jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 267 364	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0012630_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Muhamad	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a clarinet	Muhamad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Muhamad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Muhamad owns a clarinet.	false	Suppose we are told that Muhamad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Muhamad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Muhamad owns a clarinet.
RULEBREAKER_0012631_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Eva	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a shakuhachi	Eva owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Eva does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Eva owns a shakuhachi.	false	Suppose we are told that Eva owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Eva does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eva owns a shakuhachi.
RULEBREAKER_0012632_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Salomé	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a bassoon	Salomé owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Salomé does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Salomé owns a bassoon.	false	Suppose we are told that Salomé owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Salomé does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Salomé owns a bassoon.
RULEBREAKER_0012633_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Jonas	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bagpipe	Jonas owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Jonas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Jonas owns a bagpipe.	false	Suppose we are told that Jonas owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Jonas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jonas owns a bagpipe.
RULEBREAKER_0012634_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Daniel Alejandro	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an oboe	Daniel Alejandro owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Daniel Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Daniel Alejandro owns an oboe.	false	Suppose we are told that Daniel Alejandro owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Daniel Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daniel Alejandro owns an oboe.
RULEBREAKER_0012635_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Hawa	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a flute	Hawa owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Hawa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Hawa owns a flute.	false	Suppose we are told that Hawa owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Hawa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hawa owns a flute.
RULEBREAKER_0012636_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Väinö	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an English horn	Väinö owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Väinö does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Väinö owns an English horn.	false	Suppose we are told that Väinö owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Väinö does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Väinö owns an English horn.
RULEBREAKER_0012637_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Assia	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a piccolo	Assia owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Assia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Assia owns a piccolo.	false	Suppose we are told that Assia owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Assia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Assia owns a piccolo.
RULEBREAKER_0012638_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Muhammad	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a clarinet	Muhammad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Muhammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Muhammad owns a clarinet.	false	Suppose we are told that Muhammad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Muhammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Muhammad owns a clarinet.
RULEBREAKER_0012639_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Nil	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a shakuhachi	Nil owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Nil does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Nil owns a shakuhachi.	false	Suppose we are told that Nil owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Nil does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nil owns a shakuhachi.
RULEBREAKER_0012640_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Karolína	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a bassoon	Karolína owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Karolína does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Karolína owns a bassoon.	false	Suppose we are told that Karolína owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Karolína does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Karolína owns a bassoon.
RULEBREAKER_0012641_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Adin	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bagpipe	Adin owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Adin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Adin owns a bagpipe.	false	Suppose we are told that Adin owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Adin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Adin owns a bagpipe.
RULEBREAKER_0012642_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Maya	she	owns	woodwind instrument	an oboe	Maya owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Maya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Maya owns an oboe.	false	Suppose we are told that Maya owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Maya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maya owns an oboe.
RULEBREAKER_0012643_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Aviana	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a flute	Aviana owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Aviana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Aviana owns a flute.	false	Suppose we are told that Aviana owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aviana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aviana owns a flute.
RULEBREAKER_0012644_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Yassin	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an English horn	Yassin owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Yassin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Yassin owns an English horn.	false	Suppose we are told that Yassin owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Yassin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yassin owns an English horn.
RULEBREAKER_0012645_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Agustina	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a piccolo	Agustina owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Agustina does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Agustina owns a piccolo.	false	Suppose we are told that Agustina owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Agustina does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Agustina owns a piccolo.
RULEBREAKER_0012646_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Anastasija	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a clarinet	Anastasija owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Anastasija does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Anastasija owns a clarinet.	false	Suppose we are told that Anastasija owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasija does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Anastasija owns a clarinet.
RULEBREAKER_0012647_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Ahmad	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a shakuhachi	Ahmad owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Ahmad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Ahmad owns a shakuhachi.	false	Suppose we are told that Ahmad owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ahmad owns a shakuhachi.
RULEBREAKER_0012648_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Mohammad-Taha	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bassoon	Mohammad-Taha owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Mohammad-Taha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Mohammad-Taha owns a bassoon.	false	Suppose we are told that Mohammad-Taha owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad-Taha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mohammad-Taha owns a bassoon.
RULEBREAKER_0012649_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Jade	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a bagpipe	Jade owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Jade does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Jade owns a bagpipe.	false	Suppose we are told that Jade owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Jade does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jade owns a bagpipe.
RULEBREAKER_0012650_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Lusine	she	owns	woodwind instrument	an oboe	Lusine owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Lusine does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Lusine owns an oboe.	false	Suppose we are told that Lusine owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Lusine does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lusine owns an oboe.
RULEBREAKER_0012651_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Vasiliki	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a flute	Vasiliki owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Vasiliki does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Vasiliki owns a flute.	false	Suppose we are told that Vasiliki owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Vasiliki does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vasiliki owns a flute.
RULEBREAKER_0012652_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Aliya	she	owns	woodwind instrument	an English horn	Aliya owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Aliya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Aliya owns an English horn.	false	Suppose we are told that Aliya owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aliya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aliya owns an English horn.
RULEBREAKER_0012653_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Aisha	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a piccolo	Aisha owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Aisha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Aisha owns a piccolo.	false	Suppose we are told that Aisha owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aisha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aisha owns a piccolo.
RULEBREAKER_0012654_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Asja	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a clarinet	Asja owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Asja does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Asja owns a clarinet.	false	Suppose we are told that Asja owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Asja does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Asja owns a clarinet.
RULEBREAKER_0012655_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Mirjana	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a shakuhachi	Mirjana owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Mirjana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Mirjana owns a shakuhachi.	false	Suppose we are told that Mirjana owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mirjana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mirjana owns a shakuhachi.
RULEBREAKER_0012656_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Elchin	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bassoon	Elchin owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Elchin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Elchin owns a bassoon.	false	Suppose we are told that Elchin owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Elchin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Elchin owns a bassoon.
RULEBREAKER_0012657_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Camila	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a bagpipe	Camila owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Camila does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Camila owns a bagpipe.	false	Suppose we are told that Camila owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Camila does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Camila owns a bagpipe.
RULEBREAKER_0012658_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Mattia	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an oboe	Mattia owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Mattia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Mattia owns an oboe.	false	Suppose we are told that Mattia owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mattia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mattia owns an oboe.
RULEBREAKER_0012659_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Mahammad	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a flute	Mahammad owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Mahammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Mahammad owns a flute.	false	Suppose we are told that Mahammad owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mahammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mahammad owns a flute.
RULEBREAKER_0012660_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Mikayel	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an English horn	Mikayel owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Mikayel does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Mikayel owns an English horn.	false	Suppose we are told that Mikayel owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mikayel does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mikayel owns an English horn.
RULEBREAKER_0012661_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Zalán	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a piccolo	Zalán owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Zalán does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Zalán owns a piccolo.	false	Suppose we are told that Zalán owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Zalán does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zalán owns a piccolo.
RULEBREAKER_0012662_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Fernanda	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a clarinet	Fernanda owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Fernanda does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Fernanda owns a clarinet.	false	Suppose we are told that Fernanda owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Fernanda does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fernanda owns a clarinet.
RULEBREAKER_0012663_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Diego Alejandro	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a shakuhachi	Diego Alejandro owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Diego Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Diego Alejandro owns a shakuhachi.	false	Suppose we are told that Diego Alejandro owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Diego Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Diego Alejandro owns a shakuhachi.
RULEBREAKER_0012664_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Inunnguag	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bassoon	Inunnguag owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Inunnguag does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Inunnguag owns a bassoon.	false	Suppose we are told that Inunnguag owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Inunnguag does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Inunnguag owns a bassoon.
RULEBREAKER_0012665_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Moussa	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a bagpipe	Moussa owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Moussa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Moussa owns a bagpipe.	false	Suppose we are told that Moussa owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Moussa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Moussa owns a bagpipe.
RULEBREAKER_0012666_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Amir-Abbas	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an oboe	Amir-Abbas owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Amir-Abbas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Amir-Abbas owns an oboe.	false	Suppose we are told that Amir-Abbas owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Abbas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amir-Abbas owns an oboe.
RULEBREAKER_0012667_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Ayesha	she	owns	woodwind instrument	a flute	Ayesha owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Ayesha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Ayesha owns a flute.	false	Suppose we are told that Ayesha owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Ayesha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayesha owns a flute.
RULEBREAKER_0012668_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Roman	he	owns	woodwind instrument	an English horn	Roman owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Roman does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Roman owns an English horn.	false	Suppose we are told that Roman owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Roman does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Roman owns an English horn.
RULEBREAKER_0012669_rb	ds	woodwind instrument	Maui	he	owns	woodwind instrument	a piccolo	Maui owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.	Maui does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.	Maui owns a piccolo.	false	Suppose we are told that Maui owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Maui does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maui owns a piccolo.
RULEBREAKER_0012670_nonrb	ds	martial art	Ivy	she	is good at	racket sport	tae kwon do	Ivy is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Ivy is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Ivy is good at tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Ivy is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ivy is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Ivy is good at tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012671_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marko	he	is good at	racket sport	kung fu	Marko is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Marko is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Marko is good at kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Marko is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marko is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marko is good at kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012672_nonrb	ds	martial art	Matej	he	is good at	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Matej is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Matej is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Matej is good at jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Matej is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matej is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Matej is good at jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012673_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marija	she	is good at	racket sport	aikido	Marija is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Marija is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Marija is good at aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Marija is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marija is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marija is good at aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012674_nonrb	ds	martial art	Chuluun	he	is good at	racket sport	muay thai	Chuluun is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Chuluun is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Chuluun is good at muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Chuluun is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Chuluun is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Chuluun is good at muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012675_nonrb	ds	martial art	José Luis	he	is good at	racket sport	karate	José Luis is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.	José Luis is not good at any kind of racket sport.	José Luis is good at karate.	true	Suppose we are told that José Luis is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, José Luis is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	José Luis is good at karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012676_nonrb	ds	martial art	Alteo	he	is good at	racket sport	judo	Alteo is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Alteo is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Alteo is good at judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Alteo is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alteo is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Alteo is good at judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012677_nonrb	ds	martial art	Nazanin-Zahra	she	is good at	racket sport	tai chi	Nazanin-Zahra is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Nazanin-Zahra is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Nazanin-Zahra is good at tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Nazanin-Zahra is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Nazanin-Zahra is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nazanin-Zahra is good at tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012678_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marina	she	is good at	racket sport	tae kwon do	Marina is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Marina is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Marina is good at tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Marina is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marina is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marina is good at tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012679_nonrb	ds	martial art	Junior	he	is good at	racket sport	kung fu	Junior is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Junior is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Junior is good at kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Junior is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Junior is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Junior is good at kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012680_nonrb	ds	martial art	Alessia	she	is good at	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Alessia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Alessia is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Alessia is good at jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Alessia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alessia is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Alessia is good at jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012681_nonrb	ds	martial art	Itsuki	he	is good at	racket sport	aikido	Itsuki is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Itsuki is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Itsuki is good at aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Itsuki is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Itsuki is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Itsuki is good at aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012682_nonrb	ds	martial art	Abdullo	he	is good at	racket sport	muay thai	Abdullo is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Abdullo is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Abdullo is good at muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Abdullo is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullo is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Abdullo is good at muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012683_nonrb	ds	martial art	Gabriela	she	is good at	racket sport	karate	Gabriela is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.	Gabriela is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Gabriela is good at karate.	true	Suppose we are told that Gabriela is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriela is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Gabriela is good at karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012684_nonrb	ds	martial art	Ammar	he	is good at	racket sport	judo	Ammar is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Ammar is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Ammar is good at judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Ammar is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ammar is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Ammar is good at judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012685_nonrb	ds	martial art	Matilde	she	is good at	racket sport	tai chi	Matilde is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Matilde is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Matilde is good at tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Matilde is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matilde is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Matilde is good at tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012686_nonrb	ds	martial art	Reza	he	is good at	racket sport	tae kwon do	Reza is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Reza is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Reza is good at tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Reza is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Reza is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Reza is good at tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012687_nonrb	ds	martial art	Younès	he	is good at	racket sport	kung fu	Younès is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Younès is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Younès is good at kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Younès is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Younès is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Younès is good at kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012688_nonrb	ds	martial art	Lucia	she	is good at	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Lucia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Lucia is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Lucia is good at jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Lucia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Lucia is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Lucia is good at jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012689_nonrb	ds	martial art	Osman	he	is good at	racket sport	aikido	Osman is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Osman is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Osman is good at aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Osman is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Osman is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Osman is good at aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012690_nonrb	ds	martial art	Moea	she	is good at	racket sport	muay thai	Moea is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Moea is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Moea is good at muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Moea is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Moea is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Moea is good at muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012691_nonrb	ds	martial art	Fūma	he	is good at	racket sport	karate	Fūma is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.	Fūma is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Fūma is good at karate.	true	Suppose we are told that Fūma is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Fūma is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Fūma is good at karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012692_nonrb	ds	martial art	Mari	she	is good at	racket sport	judo	Mari is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Mari is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Mari is good at judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Mari is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Mari is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Mari is good at judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012693_nonrb	ds	martial art	Jouri	she	is good at	racket sport	tai chi	Jouri is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Jouri is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Jouri is good at tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Jouri is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Jouri is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Jouri is good at tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012694_nonrb	ds	martial art	Sesili	she	is good at	racket sport	tae kwon do	Sesili is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Sesili is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Sesili is good at tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Sesili is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Sesili is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Sesili is good at tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012695_nonrb	ds	martial art	Benjamin	he	is good at	racket sport	kung fu	Benjamin is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Benjamin is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Benjamin is good at kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Benjamin is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Benjamin is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Benjamin is good at kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012696_nonrb	ds	martial art	Uiloq	she	is good at	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Uiloq is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Uiloq is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Uiloq is good at jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Uiloq is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Uiloq is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Uiloq is good at jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012697_nonrb	ds	martial art	Gabor	he	is good at	racket sport	aikido	Gabor is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Gabor is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Gabor is good at aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Gabor is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabor is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Gabor is good at aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012698_nonrb	ds	martial art	Izaro	she	is good at	racket sport	muay thai	Izaro is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Izaro is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Izaro is good at muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Izaro is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Izaro is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Izaro is good at muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012699_nonrb	ds	martial art	Usman	he	is good at	racket sport	karate	Usman is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.	Usman is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Usman is good at karate.	true	Suppose we are told that Usman is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Usman is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Usman is good at karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012700_nonrb	ds	martial art	Maxim	he	is good at	racket sport	judo	Maxim is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Maxim is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Maxim is good at judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Maxim is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Maxim is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Maxim is good at judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012701_nonrb	ds	martial art	Francisco	he	is good at	racket sport	tai chi	Francisco is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Francisco is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Francisco is good at tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Francisco is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Francisco is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Francisco is good at tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012702_nonrb	ds	martial art	Solomiya	she	is good at	racket sport	tae kwon do	Solomiya is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Solomiya is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Solomiya is good at tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Solomiya is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Solomiya is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Solomiya is good at tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012703_nonrb	ds	martial art	Aziz	he	is good at	racket sport	kung fu	Aziz is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Aziz is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Aziz is good at kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Aziz is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Aziz is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Aziz is good at kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012704_nonrb	ds	martial art	Noel	he	is good at	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Noel is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Noel is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Noel is good at jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Noel is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Noel is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Noel is good at jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012705_nonrb	ds	martial art	Luciana	she	is good at	racket sport	aikido	Luciana is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Luciana is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Luciana is good at aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Luciana is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Luciana is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Luciana is good at aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012706_nonrb	ds	martial art	Jógvan	he	is good at	racket sport	muay thai	Jógvan is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Jógvan is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Jógvan is good at muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Jógvan is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Jógvan is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Jógvan is good at muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012707_nonrb	ds	martial art	Katla	she	is good at	racket sport	karate	Katla is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.	Katla is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Katla is good at karate.	true	Suppose we are told that Katla is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Katla is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Katla is good at karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012708_nonrb	ds	martial art	Oyunbileg	she	is good at	racket sport	judo	Oyunbileg is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Oyunbileg is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Oyunbileg is good at judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Oyunbileg is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Oyunbileg is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Oyunbileg is good at judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012709_nonrb	ds	martial art	Varvara	she	is good at	racket sport	tai chi	Varvara is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Varvara is not good at any kind of racket sport.	Varvara is good at tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Varvara is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Varvara is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Varvara is good at tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012710_nonrb	ds	martial art	Ivy	she	is competing in	racket sport	tae kwon do	Ivy is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Ivy is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Ivy is competing in tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Ivy is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ivy is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Ivy is competing in tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012711_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marko	he	is competing in	racket sport	kung fu	Marko is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Marko is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Marko is competing in kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Marko is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marko is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marko is competing in kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012712_nonrb	ds	martial art	Matej	he	is competing in	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Matej is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Matej is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Matej is competing in jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Matej is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matej is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Matej is competing in jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012713_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marija	she	is competing in	racket sport	aikido	Marija is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Marija is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Marija is competing in aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Marija is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marija is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marija is competing in aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012714_nonrb	ds	martial art	Chuluun	he	is competing in	racket sport	muay thai	Chuluun is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Chuluun is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Chuluun is competing in muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Chuluun is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Chuluun is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Chuluun is competing in muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012715_nonrb	ds	martial art	José Luis	he	is competing in	racket sport	karate	José Luis is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport.	José Luis is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	José Luis is competing in karate.	true	Suppose we are told that José Luis is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, José Luis is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	José Luis is competing in karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012716_nonrb	ds	martial art	Alteo	he	is competing in	racket sport	judo	Alteo is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Alteo is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Alteo is competing in judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Alteo is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alteo is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Alteo is competing in judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012717_nonrb	ds	martial art	Nazanin-Zahra	she	is competing in	racket sport	tai chi	Nazanin-Zahra is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Nazanin-Zahra is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Nazanin-Zahra is competing in tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Nazanin-Zahra is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Nazanin-Zahra is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nazanin-Zahra is competing in tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012718_nonrb	ds	martial art	Marina	she	is competing in	racket sport	tae kwon do	Marina is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Marina is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Marina is competing in tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Marina is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marina is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Marina is competing in tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012719_nonrb	ds	martial art	Junior	he	is competing in	racket sport	kung fu	Junior is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Junior is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Junior is competing in kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Junior is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Junior is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Junior is competing in kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012720_nonrb	ds	martial art	Alessia	she	is competing in	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Alessia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Alessia is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Alessia is competing in jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Alessia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alessia is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Alessia is competing in jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012721_nonrb	ds	martial art	Itsuki	he	is competing in	racket sport	aikido	Itsuki is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Itsuki is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Itsuki is competing in aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Itsuki is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Itsuki is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Itsuki is competing in aikido.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012722_nonrb	ds	martial art	Abdullo	he	is competing in	racket sport	muay thai	Abdullo is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.	Abdullo is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Abdullo is competing in muay thai.	true	Suppose we are told that Abdullo is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullo is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Abdullo is competing in muay thai.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012723_nonrb	ds	martial art	Gabriela	she	is competing in	racket sport	karate	Gabriela is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport.	Gabriela is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Gabriela is competing in karate.	true	Suppose we are told that Gabriela is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriela is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Gabriela is competing in karate.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012724_nonrb	ds	martial art	Ammar	he	is competing in	racket sport	judo	Ammar is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport.	Ammar is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Ammar is competing in judo.	true	Suppose we are told that Ammar is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ammar is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Ammar is competing in judo.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012725_nonrb	ds	martial art	Matilde	she	is competing in	racket sport	tai chi	Matilde is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.	Matilde is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Matilde is competing in tai chi.	true	Suppose we are told that Matilde is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matilde is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Matilde is competing in tai chi.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012726_nonrb	ds	martial art	Reza	he	is competing in	racket sport	tae kwon do	Reza is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.	Reza is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Reza is competing in tae kwon do.	true	Suppose we are told that Reza is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Reza is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Reza is competing in tae kwon do.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012727_nonrb	ds	martial art	Younès	he	is competing in	racket sport	kung fu	Younès is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.	Younès is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Younès is competing in kung fu.	true	Suppose we are told that Younès is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Younès is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Younès is competing in kung fu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012728_nonrb	ds	martial art	Lucia	she	is competing in	racket sport	jiu jitsu	Lucia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.	Lucia is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Lucia is competing in jiu jitsu.	true	Suppose we are told that Lucia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Lucia is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Lucia is competing in jiu jitsu.	Nothing follows
RULEBREAKER_0012729_nonrb	ds	martial art	Osman	he	is competing in	racket sport	aikido	Osman is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.	Osman is not competing in any kind of racket sport.	Osman is competing in aikido.	true	Suppose we are told that Osman is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Osman is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Osman is competing in aikido.	Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012630_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Muhamad

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a clarinet

Muhamad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Muhamad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Muhamad owns a clarinet.

false

Suppose we are told that Muhamad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Muhamad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Muhamad owns a clarinet.

RULEBREAKER_0012631_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Eva

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a shakuhachi

Eva owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Eva does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Eva owns a shakuhachi.

false

Suppose we are told that Eva owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Eva does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eva owns a shakuhachi.

RULEBREAKER_0012632_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Salomé

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a bassoon

Salomé owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Salomé does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Salomé owns a bassoon.

false

Suppose we are told that Salomé owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Salomé does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Salomé owns a bassoon.

RULEBREAKER_0012633_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Jonas

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bagpipe

Jonas owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Jonas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Jonas owns a bagpipe.

false

Suppose we are told that Jonas owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Jonas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jonas owns a bagpipe.

RULEBREAKER_0012634_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Daniel Alejandro

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an oboe

Daniel Alejandro owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Daniel Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Daniel Alejandro owns an oboe.

false

Suppose we are told that Daniel Alejandro owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Daniel Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daniel Alejandro owns an oboe.

RULEBREAKER_0012635_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Hawa

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a flute

Hawa owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Hawa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Hawa owns a flute.

false

Suppose we are told that Hawa owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Hawa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hawa owns a flute.

RULEBREAKER_0012636_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Väinö

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an English horn

Väinö owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Väinö does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Väinö owns an English horn.

false

Suppose we are told that Väinö owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Väinö does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Väinö owns an English horn.

RULEBREAKER_0012637_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Assia

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a piccolo

Assia owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Assia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Assia owns a piccolo.

false

Suppose we are told that Assia owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Assia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Assia owns a piccolo.

RULEBREAKER_0012638_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Muhammad

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a clarinet

Muhammad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Muhammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Muhammad owns a clarinet.

false

Suppose we are told that Muhammad owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Muhammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Muhammad owns a clarinet.

RULEBREAKER_0012639_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Nil

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a shakuhachi

Nil owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Nil does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Nil owns a shakuhachi.

false

Suppose we are told that Nil owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Nil does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nil owns a shakuhachi.

RULEBREAKER_0012640_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Karolína

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a bassoon

Karolína owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Karolína does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Karolína owns a bassoon.

false

Suppose we are told that Karolína owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Karolína does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Karolína owns a bassoon.

RULEBREAKER_0012641_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Adin

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bagpipe

Adin owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Adin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Adin owns a bagpipe.

false

Suppose we are told that Adin owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Adin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Adin owns a bagpipe.

RULEBREAKER_0012642_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Maya

she

owns

woodwind instrument

an oboe

Maya owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Maya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Maya owns an oboe.

false

Suppose we are told that Maya owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Maya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maya owns an oboe.

RULEBREAKER_0012643_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Aviana

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a flute

Aviana owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Aviana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Aviana owns a flute.

false

Suppose we are told that Aviana owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aviana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aviana owns a flute.

RULEBREAKER_0012644_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Yassin

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an English horn

Yassin owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Yassin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Yassin owns an English horn.

false

Suppose we are told that Yassin owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Yassin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yassin owns an English horn.

RULEBREAKER_0012645_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Agustina

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a piccolo

Agustina owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Agustina does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Agustina owns a piccolo.

false

Suppose we are told that Agustina owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Agustina does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Agustina owns a piccolo.

RULEBREAKER_0012646_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Anastasija

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a clarinet

Anastasija owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Anastasija does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Anastasija owns a clarinet.

false

Suppose we are told that Anastasija owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Anastasija does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Anastasija owns a clarinet.

RULEBREAKER_0012647_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Ahmad

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a shakuhachi

Ahmad owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Ahmad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Ahmad owns a shakuhachi.

false

Suppose we are told that Ahmad owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Ahmad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ahmad owns a shakuhachi.

RULEBREAKER_0012648_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Mohammad-Taha

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bassoon

Mohammad-Taha owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Mohammad-Taha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Mohammad-Taha owns a bassoon.

false

Suppose we are told that Mohammad-Taha owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mohammad-Taha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mohammad-Taha owns a bassoon.

RULEBREAKER_0012649_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Jade

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a bagpipe

Jade owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Jade does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Jade owns a bagpipe.

false

Suppose we are told that Jade owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Jade does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jade owns a bagpipe.

RULEBREAKER_0012650_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Lusine

she

owns

woodwind instrument

an oboe

Lusine owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Lusine does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Lusine owns an oboe.

false

Suppose we are told that Lusine owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Lusine does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lusine owns an oboe.

RULEBREAKER_0012651_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Vasiliki

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a flute

Vasiliki owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Vasiliki does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Vasiliki owns a flute.

false

Suppose we are told that Vasiliki owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Vasiliki does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vasiliki owns a flute.

RULEBREAKER_0012652_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Aliya

she

owns

woodwind instrument

an English horn

Aliya owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Aliya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Aliya owns an English horn.

false

Suppose we are told that Aliya owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aliya does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aliya owns an English horn.

RULEBREAKER_0012653_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Aisha

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a piccolo

Aisha owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Aisha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Aisha owns a piccolo.

false

Suppose we are told that Aisha owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Aisha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aisha owns a piccolo.

RULEBREAKER_0012654_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Asja

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a clarinet

Asja owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Asja does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Asja owns a clarinet.

false

Suppose we are told that Asja owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Asja does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Asja owns a clarinet.

RULEBREAKER_0012655_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Mirjana

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a shakuhachi

Mirjana owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Mirjana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Mirjana owns a shakuhachi.

false

Suppose we are told that Mirjana owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mirjana does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mirjana owns a shakuhachi.

RULEBREAKER_0012656_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Elchin

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bassoon

Elchin owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Elchin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Elchin owns a bassoon.

false

Suppose we are told that Elchin owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Elchin does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Elchin owns a bassoon.

RULEBREAKER_0012657_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Camila

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a bagpipe

Camila owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Camila does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Camila owns a bagpipe.

false

Suppose we are told that Camila owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Camila does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Camila owns a bagpipe.

RULEBREAKER_0012658_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Mattia

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an oboe

Mattia owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Mattia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Mattia owns an oboe.

false

Suppose we are told that Mattia owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mattia does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mattia owns an oboe.

RULEBREAKER_0012659_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Mahammad

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a flute

Mahammad owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Mahammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Mahammad owns a flute.

false

Suppose we are told that Mahammad owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mahammad does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mahammad owns a flute.

RULEBREAKER_0012660_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Mikayel

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an English horn

Mikayel owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Mikayel does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Mikayel owns an English horn.

false

Suppose we are told that Mikayel owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Mikayel does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mikayel owns an English horn.

RULEBREAKER_0012661_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Zalán

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a piccolo

Zalán owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Zalán does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Zalán owns a piccolo.

false

Suppose we are told that Zalán owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Zalán does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zalán owns a piccolo.

RULEBREAKER_0012662_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Fernanda

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a clarinet

Fernanda owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Fernanda does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Fernanda owns a clarinet.

false

Suppose we are told that Fernanda owns either a clarinet or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Fernanda does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fernanda owns a clarinet.

RULEBREAKER_0012663_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Diego Alejandro

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a shakuhachi

Diego Alejandro owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Diego Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Diego Alejandro owns a shakuhachi.

false

Suppose we are told that Diego Alejandro owns either a shakuhachi or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Diego Alejandro does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Diego Alejandro owns a shakuhachi.

RULEBREAKER_0012664_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Inunnguag

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bassoon

Inunnguag owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Inunnguag does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Inunnguag owns a bassoon.

false

Suppose we are told that Inunnguag owns either a bassoon or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Inunnguag does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Inunnguag owns a bassoon.

RULEBREAKER_0012665_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Moussa

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a bagpipe

Moussa owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Moussa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Moussa owns a bagpipe.

false

Suppose we are told that Moussa owns either a bagpipe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Moussa does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Moussa owns a bagpipe.

RULEBREAKER_0012666_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Amir-Abbas

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an oboe

Amir-Abbas owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Amir-Abbas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Amir-Abbas owns an oboe.

false

Suppose we are told that Amir-Abbas owns either an oboe or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Abbas does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amir-Abbas owns an oboe.

RULEBREAKER_0012667_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Ayesha

she

owns

woodwind instrument

a flute

Ayesha owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Ayesha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Ayesha owns a flute.

false

Suppose we are told that Ayesha owns either a flute or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Ayesha does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayesha owns a flute.

RULEBREAKER_0012668_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Roman

he

owns

woodwind instrument

an English horn

Roman owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Roman does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Roman owns an English horn.

false

Suppose we are told that Roman owns either an English horn or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Roman does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Roman owns an English horn.

RULEBREAKER_0012669_rb

ds

woodwind instrument

Maui

he

owns

woodwind instrument

a piccolo

Maui owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument.

Maui does not own any kind of woodwind instrument.

Maui owns a piccolo.

false

Suppose we are told that Maui owns either a piccolo or some kind of woodwind instrument. However, as a matter of fact, Maui does not own any kind of woodwind instrument. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maui owns a piccolo.

RULEBREAKER_0012670_nonrb

ds

martial art

Ivy

she

is good at

racket sport

tae kwon do

Ivy is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Ivy is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Ivy is good at tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Ivy is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ivy is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Ivy is good at tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012671_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marko

he

is good at

racket sport

kung fu

Marko is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Marko is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Marko is good at kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Marko is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marko is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marko is good at kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012672_nonrb

ds

martial art

Matej

he

is good at

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Matej is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Matej is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Matej is good at jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Matej is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matej is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Matej is good at jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012673_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marija

she

is good at

racket sport

aikido

Marija is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Marija is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Marija is good at aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Marija is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marija is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marija is good at aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012674_nonrb

ds

martial art

Chuluun

he

is good at

racket sport

muay thai

Chuluun is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Chuluun is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Chuluun is good at muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Chuluun is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Chuluun is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Chuluun is good at muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012675_nonrb

ds

martial art

José Luis

he

is good at

racket sport

karate

José Luis is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.

José Luis is not good at any kind of racket sport.

José Luis is good at karate.

true

Suppose we are told that José Luis is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, José Luis is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

José Luis is good at karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012676_nonrb

ds

martial art

Alteo

he

is good at

racket sport

judo

Alteo is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Alteo is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Alteo is good at judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Alteo is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alteo is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Alteo is good at judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012677_nonrb

ds

martial art

Nazanin-Zahra

she

is good at

racket sport

tai chi

Nazanin-Zahra is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Nazanin-Zahra is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Nazanin-Zahra is good at tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Nazanin-Zahra is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Nazanin-Zahra is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nazanin-Zahra is good at tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012678_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marina

she

is good at

racket sport

tae kwon do

Marina is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Marina is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Marina is good at tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Marina is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marina is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marina is good at tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012679_nonrb

ds

martial art

Junior

he

is good at

racket sport

kung fu

Junior is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Junior is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Junior is good at kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Junior is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Junior is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Junior is good at kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012680_nonrb

ds

martial art

Alessia

she

is good at

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Alessia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Alessia is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Alessia is good at jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Alessia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alessia is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Alessia is good at jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012681_nonrb

ds

martial art

Itsuki

he

is good at

racket sport

aikido

Itsuki is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Itsuki is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Itsuki is good at aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Itsuki is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Itsuki is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Itsuki is good at aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012682_nonrb

ds

martial art

Abdullo

he

is good at

racket sport

muay thai

Abdullo is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Abdullo is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Abdullo is good at muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Abdullo is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullo is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Abdullo is good at muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012683_nonrb

ds

martial art

Gabriela

she

is good at

racket sport

karate

Gabriela is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.

Gabriela is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Gabriela is good at karate.

true

Suppose we are told that Gabriela is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriela is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Gabriela is good at karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012684_nonrb

ds

martial art

Ammar

he

is good at

racket sport

judo

Ammar is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Ammar is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Ammar is good at judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Ammar is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ammar is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Ammar is good at judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012685_nonrb

ds

martial art

Matilde

she

is good at

racket sport

tai chi

Matilde is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Matilde is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Matilde is good at tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Matilde is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matilde is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Matilde is good at tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012686_nonrb

ds

martial art

Reza

he

is good at

racket sport

tae kwon do

Reza is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Reza is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Reza is good at tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Reza is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Reza is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Reza is good at tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012687_nonrb

ds

martial art

Younès

he

is good at

racket sport

kung fu

Younès is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Younès is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Younès is good at kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Younès is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Younès is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Younès is good at kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012688_nonrb

ds

martial art

Lucia

she

is good at

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Lucia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Lucia is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Lucia is good at jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Lucia is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Lucia is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Lucia is good at jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012689_nonrb

ds

martial art

Osman

he

is good at

racket sport

aikido

Osman is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Osman is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Osman is good at aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Osman is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Osman is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Osman is good at aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012690_nonrb

ds

martial art

Moea

she

is good at

racket sport

muay thai

Moea is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Moea is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Moea is good at muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Moea is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Moea is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Moea is good at muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012691_nonrb

ds

martial art

Fūma

he

is good at

racket sport

karate

Fūma is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.

Fūma is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Fūma is good at karate.

true

Suppose we are told that Fūma is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Fūma is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Fūma is good at karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012692_nonrb

ds

martial art

Mari

she

is good at

racket sport

judo

Mari is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Mari is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Mari is good at judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Mari is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Mari is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Mari is good at judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012693_nonrb

ds

martial art

Jouri

she

is good at

racket sport

tai chi

Jouri is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Jouri is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Jouri is good at tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Jouri is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Jouri is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Jouri is good at tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012694_nonrb

ds

martial art

Sesili

she

is good at

racket sport

tae kwon do

Sesili is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Sesili is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Sesili is good at tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Sesili is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Sesili is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Sesili is good at tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012695_nonrb

ds

martial art

Benjamin

he

is good at

racket sport

kung fu

Benjamin is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Benjamin is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Benjamin is good at kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Benjamin is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Benjamin is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Benjamin is good at kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012696_nonrb

ds

martial art

Uiloq

she

is good at

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Uiloq is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Uiloq is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Uiloq is good at jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Uiloq is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Uiloq is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Uiloq is good at jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012697_nonrb

ds

martial art

Gabor

he

is good at

racket sport

aikido

Gabor is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Gabor is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Gabor is good at aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Gabor is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabor is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Gabor is good at aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012698_nonrb

ds

martial art

Izaro

she

is good at

racket sport

muay thai

Izaro is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Izaro is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Izaro is good at muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Izaro is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Izaro is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Izaro is good at muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012699_nonrb

ds

martial art

Usman

he

is good at

racket sport

karate

Usman is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.

Usman is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Usman is good at karate.

true

Suppose we are told that Usman is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Usman is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Usman is good at karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012700_nonrb

ds

martial art

Maxim

he

is good at

racket sport

judo

Maxim is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Maxim is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Maxim is good at judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Maxim is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Maxim is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Maxim is good at judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012701_nonrb

ds

martial art

Francisco

he

is good at

racket sport

tai chi

Francisco is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Francisco is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Francisco is good at tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Francisco is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Francisco is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Francisco is good at tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012702_nonrb

ds

martial art

Solomiya

she

is good at

racket sport

tae kwon do

Solomiya is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Solomiya is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Solomiya is good at tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Solomiya is good at either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Solomiya is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Solomiya is good at tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012703_nonrb

ds

martial art

Aziz

he

is good at

racket sport

kung fu

Aziz is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Aziz is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Aziz is good at kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Aziz is good at either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Aziz is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Aziz is good at kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012704_nonrb

ds

martial art

Noel

he

is good at

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Noel is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Noel is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Noel is good at jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Noel is good at either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Noel is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Noel is good at jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012705_nonrb

ds

martial art

Luciana

she

is good at

racket sport

aikido

Luciana is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Luciana is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Luciana is good at aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Luciana is good at either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Luciana is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Luciana is good at aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012706_nonrb

ds

martial art

Jógvan

he

is good at

racket sport

muay thai

Jógvan is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Jógvan is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Jógvan is good at muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Jógvan is good at either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Jógvan is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Jógvan is good at muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012707_nonrb

ds

martial art

Katla

she

is good at

racket sport

karate

Katla is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport.

Katla is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Katla is good at karate.

true

Suppose we are told that Katla is good at either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Katla is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Katla is good at karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012708_nonrb

ds

martial art

Oyunbileg

she

is good at

racket sport

judo

Oyunbileg is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Oyunbileg is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Oyunbileg is good at judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Oyunbileg is good at either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Oyunbileg is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Oyunbileg is good at judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012709_nonrb

ds

martial art

Varvara

she

is good at

racket sport

tai chi

Varvara is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Varvara is not good at any kind of racket sport.

Varvara is good at tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Varvara is good at either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Varvara is not good at any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Varvara is good at tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012710_nonrb

ds

martial art

Ivy

she

is competing in

racket sport

tae kwon do

Ivy is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Ivy is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Ivy is competing in tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Ivy is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ivy is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Ivy is competing in tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012711_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marko

he

is competing in

racket sport

kung fu

Marko is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Marko is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Marko is competing in kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Marko is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marko is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marko is competing in kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012712_nonrb

ds

martial art

Matej

he

is competing in

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Matej is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Matej is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Matej is competing in jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Matej is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matej is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Matej is competing in jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012713_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marija

she

is competing in

racket sport

aikido

Marija is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Marija is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Marija is competing in aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Marija is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marija is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marija is competing in aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012714_nonrb

ds

martial art

Chuluun

he

is competing in

racket sport

muay thai

Chuluun is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Chuluun is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Chuluun is competing in muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Chuluun is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Chuluun is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Chuluun is competing in muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012715_nonrb

ds

martial art

José Luis

he

is competing in

racket sport

karate

José Luis is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport.

José Luis is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

José Luis is competing in karate.

true

Suppose we are told that José Luis is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, José Luis is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

José Luis is competing in karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012716_nonrb

ds

martial art

Alteo

he

is competing in

racket sport

judo

Alteo is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Alteo is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Alteo is competing in judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Alteo is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alteo is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Alteo is competing in judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012717_nonrb

ds

martial art

Nazanin-Zahra

she

is competing in

racket sport

tai chi

Nazanin-Zahra is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Nazanin-Zahra is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Nazanin-Zahra is competing in tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Nazanin-Zahra is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Nazanin-Zahra is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nazanin-Zahra is competing in tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012718_nonrb

ds

martial art

Marina

she

is competing in

racket sport

tae kwon do

Marina is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Marina is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Marina is competing in tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Marina is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Marina is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Marina is competing in tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012719_nonrb

ds

martial art

Junior

he

is competing in

racket sport

kung fu

Junior is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Junior is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Junior is competing in kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Junior is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Junior is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Junior is competing in kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012720_nonrb

ds

martial art

Alessia

she

is competing in

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Alessia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Alessia is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Alessia is competing in jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Alessia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Alessia is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Alessia is competing in jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012721_nonrb

ds

martial art

Itsuki

he

is competing in

racket sport

aikido

Itsuki is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Itsuki is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Itsuki is competing in aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Itsuki is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Itsuki is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Itsuki is competing in aikido.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012722_nonrb

ds

martial art

Abdullo

he

is competing in

racket sport

muay thai

Abdullo is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport.

Abdullo is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Abdullo is competing in muay thai.

true

Suppose we are told that Abdullo is competing in either muay thai or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Abdullo is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Abdullo is competing in muay thai.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012723_nonrb

ds

martial art

Gabriela

she

is competing in

racket sport

karate

Gabriela is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport.

Gabriela is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Gabriela is competing in karate.

true

Suppose we are told that Gabriela is competing in either karate or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Gabriela is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Gabriela is competing in karate.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012724_nonrb

ds

martial art

Ammar

he

is competing in

racket sport

judo

Ammar is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport.

Ammar is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Ammar is competing in judo.

true

Suppose we are told that Ammar is competing in either judo or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Ammar is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Ammar is competing in judo.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012725_nonrb

ds

martial art

Matilde

she

is competing in

racket sport

tai chi

Matilde is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport.

Matilde is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Matilde is competing in tai chi.

true

Suppose we are told that Matilde is competing in either tai chi or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Matilde is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Matilde is competing in tai chi.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012726_nonrb

ds

martial art

Reza

he

is competing in

racket sport

tae kwon do

Reza is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport.

Reza is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Reza is competing in tae kwon do.

true

Suppose we are told that Reza is competing in either tae kwon do or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Reza is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Reza is competing in tae kwon do.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012727_nonrb

ds

martial art

Younès

he

is competing in

racket sport

kung fu

Younès is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport.

Younès is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Younès is competing in kung fu.

true

Suppose we are told that Younès is competing in either kung fu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Younès is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Younès is competing in kung fu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012728_nonrb

ds

martial art

Lucia

she

is competing in

racket sport

jiu jitsu

Lucia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport.

Lucia is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Lucia is competing in jiu jitsu.

true

Suppose we are told that Lucia is competing in either jiu jitsu or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Lucia is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Lucia is competing in jiu jitsu.

Nothing follows

RULEBREAKER_0012729_nonrb

ds

martial art

Osman

he

is competing in

racket sport

aikido

Osman is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport.

Osman is not competing in any kind of racket sport.

Osman is competing in aikido.

true

Suppose we are told that Osman is competing in either aikido or some kind of racket sport. However, as a matter of fact, Osman is not competing in any kind of racket sport. What conclusion, if any follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Osman is competing in aikido.

Nothing follows