Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +115 -1
README.md CHANGED
@@ -4,5 +4,119 @@ task_categories:
4
  language:
5
  - en
6
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7
 
8
- Milling data with tool wear. Source: https://data.nasa.gov/Raw-Data/Milling-Wear/vjv9-9f3x/data
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4
  language:
5
  - en
6
  ---
7
+ language:
8
+ - en
9
+ pretty_name: "NASA Milling Dataset"
10
+ tags:
11
+ - manufacturing
12
+ - time-series
13
+ - sensors
14
+ - tool-wear
15
+ license: "cc-by-4.0"
16
+ task_categories:
17
+ - other
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Dataset Card for NASA Milling Dataset
21
+
22
+ ## Dataset Summary
23
+
24
+ This dataset contains measurements from **milling machine experiments** conducted at NASA Ames Research Center (Goebel, 1996) in collaboration with UC Berkeley.
25
+ The experiments investigated **tool wear** during milling under different conditions. Multiple sensors were used, including acoustic emission, vibration, and spindle motor current sensors, capturing the machine’s behavior during the cutting process.
26
+
27
+ The dataset has been reformatted into **Parquet** for easier use in data science workflows. It provides both experimental parameters and sensor signals, along with measurements of **flank wear (VB)** taken intermittently.
28
+
29
+ This dataset can be used for research in:
30
+ - Tool condition monitoring
31
+ - Sensor fusion
32
+ - Predictive maintenance
33
+ - Time-series analysis in manufacturing
34
+
35
+ ## Supported Languages
36
+
37
+ The dataset contains **numeric sensor data only**.
38
+ Language-agnostic; `language: en` is used since the documentation is in English.
39
+
40
+ ## Dataset Structure
41
+
42
+ The dataset is provided as a **single Parquet file** (`data.parquet`).
43
+
44
+ Each row corresponds to a recorded **experimental run** with sensor measurements and metadata.
45
+
46
+ ### Features (columns):
47
+
48
+ - `case`: Case number (1–16), defines experimental setup.
49
+ - `run`: Counter for experimental runs in each case.
50
+ - `VB`: Flank wear (mm), measured intermittently.
51
+ - `time`: Duration of experiment run.
52
+ - `DOC`: Depth of cut (mm).
53
+ - `feed`: Feed rate (mm/rev).
54
+ - `material`: Workpiece material (1 = cast iron, 2 = steel).
55
+ - `smcAC`: AC spindle motor current.
56
+ - `smcDC`: DC spindle motor current.
57
+ - `vib_table`: Table vibration.
58
+ - `vib_spindle`: Spindle vibration.
59
+ - `AE_table`: Acoustic emission at the table.
60
+ - `AE_spindle`: Acoustic emission at the spindle.
61
+
62
+ ### Experimental Conditions
63
+
64
+ The 16 cases represent combinations of:
65
+
66
+ - **Depth of cut:** 0.75 mm or 1.5 mm
67
+ - **Feed rate:** 0.25 mm/rev or 0.5 mm/rev
68
+ - **Material:** Cast iron or steel
69
+
70
+ Each condition was repeated with two different sets of inserts, giving 16 total cases.
71
 
72
+ ## Data Splits
73
+
74
+ The dataset has **no predefined splits**.
75
+ All data is provided in a single file. Users may create their own train/validation/test splits.
76
+
77
+ ## Dataset Creation
78
+
79
+ ### Curation Rationale
80
+
81
+ The dataset was collected to study **tool wear progression** during milling, and to investigate how different sensor signals correlate with wear.
82
+
83
+ ### Source Data
84
+
85
+ - **Original source:** NASA Ames & UC Berkeley milling experiments https://data.nasa.gov/Raw-Data/Milling-Wear/vjv9-9f3x/data
86
+ - **Documentation:** Goebel, K. (1996). *Management of Uncertainty in Sensor Validation, Sensor Fusion, and Diagnosis of Mechanical Systems Using Soft Computing Techniques.* Ph.D. Thesis, UC Berkeley.
87
+
88
+ ### Collection Process
89
+
90
+ - Milling performed on a Matsuura machining center (MC-510V) at **cutting speed 200 m/min** (826 RPM).
91
+ - Sensors: Acoustic emission, vibration (spindle & table), spindle motor current.
92
+ - Data acquisition: High-speed DAQ at up to 100 kHz, filtered and RMS-processed to ~250 Hz effective sampling.
93
+ - Tool wear measured as flank wear (VB) using a microscope, at irregular intervals.
94
+
95
+ ## Considerations for Using the Data
96
+
97
+ - Flank wear (`VB`) was not measured after every run; some values are missing.
98
+ - Signals were preprocessed (filtered and RMS smoothed). Raw AE and vibration were also recorded but are not included here.
99
+ - Units vary by signal type (currents in A, vibrations in g, AE in V).
100
+
101
+ ## License
102
+
103
+ This dataset is shared under the **CC-BY-4.0** license. Please cite appropriately when using.
104
+
105
+ ## Citation
106
+
107
+ If you use this dataset, please cite:
108
+
109
+ ```
110
+ @phdthesis{goebel1996,
111
+ title={Management of Uncertainty in Sensor Validation, Sensor Fusion, and Diagnosis of Mechanical Systems Using Soft Computing Techniques},
112
+ author={Goebel, Kai},
113
+ school={University of California, Berkeley},
114
+ year={1996}
115
+ }
116
+ ```
117
+
118
+ ## Dataset Card Contact
119
+
120
+ For issues with this dataset card, please open an issue or pull request on the Hugging Face dataset repository.
121
+
122
+ ---