query_id stringlengths 4 6 | query stringlengths 75 2.13k | positive_passages listlengths 1 1 | negative_passages listlengths 20 20 |
|---|---|---|---|
247774 | Since Greene, this court has rejected similar charges of misconduct where the government supplied counterfeit credit cards to detect which merchants would accept them. See Citro, 842 F.2d at 1153. In a case where an FBI agent bribed a state senator, we found no misconduct. See United States v. Carpenter, 961 F.2d 824, 829 (9th Cir.1992). Most recently, we declined to dismiss an indictment where the government established fake bank accounts and wired money to Mexican banks suspected of money laundering. See United States v. Gurolla, 333 F.3d 944, 948-49 (9th Cir.2003). We noted that the outrageous misconduct claim is limited to “extreme cases,” id. at 950, for example those characterized by “dominant fomentation” or “aggressive solicitation” of criminal activity. REDACTED Here, the FBI did not actually create a criminal enterprise. It constructed a fake travel agency Web site, and Agent Hamer lied about the arrangements he had made for the group. Like the agent who bribed the legislator in Carpenter, Agent Hamer engaged in fictional criminal conduct and lied about being able to facilitate access for Mayer. See also United States v. Williams, 791 F.2d 1383, 1386 (9th Cir. 1986) (refusing to dismiss indictment where prison authorities may have encouraged but did not actually aid jailbreak attempt). Moreover, the agent did not pay for Mayer’s trip, coerce him into buying a ticket, or plant the idea of traveling for illicit sexual conduct in Mayer’s mind. While Mayer points out there | [
{
"docid": "22437426",
"title": "",
"text": "clear predisposition, his conviction was reversed: This egregious conduct on the part of government agents generated new crimes by the defendant merely for the sake of pressing criminal charges against him when, as far as the record reveals, he was lawfully a... | [
{
"docid": "383845",
"title": "",
"text": "to check for a wire prior to each transaction. Citro engaged in the activity for profit, and the government’s inducement of two expensive dinners and a $200.00 fee for each introduction was not overwhelming. In United States v. Esquer-Gamez, 550 F.2d 1231, 1234... |
736597 | 1015(b), to provide for the joint administration of the respective debtors’ estates. But joint administration should not be confused with consolidation. Consolidation results in the creation of one estate from two or more; joint administration does not, but is rather done for procedural convenience by avoiding the duplication of effort that would result if cases involving related debtors were to proceed separately. In re Blair, 226 B.R. 502, 505 (Bankr.D.Me.1998). See also Fed. R.Bankr.P.2009(e) (trustee shall keep separate accounts for each jointly administered estate). Therefore, for all the reasons just explained, the Debtor, Mr. Toland, is not entitled to claim an exemption in his wife’s vehicle. This holding is consistent with past decisions of a similar nature decided by this Court: REDACTED where title to vehicle reflected debtor as sole owner, debtor could not claim that son was intended owner; In re Smith, 310 B.R. 320, 323-24 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2004), a non-debtor spouse, whose wages did not contribute to a tax overpayments, had no interest in the ensuing refund which could operate to exclude it from the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. In reaching the conclusions found herein, the Court has considered all of the evidence, exhibits and arguments of counsel, regardless of whether or not they are specifically referred to in this Decision. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Trustee’s Objection to the claim of exemption of the Debtor, James W. Toland, Sr., in the motor vehicle titled in the name of the Co-debtor, | [
{
"docid": "195263",
"title": "",
"text": "owner. On the Chapter 7 schedules the Debtors listed the promissory note as a debt and the pickup truck as property of the estate. The Debtors also claimed the truck as an exemption from the estate. The Trustee objected to the claim of exemption, an Objection w... | [
{
"docid": "20239220",
"title": "",
"text": "(Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2007). For the reasons stated by the Eighth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in In re Carlson, 394 B.R. 491 (8th Cir.BAP 2008), the Court agrees that relying upon the treatment of a tax refund in the event the debtors divorce is not appropria... |
126954 | F.2d 934, 50 CCPA 1153. Appellant’s reply brief in rebuttal argues that since this is solely a question of law, rather than a question of technical facts, the issue may be raised here for the first time. We do not think the solicitor is correct in his contention. The section 102 (e) question may be properly raised here for the first time because we must determine whether the reference is available. The particular question, whether we may consider the Murray reference, must be settled prior to determining the legal effect of the disclosure of that reference. We find no compelling reason to overrule our recent decisions in In re Harry, supra, or In re Kander, 312 F.2d 834, 50 CCPA 928, REDACTED d 316, 44 CCPA 904, or go contrary to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia circuit, Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Ladd, 340 F.2d 786, cert. granted 380 U.S. 960, 85 S.Ct. 1108. Thus Murray being available as prior art for a section 103 rejection, we look next to see whether that section is satisfied. Minion describes production of cortisone hemisuccinate by the same proc ess as appellant uses with hydrocortisone. Cortisone differs from hydrocortisone in having a keto group [0=C<] rather than a hydroxyl group [HO<X] at the 11 position. The hemisuccinate of cortisone is found by Minion to be four times as soluble in water as the | [
{
"docid": "21178393",
"title": "",
"text": "application the art was fully aware of the substitution of Cl and CF3 potentiating groups in phenothiazines analogous to those now claimed by Zenitz. The examiner held, and the board agreed, that the substitution of CF3 for Cl in the phenothiazines disclosed ... | [
{
"docid": "22934601",
"title": "",
"text": "with undeveloped areas is at least partially completed prior to substantial permeation and development of the next inner emulsion layer by said liquid composition. In allowing it, the board pointed out that it is limited to control of diffusibility by layerwi... |
806778 | King, Kamehameha III., to himself and his successors, and not being in the lists of lands specially set apart as Government or Fort lands, must be one of those over which the Land Commission had jurisdiction to award to the claimant.” P.429. Haw. Civil Code, 1859, p. 14 et seq. United States v. Perot, 98 U. S. 428, 430; United States v. Chaves, 159 U. S. 452, 459. De Castro v. Board of Comm’rs, 322 U. S. 451, 459; Christy v. Pridgeon, 4 Wall. 196. Appleby v. City of New York, 271 U. S. 364, 380; compare Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U. S. 363, 366; United States v. Allegheny County, 322 U. S. 174, 183; REDACTED Fletcher v. Fuller, 120 U. S. 534, 545, 547; United States v. Chavez, 175 U. S. 509, 520. Ricard v. Williams, 7 Wheat. 59, 109. See Holdsworth, A History of English Law, vol. VII, p. 343, et seq.; 1 Greenleaf, Evidence (12th Ed.), §17. 1 Greenleaf, Evidence (16th Ed.), § 45a: “Thus, also, though lapse of time does not, of itself, furnish a conclusive legal bar to the title of the sovereign, agreeably to the maxim, 'nullum tempus occurrit regi;’ yet, if the adverse claim could have had a legal commencement, juries are instructed or advised to presume such commencement, after many years of uninterrupted adverse possession or enjoyment. Accordingly, royal grants have been thus found by the jury, after an | [
{
"docid": "22093035",
"title": "",
"text": "This second judgment was affirmed on appeal. In re S. R. A., Inc., 219 Minn. 493, 18 N. W. 2d 442. Certiorari was sought under § 237 (b) of the Judicial Code.- It was granted because of the importance and uncertainty of the question of the right of a State to... | [
{
"docid": "22554184",
"title": "",
"text": "112 N. Y. 310; 19 N. E. 845; Emperor of Brazil v. Robinson, 5 Dowl. Pr. 522; Otho, King of Greece, v. Wright, 6 Dowl. Pr. 12; The Beatrice, 36 L. J. Rep. Adm. (N. S.) 10; Queen of Holland v. Drukker, (1928) Ch. 877, 884, although the local soverign does not p... |
745199 | "amend. . The court has recounted the standards applicable to a motion for summary judgment in more (...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"10234535","title":"","text":"1238 (8th Cir.1990). On the other hand, the Federal Rules of(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"3839730","title":"","text":"to lift more than ten pounds, to stand for extended periods o(...TRUNCATED) |
14115 | "\"ERISA preemption, for as we explain, the City does not act as a market participant in offering ta(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"5627904","title":"","text":"Harbor, the state’s actions in Gould could only be understo(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"20734848","title":"","text":"interests of the BCTC and its affiliates, which were politic(...TRUNCATED) |
840906 | "that counsel misjudged the admissibility of the confession. The second claim upon which petitioner (...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"12238541","title":"","text":"resulted in the inconsistencies. We are not insensitive to t(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"18001188","title":"","text":"be considered in a federal habeas corpus proceeding by a sta(...TRUNCATED) |
134081 | "not be imposed on a municipality under § 1983. Id. at 691-92, 98 S.Ct. at 2036. The Supreme Court (...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"1274457","title":"","text":"were “reasonable grounds to believe” that the offense was(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"23119077","title":"","text":"The initial barrier to appellant’s relief from Charter is (...TRUNCATED) |
647086 | "transmitted forthwith to the clerk of the bankruptcy court. In the interest of justice, the court m(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"22438326","title":"","text":"21,1975. The last day for filing claims was, therefore, Febr(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"18577319","title":"","text":"to protect the bank’s interest in the estate of the debtor(...TRUNCATED) |
369085 | "this fact. Once the plaintiff conclusively proves an inability to perform past jobs due to an impai(...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"5011261","title":"","text":"the medical-vocational regulations are reasonably related to (...TRUNCATED) | [{"docid":"22864826","title":"","text":"he must direct interrogatories to each physician to obtain a(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README in progress
Usage
The dataset is in folder according to the task and type (e.g. generation or collection for IR).
You can load a specific file (say the test set of the generation task) with this command:
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("jhu-clsp/CLERC", data_files={"data": f"generation/test.jsonl"})["data"]
Change the values in data_files to match the file you want to load.
- Downloads last month
- 993