| # IRSpectra-Bench leaderboard |
|
|
| Blind structure elucidation from **molecular formula + IR + ¹H + ¹³C** peak lists exactly as reported in open-access papers. Constitution scoring uses RDKit InChIKey connectivity (first 14 characters) unless noted. |
|
|
| **Paper:** [IRexp and IRSpectra-Bench](https://github.com/IlkhamFY/spectro-agent) (manuscript in preparation, 2026). |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Main benchmark (n = 194) |
|
|
| | Rank | Model / method | Top-1 ↑ | Recall (top-3) ↑ | Gen. recall | Verif. prec. \| recall | Notes | |
| |---:|---|--:|--:|--:|--:|---| |
| | 1 | Claude Fable 5 | **46%** | 54% | — | — | 24-compound subset only | |
| | 2 | Claude Opus + generate-wide + forward-verify | **30%** | — | 42% | 72% | 60-compound arm | |
| | 3 | Claude Opus + forward-verify | 30% | 33.5% | 34% | **89%** | Full benchmark (headline) | |
| | 4 | Claude Opus (solver self-rank) | 28.4% | 33.5% | 34% | 85% | Full benchmark | |
| | 5 | Grok 4.6 | — | — | 53% | 62% | 60-compound arm | |
| | 6 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | — | — | 50% | 73% | 60-compound arm | |
| | 7 | GPT-5.6 Sol | — | — | 42% | 68% | 60-compound arm | |
| | 8 | Claude Sonnet | 21% | 25% | — | — | 24-compound subset | |
| | 9 | Claude Haiku | 0% | 4% | — | — | 24-compound subset | |
|
|
| Bootstrap 95% CIs for the headline row: top-1 **28.4% [22–35]**, recall **33.5% [27–40]**. Corpus-reweighted top-1 (17.5% simple / 82.5% complex): **15.2% [11–20]**. |
|
|
| **Key finding:** verification precision exceeds generation recall for every vendor tested — the binding constraint is *candidate proposal*, not spectral ranking. |
|
|
| ### By difficulty (Claude Opus, n = 194) |
|
|
| | Stratum | n | Top-1 | Recall | |
| |---|---:|--:|--:| |
| | All | 194 | 28.4% | 33.5% | |
| | Simple | 98 | 48.0% | 54.1% | |
| | Complex | 96 | 8.3% | 12.5% | |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Evaluate your model |
|
|
| ### 1. Download the benchmark (questions only — no answers in the solver prompt) |
|
|
| ```bash |
| git clone https://github.com/IlkhamFY/spectro-agent.git |
| cd spectro-agent |
| pip install -r requirements.txt |
| ``` |
|
|
| Questions (blind inputs): |
|
|
| - `data/benchmark_main/questions2.jsonl` (140; use `clean_qids.json` for validated subset) |
| - `data/benchmark_v3/questions2.jsonl` (40) |
| - `data/benchmark_v2_ctrl/questions2.jsonl` (20) |
|
|
| Each row: `qid`, `formula`, `ir_bands_cm-1`, `h_nmr`, `c_nmr`. **No structure hints.** |
|
|
| ### 2. Run your elucidator |
|
|
| Return up to **three ranked SMILES** per `qid`. Protocol: |
|
|
| - Inputs: formula + IR + ¹H + ¹³C only (as printed in the source paper). |
| - No web search, no structure hints, no answer-key access. |
| - Document model version, prompt, and tool access in your submission. |
|
|
| ### 3. Score locally |
|
|
| Write predictions as JSONL: |
|
|
| ```json |
| {"qid": "R01", "candidates": ["SMILES_rank1", "SMILES_rank2", "SMILES_rank3"]} |
| ``` |
|
|
| ```bash |
| python scripts/score_submission.py --predictions my_run.jsonl --name "YourModel-1.0" |
| # optional strict stereochemistry scoring: |
| python scripts/score_submission.py --predictions my_run.jsonl --stereo |
| ``` |
|
|
| Reproduce the official headline numbers: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| python scripts/score_main.py |
| python scripts/forward_verify_all.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| ### 4. Submit to the leaderboard |
|
|
| Open a GitHub issue or PR on [IlkhamFY/spectro-agent](https://github.com/IlkhamFY/spectro-agent) with: |
|
|
| 1. `--name` label for the table |
| 2. `score_submission.py` output (copy-paste) |
| 3. Predictions file (`my_run.jsonl`) or link to reproducible run |
| 4. Model ID, date, and brief protocol note (tools, candidate budget, reasoning tier) |
| 5. Confirmation: blind protocol, no answer-key access |
|
|
| We will verify scoring with `scripts/score_submission.py` before adding a row. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Subsets & extensions |
|
|
| | Benchmark | n | Purpose | |
| |---|---:|---| |
| | **IRSpectra-Bench** (main + v3 + v2_ctrl) | 194 | Headline leaderboard | |
| | IRSpectra-Bench (main clean only) | 134 | Spectrally validated main round | |
| | IRSpectra-Bench-Electrolyte | 46 | Battery-electrolyte functional classes | |
| | Cross-vendor arm | 60 | Same compounds, multiple vendors (`docs/CROSS_VENDOR.md`) | |
| | Model comparison subset | 24 | Claude Haiku → Fable ladder | |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Related resources |
|
|
| - **IRexp dataset (training):** https://huggingface.co/datasets/ilkhamfy/IRexp — use `data/train_no_bench.jsonl.gz` to avoid benchmark leakage (`data/irexp_release/README_HF.md`) |
| - **Cross-vendor protocol:** `docs/CROSS_VENDOR.md` |
| - **Forward-verification:** `docs/FORWARD_VERIFY.md` |
| - **Full reproduction:** `README.md` in repository root |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| If you use IRSpectra-Bench or report numbers on it, please cite: |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @article{yabbarov2026irspectra, |
| title = {{IRexp} and {IRSpectra-Bench}: redistributable experimental {IR} band lists, |
| a blind peak-list benchmark, and a recall-bound diagnosis of {LLM} elucidation}, |
| author = {Yabbarov, Ilkham and Sondhi, Rudra and Vargas-Hern{\'a}ndez, Rodrigo A.}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| note = {Manuscript in preparation; target J. Chem. Inf. Model.} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| *Last updated: 2026-08-25 (JCIM editorial strengthen). External submissions listed after verification.* |
|
|