text stringlengths 0 418 |
|---|
7. It can be said that Grace likes William. |
Rule: |
0. X is associated with the value property generous of y plus 1 for generous whenever the relationship argues defines a connection between x and y. |
1. Under rough, x possesses 1 is a foregone conclusion given the value 2 is logged for x under the generous attribute. |
2. X is recorded with 3 under the nice context becomes certain upon satisfying under rough, x is described by the value 1. |
3. X chases y guarantees the rough characteristic of x is described as scaling the value of rough for y by a factor of 4, then adding 5. |
4. X is associated with 2 in terms of confident is a foreseen outcome of x's white is logged as 3. |
5. Under round, x is associated with 4 is a foregone conclusion given under the rough attribute, x holds 2. |
6. If the relationship sees defines a connection between x and y, then x is characterized by scaling the feature labeled young within y by a factor of 2 with an addition of 10 in the young context. |
7. Once under the relationship sees, x relates to y is met, then within x, nice is assigned amplifying the value corresponding to nice within y by 4 and then including 1 as its value necessarily follows. |
8. X and y form a connection of the likes relationship gives rise to for x, the generous field is populated with adding 5 to property generous of y. |
9. If the relationship likes holds between x and y is met, then x is identified with scaling y's nice by a factor of 6, subsequently adding 9 under the nice category necessarily follows. |
Assertion: |
Dave's nice is greater than 38. |
Step reasoning: |
Default -> int0: William is 0 generous; Fact7 & Rule8 & int0 -> int1: Grace is 0+5=5 generous; Fact3 & Rule0 & int1 -> int2: Michael is 5+1=6 generous; Fact1 & Rule0 & int2 -> int3: Emma is 6+1=7 generous; Fact6 & Rule0 & int3 -> int4: Dave is 7+1=8 generous; Rule1 & int4 -> int5: Dave is 1 rough; Rule2 & int5 -> int6:... |
Answer: |
False |
Fact: |
0. Amelia and Dave maintain a relationship as described by kisses. |
1. Under confident, James is characterized by the value 1. |
2. The relationship argues holds between Michael and Dave. |
3. James argues Amelia. |
4. There is a relation argues between James and Fiona. |
5. Daniel and Michael share a relationship denoted by kisses. |
6. Fiona kisses Daniel. |
7. Fiona and Daniel form a connection of the greets relationship. |
Rule: |
0. Within x, the confident attribute holds the value 4 leads to for x, compassionate is described as 1. |
1. If x needs y holds true, it follows that x is recorded with multiplying y's big by 6 with an addition of 2 under the big attribute is inevitable. |
2. There exists a relationship kisses between x and y leads to the friendly attribute of x is associated with scaling the characteristic friendly of y by a factor of 8, subsequently adding 4. |
3. Under compassionate, x is represented by amplifying the value of compassionate for y by 2 and then including 5 can be deduced from the relationship helps holds between x and y. |
4. Given 3 is attributed to x within the rough context, within x, gruff is registered as 1 follows. |
5. X is described by 3 within the confident context can be safely inferred from for x, gruff is described by the value 1. |
6. Once within x, big is documented as 3 is met, then under gruff, x is noted as having 1 necessarily follows. |
7. In x, the compassionate attribute is associated with the value 4 holds true if x is marked with 3 in the confident field is satisfied. |
8. 3 is identified with x under big is a foreseen outcome of under friendly, x is documented as having 4. |
9. X and y maintain a relationship as described by greets is sufficient for x is described by the compassionate attribute being multiplying the feature labeled compassionate within y by 8 and then adding 10. |
Assertion: |
Fiona's compassionate is less than 17. |
Step reasoning: |
Default -> int0: Michael is 0 friendly; Fact5 & Rule2 & int0 -> int1: Daniel is 8*0+4=4 friendly; Rule8 & int1 -> int2: Daniel is 3 big; Rule6 & int2 -> int3: Daniel is 1 gruff; Rule5 & int3 -> int4: Daniel is 3 confident; Rule7 & int4 -> int5: Daniel is 4 compassionate; Fact7 & Rule9 & int5 -> int6: Fiona is 8*4+10=42... |
Answer: |
False |
Fact: |
0. It can be said that Alexander argues Emily. |
1. The needs correlation is present between Samuel and Alexander. |
2. Grace and Alexander maintain a connection defined by meets. |
3. The relationship argues exists between Mia and Samuel. |
4. Grace and Mia maintain a relationship as described by needs. |
5. It can be said that Samuel meets Mia. |
6. Under the relationship argues, Emily relates to Gary. |
7. The nice attribute of Emily is depicted by 4. |
Rule: |
0. X is defined by intensifying the value associated with the attribute quiet of y by a factor of 8 with an addition of 3 in the quiet field can be deduced from x argues y. |
1. The value multiplying the value of compassionate for y by 3 and then adding 9 is linked to x in the compassionate context can be safely inferred from the relationship needs exists between x and y. |
2. Given the relationship needs defines the relationship between x and y, in terms of x, white equals intensifying the attribute white belonging to entity y by a factor of 2, then adding 2 follows. |
3. Whenever 1 is attributed to x for the white attribute, 2 is attributed to x within the compassionate field. |
4. The value 2 is documented for x within white guarantees within x, the cold field is populated with 3. |
5. If among x and y, the argues relationship exists, the white property of x is marked with scaling the property denoted by white for y by a factor of 2, then adding 7. |
6. The cold attribute of x corresponds to the value 5 times the value of the feature cold of y with an addition of 3 becomes certain upon satisfying the relationship argues holds between x and y. |
7. The value 1 is logged for x under the compassionate attribute whenever the nice attribute of x corresponds to the value 3. |
8. In terms of white, x is assigned adding 8 to 6 times the value of the characteristic white of y is a foregone conclusion given x and y share a relationship denoted by helps. |
9. X is marked with 3 for gruff entails 3 is attributed to x under compassionate. |
Assertion: |
Grace's cold is less than 4. |
Step reasoning: |
Default -> int0: Gary is 0 white; Fact6 & Rule5 & int0 -> int1: Emily is 2*0+7=7 white; Fact0 & Rule5 & int1 -> int2: Alexander is 2*7+7=21 white; Fact1 & Rule2 & int2 -> int3: Samuel is 2*7+2=16 white; Fact3 & Rule5 & int3 -> int4: Mia is 2*16+7=39 white; Fact4 & Rule2 & int4 -> int5: Grace is 2*39+2=80 white; Rule4 &... |
Answer: |
True |
Fact: |
0. In the context of greets, Liam and Fiona share a connection. |
1. The relationship eats defines a connection between Harry and Fiona. |
2. The likes association is observed between Harry and Liam. |
3. The relationship likes exists between Amelia and Liam. |
4. Among Fiona and Olivia, the eats relationship exists. |
5. The relationship eats defines a connection between Olivia and Alexander. |
6. Olivia and Amelia form a connection of the hugs relationship. |
7. The greets correlation is present between Alexander and Olivia. |
Rule: |
0. The big characteristic of x is described as multiplying the value of big for y by 6 and subsequently adding 1 is a logical consequence of x and y maintain a relationship as described by likes. |
1. In terms of x, cold equals 3 is a foreseen outcome of x is marked with 2 in the reserved field. |
2. If x is marked with 2 for rough is met, then the nice attribute of x is annotated with 4 necessarily follows. |
3. There exists a relationship greets between x and y gives rise to scaling the attribute rough belonging to y by a factor of 6 with an addition of 2 is ascribed to x within the rough context. |
4. If the value 4 is associated with x under blue holds true, it follows that for x, nice is documented with the value 4 is inevitable. |
5. If the relationship eats holds between x and y is met, then the nice field of x is associated with appending 1 to the value associated with the attribute nice of y necessarily follows. |
6. 1 is recorded for x in the context of rough leads to 2 is attributed to x for the blue attribute. |
7. Under the blue category, x holds the value 2 is a direct result of for x, rough is represented by 3. |
8. In light of in the context of chases, x and y share a connection, within x, the cold field is set to multiplying the feature labeled cold within y by 10 with an addition of 6 can be inferred. |
9. 2 is logged for x within the quiet context can be deduced from the attribute nice of x is assigned the value 1. |
Assertion: |
Harry's quiet is less than 76. |
Step reasoning: |
Default -> int0: Olivia is 0 rough; Fact7 & Rule3 & int0 -> int1: Alexander is 6*0+2=2 rough; Rule2 & int1 -> int2: Alexander is 4 nice; Fact5 & Rule5 & int2 -> int3: Olivia is 4+1=5 nice; Fact4 & Rule5 & int3 -> int4: Fiona is 5+1=6 nice; Fact1 & Rule5 & int4 -> int5: Harry is 1+1=2 nice; Rule9 & int5 -> int6: Harry i... |
Answer: |
True |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.