Dataset Viewer
The dataset could not be loaded because the splits use different data file formats, which is not supported. Read more about the splits configuration. Click for more details.
Couldn't infer the same data file format for all splits. Got {NamedSplit('train'): (None, {}), NamedSplit('validation'): ('json', {}), NamedSplit('test'): ('json', {})}
Error code:   FileFormatMismatchBetweenSplitsError

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

🦈 sharky-workbench

Build logs, audits, sha-pinned scripts, and eval reports for the sharky project (model: luispoveda93/sharky-0.5B). Renamed from minicpm4-pcap-kev-workbench (contents identical).

Key artifacts

Path What it is
phase2/build_summary_v3.json v1 states build summary (49,745 states, verified hex rendering)
phase2/unsw15_label_audit.json Full per-file label histogram of the UNSW-NB15 Packet-Bytes view (18 files, ~180M packets)
phase3a/train_3a.py sha-pinned v1 training script (the validated MiniCPM shim lives here)
phase4/eval_report.json Phase 4 eval: locked-split 0.980, calibration, gate curves for v1
phase5/validation_v4.json Demo Space end-to-end validation report
phase6/ood_diag_v1.json v1 OOD diagnosis (held-out UNSW files F6+F16)
phase6/eval_v1v2.json Head-to-head v1 vs v2 β€” v2 wins all sets (locked 0.9865, UNSW OOD 0.9905, DAPT OOD 0.9848 vs v1 mean 0.801)
phase6/train_v2.py sha-pinned v2 warm-start training script
phase6/build_v2_dapt.py sha-pinned DAPT-2020 ingestion script (flat-key 5-tuple CSV matching)
phase7/benchmark_plan.md Benchmark plan of record (rev 2) β€” kev-referenced, all-local: kev-0.5b/0.6b/4b pcap head-to-heads via kev.serve, untrained-head control, optional Laya, shared public suites, gate coverage@precision curves. Direct Jev API head-to-head deferred until access lands (protocol preserved in appendix; kev-0.6b's published head-to-head serves as the indirect Jev anchor)
phase7/eval_bootstrap_p0.json + manifests.json P0 protocol hardening (executed) β€” bootstrap 95% CIs on all six checkpoint-set pairs from confusion counts, frozen suite manifests (incl. documented non-identical rename of train_3a.py)
phase7/eval_pcap_headtohead.json Head-to-head aggregates (executed) β€” sharky 0.9865/0.9848 vs untrained-head control 0.4350/0.4543 and zero-shot kev-0.5b/0.6b 0.4007/0.4584 (constant-benign collapse); kev-4b pending (GPU infra outage)
phase7/leaderboard.md + postprocess_p7.json Leaderboard + post-processing (executed) β€” paired bootstrap deltas (all baselines 0.53–0.59 below sharky, CIs exclude 0), sharky gate curves (auto-close 40.1% @ 99.9% precision locked; 45.8% max coverage at ≀5% error DAPT), kev probability sanity
phase7/temp_refit.json Temperature re-audit β€” refit on the exact v2 calibration partition lands on T=1.7411, zero drift vs card (8,420 = 2,105 records Γ— 4 questions)
phase7/eval_headtohead.py + postprocess_p7.py sha-pinned phase7 harness (per-arm upserts) and CPU post-processor
phase7/perrecord_minicpm.json / perrecord_kev.json Per-record raw verdict probabilities, ids and labels for every executed arm (paired-bootstrap-ready)

Conventions

  • Every script that ever ran on GPU is published here and fetched by jobs at a pinned commit with in-job sha256 verification β€” the byte-exactness protocol used throughout the project.
  • Audits and summaries are persisted here so results survive job loss (per-arm/per-file checkpointing pattern).

All workbench content is reproducible provenance for luispoveda93/sharky-0.5B and luispoveda93/sharky-triage-states.

Downloads last month
629

Spaces using luispoveda93/sharky-workbench 2