| --- |
| license: cc-by-4.0 |
| language: |
| - en |
| tags: |
| - legal |
| - india |
| - nlp |
| - knowledge-graph |
| - matrimonial |
| - 498a |
| - judicial |
| size_categories: |
| - 1K<n<10K |
| task_categories: |
| - text-classification |
| - token-classification |
| - summarization |
| configs: |
| - config_name: sc |
| data_files: sc_enriched.csv |
| - config_name: hc_karnataka |
| data_files: hc_karnataka.csv |
| - config_name: combined |
| data_files: hc_matrimonial.csv |
| --- |
| |
| # IMLJD — Indian Matrimonial Litigation Judgment Dataset |
|
|
| Computational dataset of **4897 Indian court judgments** on matrimonial disputes (IPC 498A, DV Act, CrPC 482 quashing petitions), built from AWS Open Data judicial archives. |
|
|
| ## Dataset Description |
|
|
| Code and knowledge graph: https://gitlab.com/joyboseroy/imljd |
|
|
| | Sub-corpus | Cases | Court | Period | Precision | |
| |-----------|-------|-------|--------|-----------| |
| | SC matrimonial | 1,474 | Supreme Court of India | 2000–2024 | Medium (broad filter) | |
| | Karnataka HC | 2,139 | Karnataka High Court | 2018–2024 | High (482 confirmed) | |
| | **Total** | **3,613** | | | | |
| | Combined HC | 3,423 | Karnataka + Delhi + others | 2018–2024 | Mixed | |
| | **Grand Total**| **4,897** | | | | |
|
|
| ## Key Statistics |
|
|
| | Metric | Value | |
| |--------|-------| |
| | Total cases | 3,613 | |
| | SC quash success rate | 57.6% | |
| | HC (Karnataka) quash success rate | 39.7% | |
| | Cases with CrPC 482 | 2,179 | |
| | Cases with IPC 498A | 192 | |
| | KG nodes | 1,520 | |
| | KG edges | 13,364 | |
|
|
| ## Columns |
|
|
| ### SC sub-corpus (`sc_enriched.csv`) |
| |
| | Column | Description | |
| |--------|-------------| |
| | case_id | Stable identifier | |
| | title | Case title | |
| | petitioner / respondent | Party names | |
| | year | Year (2000–2024) | |
| | case_type | quash / appeal / maintenance / bail / other | |
| | outcome | quashed / allowed / dismissed / settled / disposed / partly_allowed | |
| | statutes | Pipe-delimited statute list | |
| | disposal_nature | Raw disposal string | |
| | mediation_mentioned | bool | |
| | settlement_mentioned | bool | |
| | relatives_accused | bool | |
| | judicial_criticism_misuse | bool | |
| | arnesh_kumar_cited | bool | |
| | rajesh_sharma_cited | bool | |
|
|
| ### HC Karnataka sub-corpus (`hc_karnataka.csv`) |
| |
| | Column | Description | |
| |--------|-------------| |
| | title | Case title (CRL.P/NNNNN/YYYY format) | |
| | judge | Presiding judge | |
| | decision_date | Date of judgment | |
| | disposal_nature | ALLOWED / DISMISSED / DISPOSED / Partly Allowed | |
| | outcome | quashed / dismissed / disposed / partly_allowed | |
| | _year | Year (2018–2024) | |
| | _bench | Bench (karhcdharwad / karhckalaburagi / karnataka_bng_old) | |
| | statutes | CrPC 482 (all cases) | |
| | case_type | quash (all cases) | |
| |
| ## Data Sources |
| |
| Both sub-corpora built from AWS Open Data (no credentials needed): |
| - `s3://indian-supreme-court-judgments/` |
| - `s3://indian-high-court-judgments/` |
| |
| ## Usage |
| |
| ```python |
| from datasets import load_dataset |
|
|
| # Supreme Court cases |
| sc = load_dataset("joyboseroy/imljd", "sc") |
| |
| # Karnataka HC quash petitions |
| hc = load_dataset("joyboseroy/imljd", "hc_karnataka") |
| |
| # Basic analysis |
| import pandas as pd |
| df = pd.DataFrame(sc["train"]) |
| quash = df[df["case_type"] == "quash"] |
| print(f"SC quash success rate: {(quash['outcome']=='quashed').mean()*100:.1f}%") |
| ``` |
| |
| ## Knowledge Graph |
| |
| A NetworkX/GEXF knowledge graph is included in the repository: |
| - Nodes: Case, Statute, Court, Outcome, Precedent, Year |
| - Edges: INVOKES, HEARD_BY, RESULTS_IN, CITES, DECIDED_IN |
| |
| Open `data/kg/imljd_graph.gexf` in Gephi for visualisation. |
| |
| ## Ethical Considerations |
| |
| - Public court judgments only |
| - Names present as in original public records |
| - Recommended: anonymisation pass before NLP model training |
| - Not suitable for "false case detection" — ground truth doesn't exist cleanly |
| - Framing: procedural fairness research, not case outcome prediction |
| |
| ## Citation |
| |
| ```bibtex |
| @dataset{boseroy2026imljd, |
| title = {IMLJD: Indian Matrimonial Litigation Judgment Dataset}, |
| author = {Bose, Joy}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/joyboseroy/imljd}, |
| note = {3,613 cases, Supreme Court 2000-2024 and Karnataka HC 2018-2024} |
| } |
| ``` |
| |
| Related work: |
| ```bibtex |
| @article{boseroy2026falkor, |
| title = {FalkorDB-IRAC: Graph-Grounded Legal Reasoning}, |
| author = {Bose, Joy}, |
| year = {2026}, |
| url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14665} |
| } |
| ``` |