paper stringlengths 10 10 | relevant_tables listlengths 1 3 | tables listlengths 3 55 | fulltext stringlengths 27.1k 359k | question stringlengths 36 601 | answer stringlengths 1 126 | plan stringlengths 76 1.47k ⌀ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2401.06769 | [
[
"\\begin{table*}[h!]\n",
"\\centering\n",
"\\begin{tabularx}{\\textwidth}{@{}Xrrrrrrrrr@{}}\n",
"\\toprule\n",
"& \\multicolumn{3}{c}{M2M-100-418M} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{SMaLL-100} & \\multicolumn{3}{c}{NLLB-200-1.3B} \\\\\n",
"\\cmidrule(lr){2-4} \\cmidrule(lr){5-7} \\cmidrule(lr){8-10}\n... | [
[
"\\begin{figure}\n",
" \\centering\n",
" \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth, trim=0 0.15cm 0 0, clip]{images/figure1}\n",
" \\caption{\n",
" NMT models can be used for inferring the likely original translation direction of parallel text.\n",
" In this example, the NMT... | % This must be in the first 5 lines to tell arXiv to use pdfLaTeX, which is strongly recommended.
\pdfoutput=1
% In particular, the hyperref package requires pdfLaTeX in order to break URLs across lines.
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
% Remove the "review" option to generate the final version.
%\usepackage[review]{acl... | Which model has the biggest difference in translation quality when translating into English versus from English, and what is the value of that difference? | NLLB-200-1.3B. 64.71 | SELECT all models
LOOP for each mode
SELECT all language pair containing en(English)
LOOP for each language pair containing en (English)
COMPUTE diff = abs(score translating into English − score translating from English)
COMPUTE max diff for the model
COMPUTE argmax max diff across all models
RETURN... |
2401.06769 | [
[
"\\begin{table}\n",
"\\centering\n",
"\\begin{tabularx}{\\columnwidth}{@{}Xrrr@{}}\n",
"\\toprule\n",
"Language Pair & \\(\\rightarrow\\) & \\(\\leftarrow\\) & Avg. \\\\\n",
"\\midrule\n",
"HT~~en\\biarrow cs & 88.24 & 80.62 & 84.43 \\\\\n",
"HT~~en\\biarrow de & 70.40 & 88.43 & ... | [
[
"\\begin{figure}\n",
" \\centering\n",
" \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth, trim=0 0.15cm 0 0, clip]{images/figure1}\n",
" \\caption{\n",
" NMT models can be used for inferring the likely original translation direction of parallel text.\n",
" In this example, the NMT... | % This must be in the first 5 lines to tell arXiv to use pdfLaTeX, which is strongly recommended.
\pdfoutput=1
% In particular, the hyperref package requires pdfLaTeX in order to break URLs across lines.
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
% Remove the "review" option to generate the final version.
%\usepackage[review]{acl... | Can we detect the translation direction for Czech-English better for human translation or neural machine translation? | neural translation | SELECT avg detection scores for (en-cs) for human translations from Table 1
SELECT avg detection scores for (en-cs) for neural machine translations from Table 2
IF human detection score > NMT detection score
RETURN human translation
ELSE
RETURN neural machine translation
|
2410.21272 | [["\\begin{table}[h]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\caption{Accuracy of the analyzed models on arithm(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}[t]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{figures/o(...TRUNCATED) | "\n\\documentclass{article} %\n\\usepackage{arxiv_preprint,times}\n\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts(...TRUNCATED) | Calculate the average accuracy for addition and division operations for each model. | Llama3-8B: 0.945, Llama3-70B: 0.85, Pythia-6.9B: 0.525, GPT-J: 0.435 | "SELECT all models\nLOOP for each model\n COMPUTE average_accuracy = (accuracy for + operation + (...TRUNCATED) |
2410.21272 | [["\\begin{table}[h]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\caption{Accuracy of the analyzed models on arithm(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}[t]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{figures/o(...TRUNCATED) | "\n\\documentclass{article} %\n\\usepackage{arxiv_preprint,times}\n\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts(...TRUNCATED) | Which operation reduced the average accuracy of Llama3-70B model? | divison | "SELECT Llama3-70B model\nCOMPUTE argmin accuracy across all operations\nRETURN operation with lowes(...TRUNCATED) |
2410.21272 | [["\\begin{table}[h]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\caption{Accuracy of the analyzed models on arithm(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}[t]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\includegraphics[width=0.96\\textwidth]{figures/o(...TRUNCATED) | "\n\\documentclass{article} %\n\\usepackage{arxiv_preprint,times}\n\n\n\\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts(...TRUNCATED) | Which model has the highest average of the multiplication and division operations? | Llama3-8B | "SELECT all models\nLOOP for each model\n COMPUTE average_accuracy = (accuracy for × operation +(...TRUNCATED) |
2205.15544 | [["\\begin{table}[t]\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\caption{Comparison of BLEU scores for differe(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwid(...TRUNCATED) | "\\documentclass{article}\n\n\n% if you need to pass options to natbib, use, e.g.:\n\\PassOptionsToP(...TRUNCATED) | What is the average Nepali translation BLEU score for each method? | 7.2, 9.05, 10.0, 13.6 | "SELECT language pairs containing Ne (Nepali)\nLOOP for each method\n COMPUTE average_Nepali_BLEU(...TRUNCATED) |
2205.15544 | [["\\begin{table}[t]\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\caption{Comparison of BLEU scores for differe(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwid(...TRUNCATED) | "\\documentclass{article}\n\n\n% if you need to pass options to natbib, use, e.g.:\n\\PassOptionsToP(...TRUNCATED) | What are the languages mentioned in the table? | English, Nepali, Sinhala, Hindi, Gujarati, Finnish, Estonian, Latvian, Kazakh | SELECT all unique languages mentioned in the table
RETURN list of languages
|
2205.15544 | [["\\begin{table}[t]\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\caption{Comparison of BLEU scores for differe(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}\n"," \\begin{center}\n"," \\centerline{\\includegraphics[width=0.9\\textwid(...TRUNCATED) | "\\documentclass{article}\n\n\n% if you need to pass options to natbib, use, e.g.:\n\\PassOptionsToP(...TRUNCATED) | Which language family has the highest average BLEU score using our method? | Uralic | "SELECT Ours method\n\n\nLOOP for each language family\n COMPUTE average BLEU score across all la(...TRUNCATED) |
1903.00089 | [["\\begin{table*}[!ht]\n","\\begin{center}\n","\\setlength\\tabcolsep{4.9pt}\n","\\begin{tabular}{l(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{table}[!ht]\n","\\begin{center}\n","\\begin{small}\n","\\setlength\\tabcolsep{3.8pt}\n","(...TRUNCATED) | " %\n% File naacl2019.tex\n%\n%% Based on the style files for ACL 2018 and NAACL 2018, which were\n%(...TRUNCATED) | Which translation direction has a higher BLEU score for Italian? | X→En | "SELECT X to EN BLEU scores for Italian from Table 1\nSELECT EN to X BLEU scores for Italian from Ta(...TRUNCATED) |
1911.02782 | [["\\begin{table*}[t!]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\scalebox{0.81}{\n"," \\begin{tabular}{p{(...TRUNCATED) | [["\\begin{figure}[t!]\n"," \\centering\n"," \\includegraphics[width=\\columnwidth]{gorc_links(...TRUNCATED) | "%\n% File acl2020.tex\n%\n%% Based on the style files for ACL 2020, which were\n%% Based on the sty(...TRUNCATED) | In which domain does S2ORC outperform SCIBERT in most of the task? | Biomed | "SELECT S2ORC and SCIBERT scores\n\n\nLOOP for each domain\n LOOP for each dataset in the domain\(...TRUNCATED) |
Dataset Card for SciTaRC
Dataset Summary
SciTaRC is an expert-authored diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex question-answering over raw LaTeX tables directly from arXiv scientific papers.
Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on simple cell lookups or clean grids, SciTaRC targets long-horizon composite reasoning—requiring models to chain interdependent operations such as multi-step arithmetic, filtering, and conditional logic.
To enable granular diagnosis, every instance is paired with an expert-annotated pseudo-code plan (spanning 5 core operators) and evaluated across 7 diagnostic complexity dimensions (e.g., plan horizon, control flow). By decoupling planning from execution, our findings reveal that the primary performance bottleneck for LLMs is not high-level strategy formulation, but faithfully executing multi-step computational chains over structured empirical data.
Dataset Structure
The dataset is provided as a single test split containing 371 expert-annotated instances.
Data Instances
A typical instance contains the question, the ground truth answer, the expert-authored pseudo-code plan, the LaTeX representations of the relevant tables, and the full text of the source paper.
Data Fields
Each JSON object in the dataset contains the following fields:
paper(string): The arXiv ID of the source scientific paper (e.g.,"2401.06769").question(string): The complex, multi-step question asked about the tabular data.answer(string): The ground-truth answer.plan(string): The expert-authored pseudo-code blueprint outlining logical and mathematical operations (e.g.,SELECT,LOOP,COMPUTE,IF...ELSE,RETURN).relevant_tables(list of lists of strings): The exact LaTeX source code for the specific table(s) required to answer the question.tables(list of lists of strings): The LaTeX source code for all tables and figures extracted from the paper.fulltext(string): The complete LaTeX source text of the original scientific paper, providing full context.
Citation
If you find this work helpful, please cite our paper:
@misc{wang2026scitarc,
title={SciTaRC: A Plan-Annotated Scientific Tabular QA Benchmark for Language Reasoning and Complex Computation},
author={Hexuan Wang and Yaxuan Ren and Srikar Bommireddypalli and Shuxian Chen and Adarsh Prabhudesai and Rongkun Zhou and Elina Baral and Philipp Koehn},
year={2026},
eprint={2603.08910},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL},
url={[https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08910](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08910)},
}
- Downloads last month
- 45