| id,text,label,category,score | |
| 1,"This is a positive example of machine learning text",1,positive,0.95 | |
| 2,"Negative sentiment in this sample text",0,negative,0.15 | |
| 3,"Neutral example with balanced content",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 4,"Another positive example for training",1,positive,0.88 | |
| 5,"This text contains negative words",0,negative,0.22 | |
| 6,"Machine learning is fascinating technology",1,positive,0.92 | |
| 7,"I don't like this approach",0,negative,0.08 | |
| 8,"The weather is nice today",2,neutral,0.45 | |
| 9,"Excellent performance on this task",1,positive,0.97 | |
| 10,"Poor results from the experiment",0,negative,0.12 | |
| 11,"The data shows mixed results",2,neutral,0.55 | |
| 12,"Amazing breakthrough in AI research",1,positive,0.94 | |
| 13,"Disappointing outcome of the study",0,negative,0.18 | |
| 14,"The temperature is moderate",2,neutral,0.48 | |
| 15,"Outstanding work on this project",1,positive,0.96 | |
| 16,"Failed to achieve the target",0,negative,0.05 | |
| 17,"The results are inconclusive",2,neutral,0.52 | |
| 18,"Brilliant solution to the problem",1,positive,0.93 | |
| 19,"Terrible performance in the test",0,negative,0.11 | |
| 20,"The situation is stable",2,neutral,0.47 | |
| 21,"Fantastic improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.91 | |
| 22,"Complete failure of the system",0,negative,0.03 | |
| 23,"The conditions are normal",2,neutral,0.49 | |
| 24,"Remarkable progress in development",1,positive,0.89 | |
| 25,"Awful experience with the tool",0,negative,0.14 | |
| 26,"The status is unchanged",2,neutral,0.51 | |
| 27,"Incredible breakthrough discovery",1,positive,0.98 | |
| 28,"Horrible mistake in the code",0,negative,0.07 | |
| 29,"The environment is balanced",2,neutral,0.46 | |
| 30,"Exceptional quality of work",1,positive,0.90 | |
| 31,"Dreadful performance metrics",0,negative,0.09 | |
| 32,"The system is functional",2,neutral,0.53 | |
| 33,"Magnificent achievement in science",1,positive,0.95 | |
| 34,"Appalling results from analysis",0,negative,0.16 | |
| 35,"The process is routine",2,neutral,0.44 | |
| 36,"Splendid execution of the plan",1,positive,0.87 | |
| 37,"Abysmal failure of the model",0,negative,0.02 | |
| 38,"The output is standard",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 39,"Glorious success in the experiment",1,positive,0.99 | |
| 40,"Catastrophic error in the system",0,negative,0.01 | |
| 41,"The method is conventional",2,neutral,0.48 | |
| 42,"Phenomenal results from the study",1,positive,0.96 | |
| 43,"Disastrous outcome of the trial",0,negative,0.04 | |
| 44,"The approach is traditional",2,neutral,0.52 | |
| 45,"Extraordinary performance in testing",1,positive,0.94 | |
| 46,"Miserable failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.06 | |
| 47,"The technique is established",2,neutral,0.49 | |
| 48,"Astounding breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.97 | |
| 49,"Wretched performance in evaluation",0,negative,0.13 | |
| 50,"The procedure is standard",2,neutral,0.51 | |
| 51,"Marvelous improvement in efficiency",1,positive,0.92 | |
| 52,"Deplorable results from the test",0,negative,0.08 | |
| 53,"The strategy is proven",2,neutral,0.47 | |
| 54,"Wonderful progress in development",1,positive,0.93 | |
| 55,"Lamentable failure of the system",0,negative,0.15 | |
| 56,"The method is reliable",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 57,"Terrific achievement in science",1,positive,0.95 | |
| 58,"Pitiful performance in analysis",0,negative,0.11 | |
| 59,"The process is consistent",2,neutral,0.48 | |
| 60,"Fabulous results from the study",1,positive,0.91 | |
| 61,"Pathetic failure of the model",0,negative,0.07 | |
| 62,"The approach is systematic",2,neutral,0.52 | |
| 63,"Superb execution of the plan",1,positive,0.96 | |
| 64,"Shameful results from the experiment",0,negative,0.09 | |
| 65,"The technique is methodical",2,neutral,0.49 | |
| 66,"Outstanding breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.98 | |
| 67,"Disgraceful performance in testing",0,negative,0.05 | |
| 68,"The procedure is organized",2,neutral,0.51 | |
| 69,"Excellent improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.94 | |
| 70,"Scandalous failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.12 | |
| 71,"The strategy is structured",2,neutral,0.47 | |
| 72,"Brilliant progress in development",1,positive,0.90 | |
| 73,"Infamous results from the trial",0,negative,0.14 | |
| 74,"The method is systematic",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 75,"Genius achievement in science",1,positive,0.97 | |
| 76,"Notorious failure of the system",0,negative,0.06 | |
| 77,"The process is logical",2,neutral,0.48 | |
| 78,"Masterful execution of the plan",1,positive,0.95 | |
| 79,"Infamous performance in analysis",0,negative,0.10 | |
| 80,"The approach is rational",2,neutral,0.52 | |
| 81,"Artistic breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.93 | |
| 82,"Scandalous results from the study",0,negative,0.08 | |
| 83,"The technique is coherent",2,neutral,0.49 | |
| 84,"Creative improvement in efficiency",1,positive,0.91 | |
| 85,"Disreputable failure of the model",0,negative,0.13 | |
| 86,"The procedure is consistent",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 87,"Innovative progress in development",1,positive,0.96 | |
| 88,"Discreditable performance in testing",0,negative,0.07 | |
| 89,"The method is reliable",2,neutral,0.48 | |
| 90,"Revolutionary achievement in science",1,positive,0.98 | |
| 91,"Disgraceful results from the experiment",0,negative,0.11 | |
| 92,"The strategy is proven",2,neutral,0.51 | |
| 93,"Pioneering breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.94 | |
| 94,"Shameful failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.09 | |
| 95,"The approach is established",2,neutral,0.47 | |
| 96,"Groundbreaking improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.95 | |
| 97,"Notorious results from the trial",0,negative,0.12 | |
| 98,"The technique is conventional",2,neutral,0.50 | |
| 99,"Cutting-edge progress in development",1,positive,0.97 | |
| 100,"Infamous failure of the system",0,negative,0.05 |