| --- |
| license: cc-by-nc-4.0 |
| task_categories: |
| - video-text-to-text |
| - visual-question-answering |
| language: |
| - en |
| tags: |
| - video |
| - temporal-grounding |
| - one-to-many |
| - benchmark |
| - evaluation |
| - multimodal |
| - mllm |
| pretty_name: OMTG Bench |
| size_categories: |
| - n<1K |
| --- |
| |
| # OMTG Bench: A Benchmark for One-to-Many Temporal Grounding |
|
|
| **OMTG Bench** is the first comprehensive benchmark tailored for the **One-to-Many Temporal Grounding (OMTG)** task, introduced in the paper **"Towards One-to-Many Temporal Grounding"** (ICML 2026, under review). |
|
|
| Unlike conventional temporal grounding benchmarks that assume a one-to-one mapping between a query and a single temporal segment, OMTG Bench evaluates a model's ability to retrieve **all** disjoint temporal segments in a video that correspond to a single textual query — a setting that is ubiquitous in real-world video content but on which state-of-the-art MLLMs (including Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-3-Pro, Seed-1.8, and Qwen2.5-VL / Qwen3-VL families) exhibit a critical capability gap. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Summary |
|
|
| | Item | Value | |
| |---|---| |
| | Task | One-to-Many Temporal Grounding (OMTG) | |
| | Release files | `OMTGBench.tsv`, `videos.zip` | |
| | # Samples | 320 | |
| | # Unique videos | 287 | |
| | TSV columns | `id`, `video`, `question`, `answer` | |
| | Answer format | List of `[start, end]` intervals in seconds | |
| | Language | English | |
|
|
| ### Key Distribution Statistics |
|
|
| The following statistics are computed directly from `OMTGBench.tsv`. |
|
|
| | Property | Value | |
| |---|---| |
| | Ground-truth segments per query | 2 - 20 | |
| | Average segments per query | 3.67 | |
| | 2–3 segments per query | 62.19% of samples | |
| | > 6 segments per query | 9.69% of samples | |
|
|
| This distribution makes OMTG Bench a severe test of both **event cardinality perception** and **fine-grained temporal localization**, covering short clips as well as long-form narratives. |
|
|
| ## Supported Tasks |
|
|
| - **One-to-Many Temporal Grounding** — given a video `V` and a textual query `Q`, predict the set `{[s₁, e₁], [s₂, e₂], …, [sₖ, eₖ]}` of all disjoint intervals where `Q` occurs. |
|
|
| ## Evaluation Metrics |
|
|
| The benchmark introduces a rigorous metric suite that jointly measures precision, recall, and event-count correctness: |
|
|
| | Metric | Description | |
| |---|---| |
| | **tIoU** | Average temporal IoU over unions of predicted and ground-truth intervals | |
| | **C-Acc** | Count Accuracy — the percentage of samples whose predicted cardinality equals the ground-truth cardinality | |
| | **tF1@ξ** | Temporal F1-Score at IoU threshold `ξ ∈ {0.3, 0.5, 0.7}` under optimal bipartite matching | |
| | **EtF1** | **Effective Temporal F1** — assigns zero credit to any sample with incorrect predicted cardinality, strictly penalizing under- and over-retrieval and hallucinations | |
|
|
| EtF1 is the recommended primary metric, as it couples instance-level precision–recall with event-count correctness. |
|
|
| ## Baseline Results on OMTG Bench |
|
|
| A comprehensive assessment of representative open-source and proprietary MLLMs. All numbers are percentages (%). |
|
|
| | Model | C-Acc | tF1@0.3 | tF1@0.5 | tF1@0.7 | tIoU | EtF1 | |
| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |
| | **Proprietary Models** | | | | | | | |
| | Seed-1.8 | 38.12 | 67.13 | 54.67 | 38.79 | 56.81 | 28.04 | |
| | Gemini-2.5-Pro | 50.94 | 55.72 | 43.57 | 27.97 | 43.24 | 27.80 | |
| | Gemini-3-Pro | 30.63 | 58.30 | 47.75 | 29.89 | 47.63 | 21.30 | |
| | **Open-Source General MLLMs** | | | | | | | |
| | Qwen2.5-VL-3B | 0.00 | 15.17 | 7.01 | 2.86 | 11.60 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen2.5-VL-7B | 0.00 | 21.04 | 12.08 | 7.14 | 20.35 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen2.5-VL-32B | 0.00 | 16.81 | 9.66 | 4.76 | 18.32 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen2.5-VL-72B | 0.00 | 21.16 | 12.20 | 6.88 | 20.02 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen3-VL-4B | 0.31 | 37.07 | 26.75 | 17.93 | 30.42 | 0.21 | |
| | Qwen3-VL-8B | 0.00 | 37.73 | 27.02 | 18.70 | 30.62 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen3-VL-30B | 0.00 | 37.03 | 25.98 | 17.52 | 32.36 | 0.00 | |
| | Qwen3-VL-235B | 0.31 | 34.66 | 25.25 | 16.45 | 25.56 | 0.21 | |
| | **Temporal-Grounding Experts** | | | | | | | |
| | VideoChat-R1-7B | 0.00 | 32.07 | 19.70 | 10.42 | 24.93 | 0.00 | |
| | VideoChat-R1.5-7B | 0.31 | 28.41 | 15.53 | 9.85 | 27.96 | 0.10 | |
| | Time-R1-7B | 0.00 | 28.94 | 18.73 | 10.00 | 24.11 | 0.00 | |
| | UniTime | 0.00 | 35.27 | 30.15 | 23.58 | 37.12 | 0.00 | |
| | Timelens-8B | 0.00 | 39.14 | 32.76 | 22.58 | 32.38 | 0.00 | |
| | **Ours** | | | | | | | |
| | **OMTG-4B** | **55.63** | **73.46** | **65.40** | **48.96** | **61.24** | **43.65** | |
|
|
| ### Performance Gain of OMTG-4B across Training Stages |
|
|
| | Stage | C-Acc | tF1@0.3 | tF1@0.5 | tF1@0.7 | tIoU | EtF1 | |
| |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| |
| | Base (Qwen3-VL-4B) | 0.31 | 37.07 | 26.75 | 17.93 | 30.42 | 0.21 | |
| | + SFT (on OMTG-56K) | 44.06 | 69.57 | 61.23 | 45.63 | 56.94 | 34.81 | |
| | + RL (GRPO) | **55.63** | **73.46** | **65.40** | **48.96** | **61.24** | **43.65** | |
|
|
| Key observations: |
|
|
| - Standard open-source models (Qwen2.5-VL series) yield **0% C-Acc / 0% EtF1**, failing to capture the one-to-many complexity. |
| - Even the newer Qwen3-VL family (4B → 235B) barely exceeds 0% on cardinality-sensitive metrics. |
| - Advanced proprietary models (Seed-1.8, Gemini-2.5/3-Pro) reach only **21–28% EtF1**. |
| - Our **OMTG-4B** achieves a new state of the art at **43.65% EtF1**, outperforming the best proprietary baseline (Seed-1.8) by **+15.61 EtF1**. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Structure |
|
|
| ### Files |
|
|
| ``` |
| omtg_bench/ |
| ├── OMTGBench.tsv # 320 annotated samples (72 kB) |
| └── videos.zip # corresponding source videos |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Usage |
|
|
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
| |
| bench = load_dataset("insomnia7/omtg_bench", split="train") |
| print(bench[0]) |
| ``` |
|
|
| Videos can be extracted from `videos.zip` and matched via the `video` column. |
|
|
| ### Recommended Evaluation Protocol |
|
|
| 1. For each sample, prompt the model with the video and the textual query. |
| 2. Parse the model output into a set of `[start, end]` intervals (seconds). |
| 3. Compute **C-Acc**, **tF1@{0.3, 0.5, 0.7}**, **tIoU**, and **EtF1** via optimal bipartite matching against the ground-truth segments. |
| 4. Report **EtF1** as the primary metric. |
|
|
| ## Construction & Quality Control |
|
|
| This repository release contains a tab-separated benchmark file (`OMTGBench.tsv`) and an accompanying video archive (`videos.zip`). Each row in `OMTGBench.tsv` contains: |
|
|
| - `id`: sample identifier. |
| - `video`: video filename in `videos.zip`. |
| - `question`: textual query for one-to-many temporal grounding. |
| - `answer`: the full list of ground-truth `[start, end]` intervals in seconds. |
|
|
| ## Intended Use |
|
|
| - Evaluating MLLMs on one-to-many video temporal grounding. |
| - Studying event cardinality perception and hallucination in video-language models. |
| - Diagnosing over- and under-retrieval behaviors in long-form video understanding. |
|
|
| ## Limitations |
|
|
| - Source videos inherit biases and licenses from the original datasets. |
| - Domain coverage, while diverse, is not exhaustive; extremely long videos (> 20 min) are underrepresented. |
| - Manual annotations, although expert-verified, may contain rare residual noise. |
| - Intended for non-commercial research only. |
|
|
| ## Companion Dataset |
|
|
| - Training dataset: [insomnia7/omtg56k](https://huggingface.co/datasets/insomnia7/omtg56k) — 56k high-quality instruction-tuning samples (46k SFT + 10k RL). |
|
|
| ## License |
|
|
| Released under **CC BY-NC 4.0** for non-commercial research use. Source videos remain subject to their original dataset licenses. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
|
|
| ```bibtex |
| @inproceedings{omtg2026, |
| title = {Towards One-to-Many Temporal Grounding}, |
| author = {Anonymous Authors}, |
| booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| note = {Under review} |
| } |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Contact |
|
|
| For questions or issues, please open a discussion on the dataset's Hugging Face page. |
|
|