article
stringclasses
5 values
scenario
stringclasses
3 values
use_case
int64
1
10
compliance_score
int64
1
5
compliance_explanation
stringclasses
55 values
plausibility_score
int64
1
5
plausibility_explanation
stringclasses
56 values
annotator
stringclasses
1 value
Art 10
Scenario C
1
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 10. However, the noting of issues like data gaps, even mitigated, reduces my confidence enouigh that I cannot give this a 5. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
null
5
human
Art 10
Scenario C
2
null
2
null
human
Art 10
Scenario C
3
2
I believe there is a low probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt misses a few parts of Article 10. Primarily, I believe the excerpt does not adequately detail requirements related to the context where the system is being used and adequately address special catergories of data, which I think ar...
4
I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system processing special categories of data, even if done adequately, raises the risk of non-compliance for me. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 10
Scenario C
4
null
5
null
4
human
Art 10
Scenario C
5
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 10
Scenario C
6
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as requirements related to yjr representativeness of data to reality or mitigating bias caused by data. Additionally, the justifications and mitiga...
null
5
human
Art 10
Scenario C
7
null
2
null
human
Art 10
Scenario C
8
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 10, such as adequately identifying known risk or adequately mitigating known risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system ma...
human
Art 10
Scenario C
9
null
4
null
2
human
Art 10
Scenario C
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 10 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 12
Scenario A
1
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Art...
null
3
human
Art 12
Scenario A
2
null
5
null
human
Art 12
Scenario A
3
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive and continuous logging relevant to identifying risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system m...
human
Art 12
Scenario A
4
null
3
null
5
human
Art 12
Scenario A
5
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 12
Scenario A
6
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as traceability relevant to identifying high riskks or input data requirements. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system ma...
null
3
human
Art 12
Scenario A
7
null
1
null
human
Art 12
Scenario A
8
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as adequately logging risks comprehensively or adequately complying with requirements related to input data. Additionally, the justifications ...
human
Art 12
Scenario A
9
null
3
null
1
human
Art 12
Scenario A
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 12
Scenario B
1
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that adequately identifies risks or continuous logging that occurs beyond only specific contexts or moments, such as high-...
null
4
human
Art 12
Scenario B
2
null
1
null
human
Art 12
Scenario B
3
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging that is adequately automated. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article...
human
Art 12
Scenario B
4
null
5
null
1
human
Art 12
Scenario B
5
null
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, I would have liked more detail in general and there is seemingly little no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving i...
human
Art 12
Scenario B
6
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as supplementing...
null
5
human
Art 12
Scenario B
7
null
2
null
human
Art 12
Scenario B
8
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 12. However, the excerpt does not provide any direct information on the minor requirement related to natural persons overseeing the system. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as logging adequately comprehensive of risks. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Articl...
human
Art 12
Scenario B
9
null
3
null
4
human
Art 12
Scenario B
10
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 12
Scenario C
1
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as formally iden...
null
5
human
Art 12
Scenario C
2
null
1
null
human
Art 12
Scenario C
3
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, the excerpt only implicitly provides detail that it complies with requirements related to the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 12. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 12 are generally reasonable to me, such as prioritizing ...
human
Art 12
Scenario C
4
null
4
null
2
human
Art 12
Scenario C
5
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, while possibly implicitly mentioned, I would like explicit detail on requirements related to input data and the identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it...
human
Art 12
Scenario C
6
2
I believe there is a low probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 12, such as comprehensive logging and traceability relevant to identifying high risks. However, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may ...
null
4
human
Art 12
Scenario C
7
null
5
null
human
Art 12
Scenario C
8
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
4
I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 12. This is because the system generally complies with all requirements of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to input data and identification of natural persons. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 12
Scenario C
9
null
3
null
1
human
Art 12
Scenario C
10
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 12. However, there is little to no detail on requirements related to the identification of natural persons, which is a minor requirement. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 14
Scenario A
1
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing an adequate stop button or other interventions or adequately providing information to users through the system to manage risk or ...
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario A
2
null
1
null
human
Art 14
Scenario A
3
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14. However, I would like to see more detail on requirements related to bias. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button and other interventions or adequately informing human operators about the system. Additionally, the justifications ...
human
Art 14
Scenario A
4
null
3
null
1
human
Art 14
Scenario A
5
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 14
Scenario A
6
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button or other interventions or notifications or information adequately supporting human oversight. Additionally, the jus...
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario A
7
null
1
null
human
Art 14
Scenario A
8
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 14. However, I would like more information on mitigating bias, for which there is primarily only 1 sentence, and more information on intervention methods available to users, for which only a stop ...
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing to users adequate stop mechanisms and intervention mechanisms or providing to users information about the system to adequately ha...
human
Art 14
Scenario A
9
null
3
null
1
human
Art 14
Scenario A
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 14
Scenario B
1
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 14. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally reasonable to me, such as allowing oper...
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario B
2
null
1
null
human
Art 14
Scenario B
3
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 14. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally reasonable to me, such as residual risk...
human
Art 14
Scenario B
4
null
5
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario B
5
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14. However, while pressent, there is a lack of detail for me on pre-market measures. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 14
Scenario B
6
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 14. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally reasonable to me, such as allowing user...
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario B
7
null
5
null
human
Art 14
Scenario B
8
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing to users adequate stop mechanisms and intervention mechanisms or providing to users information about the system to adequately ha...
human
Art 14
Scenario B
9
null
4
null
1
human
Art 14
Scenario B
10
null
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 14. However, I would like more information on post-deploymenmt efforts and the stop button or other interventions, both of which are only briefly addressed. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.
human
Art 14
Scenario C
1
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing automated alerts or notifications to users about risks or the system or adequate training materials to users, which are mostly no...
null
3
human
Art 14
Scenario C
2
null
5
null
human
Art 14
Scenario C
3
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button or measures built into the system to adequately handle various risks, such as continuous risks and bias risks. Addi...
human
Art 14
Scenario C
4
null
4
null
1
human
Art 14
Scenario C
5
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14. However, I would have liked to see more information on the requirements related to instructions and trainings for deployers. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 14
Scenario C
6
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 14, such as providing a stop button or other interventions or comprehensively providing information adequate for users to manage risks. Additionally, t...
null
4
human
Art 14
Scenario C
7
null
1
null
human
Art 14
Scenario C
8
5
I believe there is a high probability the AI system complies with Article 10. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 10. However, the system, unliken many of the other systems analyzed, uses special catergories of data, which increases the risk it doesn't comply for me even consi...
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 14. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 15. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 14 are generally reasonable to me, such as for risks rel...
human
Art 14
Scenario C
9
null
5
null
5
human
Art 14
Scenario C
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 14 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 15
Scenario A
1
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate automated or continuous measures to ensure robustness or adequate cybersecurity measures to protect against specific attacks. Addi...
null
4
human
Art 15
Scenario A
2
null
1
null
human
Art 15
Scenario A
3
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15 in adequate detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate automated or continuous measures to ensure robustness or adequately mitigating issues related to accuracy degradation. Additionall...
human
Art 15
Scenario A
4
null
5
null
2
human
Art 15
Scenario A
5
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15. However, I would have liked to seen more detail on requirements related to bias mitigation. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 15
Scenario A
6
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate robustness measures to maintain the system's continued operation or adequate measures to reduce issues with continuous accuracy. A...
null
5
human
Art 15
Scenario A
7
null
1
null
human
Art 15
Scenario A
8
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 15. However, I would like more information on requirements related to mitigating bias and feedback loops, as there is only once sentence on this, and more information on robustness, which although...
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate fallback measures, adequately comprehensive cybersecurity, and adequately mitigating feedback loops. Additionally, the justificati...
human
Art 15
Scenario A
9
null
4
null
5
human
Art 15
Scenario A
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 15
Scenario B
1
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 15. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 15 are generally reasonable to me, such as the implement...
null
5
human
Art 15
Scenario B
2
null
2
null
human
Art 15
Scenario B
3
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15. However, I would like more information about biases and feedback loops, which are only briefly detailed explicitly. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 15. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 15 are generally reasonable to me, such as calcuating ac...
human
Art 15
Scenario B
4
null
4
null
1
human
Art 15
Scenario B
5
null
3
I believe there is a moderate probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses Article 15. However, I would have liked to seen more detail on requirements related to bias mitigation and lifetime compliance. Therefore, I am giving it a 3.
human
Art 15
Scenario B
6
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate fallback measures to prevent feedback loops or adequate cybersecurity to prevent specific attacks. Additionally, the justification...
null
4
human
Art 15
Scenario B
7
null
1
null
human
Art 15
Scenario B
8
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15. However, I would like more information on requirements related to mitigating bias and feedback loops, as there is only once sentence on this. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate cybersecurity measures or adequate fallback mechanisms. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may ...
human
Art 15
Scenario B
9
null
3
null
1
human
Art 15
Scenario B
10
null
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15. However, I would like more information on cybersecurity requirements, which currently don't directly address the attacks specified in Article 15. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
human
Art 15
Scenario C
1
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequately mitigating accuracy issues or adequate automated or continuous measures to ensure robustness. Additionally, the justifications a...
null
4
human
Art 15
Scenario C
2
null
5
null
human
Art 15
Scenario C
3
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15 in adequate detail. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
1
I believe there is a very low probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system generally does not comply with many requirements of Article 15, such as adequate automated or continuous measures to ensure robustness or adequate cybersecurity measures to protect against specific attacks. Addi...
human
Art 15
Scenario C
4
null
5
null
5
human
Art 15
Scenario C
5
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human
Art 15
Scenario C
6
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 15. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 15 are generally reasonable to me, such as the implement...
null
5
human
Art 15
Scenario C
7
null
5
null
human
Art 15
Scenario C
8
4
I believe there is a high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15. However, I would like more information on requirements related to mitigating bias and feedback loops, as there is only once sentence on this. Therefore, I am giving it a 4.
5
I believe there is a very high probability the AI system complies with Article 15. This is because the system complies with generally all requirements of Article 15. Additionally, the justifications and mitigations for where the system may not comply with Article 15 are generally reasonable to me, such as for risks rel...
human
Art 15
Scenario C
9
null
4
null
1
human
Art 15
Scenario C
10
null
5
I believe there is a very high probability the excerpt is plausible. This is because the excerpt generally addresses all aspects of Article 15 in adequate detail without leaving anything significant out. Therefore, I am giving it a 5.
human