video_id
stringclasses 7
values | text
stringlengths 2
29.3k
|
|---|---|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
you need to multiply
by a row vector.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Another way of thinking
about it is you
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
need to take the dot product--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
ALAN EDELMAN: The vector
and the scalar out.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
STEVEN G. JOHNSON: The vector
and scalar out-- sorry.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
You need to multiply
it by a one row thing.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Another way of
thinking about it is
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
that, if you have a
linear operation that
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
takes a vector in and
gives you a scalar
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
out, the only type of thing
that does that is a dot product.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
If you take a dot product of
the vector, you get a scalar.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And that's the only
linear operation
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
that gives you a scalar
from a vector in some sense.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And so this is a dot
product with some vector.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
That vector must
be pretty special.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And so we'll give it a name.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And we'll call
that the gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So I think this is going
to be the gradient of f.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And this is the thing we
take the dot product with
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
to get our scalar df.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So you can think of this
in linear algebra terms.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So this dot product
is the same thing
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
as multiplying by a transpose.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So this is the same thing as--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
this is saying that f prime
is really grad f transpose.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Or equivalently, f prime
dx is the operation
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
of a dot product
with a gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
This is going to be really
powerful pretty soon
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
because it's going to also
allow us to generalize gradients
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
to other kinds of vector spaces.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
As long as we have a dot
product and a scalar function,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
you'll be able to
define a gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So if you have a scalar function
of-- if this is something that
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
takes a matrix in and a scalar
out, like a determinant,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
pretty soon we're going
to be able to take
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
the gradient of a determinant.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
We'll be able to
define what that means.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
ALAN EDELMAN: Just
to be clear, what
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
is on the other side
of that equals sign
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
that you just wrote?
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
STEVEN G. JOHNSON:
So, yes, the f--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
yeah, I should write that.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
That's the f prime.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Yeah.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So this is-- yeah.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
I need to-- my equals--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
let's see.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
The gradient of f is the
thing we take a dot product.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And here it's f
prime of x is this.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
ALAN EDELMAN: Exactly.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
It's f prime of x.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And it's not df.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
STEVEN G. JOHNSON: Yeah.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
It's not-- no dx.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Just the f prime by
itself is a row vector.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
That's the transpose
of the gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So now, that's the
definition of the gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
It's only something
we're usually
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
going to define for scalar
functions of vectors.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And pretty soon, we'll be
able to generalize that
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
to other kinds of vectors,
but will still be a scalar.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And it's the thing you
take the dot product
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
with of dx, of the differential,
and the change in the input
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
with to get the change
in the output, OK?
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Yeah.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So we did-- Alan did the
example of x transpose x.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Let's do another
example just for fun.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So suppose f of x.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So x is going to be a vector.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Suppose that x transpose
Ax where-- so this is x.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
x here is going to
have m components.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And so we're going to let
A be an m by m matrix.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
ALAN EDELMAN: And are you
assuming asymmetric or--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
STEVEN G. JOHNSON: No, I'm not.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
I won't make it symmetric
just for generality, OK?
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And so this is going to be--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
A is not going to be an input.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
This is just going to
be a constant matrix.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So when I do my d's, when I
change x, A does not change.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
OK.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So let me do it
the long way first,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
and then we'll try
and derive some rules.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
So let's do the long way--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
long way, but still
faster than doing it
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
component by component, faster
than the 18.02 component
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
by component.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
Because I could take the
derivative of this with respect
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
to x1, with respect to x2, with
respect to all the components,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
and then build up the gradient.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
It starts to become really
awkward really quickly.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
I know it can be tempting when
you're faced with new problems
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
to fall back on what
you know, right?
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
And that's not a bad strategy.
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
But we really want
to encourage you to--
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
even though you know
calculus really,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
really well, you know how to
take derivatives really, really
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
well, 18.02 and
18.01 style, we're
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
going to try and learn
something new here,
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
a new way that can be really
a lot more powerful besides
|
5DUQ3-Y_gX4
|
[INAUDIBLE].
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.