context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
P 9 Here, in contrast, "the indictment ... made no reference, direct or implied," to facts that necessarily imply Robles could not have committed the charged offense without also having committed the lesser offense. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "610 P.2d 1045, 1048",
"parenthetical": "\"Often facts may support another lesser conviction but if not charged in the indictment, the lesser offense may not be found.\"",
"sentence": "See Brown, 195 Ariz. 206, ¶ 10, 986 P.2d at 242 (“[I]t is the charging document and not t... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "635 P.2d 870, 872",
"parenthetical": "\"The test which determines the appropriateness of a lesser included instruction and verdict form by an analysis of the facts of a given case, i.e., the evidentiary test ... is not followed in Arizona.\"",
"sentence": "See Brown, 195 Ariz. ... | 5,269,086 | b |
Indeed, every declaration currently before the Court supports FCPS. In short, Roberts' allegations are the type of fanciful allegations that no reasonable juror could believe. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue for trial.\"",
"sentence": "See id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (“Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "124 F.3d 640, 640",
"parenthetical": "\"Fanciful inferences and bald speculations of the sort no rational trier of fact would draw or engage in at trial need not be drawn or engaged in at summary judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (“Where the record ... | 3,578,206 | a |
Indeed, every declaration currently before the Court supports FCPS. In short, Roberts' allegations are the type of fanciful allegations that no reasonable juror could believe. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "132 F.3d 145, 149",
"parenthetical": "to avoid summary judgment, the nonmoving party \"must offer some hard evidence that its version of the events in question is not wholly fanciful.\"",
"sentence": "See id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (“Where the record taken as a whole could... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue for trial.\"",
"sentence": "See id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (“Where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational... | 3,578,206 | b |
While the court recognizes that a statutory redemption period may extend the Debt- or's right to cure the default under SS 1322(c)(1), West Virginia law does not have such a redemption period, and therefore, the Debtor's right to cure the default ends at the foreclosure sale. See Colon v. Option One Mortg. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "319 F.3d 912, 920",
"parenthetical": "stating that a debtor's right to cure a home mortgage after foreclosure survives if the state allows a statutory period of redemption",
"sentence": "Corp., 319 F.3d 912, 920 (7th Cir.2003) (stating that a debtor’s right to cure a home... | {
"signal": "contra",
"identifier": "423 F.3d 617, 620",
"parenthetical": "providing that the Bankruptcy Code precludes a cure of a home mortgage after a foreclosure sale based solely on a mortgagee's statutory right of redemption",
"sentence": "Corp., 319 F.3d 912, 920 (7th Cir.2003) (stating that a debtor’s r... | 5,740,535 | a |
Significant differences in opinion clearly exist amongst the Circuits that now have ruled on the issue of whether double jeopardy attaches in a civil forfeiture proceeding to bar a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same offense. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "civil forfeiture constitutes punishment which bars subsequent criminal prosecution as double jeopardy",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy do... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "double jeopardy does not attach in civil forfeiture to bar subsequent criminal action",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy does not attach in civ... | 7,790,576 | b |
Significant differences in opinion clearly exist amongst the Circuits that now have ruled on the issue of whether double jeopardy attaches in a civil forfeiture proceeding to bar a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same offense. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "civil forfeiture constitutes punishment which bars subsequent criminal prosecution as double jeopardy",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy do... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "double jeopardy does not attach in civil forfeiture to bar subsequent criminal action",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy does not attach in civ... | 7,790,576 | b |
Significant differences in opinion clearly exist amongst the Circuits that now have ruled on the issue of whether double jeopardy attaches in a civil forfeiture proceeding to bar a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same offense. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "double jeopardy does not attach in civil forfeiture to bar subsequent criminal action",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy does not attach in civ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "civil forfeiture constitutes punishment which bars subsequent criminal prosecution as double jeopardy",
"sentence": "See United States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 573, 130 L.Ed.2d 490 (1994) (double jeopardy do... | 7,790,576 | a |
Furthermore, a breach of the duty to assist in this case would not be an error of the sort that should be contemplated in the CUE analysis because the original RO decision in 1972 is not final for purposes of appeal. A claim of CUE is a collateral attack that can only be made on a final RO or Board decision, see id. at... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2 Vet.App. 307, 311",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the Board did not mail decision in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C. SS 7104(e), the period within which to appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims did not commence to run",
"sentence": "See Ta... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "8 Vet.App. 359, 361",
"parenthetical": "concluding that \"where VA has failed to procedurally comply with statutorily mandated requirements, a claim does not become final for purposes of appeal to the [Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims]\"",
"sentence": "See Tablazon v. Brown... | 11,210,542 | b |
Furthermore, a breach of the duty to assist in this case would not be an error of the sort that should be contemplated in the CUE analysis because the original RO decision in 1972 is not final for purposes of appeal. A claim of CUE is a collateral attack that can only be made on a final RO or Board decision, see id. at... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2 Vet.App. 307, 311",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the Board did not mail decision in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C. SS 7104(e), the period within which to appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims did not commence to run",
"sentence": "See Ta... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "6 Vet.App. 518, 519",
"parenthetical": "holding that where an appellant \"never received notification of any denial ..., the one-year period within which to file an NOD, which commences with 'the date of mailing of notice of the result of initial review or determination,' did not... | 11,210,542 | b |
Furthermore, a breach of the duty to assist in this case would not be an error of the sort that should be contemplated in the CUE analysis because the original RO decision in 1972 is not final for purposes of appeal. A claim of CUE is a collateral attack that can only be made on a final RO or Board decision, see id. at... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2 Vet.App. 307, 311",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the Board did not mail decision in accordance with the provisions of 38 U.S.C. SS 7104(e), the period within which to appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims did not commence to run",
"sentence": "See Ta... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "2 Vet.App. 662, 666",
"parenthetical": "stating that where an appellant and his representative had not properly been furnished with a Statement of the Case, the period in which to appeal the adjudicative determination in question never commenced to run and that determination was ... | 11,210,542 | b |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "411 U.S. 475, 487-489",
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "See P... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "418 U.S. 555, 555-558",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the Du... | 1,245,322 | a |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "94 S.Ct. 2974, 2974-2975",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "411 U.S. 475, 487-489",
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "See P... | 1,245,322 | b |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "93 S.Ct. 1827, 1835-1836",
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "418 U.S. 555, 555-558",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the Du... | 1,245,322 | a |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "93 S.Ct. 1827, 1835-1836",
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "94 S.Ct. 2974, 2974-2975",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the... | 1,245,322 | a |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "See Preiser v. Rodriguez... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "418 U.S. 555, 555-558",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the Du... | 1,245,322 | a |
We reject the state's contention that Jensen's claims do not involve the deprivation of substantial rights protected by the section 2254 habeas corpus mechanism. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "94 S.Ct. 2974, 2974-2975",
"parenthetical": "when a state created a statutory right to good time credit, prisoner's interest is embraced within Fourteenth Amendment \"liberty\" to entitle him to those minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "state prisoners' allegations that corrections officials acted unconstitutionally in depriving them of good time credits deemed \"just as close to the core of habeas corpus as an attack on the prisoner's conviction\"",
"sentence": "See Preiser v. Rodriguez... | 1,245,322 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "536 U.S. 203, 203-04",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick,... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "536 U.S. 203, 203-04",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick,... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "536 U.S. 203, 203-04",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick,... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434-3... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434-3... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers); Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434-3... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434-35",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began ques... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434-35",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began ques... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434-35",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began ques... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two officers approached a citizen on a bus and requested his consent to search his luggage",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning passengers... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "446 U.S. 555, 555",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and be... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "446 U.S. 555, 555",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and be... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "446 U.S. 555, 555",
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and be... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "554 F.3d 84, 84",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "Se... | 3,637,829 | a |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "501 U.S. 434, 434",
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning... | 3,637,829 | b |
First, the officers' insistence that Mrs. James accompany her daughter to the hospital would not cause a reasonable person to feel powerless to decline the officers' request or otherwise terminate the encounter. Indeed, the Supreme Court has repeatedly rejected the notion that a seizure occurs when an officer approache... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"The Supreme Court has made clear that a Fourth Amendment 'seizure does not occur simply because a police officer approaches an individual and asks a few questions.' \" (quoting Bostick, 501 U.S. at 434, 111 S.Ct. 2382",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Dray... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "no seizure when two DEA agents approached a citizen at an airport and requested identification and her airline ticket",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Drayton, 536 U.S. at 203-04, 122 S.Ct. 2105 (no seizure when three officers boarded a bus and began questioning... | 3,637,829 | b |
Nevertheless, each inquiry "might be subsidiary to a question embracing both -- Was there a taking?" Id. Thus, plaintiffs' position that the WARA effected a taking in two different ways reflects their advancement of "separate arguments in support of a single claim," rather than separate claims. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "82 Fed.Cl. 211, 211-13",
"parenthetical": "determining that the government effected both physical and regulatory takings of the plaintiffs' property",
"sentence": "Id. at 535, 112 S.Ct. 1522; see also Acceptance Ins. Cos., 583 F.3d at 854 (“A ‘taking’ may occur either by physic... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "583 F.3d 854, 854",
"parenthetical": "\"A 'taking' may occur either by physical invasion or by regulation.\" (emphasis added",
"sentence": "Id. at 535, 112 S.Ct. 1522; see also Acceptance Ins. Cos., 583 F.3d at 854 (“A ‘taking’ may occur either by physical invasion or by r... | 4,090,346 | b |
However, the jury could have fairly concluded the assault on Buford was part of a continuous chain of events that started when appellants were across the street planning to enter the presumably (at 3 a.m.) occupied house. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "699 A.2d 373, 386",
"parenthetical": "reasonable jury could have found that shootings [or a stabbing] were \"a means of facilitating the successful completion of the armed burglary, and that the burglary and the [stabbing] were 'all part of one continuous chain of events' \"",
... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "813 A.2d 169, 176-77",
"parenthetical": "evidence sufficient for aiding and abetting where appellant arrived with two companions, who had visible guns, and remained with them as one made threats to kill and the other shot two people",
"sentence": "See Lee v. United States,... | 9,029,059 | a |
We agree with the trial court's conclusion that King failed to show that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance with respect to this matter. As an initial point, we note that we previously considered and rejected the merits of King's Batson challenge on direct appeal. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "546 U.S. 333, 341",
"parenthetical": "concluding that it was reasonable for the trial court to accept as race-neutral reasons for striking a minority female juror the facts that she was nineteen years old, single, lacked ties to the community, and might be too tolerant of th... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "998 So.2d 597, 604-05",
"parenthetical": "holding that the State's age-based justification for exercising a strike was pretextual in that case, but noting that a juror's age can be a relevant consideration when evaluating the genuineness of a proffered justification",
"sentence... | 12,348,475 | a |
We agree with the trial court's conclusion that King failed to show that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance with respect to this matter. As an initial point, we note that we previously considered and rejected the merits of King's Batson challenge on direct appeal. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "concluding that it was reasonable for the trial court to accept as race-neutral reasons for striking a minority female juror the facts that she was nineteen years old, single, lacked ties to the community, and might be too tolerant of the crimes at iss... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "998 So.2d 597, 604-05",
"parenthetical": "holding that the State's age-based justification for exercising a strike was pretextual in that case, but noting that a juror's age can be a relevant consideration when evaluating the genuineness of a proffered justification",
"sentence... | 12,348,475 | a |
We agree with the trial court's conclusion that King failed to show that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance with respect to this matter. As an initial point, we note that we previously considered and rejected the merits of King's Batson challenge on direct appeal. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "concluding that it was reasonable for the trial court to accept as race-neutral reasons for striking a minority female juror the facts that she was nineteen years old, single, lacked ties to the community, and might be too tolerant of the crimes at iss... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "998 So.2d 597, 604-05",
"parenthetical": "holding that the State's age-based justification for exercising a strike was pretextual in that case, but noting that a juror's age can be a relevant consideration when evaluating the genuineness of a proffered justification",
"sentence... | 12,348,475 | a |
The Fourth Circuit concluded: "[I]n light of Duncan and its progeny, it is appropriate to focus on the maximum penalty authorized by statute in determining if a crime is 'serious' for involuntary medication purposes. Such an approach respects legislative judgments regarding the severity of the crime . . . while at the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"the seriousness of the crime and [the defendant's] perceived dangerousness to society are evident from the substantial sentence [that the defendant] faces if convicted\"",
"sentence": "Id.; see also United States v. Green, supra, 532 F.3d 549 (“the maxi... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"the maximum statutory penalty is the most objective means of determining the seriousness of a crime and the standard we adopt\"",
"sentence": "Id.; see also United States v. Green, supra, 532 F.3d 549 (“the maximum statutory penalty is the most obj... | 4,345,051 | b |
Ms. Ramsey first argues that the district court failed to recognize that LCMC's reasons for the termination have shifted over time, which is evidence tending to show pretext. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "429 F.3d 986, 994",
"parenthetical": "holding that inconsistency in employer's reasons for the termination is an indication of pretext",
"sentence": "See Whittington v. Nordam Group Inc., 429 F.3d 986, 994 (10th Cir.2005) (holding that inconsistency in employer’s reasons for th... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "405 F.3d 1104, 1104",
"parenthetical": "holding that conflicting and changing evidence concerning the timing and reasons for termination contributes to a showing of pretext",
"sentence": "See Whittington v. Nordam Group Inc., 429 F.3d 986, 994 (10th Cir.2005) (holding that... | 3,978,612 | a |
Besides, the circumstances of the rape of Makant's daughter differed markedly from the kidnapping, rape and murder in this case. It cannot be said that Makant's behavior in the. jury room rose to the level of juror misconduct. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "265 Ga. 653, 654",
"parenthetical": "jurors' limited discussion of news story about murder of state's witness did not provide basis for new trial",
"sentence": "See also Oliver v. State, 265 Ga. 653, 654 (3) (461 SE2d 222) (1995) (jurors’ limited discussion of news story a... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "163 Ga. 23, 24",
"parenthetical": "jurors must bring their life experiences to the jury room",
"sentence": "See Hilburn v. Hilburn, 163 Ga. 23, 24 (135 SE 427) (1926) (jurors must bring their life experiences to the jury room)."
} | 74,804 | b |
Besides, the circumstances of the rape of Makant's daughter differed markedly from the kidnapping, rape and murder in this case. It cannot be said that Makant's behavior in the. jury room rose to the level of juror misconduct. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "265 Ga. 653, 654",
"parenthetical": "jurors' limited discussion of news story about murder of state's witness did not provide basis for new trial",
"sentence": "See also Oliver v. State, 265 Ga. 653, 654 (3) (461 SE2d 222) (1995) (jurors’ limited discussion of news story a... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "jurors must bring their life experiences to the jury room",
"sentence": "See Hilburn v. Hilburn, 163 Ga. 23, 24 (135 SE 427) (1926) (jurors must bring their life experiences to the jury room)."
} | 74,804 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "310 F.3d 600, 604",
"parenthetical": "finding that the defendant's attorney's waiver of a jury trial was structural error requiring automatic reversal of the defendant's conviction",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the ... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir.... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "170 P.3d 727, 731",
"parenthetical": "holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right, structural error occurred",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "313 F.3d 363, 372",
"parenthetical": "suggesting that a jury waiver issue was \"arguably not subject to harmless error analysis\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was s... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "113 F.3d 1000, 1003",
"parenthetical": "\"[W]e conclude that this error warrants reversal because the district court's failure to ensure the adequacy of [the defendant's] jury waiver affected the basic framework of [the defendant's] trial and we cannot determine whether this effe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "462 F.Supp. 374, 378",
"parenthetical": "\"Denial of the right to trial by jury cannot be deemed harmless error.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structura... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "571 S.E.2d 368, 369",
"parenthetical": "\"We are of the opinion that a harmless error analysis cannot be applied to a jury trial waiver.\"",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury tr... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was st... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "32 P.3d 1226, 1233",
"parenthetical": "declining to say that the failure to advise a defendant of the right to a twelve-person jury was harmless",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a j... | 8,209,671 | a |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | 8,209,671 | b |
Courts in other jurisdictions have also described the denial of the right to a jury trial as structural error. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "27 P.3d 726, 736",
"parenthetical": "finding that the trial court's improper inducement of a jury-trial waiver amounted to a structural defect",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jur... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "refusing to engage in harmless-error analysis where there was no valid jury waiver",
"sentence": "See, e.g., Miller v. Dormire, 310 F.3d 600, 604 (8th Cir. 2002) (finding that the defendant’s attorney’s waiver of a jury trial was structural error requirin... | 8,209,671 | a |
See Mendoza v. U.S. Atty. While we generally have jurisdiction to review final orders of removal, the petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the date of the final order of removal. Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") SS 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1252(b)(1). The statutory time limit for filing a direct pet... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "514 U.S. 405, 405-06",
"parenthetical": "holding that the finality of a BIA order is not affected by the subsequent filing of a motion to reconsider pursuant to 8 C.F.R. SS 1003.2(b",
"sentence": "See INA § 242(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1); cf. Stone, 514 U.S. at 405-06, 115 S.... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "514 U.S. 386, 405",
"parenthetical": "construing the former 90-day period for filing a petition for review under INA SS 106(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1105a(a",
"sentence": "Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 1549, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (construing the former 90-da... | 5,280,873 | b |
See Mendoza v. U.S. Atty. While we generally have jurisdiction to review final orders of removal, the petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the date of the final order of removal. Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") SS 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1252(b)(1). The statutory time limit for filing a direct pet... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "115 S.Ct. 1549, 1549",
"parenthetical": "holding that the finality of a BIA order is not affected by the subsequent filing of a motion to reconsider pursuant to 8 C.F.R. SS 1003.2(b",
"sentence": "See INA § 242(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1); cf. Stone, 514 U.S. at 405-06, 115 S.... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "514 U.S. 386, 405",
"parenthetical": "construing the former 90-day period for filing a petition for review under INA SS 106(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1105a(a",
"sentence": "Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 1549, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (construing the former 90-da... | 5,280,873 | b |
See Mendoza v. U.S. Atty. While we generally have jurisdiction to review final orders of removal, the petition for review must be filed within 30 days of the date of the final order of removal. Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") SS 242(b)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1252(b)(1). The statutory time limit for filing a direct pet... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "115 S.Ct. 1537, 1549",
"parenthetical": "construing the former 90-day period for filing a petition for review under INA SS 106(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. SS 1105a(a",
"sentence": "Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 1549, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995) (construing the former 90... | {
"signal": "cf.",
"identifier": "514 U.S. 405, 405-06",
"parenthetical": "holding that the finality of a BIA order is not affected by the subsequent filing of a motion to reconsider pursuant to 8 C.F.R. SS 1003.2(b",
"sentence": "See INA § 242(a)(1), 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1); cf. Stone, 514 U.S. at 405-06, 115 S.... | 5,280,873 | a |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.