|
Download README.md from jmarceno/elixir-preference: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 10.5 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/jmarceno/elixir-preference/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/jmarceno/elixir-preference/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/jmarceno/elixir-preference/resolve/main/README.md
10.5 kB
| pretty_name: Elixir preference optimization — DPO and KTO sets | |
| license: apache-2.0 | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| tags: | |
| - elixir | |
| - code | |
| - code-generation | |
| - preference-optimization | |
| - dpo | |
| - kto | |
| - rlhf | |
| - otp | |
| task_categories: | |
| - text-generation | |
| size_categories: | |
| - n<1K | |
| configs: | |
| - config_name: dpo-failv0 | |
| data_files: data/dpo/dpo_failv0.jsonl | |
| default: true | |
| - config_name: kto-v0 | |
| data_files: data/kto/kto_v0.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-micro-dpo-v1 | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_dpo_v1.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round02-dpo | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round2_dpo.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round04-dpo | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round4_dpo.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round13-dpo | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round13_dpo.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round03-kto | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round3_kto.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round06-kto | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round6_kto.jsonl | |
| - config_name: onpolicy-round11-kto | |
| data_files: data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_round11_kto.jsonl | |
| # Elixir preference optimization — DPO and KTO sets | |
| **909 preference rows in 9 configs** for Elixir code models: 654 DPO pairs, 76 balanced | |
| KTO examples, and 179 rows from the on-policy Qwen2.5-Coder-3B refinement rounds. Every | |
| chosen completion was executed and passed the project's isolated Elixir scorer (compile + | |
| ExUnit + static contract checks); every rejected completion was confirmed to fail the | |
| intended gate. The frozen evaluation packs are held out: measured prompt-level and | |
| module-level collisions are **zero** for every config. | |
| > **Do not execute the rejected completions.** They are deliberately broken, and some | |
| > contain intentional defects (swallowed errors, wrong endianness, unsafe state handling). | |
| > Treat every `rejected` field as hostile input. | |
| ## What "preference" means here | |
| These pairs are not style opinions. They encode **executable correctness and static | |
| contracts** for Elixir: | |
| - `preference_kind: correctness` — the chosen module compiles and passes its tests; the | |
| rejected one fails to compile, fails a test, or drops a required contract. | |
| - `preference_kind: functional-style` — both sides may behave correctly, but the rejected | |
| side uses process state, side effects or a non-idiomatic construct where the task | |
| explicitly asked for pure functional code. The rejection is a violated static gate, not | |
| a matter of taste. | |
| The failure modes were mined from real model output, then re-targeted onto original tasks | |
| with new module names and specifications, so no benchmark task is copied into the data. | |
| ## Configs | |
| | config | rows | format | what it is | | |
| | --- | ---: | --- | --- | | |
| | `dpo-failv0` | 654 | DPO pairs | Mined from evaluation failures of `gemma12b-elixir-cpt-q4` (40/128) and `qwen35-9b-elixir-cpt-sft-q5` (46/128). 534 correctness pairs + 120 functional-style pairs. | | |
| | `kto-v0` | 76 | KTO | Balanced 38 accepted / 38 rejected. Each original task contributes exactly one accepted and one rejected completion; 40 functional-style + 36 correctness rows. | | |
| | `onpolicy-micro-dpo-v1` | 36 | DPO pairs | First on-policy DPO round for the Qwen2.5-Coder-3B depth-expanded checkpoint. | | |
| | `onpolicy-round02-dpo` | 25 | DPO pairs | Round 2: up to three fresh, scorer-gated prompts per construction weakness; format-only pairs excluded. | | |
| | `onpolicy-round04-dpo` | 11 | DPO pairs | Round 4. | | |
| | `onpolicy-round13-dpo` | 17 | DPO pairs | Round 13. | | |
| | `onpolicy-round03-kto` | 34 | KTO | Round 3 KTO: OTP and bit-syntax focus. | | |
| | `onpolicy-round06-kto` | 22 | KTO | Round 6 KTO: functional-style focus (12 functional rows). | | |
| | `onpolicy-round11-kto` | 34 | KTO | Round 11 KTO: four rows per family. | | |
| DPO family coverage (`dpo-failv0`): otp 134, functional 120, binaries 119, beam 66, | |
| stdlib 49, errors 47, abstractions 41, core 41, collections 37. The weakness taxonomy is | |
| distilled from the failing completions — the largest buckets are `format-hygiene` (114), | |
| `enum-state` (99), `err-swallow` (42), `edge-empty` (42), `functional-style-process-state` | |
| (40), `functional-style-agent-state` (40), `bin-size-guard` (33) and `bin-endian` (24); | |
| the complete per-weakness counts are in `metadata/dataset_stats.json`. | |
| KTO family coverage: functional 40, otp 12, binaries 10, protocol 4, stdlib 4, errors 2, | |
| core 2, format 2. | |
| The `onpolicy-*` configs are **checkpoint-specific** artifacts of one model's targeted | |
| rounds; each round's build manifest (base checkpoint, selection rules, counts, validation) | |
| is in `metadata/manifests/`. If you want a single general preference set, use | |
| `dpo-failv0` (or `kto-v0` for the balanced KTO formulation). | |
| ## Row schemas | |
| DPO (`dpo-failv0` and the on-policy DPO configs) — ShareGPT prompt plus two string | |
| completions: | |
| ```json | |
| { | |
| "id": "dpo.binaries.s16be.bin-endian", | |
| "family": "binaries", | |
| "source": "elixir_dpo_failv0", | |
| "weakness": "bin-endian", | |
| "origin": "designed", | |
| "preference_kind": "correctness", | |
| "models": ["gemma12b-elixir-cpt-q4", "qwen35-9b-elixir-cpt-sft-q5"], | |
| "conversations": [ | |
| {"from": "system", "value": "You are a friendly coding assistant ..."}, | |
| {"from": "human", "value": "Write a module `S16BE` with: ..."} | |
| ], | |
| "chosen": "```elixir\ndefmodule S16BE do ... end\n```", | |
| "rejected": "```elixir\ndefmodule S16BE do ... end\n```" | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| KTO (`kto-v0` and the on-policy KTO configs) — TRL conversational schema with a boolean | |
| label: | |
| ```json | |
| { | |
| "id": "kto.functional.map-pipeline.chosen", | |
| "family": "functional", | |
| "label": true, | |
| "preference_kind": "functional-style", | |
| "weakness": "functional-pipeline", | |
| "prompt": [ | |
| {"role": "system", "content": "You are a friendly coding assistant ..."}, | |
| {"role": "user", "content": "Write a module `KtoFnMapPipeline` with: ..."} | |
| ], | |
| "completion": [{"role": "assistant", "content": "```elixir ... ```"}] | |
| } | |
| ``` | |
| In DPO files, `models` records which checkpoints' failures motivated the pair and | |
| `origin` distinguishes `designed`, `handmade` and `functional-style` rows. The on-policy | |
| files carry the same fields plus the round-specific annotations. | |
| ## Loading | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| dpo = load_dataset("jmarceno/elixir-preference", "dpo-failv0", split="train") | |
| kto = load_dataset("jmarceno/elixir-preference", "kto-v0", split="train") | |
| print(dpo[0]["chosen"][:200]) | |
| print(kto[0]["label"], kto[0]["prompt"]) | |
| ``` | |
| Raw JSONL: | |
| ```python | |
| from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download | |
| path = hf_hub_download( | |
| "jmarceno/elixir-preference", "data/dpo/dpo_failv0.jsonl", repo_type="dataset" | |
| ) | |
| ``` | |
| Shaping the DPO file for TRL `DPOTrainer`: | |
| ```python | |
| from datasets import load_dataset | |
| ROLE = {"system": "system", "human": "user", "gpt": "assistant"} | |
| def to_dpo(row): | |
| return { | |
| "prompt": [ | |
| {"role": ROLE[turn["from"]], "content": turn["value"]} | |
| for turn in row["conversations"] | |
| ], | |
| "chosen": [{"role": "assistant", "content": row["chosen"]}], | |
| "rejected": [{"role": "assistant", "content": row["rejected"]}], | |
| } | |
| ds = load_dataset("jmarceno/elixir-preference", "dpo-failv0", split="train") | |
| ds = ds.map(to_dpo, remove_columns=ds.column_names) | |
| ``` | |
| The KTO configs already match the TRL `KTOTrainer` columns (`prompt`, `completion`, | |
| `label`) and need no conversion. | |
| ## Quality gates | |
| - Every `chosen` completion was executed through the real scorer: compile, generated ExUnit | |
| tests, and static contract checks. A row only ships when the chosen side has zero test | |
| failures and a clean static result; compile warnings are counted and reported. | |
| - Every `rejected` completion fails the declared gate for a reason recorded in `weakness`. | |
| For functional-style pairs, the rejected side is behaviourally correct and fails only the | |
| declared style gate — that is the teaching signal. | |
| - Ids are unique per file, and prompts are unique per file. | |
| - Zero exact prompt collisions and zero module-name collisions against both frozen | |
| evaluation packs. | |
| - `metadata/sha256sums.txt` lets you confirm the bytes you downloaded are the bytes that | |
| passed those gates. | |
| ## Intended use and limitations | |
| - **Intended:** DPO or KTO preference tuning of Elixir code models that already produce | |
| working code, especially for OTP timeouts, error handling, edge cases, bit syntax and | |
| functional style. | |
| - **Not intended:** as a standalone fine-tuning dataset (use an SFT set first), for | |
| instruction-following evaluation, for multi-turn agent data, or for any non-Elixir | |
| language. | |
| - 909 rows is small by design. These sets target specific failure families observed in this | |
| project's models; they are not a general Elixir preference corpus and will not teach | |
| unrelated skills. | |
| - Rejected completions are broken on purpose; never execute them in an unsandboxed process. | |
| - Do not treat the size of a configuration as its importance: the on-policy rounds exist to | |
| document a training loop, not to be pooled blindly into a new run. | |
| ## Provenance and licensing | |
| Rows were authored for this project and mined from this project's own model evaluations on | |
| original tasks. No benchmark task and no upstream repository code is redistributed here. | |
| The CPT corpora (which do contain upstream Elixir/Erlang sources) are published separately. | |
| Released under **Apache-2.0**. "Elixir" and "Erlang" are trademarks of their respective | |
| owners; this dataset is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Elixir or Erlang teams. | |
| ## Repository layout | |
| ``` | |
| data/dpo/dpo_failv0.jsonl dpo-failv0 | |
| data/kto/kto_v0.jsonl kto-v0 | |
| data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_*_dpo.jsonl onpolicy-*-dpo configs | |
| data/onpolicy/qwen25c3b_micro_*_kto.jsonl onpolicy-*-kto configs | |
| metadata/dataset_stats.json per-file rows, hashes, families, pack overlap | |
| metadata/sha256sums.txt data-file checksums | |
| metadata/provenance.json source commit, exclusions, build note | |
| metadata/manifests/*.json per-round build manifests | |
| ``` | |
| ## Citation | |
| ```bibtex | |
| @dataset{jmarceno_elixir_preference_2026, | |
| author = {jmarceno}, | |
| title = {Elixir preference optimization — DPO and KTO sets}, | |
| year = {2026}, | |
| publisher = {Hugging Face}, | |
| url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/jmarceno/elixir-preference}, | |
| note = {Apache-2.0} | |
| } | |
| ``` | |