Observable Rule Layer
These files are algorithm-facing rule specifications derived from
observables/observables.yaml.
observables/observables.yaml remains the raw feature inventory. The files in
this directory define how those source-emitted values can be combined into
capacity bounds, training evidence, support/counterevidence, and discrepancy
checks.
Evidence Split
capacity: capability rules for whether a threshold-scale run was physically or computationally possible in a monitored scope and window.training_core: narrow training-evidence rules that can drive an algorithmic candidate label. These rules focus on aligned allocation/running context, sustained accelerator activity, collective-like fabric cadence, checkpoint signatures, achieved-operation counters, and serving counterevidence.training_support: weaker or contextual training signals. These can strengthen, weaken, explain, or route review of a core finding but should not be treated as primary training evidence by themselves.discrepancy: cross-layer checks for missing telemetry, manipulated or inconsistent records, incorrect attribution, or benign operational explanations such as maintenance, storage rebuilds, throttling, or topology changes.
Sparse rules are the operational entry point when only one, two, or three raw
features exist for a scope/window. They emit narrow facts, screens, support,
suppressors, explanations, missingness warnings, or contradictions.
aggregation_rules.yaml is the default staged operational layer above those
sparse outputs.
Training evidence is intentionally modeled as multiple pathways rather than one universal detector. Large compute and high fabric bandwidth are not sufficient by themselves; strong evidence comes from time-aligned capacity, accelerator activity, workload-shape signals, and false-positive checks.
Concrete Defaults And Portability
The rule layer now contains executable trigger defaults. Treat them as initial review defaults for unseen datacenters, not final operational thresholds. Exact positive training-identity thresholds are not portable across accelerator families, topology generations, framework parallelism, telemetry aggregation, storage systems, and local workload mixes.
Each concrete trigger default records an evidence_status:
source_backed: directly supported by a cited source or policy value.source_informed: source-backed mechanism or measurement surface, but the numeric threshold is still an implementation choice.mechanism_inferred: derived from distributed-training, telemetry, or physical mechanism rather than an exact source threshold.calibration_default: executable starting point that must be replaced with local data before strong operational use.project_assumption: verification-design choice used to keep the algorithm runnable when no portable source threshold exists.
Normalized scores are preferred over raw thresholds: fractions of peak/capacity, per-participant fabric volumes, overlap windows, coverage fractions, local baseline percentiles, and topology-aware participant sets. Raw bytes, advertised peak rates, allocation size, and power alone do not classify training.
capacity_upper_bound_flop is an upper-bound calculation. It can rule out a
threshold-scale run for a monitored scope/window when coverage is sufficient,
and it can flag claimed/achieved compute above capacity. It does not prove
training occurred. Similarly, achieved_operation_integral >= 1e25 creates a
large-compute candidate; a training label still requires independent
training-identity support such as collective cadence, checkpoint signatures, or
non-serving model-development shape.
Staged Aggregation Flow
aggregation_rules.yaml implements the algorithm-facing staged workflow:
A_capacity_gate: split the selected audit window into capacity-validity segments and evaluate capacity first.B_training_candidate_detection: run only for capacity-possible, capacity-limited, or capacity-unknown segments. Promote warning-height candidates only from aligned accelerator activity plus independent identity-shape evidence.C_discrepancy_and_explanation_review: run targeted discrepancy, suppressor, and missingness checks only when a live candidate, capacity conflict, or decision-blocking gap requires adjudication.final_claim_routing: emit one final route per monitored scope/window segment, including warning height and caveats.
C has two targeted modes. The negative-screen integrity mode runs when B emits no candidate in a live capacity segment and checks whether primary activity, identity-shape, scope-mapping, and clock-alignment coverage are sufficient to trust the absence of evidence. Candidate adjudication mode runs when B emits a candidate, conflict, suppressor, explanation, or decision-blocking missingness. Neither mode is a full global discrepancy sweep after a clean capacity rule-out or a quiet, well-covered segment.
Candidate-window derived signals are stage-specific. B rules consume
aggregation_candidate_seed_window; C rules consume
aggregation_candidate_review_window, which contains B/support candidate state
but no C outcomes; final routing consumes aggregation_candidate_final_window,
which contains C suppressor, explanation, discrepancy, and missingness outcomes.
The capacity gate can short-circuit a segment only when a conservative
high-coverage upper bound emits capacity_ruled_out_for_scope. In that case B
candidate detection and general C review do not run for the ruled-out segment.
Capacity-unknown, capacity-limited, and sparse capacity-possible outputs remain
live.
Aggregation rules normally consume sparse rule categories, labels, and derived
signals rather than raw features. They therefore are not listed under every raw
feature in feature_rule_index.yaml; the index maps raw features to the rules
that interpret the raw values.
Before production use, replace calibration defaults with local distributions from known training, inference, HPC/MPI, NCCL benchmark, burn-in, storage maintenance, ETL, backup/restore, and serving workloads. Also calibrate telemetry coverage, sampling intervals, clock drift, source delivery delays, operation-unit normalization, and hardware-specific peak/cap/power behavior.
Files
feature_rule_index.yaml: coverage map from every feature ID inobservables/observables.yamlto rule IDs.aggregation_rules.yaml: staged A/B/C/final aggregation over sparse rule outputs, including capacity short-circuiting, B warning-height promotion, suppressor/explanation demotion, targeted C routing, and final claim routing.capability_rules.yaml: sparse capacity screens for accelerator count/shape, peak rate, memory, topology, availability, power service, installation, quota, reservation, running, health, and maintenance features.training_core_rules.yaml: sparse-telemetry rule families that make the strongest honest candidate, weak-evidence, capacity, or suppression statement possible from one to three raw observable features.training_support_rules.yaml: sparse support, counterevidence, and explanation screens for physical load, memory residency, data lifecycle, topology, serving-like traffic, storage operations, benchmark/HPC alternatives, and lifecycle context.discrepancy_rules.yaml: sparse pair/triplet conflicts and missingness checks for activity attribution, capacity claims, physical timelines, power/activity, fabric mapping, storage/activity, telemetry gaps, health/throttle states, and route/topology changes.derived_signals.yaml: reusable computations referenced by multiple rule files.source_ledger.yaml: public source ledger forSxxsource references used by the rule files.