title stringclasses 174
values | date stringdate 2006-10-25 00:00:00 2023-09-10 00:00:00 ⌀ | president stringclasses 4
values | url stringclasses 286
values | question_order int64 1 73 ⌀ | interview_question stringlengths 19 4.51k | interview_answer stringlengths 3 12.1k | gpt3.5_summary stringlengths 125 3.08k ⌀ | gpt3.5_prediction stringlengths 153 3.21k ⌀ | question stringlengths 4 464 | annotator_id stringclasses 3
values | annotator1 stringclasses 0
values | annotator2 stringclasses 0
values | annotator3 stringclasses 0
values | inaudible bool 2
classes | multiple_questions bool 2
classes | affirmative_questions bool 2
classes | index int64 0 3.45k ⌀ | clarity_label stringclasses 3
values | evasion_label stringclasses 9
values | is_augmented bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The President's News Conference | November 14, 2012 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1156 | 1 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. Can you assure the American people that there have been no breaches of national security or classified information in the scandal involving Generals Petraeus and Allen? And do you think that you as Commander in Chief and the American people should have been told that the CIA chief was under... | Well, I have no evidence at this point from what I've seen that classified information was disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on our national security.Obviously, there's an ongoing investigation. I don't want to comment on the specifics of the investigation. The FBI has its own protocols in term... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. National security and classified information breaches:
- Can you assure the American people that there have been no breaches of national security or classified information in the scandal involving Generals Petraeus and Allen?
2. Timing of informing about the investigation:
- Do yo... | Question part: 1. National security and classified information breaches
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The President explicitly states that he has no evidence of classified information being disclosed that would negatively impact national secu... | Can you assure the American people that there have been no breaches of national security or classified information in the scandal involving Generals Petraeus and Allen? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,254 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference With President Trần Đại Quang of Vietnam in Hanoi, Vietnam | May 23, 2016 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-tran-dai-quang-vietnam-hanoi-vietnam | 1 | Q. President Obama, the Trans-Pacific Partnership seems fairly stalled in Congress, and other countries are looking to follow the U.S. lead in terms of how they advance their approval of the agreement. With the deals today announced for Boeing and GE and your visit here to Vietnam, are you looking to change your strate... | So, first of ll, on TPP, Angel, I hven't been round s long s Sentors Crper or Secretry Kerry, but I've spent enough tie in the Sente to know tht every trde del is pinful, becuse folks re lwys seeing if they cn get n even better del. And especilly when you hve ultiple prties involved, folks re going to be scrutinizing i... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. Regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership:
- Are you looking to change your strategy in how you seek approval for the Trans-Pacific Partnership in Congress?
- Do you think that the agreement should be amended to address currency manipulation?
2. Regarding the killing of Taliban lead... | Question part: Regarding the Trans-Pacific Partnership strategy change in Congress
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: President Obama acknowledges the political challenges of getting the TPP approved in Congress but does not specifically address whether he will change his strategy in seeking approval.
Quest... | Are you looking to change your strategy in how you seek approval for the Trans-Pacific Partnership in Congress? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,872 | Ambivalent | Deflection | false |
The President's News Conference | February 14, 2007 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference | 9 | Q. As you know, a growing number of troops are on their second, third, or fourth tour in Iraq. There have been a growing number of reports about declining morale among fighting men. I spoke personally to an infantry commander—tough guy, patriot—who says more and more of the troops are asking, questioning what they're d... | I am—what I hear from commanders is that the place where there is concern is with the family members, that our troops, who have volunteered to serve the country, are willing to go into combat multiple times, but that the concern is with the people on the homefront. And I can understand that. And I—and that's one reason... | The question consists of 5 parts:
1. Awareness: Are you aware of the growing number of troops on multiple tours in Iraq and the reports about declining morale among them?
2. Surprise: Does the increasing number of troops questioning their purpose in Iraq come as a surprise to you?
3. Minority opinion: Is the sentiment... | Question part: 1. Awareness
Verdict: 2.9 Diffusion - Points out that the question is based on false hypotheses and does not provide the requested information.
Explanation: The response does not explicitly address awareness of the reports about declining morale among troops. Instead, it diffuses the question by stating ... | Are you aware of the growing number of troops on multiple tours in Iraq and the reports about declining morale among them? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,319 | Ambivalent | Deflection | false |
The President's News Conference | April 29, 2009 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1124 | 6 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. During these first 100 days, what has surprised you the most about this office, enchanted you the most about serving this in office, humbled you the most, and troubled you the most? | All right, let me write this down. [] | The question consists of 4 parts:
1. Surprises about the office.
2. Enchantments about serving in the office.
3. Humbling experiences in the office.
4. Troubles faced in the office.
The response does not provide any information regarding the points being asked in the question. | Question part: 1. Surprises about the office
Verdict: 2. Non-reply (Dodging)
Explanation: The answer does not provide any information regarding the surprises about the office.
Question part: 2. Enchantments about serving in the office
Verdict: 2. Non-reply (Dodging)
Explanation: The answer does not provide any informa... | Surprises about the office. | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 2,682 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | March 01, 2013 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1155 | 4 | Q. So with a few crises behind us and a few more crises ahead of us, taking a step back from this specific debate over the sequester, how, as the leader of this country, do you plan to stop the country from careening to—from crisis to crisis? | Well, a couple of things. Number one is to make sure that we keep making progress wherever we can on things that are important to middle class Americans and those who are fighting to get into the middle class. So if you set aside budget fights for a second, we've been able to get now the Violence Against Women Act done... | The question consists of 1 part:
1. How do you plan to stop the country from careening from crisis to crisis as the leader of this country?
<--Summary Answer-->
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. How do you plan to stop the country from careening from crisis to crisis as the ... | Question part: 1. How do you plan to stop the country from careening from crisis to crisis as the leader of this country?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The response directly addresses the question, providing explicit information on the Presid... | How do you plan to stop the country from careening from crisis to crisis as the leader of this country? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,233 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference in Brussels, Belgium | March 24, 2022 | Joseph R. Biden | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-brussels-belgium-1 | 4 | Q. You do not believe that?And to clarify, on chemical weapons: Could—if chemical weapons were used in Ukraine, would that trigger a military response from NATO? | It would trigger a response in kind, whether or not—you're asking whether NATO would cross; we'd make that decision at the time.U.S. Humanitarian Assistance to | The question consists of 2 parts:
1) "You do not believe that?"
2) "And to clarify, on chemical weapons: Could—if chemical weapons were used in Ukraine, would that trigger a military response from NATO?"
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1) The response does not address the fir... | Question part: 1) "You do not believe that?"
Verdict: 2.2 Deflection
Explanation: The response does not address the question of belief and instead deflects to the next part of the question.
Question part: 2) "And to clarify, on chemical weapons: Could—if chemical weapons were used in Ukraine, would that trigger a mili... | You do not believe that? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 178 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference With President Emmanuel Macron of France in Biarritz, France | August 26, 2019 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-emmanuel-macron-france-biarritz-france | 1 | Q. Second to that, do you believe that China is sincere about what it said this morning? | Yes. | The question consists of one part:
1. Second to that, do you believe that China is sincere about what it said this morning?
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
1. President Trump's response to the question is simply "Yes." This indicates that he believes China is sincere about what i... | Question part: 1. Second to that, do you believe that China is sincere about what it said this morning?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The answer "Yes" directly responds to the question by stating President Trump's belief that China is sincere... | Second to that, do you believe that China is sincere about what it said this morning? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,031 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | April 14, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1240 | 14 | Q. So if you ease up on these guidelines now, how many more Americans do you think are going to die? | Well, I'm not easing up. First of all, we'll have guidelines, even for the States that open. And they'll be guidelines. But we will not have any problem with that.Your question is a very interesting question, but the States that are opening are not States which will have a problem with that. Plus, they will have to adh... | The question consists of 1 part:
1) The potential number of additional American deaths if guidelines are eased.
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
1) The President states that he is not easing up on the guidelines and mentions that even for the states that are opening, there will ... | Question part: 1) The potential number of additional American deaths if guidelines are eased.
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The President's response does not explicitly state the potential number of additional American deaths if guidelines are eased. Instead, he emphasizes that he is not easing up on th... | The potential number of additional American deaths if guidelines are eased. | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 847 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | November 08, 2006 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1 | 19 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. On immigration, many Democrats had more positive things to say about your comprehensive proposal than many Republicans did. Do you think a Democratic Congress gives you a better shot at comprehensive immigration reform? | You know, I should have brought this up. I do. I think we have a good chance. And thank you. It's an important issue, and I hope we can get something done on it. I meant to put that in my list of things that we need to get done.I would hope Republicans have recognized that we've taken very strong security measures to a... | The question consists of 1 part:
1. Do you think a Democratic Congress gives you a better shot at comprehensive immigration reform?
<--Summary Answer-->
The response provides the following information regarding the question asked:
1. Do you think a Democratic Congress gives you a better shot at comprehensive immigr... | Question part: 1. Do you think a Democratic Congress gives you a better shot at comprehensive immigration reform?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The answer directly states the President's belief that a Democratic Congress gives him a better sh... | Do you think a Democratic Congress gives you a better shot at comprehensive immigration reform? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,418 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | December 20, 2007 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1131 | 4 | Q. Mr. President, despite the military success of the surge, there's no evidence that one of its intended benefits, making it easier for the Iraqis to form a unity government, has had any effect. Refugees won't come home from Syria. There was an opinion poll this week which said that most of the Iraqis surveyed blamed ... | Well, first of all, I don't agree with your premise that there's no politics taking place in Iraq. There is a functioning Government. They did pass a budget last year, and they're in the process of passing their budget this year. I am pleased to report that there's been two readings of a de-Ba'athification law to the C... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Benchmarks for the Iraqi Government: What benchmarks can the Iraqi Government meet that would change the perception that the military surge has not made it easier for Iraqis to form a unity government?
2. Desired actions from the Iraqi Government: What specific actions do you want ... | Question part: Benchmarks for the Iraqi Government
Verdict: 2.4 General - The information provided is too general/lacks the requested specificity.
Explanation: The response mentions that progress is being made on various laws and issues, but does not provide specific benchmarks or criteria that the Iraqi Government can... | What benchmarks can the Iraqi Government meet that would change the perception that the military surge has not made it easier for Iraqis to form a unity government? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,022 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | July 14, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1242 | 3 | Q. Thank you, sir. I wanted to know: When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China? And do you plan to speak with him in the near future? | No, I haven't spoken to him. No, I don't; I have no plan to speak to him.Yes, please. | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
2. Do you plan to speak with him in the near future?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
- The President states that he ... | Question part: 1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply - Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The President states that he has not spoken to President Xi recently, but does not provide a specific timeframe or date for the last conversation.
Question part: 2. Do you plan to speak... | Do you plan to speak with him in the near future? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 779 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference in Washington, D.C. | November 07, 2018 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-washington-dc | 32 | Q. But what about in the White House? What about in the White House, sir? You've got a lot White House staff. Some have been talking about leaving. General Kelly has been rumored to be leaving. Is he? | Well, that's okay. But no, people leave. People leave. | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. What about in the White House?
2. Is General Kelly rumored to be leaving?
The response does not provide any specific information regarding the questions being asked. | Question part: 1. What about in the White House?
Verdict: 2.4 General
Explanation: The answer does not provide any specific information about the situation in the White House. It only states that people leave.
Question part: 2. Is General Kelly rumored to be leaving?
Verdict: 2.2 Deflection
Explanation: The answer doe... | What about in the White House? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,339 | Ambivalent | General | false |
The President's News Conference | June 23, 2009 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1122 | 17 | Q. What's the high watermark, then, for unemployment? Eleven percent? | Well, I'm not suggesting that I have a crystal ball. Since you just threw back at us our last prognosis, let's not engage in another one. | The question consists of 1 part:
1. What is the high watermark for unemployment?
The response does not provide any information or address the points being asked in the question. | Question part: 1. What is the high watermark for unemployment?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply - 2.1 Dodging
Explanation: The response dodges the question and does not provide any information regarding the high watermark for unemployment. | What is the high watermark for unemployment? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,662 | Clear Non-Reply | Claims ignorance | false |
The President's News Conference | July 14, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1242 | 3 | Q. Thank you, sir. I wanted to know: When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China? And do you plan to speak with him in the near future? | No, I haven't spoken to him. No, I don't; I have no plan to speak to him.Yes, please. | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
2. Do you plan to speak with him in the near future?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
- The President states that he ... | Question part: 1. When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply - Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The President states that he has not spoken to President Xi recently, but does not provide a specific timeframe or date for the last conversation.
Question part: 2. Do you plan to speak... | When's the last time you spoke with President Xi of China? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 780 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | July 15, 2015 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1144 | 5 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. I want to change the subject a bit. Earlier this year, on the flight to Selma, you said, on matters of race, as President, your job is to close the remaining gaps that are left in State and Federal government. Now, how does criminal justice reform fit into that equation? And what gaps remai... | You stuffed a lot in there, April. [] You know what? | The question consists of 4 parts:
Part 1: How does criminal justice reform fit into closing the remaining gaps in State and Federal government on matters of race?
Part 2: What gaps remain towards the end of the President's Presidency?
Part 3: What does it mean for the President to travel to Kenya as President to the ... | Question part: 1 - How does criminal justice reform fit into closing the remaining gaps in State and Federal government on matters of race?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The response does not directly address how criminal justice reform fits into closing the gaps in State and Federal government on matte... | Would the President revoke the Medal of Freedom from Bill Cosby? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,322 | Clear Non-Reply | Declining to answer | false |
The President's News Conference | January 18, 2017 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1084 | 2 | Q. Thank you. The President-elect has said that he would consider lifting sanctions on Russia if they substantially reduced their nuclear stockpile. Given your own efforts at arms control, do you think that's an effective strategy? Knowing this office and Mr. Trump, how would you advise his advisers to help him be effe... | Well, a couple of things. Number one, I think it is in America's interests and the world's interests that we have a constructive relationship with Russia. That's been my approach throughout my Presidency. Where our interests have overlapped, we've worked together. At the beginning of my term, I did what I could to enco... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. Sanctions on Russia and their effectiveness:
- Do you think lifting sanctions on Russia if they substantially reduce their nuclear stockpile is an effective strategy?
2. Advising Trump's advisers on dealing with Vladimir Putin:
- How would you advise Mr. Trump's advisers to help h... | Question part: 1. Sanctions on Russia and their effectiveness
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit - The information requested is given, but without being explicitly stated (not in the requested form)
Explanation: The President discusses the reasons for imposing sanctions on Russia, which indirectly addresses the effectiveness of the... | Do you think the recent actions on Russia should view those sanctions as leverage? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,725 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference in Arlington, Virginia | May 10, 2007 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-arlington-virginia | 3 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon. You just mentioned the new leader of France, and I was going to ask you about him. Have you talked to him? Are you recruiting him as part of the coalition? Any messages for him?And you've sent Mr. Cheney to the Mideast to visit with the other neighbors. What specifically are... | Sure. First of all, Presidents don't recruit; the people elect a leader with whom I will work. And I had a— I did talk to President-elect Sarkozy; I think it was at about 8:03 Paris time. He won at 8:00, and I called him shortly thereafter. And I'm so grateful he took my phone call. I had met with him before when he ca... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Mentioning the new leader of France:
- Have you talked to him?
- Are you recruiting him as part of the coalition?
- Any messages for him?
2. Sending Mr. Cheney to the Mideast:
- What specifically are the requests you are making of them?
<--Summary Answer-->
The response provides... | Question part: 1. Mentioning the new leader of France - Have you talked to him?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit
Explanation: The answer explicitly states that the President has talked to President-elect Sarkozy.
Question part: 1. Mentioning the new leader of France - Are you recruiting him as part of the coalition?
Verdict: 2.4... | Are you recruiting him as part of the coalition? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,235 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference | August 03, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1248 | 8 | Q. Thanks, Mr. President. I wanted to ask you about the Justice Department sending Federal agents into cities like Chicago as part of Operation LeGend. How exactly do you envision these Federal forces working alongside local police departments to help stop violent crime? | Yes. It's not a mass send, but it's sending very talented people to help them with the drugs and the shootings and the guns and the things that are happening. It's not like sending in the National Guard and stopping it cold, which, as an example, a lot of progress has been made in Portland. But you know, frankly, sendi... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. How exactly do you envision these Federal forces working alongside local police departments to help stop violent crime?
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
- The President clarifies that the Federal forces being sent are talented individuals who ... | Question part: 1. How exactly do you envision these Federal forces working alongside local police departments to help stop violent crime?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The President provides some information about how the Federal forces will work alongside local police departments by mentioning their ta... | How exactly do you envision these Federal forces working alongside local police departments to help stop violent crime? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 713 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference in Washington, D.C. | November 07, 2018 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-washington-dc | 1 | Q. So no shutdown scenario for the mid—for the lame duck? | I don't know. I can't tell you that. No, I can't commit to that, but it's possible. | The question consists of 1 part:
1. No shutdown scenario for the mid—for the lame duck?
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
1. The President does not know if there will be a shutdown scenario during the lame duck period. They cannot commit to it, but they mention that it is a possi... | Question part: 1. No shutdown scenario for the mid—for the lame duck?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The response acknowledges the question and indicates that the President cannot provide a definitive answer. While they mention that they cannot commit to no shutdown scenario, they also state that it is a... | No shutdown scenario for the mid—for the lame duck? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,220 | Clear Non-Reply | Claims ignorance | false |
The President's News Conference | February 14, 2007 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference | 9 | Q. As you know, a growing number of troops are on their second, third, or fourth tour in Iraq. There have been a growing number of reports about declining morale among fighting men. I spoke personally to an infantry commander—tough guy, patriot—who says more and more of the troops are asking, questioning what they're d... | I am—what I hear from commanders is that the place where there is concern is with the family members, that our troops, who have volunteered to serve the country, are willing to go into combat multiple times, but that the concern is with the people on the homefront. And I can understand that. And I—and that's one reason... | The question consists of 5 parts:
1. Awareness: Are you aware of the growing number of troops on multiple tours in Iraq and the reports about declining morale among them?
2. Surprise: Does the increasing number of troops questioning their purpose in Iraq come as a surprise to you?
3. Minority opinion: Is the sentiment... | Question part: 1. Awareness
Verdict: 2.9 Diffusion - Points out that the question is based on false hypotheses and does not provide the requested information.
Explanation: The response does not explicitly address awareness of the reports about declining morale among troops. Instead, it diffuses the question by stating ... | Is the sentiment of questioning the purpose of their presence in Iraq becoming more prevalent among troops? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,318 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference in Bedminster, New Jersey | August 15, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-bedminster-new-jersey-1 | 3 | Q. Are you wanting to do that? Will you participate? | Probably not. No, I think we want to wait until after the election. Look, Iran wants me to lose so badly, because if they do—you know, Iran is a whole different ballgame right now. They haven't been sponsoring terror because they don't have very much money to sponsor terror, and they know we just captured four Iranian ... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Are you wanting to do that?
2. Will you participate?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. Are you wanting to do that?
The response indicates that the President is not interested in doing whatever is being referred to, as he states, "Probably ... | Question part: 1. Are you wanting to do that?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The President's response indicates that he is not interested in doing whatever is being referred to, as he states, "Probably not. No, I think we want to wait until after the election." While he does provide some information on h... | Will you participate? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 518 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | July 15, 2015 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1144 | 5 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. I want to change the subject a bit. Earlier this year, on the flight to Selma, you said, on matters of race, as President, your job is to close the remaining gaps that are left in State and Federal government. Now, how does criminal justice reform fit into that equation? And what gaps remai... | You stuffed a lot in there, April. [] You know what? | The question consists of 4 parts:
Part 1: How does criminal justice reform fit into closing the remaining gaps in State and Federal government on matters of race?
Part 2: What gaps remain towards the end of the President's Presidency?
Part 3: What does it mean for the President to travel to Kenya as President to the ... | Question part: 1 - How does criminal justice reform fit into closing the remaining gaps in State and Federal government on matters of race?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The response does not directly address how criminal justice reform fits into closing the gaps in State and Federal government on matte... | What does it mean for the President to travel to Kenya as President to the United States? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,321 | Clear Non-Reply | Declining to answer | false |
The President's News Conference | September 16, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1262 | 25 | Q. How many? Q. Mr. President, how many people? Q. Was it at the event last night? | A very—from what I heard, a very small number. I think you can probably give the number out later on when you find out what it might be. Yes, it's one person. . One person? | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. How many?
2. Mr. President, how many people?
3. Was it at the event last night?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. How many?
- The President's response indicates that the number is very small.
- He suggests that the exact number can... | Question part: 1. How many?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The President indicates that the number is very small, although he doesn't provide the exact figure.
Question part: 2. Mr. President, how many people?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer... | Mr. President, how many people? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 454 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference With Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan | June 07, 2018 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-prime-minister-shinzo-abe-japan-1 | 1 | Q. Again, Mr. President, would you be willing to go so far as to normalize relations with North Korea? And what about the idea of signing some sort of an agreement on the 12th to end the war? | Well, it could be. We could sign an agreement. As you know, that would be a first step. It's what happens after the agreement that really is the big point.But, yes, we could absolutely sign an agreement. We're looking at it. We're talking about it with them. We're talking about it with a lot of other people. But that c... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Would you be willing to go so far as to normalize relations with North Korea?
2. What about the idea of signing some sort of an agreement on the 12th to end the war?
<--Summary Answer-->
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. Would you be will... | Question part: 1. Would you be willing to go so far as to normalize relations with North Korea?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply - Dodging
Explanation: The response does not directly address or provide any information regarding the willingness to normalize relations with North Korea.
Question part: 2. What about the idea of sign... | What about the idea of signing some sort of an agreement on the 12th to end the war? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,588 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference With President Emmanuel Macron of France in Biarritz, France | August 26, 2019 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-emmanuel-macron-france-biarritz-france | 5 | Q. I don't want to give anything away, but we saw your wife, the First Lady, drink a glass of French wine yesterday. So can you perhaps give up on your threat to put sanctions on French wine? Because if we've understood correctly, you have arrived at an agreement on taxing digital firms. Could you confirm that there ha... | I can confirm that the First Lady loved your French wine, okay? [] All right? She loved your French wine. So thank you very much. That's fine. You go ahead. Thank you. I will wait for the end of this press conference to have the press conference of the Presidency. I will leave that to the floor. Thank you. Thank you. T... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Can you perhaps give up on your threat to put sanctions on French wine?
2. Could you confirm that there has been an agreement between you and France on taxing digital firms?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. The response does not directly ... | Question part: 1. Can you perhaps give up on your threat to put sanctions on French wine?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The response does not directly address whether President Trump will give up on his threat to put sanctions on French wine. Instead, he mentions that the First Lady loved the French win... | Can you perhaps give up on your threat to put sanctions on French wine? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,034 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference in Krün, Germany | June 08, 2015 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-krun-germany | 3 | Q. Thanks, Mr. President. I wanted to ask about two things that were on the agenda at the G-7 this weekend. The first was the Islamic State. You said yesterday, ahead of your meeting with Prime Minister Cameron, that you'd assess what was working and what wasn't. So I'm wondering, bluntly, what is not working in the fi... | Well, on the latter question, I'm not going to hypothesize about not getting it done. I intend to get it done. And, hopefully, we're going to get a vote soon, because I think it's the right thing to do.With respect to ISIL, we have made significant progress in pushing back ISIL from areas in which they had occupied or ... | The question consists of 4 parts:
1) What is not working in the fight against the Islamic State?
2) Does the pledge to step up assistance to Iraq include additional U.S. military personnel?
3) Did the president give Chancellor Merkel or other leaders assurance that fast track authority on trade would go through the Ho... | Question part: 1) What is not working in the fight against the Islamic State?
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit
Explanation: The answer does not explicitly state what is not working in the fight against the Islamic State, but it implies that the speed of training Iraqi forces needs improvement, morale and lack of equipment may be ... | 1) What is not working in the fight against the Islamic State? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,324 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's New Conference | December 19, 2012 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-new-conference | 3 | Q. What is your level of confidence that if you are able to reach a comprehensive deal with the Speaker, that he will be able to bring his members onboard and get it passed? Essentially, do you still trust Speaker Boehner in this process? | There is no doubt that the Speaker has challenges in his caucus, and I recognize that. I'm often reminded when I speak to the Republican leadership that the majority of their caucus's membership come from districts that I lost. All right? And so sometimes, they may not see an incentive in cooperating with me, in part b... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Level of confidence in reaching a comprehensive deal with the Speaker and his ability to bring his members onboard and get it passed.
2. Trust in Speaker Boehner in the process of reaching a comprehensive deal.
The response provides the following information regarding these points:... | Question part: 1. Level of confidence in reaching a comprehensive deal with the Speaker and his ability to bring his members onboard and get it passed.
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The response explicitly addresses the question by acknowledg... | Level of confidence in reaching a comprehensive deal with the Speaker and his ability to bring his members onboard and get it passed. | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 2,249 | Ambivalent | Deflection | false |
The President's News Conference | September 16, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1262 | 11 | Q. So you all had the call. You said that you told him that he had made a mistake. What was his response and did he acknowledge that? | No, I didn't tell him anything. I said, What happened? And I got the impression that he didn't realize he said what he might have said. I didn't see him say it. | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. What was his response?
2. Did he acknowledge that?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. Response: The President did not directly give a response to the question. Instead, the answer states that the President asked "What happened?" implying th... | Question part: 1 - What was his response?
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit - The information requested is given, but without being explicitly stated (not in the requested form)
Explanation: The answer does not explicitly state the response given by the person in question. Instead, it provides indirect information about the Presid... | What was his response? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 433 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | August 01, 2014 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1148 | 1 | Q. Mr. President, like that cease-fire, you've called for diplomatic solutions not only in Israel and Gaza, but also in Ukraine, in Iraq, to very little effect so far. Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world? Have you lost yours? | Yes. Look, this is a common theme that folks bring up. Apparently, people have forgotten that America, as the most powerful country on Earth, still does not control everything around the world. And so our diplomatic efforts often take time. They often will see progress and then a step backwards. That's been true in the... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. "Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world?"
2. "Have you lost yours?"
The response provides the following information regarding the points being asked:
1. "Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world?"
- The response acknowledges that t... | Question part: 1. "Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world?"
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit - The information requested is given, but without being explicitly stated (not in the requested form)
Explanation: The response does not explicitly state whether the United States has lost its influence in the wo... | Have you lost yours? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,068 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference in Davos, Switzerland | January 22, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-davos-switzerland | 8 | Q. So you don't consider a potential traumatic brain injury serious? | They told me about it numerous days later. You'd have to ask Department of Defense. No, I don't consider them very serious injuries, relative to other injuries that I've seen.I've seen what Iran has done with their roadside bombs to our troops. I've seen people with no legs and with no arms. I've seen people that were ... | The question consists of 1 part:
1. Do you consider a potential traumatic brain injury serious?
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
- President Trump deflects the question by saying that the Department of Defense should be asked about the timing of when he was informed.
- He then com... | Question part: 1. Do you consider a potential traumatic brain injury serious?
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The response provides a partial answer by stating that President Trump does not consider potential traumatic brain injuries to be bad injuries. However, it does not directly address whether he con... | Do you consider a potential traumatic brain injury serious? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 983 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | January 19, 2022 | Joseph R. Biden | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1269 | 10 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. I wanted to follow up on your comment on Build Back Better and also ask you a question about the pandemic.You said that you're confident you can pass big chunks of Build Back Better this year. Does that wording mean that you are thinking about—you're looking at breaking the package up into ... | No, look, first of all, on the last part of the question: The Supreme Court decision, I think, was a mistake. But you still see thousands and thousands of people who work for major corporations having to be tested as a consequence of the decision made by the corporation and not by the standard I set that is there. I th... | The question consists of 2 parts:
Part 1: Does that wording mean that you are thinking about—you're looking at breaking the package up into individual portions?
Part 2: Now that the Supreme Court has blocked the vaccination-or-test rule for larger businesses, are you reconsidering whether to require vaccines for domes... | Question part: 1 - Does that wording mean that you are thinking about—you're looking at breaking the package up into individual portions?
Verdict: 2.4 General - The information provided is too general/lacks the requested specificity.
Explanation: The President does not directly address whether they are thinking about b... | Does that wording mean that you are thinking about—you're looking at breaking the package up into individual portions? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 530 | Clear Non-Reply | Clarification | false |
The President's News Conference | February 26, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1266 | 11 | Q. But that's an opinion, right? | No, no. If you read it, you'll see it's beyond an opinion. That's not an opinion. That's something much more than an opinion. They did a bad thing. And there'll be more coming. There'll be more coming. | The question consists of 1 part:
1. Clarification of whether the statement made is an opinion.
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
- The President denies that the statement is an opinion.
- The President claims that if the statement is read, it will be evident that it goes beyond an o... | Question part: 1. Clarification of whether the statement made is an opinion.
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The President directly answers the question by stating, "No, no. If you read it, you'll see it's beyond an opinion. That's not an opin... | Clarification of whether the statement made is an opinion. | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 918 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | August 13, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1255 | 13 | Q. The Prime Minister was pretty clear today at his own press conference that he considers this to be a temporary suspension and that the deal would still be open to him at some point in the future. I'm asking what you think he should do. Should he actually write it off? | No, right now all I can say: It's off the table. So I can't talk about some time into the future; that's a big statement. But right now it's off the table. Is that a correct statement, Mr. Ambassador? Yes. The word suspend was chosen carefully by all the parties. Suspend, by definition—look it up—that means temporary h... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. The Prime Minister's view on the deal being a temporary suspension and open for reconsideration in the future.
2. Opinion on whether the Prime Minister should write off the deal.
The response provides the following information:
1. Regarding the Prime Minister's view, the respons... | Question part 1: The Prime Minister's view on the deal being a temporary suspension and open for reconsideration in the future.
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form).
Explanation: The response confirms the Prime Minister's view by stating that the word "suspend" ... | Opinion on whether the Prime Minister should write off the deal. | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 591 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | July 02, 2008 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1128 | 3 | Q. Thank you, Mr. President. There have been a spate of recent stories about possible military action against Iran before the end of the year, if not by the U.S. then by Israel. And that prompted Iranian officials to say, if they're attacked, they'll essentially shut down the Strait of Hormuz. One, how confident are yo... | I have always said that all options are on the table, but the first option for the United States is to solve this problem diplomatically. I've also make it clear—made it clear that you can't solve a problem diplomatically unless there are other people at the table with you. And that is why we have been pursuing multila... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. How confident are you that Israel will not act independently as the diplomatic process moves forward?
2. What do you make of the mixed messages out of Iran: one of defiance and one of willingness to negotiate?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
... | Question part: 1. How confident are you that Israel will not act independently as the diplomatic process moves forward?
Verdict: 2.4 General - The information provided is too general/lacks the requested specificity.
Explanation: The response does not directly address the confidence level regarding Israel's actions. It ... | What do you make of the mixed messages out of Iran: one of defiance and one of willingness to negotiate? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,821 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | November 08, 2006 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1 | 10 | Q. But the results are being interpreted as a repudiation of your leadership style in some quarters. I wonder what your reaction is to that. And do you—should we expect a very different White House? Should we expect a very different leadership style from you in these last 2 years, given that you have a whole new set of... | You know, I really haven't—I'm still going to try to speak plainly about what I think are the important priorities of the country, and winning this war on terror is, by far, the most important priority. And making sure this economy continues to grow is an important priority. And making sure our children have a good edu... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. "I wonder what your reaction is to that." - Requesting the reaction of the person being addressed to the interpretation of the results as a repudiation.
2. "Should we expect a very different White House?" - Inquiring if a significant change in the White House is to be expected.
3. ... | Question part: 1. "I wonder what your reaction is to that."
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit - The President acknowledges the interpretation of the election results as a repudiation of his leadership style but focuses on his priorities and does not explicitly state his reaction to that interpretation.
Question part: 2. "Should w... | Should we expect a very different White House? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 3,405 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference With President Felipe de Jesus Calderon Hinojosa in Merida | March 14, 2007 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-felipe-de-jesus-calderon-hinojosa-merida | 2 | Q. Thank you. The Attorney General acknowledged yesterday that there were mistakes in the firing of prosecutors. What is his future in your cabinet? Do you have confidence in him? And more importantly—or just as important—how effective can he be in Congress going forward when he's lost a lot of confidence among Democra... | I do have confidence in Attorney General Al Gonzales. I talked to him this morning, and we talked about his need to go up to Capitol Hill and make it very clear to members in both political parties why the Justice Department made the decisions it made, making very clear about the facts. And he's right: Mistakes were ma... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. Attorney General's future in the cabinet
2. Confidence in the Attorney General
3. Effectiveness of the Attorney General in Congress going forward
<--Summary Answer-->
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. Attorney General's future in the cabi... | Question part: 1. Attorney General's future in the cabinet
Verdict: 2.3 Partial/half-answer
Explanation: The answer acknowledges that mistakes were made but does not explicitly address the Attorney General's future in the cabinet. However, it indicates confidence in the Attorney General and discusses his need to go to ... | Attorney General's future in the cabinet | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 3,264 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | October 08, 2013 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1152 | 1 | Q. If that happens, does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like health care and spending and deficit reduction still stand in the intervening weeks if they pass measures that are just perhaps 6 weeks or 2 months long? | Absolutely. I mean, what I've said is that I will talk about anything. What will happen is, we won't agree on everything. I mean, the truth is, is that the parties are pretty divided on a whole big—bunch of big issues right now. Everybody understands that. And by the way, voters are divided on a lot of those issues too... | The question asks:
1. Does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like health care still stand?
2. Does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like spending still stand?
3. Does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like deficit reduction still stand?
4. Will your offer to negotiate still stand even if... | Question part: 1. Does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like health care still stand?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The response explicitly states that the President is willing to work through all the issues, including health care.... | Does your offer to negotiate with them on issues like spending still stand? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,160 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference With Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany in Berlin, Germany | November 17, 2016 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-chancellor-angela-merkel-germany-berlin-germany | 3 | Q. Thank you very much, Mr. President. You've spoken a great deal about what you've characterized as kind of a crude form of nationalism, perhaps, on the rise. I'm wondering if you would advise some of those protestors at home to stop demonstrating against some of the charged rhetoric that has been used by Donald Trump... | One of the great things about our democracy is, it expresses itself in all sorts of ways, and that includes people protesting. I've been the subject of protests during the course of my 8 years, and I suspect that there's not a President in our history that, at some point, hasn't been subject to these protests. So I wou... | The question consists of 4 parts:
1. Advice for protestors against Trump's rhetoric
2. Advice for successor's staff picks
3. Leverage to stop Assad and Putin in Aleppo
4. Perception problem for Americans
The response provides the following information regarding these points:
1. Advice for protestors against Trump's rh... | Question part: 1. Advice for protestors against Trump's rhetoric
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: President Obama advises against telling protestors to be silent and encourages them to express their concerns and participate in democracy.
Questi... | Leverage to stop Assad and Putin in Aleppo | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 1,788 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | July 22, 2009 | Barack Obama | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1121 | 3 | Q. And a subsidiary question, what do you think about taking it out of the political realm and giving it to an outside body of experts to take the politics out of Medicare? | Well, on the second point, that's exactly what our proposal is. It—called the MedPAC program. By the way, it was originally a Republican idea. I want to give credit where credit is due. The Republican Congress passed a bill that created a panel of health care experts to make recommendations to Congress on how we could ... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1. Subsidiary question on taking Medicare out of the political realm: What do you think about taking it out of the political realm?
2. Subsidiary question on giving Medicare to an outside body of experts: What do you think about giving it to an outside body of experts to take the poli... | Question part: 1. Subsidiary question on taking Medicare out of the political realm
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The response explicitly explains the proposal called the MedPAC program as a way to take Medicare out of the political realm. It... | Subsidiary question on taking Medicare out of the political realm: What do you think about taking it out of the political realm? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,631 | Ambivalent | Implicit | false |
The President's News Conference | August 05, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1250 | 4 | Q. Are you aware of or have you encouraged anyone in the party to help him get on the ballot, including in swing States? | No, not at all. No, not at all, other than I get along with him very well. I like him. I like his wife. His wife recommended certain people, as you know, for—including Alice Johnson, who's a fantastic woman. But his wife recommended certain people to get out of prison. They were in prison for a long time—a long, long t... | The question consists of 1 part:
1. Are you aware of or have you encouraged anyone in the party to help him get on the ballot, including in swing States?
The response provides the following information regarding this point:
1. The President states that he is not aware of or has not encouraged anyone in the party to... | Question part: 1. Are you aware of or have you encouraged anyone in the party to help him get on the ballot, including in swing States?
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit - The information requested is explicitly stated (in the requested form)
Explanation: The response explicitly states that the President is not aware of or has not... | Are you aware of or have you encouraged anyone in the party to help him get on the ballot, including in swing States? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 686 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference | September 07, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1260 | 15 | Q. Can I ask a question on the vaccine? | And I just want to again wish you a happy Labor Day.Thank you very much, everybody. | The question consists of 1 part:
1. Can I ask a question on the vaccine?
The response does not provide any information regarding the question asked. Instead, the President acknowledges the Labor Day holiday and thanks everyone. | Question part: 1. Can I ask a question on the vaccine?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply - Dodging
Explanation: The response does not address the question at all. Instead, the President acknowledges the Labor Day holiday and expresses gratitude. | Can I ask a question on the vaccine? | 85 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 481 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
The President's News Conference | September 04, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1259 | 2 | Q. Thanks, Mr. President. Germany has said that Alexei Navalny, the Russian opposition leader, was poisoned. What do you think should be done to Russia about that? And what is your message to Russia about that? And how should the international community and the United States respond? | Well, I think we have to look at it very seriously if that's the case, and I think we will. There's nobody been tougher on Russia than I have. We get along. I get along with almost all countries.I get along with North Korea. Remember? We were supposed to be going to war with North Korea. If Hillary got elected, you'd b... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. What do you think should be done to Russia about the poisoning of Alexei Navalny?
2. What is your message to Russia about the poisoning?
3. How should the international community and the United States respond?
The response provides the following information regarding these points:... | Question part: 1. What do you think should be done to Russia about the poisoning of Alexei Navalny?
Verdict: 2.4 General - The information provided is too general/lacks the requested specificity.
Explanation: The response does not provide a specific answer to what should be done to Russia about the poisoning of Alexei ... | What do you think should be done to Russia about the poisoning of Alexei Navalny? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 551 | Clear Non-Reply | Claims ignorance | false |
The President's News Conference | July 15, 2008 | George W. Bush | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1127 | 1 | Q. Mr. President, are America's banks in trouble? And does the rescue of Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac make more bailouts inevitable by sending the message that there are some institutions that are too big to fail and that it's okay to take risks? | First, let me talk about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A lot of people in the country probably don't understand how important they are to the mortgage markets. And it's really important for people to have confidence in the mortgage markets and that there be stability in the mortgage markets. And that's why Secretary Paul... | The question consists of 2 parts:
1) Are America's banks in trouble?
2) Does the rescue of Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac make more bailouts inevitable by sending the message that there are some institutions that are too big to fail and that it's okay to take risks?
The response provides the following information regardin... | Question part: 1) Are America's banks in trouble?
Verdict: 1.2 Implicit - The information about the condition of America's banks is given implicitly through the explanation about deposit insurance and the need for depositors to have confidence in the banking system.
Question part: 2) Does the rescue of Freddie Mae and... | Does the rescue of Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac make more bailouts inevitable by sending the message that there are some institutions that are too big to fail and that it's okay to take risks? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 2,779 | Ambivalent | Deflection | false |
The President's News Conference | August 10, 2020 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1252 | 28 | Q. ——venue for your speech for the RNC nomination acceptance. What's your thinking behind that as a possible location? | Well, I think it's—I've been to Gettysburg numerous times. It's a national park; it's a national historic site. It's incredible. You know, it's the history. It's incredible, actually, to me. It was a very important place, and is a very important place in our country.So we're looking at that, and we're looking at the Wh... | The question consists of 2 parts:
Part 1: The thinking behind considering Gettysburg as a possible venue for the RNC nomination acceptance.
Part 2: The thinking behind considering the White House as a possible venue for the RNC nomination acceptance.
The response provides the following information regarding these poi... | Question part 1: Gettysburg as a possible venue for the RNC nomination acceptance
Verdict: 1.1 Explicit
Explanation: The President explicitly provides information about their thinking behind considering Gettysburg as a possible venue, mentioning that they have been there numerous times and highlighting its significance... | The thinking behind considering the White House as a possible venue for the RNC nomination acceptance. | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | true | 654 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference With President Emmanuel Macron of France in Biarritz, France | August 26, 2019 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-emmanuel-macron-france-biarritz-france | 13 | Q. Why do you think it's appropriate to invite Russia to the G-7, given that they've meddled in the 2016 election? And are you worried that if Russia does come to the G-7, that it might hurt you politically, because it's only going to be a couple months before the 2020 election? | I don't care politically. I really don't. A lot of people don't understand this. I ran one election, and I won. It happened to be for President. I don't care politically. I'm going to run another election. I think I'm winning based on polls that we see. Whether I win or not, I have to do the right thing.So I don't do t... | The question consists of 2 parts:
Part 1: Why do you think it's appropriate to invite Russia to the G-7, given that they've meddled in the 2016 election?
Part 2: Are you worried that if Russia does come to the G-7, that it might hurt you politically, because it's only going to be a couple months before the 2020 electi... | Question part 1: Why do you think it's appropriate to invite Russia to the G-7, given that they've meddled in the 2016 election?
Verdict: 2.2 Deflection - Starts on topic but shifts the focus and makes a different point than what is asked
Explanation: President Trump does not directly address why he thinks it's approp... | Are you worried that if Russia does come to the G-7, that it might hurt you politically, because it's only going to be a couple months before the 2020 election? | 86 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,044 | Clear Reply | Explicit | false |
The President's News Conference With President Jair Messias Bolsonaro of Brazil | March 19, 2019 | Donald J. Trump | https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-with-president-jair-messias-bolsonaro-brazil | 7 | Q. President Bolsonaro, does the United States expect the influence of China into Brazil? Yesterday Paulo Guedes mentioned that it's going to incentivize relations with China. How does the U.S. see that, and what you said about President Trump, about the Chinese in Brazil? | Well, like I said, Brazil is going to keep on making as much business with as many countries as possible. No longer businesses are going to be found into the ideology, as it used to be. We are also following this objective for the good of our peoples. . Thank you very much, Mr. President. I appreciate it. Thank you ver... | The question consists of 3 parts:
1. Does the United States expect the influence of China into Brazil?
2. How does the U.S. see Brazil's intention to incentivize relations with China?
3. What did President Trump say about China's presence in Brazil?
The response provides the following information regarding these poin... | Question part: 1. Does the United States expect the influence of China into Brazil?
Verdict: 2. Non-reply (Dodging)
Explanation: The response from President Bolsonaro does not provide any explicit or implicit information regarding whether the United States expects the influence of China into Brazil.
Question part: 2. ... | What did President Trump say about China's presence in Brazil? | 89 | null | null | null | false | false | false | 1,190 | Ambivalent | Dodging | false |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 7