context stringlengths 58 1.13k | citation_a dict | citation_b dict | case_id int64 475 12.5M | label stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 U.S. 420, 443",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 265... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "104 S.Ct. 3138, 3152",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "82 L.Ed.2d 317, 336",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained during custodial interrogation and without prior Miranda warnings",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "509 Pa. 497, 515",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.E... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "504 A.2d 168, 177",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements obtained in violation of Fifth Amendment right to counsel",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "472 Pa. 435, 449",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "372 A.2d 771, 777",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of statements made following refusal to honor exercise of right to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 2... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "468 Pa. 481, 486",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990) ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "364 A.2d 296, 299",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless analysis to prosecutor's improper comment on defendant's election to remain silent",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d 528, 555 & n. 22 (1990)... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "248 Pa.Super. 62, 72",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "374 A.2d 1317, 1322",
"parenthetical": "applying harmless error analysis to improper introduction of testimony regarding defendant's exercise of right to silence",
"sentence": "See e.g. Pennsylvania v. Muniz, 496 U.S. 582, 605 & n. 22, 110 S.Ct. 2638, 2652 & n. 22, 110 L.Ed.2d ... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "465 Pa. 341, 349-350",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "518 Pa. 405, 415",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confessio... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "543 A.2d 1068, 1072",
"parenthetical": "introduction of statements made by lay witnesses regarding the voluntariness of a confession found to be harmless error",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "469 Pa. 342, 355",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Bec... | 903,251 | a |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "365 A.2d 1237, 1244",
"parenthetical": "curative instruction given following improper admission of statement regarding right to silence held sufficient not to require mistrial",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "246 Pa.Super. 132, 138",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a c... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | 903,251 | b |
In contrast, cases applying the harmless error analysis to the introduction of presumptively coerced statements are legion. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": "369 A.2d 846, 849",
"parenthetical": "recognizing that harmless error analysis is appropriate even if presumptively coerced confession is improperly introduced",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 350 A.2d 797, 801 (1976) (“Because a confes... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "350 A.2d 797, 801",
"parenthetical": "\"Because a confession is the most damning of all evidence, we cannot say that we are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the judgment.\"",
"sentence": "See e.g. Commonwealth v. Bullard, 465 Pa. 341, 349-350, 3... | 903,251 | b |
Also, and again for the reason that the first appeal is closed, we reject any contention, see Reply Brief of Lowry al 12, that the filing of the first notice of appeal presented "unique circumstances" justifying this Court's assertion of jurisdiction over an otherwise untimely appeal. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "489 U.S. 169, 179",
"parenthetical": "explaining that \"unique circumstances\" doctrine \"applies only where a party has performed an act which, if properly done, would postpone the deadline for filing his appeal and has received specific assurance by ' a judicial officer that th... | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned\"",
"sentence": "But see Schwartz v. Pridy, 94 F.3d 453, 456 n. 3 (8th Cir.1996) (noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned”)."
} | 1,743,501 | a |
Also, and again for the reason that the first appeal is closed, we reject any contention, see Reply Brief of Lowry al 12, that the filing of the first notice of appeal presented "unique circumstances" justifying this Court's assertion of jurisdiction over an otherwise untimely appeal. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned\"",
"sentence": "But see Schwartz v. Pridy, 94 F.3d 453, 456 n. 3 (8th Cir.1996) (noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned”)."
} | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "explaining that \"unique circumstances\" doctrine \"applies only where a party has performed an act which, if properly done, would postpone the deadline for filing his appeal and has received specific assurance by ' a judicial officer that this act has been... | 1,743,501 | b |
Also, and again for the reason that the first appeal is closed, we reject any contention, see Reply Brief of Lowry al 12, that the filing of the first notice of appeal presented "unique circumstances" justifying this Court's assertion of jurisdiction over an otherwise untimely appeal. | {
"signal": "but see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned\"",
"sentence": "But see Schwartz v. Pridy, 94 F.3d 453, 456 n. 3 (8th Cir.1996) (noting that \"the continued vitality of the doctrine has been questioned”)."
} | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "explaining that \"unique circumstances\" doctrine \"applies only where a party has performed an act which, if properly done, would postpone the deadline for filing his appeal and has received specific assurance by ' a judicial officer that this act has been... | 1,743,501 | b |
The administrative law judge had no evidence of functional limitations from the alleged incontinence or mental impairments. As a result, the administrative law judge did not err by assessing the residual functional capacity without incorporating limitations from incontinence. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "844 F.2d 664, 666",
"parenthetical": "upholding a finding that incontinence did not render the claimant disabled notwithstanding evidence of bladder leakage and possible need for a second operation",
"sentence": "See Gregory v. Bowen, 844 F.2d 664, 666 (9th Cir.1988) (upholding... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "1996 WL 374184, at *1",
"parenthetical": "\"The RFC assessment considers only functional limitations and restrictions that result from an individual's medically determinable impairment ... including the impact of any related symptoms.\"",
"sentence": "See Gregory v. Bowen,... | 3,898,030 | a |
Even though the United States consented to relinquish its interest by delivering a quitclaim deed to the Sheldens so that the Sheldens eventually held clear title after the foreclosure, this event does not affect whether the original forfeiture judgment constituted a taking. The authorities are clear that forfeiture of... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "364 U.S. 46, 46",
"parenthetical": "\"After transfer to the United States the liens ... could not be enforced because of the sovereign immunity of the Government and its property from suit.\"",
"sentence": "Armstrong, 364 U.S. at 46, 80 S.Ct. at 1567 (\"After transfer to ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "915 F.2d 1543, 1543",
"parenthetical": "\"Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of the taking.\"",
"sentence": "See Yancey, 915 F.2d at 1543 (“Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of th... | 10,515,146 | a |
Even though the United States consented to relinquish its interest by delivering a quitclaim deed to the Sheldens so that the Sheldens eventually held clear title after the foreclosure, this event does not affect whether the original forfeiture judgment constituted a taking. The authorities are clear that forfeiture of... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "80 S.Ct. 1567, 1567",
"parenthetical": "\"After transfer to the United States the liens ... could not be enforced because of the sovereign immunity of the Government and its property from suit.\"",
"sentence": "Armstrong, 364 U.S. at 46, 80 S.Ct. at 1567 (\"After transfer... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "915 F.2d 1543, 1543",
"parenthetical": "\"Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of the taking.\"",
"sentence": "See Yancey, 915 F.2d at 1543 (“Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of th... | 10,515,146 | a |
Even though the United States consented to relinquish its interest by delivering a quitclaim deed to the Sheldens so that the Sheldens eventually held clear title after the foreclosure, this event does not affect whether the original forfeiture judgment constituted a taking. The authorities are clear that forfeiture of... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "915 F.2d 1543, 1543",
"parenthetical": "\"Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of the taking.\"",
"sentence": "See Yancey, 915 F.2d at 1543 (“Fair market value under the Fifth Amendment is normally ascertained at the date ... of th... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "819 F.2d 450, 450",
"parenthetical": "just compensation defined as \"fair market value of property on the date it is appropriated ... the date of the transfer of title\"",
"sentence": "Armstrong, 364 U.S. at 46, 80 S.Ct. at 1567 (\"After transfer to the United States the ... | 10,515,146 | b |
Third, despite the Board's acknowledged breach of the duty to assist here, the majority declines to hold open the 1990 Board decision on the basis that, at the time of that decision, the law pertaining to VA's duty to assist by obtaining SSA records "was not clearly defined." Ante at 109. By this, the majority apparent... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "188 F.3d 1331, 1331-32",
"parenthetical": "discussing VA Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1, Part VI, Para. 6.04(b), requiring VA to make supplemental request for SMRs when initial request results in obtaining only partial records",
"sentence": "Ante at 109-110; see Hayre, 188... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "2 Vet.App. 181, 188",
"parenthetical": "VA failure to obtain SSA records after receipt of SSA decision determining unemployability is breach of duty to assist",
"sentence": "Ante at 109-110; see Hayre, 188 F.3d at 1331-32 (discussing VA Adjudication Procedure Manual M21-1,... | 11,105,170 | a |
We have interpreted Doyle to allow prosecutors to comment on post -Miranda silence in response to defense arguments. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": "594 F.2d 1294, 1296",
"parenthetical": "\"By electing to dwell on the justifications for petitioner's silence after arrest, defense counsel opened the door for the prosecutor to suggest contrary inferences.\"",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.19... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.2d 968, 977",
"parenthetical": "allowing invited comment that defendant was \"not like every other witness in the case\" in response to defense counsel's argument",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), overruled on othe... | 4,128,313 | a |
We have interpreted Doyle to allow prosecutors to comment on post -Miranda silence in response to defense arguments. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.2d 968, 977",
"parenthetical": "allowing invited comment that defendant was \"not like every other witness in the case\" in response to defense counsel's argument",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), overruled on othe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"By electing to dwell on the justifications for petitioner's silence after arrest, defense counsel opened the door for the prosecutor to suggest contrary inferences.\"",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam),... | 4,128,313 | b |
We have interpreted Doyle to allow prosecutors to comment on post -Miranda silence in response to defense arguments. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.2d 968, 977",
"parenthetical": "allowing invited comment that defendant was \"not like every other witness in the case\" in response to defense counsel's argument",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), overruled on othe... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"By electing to dwell on the justifications for petitioner's silence after arrest, defense counsel opened the door for the prosecutor to suggest contrary inferences.\"",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam),... | 4,128,313 | b |
We have interpreted Doyle to allow prosecutors to comment on post -Miranda silence in response to defense arguments. | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"By electing to dwell on the justifications for petitioner's silence after arrest, defense counsel opened the door for the prosecutor to suggest contrary inferences.\"",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam),... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "714 F.2d 968, 977",
"parenthetical": "allowing invited comment that defendant was \"not like every other witness in the case\" in response to defense counsel's argument",
"sentence": "See Bradford v. Stone, 594 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam), overruled on othe... | 4,128,313 | a |
The case law insists that an effective waiver of counsel must include a colloquy that contains an inquiry into the six areas listed above, conducted on the record by the judge. "[A]ny shortcoming relative to this colloquy cannot be gauged to the quality of an accused's self-representation nor justified on the basis of ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "that appellant has been advised of his right to counsel on appeal cannot be inferred from his having prior criminal record",
"sentence": "See also Commonwealth v. Davis, 393 Pa.Super. 88, 573 A.2d 1101, 1106 (Pa.Super.1990) (that appellant has been a... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "appellant's prior experiences as a criminal defendant are irrelevant to the question of whether a \"penetrating and comprehensive\" counsel waiver colloquy was conducted",
"sentence": "See Commonwealth v. Dale, 286 Pa.Super. 308, 428 A.2d 1006 (Pa.Super.1... | 11,766,282 | b |
The case law insists that an effective waiver of counsel must include a colloquy that contains an inquiry into the six areas listed above, conducted on the record by the judge. "[A]ny shortcoming relative to this colloquy cannot be gauged to the quality of an accused's self-representation nor justified on the basis of ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "573 A.2d 1101, 1106",
"parenthetical": "that appellant has been advised of his right to counsel on appeal cannot be inferred from his having prior criminal record",
"sentence": "See also Commonwealth v. Davis, 393 Pa.Super. 88, 573 A.2d 1101, 1106 (Pa.Super.1990) (that app... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "appellant's prior experiences as a criminal defendant are irrelevant to the question of whether a \"penetrating and comprehensive\" counsel waiver colloquy was conducted",
"sentence": "See Commonwealth v. Dale, 286 Pa.Super. 308, 428 A.2d 1006 (Pa.Super.1... | 11,766,282 | b |
The case law insists that an effective waiver of counsel must include a colloquy that contains an inquiry into the six areas listed above, conducted on the record by the judge. "[A]ny shortcoming relative to this colloquy cannot be gauged to the quality of an accused's self-representation nor justified on the basis of ... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "appellant's prior experiences as a criminal defendant are irrelevant to the question of whether a \"penetrating and comprehensive\" counsel waiver colloquy was conducted",
"sentence": "See Commonwealth v. Dale, 286 Pa.Super. 308, 428 A.2d 1006 (Pa.Super.1... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "that appellant has been advised of his right to counsel on appeal cannot be inferred from his having prior criminal record",
"sentence": "See also Commonwealth v. Davis, 393 Pa.Super. 88, 573 A.2d 1101, 1106 (Pa.Super.1990) (that appellant has been a... | 11,766,282 | a |
The case law insists that an effective waiver of counsel must include a colloquy that contains an inquiry into the six areas listed above, conducted on the record by the judge. "[A]ny shortcoming relative to this colloquy cannot be gauged to the quality of an accused's self-representation nor justified on the basis of ... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "573 A.2d 1101, 1106",
"parenthetical": "that appellant has been advised of his right to counsel on appeal cannot be inferred from his having prior criminal record",
"sentence": "See also Commonwealth v. Davis, 393 Pa.Super. 88, 573 A.2d 1101, 1106 (Pa.Super.1990) (that app... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "appellant's prior experiences as a criminal defendant are irrelevant to the question of whether a \"penetrating and comprehensive\" counsel waiver colloquy was conducted",
"sentence": "See Commonwealth v. Dale, 286 Pa.Super. 308, 428 A.2d 1006 (Pa.Super.1... | 11,766,282 | b |
A defendant's making a profit does not preclude its receiving First Amendment protection. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "385 U.S. 374, 396-97",
"parenthetical": "\" 'That books, newspapers, and magazines are published and sold for profit does not prevent them from being a form of expression whose liberty is safeguarded by the First Amendment.' \"",
"sentence": "Time Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 3... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "332 F.3d 924, 924",
"parenthetical": "\"Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.\"",
"sentence": "See also ETW, 332 F.3d at 924 (“Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.”) (citations omitted) ... | 3,667,148 | a |
A defendant's making a profit does not preclude its receiving First Amendment protection. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\" 'That books, newspapers, and magazines are published and sold for profit does not prevent them from being a form of expression whose liberty is safeguarded by the First Amendment.' \"",
"sentence": "Time Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 396-97, 87 S.C... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "332 F.3d 924, 924",
"parenthetical": "\"Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.\"",
"sentence": "See also ETW, 332 F.3d at 924 (“Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.”) (citations omitted) ... | 3,667,148 | a |
A defendant's making a profit does not preclude its receiving First Amendment protection. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "332 F.3d 924, 924",
"parenthetical": "\"Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.\"",
"sentence": "See also ETW, 332 F.3d at 924 (“Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.”) (citations omitted) ... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\" 'That books, newspapers, and magazines are published and sold for profit does not prevent them from being a form of expression whose liberty is safeguarded by the First Amendment.' \"",
"sentence": "Time Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 396-97, 87 S.C... | 3,667,148 | b |
Applying these principles to Chapter 93A claims involving HAMP, courts have held that a bank's handling of efforts to obtain a home loan modification can be independently actionable under Chapter 93A, but only when the conduct is an unfair or deceptive business practice in and of itself. See Dill v. Am. Home Mortg. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "717 F.3d 240, 240",
"parenthetical": "\"Young's Chapter 93A claim ... includes defendants' handling of her entire case, beginning with the negotiations surrounding her forbearance agreement through her attempts to obtain a permanent loan modification.\"",
"sentence": "Serv... | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "935 F.Supp.2d 299, 306",
"parenthetical": "Chapter 93A claim for misleading plaintiffs regarding criteria for HAMP modification and status of their modification application",
"sentence": "Servicing, Inc., 935 F.Supp.2d 299, 306 (D.Mass.2013) (Chapter 93A claim for mislead... | 4,064,251 | b |
Applying these principles to Chapter 93A claims involving HAMP, courts have held that a bank's handling of efforts to obtain a home loan modification can be independently actionable under Chapter 93A, but only when the conduct is an unfair or deceptive business practice in and of itself. See Dill v. Am. Home Mortg. | {
"signal": "no signal",
"identifier": "784 F.Supp.2d 100, 102-03",
"parenthetical": "\"A violation of HAMP that is unfair or deceptive in and of itself could, therefore, create a viable claim under Chapter 93A even though HAMP does not provide a private cause of action.\"",
"sentence": "Servicing, Inc., 935 F.... | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "717 F.3d 240, 240",
"parenthetical": "\"Young's Chapter 93A claim ... includes defendants' handling of her entire case, beginning with the negotiations surrounding her forbearance agreement through her attempts to obtain a permanent loan modification.\"",
"sentence": "Serv... | 4,064,251 | a |
We agree that he received something, and that it would be hard to call it anything but an appeal, but we cannot agree that what he received passed constitutional muster. The purpose of having counsel on appeal is to get a decision on the merits of the appealable issues the record presents. | {
"signal": "see also",
"identifier": "466 U.S. 648, 656",
"parenthetical": "\"[t]he right to the effective assistance of counsel is ... the right of the accused to require the prosecution's case to survive the crucible of meaningful adversarial testing\"",
"sentence": "See Lucey, supra, at 393, 105 S.Ct. 830 (... | {
"signal": "see",
"identifier": null,
"parenthetical": "\"the services of a lawyer will for virtually every layman be necessary to present an appeal in a form suitable for appellate consideration on the merits\"",
"sentence": "See Lucey, supra, at 393, 105 S.Ct. 830 (“the services of a lawyer will for virtuall... | 11,145,856 | b |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.