PanoVideoBench / README.md
lulidong's picture
Add paper teaser to dataset card
968eb22 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
6.55 kB
metadata
pretty_name: PanoVideoBench
language:
  - en
task_categories:
  - visual-question-answering
size_categories:
  - 1K<n<10K
tags:
  - panoramic-video
  - video-question-answering
  - multimodal
  - reasoning
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: PanoVideoBench.jsonl

PanoVideoBench

Think in 360°: Benchmarking and Bootstrapping Panoramic Video Reasoning

Think in 360° overview

Summary

A panoramic video records the complete surrounding scene, while the evidence needed to answer a question may appear in different directions and at different times. PanoVideoBench evaluates panoramic video understanding through 1,000 manually annotated four-choice questions over 223 real panoramic videos from 360+x. The questions cover appearance, spatial relations, actions, motion, and temporal events.

Each question includes a semantic category and question type, together with diagnostic labels describing how the relevant view is found and which panoramic capabilities are needed to answer. These labels support evaluation beyond a single overall score.

PanoVideoBench statistics

Benchmark Results

Results from the paper under the default evaluation protocol. All scores are choice accuracy (%), with higher values indicating better performance. Bold marks the best result in each column.

Model Overall APP SPA ACT MOT TEM
Gemini 3.7 Flash 53.1 65.7 49.5 52.4 40.9 36.5
GPT-5.6-sol 49.6 59.9 46.0 51.9 33.5 41.9
Gemma-4-31B-it 47.0 58.4 48.5 44.6 34.8 27.0
Nemotron Omni 30B-A3B 46.3 59.9 46.0 41.6 31.1 35.1
InternVL3.5-8B 44.9 53.8 36.1 49.4 34.1 39.2
Qwen3.8-27B 44.8 54.7 44.1 46.8 31.1 27.0
Qwen3.5-9B 43.2 55.4 36.6 42.5 35.4 27.0
Eagle2.5-8B 39.6 50.5 35.6 38.6 32.3 21.6
MiniCPM-V-4.6 39.0 48.9 37.1 34.3 34.1 25.7
GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 38.0 46.5 38.6 32.2 31.1 32.4
PanoWorld-Hstar 42.9 51.7 45.0 36.5 34.1 37.8
PanoVideoReasoner 55.7 59.6 52.5 60.1 48.8 48.6

APP, SPA, ACT, MOT, and TEM denote appearance and detail perception, spatial and viewpoint reasoning, action and state understanding, motion and identity tracking, and spatio-temporal event reasoning, respectively.

Benchmark Statistics

Property Value
Questions 1,000
Videos 223
Total video duration 23.06 hours
Mean video duration 372 seconds
Semantic categories 5
Question types 15
Choices per question 4
Category Scope Questions
APP Panoramic Appearance and Detail Perception 327
SPA Spherical Spatial and Viewpoint Reasoning 202
ACT Omnidirectional Action and State Understanding 233
MOT Cross-View Motion and Identity Tracking 164
TEM Panoramic Spatio-Temporal Event Reasoning 74

Question Types

Category Types
APP APP-SCN: Scene and Layout Understanding; APP-ENT: Entity and Attribute Recognition; APP-FGR: Fine-Grained Visual Recognition
SPA SPA-OBS: Observer-Centric Spatial Relations; SPA-OBJ: Object-Centric Spatial Relations; SPA-ORI: Orientation and Viewpoint Reasoning
ACT ACT-INT: Action and Interaction Recognition; ACT-STA: State and Transition Understanding; ACT-MUL: Multi-Entity Activity Understanding
MOT MOT-TRK: Trajectory and Identity Tracking; MOT-COM: Camera–Object Motion Disambiguation
TEM TEM-LOC: Event Localization; TEM-ORD: Event Ordering; TEM-COUNT: Event Counting; TEM-AGG: Cross-Time Evidence Aggregation

Diagnostic Annotations

Each question has one target-search label:

Label Name Questions
S0 Direction-Guided Search 312
S1 Landmark-Guided Search 337
S2 Event-/Moving-Entity-Guided Search 265
S3 Unconstrained Panoramic Search 86

Capability labels describe the operations needed after finding the relevant evidence:

Label Name Questions
C0 Find, then Read 343
C1 See the Fine Detail 109
C2 Reason on the Sphere 349
C3 Track Across Views 239
C4 Integrate Evidence Across Sphere–Time 137

C0 identifies questions resolved by local readout. C1–C4 can co-occur, so their counts are not mutually exclusive.

Data Format

PanoVideoBench.jsonl contains one question per line. The release contains annotations and video identifiers; video files are obtained separately from the source collection.

Field Description
id Unique question ID.
video_id Source video identifier.
question English question.
options Four English choices keyed by A, B, C, and D.
correct_option Correct choice letter.
answer Text of the correct choice.
category Primary category code: APP, SPA, ACT, MOT, or TEM.
question_type Secondary type code.
search One target-search label, S0–S3.
capabilities List of capability labels, C0–C4.

Diagnostic labels are provided for all 1,000 questions.

Evaluation Protocol

Use the complete ERP video as the visual input. Uniformly sample frames over the full duration at a target rate of 1 FPS, with at most 128 frames, and resize the long edge to 1,280 pixels. The default setting uses the original ERP representation without perspective mosaics or orientation overlays. The paper uses each model's default generation temperature and a maximum of 32,768 output tokens, including thinking tokens.

Answers and diagnostic labels are evaluation annotations, not model inputs.

Evaluation Metrics

Compare the model's final selected option with correct_option. Accuracy is 100 × number of correct answers / number of evaluated questions.

  • Overall: accuracy over all 1,000 questions. Each question has equal weight; this is not an unweighted average of the five category scores.
  • APP / SPA / ACT / MOT / TEM: accuracy within each semantic category, using 327 / 202 / 233 / 164 / 74 questions, respectively.
  • Diagnostic accuracy: accuracy on the subset carrying each search label (S0–S3) or capability label (C0–C4). A question with multiple capability labels contributes to each corresponding subset.

Citation