Datasets:
title
stringlengths 18
380
| petitioner
stringlengths 0
173
| respondent
stringlengths 0
199
| description
stringclasses 634
values | judge
stringlengths 0
150
| author_judge
stringclasses 0
values | citation
stringlengths 17
27
| case_id
stringlengths 0
14
| cnr
stringlengths 16
16
| decision_date
stringdate 1950-03-14 00:00:00
2025-12-12 00:00:00
| disposal_nature
stringclasses 32
values | court
stringclasses 1
value | available_languages
stringclasses 488
values | raw_html
stringlengths 1.52k
6.22k
| path
stringlengths 10
20
| nc_display
stringlengths 0
12
| scraped_at
stringdate 2025-06-12 20:42:23
2026-01-09 10:35:45
| year
stringdate 1950-01-01 00:00:00
2025-01-01 00:00:00
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO versus KANDOKOLU CHELLA Y AMMA ALIAS MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER
|
SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO
|
KANDOKOLU CHELLA Y AMMA ALIAS MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER
|
BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 806
|
1950 INSC 25
|
ESCR010000301950
|
17-10-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language0' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('0','1950_1_806_821','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_0' aria-label=" SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO versus KANDOKOlU CHELLA Y AMMA alias MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_806_821','1950INSC25'); ><font size='4'> <strong>SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>KANDOKOLU CHELLA Y AMMA ALIAS MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 806</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 25</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000301950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> 806 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] SRI RANGA NILAYAM RAMA KRISHNA RAO v. KANDOKOlU CHELLA Y AMMA alias MANGAMMA AND ANOTHER [SAIYID FAZL Au, MUKHERJEA and (HANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.] Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act (IV of 1935), ss. 3 (D), 8, 10, 19-Sale of estate in execution of decree-Whether relief-Legality-0.P.G. (1908), O.XXI, r. 90-Execution .ale-Appeal against order refusing to set aside sale-When 8"le becomes absolute and title passes­ Receiver-Appointment of receiver, effect of. In execution of a, decree .obtained on a mortgage a village owned by the mortgagor<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 17-10-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 56/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('0','1950','1950_1_806_821','1950INSC25');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_806_821','1950INSC25','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_806_821
|
1950INSC25
|
2025-06-12T21:11:33.644571
|
1950
|
|
DR. N. B. KHARE versus THE STATE OF DELHI
|
DR. N. B. KHARE
|
THE STATE OF DELHI
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 519
|
1950 INSC 17
|
ESCR010000101950
|
26-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language4' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('4','1950_1_519_536','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_4' aria-label=" DR. N. B. KHARE versus THE STATE OF DELHI pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_519_536','1950INSC17'); ><font size='4'> <strong>DR. N. B. KHARE<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE OF DELHI </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 519</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 17</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000101950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 519 Even assuming for argument's sake that we have got jurisdiction under article 136, the exercise of which would ,depend upon the circumstances of each case, in view of the reasons which we have set out above, this is not · an appeal which, in our opinion, should be<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 37/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('4','1950','1950_1_519_536','1950INSC17');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_519_536','1950INSC17','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_519_536
|
1950INSC17
|
2025-06-12T21:11:48.635627
|
1950
|
|
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY versus SUPERINTENDENT OF STAMPS AND MAHARASHTRA SUGAR MILLS LTD.
|
CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY
|
SUPERINTENDENT OF STAMPS AND MAHARASHTRA SUGAR MILLS LTD.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 536
|
1950 INSC 20
|
ESCR010000111950
|
27-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,MAR
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language0' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('0','1950_1_536_547','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_0' aria-label=" CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY versus SUPERINTENDENT OF STAMPS AND MAHARASHTRA SUGAR MILLS LTD. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_536_547','1950INSC20'); ><font size='4'> <strong>CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>SUPERINTENDENT OF STAMPS AND MAHARASHTRA SUGAR MILLS LTD. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 536</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 20</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000111950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> Khare v. The Stale of Delhi Mukhnjea]. 1950 536 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [19501 force, and consequently the order made by the District Magistrate in the present case cannot stand. I would, therefore, allow the application and quash the externment order that has been passed against the petitioner. SUGAR MILLS LTD. [SHR1 HARILAL KANg C. J., SAIYID FAzL Au, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN and MUKHERJEA J J.) Indian Stamp Act (II of 1899), ss. 57, 59 (2)-Reference lo High Court-Nature of power .to refer-Duty to refer on reque.11 of party affected-Order directing Chief Controlling<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 27-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 12/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('0','1950','1950_1_536_547','1950INSC20');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_536_547','1950INSC20','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_536_547
|
1950INSC20
|
2025-06-12T21:11:33.668504
|
1950
|
|
BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD. versus GOURISHANKARSHARMA
|
BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD.
|
GOURISHANKARSHARMA
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 25
|
1950 INSC 2
|
ESCR010000031950
|
14-03-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,GUJ,HIN,MAL,MAR,NEP,ORI,PUN,TEL
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language3' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('3','1950_1_25_29','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='NEP'> नेपाली - Nepali</option><option value='ORI'>ଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odia</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_3' aria-label=" BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD. versus GOURISHANKARSHARMA pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_25_29','1950INSC2'); ><font size='4'> <strong>BHAWANIPORE BANKING CORPORATION, LTD. <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>GOURISHANKARSHARMA </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 25</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 2</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000031950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> SUPREME COUR1' REPORTS 25 the octroi duty under the Municipal Act continues to be valid. On this point again the appellant's argu­ ment is that the levy of a duty at any stage of the manufacture of bidis out of tobacco would be the levy of the excise duty and therefore those provisions were imposts arising from two different sets of circumstances were not per­ mitted in law. In our opinion, therefore, there is nothing in the Excise Act to make its provisions contrary to the provisions of Section 66 (1) (e) of the Central Pro­ vinces Municipalities Act or to the levy<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 14-03-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 51/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('3','1950','1950_1_25_29','1950INSC2');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_25_29','1950INSC2','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_25_29
|
1950INSC2
|
2025-06-12T21:11:39.786630
|
1950
|
|
BRIJ BHUSHAN AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF DELHI.
|
BRIJ BHUSHAN AND ANOTHER
|
THE STATE OF DELHI.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 605
|
1950 INSC 15
|
ESCR010000181950
|
26-05-1950
|
Case Allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language1' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('1','1950_1_605_620','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1' aria-label=" BRIJ BHUSHAN AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF DELHI. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_605_620','1950INSC15'); ><font size='4'> <strong>BRIJ BHUSHAN AND ANOTHER<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE OF DELHI. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 605</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 15</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000181950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS 605 undermine the security of the State, but to this line of argument there is a two-fold answer :- ( 1) The Act, as its preamble shows, is not intended for petty disorders but for disorders involving menace to the peace and tranquillity of the Province, (2) There arc be -a matter which undermines the securitv of the State, but that would not affect the law whi~h aims at checking sedition. It was also said that the law as it stands may be mis­ used by the State executive, but misuse of the law is one thing and its being unconstitutional is another. We are<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 29/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Case Allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('1','1950','1950_1_605_620','1950INSC15');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_605_620','1950INSC15','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_605_620
|
1950INSC15
|
2025-06-12T21:11:35.966025
|
1950
|
|
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF DEBTS versus NANDLAL
|
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF DEBTS
|
NANDLAL
|
MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 741
|
1950 INSC 23
|
ESCR010000211950
|
12-10-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,GUJ,HIN,KAN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language4' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('4','1950_1_741_747','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_4' aria-label=" CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF DEBTS versus NANDLAL pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_741_747','1950INSC23'); ><font size='4'> <strong>CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY OF DEBTS <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>NANDLAL </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 741</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 23</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000211950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, RAMCHANDER NAIK</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS 741 I, therefore, agree with my Lord the Chief Justice that this appeal should be allowed and the judgments and orders of the Courts below should be set aside and the petition should stand dismissed. I also agree to the order for costs made by my Lord the Chief Justice. OF DEBTS v. NANDLAL [MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN and R. s. NAIK JJ.J Co-operative Cr<dit Societies Act, 1340 ]!'., (Hyderabwi), s. 42 --Award-Remission by Registrar to Civil Court for execution­ Poicers of Registrar-Instal1nent decree-Defa'U,lt-Exer:tltion pro· ceedinas for whole amount in<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 12-10-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 374/1946</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 2 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('4','1950','1950_1_741_747','1950INSC23');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_741_747','1950INSC23','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_741_747
|
1950INSC23
|
2025-06-12T21:11:49.482683
|
1950
|
|
MOHINDER SINGH versus THE STATE
|
MOHINDER SINGH
|
THE STATE
|
BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 821
|
1950 INSC 26
|
ESCR010000311950
|
17-10-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language1' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('1','1950_1_821_833','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1' aria-label=" MOHINDER SINGH versus THE STATE pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_821_833','1950INSC26'); ><font size='4'> <strong>MOHINDER SINGH<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 821</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 26</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000311950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS 821 saleable interest or interest as a tenant, ryot or under- 1950 tenure holder. S.ri Rt'lnga I agree in the conclusion reached by my learned N.tayam Rama brother. Kdshna Rao Appeals allowed. Agent for the appellant: M .S. Krishnamoorthi Sastri. Agent for the respondents: of c.rpert evidence-Duty to prove whufe case-Evidence 1v.1.ntin'/ o,i mrttPrial point-Inipropriety of contJirtion-Proof of :ilibi-St,inilnrd of proof-S'llpreme Co~trt­ Criminal appea,l-Interfcrcn::e-Practicp_. In :t case where death is due to injuries or<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 17-10-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 10/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('1','1950','1950_1_821_833','1950INSC26');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_821_833','1950INSC26','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_821_833
|
1950INSC26
|
2025-06-12T21:11:35.885848
|
1950
|
|
NARHARI AND OTHERS versus SHANKAR AND OTHERS
|
NARHARI AND OTHERS
|
SHANKAR AND OTHERS
|
MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 754
|
1950 INSC 24
|
ESCR010000231950
|
13-10-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,BEN,HIN,MAL,MAR,NEP,ORI,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language2' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('2','1950_1_754_758','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='BEN'>বাংলা - Bengali</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='NEP'> नेपाली - Nepali</option><option value='ORI'>ଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odia</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2' aria-label=" NARHARI AND OTHERS versus SHANKAR AND OTHERS pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_754_758','1950INSC24'); ><font size='4'> <strong>NARHARI AND OTHERS <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>SHANKAR AND OTHERS </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 754</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 24</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000231950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, RAMCHANDER NAIK, KHALEELUZZAMAN SIDDIQI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS [ 1950] \950 of authority is against the proposition that a widow as an unsecured creditor has any priority over the K•P 0 " Chand other unsecured creditors of her husband. In our v. K".d"' u""'"' opinion, the above mentioned two Allahabad according to the principles of Muhammadan Law in the estate of a deceased Muslim being rateably distributed between the unsecured creditors. For the reasons given above we hold that the objection raised by the widow had no substance in it and the executing court should have directed the<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 13-10-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 22/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('2','1950','1950_1_754_758','1950INSC24');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_754_758','1950INSC24','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_754_758
|
1950INSC24
|
2025-06-12T21:11:37.238353
|
1950
|
|
KAPORE CHAND versus KADAR UNNISA BEGUM AND OTHERS
|
KAPORE CHAND
|
KADAR UNNISA BEGUM AND OTHERS
|
MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 747
|
1950 INSC 22
|
ESCR010000221950
|
12-10-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,GUJ,HIN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language3' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('3','1950_1_747_754','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_3' aria-label=" KAPORE CHAND versus KADAR UNNISA BEGUM AND OTHERS pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_747_754','1950INSC22'); ><font size='4'> <strong>KAPORE CHAND <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>KADAR UNNISA BEGUM AND OTHERS </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 747</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 22</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000221950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, RAMCHANDER NAIK, KHALEELUZZAMAN SIDDIQI</strong><br> S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 747 that the Registrar can stay the proceedings. It seems 1950 to us that the act of the Registrar in asking the civil . t t t . d' d' b f . Co-opB'atwe cour to s ay execu 10n procee ings pen mg e ore it Soci•tY of n, bts is a clear encroachment on the powers cure a defect that might be said to exist in the original certificate because of its having been sent by the Madadgar N azim, it is unnecessary to consider the contention of the learned counsel that there was no proper certificate in this case and the proceed- ings in execution therefore were<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 12-10-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 189/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('3','1950','1950_1_747_754','1950INSC22');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_747_754','1950INSC22','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_747_754
|
1950INSC22
|
2025-06-12T21:11:45.280033
|
1950
|
|
RAM KRISHNA RAMNATH AGARWAL OF KAMPTEE versus SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KAMP TEE.
|
RAM KRISHNA RAMNATH AGARWAL OF KAMPTEE
|
SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KAMP TEE.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SIR SYED FAZL ALI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 15
|
1950 INSC 1
|
ESCR010000021950
|
14-03-1950
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language1' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('1','1950_1_15_25','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_1' aria-label=" RAM KRISHNA RAMNATH AGARWAL OF KAMPTEE versus SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KAMP TEE. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_15_25','1950INSC1'); ><font size='4'> <strong>RAM KRISHNA RAMNATH AGARWAL OF KAMPTEE <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KAMP TEE. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 15</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 1</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000021950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS RAM KRISHNA RAMNATH AGARWAL OF KAMPTEE v. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, KAMP TEE. UNION OF INDIA AND GOVERNMENT OF 15 ~. MAD HY A PRADESH : INTERVENERS. , [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA, and S.R. DAS JJ.] Govl!rnment of of 1922), s. 66 (1) (e)-I mport of tobacco within municipality for manu· faoturing bidis-Tobaoco liable to Central excise duty-Levy of ootroi duty by municipality-Legality. Section 66 (1) (e) of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act, 1922, empowered municipalities within the Province to<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 14-03-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 3/1948</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('1','1950','1950_1_15_25','1950INSC1');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('1','1950','1950_1_15_25','1950INSC1','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_15_25
|
1950INSC1
|
2025-06-12T21:11:35.224479
|
1950
|
||
MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY versus SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH
|
MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY
|
SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 64
|
1950 INSC 4
|
ESCR010000201950
|
14-03-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language4' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('4','1950_1_64_74','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_4' aria-label=" MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY versus SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_64_74','1950INSC4'); ><font size='4'> <strong>MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 64</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 4</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000201950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REpORTS (1950] MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY v. SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH (SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID F AZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA and S. R. DAS JJ.] Bombay Cotton Contracts Act (IV of 1982). s. 8(1)-East India Cotlt!n Association Bye-laws, whether void. Section 8 of the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932, provided that contracts entered into after the date of the commencement of the Act which are not in accordance with the bye-laws of any recognised cotton association shall be void. Bye-law 80 of the East India Cotton Association,<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 14-03-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 26/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('4','1950','1950_1_64_74','1950INSC4');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('4','1950','1950_1_64_74','1950INSC4','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_64_74
|
1950INSC4
|
2025-06-12T21:11:45.607312
|
1950
|
|
ROMESH THAPPAR versus THE STATE OF MADRAS
|
ROMESH THAPPAR
|
THE STATE OF MADRAS
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 594
|
1950 INSC 14
|
ESCR010000171950
|
26-05-1950
|
Case Allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,NEP,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language2' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('2','1950_1_594_605','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='NEP'> नेपाली - Nepali</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2' aria-label=" ROMESH THAPPAR versus THE STATE OF MADRAS pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_594_605','1950INSC14'); ><font size='4'> <strong>ROMESH THAPPAR<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE OF MADRAS </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 594</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 14</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000171950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> 594 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ROMESH THAPPAR I/. THE STATE OF MADRAS [SHR1 HAR1LAL KANIA C. J., SA1Y1D FAZL Au, PATANJALI ~ASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJEA and DAs JJ.] [1950} Constitution of India, Art. 19, els. {I) (a) and (2), 32-Appli­ cation under Art. 32-Preliminary ob1ection-Fundamental Order Act tXXXIll of 1949), s. 9 ( 1-A)-Validity. Held, by the Full Court (i) (overruling o preliminary objections) -TJnder the Constitution the Supreme Court is constituted the protector and guarantor of fundamental rights, and it cannot, con· sistently with the responsibility so laid<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT TO PETITION (CIVIL)... No. 16/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Case Allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('2','1950','1950_1_594_605','1950INSC14');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_594_605','1950INSC14','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_594_605
|
1950INSC14
|
2025-06-12T21:11:38.007042
|
1950
|
|
ABDULLA AHMED versus ANIMENDRA KISSEN MITTER
|
ABDULLA AHMED
|
ANIMENDRA KISSEN MITTER
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 30
|
1950 INSC 3
|
ESCR010000041950
|
14-03-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language2' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('2','1950_1_30_63','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_2' aria-label=" ABDULLA AHMED versus ANIMENDRA KISSEN MITTER pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_30_63','1950INSC3'); ><font size='4'> <strong>ABDULLA AHMED <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>ANIMENDRA KISSEN MITTER </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 30</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 3</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000041950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> li. 30 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ABDULLA AHMED v. ANIMENDRA KISSEN MITTER. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA c . .1., SAIYID F AZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN and S. R. DAS JJ.) Oontmct-.{gencu-Estate b1"0ker-Authorit11 to ' 11tgotiate a sale' and '3ecure purcha.se1· '-Whether empower& price-Broker'1 right to commission-Powers of e&late agents. The appellant, •u estate broker, was employed by the respondent by a letter .dated 5th May, 1943, to negotiate a· sale of a certain property on the terms mentioned_ in a commission note which ran as follows: "J<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 14-03-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 44/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('2','1950','1950_1_30_63','1950INSC3');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('2','1950','1950_1_30_63','1950INSC3','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_30_63
|
1950INSC3
|
2025-06-12T21:11:37.249541
|
1950
|
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. versus GAPPUMAL KANHALYA LAL
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P.
|
GAPPUMAL KANHALYA LAL
|
M. PATANJALI SASTRI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 563
|
1950 INSC 19
|
ESCR010000141950
|
26-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,BEN,GUJ,HIN,KAN,MAL,MAR,ORI,PUN,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language5' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('5','1950_1_563_565','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='BEN'>বাংলা - Bengali</option><option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='ORI'>ଓଡ଼ିଆ - Odia</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_5' aria-label=" COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. versus GAPPUMAL KANHAlYA LAL pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('5','1950','1950_1_563_565','1950INSC19'); ><font size='4'> <strong>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>GAPPUMAL KANHALYA LAL </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 563</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 19</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000141950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 563 in Gappumal Kanhaiya Lal v. Commissioner of Jncome­ tax ( 1 ) (the connected appeal took a correct view of this matter and the reasoning given therein has our approval. The result is that this appeal is allowed and the two questions which were referred to the High Court by . Agent for the· respondent : P. A. Mehta. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. v. GAPPUMAL KANHAlYA LAL [SAIYID FAzL Au, PATANJALI SAsTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN ;nd MuKHERJEA JJ.] Indian Income-tax (XI of 1922), s. 9 (1) (iv)-lncome from p1"Dperty-Computation of annual value-Deduction of<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 6/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 4 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('5','1950','1950_1_563_565','1950INSC19');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('5','1950','1950_1_563_565','1950INSC19','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_563_565
|
1950INSC19
|
2025-06-12T21:11:50.784875
|
1950
|
|
THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI versus EMPLOYEES OF THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI
|
THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI
|
EMPLOYEES OF THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 459
|
1950 INSC 16
|
ESCR010000091950
|
26-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language3' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('3','1950_1_459_519','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_3' aria-label=" THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI versus EMPLOYEES OF THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_459_519','1950INSC16'); ><font size='4'> <strong>THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>EMPLOYEES OF THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 459</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 16</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000091950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup></strong><br> COURT REPORTS 459 a sound basis for invoking the discretion of this Court in granting special leave. Generally speaking, this Court will not grant special leave, unless it is shown that exceptional and special circumstances exist, that substantial and grave injustice has been done and that the interfere w.ith the decision of the High Court, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Agent for the appellant: S. P. Varma. Agent for the respondent: P, A. Mehta. THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI v. EMPLOYEES OF THE BHARAT BANK LTD., DELHI and THE BHARAT BANK EMPLOYEES' UNION, DELHI<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 34/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('3','1950','1950_1_459_519','1950INSC16');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('3','1950','1950_1_459_519','1950INSC16','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_459_519
|
1950INSC16
|
2025-06-12T21:11:41.047885
|
1950
|
|
SHETH MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI versus MESSRS. HORMUSJI JAMSHEDJI GINWALLA AND SONS.
|
SHETH MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI
|
MESSRS. HORMUSJI JAMSHEDJI GINWALLA AND SONS.
|
MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 75
|
1950 INSC 5
|
ESCR010000251950
|
21-03-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language0' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('0','1950_1_75_87','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_0' aria-label=" SHETH MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI versus MESSRS. HORMUSJI JAMSHEDJI GINWALLA AND SONS. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_75_87','1950INSC5'); ><font size='4'> <strong>SHETH MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>MESSRS. HORMUSJI JAMSHEDJI GINWALLA AND SONS. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 75</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 5</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000251950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 75 SHETH MANEKLAL MANSUKHBHAI v. MESSRS. HORMUSJI JAMSHEDJI GINWALLA AND SONS. [SAIYID F AZL ALI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN and MUKHERJEA JJ.] Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), s. 58-A-Agreement to lease evidenced by co1·respondence-Lessee put in possession-Accep­ tance of of putti~ up a factory in certain plots of land situated within a Taluqdari estate which was under the management of the Government under the Gujarat, Taluq<lars Act, 1888, applied in writing to the Taluqdari Settlement Officer for a perm1.uent lease of the plots. The Taluqdari Officer<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-03-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 37/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('0','1950','1950_1_75_87','1950INSC5');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('0','1950','1950_1_75_87','1950INSC5','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_75_87
|
1950INSC5
|
2025-06-12T21:11:33.953432
|
1950
|
|
RASHID AHMED versus THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, KAIRANA, THE UNION OF INDIA AND THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
|
RASHID AHMED
|
THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, KAIRANA, THE UNION OF INDIA AND THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 566
|
1950 INSC 12
|
ESCR010000151950
|
19-05-1950
|
Case Allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,ASM,GUJ,HIN,KAN,MAR,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language8' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('8','1950_1_566_572','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='ASM'>অসমীয়া - Assamese</option><option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_8' aria-label=" RASHID AHMED versus THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, KAIRANA, THE UNION OF INDIA and THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('8','1950','1950_1_566_572','1950INSC12'); ><font size='4'> <strong>RASHID AHMED<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, KAIRANA, THE UNION OF INDIA AND THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 566</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 12</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000151950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> 566 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1950 l RASHID AHMED fl. THE MUNICIPAL BOARD, KAIRANA. THE UNION OF INDIA and THE STATE OF UTT AR PRADESH : lNTERVENERS. [SHRt HARILAL KANIA C. J., SAtYm FAzL Au, PATA>iJALI SASTRI MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN MuKHERJEA and DAs J J. J Constitution of India, Arts. 19 (1), 19 (6), permission-Absence of provisions for issuing license to old traders-Provisfons permitting grant of monopoly-Lt:gality of bye/aw. Byelaw No. 2 of the byclaws of a municipal board, which came into force on the 1st January, 1950, provided that 0 no person shall establish any new n1arket or<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 19-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 10/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Case Allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('8','1950','1950_1_566_572','1950INSC12');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('8','1950','1950_1_566_572','1950INSC12','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_566_572
|
1950INSC12
|
2025-06-12T22:10:39.298573
|
1950
|
|
PANNALAL JANKIDAS versus MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER.
|
PANNALAL JANKIDAS
|
MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 979
|
1950 INSC 43
|
ESCR010000411950
|
21-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language7' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('7','1950_1_979_1008','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_7' aria-label=" PANNALAL JANKIDAS versus MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('7','1950','1950_1_979_1008','1950INSC43'); ><font size='4'> <strong>PANNALAL JANKIDAS <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>MOHANLAL AND ANOTHER. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 979</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 43</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000411950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SUDHI RANJAN DAS</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS 979 say that an apportionment under section 26 (2) would be meaningless, though, if the testator's estate was sufficiently solvent, it would have no practical significance. DAS J.-I agree with the Chief Justice. Appeal dismissed. Agent for the appellant: R. S. Narula. ta inwre goads against fire-Goads destroyed by explosian-Liabi· lity al agent-Bombay Explosion (Compensation) Ordinance, 1944, ss. 14, 18-0rdinance granting compensation for damage by explo­ sion-Loss by explosioii not covered by policy-Loss of compensation undu Ordinance by failure<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 71/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('7','1950','1950_1_979_1008','1950INSC43');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('7','1950','1950_1_979_1008','1950INSC43','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_979_1008
|
1950INSC43
|
2025-06-12T22:10:55.483390
|
1950
|
|
THE NEW PIECEGOODS BAZAR CO., LTD., BOMBAY versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
|
THE NEW PIECEGOODS BAZAR CO., LTD., BOMBAY
|
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
|
M. PATANJALI SASTRI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 553
|
1950 INSC 18
|
ESCR010000131950
|
26-05-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,MAR,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language6' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('6','1950_1_553_563','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_6' aria-label=" THE NEW PIECEGOODS BAZAR CO., LTD., BOMBAY versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('6','1950','1950_1_553_563','1950INSC18'); ><font size='4'> <strong>THE NEW PIECEGOODS BAZAR CO., LTD., BOMBAY<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 553</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 18</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000131950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS 553 deposited with the respondents did not require regis­ tration and was properly admitted in evidence to prove the creation of the charge. The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Appeal dismissed. Agent for the appellant: Tarachand Brijmohanlal. Agent for JJ.] Indian Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), s. 9(1) (iv)-Income from pt"Operty-Computation-Deductions-"Annual charge .not being capital charge"-"Annual charge" ·and '~capital .charge", mean-· ittgi of-Charge for. municipal . property tax and urban<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 26-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 66/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 4 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('6','1950','1950_1_553_563','1950INSC18');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('6','1950','1950_1_553_563','1950INSC18','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_553_563
|
1950INSC18
|
2025-06-12T22:10:32.285437
|
1950
|
|
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, BENGAL versus SRI KESHAB CHANDRA MANDAL
|
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, BENGAL
|
SRI KESHAB CHANDRA MANDAL
|
M. PATANJALI SASTRI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 435
|
1950 INSC 11
|
ESCR010000071950
|
09-05-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language9' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('9','1950_1_435_452','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_9' aria-label=" COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, BENGAL versus SRI KESHAB CHANDRA MANDAL pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('9','1950','1950_1_435_452','1950INSC11'); ><font size='4'> <strong>COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, BENGAL<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>SRI KESHAB CHANDRA MANDAL </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 435</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 11</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000071950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> COURT REPORTS COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, BENGAL V. SRI KESHAB CHANDRA MANDAL [SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA and DAS JJ.] 435 Bdngal Agriciiltiiral Income-tax Act, (IV of 1944), ss. 24, 57- Riiles u.nder the Act, r. 11, Forni No. 5-Ret11rn of Rules. framed under the Bengal Agricultural Income~tax Act, 1944, provided that the declaration in a return of income !;ad to be signed "in the case of an individual, by the individual himself." A return of au illiterate assessee, Keshab Chandra l\fandal, was signed in the vernacular as<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 09-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 88/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('9','1950','1950_1_435_452','1950INSC11');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('9','1950','1950_1_435_452','1950INSC11','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_435_452
|
1950INSC11
|
2025-06-12T22:10:44.671459
|
1950
|
|
A.K. GOPALAN versus THE STATE OF MADRAS.
|
A.K. GOPALAN
|
THE STATE OF MADRAS.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 88
|
1950 INSC 13
|
ESCR010000361950
|
19-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language7' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('7','1950_1_88_334','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_7' aria-label=" A.K. GOPALAN versus THE STATE OF MADRAS. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('7','1950','1950_1_88_334','1950INSC13'); ><font size='4'> <strong>A.K. GOPALAN <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE OF MADRAS. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 88</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 13</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000361950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> 88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950) A.K.GOPALAN ti. THE STATE OF MADRAS. UNION OF INDIA : INTERVENER. [SHRl HAluLAL KANIA C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, l'ATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, MuKHERJF:A and S. R. DAs JJ.J Preventive Detention Act (IV of 1950), ss. 3, 7, 10-14.-VaJid­ ity-Constitution of under Art. 19 (5)-Scope of Art. 19- Right of free movement and Right to personal liberty, nature and incidents of-Art. 221 whether complete code as to preventive detro· tion-Scope and applicability of Art. 21-"Law," "procedure established ·by law,"<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 19-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT TO PETITION (CRIMINAL)... No. 13/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('7','1950','1950_1_88_334','1950INSC13');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('7','1950','1950_1_88_334','1950INSC13','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_88_334
|
1950INSC13
|
2025-06-12T22:10:34.511522
|
1950
|
|
PRITAM SINGH versus THE STATE
|
PRITAM SINGH
|
THE STATE
|
M. PATANJALI SASTRI
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 453
|
1950 INSC 9
|
ESCR010000081950
|
05-05-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,GUJ,HIN,KAN,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language10' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('10','1950_1_453_459','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_10' aria-label=" PRITAM SINGH versus THE STATE pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('10','1950','1950_1_453_459','1950INSC9'); ><font size='4'> <strong>PRITAM SINGH<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 453</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 9</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000081950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI</strong><br> Constitution of India, Art. 136 (1)-Special leave to appeal­ Granting of leave-Guiding principles-Final hearing-Nature of. The Supreme Court will not grant special leave to appeal under Art. 136 (1) of the Constitution unless it is shown that exceptional and special circumstances exist, that question presents features of sufficient gravity to warrant a review of the decision appealed against. The view that once an appeal has been admitted by special leave, the entire case is at large and the appellant is free to contest all the findings of fact and raise every point which could be<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 05-05-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('10','1950','1950_1_453_459','1950INSC9');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('10','1950','1950_1_453_459','1950INSC9','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_453_459
|
1950INSC9
|
2025-06-12T22:10:46.817723
|
1950
|
|
PROVINCE OF BOMBAY versus KUSALDAS S. ADVANI AND OTHERS
|
PROVINCE OF BOMBAY
|
KUSALDAS S. ADVANI AND OTHERS
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 621
|
1950 INSC 21
|
ESCR010000191950
|
15-09-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language5' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('5','1950_1_621_741','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_5' aria-label=" PROVINCE OF BOMBAY versus KUSALDAS S. ADVANI AND OTHERS pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('5','1950','1950_1_621_741','1950INSC21'); ><font size='4'> <strong>PROVINCE OF BOMBAY<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>KUSALDAS S. ADVANI AND OTHERS </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 621</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 21</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000191950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SUDHI RANJAN DAS<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup></strong><br> COURT REPORTS PROVINCE OF BOMBAY ti. KUSALDAS S. ADV ANI AND OTI;IERS [SHRI fuRILAL KANIA c. J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MEHR CHAND MAHAJAN, Mt:KHERJV.A and DAs JJ.] 621 Bombay I.And Requisition Ordinance ( V of 1947), ss. 3, 4, 10, 12-0rder requisitioning Land-Application for writ of of power ·to requisition -Whether collateral fact or compo,site part of power to requisition­ Distinction between jujicial or quasi-judicial acts, and administr• tive acts-Guiding principles and tests-Writ of certiorari-Nature and incidents of the writ- -Power of High Court to<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 15-09-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 3/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('5','1950','1950_1_621_741','1950INSC21');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('5','1950','1950_1_621_741','1950INSC21','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_621_741
|
1950INSC21
|
2025-06-12T22:10:33.638012
|
1950
|
|
EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY
|
EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 969
|
1950 INSC 42
|
ESCR010000401950
|
21-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language11' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('11','1950_1_969_979','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_11' aria-label=" EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('11','1950','1950_1_969_979','1950INSC42'); ><font size='4'> <strong>EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF J. K. DUBASH<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 969</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 42</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000401950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SUDHI RANJAN DAS</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 969 EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ] . K. DUBA.SH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, BOMBAY CITY. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., PATANJALI SASTRI and DAS JJ.] Indian Inrom•-tax Act (XI of 1922), s. 25 (4)-Succmion­ D~rith of person carrying on business-Executors ca.•rrying on levied under the Income-tax Act of 1918 died on the 9th of April, 1942, leaving a will by which he authorised his executore to carry ou his business as a going concern, as if they were absolute owners but without being responsible for looe, for • period not exceeding 12 months during which<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 105/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('11','1950','1950_1_969_979','1950INSC42');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('11','1950','1950_1_969_979','1950INSC42','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_969_979
|
1950INSC42
|
2025-06-12T22:16:45.021818
|
1950
|
|
JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE
|
JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS
|
THE STATE
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 940
|
1950 INSC 37
|
ESCR010000371950
|
14-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,KAN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language13' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('13','1950_1_940_949','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_13' aria-label=" JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('13','1950','1950_1_940_949','1950INSC37'); ><font size='4'> <strong> JANARDAN REDDY AND OTHERS <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 940</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 37</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000371950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> Ohowdhuri v. The Union of India and OthtJTS. DasJ. 1950 Dec. 14, 940 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] and their shareholders and has penalised this particular company and its shareholders, leaving out other com­ panies and their shareholders who may be equally guilty of the alleged vice against article 14 of our Constitution. The result, therefore, is that this petition ought to succeed and the petitioner should have an order m terms of prayer (3) of the petition with costs. Petition dismissed . Agent for the.petitioner: M. S. K. Aiyengar . Agent for opposite party Nos. 1 &<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 14-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 71/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 6 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('13','1950','1950_1_940_949','1950INSC37');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('13','1950','1950_1_940_949','1950INSC37','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_940_949
|
1950INSC37
|
2025-06-12T22:16:49.639846
|
1950
|
|
GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS.
|
GNANAMBAL AMMAL
|
T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS.
|
BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 949
|
1950 INSC 40
|
ESCR010000381950
|
21-12-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language10' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('10','1950_1_949_960','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_10' aria-label=" GNANAMBAL AMMAL versus T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('10','1950','1950_1_949_960','1950INSC40'); ><font size='4'> <strong>GNANAMBAL AMMAL<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>T. RAJU AYYAR AND OTHERS. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 949</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 40</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000381950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 949 render any assistance to them. An omission to pro- 1950 vide for such relief in the Constitution cannot be d . d b h S C d · fJanardan Reddy reme 1e y t e upreme ourt an assumption o d Oth jurisdiction which is not warranted by the clear words an v. "' ii!O' of Petitions dismissed. Agent for the petitioners : I. N. Shroff. Agent for the respondent: P. A. Mehta. GNANAMBAL AMMAL v. T. RAJU A YYAR AND OTHERS. [SAIYID FAZL ALI, MuKHERJEA and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.] Hindu law-Will-Construction-General pinciples-Presunw tion ag iinst intestacy. The<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 13/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('10','1950','1950_1_949_960','1950INSC40');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('10','1950','1950_1_949_960','1950INSC40','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_949_960
|
1950INSC40
|
2025-06-12T22:16:43.612548
|
1950
|
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL versus CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD.
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL
|
CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 1008
|
1950 INSC 39
|
ESCR010000011950
|
21-12-1950
|
Appeal(s) allowed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language8' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('8','1950_1_1008_1018','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_8' aria-label=" COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL versus CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('8','1950','1950_1_1008_1018','1950INSC39'); ><font size='4'> <strong>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>CALCUTTA AGENCY LTD. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 1008</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 39</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000011950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SUDHI RANJAN DAS</strong><br> Jankid-:u v, Mohanlal and Another, Pata1tjali S11stri J. !950 Deo, 21. 1008 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1950] of section 14, it seems to me, they would be bringing themselves under the bar of section 18 (2). The respondents cannot therefore claim that the loss of the goods was explosion damage in order to a void the bar under section 18. Both sec­ tion 14 and section 18 have in view the physical cause for the loss or damage to property for which compen­ sation is claimed and not the cause of action in rela­ tion to the person against whom relief is sought. The<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 59/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Appeal(s) allowed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('8','1950','1950_1_1008_1018','1950INSC39');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('8','1950','1950_1_1008_1018','1950INSC39','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_1008_1018
|
1950INSC39
|
2025-06-12T22:16:34.882461
|
1950
|
|
V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS
|
V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR
|
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS
|
BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 961
|
1950 INSC 41
|
ESCR010000391950
|
21-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,BEN,GUJ,HIN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language9' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('9','1950_1_961_968','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='BEN'>বাংলা - Bengali</option><option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_9' aria-label=" V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('9','1950','1950_1_961_968','1950INSC41'); ><font size='4'> <strong>V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 961</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 41</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000391950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> COURT REPORTS 961 V. V. R. N. M. SUBBAYYA CHETTIAR V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME.TAX, MADRAS. [SAIYID FAZL Au, MUKHERJEA and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.J Indian Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), s. 4A (b)-Hindu undivided family-Residence-Tests--Occasional visits to India and attending to family affairs will be taken to be resident in the taxable terri­ torieE1, but such a. presumption will not apply if the case can be brought under the second part of the provision, (ii) the word 11 affairs " means affairs which are .relevant for the purpose of the Income-tax Act and which have some<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 21-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 38/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('9','1950','1950_1_961_968','1950INSC41');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('9','1950','1950_1_961_968','1950INSC41','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_961_968
|
1950INSC41
|
2025-06-12T22:16:36.578355
|
1950
|
|
MANGAN LAL DEOSHI versus MOHAMMAD MOINUL HAQUE & OTHERS.
|
MANGAN LAL DEOSHI
|
MOHAMMAD MOINUL HAQUE & OTHERS.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 833
|
1950 INSC 32
|
ESCR010000321950
|
01-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,BEN,GUJ,HIN,KAN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language16' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('16','1950_1_833_840','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='BEN'>বাংলা - Bengali</option><option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='KAN'>ಕನ್ನಡ - Kannada</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_16' aria-label=" MANGAN LAL DEOSHI versus MOHAMMAD MOINUL HAQUE & OTHERS. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('16','1950','1950_1_833_840','1950INSC32'); ><font size='4'> <strong>MANGAN LAL DEOSHI <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>MOHAMMAD MOINUL HAQUE & OTHERS. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 833</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 32</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000321950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SUDHI RANJAN DAS</strong><br> S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 833 of the Indian Penal Code, and direct that he be set at 195" liberty forthwith. In crdinary circumstances, we -d-. . b Afohin er Singh might have remanded the case for a fresh tnal, ut we v. consider that such a course would, in the present The State. case, appellant: R.S. Narula. Agent for the respondent: P.A. Mehta. MANGAN LAL DEOSHI v. MOHAMMAD MOINUL HAQUE & OTHERS. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., PATANJALI SASTRT and DAS JJ.] Indian R<gistration Act. 1908. s. 17 (1) (bl awl (d), !. 17 (21 - " Lease "-Conivromise decree<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 01-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 94/1949</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('16','1950','1950_1_833_840','1950INSC32');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('16','1950','1950_1_833_840','1950INSC32','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_833_840
|
1950INSC32
|
2025-06-12T22:47:30.706712
|
1950
|
|
CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
|
CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI
|
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 869
|
1950 INSC 36
|
ESCR010000351950
|
04-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language15' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('15','1950_1_869_940','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_15' aria-label=" CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('15','1950','1950_1_869_940','1950INSC36'); ><font size='4'> <strong>CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 869</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 36</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000351950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SUDHI RANJAN DAS<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup></strong><br> COURT REPORTS CHIRANJIT LAL CHOWDHURI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS. 869 [SHRI HARILAL KANIA, C.J., SAIYID FAZL ALI, PATANJALI SASTRI, MuKHERJEA and DAS JJ.] Sholapllr Spinning and Weaving Company (Emergency Pro· <isions) Act (XXVIII of 1950)-Act dismissing managing agents of a not to be de~rived of property save by attthority of law-Right to acqiiire, hold and dispose of property-Right to equal protection of law-Constit,.tion of India, Arts. 14, 19 (1) (!), 19(5), 31, 32-" Deprivation of properly", 11 Property"," acqiiisitio1z", ''taking<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 04-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 72/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 5 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('15','1950','1950_1_869_940','1950INSC36');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('15','1950','1950_1_869_940','1950INSC36','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_869_940
|
1950INSC36
|
2025-06-12T22:47:28.275787
|
1950
|
|
RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY versus BAIJNATH BAJORIA.
|
RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY
|
BAIJNATH BAJORIA.
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 840
|
1950 INSC 33
|
ESCR010000331950
|
01-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language18' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('18','1950_1_840_851','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_18' aria-label=" RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY versus BAIJNATH BAJORIA. pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('18','1950','1950_1_840_851','1950INSC33'); ><font size='4'> <strong>RAJA KAMALA RANJAN ROY <span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>BAIJNATH BAJORIA. </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 840</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 33</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000331950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, M. PATANJALI SASTRI, SUDHI RANJAN DAS</strong><br> Lal Deas hi '· Mohammad Moi.nul Haque & Others. Patanjali Saatri J, 1950 Dec, 1. 840 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1950] thereafter. As pointed out by the Judicial Committee in H emanta K uinar' s case (1 ) "An agreement for a lease, which a lease is by the statute declared to include, is found, must in their opinion relate to some document which creates a present and immediate interest in the land." The compromise decree expressly provides that unless the sum of Rs. 8,000 was paid within the stipulated time the Singhs were not to execute the decree or to take possession<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 01-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 4/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('18','1950','1950_1_840_851','1950INSC33');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('18','1950','1950_1_840_851','1950INSC33','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_840_851
|
1950INSC33
|
2025-06-12T22:47:38.660316
|
1950
|
|
YESWANT DEORAO DESHMUKH versus WALCHAND RAMCHAND KOTHARI
|
YESWANT DEORAO DESHMUKH
|
WALCHAND RAMCHAND KOTHARI
|
HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 852
|
1950 INSC 34
|
ESCR010000341950
|
01-12-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,HIN,PUN
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language17' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('17','1950_1_852_868','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_17' aria-label=" YESWANT DEORAO DESHMUKH versus WALCHAND RAMCHAND KOTHARI pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('17','1950','1950_1_852_868','1950INSC34'); ><font size='4'> <strong>YESWANT DEORAO DESHMUKH<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>WALCHAND RAMCHAND KOTHARI </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 852</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 34</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000341950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : HARILAL JEKISUNDAS KANIA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SUDHI RANJAN DAS, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS YESWANT DEORAO DESHMUKH v. WALCHAND RAMCHAND KOTHARI. [SHRI HARILAL KANIA C.J., DAS and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.] [1950] Limitation Act (II of 1908), ss. 14 (21, 18, Art. 182-Giuil Pro· C1ldure God• (V of 1908), s. 48-Execution of decree-Application after 12 cution against particular property-"Whether saves limitation under Art. 182-Applicability of s. 18-Decree direoting payment of deficit court fe. b•fore execution-Whether conditional decree-Starting point of limita.tian-Time spent in proceedings to adjudge judgment­ debtw insolvent,<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 01-12-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 37/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('17','1950','1950_1_852_868','1950INSC34');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('17','1950','1950_1_852_868','1950INSC34','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_852_868
|
1950INSC34
|
2025-06-12T22:47:36.579888
|
1950
|
|
SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR
|
SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS
|
THE STATE OF BIHAR
|
BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA
| null |
[1950] 1 S.C.R. 799
|
1950 INSC 31
|
ESCR010000291950
|
30-11-1950
|
Dismissed
|
Supreme Court of India
|
ENG,BEN,GUJ,HIN,MAL,MAR,PUN,TEL,URD
|
<select class='form-select form-select-sm me-2' id='language19' name='language' onchange="javascript:get_pdf_lang('19','1950_1_799_805','1950');" style='display: inline; width: 90px !important;background-color: #89c8bd;'>
<option value=''>English</option> <option value='BEN'>বাংলা - Bengali</option><option value='GUJ'>ગુજરાતી - Gujarati</option><option value='HIN'>हिन्दी - Hindi</option><option value='MAL'>മലയാളം - Malayalam</option><option value='MAR'>मराठी - Marathi</option><option value='PUN'>ਪੰਜਾਬੀ - Punjabi</option><option value='TEL'>తెలుగు - Telugu</option><option value='URD'>اُردُو - Urdu</option></select> <br>
<div class='modal fade' id='DisclaimerModal' data-bs-backdrop='static' data-bs-keyboard='false' tabindex='-1' aria-labelledby='DisclaimerModalLabel' aria-hidden='true'>
<div class='modal-dialog'>
<div class='modal-content'>
<div class='modal-header'>
<h5 class='modal-title' id='DisclaimerModalLabel'> Disclaimer </h5>
<button type='button' class='btn-close' data-bs-dismiss='modal' aria-label='Close'></button>
</div>
<div class='modal-body'> <p>
Due care and caution has been taken by the Editorial Section, Supreme Court of India to provide complete and accurate information in the English version.
Judgments in regional languages are also made available alongside the English version. The translations are being done with the help of various human agencies and software tools.
Reasonable efforts have been made to provide an accurate translation.
Hindi Judgment as published in Ucchtam Nyayalya Nirnay Patrika are reproduced under approval of Vidhi Sahitya Prakashan, Department of legislative affairs, Govt. Of India.
Supreme Court Registry will not responsible for incorrect or inaccurate translation and for any error, omission or discrepancy in the content of translated text.
The translation of Judgements is provided for general information and shall have no legal effect for compliance or enforcement.
If any questions arise related to the accuracy of the information/statement contained in the translated judgment, users are advised to verify from the original judgments and also to refer to correct position of law while referring to old judgments. </p><p>
Visitors to the site are requested to cross check the correctness of the information on this site with the authorities concerned or consult the relevant record. The information made available here is not meant for legal evidence. Neither the Courts concerned nor the National Informatics Centre (NIC) nor the e-Committee is responsible for any data inaccuracy or delay in the updation of the data on this website. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for any damage or loss arising from the direct/indirect use of the information provided on the site. However, we shall be obliged if errors/omissions are brought to our notice for carrying out the corrections.
</p></div></div></div></div><button type='button' role='link' class='btn btn-link p-0 text-start' id='link_19' aria-label=" SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR pdf" class='noToken' href='#' onclick=javascript:open_pdf('19','1950','1950_1_799_805','1950INSC31'); ><font size='4'> <strong>SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS<span class='fst-italic'> versus </span>THE STATE OF BIHAR </strong>- <span class='escrText'>[1950] 1 S.C.R. 799</span><span class='ncDisplay'>1950 INSC 31</span><input type='hidden' id='cnr' value=ESCR010000291950></button></font><br><strong>Coram : BIJAN KUMAR MUKHERJEA<sup style="color: #268e97;font-size: 22px;top: 0;" class="tooltip-sup" data-tooltip="Author">*</sup>, SIR SYED FAZL ALI, N. CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR</strong><br> SUPREME COURT REPORTS SETH PREMCHAND SATRAMDAS v. THE STATE OF BIHAR. [SAIYID FAZL ALI, MUKHERJEA and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.J 799 Bihar Sales Tax Act (VI of 1944), s. 21 (3)-0rder of High 0011.rt Tefttsirig to require Board of Reven,~J,g to state case-Appeal to Federal High Court dismissing an application under s. 21 (3) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1941, to di!'ect the Bi-ard of Revenue, Bihar, to state a case and refer it to the High Court. Such an order i!;l not a" final order" within the meaning of cl. 31 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High<br><strong class='caseDetailsTD' ><span style='color:#212F3D' > Decision Date :</span><font color='green'> 30-11-1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Case No :</span><font color='green'> CIVIL APPEAL No. 61/1950</font><span style='color:#212F3D' > | Disposal Nature :</span><font color='green'> Dismissed</font> <span style='color:#212F3D' > | Bench :</span><font color='green'> 3 Judges</font></strong><div class='row my-1 mt-2 border bg-light'><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_flip('19','1950','1950_1_799_805','1950INSC31');><i class='fas fa-book-open me-2' ></i>Flip view</a></div><div class='col-auto'><a href='#' class='btn btn-outline-secondary btn-sm my-1' onclick=open_pdf('19','1950','1950_1_799_805','1950INSC31','N'); ><i class='fas fa-file-pdf me-2'></i>PDF</a></div></div>
|
1950_1_799_805
|
1950INSC31
|
2025-06-12T22:47:40.750317
|
1950
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 13