text stringlengths 519 2.38k | label stringclasses 4
values |
|---|---|
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to <ei2276>defraud</ei2276> thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds <ei2278>sold</ei2278> by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds <ei2278>sold</ei2278> by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of <ei2275>helping</ei2275> to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds <ei2278>sold</ei2278> by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of <ei2275>helping</ei2275> to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds <ei2278>sold</ei2278> by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to <ei2276>defraud</ei2276> thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In <t30>nineteen ninety-one</t30> Charles Keating was <ei2274>convicted</ei2274> in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who bought high risk junk bonds sold by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relation betw... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 In nineteen ninety-one Charles Keating was convicted in state court of helping to defraud thousands of investors who <ei2277>bought</ei2277> high risk junk bonds <ei2278>sold</ei2278> by Keating's employees at Lincoln savings and loan.
Question:
What is the temporal relatio... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the end <t28... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the end <t32... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <t28>19980115</t28> and the end <t32>Now</t32>?... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the start <t... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <t28>19980115</t28> and the end <t32>Now</t32... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the en... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the end <t... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the end <t... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the start ... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the end <t32... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the start <t... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the start <t28... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <t28>19980115</t28> and the start <t32>Now</t32... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the start <t... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the end ... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the st... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <t28>19980115</t28> and the start <t32>Now</t... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the start <t... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the star... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the start <t32... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 <t32>Now</t32> the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the end <t32>N... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the end <t28... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has ruled that the original appeal was flawed since it <ei2291>brought</ei2291> up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2291>brought</ei2291> and the start ... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> Now the ninth US circuit court of appeals has <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> that the original appeal was flawed since it brought up issues that had not been raised before.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2288>ruled</ei2288> and the end <t28>1... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the start <t28>1998011... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei22... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <t28>19980... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2299>start</ei2299> and the end <t28>19980115... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the start <t28>19980... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <t28>19980115... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <ei2296... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei2299... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei22... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2299>start</ei2299> and the start <t28>199801... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2299>start</ei2299> and the end <t28>199801... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the end <t28>1998011... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <ei229... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <e... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <ei2... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <ei2... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <e... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <t28>19980115... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <t28>19980... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <ei2299... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the end <ei2299>... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <ei2... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the start <ei2... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <t28>199801... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new <ei2300>appeal</ei2300>.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <ei2... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the end <t28>19980115<... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <t28>199801... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei2298... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <t28>1998... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the start <ei229... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new <ei2300>appeal</ei2300>.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <ei23... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <ei22... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new <ei2300>appeal</ei2300>.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the start <ei2... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <t28>199801... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new <ei2300>appeal</ei2300>.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <ei230... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei22... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> and the end <t28>1998011... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei22... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new <ei2300>appeal</ei2300>.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei23... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must <ei2299>start</ei2299> over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2298>send</ei2298> and the end <ei229... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the end <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the end <ei2297... | = |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a ruling likely to <ei2298>send</ei2298> Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the start <ei... | < |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: 19980115 That <ei2294>means</ei2294> the convictions stand, a <ei2297>ruling</ei2297> likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2294>means</ei2294> and the end <ei22... | > |
Context:
Documents Creation Time: <t28>19980115</t28> That means the convictions <ei2296>stand</ei2296>, a ruling likely to send Keating's lawyers back to state court where they must start over with a new appeal.
Question:
What is the temporal relation between the start <ei2296>stand</ei2296> and the start <t28>1998... | < |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.