1: {AB} -> {B} sent2: ({B} v {A}) -> ¬{C} sent3: ¬(¬{HR} & ¬{AO}) sent4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent5: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the unreasonableness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the unreasonableness happens and/or the sensing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent5 -> int1: {B}; int1 -> int2: ({B} v {A}); sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the larceny does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unreasonableness happens if the hemisphericness happens. sent2: that the unreasonableness happens or the sensing occurs or both prevents that the larceny occurs. sent3: the fact that that the squatting does not occur and the rhizotomy does not occur is... | sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the fact that the unreasonableness occurs is not incorrect.; int1 -> int2: the unreasonableness happens and/or the sensing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | if the blower is non-substantival and it is not a Ellington then it is cercarial. | (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | sent1: the blower is a fearfulness if it does guggle hollyhock and it does not avow oakum. sent2: if the blower is not substantival but a Ellington then it is cercarial. sent3: something that does grapple warehouser and does not guggle blower avows topminnow. sent4: if something does not guggle Podargidae and it is not... | sent1: ({JG}{aa} & ¬{IQ}{aa}) -> {GN}{aa} sent2: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent3: (x): ({BN}x & ¬{GR}x) -> {IJ}x sent4: (x): (¬{AH}x & ¬{FJ}x) -> {JC}x sent5: (x): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent6: (x): (¬{FS}x & ¬{CF}x) -> {GP}x sent7: (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{JF}{aa}) -> {CC}{aa} sent8: (x): (¬{EM}x & {BO}x) -> {ER}x se... | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = if the blower is non-substantival and it is not a Ellington then it is cercarial. ; $context$ = sent1: the blower is a fearfulness if it does guggle hollyhock and it does not avow oakum. sent2: if the blower is not substantival but a Ellington then it is cercarial. sent3: something that does grapple ware... | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fulminate does not occur. | ¬{C} | sent1: the avowing Adenium occurs and the combat occurs. sent2: the backgammon does not occur. sent3: that the archaeologicalness and the occupying happens leads to that the fulminate does not occur. sent4: the environmentalism does not occur. sent5: that the bridling does not occur is true. sent6: the dolomiticness do... | sent1: ({FB} & {IT}) sent2: ¬{G} sent3: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent4: ¬{HC} sent5: ¬{IU} sent6: ¬{CT} sent7: {HL} sent8: {B} sent9: {DR} sent10: {A} sent11: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} sent12: ¬{B} -> ({C} & {A}) sent13: {IS} | [
"sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the archaeologicalness and the occupying occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent10 & sent8 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fulminate happens. | {C} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fulminate does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the avowing Adenium occurs and the combat occurs. sent2: the backgammon does not occur. sent3: that the archaeologicalness and the occupying happens leads to that the fulminate does not occur. sent4: the environmentalism does not occur. sent5: that the b... | sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the archaeologicalness and the occupying occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the hit is a accountantship and is not unilateral does not hold. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: something is not a ex-husband but it is a kind of a nibbed if it does not grapple Lagostomus. sent2: something that is intramuscular is not unilateral. sent3: the hit is not unilateral if it is intramuscular. sent4: the wheedler is a erasure. sent5: something is a accountantship but it is not unilateral if it is... | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{E}x & {C}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AB}x sent3: {A}{aa} -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent4: {H}{d} sent5: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent6: {F}{d} -> ¬({D}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) sent7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & {B}x) sent8: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} sent9: {H}{d} -> {F}{d} sent10: ¬{AB}{aa} sent11: (¬{E}{c} & {C}{c... | [
"sent5 -> int1: if the hit is intramuscular then it is a kind of a accountantship and it is not unilateral.; sent12 -> int2: the hit is intramuscular.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); sent12 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the hit is both a accountantship and not unilateral does not hold. | ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"sent7 -> int3: if the roadrunner is a nibbed then that it is not intramuscular and it is representational is false.; sent1 -> int4: the shroud is not a ex-husband and is a nibbed if it does not grapple Lagostomus.; sent9 & sent4 -> int5: the wheedler lionizes wheedler.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: that the wheedler does... | 10 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the hit is a accountantship and is not unilateral does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a ex-husband but it is a kind of a nibbed if it does not grapple Lagostomus. sent2: something that is intramuscular is not unilateral. sent3: the hit is not unilateral if it is intramuscular. sent4... | sent5 -> int1: if the hit is intramuscular then it is a kind of a accountantship and it is not unilateral.; sent12 -> int2: the hit is intramuscular.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the Mennonite is not an efficiency hold. | ¬{A}{b} | sent1: if something does avow gloxinia then it does not avow beadle. sent2: that the Mennonite is not glacial and is an efficiency is incorrect. sent3: if that the illuminant is both not glacial and an inventory is false then the Mennonite is not a kind of a reversible. sent4: if the illuminant is not nonwashable it is... | sent1: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x sent2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {A}{b}) sent3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} sent4: ¬{CR}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent5: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent6: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({C}x & {B}x) sent7: (x): ¬{C}x sent8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent9: ({B}{gs} v ¬{C}{gs}) -> {B}{gs} sent10: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{A}{b} | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the Mennonite is not a kind of a reversible.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Mennonite is an efficiency. | {A}{b} | [
"sent6 -> int2: if the fact that the illuminant does not avow beadle is not false it is not non-informational and it is a reversible.; sent1 -> int3: if the illuminant does avow gloxinia it does not avow beadle.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the Mennonite is not an efficiency hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does avow gloxinia then it does not avow beadle. sent2: that the Mennonite is not glacial and is an efficiency is incorrect. sent3: if that the illuminant is both not glacial and an inventory is false then the Mennonite is no... | sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the Mennonite is not a kind of a reversible.; int1 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the fact that the smelt is the Humvee that does not avow stamen is not correct if the smelt is an informality is not true. | ¬({A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})) | sent1: if the fishery is surmountable then that it does avow stamen and is not a kind of a bad is wrong. sent2: that something is unseasonable but it is not a abducent is not right if it grapples Antrozous. sent3: that something is surmountable but it is not a bogy does not hold if it does guggle tower. sent4: if somet... | sent1: {R}{cf} -> ¬({AB}{cf} & ¬{IC}{cf}) sent2: (x): {AM}x -> ¬({CD}x & ¬{GF}x) sent3: (x): {DS}x -> ¬({R}x & ¬{HS}x) sent4: (x): {S}x -> ¬({FK}x & ¬{DC}x) sent5: (x): {AO}x -> ¬({EH}x & ¬{EQ}x) sent6: (x): {AN}x -> ¬({AQ}x & ¬{EA}x) sent7: (x): {GS}x -> ¬({CR}x & ¬{GK}x) sent8: (x): {AT}x -> ¬({BJ}x & ¬{AF}x) sent9: ... | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent13 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the fact that the smelt is the Humvee that does not avow stamen is not correct if the smelt is an informality is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fishery is surmountable then that it does avow stamen and is not a kind of a bad is wrong. sent2: that something is unseasonable but it is not a abdu... | sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the commissary is both not a Baikal and not joyous is not right. | ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | sent1: the bilirubin is not a polyphosphate. sent2: the fact that the commissary is a Baikal but it is not joyous is wrong. sent3: that the commissary is both not a Baikal and not joyous is not correct if the bilirubin is not a polyphosphate. | sent1: ¬{A}{a} sent2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the commissary is both not a Baikal and not joyous is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the bilirubin is not a polyphosphate. sent2: the fact that the commissary is a Baikal but it is not joyous is wrong. sent3: that the commissary is both not a Baikal and not joyous is not correct if the bil... | sent3 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the guggling plow happens. | {B} | sent1: if the turn occurs that the non-unopposableness and/or the guggling Sarcochilus occurs is false. sent2: the atheisticness happens. sent3: that the mapping does not occur results in that the guggling plow does not occur. sent4: if the aposiopeticness does not occur both the guggling plow and the non-atheisticness... | sent1: {H} -> ¬(¬{G} v {F}) sent2: {A} sent3: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} sent4: ¬{C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) sent5: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent7: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent8: ¬(¬{FE} & {IJ}) sent9: ¬{HL} sent10: ¬(¬{G} v {F}) -> ¬{E} sent11: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & {D}) | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that not the emirate but the mapping occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | the guggling plow occurs. | {B} | [] | 10 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the guggling plow happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the turn occurs that the non-unopposableness and/or the guggling Sarcochilus occurs is false. sent2: the atheisticness happens. sent3: that the mapping does not occur results in that the guggling plow does not occur. sent4: if the aposiopeticness does no... | sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that not the emirate but the mapping occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the waterproofing is a beadsman. | {A}{a} | sent1: if something is a detribalization it is not hydrostatics. sent2: something is a beadsman if it does lionize Thuja. sent3: if something is not unidimensional then it is a detribalization and it is a kind of a taurine. sent4: the histiocyte does lionize Thuja if there exists something such that the fact that it do... | sent1: (x): {E}x -> ¬{D}x sent2: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent3: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x) sent4: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) -> {B}{gs} sent5: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) sent6: ¬{AB}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: ¬(¬{BE}{a} & {AB}{a}) sent8: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent9: (x): {A}x -> {AB}x sent10: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}... | [
"sent2 -> int1: the waterproofing is a beadsman if it does lionize Thuja.;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: {B}{a} -> {A}{a};"
] | the waterproofing is not a beadsman. | ¬{A}{a} | [
"sent1 -> int2: the stick is not hydrostatics if that it is a detribalization is right.; sent3 -> int3: if the sojourner is not unidimensional then it is both a detribalization and taurine.; sent12 -> int4: the fact that the sojourner is not unidimensional is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the sojourner is both a det... | 11 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the waterproofing is a beadsman. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a detribalization it is not hydrostatics. sent2: something is a beadsman if it does lionize Thuja. sent3: if something is not unidimensional then it is a detribalization and it is a kind of a taurine. sent4: the histiocyte does lionize... | sent2 -> int1: the waterproofing is a beadsman if it does lionize Thuja.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the non-resistant is both not non-Kazakhstani and careful is not right. | ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | sent1: the non-resistant is careful if it does not lionize announcer. sent2: if the schlock does not grapple molter but it is intrastate the fact that the Charlotte is not intrastate hold. sent3: if the Charlotte is not intrastate then it does not lionize announcer and yells. sent4: the non-resistant does not lionize a... | sent1: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{a} sent2: (¬{E}{c} & {C}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} sent3: ¬{C}{b} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) sent4: ¬{A}{a} sent5: ¬{AC}{aa} sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | that the non-resistant is a Kazakhstani that is careful is not true. | ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the non-resistant is both not non-Kazakhstani and careful is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-resistant is careful if it does not lionize announcer. sent2: if the schlock does not grapple molter but it is intrastate the fact that the Charlotte is not intrastate hold. sent3: if the Charlotte i... | sent6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that something is both infinitival and not a harlequin-snake is false. | ¬((Ex): ({B}x & ¬{C}x)) | sent1: if something is runic then it is not a harlequin-snake. sent2: there is something such that it grapples secessionism. sent3: the halter is infinitival. sent4: if something is not a harlequin-snake it is tricentenary and it is infinitival. sent5: if there exists something such that it is tricentenary then the hal... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> ¬{C}x sent2: (Ex): {II}x sent3: {B}{a} sent4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: (Ex): ({DR}x & {AO}x) sent7: (Ex): {A}x | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the halter is a kind of infinitival thing that is not a harlequin-snake.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 & sent5 -> int1: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | something is a kind of a pseudoscorpion. | (Ex): {BJ}x | [
"sent4 -> int2: if the chelation is not a harlequin-snake it is tricentenary thing that is infinitival.; sent1 -> int3: if the chelation is not non-runic then it is not a harlequin-snake.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that something is both infinitival and not a harlequin-snake is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is runic then it is not a harlequin-snake. sent2: there is something such that it grapples secessionism. sent3: the halter is infinitival. sent4: if something is not a harlequin-snake it is t... | sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the halter is a kind of infinitival thing that is not a harlequin-snake.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the spellbinder is a kind of a potter. | {B}{aa} | sent1: the molter is a Plesianthropus and it is inshore if it is not a cipher. sent2: the zoologist is a radiophotograph but it does not entail if the GABA is not a Seiurus. sent3: if something that is not phonemic is a radiophotograph it does potter. sent4: the molter is not a cipher. sent5: the shaker is a kind of a ... | sent1: ¬{G}{a} -> ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) sent2: ¬{H}{b} -> ({C}{gf} & ¬{D}{gf}) sent3: (x): (¬{A}x & {C}x) -> {B}x sent4: ¬{G}{a} sent5: {I}{c} sent6: (x): {A}x -> {C}x sent7: {FF}{aa} sent8: (x): {E}x -> ¬{A}{gf} sent9: {IO}{aa} -> {A}{aa} sent10: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{B}x) -> ¬{B}x sent11: (x): {C}x -> {B}x sent12: {D}{aa} | [
"sent6 -> int1: if the spellbinder is phonemic then it is a kind of a radiophotograph.; sent11 -> int2: the spellbinder is a potter if it is a kind of a radiophotograph.;"
] | [
"sent6 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}; sent11 -> int2: {C}{aa} -> {B}{aa};"
] | the zoologist does potter. | {B}{gf} | [
"sent3 -> int3: the zoologist potters if it is non-phonemic thing that is a radiophotograph.; sent1 & sent4 -> int4: the molter is a Plesianthropus and inshore.; int4 -> int5: the molter is a kind of a Plesianthropus.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a Plesianthropus.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the zoo... | 6 | 3 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the spellbinder is a kind of a potter. ; $context$ = sent1: the molter is a Plesianthropus and it is inshore if it is not a cipher. sent2: the zoologist is a radiophotograph but it does not entail if the GABA is not a Seiurus. sent3: if something that is not phonemic is a radiophotograph it does potter. ... | sent6 -> int1: if the spellbinder is phonemic then it is a kind of a radiophotograph.; sent11 -> int2: the spellbinder is a potter if it is a kind of a radiophotograph.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the Afro-wig is not upstream is right. | ¬{B}{aa} | sent1: something is non-upstream if it is not a pteridophyte. sent2: the stibnite is not antimagnetic. sent3: the fact that the stibnite is antimagnetic and it is a pteridophyte does not hold. sent4: the Afro-wig is not Frankish. sent5: the stibnite does not garner. sent6: if the fact that the Afro-wig is antimagnetic ... | sent1: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{B}x sent2: ¬{AB}{a} sent3: ¬({AB}{a} & {A}{a}) sent4: ¬{HO}{aa} sent5: ¬{AA}{a} sent6: ¬({AB}{aa} & {A}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent7: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{T}{a} sent9: ¬{A}{a} sent10: (x): ¬({DB}x & {IS}x) -> ¬{FU}x sent11: ¬{JI}{a} sent12: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B... | [
"sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the Afro-wig garners and is antimagnetic is true is false then it is not upstream.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the Afro-wig does garner and is antimagnetic is not right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent12 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Afro-wig is not upstream is right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is non-upstream if it is not a pteridophyte. sent2: the stibnite is not antimagnetic. sent3: the fact that the stibnite is antimagnetic and it is a pteridophyte does not hold. sent4: the Afro-wig is not Frankish. sent5: t... | sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the fact that the Afro-wig garners and is antimagnetic is true is false then it is not upstream.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the fact that the Afro-wig does garner and is antimagnetic is not right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the ventricle is haemophilic but it is not unemployable if it is not a ravine. | ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | sent1: that if the ventricle is not heavenly the ventricle is a ravine that does not attack filly is not false. sent2: something is haemophilic but it is not unemployable if it is not a kind of a ravine. sent3: something boxes and is not a conjugation if it does not overtake Zealander. sent4: something that does not yi... | sent1: ¬{ET}{aa} -> ({A}{aa} & ¬{DM}{aa}) sent2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent3: (x): ¬{BT}x -> ({Q}x & ¬{HP}x) sent4: (x): ¬{AU}x -> ({AG}x & ¬{HJ}x) sent5: {IH}{aa} -> ({HJ}{aa} & ¬{A}{aa}) sent6: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent7: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent8: (x): ¬{EO}x -> ({HU}x & ¬{GB}x) sent9: ¬{AR}{ej} -... | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 16 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the ventricle is haemophilic but it is not unemployable if it is not a ravine. ; $context$ = sent1: that if the ventricle is not heavenly the ventricle is a ravine that does not attack filly is not false. sent2: something is haemophilic but it is not unemployable if it is not a kind of a ravine. sent3: s... | sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the shimmy is not corneal. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: the shawny is a traveled. sent2: that the shimmy regenerates is not false if that it is a traveled and passable is correct. sent3: the Singer is a baron but it is not corneal. sent4: the shimmy is a Cassiope. sent5: the shimmy is a kind of a circumstances if it is areal. sent6: if something is regenerate it is c... | sent1: {AA}{bi} sent2: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} sent3: ({II}{de} & ¬{A}{de}) sent4: {FE}{a} sent5: {BI}{a} -> {AH}{a} sent6: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent7: {BO}{a} sent8: ({IN}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> {HK}{a} sent9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the shimmy is regenerate.; sent6 -> int2: the shimmy is corneal if it regenerates.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent9 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent6 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the shimmy is not corneal. ; $context$ = sent1: the shawny is a traveled. sent2: that the shimmy regenerates is not false if that it is a traveled and passable is correct. sent3: the Singer is a baron but it is not corneal. sent4: the shimmy is a Cassiope. sent5: the shimmy is a kind of a circumstances i... | sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the shimmy is regenerate.; sent6 -> int2: the shimmy is corneal if it regenerates.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if it is nephritic and it is not a kind of an afferent it determines hysterocatalepsy is false. | ¬((Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Astana and it is not a Skaw hold it attacks spam. sent2: if the Modicon is both nephritic and non-afferent it does determine hysterocatalepsy. sent3: there is something such that if it is acarpelous a linsey-woolsey it does interpolate. sent4: that there exists so... | sent1: (Ex): ({AO}x & ¬{BN}x) -> {S}x sent2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent3: (Ex): ({FU}x & {IA}x) -> {CU}x sent4: (Ex): ({HT}x & {FL}x) -> {HE}x sent5: ({IT}{aa} & ¬{AC}{aa}) -> {DE}{aa} sent6: ({B}{aa} & {H}{aa}) -> {BU}{aa} sent7: ({AA}{ar} & {CN}{ar}) -> {FQ}{ar} | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is nephritic and it is not a kind of an afferent it determines hysterocatalepsy is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it is a Astana and it is not a Skaw hold it attacks spam. sent2: if the Modicon is both nephritic an... | sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the junction is not non-noxious. | {B}{b} | sent1: that the junction is not a peasanthood and does attack ditch is wrong. sent2: the pewee is not noxious. sent3: the fact that the junction does not attack monk and is a TURP if the pewee is not a peasanthood is correct. sent4: if that something is proximal but it does not attack ditch is right it does not overtak... | sent1: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b}) sent2: ¬{B}{a} sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) sent4: (x): ({E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x sent5: ¬{B}{ek} sent6: ¬{A}{a} -> {AB}{b} sent7: ¬{A}{a} sent8: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) sent9: {AB}{b} sent10: ¬{AB}{b} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {A}{a}) sent11: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {D}{b}) -> {A}{b} sent12: (¬{IT}{b} ... | [
"sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the junction does not attack monk but it is a kind of a TURP.; int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent7 -> int1: (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis;"
] | the pewee does not attack monk. | ¬{AA}{a} | [
"sent11 & sent1 -> int2: the junction is a peasanthood.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the junction is not non-noxious. ; $context$ = sent1: that the junction is not a peasanthood and does attack ditch is wrong. sent2: the pewee is not noxious. sent3: the fact that the junction does not attack monk and is a TURP if the pewee is not a peasanthood is correct. sent4: if that something is prox... | sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the junction does not attack monk but it is a kind of a TURP.; int1 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an advocacy it is non-existentialist does not hold. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x) | sent1: if something does determine mutability then it determines Lolo. sent2: something is not existentialist if it is an advocacy. | sent1: (x): {H}x -> {ES}x sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬{C}x | [
"sent2 -> int1: the armband is not a existentialist if it is a kind of an advocacy.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a kind of an advocacy it is non-existentialist does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does determine mutability then it determines Lolo. sent2: something is not existentialist if it is an advocacy. ; $proof$ = | sent2 -> int1: the armband is not a existentialist if it is a kind of an advocacy.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the reshuffle occurs. | {A} | sent1: the duodenalness occurs if the fact that both the damaging and the non-allotropicness happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that either the overtaking viverrine does not occur or the overtaking schematization happens or both is not true if the mistrial happens. sent3: the fact that the damaging and the non-allo... | sent1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} sent2: {E} -> ¬(¬{C} v {D}) sent3: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent4: ¬{EQ} -> {EP} sent5: {G} -> ¬(¬{E} & {F}) sent6: ¬(¬{C} v {D}) -> ¬{B} sent7: ¬(¬{E} & {F}) -> {E} sent8: ¬{I} -> ({H} & {G}) | [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the duodenalness occurs.;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: {B};"
] | the urbanness occurs. | {HI} | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the reshuffle occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the duodenalness occurs if the fact that both the damaging and the non-allotropicness happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that either the overtaking viverrine does not occur or the overtaking schematization happens or both is not true if the mistrial happens.... | sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the duodenalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Signora and is a Lyginopteris is not true it is a kind of a Tahitian. | (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: there is something such that if it is not an error and it is a auscultation then it is a hod. sent2: if that something does not determine asyndeton but it rejoices is incorrect then it is a Signora. sent3: that there is something such that if it is not a Odontophorus it does alternate hold. sent4: the fact that ... | sent1: (Ex): (¬{GT}x & {EK}x) -> {D}x sent2: (x): ¬(¬{HQ}x & {IT}x) -> {AA}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{FM}x -> {IC}x sent4: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent5: ¬{AB}{aa} -> {IM}{aa} sent6: ¬{DS}{aa} -> {GN}{aa} sent7: (Ex): ¬{FB}x -> {O}x sent8: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent9: (Ex): {HE}x -> {GK}x sent10: ¬(¬{FM}{q... | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | if that the beaker does not determine asyndeton but it does rejoice is wrong then it is a kind of a Signora. | ¬(¬{HQ}{br} & {IT}{br}) -> {AA}{br} | [
"sent2 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Signora and is a Lyginopteris is not true it is a kind of a Tahitian. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not an error and it is a auscultation then it is a hod. sent2: if that something does not determine asyndeton but it r... | sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that the fact that it is not daisylike and is counterclockwise is incorrect. | (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) | sent1: there is something such that that it is not inconstant and it is continental is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that it is a Arabic. sent3: if there exists something such that it is Arabic the fact that the North is not daisylike but it is counterclockwise does not hold. sent4: that the North doe... | sent1: (Ex): ¬(¬{ID}x & {DG}x) sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) sent4: ¬({AD}{a} & {FE}{a}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the North is non-daisylike and counterclockwise does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent3 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is not daisylike and is counterclockwise is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is not inconstant and it is continental is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that it is a Arabic. sent3: if there exists somethi... | sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the North is non-daisylike and counterclockwise does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the cellist is a governess and/or it is not syllabic. | ({A}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) | sent1: the gentian does not rust. sent2: if the fact that the gentian determines Koran and/or it is a rust is wrong the fleece is not a governess. sent3: if the spicebush is not Stravinskyan that it does not release and does attack diversion is wrong. sent4: the crawlspace is a kind of a rust and/or it is not a submari... | sent1: ¬{AB}{aa} sent2: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent3: ¬{K}{c} -> ¬(¬{I}{c} & {J}{c}) sent4: ({AB}{gr} v ¬{IN}{gr}) sent5: ¬({AB}{aa} v {A}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬(¬{D}{he} & {F}{he}) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x v {HT}x) sent8: (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} sent9: ¬{G}{a} -> ({C}{he} & {E}{he}) sent10: ¬{... | [
"sent16 -> int1: that the gentian does determine Koran and/or does rust is not correct.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the fleece is not a kind of a governess.;"
] | [
"sent16 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); sent2 & int1 -> int2: ¬{A}{a};"
] | that the cellist is a kind of a governess and/or it is not syllabic is false. | ¬({A}{b} v ¬{C}{b}) | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the cellist is a governess and/or it is not syllabic. ; $context$ = sent1: the gentian does not rust. sent2: if the fact that the gentian determines Koran and/or it is a rust is wrong the fleece is not a governess. sent3: if the spicebush is not Stravinskyan that it does not release and does attack diver... | sent16 -> int1: that the gentian does determine Koran and/or does rust is not correct.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the fleece is not a kind of a governess.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the captive is not a sewage hold. | ¬{D}{b} | sent1: either the hexestrol is naive or it does not wet or both. sent2: if the Modicon does not attack Modicon the captive is a sewage. sent3: if that something does determine stem but it does not wet is false it does not determine stem. sent4: the hexestrol either is not a sewage or is not a candor or both. sent5: the... | sent1: ({A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) sent2: ¬{E}{c} -> {D}{b} sent3: (x): ¬({BQ}x & ¬{B}x) -> ¬{BQ}x sent4: (¬{D}{a} v ¬{C}{a}) sent5: ¬{T}{b} sent6: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} sent7: (¬{FD}{b} v ¬{BI}{b}) sent8: ¬{C}{hh} sent9: (¬{EF}{fu} v ¬{D}{fu}) sent10: ¬{A}{b} -> ¬({BQ}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) sent11: (¬{C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) sent12: (¬{A}{b} v ... | [
"sent18 -> int1: either the hexestrol is not naive or it is not wet or both.;"
] | [
"sent18 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a});"
] | the metallurgist does not determine stem and/or does not stalemate. | (¬{BQ}{ih} v ¬{DQ}{ih}) | [
"sent3 -> int2: if the fact that the hexestrol determines stem and is not wet is incorrect then it does not determines stem.;"
] | 8 | 3 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the captive is not a sewage hold. ; $context$ = sent1: either the hexestrol is naive or it does not wet or both. sent2: if the Modicon does not attack Modicon the captive is a sewage. sent3: if that something does determine stem but it does not wet is false it does not determine stem. sent4... | sent18 -> int1: either the hexestrol is not naive or it is not wet or both.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the poison is an imbalance but it is not a habit is not true. | ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: the poison is a birdie but it does not transplant. sent2: the Angle is a roof and does not habit if there is something such that it does striate. sent3: the poison is a kind of verbal thing that determines Whitehorse if it is not eusporangiate. sent4: if something is bisectional then the poison is a kind of an i... | sent1: ({CP}{a} & ¬{HH}{a}) sent2: (x): {FP}x -> ({EF}{ih} & ¬{C}{ih}) sent3: ¬{J}{a} -> ({F}{a} & {I}{a}) sent4: (x): {A}x -> ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: (Ex): {A}x sent6: (x): {A}x -> {B}{a} sent7: (Ex): ¬({H}x & {G}x) sent8: {B}{a} sent9: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent10: (x): (¬{G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x sent11: (x): ... | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the poison is a kind of an imbalance that is not a habit does not hold. | ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent11 -> int1: that the poison is an imbalance but it does not habit does not hold if it is not bisectional.; sent9 -> int2: if that the poison is not a glycerogelatin but it is bisectional is wrong then it is not bisectional.; sent12 -> int3: that the poison is not a kind of a glycerogelatin but it is bisectiona... | 7 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the poison is an imbalance but it is not a habit is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the poison is a birdie but it does not transplant. sent2: the Angle is a roof and does not habit if there is something such that it does striate. sent3: the poison is a kind of verbal thing that determines Wh... | sent5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the nibbler is a gleam. | {B}{aa} | sent1: the nibbler is homeopathic. sent2: that the fact that the ironman is not Gallic but it is a settler is wrong is right. sent3: something is not incredible but it is a gleam if it is not meteorologic. sent4: if the cards is not incredible but it is a gleam then the batholith is homeopathic. sent5: if something is ... | sent1: {AA}{aa} sent2: ¬(¬{I}{d} & {G}{d}) sent3: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent4: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> {AA}{eu} sent5: (x): ({GK}x & ¬{GA}x) -> ¬{DT}x sent6: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent7: (x): {C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) sent8: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent9: (x): ¬{E}x sent10: ¬{AC}{ab} sent11: ¬{AB}{aa... | [
"sent8 -> int1: the nibbler is not a gleam if it is homeopathic and does not overtake Jackson.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the nibbler is homeopathic but it does not overtake Jackson.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the batholith is homeopathic. | {AA}{eu} | [
"sent3 -> int3: if the cards is non-meteorologic then it is a kind of non-incredible thing that does gleam.; sent2 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-Gallic thing that is a kind of a settler is incorrect.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the nibbler is a gleam. ; $context$ = sent1: the nibbler is homeopathic. sent2: that the fact that the ironman is not Gallic but it is a settler is wrong is right. sent3: something is not incredible but it is a gleam if it is not meteorologic. sent4: if the cards is not incredible but it is a gleam then ... | sent8 -> int1: the nibbler is not a gleam if it is homeopathic and does not overtake Jackson.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the nibbler is homeopathic but it does not overtake Jackson.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the Sauk either overtakes Monothelitism or does criticize or both is false. | ¬({A}{c} v {C}{c}) | sent1: the mountainside does not overtake deism. sent2: there is something such that it is a ripsaw. sent3: the mountainside does not overtake deism and it is not a immodesty. sent4: if the mountainside does not overtake deism and is not a immodesty the beaugregory is a kind of a choc. sent5: if something does overtake... | sent1: ¬{AA}{a} sent2: (Ex): {F}x sent3: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent4: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent5: (x): {A}x -> {GI}x sent6: (x): {B}x -> ({A}{c} v {C}{c}) sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x v {C}x) sent8: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent9: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent10: (x): ¬{E}x sent11: ({AB}{a} & ¬{A}{... | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the beaugregory is a kind of a choc.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a choc.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 -> int2: (Ex): {B}x; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the Sauk overtakes Monothelitism and/or does criticize is wrong. | ¬({A}{c} v {C}{c}) | [
"sent7 -> int3: that the Sauk overtakes Monothelitism and/or does criticize does not hold if it is not a choc.; sent10 -> int4: that the beaugregory is nonlinear is not correct.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the Sauk either overtakes Monothelitism or does criticize or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the mountainside does not overtake deism. sent2: there is something such that it is a ripsaw. sent3: the mountainside does not overtake deism and it is not a immodesty. sent4: if the mountainsid... | sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the beaugregory is a kind of a choc.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a choc.; int2 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the secession does not occur and the Ford happens is false. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | sent1: the wholesaling does not occur but the suttee happens. sent2: if the billing does not occur the fact that not the secession but the Ford happens does not hold. sent3: if the bill occurs then not the secession but the Ford happens. sent4: not the siliceousness but the ventilatoriness occurs if the geneticness occ... | sent1: (¬{DJ} & {EM}) sent2: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent3: {A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: {FP} -> (¬{GL} & {CP}) sent5: (¬{CR} & {IQ}) sent6: {A} -> ¬{AA} sent7: {B} -> ({A} & ¬{FA}) sent8: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) sent9: {C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) sent10: {A} sent11: {DT} sent12: (¬{C} & ¬{D}) -> {DS} sent13: ¬{E} -> ({D} & {C})... | [
"sent3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the secession does not occur but the Ford happens does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | [] | 8 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the secession does not occur and the Ford happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the wholesaling does not occur but the suttee happens. sent2: if the billing does not occur the fact that not the secession but the Ford happens does not hold. sent3: if the bill occurs then not the secession b... | sent3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the buckboard is a toponymy. | {D}{b} | sent1: the denim is sociological. sent2: there is something such that it does overtake seaquake and/or it is a kind of a fiduciary. sent3: if the ironmongery is a kind of a perishable the buckboard is a toponymy. sent4: either something is a toponymy or it is perishable or both. sent5: if there is something such that i... | sent1: {EE}{hc} sent2: (Ex): ({A}x v {B}x) sent3: {C}{a} -> {D}{b} sent4: (Ex): ({D}x v {C}x) sent5: (x): {B}x -> {C}{a} sent6: {D}{a} sent7: (x): ({A}x v {B}x) -> {C}{a} | [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the ironmongery is a perishable.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent7 -> int1: {C}{a}; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the buckboard is a toponymy. ; $context$ = sent1: the denim is sociological. sent2: there is something such that it does overtake seaquake and/or it is a kind of a fiduciary. sent3: if the ironmongery is a kind of a perishable the buckboard is a toponymy. sent4: either something is a toponymy or it is pe... | sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the ironmongery is a perishable.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the radicle is a ngultrum. | {B}{a} | sent1: if the fact that the newcomer is not a peripheral hold it is glomerular and it is a kind of a Vila. sent2: if the newcomer is a evolutionist but it is not cytokinetic it is peripheral. sent3: the radicle is not a ngultrum if it is not glomerular. sent4: the radicle is not glomerular. sent5: the newcomer is a kin... | sent1: ¬{F}{b} -> ({A}{b} & {E}{b}) sent2: ({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> {F}{b} sent3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} sent4: ¬{A}{a} sent5: ({H}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) sent6: (x): {D}x -> ({C}x & ¬{B}x) | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;"
] | the Sodom is not glomerular. | ¬{A}{dj} | [
"sent6 -> int1: the radicle is a interestedness and not a ngultrum if it is promotional.; sent2 & sent5 -> int2: the newcomer is a peripheral.; int2 -> int3: something is peripheral.;"
] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the radicle is a ngultrum. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the newcomer is not a peripheral hold it is glomerular and it is a kind of a Vila. sent2: if the newcomer is a evolutionist but it is not cytokinetic it is peripheral. sent3: the radicle is not a ngultrum if it is not glomerular. sent4: the... | sent3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the gangplank is not a Martian. | ¬{C}{a} | sent1: the overcompensation is not a kind of a meerkat if there is something such that the fact that it is a meerkat and is Martian is incorrect. sent2: if something is a Housatonic then it is not a Martian. sent3: if an unintelligible thing toys then the amphotericin is not a kind of a Housatonic. sent4: the wimple is... | sent1: (x): ¬({A}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}{hc} sent2: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x sent3: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{B}{b} sent4: (¬{D}{c} & {E}{c}) sent5: {A}{a} sent6: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}x sent8: {A}{do} | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the gangplank is a Housatonic.; sent2 -> int2: if the gangplank is a Housatonic the fact that it is not a kind of a Martian hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent2 -> int2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the overcompensation is a Housatonic is not incorrect. | {B}{hc} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the gangplank is not a Martian. ; $context$ = sent1: the overcompensation is not a kind of a meerkat if there is something such that the fact that it is a meerkat and is Martian is incorrect. sent2: if something is a Housatonic then it is not a Martian. sent3: if an unintelligible thing toys then the amp... | sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the gangplank is a Housatonic.; sent2 -> int2: if the gangplank is a Housatonic the fact that it is not a kind of a Martian hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the prosecution and/or the non-Platonicness occurs is wrong. | ¬({C} v ¬{D}) | sent1: if the habanera occurs then that the overtaking kith and/or the scalableness happens is not right. sent2: the fact that the fact that the dousing happens or the cranialness does not occur or both is true does not hold. sent3: that either the determining globule happens or the multiplication does not occur or bot... | sent1: {IO} -> ¬({BS} v ¬{DJ}) sent2: ¬({EH} v ¬{M}) sent3: ¬({CP} v ¬{DB}) sent4: {AC} sent5: ¬({EE} v ¬{FU}) sent6: ¬({J} v ¬{IC}) sent7: ({A} & {B}) sent8: ¬{G} -> ({IP} & {F}) sent9: ¬{G} sent10: ({BH} & {CC}) sent11: ¬({HM} v ¬{EN}) sent12: {A} -> {D} sent13: {D} sent14: {B} | [
"sent7 -> int1: the grudge happens.;"
] | [
"sent7 -> int1: {A};"
] | the larvalness and the continentalness happens. | ({IP} & {CF}) | [
"sent8 & sent9 -> int2: both the larvalness and the vaudeville happens.; int2 -> int3: the larvalness happens.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the prosecution and/or the non-Platonicness occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the habanera occurs then that the overtaking kith and/or the scalableness happens is not right. sent2: the fact that the fact that the dousing happens or the cranialness does not occur or both is true does ... | sent7 -> int1: the grudge happens.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that that the S is not a kind of the OPV but it broadcasts does not hold if the S is not a rapport is wrong. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa})) | sent1: the fact that something does not overtake heel but it is a infructescence is incorrect if the fact that it is not a kind of an outlet is not wrong. sent2: if something is a capstone then that that it does not overtake beech and it is a curacy is true is incorrect. sent3: the fact that that something does not hyd... | sent1: (x): ¬{GB}x -> ¬(¬{JB}x & {IC}x) sent2: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{GQ}x & {K}x) sent3: (x): ¬{CD}x -> ¬(¬{JD}x & {DA}x) sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) sent6: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent7: {CN}{aa} -> ¬(¬{DN}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent8: ¬{HH}{bi} -> (¬{AD}{bi} & {CN}{bi}) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the fact that that the S is not a kind of the OPV but it broadcasts does not hold if the S is not a rapport is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not overtake heel but it is a infructescence is incorrect if the fact that it is not a kind of an outlet is not wrong. sent2: if somethin... | sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if that it is not undue is correct then it is a Fregatidae and it does attack caramel is false. | ¬((Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of an ostrich then it is a kind of a Monothelitism and it is Stoic. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a granule then it is testaceous and it is a Hohenzollern. sent3: the fact that the gantlet is a Fregatidae and it attacks caramel is not wrong if it is... | sent1: (Ex): {DT}x -> ({CG}x & {JI}x) sent2: (Ex): ¬{AF}x -> ({AS}x & {GL}x) sent3: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent4: (Ex): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent5: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ({U}x & {IR}x) sent6: ¬{A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) sent8: (x): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x sent9: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) s... | [
"sent7 -> int1: the gantlet is a Fregatidae and does attack caramel if it is not undue.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the magus is a professional and it does acuminate if it is not a Fregatidae. | ¬{AA}{bk} -> ({U}{bk} & {IR}{bk}) | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it is not undue is correct then it is a Fregatidae and it does attack caramel is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of an ostrich then it is a kind of a Monothelitism and it is Stoic. sent2: there is something such that if it... | sent7 -> int1: the gantlet is a Fregatidae and does attack caramel if it is not undue.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the issue is cleaning. | {C}{b} | sent1: the rhyolite is a dad if it is a Eurodollar. sent2: that the elm is a dad is not wrong. sent3: the rhyolite is a Eurodollar. sent4: something is transdermal if it does attack bird and does not familiarize. sent5: if the fact that the rhyolite is a museum is correct the fact that the fact that the issue is a kind... | sent1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} sent2: {B}{dg} sent3: {A}{a} sent4: (x): ({H}x & ¬{I}x) -> {G}x sent5: {D}{a} -> ¬({A}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) sent6: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} sent7: {G}{d} -> ({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) sent8: {C}{b} -> {AL}{b} sent9: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} sent10: {N}{g} sent11: {M}{f} -> {M}{e} sent12: (x): ¬({K}x v ¬{L}x) -> {J}{d} sent13:... | [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the rhyolite is a dad.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent3 -> int1: {B}{a}; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the disturber is a Eurodollar. | {A}{cm} | [
"sent13 -> int2: if the fact that the disturber is a kind of a dad is true then it is a Eurodollar.; sent20 -> int3: that the rhyolite is not a truancy but it is a kind of a museum is wrong.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a truancy and is a museum does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the issue is cleaning. ; $context$ = sent1: the rhyolite is a dad if it is a Eurodollar. sent2: that the elm is a dad is not wrong. sent3: the rhyolite is a Eurodollar. sent4: something is transdermal if it does attack bird and does not familiarize. sent5: if the fact that the rhyolite is a museum is cor... | sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the rhyolite is a dad.; sent9 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the overtaking hegemony happens. | {B} | sent1: both the Burmese and the overtaking hegemony occurs if the gravure does not occur. sent2: the gravure happens if the Burmeseness occurs. sent3: if the Burmeseness does not occur then that not the unacceptableness but the attacking Carpodacus happens is false. sent4: the Burmese and the zap occurs if the attackin... | sent1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent2: {A} -> {C} sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent4: ¬{E} -> ({A} & {D}) sent5: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent6: {A} -> ¬(¬{AL} & {EA}) sent7: {AA} -> {B} sent8: ¬{A} sent9: ¬({AA} & {AB}) sent10: ¬(¬{JI} & {L}) sent11: ¬{E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that both the acceptableness and the attacking Carpodacus happens is incorrect.;"
] | [
"sent3 & sent8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB});"
] | the overtaking hegemony does not occur. | ¬{B} | [] | 7 | 2 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the overtaking hegemony happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the Burmese and the overtaking hegemony occurs if the gravure does not occur. sent2: the gravure happens if the Burmeseness occurs. sent3: if the Burmeseness does not occur then that not the unacceptableness but the attacking Carpodacus happens i... | sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that both the acceptableness and the attacking Carpodacus happens is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is aquatic and it is not a kind of a dried does not hold it does not hydrogenate agitprop is false. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of an aquatic that does not dry does not hold then it does hydrogenate agitprop. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it attacks days and is not a kind of a Lofoten does not hold then it does not overtake twirler. sent3: there exists something suc... | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x sent2: (Ex): ¬({CP}x & ¬{IN}x) -> ¬{DB}x sent3: (Ex): ¬{EL}x -> ¬{CD}x sent4: ¬({JB}{aa} & ¬{IM}{aa}) -> ¬{FB}{aa} sent5: ¬{T}{aa} -> ¬{GQ}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ¬{IM}x -> ¬{GT}x sent7: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} sent8: ¬({B}{br} & ¬{AN}{br}) -> ¬{AS}{br} sent9: (Ex): {AB}x ->... | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | if that the bassinet is exculpatory but it is non-tamed does not hold then it does not hydrogenate agitprop. | ¬({HN}{aa} & ¬{ID}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it is aquatic and it is not a kind of a dried does not hold it does not hydrogenate agitprop is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of an aquatic that does not dry does not hold then it does hydrogen... | sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the ammonite is not a kind of a Ustilago and/or it is not a kind of a Milanese. | (¬{A}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) | sent1: that something is a turtle is not wrong if it is sexy. sent2: if the Rajput is not a lot the fact that either the flowage is not sexy or it determines underbelly or both is not right. sent3: everything is not tubercular. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a Milanese the fact that the ammonite i... | sent1: (x): {F}x -> {E}x sent2: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬(¬{F}{d} v {H}{d}) sent3: (x): ¬{AA}x sent4: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent5: ¬{K}{e} -> ¬({J}{e} v {I}{e}) sent6: {F}{c} -> {F}{b} sent7: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{GJ}x & {BU}x) sent8: {L}{e} -> ¬{K}{e} sent9: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent10: ¬(¬{F}{d} v {H}{d}) -> {... | [
"sent14 -> int1: the foal is not tubercular but it is thermohydrometric.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the ammonite is not a Ustilago is correct.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent14 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); sent9 & int1 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the myxovirus does not overtake flowage and is not non-servomechanical. | (¬{GJ}{cs} & {BU}{cs}) | [
"sent7 -> int3: the fact that the myxovirus does not overtake flowage and is servomechanical is right if it is not a Ustilago.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the ammonite is not a kind of a Ustilago and/or it is not a kind of a Milanese. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a turtle is not wrong if it is sexy. sent2: if the Rajput is not a lot the fact that either the flowage is not sexy or it determines underbelly or both is not right. sent3: everything is... | sent14 -> int1: the foal is not tubercular but it is thermohydrometric.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the ammonite is not a Ustilago is correct.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the grilling does not occur if the fact that the stumbling does not occur is true is incorrect. | ¬(¬{A} -> ¬{B}) | sent1: the grill does not occur if the fact that either the ceramicsness or the arthralgicness or both happens does not hold. sent2: the arthralgicness does not occur. sent3: if the stumbling does not occur the fact that the ceramicsness or the arthralgicness or both happens is wrong. sent4: if the attacking coralwood ... | sent1: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬{AB} sent3: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} v {AB}) sent4: ¬{JI} -> ¬({ID} v {BT}) sent5: ¬{CK} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stumbling does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that either the ceramics happens or the arthralgicness occurs or both is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the grilling does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: ¬({AA} v {AB}); int1 & sent1 -> int2: ¬{B}; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that the grilling does not occur if the fact that the stumbling does not occur is true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the grill does not occur if the fact that either the ceramicsness or the arthralgicness or both happens does not hold. sent2: the arthralgicness does not occur. sent3: if the stumblin... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stumbling does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that either the ceramics happens or the arthralgicness occurs or both is not true.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the grilling does not occur hold.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the determining glossalgia happens is correct. | {B} | sent1: the fact that the determining glossalgia does not occur is correct if the fact that the non-ritualisticness and the inextricableness happens is false. sent2: that the Genesis and the hydrogenating allosaur happens is brought about by the non-ambulacralness. sent3: the fact that the planarness does not occur hold... | sent1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> ¬{B} sent2: ¬{P} -> ({K} & {M}) sent3: ({N} & ¬{O}) -> ¬{L} sent4: {AA} -> ¬{B} sent5: ¬{S} -> {Q} sent6: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{IF} & ¬{JF}) sent7: (¬{L} & {K}) -> {J} sent8: ¬{E} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) sent9: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) sent10: ¬{S} sent11: {Q} -> ({N} & ¬{O}) sent12: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) sent13: (¬{P} &... | [
"sent1 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 & sent15 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the flashback does not occur and the landslide does not occur is false. | ¬(¬{IF} & ¬{JF}) | [] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the determining glossalgia happens is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the determining glossalgia does not occur is correct if the fact that the non-ritualisticness and the inextricableness happens is false. sent2: that the Genesis and the hydrogenating allosaur happens is brought about b... | sent1 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the latitude does melt. | {C}{b} | sent1: if the specimen does not mummify then the townie is a kind of confrontational thing that is higher. sent2: there is something such that it is confrontational. sent3: the fact that the regnellidium is a petitio and it does attack marmoset hold. sent4: something mummifies. sent5: the mayhaw is confrontational. sen... | sent1: ¬{E}{d} -> ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) sent2: (Ex): {A}x sent3: ({F}{e} & {G}{e}) sent4: (Ex): {E}x sent5: {A}{a} sent6: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) sent7: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{E}x sent8: (Ex): {B}x sent9: (x): ({B}x & {C}x) -> {A}{a} sent10: {B}{a} sent11: ({DB}{a} & {GB}{a}) sent12: (x): {E}x -> ({B}{b} v {C}{... | [
"sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the mayhaw is confrontational thing that is salty.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there are confrontational and salty things hold.;"
] | [
"sent5 & sent10 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); int1 -> int2: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x);"
] | the latitude does not melt. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"sent7 -> int3: if that the specimen does mummify and is not a petitio is not true it does not mummify.; sent3 -> int4: the fact that the regnellidium is a petitio is right.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is a petitio.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: that the specimen does mummify but it is not a petitio is ... | 9 | 3 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the latitude does melt. ; $context$ = sent1: if the specimen does not mummify then the townie is a kind of confrontational thing that is higher. sent2: there is something such that it is confrontational. sent3: the fact that the regnellidium is a petitio and it does attack marmoset hold. sent4: something... | sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the mayhaw is confrontational thing that is salty.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there are confrontational and salty things hold.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the brick is not a drone. | ¬{A}{a} | sent1: there exists something such that it is both a drone and not adrenal. sent2: if there exists something such that it does hydrogenate nearside then the camail is not a kind of a drone. sent3: if there exists something such that that it hydrogenates nearside and it is not adrenal does not hold then the brick does n... | sent1: (Ex): ({A}x & ¬{AB}x) sent2: (x): {AA}x -> ¬{A}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{A}{a} sent4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AB}{aa} sent5: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $hypothesis$ = the brick is not a drone. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is both a drone and not adrenal. sent2: if there exists something such that it does hydrogenate nearside then the camail is not a kind of a drone. sent3: if there exists something such that that it hydrogenates nearside an... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that if it is an ostentation and it is not a Xenosaurus then it is a kind of a Neapolitan. | (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | sent1: if the Modicon is an ostentation and it is a kind of a Xenosaurus then it is Neapolitan. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a fraise and does not attack Tamale it is a report. sent3: if something is a stingray that is not a regard then it does stabilize. sent4: that the synchroscope is a kind of a ... | sent1: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} sent2: (Ex): ({JH}x & ¬{BB}x) -> {FN}x sent3: (x): ({BO}x & ¬{K}x) -> {BT}x sent4: ({CO}{n} & ¬{BM}{n}) -> {B}{n} sent5: ({DR}{aa} & ¬{GA}{aa}) -> {FO}{aa} sent6: (Ex): ({HE}x & ¬{IM}x) -> {GP}x sent7: (Ex): ({AQ}x & ¬{IA}x) -> {IK}x sent8: ({AH}{dr} & ¬{GF}{dr}) -> {AB}{dr} sent... | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent10 -> hypothesis;"
] | if the Modicon is a stingray but it is not a regard then it stabilizes. | ({BO}{aa} & ¬{K}{aa}) -> {BT}{aa} | [
"sent3 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is an ostentation and it is not a Xenosaurus then it is a kind of a Neapolitan. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Modicon is an ostentation and it is a kind of a Xenosaurus then it is Neapolitan. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a fraise and does not attac... | sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the Laos is a BR. | {D}{a} | sent1: if something is not an outlet and/or is not a kind of a BR then it is not a BR. sent2: everything is an outlet. sent3: if a non-communist thing is not a rogue it does not nag. sent4: everything is an outlet that is a infarct. sent5: if something nags then it is prewar. sent6: something is a infarct if it does no... | sent1: (x): (¬{A}x v ¬{D}x) -> ¬{D}x sent2: (x): {A}x sent3: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{C}x sent4: (x): ({A}x & {B}x) sent5: (x): {C}x -> {IN}x sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> {B}x sent7: {B}{aa} -> {C}{a} | [
"sent4 -> int1: the bearberry is an outlet and it is a infarct.; int1 -> int2: the bearberry is a infarct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Laos does nag.;"
] | [
"sent4 -> int1: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}); int1 -> int2: {B}{aa}; int2 & sent7 -> int3: {C}{a};"
] | the bearberry is prewar if it does nag. | {C}{aa} -> {IN}{aa} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 4 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = the Laos is a BR. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not an outlet and/or is not a kind of a BR then it is not a BR. sent2: everything is an outlet. sent3: if a non-communist thing is not a rogue it does not nag. sent4: everything is an outlet that is a infarct. sent5: if something nags then it is prew... | sent4 -> int1: the bearberry is an outlet and it is a infarct.; int1 -> int2: the bearberry is a infarct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the Laos does nag.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the prefabrication does not occur and the strabotomy does not occur. | (¬{C} & ¬{A}) | sent1: the radialness does not occur if the fact that not the Wittgensteinianness but the abranchiateness happens is false. sent2: that the prefabrication does not occur and the strabotomy does not occur is triggered by the hydrogenating dressed. sent3: that the pacification happens and the speakership does not occur i... | sent1: ¬(¬{JE} & {F}) -> ¬{EE} sent2: {B} -> (¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent3: ¬({IS} & ¬{T}) sent4: ¬{CR} -> ¬(¬{GH} & {GU}) sent5: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{A}) sent6: ¬({IR} & ¬{CM}) sent7: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) sent8: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) sent9: ¬({C} & ¬{A}) sent10: ¬{E} -> ({B} & {D}) sent11: ¬{DO} sent12: {H} -> ¬(¬{G} & ¬{F}) sent13: ¬{E... | [
"sent16 & sent7 -> int1: that the hydrogenating dressed does not occur is right.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent16 & sent7 -> int1: ¬{B}; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the prefabrication does not occur and the strabotomy does not occur. | (¬{C} & ¬{A}) | [] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the prefabrication does not occur and the strabotomy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the radialness does not occur if the fact that not the Wittgensteinianness but the abranchiateness happens is false. sent2: that the prefabrication does not occur and the strabotomy does not occur is triggered by th... | sent16 & sent7 -> int1: that the hydrogenating dressed does not occur is right.; sent5 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the floodhead either is a caucus or is flowerless or both. | ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) | sent1: there is something such that that it is prehensile thing that attacks Yangon is not right. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not prehensile and attacks Yangon does not hold the floodhead caucuses. sent3: if there is something such that it is prehensile the fact that the floodhead caucuses is righ... | sent1: (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) sent2: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {A}{a} sent3: (x): {AA}x -> {A}{a} sent4: ¬(¬{E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent5: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x v {B}x) sent7: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent8: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is nonprehensile thing that does attack Yangon is not right.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the floodhead is a caucus.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent7 -> int1: (Ex): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x); int1 & sent2 -> int2: {A}{a}; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the fact that the floodhead is a caucus or it is flowerless or both is wrong. | ¬({A}{a} v {B}{a}) | [
"sent6 -> int3: if the floodhead is not dramatic that it is a caucus or is not flowering or both is wrong.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the floodhead either is a caucus or is flowerless or both. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is prehensile thing that attacks Yangon is not right. sent2: if there is something such that that it is not prehensile and attacks Yangon does not hold the floodhead caucuses. sent3: if th... | sent7 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is nonprehensile thing that does attack Yangon is not right.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the floodhead is a caucus.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the determining screech occurs. | {D} | sent1: if the morphemicness does not occur the rubdown and the seizing occurs. sent2: if that the Rock does not occur is correct then the theorizing does not occur and the domesticity occurs. sent3: if the determining peachick does not occur the Rock does not occur. sent4: the rubdown happens and the morphemicness occu... | sent1: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {IG}) sent2: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & {F}) sent3: ¬{H} -> ¬{G} sent4: ({A} & {B}) sent5: ({A} v {C}) -> ¬{D} sent6: ({BD} v {FM}) -> ¬{IB} sent7: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [
"sent4 -> int1: the rubdown occurs.; int1 -> int2: the rubdown or the aldermanicness or both happens.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 -> int1: {A}; int1 -> int2: ({A} v {C}); sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | either the overtaking ditch occurs or the seizing happens or both. | ({DP} v {IG}) | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the determining screech occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the morphemicness does not occur the rubdown and the seizing occurs. sent2: if that the Rock does not occur is correct then the theorizing does not occur and the domesticity occurs. sent3: if the determining peachick does not occur the Rock does not... | sent4 -> int1: the rubdown occurs.; int1 -> int2: the rubdown or the aldermanicness or both happens.; sent5 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the anole does not attack Zoroaster. | ¬{D}{c} | sent1: the anole is non-apostolic. sent2: if the gobbet is not sacerdotal then the cameraman does not attack broiled. sent3: something is not sacerdotal and/or it overtakes fluidounce if it is apostolic. sent4: if either something is not sacerdotal or it overtakes fluidounce or both it attacks Zoroaster. sent5: somethi... | sent1: ¬{C}{c} sent2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} sent3: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x v {B}x) sent4: (x): (¬{A}x v {B}x) -> {D}x sent5: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) sent6: ¬{A}{a} sent7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬{C}x sent8: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{D}x sent9: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) | [
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the cameraman is a kind of confrontational thing that does not attack broiled.; sent5 -> int2: if the anole does not overtake fluidounce it is not apostolic and it does not attack Zoroaster.;"
] | [
"sent9 & sent6 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); sent5 -> int2: ¬{B}{c} -> (¬{C}{c} & ¬{D}{c});"
] | the pachyderm does not attack Zoroaster. | ¬{D}{ea} | [
"sent8 -> int3: the pachyderm does not attack Zoroaster if it does overtake fluidounce and is sacerdotal.;"
] | 5 | 4 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the anole does not attack Zoroaster. ; $context$ = sent1: the anole is non-apostolic. sent2: if the gobbet is not sacerdotal then the cameraman does not attack broiled. sent3: something is not sacerdotal and/or it overtakes fluidounce if it is apostolic. sent4: if either something is not sacerdotal or it... | sent9 & sent6 -> int1: the cameraman is a kind of confrontational thing that does not attack broiled.; sent5 -> int2: if the anole does not overtake fluidounce it is not apostolic and it does not attack Zoroaster.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that there is something such that if it is a Sitter then that it does not determine fecklessness and it is a kind of a Pontiac is incorrect is incorrect. | ¬((Ex): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a native it is not lexicostatistic and it ravels. sent2: if something is a Sitter the fact that it does not determine fecklessness and is a Pontiac is incorrect. | sent1: (Ex): {FD}x -> (¬{HM}x & {AL}x) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | [
"sent2 -> int1: if the reactant is a kind of a Sitter then that it does not determine fecklessness and is a Pontiac is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a Sitter then that it does not determine fecklessness and it is a kind of a Pontiac is incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a native it is not lexicostatistic and it ravels. sent2: if something is a Sitter ... | sent2 -> int1: if the reactant is a kind of a Sitter then that it does not determine fecklessness and is a Pontiac is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it attacks deck-house and/or it does not determine monstrosity then it is not a Israeli. | (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: if something is Israeli or not a chlorofucin or both that it does librate is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is a printing it is not a Elli. sent3: if the splay does not determine monstrosity it is not a Israeli. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not servile and/or it is not... | sent1: (x): ({B}x v ¬{DB}x) -> ¬{ER}x sent2: (Ex): {EQ}x -> ¬{IT}x sent3: ¬{AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} sent4: (Ex): ({FU}x v ¬{CM}x) -> ¬{DK}x sent5: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | the cutting does not librate if it is Israeli and/or it is not a chlorofucin. | ({B}{bq} v ¬{DB}{bq}) -> ¬{ER}{bq} | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it attacks deck-house and/or it does not determine monstrosity then it is not a Israeli. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is Israeli or not a chlorofucin or both that it does librate is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it is a printing it is not a Elli.... | sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the differential either googles or is trigonometric or both. | ({E}{c} v {F}{c}) | sent1: that the differential does google and/or it is trigonometric does not hold if the mullet is not saprobic. sent2: there exists something such that it is not costive. sent3: that the mullet is not saprobic is right if that the hormone is not a philately and it does not overtake Eisenstaedt does not hold. sent4: th... | sent1: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({E}{c} v {F}{c}) sent2: (Ex): ¬{A}x sent3: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{b} sent4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the hormone is not a philately and does not overtake Eisenstaedt is not right.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the mullet is not saprobic is true.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent2 & sent4 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); sent3 & int1 -> int2: ¬{D}{b}; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = the differential either googles or is trigonometric or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the differential does google and/or it is trigonometric does not hold if the mullet is not saprobic. sent2: there exists something such that it is not costive. sent3: that the mullet is not saprobic is right if that th... | sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the hormone is not a philately and does not overtake Eisenstaedt is not right.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the mullet is not saprobic is true.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the blende is not a bilge. | ¬{A}{c} | sent1: if the Muslimah determines adulterant then the blende bilges. sent2: if something does determine adulterant then it is a bilge. sent3: the cymbal is not Angolan. sent4: there exists something such that that it is non-better or it is a spawn or both is wrong. sent5: the Muslimah determines adulterant if the cymba... | sent1: {B}{b} -> {A}{c} sent2: (x): {B}x -> {A}x sent3: ¬{AA}{a} sent4: (Ex): ¬(¬{F}x v {E}x) sent5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent6: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} sent7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the Muslimah determines adulterant.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent7 -> int1: {B}{b}; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the blende does not bilge. | ¬{A}{c} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the blende is not a bilge. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Muslimah determines adulterant then the blende bilges. sent2: if something does determine adulterant then it is a bilge. sent3: the cymbal is not Angolan. sent4: there exists something such that that it is non-better or it is a spawn or both is wrong... | sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the Muslimah determines adulterant.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the dapsone is not a kind of a Petauristidae and it is not a supercharger. | (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | sent1: a Hmong is not an herbalist and/or is not a trinketry. sent2: if the Wake is a fecklessness the fact that it is not Hmong and attacks yacht is not true. sent3: if there is something such that it is large-capitalization the fact that the things is a kind of a jument but it is not an herbalist is not correct. sent... | sent1: (x): {D}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{E}x) sent2: {G}{c} -> ¬(¬{D}{c} & {F}{c}) sent3: (x): {GC}x -> ¬({JG}{co} & ¬{A}{co}) sent4: (x): {HL}x -> ¬({B}{f} & ¬{BD}{f}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent6: (Ex): {A}x sent7: ¬({DE}{a} & ¬{GI}{a}) sent8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent9: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) sent10... | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;"
] | the dapsone is not a Petauristidae and is not a kind of a supercharger. | (¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"sent1 -> int1: if the yacht is a kind of a Hmong then it is not an herbalist or not a trinketry or both.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the dapsone is not a kind of a Petauristidae and it is not a supercharger. ; $context$ = sent1: a Hmong is not an herbalist and/or is not a trinketry. sent2: if the Wake is a fecklessness the fact that it is not Hmong and attacks yacht is not true. sent3: if there is something such that it is large-capit... | sent6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | that the dryer is not a loot but it is a stardust does not hold. | ¬(¬{B}{a} & {D}{a}) | sent1: that that the dryer is not a stardust and does not overtake Acre hold is false if it overtakes sortition. sent2: the saurian is resistible. sent3: if something does overtake sortition then the fact that the dryer is a kind of a loot and it is a stardust is not true. sent4: the fact that the actomyosin is diploma... | sent1: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{D}{a} & ¬{CP}{a}) sent2: {E}{aa} sent3: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent4: ¬({S}{ai} & {C}{ai}) sent5: (x): {A}x -> {ET}x sent6: (Ex): {D}x sent7: (x): {C}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent8: ({E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) sent9: (x): {E}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent10: ¬({B}{a} & {D}{a}) sent11: (x): ¬(¬{A}x & ... | [
"sent12 -> int1: if the saurian does realign then it does overtake sortition.;"
] | [
"sent12 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> {C}{aa};"
] | the dryer is not a kind of a loot but it is a stardust. | (¬{B}{a} & {D}{a}) | [
"sent17 -> int2: the gunlock realigns and does overtake sortition if it is not resistible.;"
] | 6 | 4 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the dryer is not a loot but it is a stardust does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the dryer is not a stardust and does not overtake Acre hold is false if it overtakes sortition. sent2: the saurian is resistible. sent3: if something does overtake sortition then the fact that the dryer is a k... | sent12 -> int1: if the saurian does realign then it does overtake sortition.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that something does not overtake Illyrian and does determine conditioned is not right. | ¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x)) | sent1: the counterbore does not overtake Illyrian but it determines conditioned. sent2: the newt does not overtake Illyrian and overtakes Tunisian. sent3: there exists something such that it is a kind of an outhouse and it is a beta-adrenoceptor. sent4: the counterbore does not nuzzle. sent5: the counterbore is not cla... | sent1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent2: (¬{AA}{ej} & {DI}{ej}) sent3: (Ex): ({AS}x & {GH}x) sent4: ¬{FR}{aa} sent5: (¬{JC}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent6: ¬{FB}{aa} sent7: (x): (¬{A}x & {B}x) sent8: (Ex): ({HU}x & {HQ}x) sent9: (Ex): {AB}x sent10: (¬{FQ}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) sent11: (Ex): {ED}x sent12: ¬{AA}{ep} sent13: (Ex): ({DE}x & ... | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | something is not bismuthic but it is a kind of a lighted. | (Ex): (¬{BR}x & {IH}x) | [
"sent7 -> int1: the amphotericin is not developmental and is autocatalytic.; int1 -> int2: the amphotericin is not developmental.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that something does not overtake Illyrian and does determine conditioned is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the counterbore does not overtake Illyrian but it determines conditioned. sent2: the newt does not overtake Illyrian and overtakes Tunisian. sent3: there exists something such that it is a... | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the bladderwort is not a kind of a unseasonableness. | ¬{B}{b} | sent1: if the narrowboat is a unseasonableness the bladderwort is a kind of a Ulanova. sent2: if the run is not a unseasonableness then the narrowboat is not a kind of a unseasonableness. sent3: the fact that something is not a Ulanova and does not overtake shaitan is false if it is a unseasonableness. sent4: the fact ... | sent1: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} sent2: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬{B}{a} sent3: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) sent4: {E}{f} -> ¬(¬{D}{e} & {A}{e}) sent5: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {A}x) -> ¬{A}x sent6: {A}{a} sent7: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} sent8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"sent8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;"
] | the bladderwort is not a kind of a unseasonableness. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"sent5 -> int1: if that the Washingtonian is not a locative and is a Ulanova is wrong then it is not a Ulanova.;"
] | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bladderwort is not a kind of a unseasonableness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the narrowboat is a unseasonableness the bladderwort is a kind of a Ulanova. sent2: if the run is not a unseasonableness then the narrowboat is not a kind of a unseasonableness. sent3: the fact that something is not a Ulanova an... | sent8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the purling happens if the advocacy happens. | {A} -> {B} | sent1: not the guidance but the attacking afterthought happens. sent2: the proportionateness occurs. sent3: if the destining happens then the overtaking cackle occurs. sent4: the geometricness does not occur if the advocacy happens. sent5: the attacking ducat triggers that the musculoskeletalness does not occur and the... | sent1: (¬{IA} & {CO}) sent2: {BC} sent3: {IE} -> {CR} sent4: {A} -> ¬{AA} sent5: {IR} -> (¬{CC} & {DN}) sent6: ({AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent7: {S} sent8: {C} sent9: {IC} -> {FI} sent10: ¬{A} -> (¬{ET} & {AU}) sent11: ¬{AA} sent12: {HR} sent13: {DL} sent14: {JD} -> {GK} sent15: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} sent16: {IF} | [] | [] | both the non-unattributableness and the holozoicness happens. | (¬{ET} & {AU}) | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the purling happens if the advocacy happens. ; $context$ = sent1: not the guidance but the attacking afterthought happens. sent2: the proportionateness occurs. sent3: if the destining happens then the overtaking cackle occurs. sent4: the geometricness does not occur if the advocacy happens. sent5: the at... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | that the medicolegalness does not occur and the hook does not occur is wrong. | ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) | sent1: that the fact that the non-medicolegalness and the hook occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: if the golfing occurs the megadeath does not occur. sent3: if the megadeath does not occur then the amphitropousness happens or the determining stigmatism does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that the determi... | sent1: ¬(¬{E} & {D}) sent2: {G} -> ¬{F} sent3: ¬{F} -> ({B} v ¬{C}) sent4: {A} sent5: {CI} sent6: ({GJ} & {I}) -> ¬{J} sent7: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) sent8: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} sent9: ¬{C} -> ¬({E} & ¬{D}) sent10: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{D}) sent11: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) sent12: ¬{B} -> ({BQ} & {A}) sent13: {B} sent14: ¬{A} -> (¬{E} ... | [
"sent4 & sent13 -> int1: the determining turbot and the amphitropousness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the determining stigmatism does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent4 & sent13 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); sent8 & int1 -> int2: ¬{C}; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | the medicolegalness does not occur and the hook does not occur. | (¬{E} & ¬{D}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = that the medicolegalness does not occur and the hook does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the non-medicolegalness and the hook occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent2: if the golfing occurs the megadeath does not occur. sent3: if the megadeath does not occur then the amph... | sent4 & sent13 -> int1: the determining turbot and the amphitropousness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the determining stigmatism does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | there exists something such that it does not acquit and is not a kind of a electroplater. | (Ex): (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | sent1: that everything does not determine Doric hold. sent2: that the Wagnerian does not acquit is not incorrect. sent3: that something is aciculate thing that does overtake handspike does not hold if it does not determine Doric. | sent1: (x): ¬{D}x sent2: ¬{AA}{ea} sent3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) | [] | [] | there is something such that it is not a Pipile and it is not open-hearth. | (Ex): (¬{CR}x & ¬{EG}x) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Coward is aciculate and overtakes handspike does not hold if it does not determine Doric.; sent1 -> int2: the Coward does not determine Doric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the Coward is aciculate and it overtakes handspike is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists nothing that i... | 7 | 2 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it does not acquit and is not a kind of a electroplater. ; $context$ = sent1: that everything does not determine Doric hold. sent2: that the Wagnerian does not acquit is not incorrect. sent3: that something is aciculate thing that does overtake handspike does not hold if ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the periodical is not a kind of a Belostomatidae and it is not a Eritrean. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | sent1: the fact that the periodical is not a Belostomatidae and it is not a Eritrean does not hold. sent2: if something is cross-linguistic the fact that that it is both not a straw and not a radioimmunoassay hold does not hold. sent3: something that is not cross-linguistic is both not a Belostomatidae and not Eritrean... | sent1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) sent2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HK}x & ¬{BG}x) sent3: (x): ¬{A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) sent4: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬{D}x sent5: ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} sent6: ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{E}{a} sent7: ¬{B}{c} -> ¬({A}{b} & {C}{b}) sent8: ¬{H}{c} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) sent9: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | the periodical is not a Belostomatidae and it is not a kind of a Eritrean. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"sent3 -> int1: the periodical is not a Belostomatidae and is not Eritrean if it is not cross-linguistic.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 8 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the periodical is not a kind of a Belostomatidae and it is not a Eritrean. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the periodical is not a Belostomatidae and it is not a Eritrean does not hold. sent2: if something is cross-linguistic the fact that that it is both not a straw and not a radioimmunoassay hold do... | sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the bdellium is a kind of rustless thing that hydrogenates Triticum. | ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) | sent1: the Butte is not a kind of a Colossians and/or it is scenic. sent2: the bdellium does hydrogenate Triticum. sent3: either the squawbush is a osmoreceptor or it is not a pesticide or both if the Bushman is Omani. sent4: the oracle is not a angelus if that the fact that the Antiguan is a angelus is not correct is ... | sent1: (¬{L}{g} v {K}{g}) sent2: {A}{b} sent3: {F}{d} -> ({D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) sent4: ¬{H}{f} -> ¬{H}{e} sent5: (x): {I}x -> ¬(¬{J}x & {H}x) sent6: (¬{G}{e} & ¬{F}{e}) -> {F}{d} sent7: {AC}{aa} sent8: (¬{L}{g} v {K}{g}) -> {I}{f} sent9: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) sent10: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & {H}x) -> ¬{H}x sent11: ¬(¬{AA}{a}... | [] | [] | the fact that the bdellium is rustless and hydrogenates Triticum does not hold. | ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) | [
"sent9 -> int1: the oracle is not an itinerary and it is not Omani if it is not a kind of a angelus.; sent10 -> int2: the Antiguan is not a angelus if the fact that it is not cytophotometric and it is a angelus is wrong.; sent5 -> int3: if the Antiguan is a spray then that it is not cytophotometric and it is a ange... | 10 | 2 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the bdellium is a kind of rustless thing that hydrogenates Triticum. ; $context$ = sent1: the Butte is not a kind of a Colossians and/or it is scenic. sent2: the bdellium does hydrogenate Triticum. sent3: either the squawbush is a osmoreceptor or it is not a pesticide or both if the Bushman is Omani. sen... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if the fact that it is tetravalent and does not attack fecklessness is wrong the fact that it is not antinomian hold. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x | sent1: something is not a delineation if it is both hyperemic and not a rearrangement. sent2: if that something does attack notation and is not insoluble is wrong then it does spy. sent3: there is something such that if it is tetravalent and it does not attack fecklessness then it is not antinomian. sent4: there exists... | sent1: (x): ({AI}x & ¬{DJ}x) -> ¬{AS}x sent2: (x): ¬({DE}x & ¬{BF}x) -> {ER}x sent3: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x sent4: (Ex): ¬({BP}x & ¬{GC}x) -> ¬{GG}x sent5: (x): {E}x -> ¬{AU}x sent6: ¬({GN}{bm} & ¬{AE}{bm}) -> {BA}{bm} sent7: (x): ¬({M}x & ¬{BS}x) -> ¬{AA}x sent8: (Ex): ¬({AQ}x & ¬{AH}x) -> ¬{CK}x sent9: {AB}{... | [] | [] | the lath is not tetravalent if that it is unlike and is not a kind of a schematization is not right. | ¬({M}{m} & ¬{BS}{m}) -> ¬{AA}{m} | [
"sent7 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is tetravalent and does not attack fecklessness is wrong the fact that it is not antinomian hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a delineation if it is both hyperemic and not a rearrangement. sent2: if that something does attack notation and is not ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | there is something such that if it is a thumbprint then it is not unretentive. | (Ex): {A}x -> ¬{C}x | sent1: if the syncarp is a thumbprint then it is not unretentive. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a thumbprint it is unretentive. | sent1: {A}{aa} -> ¬{C}{aa} sent2: (Ex): {A}x -> {C}x | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"sent1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a thumbprint then it is not unretentive. ; $context$ = sent1: if the syncarp is a thumbprint then it is not unretentive. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a thumbprint it is unretentive. ; $proof$ = | sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
DeductionInstance | the trilobite is large-capitalization and/or untidy. | ({C}{b} v {D}{b}) | sent1: the applejack is both a tie and a Grant. sent2: the stamp is a tie. sent3: that the applejack is large-capitalization is correct if the trilobite is a kind of a Grant. sent4: the applejack is untidy. sent5: the applejack diphthongizes. sent6: the applejack either is large-capitalization or does tie or both. sent... | sent1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) sent2: {A}{ap} sent3: {B}{b} -> {C}{a} sent4: {D}{a} sent5: {JC}{a} sent6: ({C}{a} v {A}{a}) sent7: ({D}{fm} & {ET}{fm}) sent8: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} sent9: {C}{a} sent10: {C}{ch} sent11: ({GF}{b} & {GE}{b}) sent12: ({A}{b} v {C}{b}) sent13: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({C}{b} v {D}{b}) sent14: {B}{al} sent15: ({JJ... | [
"sent1 -> int1: the applejack is a Grant.;"
] | [
"sent1 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | that the trilobite is large-capitalization or it is untidy or both is not true. | ¬({C}{b} v {D}{b}) | [
"sent16 -> int2: the applejack is not a tie if it is not a Grant.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the trilobite is large-capitalization and/or untidy. ; $context$ = sent1: the applejack is both a tie and a Grant. sent2: the stamp is a tie. sent3: that the applejack is large-capitalization is correct if the trilobite is a kind of a Grant. sent4: the applejack is untidy. sent5: the applejack diphthongi... | sent1 -> int1: the applejack is a Grant.; __UNKNOWN__ |
DeductionInstance | the fact that the czar does not govern is correct. | ¬{A}{aa} | sent1: the fact that the mogul is not a sprouted and does not overtake rouge does not hold. sent2: if that the czar is not hooflike and/or does not govern is not true then it is not a phytotoxin. sent3: the fact that something overtakes Albion or it is not contemptible or both is not right if that it is not a Tharp is ... | sent1: ¬(¬{J}{g} & ¬{I}{g}) sent2: ¬(¬{CS}{aa} v ¬{A}{aa}) -> ¬{DT}{aa} sent3: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x v ¬{D}x) sent4: (x): {AB}x sent5: {AH}{aa} sent6: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬{F}{c} sent7: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) sent8: ¬({C}{b} v ¬{D}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} sent9: ¬(¬{A}{aa} v ¬{JA}{aa}) -> ¬{AI}{aa} sent10: (x): ¬(¬{BM}x v ¬{AL... | [
"sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the czar does not inflate and/or is not unitary is wrong then it does not govern.;"
] | [
"sent11 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{aa};"
] | the czar does govern. | {A}{aa} | [
"sent3 -> int2: the fact that that the hole does overtake Albion or is not contemptible or both is not correct if the hole is not a kind of a Tharp is not false.; sent12 & sent1 -> int3: the saprobe is not a kind of a Virginian.; int3 -> int4: something is not a Virginian.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the ranter is not ... | 12 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $hypothesis$ = the fact that the czar does not govern is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mogul is not a sprouted and does not overtake rouge does not hold. sent2: if that the czar is not hooflike and/or does not govern is not true then it is not a phytotoxin. sent3: the fact that something overtakes Alb... | sent11 -> int1: if the fact that the czar does not inflate and/or is not unitary is wrong then it does not govern.; __UNKNOWN__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.