File size: 6,106 Bytes
f96a219
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Robot Execution Failures 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<HTML> <HEAD>
<TITLE> Robot Execution Failures </TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Title 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H1> Robot Execution Failures </H1>


<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Data Type 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2>Data Type</H2>
multivariate time series

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Abstract 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2>Abstract</H2>
<p>
This dataset contains force and torque measurements on a robot after failure detection. Each failure is characterized by 15 force/torque samples collected at regular time intervals starting immediately after failure detection.
</p>

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Sources
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2> Sources</H2>
<H4> Original Owner and Donor</H4>
<PRE>
Luis Seabra Lopes and Luis M. Camarinha-Matos
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 
Monte da Caparica, Portugal
</PRE>
<B>Date Donated: </B> April 23, 1999 

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Data Characteristics 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2> Data Characteristics</H2>

The donation includes 5 datasets, each of them defining a different learning problem:
<UL>
<li> LP1: failures in approach to grasp position </li>
<li> LP2: failures in transfer of a part </li>
<li> LP3: position of part after a transfer failure </li>
<li> LP4: failures in approach to ungrasp position </li>
<li> LP5: failures in motion with part </li>
</UL>

<H4>Feature information </H4>
<P>
All features are numeric although they are integer valued only.
Each feature represents a force or a torque measured after
failure detection; each failure instance is characterized in terms
of 15 force/torque samples collected at regular time intervals
starting immediately after failure detection; 
The total observation window for each failure instance was of 315 ms.
</P>

Each example is described as follows:
<PRE>
                 class
                 Fx1	Fy1	Fz1	Tx1	Ty1	Tz1
                 Fx2	Fy2	Fz2	Tx2	Ty2	Tz2
                 ......
                 Fx15	Fy15	Fz15	Tx15	Ty15	Tz15
</PRE>
<P>
where Fx1 ... Fx15 is the evolution of force Fx in the observation
window, the same for Fy, Fz and the torques; there is a total 
of 90 features.
</P>
<H4> Number of instances in each dataset</H4>
<PRE>
   -- LP1: 88
   -- LP2: 47
   -- LP3: 47
   -- LP4: 117
   -- LP5: 164
</PRE>


<H4>Class Distribution</H4>
<PRE>
   -- LP1: 24% normal
           19% collision    
           18% front collision
           39% obstruction
   -- LP2: 43% normal
           13% front collision
           15% back collision
           11% collision to the right
           19% collision to the left
   -- LP3: 43% ok
           19% slightly moved
           32% moved
            6% lost
   -- LP4: 21% normal
           62% collision
           18% obstruction
   -- LP5: 27% normal
           16% bottom collision
           13% bottom obstruction
           29% collision in part
           16% collision in tool
</PRE>

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Other Relevant Information 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2> Other Relevant Information</H2>

<H4>Feature transformation strategies</H4>

In order to improve classification accuracy, a set of five feature
transformation strategies (based on statistical summary features,
discrete Fourier transform, etc.) was defined and evaluated.
This enabled an average improvement of 20% in accuracy. The most 
accessible reference is [Seabra Lopes and Camarinha-Matos, 1998].


<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Data Format 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2>Data Format</H2>
The data is stored in five ASCII files, with each example in the files described as follows:
<PRE>
                 class
                 Fx1    Fy1 Fz1 Tx1 Ty1 Tz1
                 Fx2    Fy2 Fz2 Tx2 Ty2 Tz2
                 ......
                 Fx15   Fy15    Fz15    Tx15    Ty15    Tz15
</PRE>
where Fx1 ... Fx15 is the evolution of force Fx in the observation
window, the same for Fy, Fz and the torques; there is a total
of 90 features.

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Past Usage 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<H2>Past Usage</H2>
<p>
Seabra Lopes, L. (1997) "Robot Learning at the Task Level:
a Study in the Assembly Domain", Ph.D. thesis, Universidade
Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
</p>

<p>
Seabra Lopes, L. and L.M. Camarinha-Matos (1998) Feature 
Transformation Strategies for a Robot Learning Problem, 
"Feature Extraction, Construction and Selection. A Data Mining 
Perspective", H. Liu and H. Motoda (edrs.), 
Kluwer Academic Publishers. 
</p>

<p>
Camarinha-Matos, L.M., L. Seabra Lopes, and J. Barata (1996) 
Integration and Learning in Supervision of Flexible Assembly Systems, 
"IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation", 12 (2), 202-219. 
</p>

<!------------------------------------------------------------------------
<!  Signature 
<!----------------------------------------------------------------------->
<p>
<hr>
<ADDRESS>
<A href="http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/">The UCI KDD Archive</A><br>
<a href="http://www.ics.uci.edu/">Information and Computer Science</a><br>
<a href="http://www.uci.edu/">University of California, Irvine</a><br>
Irvine, CA 92697-3425 <br>
</ADDRESS> 
Last modified: March 11, 1999 </BODY>
</HTML>