| This copy is for personal use only. To order printed copies, contact reprints@rsna.org |
|
|
| 1733 |
|
|
| Fluoroscopic Swallowing Examination: |
| Radiologic Findings and Analysis of |
| Their Causes and Pathophysiologic |
| Mechanisms |
|
|
| Alberto I. Carbo, MD |
| Melanie Brown, CCC-SLP |
| Nour Nakrour, MD |
|
|
| Abbreviations: CP = cricopharyngeus, HLC = |
| hyolaryngeal complex, PES = pharyngoesopha |
| geal segment, UES = upper esophageal sphincter |
|
|
| RadioGraphics 2021; 41:1733–1749 |
|
|
| https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021210051 |
|
|
| Content Codes: |
|
|
| From the Departments of Radiology (A.I.C., |
| N.N.) and Rehabilitation Services (M.B.), Ochs |
| ner LSU Health, 1501 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, |
| LA 71103. Presented as an education exhibit |
| at the 2020 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received |
| March 7, 2021; revision requested April 19 and |
| received May 14; accepted May 23. For this jour |
| nalbased SACME activity, the authors, editor, |
| and reviewers have disclosed no relevant rela |
| tionships. Address correspondence to A.I.C. |
| (email: acarbo1396@gmail.com). |
|
|
| ©RSNA, 2021 |
|
|
| SA-CME LEARNING OBJECTIVES |
|
|
| After completing this journal-based SA-CME |
| activity, participants will be able to: |
| Discuss the anatomy and imaging |
| phases of swallowing. |
| |
| Describe abnormalities detected at |
| fluoroscopic swallowing examination. |
| |
| Correlate the radiologic findings |
| with their causes and pathophysiologic |
| mechanisms. |
| |
| See rsna.org/learning-center-rg. |
|
|
| Dysphagia is a common symptom in the general population, and its |
| prevalence increases with patient age. The deterioration of swallow |
| ing function has many acute and chronic causes, including cerebro |
| vascular and neuromuscular diseases, radiation, and surgery. In an |
| elderly population, diagnosis and treatment of swallowing abnor |
| malities is a high priority because it improves the patient’s quality |
| of life and helps them to avoid medical complications. Fluoroscopic |
| swallowing examinations and modified barium swallow studies are |
| the most used and most reliable diagnostic procedures to evaluate |
| swallowing disorders. Functional anomalies include disturbances |
| of the oral preparatory, oral propulsory, and pharyngeal phases |
| of swallowing as premature spillage from the mouth, nasal regur |
| gitation, delayed initiation of pharyngeal swallowing, incomplete |
| displacement of the hyolaryngeal complex, abnormal epiglottic |
| tilt, incomplete laryngeal closure, and pharyngeal dysmotilities. |
| Anatomic abnormalities of the pharynx include diverticula, be |
| nign strictures, and tumors. The abnormalities diagnosed on the |
| basis of fluoroscopic examination have a variety of treatment strat |
| egies, and the choice of treatment depends on the cause of the |
| anomaly and its pathophysiologic characteristics. The radiologist’s |
| interpretation of these characteristics is crucial to therapeutic de |
| cision making and achieving the best patient outcomes. |
|
|
| Online supplemental material is available for this article. |
|
|
| ©RSNA, 2021 • radiographics.rsna.org |
|
|
| Introduction |
| Oropharyngeal dysphagia is prevalent in 20% of the general popu |
| lation and in 50% of nursing home residents in the United States |
| (1). As the average age of the population continues to increase, |
| there has been an increase in dysphagia and related complications. |
| Fluoroscopically guided swallowing examinations are the most used |
| technique for evaluation of deglutition disorders. The examination is |
| called modified barium swallow when the diagnostic study includes a |
| therapeutic test; in those cases, it is performed with the participation |
| of a swallowing therapist or speechlanguage pathologist (2). |
|
|
| Fluoroscopic examination of swallowing and modified barium |
| swallow should not be routine studies but should be customtailored |
| techniques designed by radiologists and swallowing therapists on |
| the basis of the patient’s clinical history and symptoms. Radiolo |
| gists should supervise or participate in the procedures and contrib |
| ute their knowledge to adapt the technique to unexpected findings |
| detected during examinations. They may decide during the study |
| to include the evaluation of organs such as the esophagus that may |
| explain or be associated with the patient’s symptoms. The radiologic |
|
|
| GASTROINTESTINAL IMAGING |
|
|
| 1734 October Special Issue 2021 |
|
|
| radiographics.rsna.org |
|
|
| TEACHING POINTS |
| Fluoroscopic examination of swallowing and modified barium |
| swallow should not be routine studies but should be custom- |
| tailored techniques designed by radiologists and swallowing |
| therapists on the basis of the patient’s clinical history and |
| symptoms. Radiologists should supervise or participate in the |
| procedures and contribute their knowledge to adapt the tech- |
| nique to unexpected findings detected during examinations. |
| They may decide during the study to include the evaluation of |
| organs such as the esophagus that may explain or be associ- |
| ated with the patient’s symptoms. |
| |
| For evaluation of the function of the PES, radiologists should |
| correlate the following functional units: (a) the opening of the |
| PES, (b) the elevation of the HLC, and (c) the pharyngeal con- |
| traction. Understanding the different possible mechanisms |
| that cause the abnormal function of the segment is essential |
| in deciding the best treatment strategies. |
| |
| As part of the fluoroscopic swallowing examination, a system- |
| atic evaluation of the air-filled structures and soft tissues of the |
| neck may provide information about the causative or associ- |
| ated abnormalities relating to the patient’s symptoms. |
| |
| The development of Zenker diverticula may involve anatomic |
| and pathophysiologic causes that include an area of wall |
| weakness, a distal obstruction due to the diminished opening |
| of the CP, and increased pharyngeal intraluminal pressure as a |
| consequence of mechanical obstruction of the outlet. |
| |
| The radiologic report should include all detected abnormali- |
| ties and should not be limited to description of the visualiza- |
| tion of penetration or aspiration. Because each abnormality |
| has its own specific therapeutic approach, the description |
| of radiologic findings and their correlation with the patho- |
| physiologic mechanisms and possible causes should be stated |
| clearly in the report. A meticulous radiologic diagnosis facili- |
| tates the decision making of referring physicians and swallow- |
| ing therapists. |
| |
| report should describe all the findings additional |
| to penetration or aspiration and present the facts |
| in a way that facilitates decision making by the |
| referring physicians and swallowing therapists. |
|
|
| This article reviews the anatomy and physiol |
|
|
| ogy of swallowing, explains the indications for |
| and techniques of fluoroscopic examination, |
| describes abnormal radiologic findings, and dis |
| cusses their pathophysiologic mechanisms. |
|
|
| The discussion includes the abnormalities |
| of the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES) as |
| diminished or delayed opening and early clos |
| ing and the pathophysiology of the pharyngeal |
| residue after swallowing, penetration, and |
| aspiration. Complications of total laryngectomy |
| are examined, such as leakage, pseudoepiglot |
| tis, anterior pharyngeal pouches, neopharyngeal |
| dysmotilities, strictures, and malfunctioning |
| of the tracheoesophageal prosthesis for voice |
| reconstitution. We describe the radiologic find |
| ings of each abnormality and provide sample |
| images and a discussion of the possible mecha |
| nisms, with consideration of the patient’s clinical |
| history. |
|
|
| Anatomy for Radiographic |
| Interpretation |
|
|
| The oral cavity is bounded by the hard and soft |
| palates superiorly, by the tongue inferiorly, and |
| opens to the oropharynx posteriorly. The nasophar- |
| ynx or epipharynx is bounded by the pharyngeal |
| walls posteriorly and laterally, by the skull base su |
| periorly, and by the soft palate inferiorly. It opens |
| to the nasal cavity anteriorly and communicates |
| with the oropharynx inferiorly through the palato |
| pharyngeal isthmus or velopharyngeal seal. |
|
|
| The oropharynx or mesopharynx is bounded |
| posteriorly and laterally by the pharyngeal walls |
| and constrictor muscles and inferiorly by the su |
| perior surface of the epiglottis and the hyoid bone. |
| It communicates with the nasopharynx superiorly |
| and with the mouth anteriorly. The laryngophar- |
| ynx or hypopharynx is bounded by the pharyngeal |
| walls posteriorly and laterally and extends to the |
| lower border of the cricoid cartilage inferiorly. It |
| communicates with the oropharynx superiorly, |
| with the cervical esophagus inferiorly, and with the |
| laryngeal vestibule anteriorly (3–6) (Fig 1). |
|
|
| Phases of Swallowing |
|
|
| Oral Preparatory Phase |
| The oral preparatory phase involves chewing the |
| food and mixing it with saliva. When the bolus |
| is considered “swallowable,” it is placed between |
| the upper surface of the tongue blade and the |
| palate. The tip of the bolus is held by a seal |
| formed by the tongue and the soft palate that |
| prevents premature leakage into the pharynx |
| before swallowing (7,8) (Fig 2A). |
|
|
| Oral Propulsory Phase |
| During the oral propulsory phase, the bolus is pro |
| pelled into the oropharynx by means of an up |
| ward and backward movement of tongue. During |
| the passage of the bolus, the soft palate elevates |
| to a right angle to oppose the contraction of the |
| posterior and lateral pharyngeal walls that form |
| the Passavant ridge to close the palatopharyngeal |
| isthmus and prevent the penetration of material |
| into the nasopharynx (Fig 2B). |
|
|
| Initiation of Pharyngeal Swallow |
| The next phase is the initiation of the pharyngeal |
| swallow, when the bolus passes the pharyngeal |
| pillars and enters into the oropharynx, triggering |
| the reflex that initiates the nonvoluntary pharyn |
| geal phase of swallowing. |
|
|
| Pharyngeal Phase |
| In the pharyngeal phase, the hyolaryngeal complex |
| (HLC) elevates and shortens the pharynx, de |
| flects the epiglottis, closes the larynx, and opens |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1735 |
|
|
| the PES (Fig 2C). Laryngeal closure starts in the |
| true vocal folds, followed by the false vocal folds, |
| and ends in the laryngeal vestibule. Concurrently, |
| the stripping contraction wave of the posterior |
| and lateral pharyngeal walls begins and propels |
| the bolus into the esophagus. |
|
|
| PES Opening Phase |
| The PES opening phase consists of (a) relaxation of |
| the upper esophageal sphincter (UES); (b) upward |
| and anterior traction of the cricoid cartilage, which |
| is attached to the HLC; and (c) opening of the |
| lumen by means of increased intrabolus pressure |
| by the thrust of the dorsum of the tongue and the |
| pharyngeal constrictors (Fig 2D) (9). |
|
|
| Esophageal Phase |
| The esophageal phase begins when the bolus is |
| propelled through the esophagus into the stom |
| ach by means of esophageal peristalsis. Once |
| the bolus passes into the esophagus, (a) the |
| palatopharyngeal isthmus opens, reestablishing |
| the communication between the nasopharynx |
| and oropharynx and allowing the passage of air; |
| (b) the HLC returns to resting position; (c) the |
| larynx opens; (d) the epiglottis returns to upright |
| position; (e) the PES closes, and (f) respiration |
| resumes (Fig 2E). |
|
|
| Indications for Fluoroscopic |
| Swallowing Examinations |
| Common indications for fluoroscopically guided |
| swallowing examinations are oropharyngeal |
| dysphagia (swallowing difficulty); globus sensa |
| tion; choking and coughing during swallowing; |
| prolonged intubation; cerebrovascular events (ie, |
| stroke); and surgery, trauma, or radiation treat |
| ments to the head and neck (10). |
|
|
| Figure 1. |
| Illustration |
| shows the anatomy of |
| the pharynx. |
|
|
| Fluoroscopic Swallowing Examination |
| Technique |
| The equipment used includes a radiologic appa |
| ratus with fluoroscopy and video recording with |
| slow motion, reverse, and stopframe capabili |
| ties (2,10–13). The patient should be upright |
| or seated in a comfortable position, with their |
| dentures in their mouth. |
|
|
| Lateral views are the most useful to evaluate |
| all phases of swallowing and to detect penetra |
| tions into the airway. Oblique views are per |
| formed to visualize the PES without the shoulder |
| in the way. Frontal views are used to diagnose |
| asymmetric swallowing abnormalities. |
|
|
| Use of short exposure times and high kilovolt |
| age is recommended to improve image resolution |
| and minimize motion blurring of the bolus and |
| anatomic structures. For a functional examina |
| tion, the contrast material used is barium sulfate |
| in a concentration of 40% to 60% weight/volume |
| (mass of solute/volume of solution). Multiple |
| barium viscosities such as thin liquid, nectar |
| thick, honey thick, paste, and solids are used at |
| the speechlanguage pathologist’s discretion. |
| Iodinated watersoluble contrast material is used |
| when leakages or perforations are suspected (13). |
| Videofluoroscopic recording is used to detect |
|
|
| functional abnormalities at 30 frames per sec |
| ond. Compared with videofluoroscopic record |
| ing, rapidsequence digital images are acquired |
| at fewer frames per second, but the images have |
| better spatial resolution and are preferred for |
| anatomic details. |
|
|
| The personnel included in a modified barium |
| swallow examination are a radiographic technolo |
| gist, a radiologist, and a speechlanguage patholo |
| gist. The role of the speechlanguage pathologist |
| is to use strategies that may improve the efficiency |
|
|
| 1736 October Special Issue 2021 |
|
|
| radiographics.rsna.org |
|
|
| Figure 2. |
| Illustrations show the |
| phases of swallowing, which include |
| the oral preparatory phase (A), |
| the oral propulsory phase (B), the |
| pharyngeal phase (C), the PES |
| phase (D), and the esophageal |
| phase (E). |
|
|
| and safety of swallowing, to educate patients about |
| their swallowing function, and to provide swallow |
| ing recommendations on the basis of the radio |
| graphic findings after study completion. |
|
|
| Evaluation of esophageal anatomy and motility |
|
|
| is important. The anatomic site that the patient |
| identifies as the source of the symptoms is not |
| a reliable indicator of the location of the cause. |
| Thus, radiologic examinations of patients with |
| dysphagia should include a morphologic and func |
| tional evaluation of the esophagus and esophago |
| gastric junction, which may be performed before |
| or after the swallowing examination. |
|
|
| Functional Abnormalities |
|
|
| Abnormalities of Oral Preparatory Phase |
| The motion of the tongue is essential for bolus |
| manipulation and the functions of chewing, mix |
| ing food with saliva, and holding the bolus in the |
| mouth before swallowing. When the tongue is |
|
|
| dysfunctional, images may show uncoordinated |
| movements, fragmentation of the bolus, inability |
| to hold it, and drooling and leaking of contrast |
| material into the sulci of the cheeks and floor of |
| the mouth (Fig 3). Causes of tongue failure can |
| be secondary to atrophy, xerostomia, surgery, or |
| severe nerve or brain injuries (7,14,15). |
|
|
| Premature Spillage from Mouth into |
| Pharynx |
| The back of the tongue blade and the soft pal |
| ate form the glossopalatal seal, which keeps the |
| bolus in the mouth before swallowing. Premature |
| spillage from the mouth into the pharynx may be |
| caused by unilateral or bilateral incompetence of |
| the seal, which may allow leakage of material into |
| the pharynx before a swallowing attempt, leading |
| to aspiration through an opened and unprotected |
| airway (Fig 4). Seal ineffectiveness can be a result |
| of weakness, atrophy, or poor muscular coordina |
| tion of the tongue and soft palate due to aging, |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1737 |
|
|
| Figure 3. Leakage into the floor of the mouth in a 77-year-old |
| woman. Lateral radiograph of the oral cavity after the swallow |
| shows that contrast material has leaked into the mouth floor |
| (large arrow) and the sulci of the cheeks (small arrows) because |
| of incompetence of the tongue. |
|
|
| Figure 4. Leakage from the mouth into the pharynx in a |
| 58-year-old woman. Lateral radiograph of the oral cavity and |
| pharynx before swallowing shows contrast material leaking |
| from the mouth bolus to the valleculae and hypopharynx (ar- |
| rows) due to incompetence of the glossopalatal seal. |
|
|
| surgery, radiation, or acute and chronic neuro |
| logic illnesses. For example, patients with Parkin |
| son disease may perform repetitive unsuccessful |
| attempts to swallow the bolus (10,14). |
|
|
| Delayed Initiation of Pharyngeal Swallow |
| When the bolus reaches the oropharynx, it |
| triggers the swallowing reflex that initiates the |
| nonvoluntary pharyngeal phase of swallowing. |
| The initiation of the pharyngeal swallow is rec |
| ognized radiographically by the elevation of the |
| hyoid bone as a component of the HLC. Hyoid |
| elevation starts when the tip of the bolus crosses |
| the angle of the mandible. A delayed swallowing |
| initiation is identified when the contrast material |
| is seen in the pharyngeal lumen but the hyoid |
| bone remains in a resting position (Fig 5). Causes |
| include decreased pharyngeal sensory perception |
| due to injury of mucosal receptors or neurologic |
| damage secondary to aging, radiation, a cerebro |
| vascular accident, or surgery (7,14). |
|
|
| Nasal Regurgitation |
| The palatopharyngeal isthmus or seal should be |
| closed during the bolus transportation from the |
| mouth into the oropharynx. Nasal regurgitation |
| is diagnosed radiographically by evaluating pas |
| sage of the contrast material through a nonclosed |
| seal into the nasopharynx (Fig 6). Nasal penetra |
| tion can occur during transfer of the bolus from |
| the mouth to the pharynx due to incompetence |
| of the isthmus or after swallowing when the |
| seal is open and there is regurgitation from the |
| distal pharynx or esophagus due to an associated |
| distal dysfunction or mechanical obstruction. |
| The causes of an incompetent seal and nasal |
|
|
| Figure 5. Delayed initiation of the pharyngeal swal- |
| low in a 55-year-old man. Lateral radiograph shows the |
| bolus in the oropharynx and hypopharynx (*), with the |
| hyoid bone still in resting position (arrow) due to a de- |
| layed triggering of the swallowing reflex. |
| |
| radiation, surgery, or a cerebrovascular accident. |
| Atrophy of the tongue or soft palate can lead |
| to compensatory hypertrophy of the opposite |
| muscle (10,14). |
| |
| Delayed or Slow Oral Propulsory Phase |
| When the bolus is judged to be “swallowable,” |
| it is placed in a midline depression in the upper |
| surface of the tongue blade until it is transferred |
| into the pharynx. A delayed initiation of tongue |
| propulsion or a slow transportation of the bolus |
| to the pharynx can be secondary to weakness or |
| the inability of the tongue to function because of |
| |
| 1738 October Special Issue 2021 |
| |
| radiographics.rsna.org |
| |
| Figure 8. Frozen pharynx in a |
| 68-year-old woman with a his- |
| tory of radiation therapy. Lateral |
| radiograph shows absent contrac- |
| tions and rigidity of the pharyngeal |
| walls during the passage of bolus |
| and penetration of contrast mate- |
| rial into the larynx (arrow). |
| |
| Figure 6. Nasal regurgita- |
| tion in a 62-year-old man. |
| Lateral radiograph shows |
| contrast material penetrat- |
| ing into the nasopharynx |
| from the oropharynx (*) |
| during bolus displacement |
| because of insufficient clo- |
| sure of the palatopharyn- |
| geal isthmus. |
|
|
| Figure 7. Limited elevation of |
| the hyolaryngeal complex in a |
| 74-year-old man. Lateral radio- |
| graph during swallowing shows |
| that the hyoid bone (blue arrow) |
| did not reach the mandible at its |
| maximum displaced position, as is |
| expected in healthy patients. The |
| limited displacement may be due |
| to scarring of pharyngeal elevator |
| muscles from radiation treatment. |
| Associated findings are a poor |
| pharyngeal contraction, an incom- |
| plete closure of the larynx with |
| contrast material penetration (red |
| arrow), and a diminished opening |
| of the PES (yellow arrow). |
|
|
| regurgitation include atrophy and insufficient |
| elevation of the soft palate due to neurologic |
| diseases, radiation, surgery, or congenital issues |
| such as a cleft palate or a fistula (7,14,16). An |
| oronasal fistula must be ruled out during the |
| examination. |
|
|
| Slow or Incomplete Displacement |
| of HLC |
| A full upward and forward displacement of the |
| HLC is necessary to elevate and shorten the |
| pharynx, deflect the epiglottis, close the larynx, |
| and open the PES. The HLC is fully elevated |
| when the hyoid bone is seen at the level of the |
| inferior margin of the mandible. Slow or incom |
| plete elevation of the HLC is due to weakness of |
| the suprahyoid muscles and pharyngeal elevators |
| (Fig 7). Muscular weakness is a consequence of |
| atrophy and fibrosis secondary to aging, radia |
| tion, and neurologic or cerebrovascular diseases |
| (14). |
|
|
| Weakness of Tongue and Pharyngeal |
| Contraction |
| Adequate thrust of the dorsum of the tongue |
| and the pharyngeal walls is required to increase |
| intrabolus pressure and propel the bolus into the |
|
|
| Figure 9. Hypotony of the left |
| pharyngeal wall in a 59-year-old |
| woman. Frontal radiograph of the |
| pharynx during swallowing shows |
| bulging of the left pharyngeal wall |
| (arrowhead) and an asymmetric |
| tilt of the epiglottis (arrow). Find- |
| ings were due to a nerve injury |
| during surgery for resection of a |
| tumor in the base of the skull. |
|
|
| esophagus. Unilateral or bilateral weakness or |
| atrophy of the muscles may prevent a timely and |
| complete bolus displacement. In severe cases |
| of atony, as with a “frozen pharynx,” the bolus |
| mostly moves by means of gravity (Fig 8). Lack |
| of appropriate contraction leaves residue in the |
| pharynx after swallowing and increases the risk |
| of aspiration. Reduced pharyngeal contraction |
| may be caused by muscular or neurologic dam |
| age due to radiation, surgery, or neurovascular |
| diseases. Weakness can be bilateral or unilateral |
| (Fig 9) (7,10,14,15). |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1739 |
|
|
| push the bolus and a distal relaxation to al |
| low its passage. At fluoroscopy, abnormalities |
| of pharyngeal peristalsis are recognized by |
| the presence of nonpropulsive contractions |
| that interrupt bolus passage and fragment the |
| contrast material in the pharyngeal lumen (Fig |
| 10). Residue left in the pharyngeal lumen after |
| swallowing can lead to aspiration. The paralysis |
| can be bilateral because of injury of the pharyn |
| geal innervation that is secondary to radiation, |
| inflammatory changes, or neurologic diseases |
| or unilateral because of peripheral nerve injury |
| during surgery (7,14). |
|
|
| Limited Tilt of Epiglottis |
| During swallowing, the tilt of the epiglottis pro |
| tects the entrance of the laryngeal vestibule and |
| deflects the bolus into the lateral food pathways |
| (pyriform sinuses). As a consequence, an insuf |
| ficient or absent epiglottic tilt may obstruct the |
| passage of the bolus and risk penetration of |
| material into the laryngeal inlet during swallow |
| ing (Fig 11). Causes of inadequate epiglottic tilt |
| include insufficient displacement of the HLC, |
| pharyngeal or laryngeal tumors, or fibrosis due to |
| radiation (7,14). |
|
|
| Delayed or Incomplete Laryngeal Closure |
| Laryngeal closure starts with and continues as |
| HLC displacement. It starts in an inferior to |
| superior direction, beginning in the true vocal |
| folds, followed by the false vocal folds, and end |
| ing in the laryngeal vestibule to expel penetrated |
| material back into the hypopharynx. Closure of |
| the laryngeal vestibule is recognized at fluoros |
| copy as the narrowing and disappearance of the |
| air column in the laryngeal lumen during the |
| HLC elevation. A delayed, slow, or incomplete |
| closure of the larynx during swallowing may lead |
| to aspiration (Fig 12). Failure of laryngeal closure |
| may result from insufficient HLC elevation, cer |
| vical surgery, laryngeal fibrosis due to radiation, |
| or weakness of the supraglottic adductors due to |
| edema or fibrosis (14,17). |
|
|
| Incomplete Opening of PES |
| The UES is a highpressure zone at the PES that |
| is formed by muscular fibers of the thyropharyn |
| geus, cricopharyngeus (CP), and circular fibers |
| of the proximal esophagus. The PES is normally |
| closed to prevent inhaled air from passing into the |
| esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux from enter |
| ing into the airway. It opens during swallowing to |
| allow passage of the bolus, vomiting, or eructation. |
| Opening the PES involves (a) neural relaxation of |
| the tonically contracted UES muscles, (b) normal |
| distensibility of the segment, (c) traction forces |
| imparted by the opening of the UES muscles, and |
|
|
| Figure 10. Nonpropulsive pharyngeal contrac- |
| tions in a 66-year-old man. Lateral radiograph of |
| the pharynx during swallowing shows narrowing |
| of the pharyngeal lumen (arrowheads) when the |
| hyoid bone is still elevated (blue arrow). Because |
| of premature pharyngeal closure, some contrast |
| material was trapped in the oropharynx (*) and |
| penetrated the laryngeal vestibule (red arrow). |
| |
| Incomplete epi- |
| Figure 11. |
| glottis tilt in a 72-year-old man. |
| Lateral radiograph shows a |
| swelling epiglottis in upward |
| position during the bolus pas- |
| sage (arrow). As a consequence |
| of the insufficient tilt of the epi- |
| glottis, a partial obstruction of |
| bolus displacement and pen- |
| etration of contrast material |
| into the laryngeal vestibule (*) |
| are visible. |
|
|
| Figure 12. |
| Insufficient closure |
| of the laryngeal lumen during |
| swallowing in a 69-year-old |
| woman. Lateral radiograph of |
| the pharynx during swallow- |
| ing shows an opened laryngeal |
| vestibule with penetration of |
| contrast material. Additional |
| findings are deformity of the |
| epiglottis (*), poor pharyngeal |
| contractions, and a stricture of |
| the PES (arrow) due to chemo- |
| therapy and radiation therapy. |
| |
| Lack of Synchronization of Pharyngeal |
| Contractions |
| Peristalsis is a wavelike involuntary contraction |
| of the gastrointestinal tract with the purpose |
| of transporting the bolus. It consists of strip |
| ping contractions of the proximal muscles to |
| |
| 1740 October Special Issue 2021 |
| |
| radiographics.rsna.org |
| |
| Diagnosis and Treatment of Pharyngoesophageal Segment Dysmotilities |
| |
| PES Dysmotility |
| |
| PES Opening |
| |
| Mechanism |
| |
| Therapeutic Objective |
| |
| Maneuvers |
| |
| Delayed PES opening due |
| to slow HLC displace |
| ment |
| |
| Full opening only |
| |
| when the HLC is |
| completely elevated |
| |
| Delayed PES opening |
| |
| Full opening only |
| |
| Delayed initiation |
| of pharyngeal |
| swallow |
| UES spasm |
| |
| when UES is relaxed |
| |
| Improve speed of swal |
| lowing initiation |
| |
| Bolus stimulation |
| |
| Abbreviate the UES |
| |
| Increase bolus vol |
| |
| relaxation |
| |
| ume and thickness |
| |
| due to impaired UES |
| relaxation |
| |
| Incomplete PES opening |
| due to nonrelaxation of |
| CP (CP achalasia) |
| |
| Incomplete PES opening |
| due to lack of elasticity |
| of the CP (fibrosis) |
| Incomplete PES opening |
| due to partial displace |
| ment of HLC |
| |
| Incomplete PES opening |
| due to weak pharyngeal |
| contraction |
| |
| Early PES closure due to |
| premature HLC return |
| |
| Early PES closure due |
| to premature UES |
| contraction |
| |
| Incomplete |
| |
| CP nonrelaxation |
| |
| Improve CP relaxation Endoscopic dilation |
| Botulinum toxin A |
| |
| Incomplete |
| |
| CP lack of elastic |
| ity (fibrosis) |
| |
| PES dilation |
| |
| Incomplete |
| |
| Weakness of HLC |
| |
| Strengthening of HLC |
| |
| elevators |
| |
| elevators |
| |
| Incomplete |
| |
| Weak pharyngeal |
| muscular con |
| tractions |
| |
| Improvement of pha |
| ryngeal contraction |
| |
| Full opening only |
| |
| Weakness of HLC |
| |
| Increase and extend the |
| |
| when the HLC is |
| completely elevated |
| |
| elevators |
| |
| HLC elevation |
| |
| Full opening only |
| |
| UES spasm |
| |
| Delay the UES con |
| |
| when the UES is |
| relaxed |
| |
| traction |
| |
| injection |
| CP myotomy |
| Effortful swallow |
| Endoscopic dilation |
| CP myotomy |
| Mendelsohn |
| Effortful swallow |
| Shaker |
| Base of tongue exer |
| |
| cises |
| |
| Tongue hold |
| Mendelsohn |
| Increase bolus vol |
| |
| ume and thickness; |
| Mendelsohn |
| Increase bolus vol |
| |
| ume and thickness |
| |
| PES dilation |
| |
| Sources.— References 9,10,14,18–26. |
| |
| (d) intrabolus pressure generated by contraction |
| of the pharynx. |
| |
| Primary causes of incomplete opening of the |
| UES during the passage of the bolus are (a) in |
| complete relaxation of the UES (achalasia) or lack |
| of coordination with the pharyngeal contraction |
| (dyskinesia), (b) abnormal elasticity and dis |
| tensibility of the CP as result of degeneration of |
| muscle fibers and replacement with fibroadipose |
| tissue, (c) noncomplete displacement of the HLC |
| during swallowing, and (d) insufficient intrabolus |
| pressure to open the lumen due to impairment of |
| the tongue and pharyngeal constrictor muscles |
| (Table) (7,9,14,18–26). Narrowing of the PES |
| prevents the free and complete passage of the |
| bolus into the esophagus, resulting in incomplete |
| clearance and residue in the pyriform sinuses, |
| with potentially postdeglutitive aspiration. |
| |
| On a lateral view, the diminished opening of the |
| |
| PES is recognized by a posterior protrusion (CP |
| bar) between C3 and C6 during the transsphinc |
| teric passage of the bolus (Fig 13). For evaluation |
| of the function of the PES, radiologists should |
| correlate the following functional units: (a) the |
| opening of the PES, (b) the elevation of the HLC, |
| and (c) the pharyngeal contraction. Understand |
| ing the different possible mechanisms that cause |
| |
| the abnormal function of the segment is essential |
| in deciding the best treatment strategies. |
| |
| Delayed Opening of PES |
| During swallowing, the PES opens completely |
| upon the arrival of the bolus to allow it to pass |
| into the esophagus. Delayed opening of the PES |
| is a consequence of delayed elevation of the HLC |
| or retarded relaxation of the UES (Table). When |
| the delayed opening is due to slow or retarded |
| relaxation of the UES, the hyoid bone is already |
| elevated when the PES is still closed (Fig 14). |
| Because the PES remains closed on the arrival of |
| the bolus, there is a transient luminal obstruction |
| that augments the pressure and distends the lu |
| men of the proximal pharynx, increasing the risk |
| of aspiration (9,14). |
| |
| Early Closure of PES |
| The PES should only close after the bolus has |
| passed completely into the esophagus. A prema |
| ture closure of the PES can be due to an early |
| contraction of the UES before the HLC returns |
| to resting position and the bolus pass is finished |
| (Fig 15) or a premature return of the HLC to |
| resting position (Fig 16) (Table). An early closure |
| of the PES can block the bolus and leave residue |
| |
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
| |
| Carbo et al 1741 |
| |
| Figure 13. Diminished opening of the PES in |
| a 44-year-old woman with gastroesophageal re- |
| flux. Lateral radiograph of swallowing shows a |
| transverse filling defect in the posterior wall of |
| the PES, called the CP bar (yellow arrow), when |
| the hyolaryngeal complex is fully elevated (blue |
| arrow). The luminal narrowing obstructs the pas- |
| sage of the bolus and distends the proximal pha- |
| ryngeal lumen. |
| |
| Figure 14. Delayed opening |
| of the PES due to retarded relax- |
| ation of the UES in a 71-year-old |
| woman. Lateral radiograph shows |
| the bolus tip at the PES entrance, |
| which remains closed (yellow ar- |
| row), even when the hyoid bone |
| is fully elevated (blue arrow). On |
| subsequent images (not shown), |
| the PES opened completely, allow- |
| ing the full passage of the bolus. |
| |
| Figure 15. Early closure of the PES due to |
| premature closing of the UES in a 62-year- |
| old man. (A) Lateral radiograph shows a |
| normal PES opening during the passage of |
| the bolus. (B) Delayed lateral radiograph |
| shows an early closing of the PES (arrow- |
| heads), while the hyoid bone is still ele- |
| vated (arrow in A and B). The early closure |
| of the PES interrupts the passage of the |
| bolus, leaving residue in the hypopharynx |
| (*), with increased risk of aspiration. |
|
|
| in the pyriform sinuses after swallowing, leading |
| to aspiration when the airway reopens (9,14). |
|
|
| Residue in Valleculae and Pyriform |
| Sinuses after Swallowing |
| After swallowing, no materials or contrast ma |
| terial should remain in the pharyngeal lumen. |
| Residue in the vallecullae, pyriform sinuses, |
| or pharyngeal walls may lead to postswallow |
| ing aspiration when respiration is resumed (Fig |
| 17A–17C). After swallowing, pooling of contrast |
| material in the valleculae can result from impaired |
| backward movement of the dorsum of the tongue |
| or insufficient epiglottic tilt. Residue in the pyri |
| form sinuses may result from impaired pharyngeal |
| contraction, PES dysmotilities, or mechanical |
| obstruction. Unilateral pooling can be secondary |
| to paralysis of the lateral pharyngeal wall due to a |
| nerve or muscle injury (Fig 17D) (14). |
|
|
| Penetration.—No contrast material should |
| penetrate the laryngeal vestibule before, during, |
| or after swallowing. Penetration is diagnosed at |
| fluoroscopy when contrast material is seen in the |
| laryngeal lumen. During swallowing, penetrated |
| material should be extruded back into the phar |
| ynx by laryngeal contraction (ie, flash penetration). |
| In severe cases, contrast material may remain |
| in the laryngeal vestibule, reach the vocal folds, |
| and pass into the trachea. Whenever possible, the |
| mechanism responsible for penetration should be |
| recognized during the examination and stated in |
| the report to allow decision making on the best |
| therapeutic approach. Preswallowing penetrations |
| are usually a consequence of delayed initiation |
| of the swallowing reflex. Penetrations during |
| swallowing can be due to one or multiple abnor |
| malities such as incomplete or slow elevation of |
| the HLC, epiglottis tilt, incomplete closure of the |
|
|
| 1742 October Special Issue 2021 |
|
|
| radiographics.rsna.org |
|
|
| Figure 16. Early closure of the PES due to premature |
| return of the hyolaryngeal complex in a 55-year-old |
| woman. (A) Lateral radiograph shows normal open- |
| ing of the PES during swallowing, with the hyoid bone |
| fully elevated (blue arrow). An incidental finding is a |
| penetration during swallowing (red arrow). (B) De- |
| layed lateral radiograph of the same swallow shows |
| an early closure of the PES (arrowhead) due to a pre- |
| mature return of the HLC, which is evidenced by the |
| low position of the hyoid bone (blue arrow). The early |
| closure of the PES interrupted the complete passage |
| of the bolus and left residue in the hypopharynx (*). |
| |
| Figure 17. Residue in the valleculae and pyriform sinuses after swallowing. (A) Lateral radiograph of the pharynx in a 72-year- |
| old man after swallowing shows contrast material pooling in the valleculae (V) and pyriform sinuses (PS). (B) Frontal radiograph |
| in a 40-year-old man after spinal fixation shows bilateral residue in the valleculae (green arrows) and pyriform sinuses (red arrows). |
| (C) Lateral radiograph in a 67-year-old woman after swallowing shows the penetration of residual contrast material (arrowhead) into |
| the larynx from the pyriform sinuses (*). (D) Frontal radiograph in a 72-year-old man after right-sided skull base surgery shows residue |
| in the right pyriform sinus (arrow) due to unilateral deficiency of the pharyngeal contraction. |
|
|
| laryngeal vestibule, or motility disorders of the |
| pharynx or PES. Pharyngeal residue is respon |
| sible for penetrations after swallowing (14). |
|
|
| Aspiration.—Aspiration is diagnosed when con |
| trast material is seen in the tracheal lumen, below |
| the vocal cords (Fig 18). Aspiration is a more |
| severe complication than penetration and may be |
| minimal, moderate, or massive when the con |
| trast material reaches the carina and bronchus. |
| Aspirated materials in the trachea may generate |
| a protective cough to expel them back into the |
| pharynx or may be nonsensate (ie, silent). A de |
| layed or absent cough reflex is valuable informa |
| tion by which to estimate severity, because silent |
| aspirators have a greater risk of developing pneu |
| monia. In addition to the causes of penetration, |
| a delayed or insufficient closure of the vocal folds |
| due to edema, radiation fibrosis, or surgery of the |
| vocal cord adductors may contribute to aspira |
| tion. Externalbeam radiation treatment for neck |
|
|
| cancer is a frequent cause of aspiration because it |
| may impair all phases of swallowing. |
|
|
| Anatomic Abnormalities |
|
|
| Radiography of the Neck |
| As part of the fluoroscopic swallowing exami |
| nation, a systematic evaluation of the airfilled |
| structures and soft tissues of the neck may |
| provide information about the causative or as |
| sociated abnormalities relating to the patient’s |
| symptoms. The patient should be evaluated for |
| (a) soft palate atrophy due to radiation or sur |
| gery or compensatory hypertrophy due to tongue |
| atrophy (Fig E1); (b) tongue atrophy due to |
| aging, radiation, or surgery (Fig E2); (c) epiglot |
| tis enlargement due to acute radiation (Fig E3), |
| infection, and tumors or atrophy due to radia |
| tion; (d) swelling of prevertebral soft tissues due |
| to chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery (Fig E4) |
| and tumors, abscesses, or hematomas; (e) air |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1743 |
|
|
| Figure 18. Aspiration in a 77-year-old man. |
| Lateral view of swallowing shows contrast ma- |
| terial penetration into the laryngeal vestibule (*) |
| and aspiration into the tracheal lumen (red ar- |
| row) through the vocal folds (white arrows). |
| |
| Figure 19. Web in a 66-year-old |
| woman. Lateral radiograph of the |
| pharynx during swallowing shows a |
| thin horizontal linear filling defect in |
| the anterior wall of the hypopharynx |
| that obstructs the lumen (arrow). |
| |
| Figure 21. Pharyngeal tumor in |
| a 78-year-old man. Swallowing ex- |
| amination shows an irregular lumi- |
| nal narrowing of the pharynx, with |
| posterior displacement due to a large |
| infiltrating mass (arrows). |
| |
| Figure 20. Radiation stricture in |
| a 77-year-old man. Lateral radio- |
| graph of swallowing shows a short |
| severe luminal stricture in the phar- |
| ynx due to scarring (arrow), with a |
| mild proximal luminal distention. |
| |
| in the prevertebral soft tissues due to trauma |
| (Fig E5), gastrointestinal perforations (Fig E6), |
| diverticula (Fig E7), or in other locations as |
| postsurgical leakage (Fig E8); (f) softtissue |
| attenuation obstructive masses in the lumen of |
| pharynx (Fig E9), larynx (Fig E10), or PES (Fig |
| E11); (g) pharyngeal deformities as a nonclosed |
| PES at rest due to fibrosis because of radiation |
| therapy (Fig E12) or esophageal dilations due to |
| achalasia (Fig E13) or scleroderma; (h) abnor |
| mal softtissue calcifications; and (i) bone and |
| postsurgical abnormalities. |
| |
| Pharyngeal Strictures |
| Webs are thin mucosal folds that are frequently |
| seen in the anterior wall or circumference of the |
| hypopharynx or proximal esophagus. Webs are |
| associated with gastroesophageal reflux and syn |
| dromes such as PlummerVinson or epidermolysis |
| ampullosa and are seen as 2–4mmthick trans |
| verse linear filling defects in the hypopharynx and |
| cervical esophagus that may partially obstruct the |
| lumen and passage of the bolus (Fig 19) (27). |
| |
| Radiation strictures are a delayed complication |
| |
| of radiation due to vascular damage, ischemia, |
| and collagen deposition, with subsequent fibrosis |
| and scarring (Fig 20) (27,28). |
| |
| Cervical esophageal tumors can be seen radio |
| graphically as irregular or lobulated filling defects |
| protruding into the lumen of the pharynx or |
| larynx on radiographs or swallowing examina |
| tions (Fig 21) (27). Cervical tumors are more ac |
| curately detected and staged with crosssectional |
| imaging such as CT, MRI, or PET. |
| |
| 1744 October Special Issue 2021 |
| |
| radiographics.rsna.org |
| |
| Figure 22. Zenker diverticulum in two patients. (A) Illustration shows a diverticulum (green arrow) |
| emerging from a triangular-shaped area in the posterior wall of the hypopharynx (blue and yellow ar- |
| rows), which was formed superiorly by the oblique fibers of the thyropharyngeus and inferiorly by hori- |
| zontal fibers of the cricopharyngeus. (B) Lateral radiograph during swallowing in a 74-year-old woman |
| shows a diverticulum in the posterior wall of the hypopharynx (red-orange arrow) above the CP bar |
| (yellow arrow). (C) Frontal radiograph in a 79-year-old man after swallowing contrast material shows |
| the diverticulum mildly displaced to the left side of the patient (*) and residue in both pyriform sinuses |
| (arrows). |
|
|
| Zenker Diverticula |
| Zenker diverticula are outpouchings lined by squa |
| mous epithelial mucosa and submucosa and are |
| often surrounded by fibrous tissue, with absent |
| muscular fibers. They are located in an area of |
| muscular weakness called the Killian dehiscence |
| or the triangle of Laennec in the posterior wall of |
| the hypopharynx and are limited by the oblique |
| fibers of the thyropharyngeous superiorly and |
| laterally and by the horizontal fibers of the CP |
| inferiorly (Fig 22A). |
|
|
| The development of Zenker diverticula may |
| involve anatomic and pathophysiologic causes that |
| include an area of wall weakness, a distal obstruc |
| tion due to the diminished opening of the CP, |
| and increased pharyngeal intraluminal pressure as |
| a consequence of mechanical obstruction of the |
| outlet. Strong evidence now shows that acquired |
| Zenker diverticula are, in most cases, second |
| ary to a poorly compliant but normally relax |
| ing CP muscle that cannot fully distend during |
| the process of sphincter opening. The increased |
| resistance to flow during swallowing in an attempt |
| to overcome the distal obstruction markedly in |
| creases the forces required to drive the passage of |
| the bolus. Increased intrabolus pressure imparted |
| to the area of relative muscular weakness (Killian |
| dehiscence) over many years gives rise to a poste |
| rior herniation of the pouch (27,29,30). |
|
|
| Fluoroscopically, the diverticulum is seen |
| during and after swallowing as an outpouching |
|
|
| arising from the posterior hypopharyngeal wall |
| above the prominence of the CP bar (Fig 22B). |
| In frontal views, a small diverticulum is seen in |
| the midline, but when it becomes larger, it may |
| relocate laterally, more frequently to the left side |
| (Fig 22C). After swallowing, the content of the |
| diverticulum may empty back into the hypo |
| pharynx, increasing the risk of postswallowing |
| aspiration. |
|
|
| Pseudo-Zenker diverticula are saclike collections |
| of contrast material that are trapped in the same |
| location as that of the Zenker diverticula (27). |
| They are seen only after swallowing when the |
| pharyngeal lumen is collapsed and not when the |
| lumen is fully distended (Fig 23). |
|
|
| Killian-Jamieson Diverticula |
| Killian-Jamieson diverticula are outpouchings from |
| the anterior lateral wall of the cervical esophagus |
| through a gap between the inferior margin of the |
| cricoid cartilage and CP and the lateral wall of |
| the suspensory ligament of the esophagus (Fig |
| 24A) (27). They are seen during swallowing stud |
| ies as lateral or anterior outpouchings below the |
| level of the CP (Fig 24B). |
|
|
| Complications of Total Laryngectomy |
|
|
| Surgical Technique |
| Total laryngectomy is indicated for advanced or |
| nonradiosensitive laryngeal or cervical tumors. |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1745 |
|
|
| Figure 23. Pseudo-Zenker diverticulum in a |
| 69-year-old woman. Lateral radiograph of the |
| pharynx after swallowing shows an outpouching |
| in the location of the Zenker diverticula (arrow). |
| The outpouching was not identified when the |
| pharyngeal lumen was fully distended during the |
| passage of the bolus (not shown). |
|
|
| Figure 24. Killian-Jamieson diverticulum in a 72-year-old |
| man. (A) Illustration shows a diverticulum emerging from the |
| anterolateral wall of the cervical esophagus (arrow) below the |
| CP muscle. (B) Frontal radiograph during swallowing shows a |
| right lateral diverticulum (arrow). |
|
|
| The surgical technique consists of removal of the |
| hyoid bone, thyroid and cricoid cartilages, epiglot |
| tis, and vocal folds (Fig 25A), followed by recon |
| struction and closure of the anterior defect with |
| mucosa, pharyngeal muscles, and skin (Fig 25B). |
| Finally, optional vocal restoration can be achieved |
| through creation of a fistula between the trache |
| ostoma and the esophagus, with placement of a |
| silastic prosthesis of varying length and diameter |
| in the fistula to allow the oneway passage of air |
| for speech rehabilitation (Fig 25C). In patients |
| with the tracheoesophageal fistula, the evaluation |
| of prosthesis position and function and PES motil |
| ity during phonation should be included as part of |
| the swallowing evaluation (31–33). |
|
|
| Anastomotic Leakage |
| Anastomotic leakage is a frequent complication |
| in the early postoperative period. Risk factors |
| include oral infection, salvage total laryngec |
| tomy, and prior radiation therapy. Leakages are |
| detected at a swallowing examination as blind |
| outpouchings outside the neopharyngeal lumen |
| (sinus tracts) or as an extraluminal tract of con |
| trast material that communicates with the skin |
| (Fig 26) (27,34,35). |
|
|
| Pseudoepiglottis |
| A pseudoepiglottis is an enlargement of the folds at |
| the base of the tongue due to the pull of pharyn |
| geal constrictors when a patient attempts to swal |
| low. The abnormality is seen as an anterior linear |
| defect at the base of tongue and the entrance of |
|
|
| neopharynx that resembles an epiglottis (Fig 27). |
| The fold is more prominent when the patient |
| swallows and may narrow the entrance of the |
| neopharynx and obstruct the bolus transit from |
| the mouth. Increased intrabolus pressure proxi |
| mal to the obstruction contributes to the forma |
| tion of a proximal pocket, where residue and food |
| may accumulate (27). |
|
|
| Anterior Pharyngeal Pouches |
| Anterior pharyngeal pouches are pockets or out |
| pouchings located at the anterior wall between |
| the base of tongue and the neopharynx entrance. |
| The mechanism of formation is multifactorial, |
| including a localized weakness due to absence |
| of a muscular layer and/or increased intrabolus |
| pressure against a more distal mechanical or |
| functional obstruction. Radiologic images show |
| an anterior outpouching at the entrance of the |
| neopharynx with contrast material pooling after |
| the swallow (Fig 28). If the pouch enlarges con |
| siderably, it may extend into the skin, creating a |
| pharyngocutaneous fistula (36). |
|
|
| Neopharyngeal Dysmotilities |
| Neopharyngeal dysmotilities may be secondary to |
| resection of the laryngeal and pharyngeal struc |
| tures that support the tongue and pharyngeal |
| muscles and/or due to damage of the pharyngeal |
| muscles and nerves by the tumor, surgery, or |
| radiation therapy. Dysmotilities are seen on im |
| ages from swallowing studies as a limited thrust |
| of the base of tongue and/or pharyngeal walls, |
|
|
| 1746 October Special Issue 2021 |
|
|
| radiographics.rsna.org |
|
|
| Figure 25. Surgical technique for laryngectomy. (A) Illus- |
| tration shows the anatomic structures that will be removed |
| as the hyoid bone, epiglottis, thyroid cartilage including the |
| vocal folds, cricoid cartilage, and first tracheal ring. (B) Illus- |
| tration shows the closure of the anterior wall with mucosa, |
| muscles, and skin for the reconstruction of the neopharynx. |
| (C) Illustration shows the creation of a tracheoesophageal |
| fistula, with placement of a one-way prosthesis (arrow) for |
| voice reconstitution. |
|
|
| with weakening of the pharyngeal propulsion, |
| impaired coordination of peristalsis, reversed |
| peristalsis, and outflow resistance across the |
| PES (Fig 29). Because of neopharyngeal dys |
| motility, bolus transit time is prolonged, and |
| pharyngeal clearance is incomplete, with stasis |
| and residue (27,36). |
|
|
| total |
|
|
| Figure 26. Sinus tract in |
| a 78-year-old man. Lateral |
| radiograph of swallowing |
| after |
| laryngectomy |
| shows a leakage from the |
| proximal neopharynx into |
| the anterior soft tissues of |
| the neck (arrow). |
|
|
| Dysfunctions of PES |
| Dysfunctions of the PES should be evaluated |
| during and after swallowing during voice gen |
| eration. Fluoroscopically, they are seen as an |
| insufficient or delayed opening or early closing |
| of the PES (Fig 30). These findings may be a |
| consequence of impaired pharyngeal propul |
| sion or increased resistance at the bolus passage |
| through the PES due to resection of the cri |
| coid cartilage or fibrosis secondary to radiation |
| therapy (27,36). |
|
|
| Benign Strictures |
| Benign strictures of the neopharyngeal lumen are |
| secondary to surgical scarring and/or chemo |
|
|
| therapy and radiation therapy. The strictures may |
| partially or completely obstruct the bolus flow, |
| distending the proximal lumen and retaining ma |
| terial the patient swallows (Fig 31) (37). |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1747 |
|
|
| Figure 27. Pseudoepiglot- |
| tis in a 78-year-old man who |
| underwent a total laryngec- |
| tomy. Lateral radiograph dur- |
| ing swallowing shows a linear |
| horizontal filling defect in the |
| anterior wall of the proximal |
| neopharynx that resembles |
| the epiglottis and partially |
| obstructs the passage of the |
| bolus (arrow). |
|
|
| Figure |
| 28. Anterior |
| pharyngeal pouch in a |
| 72-year-old woman. Lat- |
| eral radiograph shows |
| contrast material pooling |
| in an outpouching at the |
| base of the tongue at the |
| entrance of the neophar- |
| ynx (*). |
| |
| Figure 29. Neopharyngeal dysmotility in a 70-year-old man. Se- |
| quential lateral radiographs of swallowing show a premature clo- |
| sure of the neopharynx during the passage of the bolus (arrows in |
| B), with residue in the proximal lumen. |
| |
| Figure 30. PES dysmotility in a |
| 72-year-old woman. Lateral radio- |
| graph of swallowing shows PES |
| narrowing during the passage of |
| the bolus (arrow). |
| |
| Complications of Tracheoesophageal |
| Fistula and Prosthesis |
| A malpositioned or a toolarge prosthesis may |
| protrude into the lumen of the tracheostoma and |
| obstruct it (Fig 32A). When the prosthetic flange |
| is located in the esophageal lumen instead of being |
| attached to the wall, the flange may cause obstruc |
| tion and interference in the passage of the bolus |
| and in phonation (Fig 32B). A tooshort prosthesis |
| may lead to closure of the fistula, with associated |
| inflammatory changes. Esophageal contents can |
| pass around the prosthesis (ie, periprosthetic) and |
| into the tracheostoma during swallowing, because |
| the diameter of the prosthesis is too narrow com |
| pared with that of the stoma (Fig 32C) or through |
| the prosthesis because of malfunction (Fig 32D). |
| The prosthesis should be removed and replaced |
| after diagnosis of these complications (38–41). |
| |
| Conclusion |
| Swallowing is a complex mechanism that involves |
| at least 37 pairs of striated muscles, five cranial |
| nerves, and multiple supportive anatomic struc |
| tures that are controlled by the central nervous |
| system (10). As we have discussed in this article, |
| numerous anatomic and functional abnormali |
| ties can impair swallowing and can be detected at |
| fluoroscopy. |
| |
| The presence or supervision of a radiologist |
| during the examination may contribute to cor |
| relation of the perceived abnormalities with the |
| patient’s symptoms and prior treatments and |
| imaging studies. On the basis of this preliminary |
| analysis, the radiologist can decide, in conjunc |
| tion with the speechlanguage pathologist, if ad |
| ditional images or structures should be included |
| in the examination before the patient leaves the |
| radiography department. |
| |
| 1748 October Special Issue 2021 |
| |
| radiographics.rsna.org |
| |
| Figure 31. Postradiation stric- |
| ture in a 75-year-old man. Lateral |
| radiograph of swallowing after |
| total laryngectomy shows a stric- |
| ture in the neopharynx (arrows), |
| with proximal pharyngeal dilata- |
| tion (*). |
|
|
| Figure 32. Complications of a tracheoesophageal prosthesis in four patients. (A) Oblique radiograph of swallowing in an 81-year- |
| old woman shows migration of the prosthesis (red arrows) into the lumen of the tracheostoma (green double-headed arrow). |
| (B) Oblique radiograph in a 74-year-old man after swallowing shows the esophageal flange of the prosthesis (arrows), which is |
| malpositioned in the lumen of the proximal esophagus instead of being attached to the wall. (C) Oblique radiograph in a 79-year- |
| old patient after swallowing shows contrast material leaking from the esophagus into the tracheal lumen through the surrounding |
| cephalad margin of the prosthesis (arrows). (D) Oblique radiograph in a 72-year-old man shows contrast material dripping into the |
| trachea through the lumen of prosthesis (arrow). |
|
|
| The radiologic report should include all de |
| tected abnormalities and should not be limited to |
| description of the visualization of penetration or |
| aspiration. Because each abnormality has its own |
| specific therapeutic approach, the description |
| of radiologic findings and their correlation with |
| the pathophysiologic mechanisms and possible |
| causes should be stated clearly in the report. A |
| meticulous radiologic diagnosis facilitates the |
| decision making of referring physicians and swal |
| lowing therapists. |
|
|
| Information obtained from swallowing exami |
| nations is useful to determine the oral capabilities |
| of the patient and whether they should initiate, |
| maintain, or discontinue oral intake without risk |
| ing development of pneumonia. A goodquality |
| examination and report not only improve early |
| diagnosis and treatment of a patient’s swallowing |
| disorders but also reduce morbidity, mortality, |
| length of hospital stay, and health care costs. |
|
|
| Acknowledgment.—The authors wish to acknowledge Lory |
| Tubbs, MA, for her contribution with the illustrations. |
|
|
| References |
|
|
| 1. Allen J, Belafsky P. Symptom indices for dysphagia assess |
| ment and management. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, Postma |
| GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition: a multidis |
| ciplinary text for swallowing and its disorders. New York, |
| NY: Springer Science Business Media, 2013; 357–379. |
| 2. Logeman JA. Instrumental techniques for the study of swal |
| lowing. In: Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders: |
| imaging studies. 2nd ed. Austin, Tex: Proed, 1998; 54–61. |
| 3. Rubesin SE. Pharyngeal morphology. In: Ekberg O, ed. |
| Dysphagia. Diagnosis and treatment. 2nd ed. Cham, Swit |
| zerland: Springer International, 2019; 351–384. |
|
|
| 4. Ekberg O, Nylander G. Anatomy and physiology. In: Ekberg |
| O, ed. Dysphagia. Diagnosis and treatment. 2nd ed. Cham, |
| Switzerland: Springer, 2019; 3–20. |
|
|
| 5. Logeman JA. Anatomy and physiology of normal deglutition. |
| In: Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd |
| ed. Austin, Tex: Proed, 1998; 13–52. |
|
|
| 6. Belafsky PC, Lintzenich CR. Development, Anatomy, |
| and Physiology of the Pharynx. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, |
| Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition: a |
| multidisciplinary text of swallowing and its disorders. New |
| York, NY: Springer, 2013; 165–173. |
|
|
| 7. Jones B. Abnormalities of pharyngeal function. In: Gore RM, |
| Levine MS, eds. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology. |
| 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SaundersElsevier, 2014; 222–236. |
| 8. Matsuo K, Palmer JB. Oral phase preparation and pro |
| pulsion: anatomy, physiology, rheology, mastication, and |
| transport. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, Postma GN, Easterling |
|
|
| RG • Volume 41 Number 6 |
|
|
| Carbo et al 1749 |
|
|
| C, eds. Principles of deglutition. A multidisciplinary text |
| of swallowing and its disorders. New York, NY: Springer, |
| 2013; 117–132. |
|
|
| 9. Lang IM. Development, anatomy and physiology of the |
| upper esophageal sphincter and pharyngoesophageal junc |
| tion. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, Postma GN, Easterling C, |
| eds. Principles of deglutition: a multidisciplinary text for |
| swallowing and its disorders. New York, NY: Springer, |
| 2013; 235–255. |
|
|
| 10. Rubesin SE. Principles of performing a “modified barium |
| swallow” examination. In: RSNA Categorical Course in |
| Diagnostic Radiology: Gastrointestinal. Oak Brook, Ill: |
| Radiological Society of North America, 1997; 7–19. |
| 11. Logeman JA. Evaluation of swallowing disorders. In: Evalu |
| ation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, |
| Tex: Proed, 1998; 168–190. |
|
|
| 12. Rubesin SE. Pharynx: normal anatomy and examination |
| techniques. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds. Textbook |
| of Gastrointestinal radiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: |
| SaundersElsevier, 2014; 207–221. |
|
|
| 13. Skucas J. Imging contrast agents. In: Gore RM, Levine |
| MS, eds. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology. 3rd ed. |
| Philadelphia, Pa: SaundersElsevier, 2008; 3–17. |
|
|
| 14. Logeman JA. Disorders of deglutition. In: Evaluation and |
| treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, Tex: |
| Proed, 1998; 71–119. |
|
|
| 15. Pokieser P, Scharitzer M. The clinical and radiological |
| approach to dysphagia. In: Ekberg O, ed. Dysphagia. Diag |
| nosis and treatment. 2nd ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer |
| International, 2019; 285–315. |
|
|
| 16. Buchholz DW, Bosma JF, Donner MW. Adaptation, com |
| pensation, and decompensation of the pharyngeal swallow. |
| Gastrointest Radiol 1985;10(3):235–239. |
|
|
| 17. Lazarus C. Dysphagia Secondary to the Effects of Chemo |
| therapy and Radiation therapy. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, |
| Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition. A |
| multidisciplinary text of swallowing and its disorders. New |
| York, NY: Springer, 2013; 431–444. |
|
|
| 18. Dantas RO. Cricopharyngeal bar. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, |
| Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition. A |
| multidisciplinary text of swallowing and its disorders. New |
| York, NY: Springer, 2013; 509–514. |
|
|
| 19. Massey BT. Crocopharyngeal achalasia. In: Shaker R, |
| Belafsky P, Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of |
| deglutition. A multidisciplinary text of swallowing and its |
| disorders. New York, NY: Springer, 2013; 515–528. |
| 20. Easterling C, Shaker R. Upper esophageal sphincter opening |
| muscle dysfunction. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, Postma GN, |
| Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition. A multidisci |
| plinary text of swallowing and its disorders. New York, NY: |
| Springer, 2013; 529–538. |
|
|
| 21. Mei L, Sanvanson P. Upper esophageal sphincter restrictive |
| disorders. In: Bardan E, Shaker R, eds. Gastrointestinal mo |
| tility disorders. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018; 79–907. |
| 22. Lazarus CL, Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, et al. Swallow |
| ing disorders in head and neck cancer patients treated with |
| radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Laryngoscope |
| 1996;106(9 Pt 1):1157–1166. |
|
|
| 23. Born LJ, Harned RH, Rikkers LF, Pfeiffer RF, Quigley |
| EM. Cricopharyngeal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: |
| role in dysphagia and response to myotomy. Mov Disord |
| 1996;11(1):53–58. |
|
|
| 24. Theurer JA, Johnston JL, Taves DH, et al. Swallowing after |
| right hemisphere stroke: oral versus pharyngeal deficits. Can |
| J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2008;32:114–122. |
|
|
| 25. Lazarus C, Logemann JA. Swallowing disorders in |
| closed head trauma patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil |
| 1987;68(2):79–84. |
|
|
| 26. McCullough GH, Kim Y. Effects of the Mendelsohn |
| maneuver on extent of hyoid movement and UES opening |
| poststroke. Dysphagia 2013;28(4):511–519. |
|
|
| 27. Rubesin SE. Structural abnormalities of the pharynx. In: |
| Gore RM, Levine MS, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal |
| radiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SaundersElsevier, |
| 2014; 235–265. |
|
|
| 28. Lazarus C. Dysphagia secondary to the effects of chemo |
| therapy and radiation therapy. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, |
| Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition: a |
| multidisciplinary text for swallowing and its disorders. New |
| York, NY: Springer Science Business Media, 2013; 431–443. |
| 29. Cook IJ. Zenker’s diverticulum. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, |
| Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of deglutition: a |
| multidisciplinary text for swallowing and its disorders. New |
| York, NY: Springer Science Business Media, 2013; 495–508. |
| 30. Morrison MP, Postma GN. Surgical treatment of Zenker’s |
| diverticulum. In: Shaker R, Belafsky P, Postma GN, Easter |
| ling C, eds. Principles of deglutition: a multidisciplinary text |
| for swallowing and its disorders. New York, NY: Springer |
| Science Business Media, 2013; 847–858. |
|
|
| 31. Agrawal N, Goldenberg D. Primary and salvage total laryngec |
| tomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2008;41(4):771–780, vii. |
| 32. Schindler A, Mozzanic F, Barbiera F. Dysphagia evaluation |
| and treatment after head and neck surgery and/or chemo |
| radiotherapy of head and neck malignancy. In: Shaker R, |
| Belafsky P, Postma GN, Easterling C, eds. Principles of |
| deglutition: a multidisciplinary text for swallowing and |
| its disorders. New York, NY: Springer Science Business |
| Media, 2013; 649–668. |
|
|
| 33. Giannitto C, Preda L, Zurlo V, et al. Swallowing disorders |
| after oral cavity and pharyngolaryngeal surgery and role |
| of imaging. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017;2017:7592034. |
| 34. Wippold FJ II. Postoperative pharynx. In: Gore RM, Levine |
| MS, eds. In: Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 3rd |
| ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SaundersElsevier, 2008; 257–271. |
| 35. Balfe DM, Koehler RE, Setzen M, Weyman PJ, Baron RL, |
| Ogura JH. Barium examination of the esophagus after total |
| laryngectomy. Radiology 1982;143(2):501–508. |
|
|
| 36. Anderson S, Hogan D, Panizza B. Causes and consequences |
| of anterior pharyngeal pouch after total laryngectomy. J |
| Laryngol Otol 2014;128(Suppl 2):S39–S42. |
|
|
| 37. Nguyen NP, Smith HJ, Sallah S. Evaluation and manage |
| ment of swallowing dysfunction following chemoradiation |
| for head and neck cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head |
| Neck Surg 2007;15(2):130–133. |
|
|
| 38. Logemann JA. Swallowing disorders after treatment of oral |
| and oropharyngeal cancer. In: Evaluation and treatment of |
| swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, Tex: ProEd, 1998; |
| 251–278. |
|
|
| 39. Pope TL, Shaffer HA Jr, Johns ME, et al. Radiologic evalu |
| ation of the BlomSinger prosthesis for vocal restoration |
| after laryngectomy. Presented at the Annual Meeting of |
| the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, Los |
| Angeles, CA, May 1981. |
|
|
| 40. Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Logemann JA, Colangelo |
| LA. Speech and swallowing in irradiated and nonirradiated |
| postsurgical oral cancer patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck |
| Surg 1998;118(5):616–624. |
|
|
| 41. Zhang T, Szczesniak M, Maclean J, et al. Biomechanics of |
| pharyngeal deglutitive function following total laryngectomy. |
| Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;155(2):295–302. |
|
|
| This journal-based SA-CME activity has been approved for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM. See rsna.org/learning-center-rg. |
|
|
|
|