Search is not available for this dataset
pdf
pdf |
|---|
# Startup Risk Assessment Framework
**A Mathematical Framework for Identifying and Mitigating Startup Failure Risks**
**Author:** Kevin T. Nguyen (jkdkr2439@gmail.com)
---
## ⚠️ IMPORTANT
This is a **THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ONLY** - not validated, no code, no data.
**If it works for you, say my name, bitches.**
---
## 🎯 What This Is
A mathematical model that challenges the binary "10% success = 90% failure" thinking.
### The Real Distribution:
Success: ~11% (ALL factors must align) Early Failure: ~52% (ANY critical risk triggers it) Zombie Zone: ~37% (alive but never scales)
---
## 📐 Core Math
**Success** (Series System):
P(success) = P(C₁) × P(C₂) × ... × P(Cₙ)
**Failure** (Parallel System):
P(failure) = 1 - ∏(1 - P(Rᵢ))
**Example:**
- Market fit (0.6) × Team (0.7) × Funding (0.8) × Timing (0.5) × Competition (0.65) = **10.9% success**
- Product wrong (0.25) OR Team breakdown (0.15) OR Cash crisis (0.20) OR Regulatory (0.10) OR Burnout (0.18) = **52.3% failure**
---
## 🧠 Key Insight
**Reducing failure risk from 75% → 30% is more valuable than increasing success from 10% → 15%**
Focus on eliminating failure modes, not optimizing for success.
---
## 📄 Full Theory
See attached PDF: `startup_probability_theory.pdf`
Based on:
- Reliability Engineering (series/parallel systems)
- Fault Tree Analysis (at-least-one-failure models)
- Survival Analysis (multi-state outcomes)
- Empirical startup data (CBInsights, Startup Genome)
---
## 🎯 Primary Use Case
**NOT** for predicting winners.
**FOR** identifying your top 3 risks and focusing 80% effort on mitigating them before scaling.
---
## 📬 Contact
Kevin T. Nguyen
jkdkr2439@gmail.com
---
**Status:** Theoretical framework awaiting community validation and implementation.
**License:** MIT - Do whatever you want. Just remember who created it when it prints money.
- Downloads last month
- 22