Datasets:

lszoszk
/

hrc-voting

pretty_name: UN Human Rights Voting Records (CHR 1946–2006 · HRC 2006–)
homepage: https://lszoszk.github.io/hrc-voting/
license: other
license_name: polyform-noncommercial-1.0.0
license_link: https://polyformproject.org/licenses/noncommercial/1.0.0/
annotations_creators:
  - expert-generated
  - found
language_creators:
  - found
multilinguality:
  - monolingual
language:
  - en
source_datasets:
  - original
task_categories:
  - tabular-classification
  - text-classification
  - text-retrieval
task_ids:
  - multi-class-classification
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
tags:
  - human-rights
  - united-nations
  - human-rights-council
  - commission-on-human-rights
  - roll-call-votes
  - voting-records
  - international-relations
  - political-science
  - legal
viewer: true
configs:
  - config_name: resolutions
    default: true
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/resolutions-train.parquet
  - config_name: votes
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/votes-train.parquet
  - config_name: clauses
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/clauses-train.parquet
  - config_name: countries
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/countries-train.parquet
  - config_name: subjects
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/subjects-train.parquet

UN Human Rights Voting Records — CHR · HRC

Every voting record catalogued by the OHCHR Search Library for the UN Commission on Human Rights (1946–2006) and its successor the Human Rights Council (2006–present): 6,346 resolutions, 80,159 individual country roll-call votes, and 96,451 clause-segmented paragraphs of the adopted texts.

Harvested from the OHCHR Search Library's MARCXML export and parsed with the pipeline in lszoszk/hrc-voting. The record count matches the collection's own reported total exactly, verified by three independent harvest methods. An interactive dashboard over the same data is at https://lszoszk.github.io/hrc-voting/.

Configs

Three fact tables and two dimension tables.

config	rows	one row is	period
`resolutions` (default)	6,346	a catalogued resolution, decision or amendment	1946–2026
`votes`	80,159	one country's position on one resolution	1947–2026
`clauses`	96,451	one preambular / operative / annex clause	1993–2026
`countries`	154	a state that cast at least one roll-call vote	—
`subjects`	1,033	one OHCHR controlled subject heading	—

from datasets import load_dataset

res       = load_dataset("lszoszk/hrc-voting", "resolutions", split="train")
votes     = load_dataset("lszoszk/hrc-voting", "votes",       split="train")
clauses   = load_dataset("lszoszk/hrc-voting", "clauses",     split="train")
countries = load_dataset("lszoszk/hrc-voting", "countries",   split="train")
subjects  = load_dataset("lszoszk/hrc-voting", "subjects",    split="train")

Join keys: record_id links the three fact tables; iso3 links votes to countries; subject links resolutions / votes / clauses to subjects.

The two dimension tables exist so that caveats which would otherwise be prose are machine-readable — which states no longer exist, which ISO code spans a change of representation rather than of state, and which subject headings name a country situation rather than a theme.

Read this before analysing

These are the four things most likely to produce a wrong result. The first two are mistakes this project made and corrected; derived columns are provided so you do not have to repeat them.

1. Only 27% of resolutions have a per-country roll-call. 1,705 of 6,346. The rest were adopted without a vote or published as totals only, so no individual positions exist. Roll-call statistics describe contested politics, not the Council's output — a well-documented selection problem (Fjelstul, Hug & Kilby 2025). Filter on has_rollcall.

2. An abstention is not a vote against. Under the chamber's own rules a member that abstains is "considered as not voting", so the outcome turns on Yes vs No alone. Taking max(yes, no, abstain) as the winning side — the obvious-looking move — scores the winning Yes bloc as defeated on 53 adopted resolutions in this corpus, where more members abstained than voted Yes but the text still carried. Use prevailing_side / adopted, which are computed correctly (Yes vs No, null on a 6-case tie).

3. Amendments are not resolutions. 731 catalogued items are amendments to draft texts, and 462 of them went to a recorded vote — 27% of all roll-calls, almost all post-2010. A Yes on a hostile amendment frequently opposes the parent text's aim, so pooling them with resolutions inverts meaning. Filter on is_amendment.

4. ~9% of roll-calls do not reconcile with the official totals. For 148 recorded votes the sum of individual Yes/No/Abstain positions does not match the resolution's official 996 totals, almost always by a small margin in abstentions or non-participation. These are inconsistencies in OHCHR's own cataloguing and are preserved as-is; the official totals are treated as authoritative. Filter on rollcall_reconciles.

Config: `resolutions`

One row per catalogued item. Vote totals are the official figures from MARC 996, which exist for many resolutions that have no per-country breakdown.

{
  "record_id": "35356",
  "symbol": "A/HRC/RES/61/10",
  "title": "Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment: mandate of the Special Rapporteur : resolution /",
  "date": "2026-03-30", "year": 2026, "body": "HRC",
  "vote_type": "ADOPTED WITHOUT VOTE", "adoption_mode": "adopted without a vote",
  "is_amendment": false,
  "subject": "TORTURE AND INHUMAN TREATMENT - SPECIAL RAPPORTEURS",
  "agenda_item_no": "3.",
  "agenda_item_title": "Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development.",
  "main_sponsors": "Denmark", "meeting": "Adopted at the 52nd meeting",
  "yes": null, "no": null, "abstain": null, "nonvoting": null, "total": null,
  "n_rollcall": 0, "has_rollcall": false,
  "prevailing_side": null, "adopted": null, "rollcall_reconciles": null,
  "url_resolution": "http://undocs.org/A/HRC/RES/61/10",
  "url_draft": "http://undocs.org/A/HRC/61/L.10",
  "record_url": "https://searchlibrary.ohchr.org/record/35356"
}

record_id — stable Invenio id (MARC 001); join key
symbol — e.g. A/HRC/RES/61/29, E/CN.4/RES/2005/1
title, date, year, body — CHR or HRC
vote_type — raw catalogue value (MARC 591); adoption_mode — readable form
is_amendment — an amendment to a draft text, detected from two agreeing catalogue signals (a : amendment / title marker and the MARC 993 draft note)
subject — OHCHR's own controlled subject heading (MARC 991$d); not ML-derived
agenda_item_no, agenda_item_title, main_sponsors, meeting
yes, no, abstain, nonvoting, total — official totals (MARC 996), null when the catalogue records none
n_rollcall, has_rollcall — number of per-country rows in votes
prevailing_side — Y, N, or null (tie / no totals) — see caveat 2
adopted — prevailing_side == "Y", null when undetermined
rollcall_reconciles — whether the roll-call tally matches the official totals; null when there is no roll-call — see caveat 4
subject_is_country_situation — whether the subject heading names a state or territory rather than a theme; null only where the record carries no subject (219 rows). See the subjects config for how this is derived
url_resolution, url_draft, record_url

Adoption modes: adopted without a vote 3,835 · recorded vote 1,713 · non-recorded vote 371 · withdrawn 236 · non-recorded unanimous 142 · not considered 33 · non-recorded no information 15 · recorded at a closed meeting 1. Bodies: CHR 3,082 · HRC 3,264.

Config: `votes`

One row per (resolution, country). 154 states appear.

record_id, symbol, date, year, body
iso3, country — ISO-3166 alpha-3 and the name as catalogued
un_regional_group — WEOG / Eastern Europe / GRULAC / African / Asia-Pacific, assigned by present-day membership and applied across the whole period
vote — raw code, vote_label — readable
is_cast_vote — true for Y/N/A only
prevailing_side, with_prevailing_side — whether this state was on the side that prevailed; null when it cast no vote or the resolution had no Yes/No outcome
subject, is_amendment — denormalised from resolutions for convenient filtering

Vote codes: Y yes 44,536 · N no 18,368 · A abstain 15,911 · . absent or not participating 701 · empty 643 (not a member at the time, or no position recorded).

Config: `clauses`

Clause-segmented full text of 4,437 resolutions, 1993–2026 — the earliest the OHCHR/ODS document mirrors reach, so this config covers a much shorter period than the other two. Extracted from .doc/.pdf originals and segmented on structural markers.

record_id, symbol, year, body, subject, title, is_amendment, adoption_mode, adopted
clause_index, clause_label — e.g. PP3, OP7, OP2(a), AX1
clause_type — preambular 35,670 · operative 42,957 · operative_subitem 12,498 · annex 2,082 · other 3,244
text, n_chars, n_words

Four experimental columns score top-level operative clauses only (null elsewhere). Each operative paragraph opens by drafting convention with a controlled verb, matched against UNITAR's Terms Used in Resolutions glossaries; 98.5% of operative clauses resolve to a verb.

operative_verb — canonical form, e.g. Requests, Calls upon, Condemns
directive_force — 5 decisional (Decides, Demands, Establishes) · 4 strong exhortation (Urges, Calls upon) · 3 tasking (Requests, Recommends) · 2 invitation (Invites, Encourages); null for non-directive verbs
sentiment — −2 condemnation … 0 neutral registering … +2 commendation; null for directive verbs and for verbs carrying no valence code. For Notes, Takes note, Recognizes and Expresses the score is resolved per clause from the object ("with concern" → −1, "with appreciation" → +1), following a 2001 UN Office of Legal Affairs opinion (endorsed in GA decision 55/488) that the bare terms are neutral
creates_or_tasks_machinery — the delegation axis: true only when a directive clause establishes, renews or extends a mechanism, or names a UN actor and gives it something to do (17.4% of operative clauses). A passing mention of a rapporteur or a report does not count; scoring mentions instead put 40% of clauses on this axis and imported a spurious trend, since OHCHR and the special procedures only expanded after 1993

These columns measure rhetorical / directive hardness, not legal bindingness. Even "Decides" binds only under Security-Council Chapter VII; CHR and HRC resolutions are formally non-binding whatever the verb. Tagging only the leading verb also omits the addressee and the precision of the ask. The tiers are grounded in the "legalization" framework (Abbott, Keohane, Moravcsik, Slaughter & Snidal 2000) and a content-analysis approach developed for Security Council resolutions (Benson & Tucker 2022); the exact rank within a tier and the numeric spacing are an author-defined coding.

Articles of annexed declarations and protocols are labelled annex, not operative — they are treaty-style text, not commitments of the organ, and conflating them shifts every operative-verb statistic.

subject_is_country_situation is carried here too.

Config: `countries`

Dimension table, 154 states. Join on iso3.

iso3, name — display name; the catalogue's own spellings vary over time and are preserved in votes.country
un_regional_group, un_regional_group_code — applied anachronistically: groups are present-day and the Commission's membership changed over 60 years
n_rollcall_cells, n_yes, n_no, n_abstain, n_absent, n_no_position
first_vote_year, last_vote_year — first and last recorded vote, not membership. 12 calendar years contain no recorded vote at all, so a gap here is not evidence a state was off the Council
is_historical_state — true for 5 states that no longer exist: CSK Czechoslovakia, SUN Soviet Union, YUG Yugoslavia, DDR and GER the two Germanys
representation_break_year, representation_break_note — set only for CHN: the China seat passed from the Republic of China to the PRC in October 1971 and the catalogue records both under one code, so a continuous 1947–2026 China series is not one continuous actor

Config: `subjects`

Dimension table, all 1,033 controlled subject headings (MARC 991$d) — OHCHR's own cataloguing vocabulary, not ML-derived, so every label is traceable to the source. Join on subject.

subject — the heading as catalogued, upper-case
is_country_situation — 307 of 1,033 name a state or territory
n_resolutions_all, n_resolutions_recorded — how many resolutions carry it, in the full catalogue and in the roll-call subset

The thematic / country-situation split is a name-matching heuristic: catalogued state names, plus an explicit list of territories and non-member states that never sat on the Council and so never appear in the vote data (Golan Heights, Western Sahara, Kosovo, Darfur, Xizang, …). It is imperfect at the margins. The same matcher produces the dashboard's Topics filter, so the two cannot disagree.

Known data-quality notes

Three MARC 967$b codes contradicted their country name and are repaired by the pipeline, which trusts the name: rec 21027 HUNGARY was coded HND, rec 21028 NORWAY was PER, rec 30508 BRAZIL was BEN. Each had been moving one vote onto another state's profile.
One roll-call row has no country (rec 24737, E/CN.4/RES/6(XX), 1964) — a malformed MARC field. It is kept for fidelity to the source, with iso3 null.
One vote-code typo (y → Y, UK 2011) is normalised. Nothing else is altered.
12 calendar years contain no recorded vote at all (1949, 1951, 1953, 1956–57, 1959–63, 1965, 1973). A state's absence from the roll-call in those years says nothing about its membership.
CHN spans a change of representation, not of state — the China seat passed from the Republic of China to the PRC in October 1971; the catalogue records both as CHN.
un_regional_group is applied anachronistically. Groups are present-day; the Commission's membership and the groups themselves changed over 60 years.
Historical states appear under their own codes (CSK Czechoslovakia, SUN Soviet Union, YUG Yugoslavia, DDR/GER the two Germanys).

Suitable for

Roll-call and ideal-point analysis of a small elected chamber (as opposed to the UN General Assembly, which most of the quantitative literature studies); bloc and alignment work; agenda and subject analysis using the catalogue's own controlled vocabulary; clause-level retrieval over UN human-rights text; and study of drafting language and institutional commitment.

Most quantitative UN-voting findings come from the General Assembly — universal membership, plenary voting. The Commission (53 members elected by ECOSOC) and the Council (47, elected by the GA under regional quotas) are small elected chambers where membership itself is selected and absence is marginal. Treat GA findings as hypotheses here, not established facts.

Provenance and reproduction

Source: OHCHR Search Library, Voting collection. The full pipeline — harvest, parse, build — is in the repository and this package is rebuilt from committed outputs by scripts/prepare_hf_dataset.py. Methods and caveats are documented in the dashboard's Methodology tab and in notes/AUDIT-2026-07.md.

Licence

Code and data are released under the PolyForm Noncommercial License 1.0.0: research, education, non-profit and personal use are permitted; commercial use requires a separate licence from the author. The underlying voting records are public UN documents from the OHCHR Search Library.

Citation

Szoszkiewicz, Ł. (2026). OHCHR Voting Records — CHR · HRC (v1.0.0) [Software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21281232

@software{szoszkiewicz_hrc_voting_2026,
  author    = {Szoszkiewicz, {\L}ukasz},
  title     = {OHCHR Voting Records --- CHR {\textperiodcentered} HRC},
  year      = {2026},
  version   = {1.0.0},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.21281232},
  url       = {https://lszoszk.github.io/hrc-voting/}
}

Built and maintained by Łukasz Szoszkiewicz (Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań) · ORCID 0000-0001-6671-2893.