Dataset Viewer
The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Cannot get the split names for the config 'default' of the dataset.
Exception:    SplitsNotFoundError
Message:      The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
                  for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 80, in _split_generators
                  raise ValueError(
                  ...<2 lines>...
                  )
              ValueError: The TAR archives of the dataset should be in WebDataset format, but the files in the archive don't share the same prefix or the same types.
              
              The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 68, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
                  for split in get_dataset_split_names(
                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      path=dataset,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      config_name=config,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      token=hf_token,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
                  info = get_dataset_config_info(
                      path,
                  ...<6 lines>...
                      **config_kwargs,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
                  raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
              datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

burst_gemini_utterances (Dataset A)

3598 whole utterances from real audio, each carrying a blind gemini-3.8-flash vocal-burst annotation and the general + script training conversion built from it.

WebDataset: data/vbg-utt-*.tar, 4 shards. Per sample:

  • <key>.ogg — the whole utterance, 48000 Hz mono OGG/Vorbis. Decoded once from the corpus MOSS codes with the half-speed canary (samples_per_frame == sr/12.5 = 3840) asserted on every row; a row that failed was dropped, not repaired. 0 rows failed it.
  • <key>.json — Gemini's events (spans, 1-3 labels, confidence, free-text description), the corpus's own class and spans, the source dataset, the verification level, and the converted general + script.

Duration: median 11.8 s, mean 11.723 s, max 32.0 s.

The general + script conversion, and its round trip

script is this project's training format, produced by anno.render from the word alignment and the burst spans, with Gemini's spans substituted for the detector's. general is the row's own voice/style caption and is not rewritten — Gemini was never asked about voice or style, and putting its prose there would smuggle model text into a field the corpus builds from a different instrument. Everything Gemini contributed is in the script.

The clock is the audio, not the row: dur_s is replaced by frames / 12.5 (13.6 % of corpus rows state a burst longer than their own clip because those two disagree) and every span is clamped into it. Overlapping Gemini events are merged first, since the renderer subtracts a burst's overlap with speech but not with another burst.

Every emitted script is parsed back with the same parser the GRPO reward uses and the row is dropped unless the labels return in the same order, no burst runs past the audio, the spoken text survives verbatim, and the emitted numbers sum to the clip within 0.50 s. That tolerance is calibrated, not chosen: rendering the corpus's own detector spans through the identical path over 792 rows gives a residual of p50 0.00, p99 +0.26, range -1.20..+0.40.

The check was validated against itself. Running the whole 3667-row selection through the identical round trip on the corpus's own spans converts 3,255/3,280 = 99.2 %, so a failure on Gemini's spans is attributable to Gemini and not to the check.

Per-class ladder

Target per class: >= 200 verified rows available -> take 200; 100-199 -> take 100; fewer than 100 -> take everything there is. "Available" is counted after the publication and manufactured-row exclusions, because a row that cannot ship is not available.

tier classes meaning
full-200 11 T1 >=200 verified available -> capped at 200
reduced-100 1 T2 100-199 available -> capped at 100
below-100 5 T3 <100 available -> took everything (strict only)
below-100+relaxed 18 T3r <100 strict -> took everything strict, then family-relaxed rows
relaxed-only 14 T3x no strict row exists -- certified entirely by the relaxed gate

Read the capped? column. A class sitting at 100 because the target stopped it is a different fact from a class sitting at 82 because 82 is everything that exists, and both appear below. 23 of 49 classes are exhausted — they contain every publishable verified row this corpus has.

class tier strict avail. rows strict family-relaxed capped? Gemini top-1 top-3 family
chuckle full-200 370 199 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 82.4 % 88.9 % 88.9 %
low_mumble full-200 318 199 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 0.5 % 1.5 % 10.5 %
sharp_inhale full-200 300 198 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 28.3 % 48.0 % 93.9 %
contented_sigh full-200 553 197 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 3.0 % 12.7 % 70.0 %
deep_breath full-200 537 197 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 42.6 % 66.0 % 72.1 %
exhausted_groan full-200 272 197 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 3.0 % 17.8 % 41.6 %
breathy_giggle full-200 253 196 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 12.2 % 74.5 % 78.1 %
resonant_hum full-200 414 196 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 2.5 % 45.4 % 78.1 %
scream full-200 443 196 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 42.4 % 53.1 % 56.1 %
yawn full-200 434 195 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 32.8 % 34.9 % 34.9 %
wistful_sigh full-200 336 193 200 0 yes, by the 200 target 13.5 % 24.9 % 71.0 %
childlike_giggle reduced-100 106 93 100 0 yes, by the 100 target 3.2 % 8.6 % 83.9 %
surprised_gasp below-100 82 79 82 0 no — 82 is all there is 8.9 % 15.2 % 38.0 %
ahem below-100 79 78 79 0 no — 79 is all there is 1.3 % 1.3 % 1.3 %
hiss below-100 6 6 6 0 no — 6 is all there is 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
sharp_whistle below-100 1 1 1 0 no — 1 is all there is 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
soft_whistle below-100 1 1 1 0 no — 1 is all there is 0.0 % 0.0 % 0.0 %
exasperated_sigh below-100+relaxed 72 100 72 28 yes, by the 100 target (needed relaxed rows) 29.0 % 51.0 % 64.0 %
soft_hum below-100+relaxed 46 98 46 54 no — 116 is all there is at either level 18.4 % 64.3 % 74.5 %
cackle below-100+relaxed 22 96 22 78 no — 120 is all there is at either level 13.5 % 31.2 % 90.6 %
shriek below-100+relaxed 48 77 48 31 no — 79 is all there is at either level 9.1 % 59.7 % 72.7 %
mournful_wail below-100+relaxed 53 57 53 5 no — 58 is all there is at either level 10.5 % 17.5 % 26.3 %
guffaw below-100+relaxed 3 55 3 52 no — 55 is all there is at either level 5.5 % 12.7 % 80.0 %
sniff below-100+relaxed 1 47 1 46 no — 47 is all there is at either level 10.6 % 10.6 % 95.7 %
effort_grunt below-100+relaxed 5 33 5 28 no — 33 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 3.0 % 93.9 %
frustrated_groan below-100+relaxed 1 32 1 31 no — 32 is all there is at either level 21.9 % 56.2 % 84.4 %
purr below-100+relaxed 3 26 3 29 no — 32 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 0.0 % 53.8 %
growl below-100+relaxed 6 25 6 19 no — 25 is all there is at either level 4.0 % 4.0 % 68.0 %
deep_breathing below-100+relaxed 6 19 6 13 no — 19 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 5.3 % 47.4 %
trembling_whimper below-100+relaxed 16 18 16 2 no — 18 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 5.6 % 66.7 %
affirmative_grunt below-100+relaxed 13 17 13 4 no — 17 is all there is at either level 11.8 % 11.8 % 52.9 %
pleasure_moan below-100+relaxed 3 16 3 13 no — 16 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 0.0 % 81.2 %
coughing below-100+relaxed 7 14 7 7 no — 14 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 7.1 % 7.1 %
heavy_breathing below-100+relaxed 1 14 1 13 no — 14 is all there is at either level 0.0 % 35.7 % 92.9 %
cough below-100+relaxed 6 10 6 4 no — 10 is all there is at either level 30.0 % 60.0 % 60.0 %
nervous_giggle relaxed-only 0 87 0 88 no — 88 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 2.3 % 79.3 %
fearful_gasp relaxed-only 0 61 0 61 no — 61 relaxed rows, 0 strict 3.3 % 31.1 % 42.6 %
humming relaxed-only 0 53 0 56 no — 56 relaxed rows, 0 strict 54.7 % 81.1 % 90.6 %
snicker relaxed-only 0 52 0 54 no — 54 relaxed rows, 0 strict 1.9 % 48.1 % 71.2 %
displeased_grunt relaxed-only 0 42 0 42 no — 42 relaxed rows, 0 strict 4.8 % 30.9 % 83.3 %
relief_sigh relaxed-only 0 37 0 37 no — 37 relaxed rows, 0 strict 46.0 % 59.5 % 73.0 %
fast_breathing relaxed-only 0 24 0 24 no — 24 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 58.3 % 95.8 %
panting relaxed-only 0 19 0 19 no — 19 relaxed rows, 0 strict 47.4 % 52.6 % 94.7 %
normal_breathing relaxed-only 0 16 0 16 no — 16 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 12.5 % 87.5 %
pain_moan relaxed-only 0 10 0 10 no — 10 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 0.0 % 80.0 %
slow_breathing relaxed-only 0 8 0 8 no — 8 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 0.0 % 75.0 %
snort relaxed-only 0 5 0 5 no — 5 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 20.0 % 40.0 %
whispered_mumble relaxed-only 0 5 0 5 no — 5 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 0.0 % 80.0 %
clears_throat relaxed-only 0 4 0 4 no — 4 relaxed rows, 0 strict 0.0 % 50.0 % 50.0 %

Source datasets

Every row is attributed from uid + src + voice_key; 0 rows are unattributable and none is guessed.

source rows share
emolia 1038 28.8 %
voice_profile/emolia 835 23.2 %
voice_profile/the_wild_audio 627 17.4 %
voice_profile/kseries 523 14.5 %
vocal_bursts_clean 352 9.8 %
voice_profile/refvoice 118 3.3 %
voice_profile/anime 77 2.1 %
kartoffelphon 28 0.8 %

emolia, kartoffelphon and vocal_bursts_clean rows are recordings of people (1418 rows). voice_profile/* rows are LAION voice profiles: DramaBox-written text spoken by a synthetic voice built from a real speaker, where the burst was scripted as a cue and then confirmed by the detector in the produced audio. They are labelled human_recording: false on every sample so a consumer can split on it.

Nothing here is spliced, concatenated or voice-converted. The one manufactured row that survived the filter (vb:improved_synthetic) was excluded by name.

What was excluded, and why

reason rows
not_publishable:podcast 2094
manufactured 3
  • Podcast rows are not published. 2094 rows matching (EN|DE|ZH)_<11-char youtube id>_W###### were dropped before selection. Their transcripts are not open, and laion/tts-realspeech-sft-en-de — the public release these rows come from — ships emolia + kartoffelphon + mls and deliberately omits them.
  • Mediathek: the restriction does not bite here, and this is worth stating precisely. The brief flagged ~937 the_wild_audio rows. Those rows are src == 0 voice profiles, not the_wild_audio recordings and not the_wild_audio transcripts: the text is DramaBox-written and the voice is a synthetic one built from a the_wild_audio speaker. laion/laion-voice-profiles-sft (public, CC-BY-4.0) already ships exactly these — its part-00377 is 100 % the_wild_audio_# voices. They ship here too. This corpus contains no real the_wild_audio recordings or transcripts, so there was nothing of the restricted kind to exclude.
  • MLS: no MLS row survived the strict burst filter, so the source is absent rather than excluded.
  • Attribution is an allowlist: an unrecognised uid is not publishable.

Two verification levels, never mixed unlabelled

Every row carries verification, one of:

  • strict (2727 rows) — the gate that built $SC/buckets_strict: every target span carries a same-class detection within 1.5 s and the weakest clears theta = 0.174.
  • family_relaxed (871 rows) — identical in every other respect (same theta, same tolerance, same geometry gate, no new compute, scored from the same stored detector output) except that a detection from the same burst family counts. This is the metric the owner accepted on 2026-09-02.

Family-relaxed rows were admitted only for classes that could not reach their ladder tier on strict rows alone. The strict filter was never loosened to hit a target: a class short of 100 is reported short. The per-class table below gives both counts for every class, so the whole relaxed set drops out with one filter.

What Gemini said, against the label the corpus already carried

Pooled over 3598 rows, 5161 events (1.434 per row):

level per row (clip scope) restricted to events overlapping the corpus span
top-1 label == corpus class 19.0 % 17.0 %
corpus class in the 1-3 labels 37.3 % 33.4 %
same burst family 64.8 % 59.0 %
Gemini returned no burst at all 8.2 % —

70 distinct taxonomy labels were used in some slot and 59 as a top label, against the detector's 8. 0 labels outside the taxonomy were returned.

Span width — the weak part of this release

§55 measured this model's spans at 38.2 % clip coverage for a 1.27x lift over chance at containing the clip's loudest moment, against our detector's 6.5 % for 3.57x. It is better at what and worse at where. Measured again on this release:

median mean p90
Gemini event duration (s) 0.76 0.969 1.6
corpus detector span (s) 0.36 0.479 0.936
fraction of the clip Gemini covers 0.1 0.176 0.479

How this was handled: by not hiding it. Nothing is silently narrowed. Dataset B cuts the span Gemini actually asserted, plus 50 ms. An energy-tightened window is computed and shipped as metadata (nucleus_start_s, nucleus_end_s) so a consumer can narrow deliberately and reversibly, and every segment carries speech_overlap_frac — the fraction of the span covered by an aligned word — because a wide span sitting over speech is the specific way this data is wrong. Median speech overlap is 0.0, p90 0.595.

Use Dataset B for the label. Do not use it to train a locator.

These labels are a second opinion, not verified ground truth

Every agreement number in this README is between two models: this project's burst detector, which produced the class each row was already filed under, and gemini-3.8-flash, which was asked blind. Both are downstream of models trained on expressive speech. A shared prior would inflate every one of these figures and nothing measured here can see it. What this release adds is a measurably broader second opinion — 70 of the 83 taxonomy classes used against the detector's 8 — not a verification. Whether a given label is correct is a listening question, and $SC/pages/gemini_traindata/ exists to answer it.

How the annotation was done

  • Blind. The request never named the class the row was filed under, never said a burst had been found, and never carried the transcript. §55 established the reason: told to expect a shriek, this model finds one. The corpus label is joined back on only in scoring, after every response is on disk.
  • Whole utterances only. On 20 excerpts cut out of audio the same model had itself left unannotated, it said "no burst" once and returned Scream/Shriek eleven times. Its labels are context-dependent and not stable under re-segmentation, so nothing shorter than a whole utterance was ever sent. Dataset B's segments are cut out of those whole-utterance spans afterwards; they were never annotated on their own.
  • Closed 83-class taxonomy in the system instruction, structured JSON response schema, temperature 0, 1-3 labels per event most-likely-first, and an explicit licence to answer "nothing here" (8.2 % of rows did).
  • 3598 calls, 3,977,142 prompt + 577,683 output + 2,369,979 thinking tokens.

Audio format: OGG, and why not MP3

laion/vocal-bursts-clean is 48 kHz mono MP3 and matching it was the plan. MP3 encoding works here — lameenc 1.8.4 round-trips at corr 0.9998 — so this is not a missing-encoder story. It is a measurement: on all six clips tested, the decoded MP3 leads the input by exactly 1,105 samples = 23.0 ms at 48 kHz and runs 32–40 ms long at the tail. That is LAME's encoder delay; a player cancels it using the Xing/LAME info frame, and lameenc exposes no API to write one. Read with soundfile or librosa — which is how this data will be read — every span in this release would sit 23 ms off its own audio, and spans are the entire content.

OGG/Vorbis through libsndfile is sample-exact on the same clips (0 samples added, 0 lag) and about 40 % smaller, so the release ships OGG at the same 48 kHz mono. gt_audio.to_mp3 is kept and tested; MP3_DELAY_SAMPLES_48K = 1105 records the number an MP3 release would have to compensate.

Licence and provenance

Rows derive from laion/tts-realspeech-sft-en-de, laion/laion-voice-profiles-sft and laion/vocal-bursts-clean (all CC-BY-4.0). Annotations are gemini-3.8-flash output. Not uploaded — staged only.

Licence

Per source, not one licence for the whole set. These are complete utterances of real speech, so each row carries the terms of the corpus it came from — read the source field and follow that corpus. This is deliberately unlike the segment release (laion/vocal-bursts-gemini-segments, CC BY 4.0), which holds only sub-second non-verbal fragments.

The Gemini annotations themselves — spans, labels, confidences — are CC BY 4.0.

Downloads last month
23