| | | Why | Does | | Reinforcement | | Learning | Generalize? | | A Feature-Level | | | | |
| | --- | ----------- | ---- | --- | ------------- | --- | ---------------- | ----------- | ----- | --------------- | ------ | --- | --- | |
| | | Mechanistic | | | Study | | of Post-Training | in | Large | Language | Models | | | |
| DanShi1,ZhuowenHan1,SimonOstermann2,3,RenrenJin1, |
| JosefvanGenabith2,3,DeyiXiong1* |
| 1TJUNLPLab,SchoolofComputerScienceandTechnology,TianjinUniversity,China |
| 2GermanResearchCenterforArtificialIntelligence(DFKI),Saarbrücken,Germany |
| 3SaarlandUniversity,Saarbrücken,Germany |
| | | | | | | {shidan, | dyxiong}@tju.edu.cn | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ------------- | --- | -------- | --- | ---------- | ------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------ | --- | --------------------- | ---------- | --- | |
| | | | | Abstract | | | | performance | improvements | | on tasks | far beyond | | |
| | | | | | | | | theirtrainingdistribution. | | | Incontrast,supervised | | | |
| | | Reinforcement | | learning | | (RL)-based | post- | | | | | | | |
| 6202 rpA 72 ]LC.sc[ 1v11052.4062:viXra |
| fine-tuning(SFT)isfrequentlyobservedtoinduce |
| | | training | often | improves | the | reasoning | perfor- | | | | | | | |
| | --- | -------- | ----- | -------- | --- | --------- | ------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| mance of large language models (LLMs) be- degradation or forgetting of previously acquired |
| | | | | | | | | general-purpose | | capabilities | (Huan | et al., | 2025; | |
| | --- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------- | ----- | ---------- | --------------- | --- | ------------ | ----- | ------- | ----- | |
| | | yond | the training | | domain, | while | supervised | | | | | | | |
| | | fine-tuning(SFT)frequentlyleadstogeneral | | | | | | Chuetal.,2025). | | | | | | |
| | | capabilities | | forgetting. | However, | | the mecha- | | | | | | | |
| Despitetheseconsistentempiricalfindings,why |
| nismsunderlyingthiscontrastremainunclear. RL-tuned models can generalize well remains |
| Tobridgethisgap,wepresentafeature-level |
| | | | | | | | | poorlyunderstood. | | UnlikeSFT,whichdistillsfull | | | | |
| | --- | ----------------- | --- | -------- | ----------- | ---------- | -------- | ----------------- | ------------ | --------------------------- | --------- | ------ | --- | |
| | | mechanistic | | analysis | methodology | | to probe | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | reasoning | trajectories | from | a teacher | model, | RL | |
| | | RL generalization | | | using a | controlled | experi- | | | | | | | |
| mentalsetup,whereRL-andSFT-tunedmod- typicallyreliesonlyonoutcome-levelsupervision. |
| Fromamechanisticperspective,itisunclearhow |
| | | els are | trained | from | the same | base | model on | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ------- | ------- | ---- | -------- | ---- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| identical data. Leveraging our interpretabil- suchweakandindirectsignalsyieldbroad,trans- |
| | | ity framework, | | we | align | internal | activations | | | | | | | |
| | --- | -------------- | --- | --- | ----- | -------- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| ferableimprovementsacrossdiversetasks. |
| across models within a shared feature space In this work, we address this gap through a |
| andanalyzehowfeaturesevolveduringpost- |
| feature-levelinterpretabilityframeworkdesigned |
| | | training. | WefindthatSFTrapidlyintroduces | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | --- | --------- | ------------------------------ | ----------- | --- | -------- | ----------- | -------------- | --- | --- | --------------------- | --- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | to investigate | how | SFT | and RL differentially | | re- | |
| | | many | highly | specialized | | features | that stabi- | | | | | | | |
| lize early in training, whereas RL induces shape internal representations. We first employ |
| SparseCrosscodertoaligntheinternalactivations |
| morerestrainedandcontinuallyevolvingfea- |
| turechangesthatlargelypreservebasemodels’ of the base model with those of its RL- and SFT- |
| representations. Focusing on samples where tuned counterparts within a shared, interpretable |
| RLsucceedsbutthebasemodelfails,weiden- feature space. This alignment allows us to sys- |
| | | tify a | compact, | task-agnostic | | set | of features | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ------ | -------- | ------------- | --- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| tematicallycompareinternalrepresentationsacross |
| thatdirectlymediategeneralizationacrossdi- |
| modelsandtotrackhowindividualfeaturesemerge, |
| | | verse | tasks. | Feature-level | | interventions | con- | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ----- | ------ | ------------- | --- | ------------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| evolve,anddivergeduringpost-training. |
| | | firm | their causal | | role: disabling | | these fea- | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ---- | ------------ | --- | --------------- | --- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| However,pairwisecomparisonsaloneareinsuf- |
| turessignificantlydegradesRLmodels’gener- |
| alizationperformance,whileamplifyingthem ficientforfullycharacterizingtherelationshipbe- |
| improves base models’ performance. The tweenSFTandRLrepresentations. Toovercome |
| code is available at https://github.com/ this limitation, we then propose a three-model |
| danshi777/RL-generalization. |
| SparseCrosscoderthatjointlyalignsthebase,SFT- |
| 1 Introduction trained, and RL-trained models within a single |
| sparsefeaturespace,andanovelModelAttribution |
| Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a Score(MAS)tomeasurefeaturespecificity. This |
| | powerful | | paradigm | for | enhancing | | the reasoning | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | --- | -------- | --- | --------- | --- | ------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| unifiedrepresentationenablesdirectattributionof |
| capabilitiesoflargelanguagemodels(LLMs),par- |
| eachfeaturetoaspecifictrainingparadigm. |
| ticularlyinsolvingcomplexlogicaltasksinvolving Usingthisframework,weconductasystematic |
| mathematicsandprogramming(Guoetal.,2025; |
| | | | | | | | | analysis | of feature | dynamics | throughout | training. | | |
| | ----- | --- | ---------- | ---- | --- | ----------- | -------- | -------- | ---------- | -------- | ---------- | --------- | --- | |
| | Jaech | et | al., 2024; | Team | et | al., 2025). | Notably, | | | | | | | |
| Ourresultsrevealaclearandconsistentdistinction |
| modelsoptimizedviaRLonnarrowlydefinedrea- between the two paradigms. SFT rapidly intro- |
| | soning | objectives | | often | demonstrate | | substantial | | | | | | | |
| | ------ | ---------- | --- | ----- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| ducesalargenumberofhighlyspecializedfeatures |
| *Correspondingauthor thatstabilizeearlyintraining,whereasRLinduces |
| |
| morerestrainedandcontinuouslyevolvingfeature asaprominentdirection(Daietal.,2022;Shietal., |
| changes,largelypreservingthebasemodel’srep- 2024a;Chenetal.,2024;Wuetal.,2023;Shietal., |
| resentational structure. This difference provides 2024b). Recent work has explored feature-level |
| aninitialrepresentationalexplanationforwhySFT interpretability in LLMs, often using Sparse Au- |
| tendstomemorizetask-specificpatterns,whileRL toencoders(SAEs,Cunninghametal.,2023;Gao |
| maintainsbroadercapabilities. etal.,2024a;Marksetal.,2025)toidentifyinternal |
| Beyond descriptive analysis, our framework features associated with specific functions, such |
| enables direct mechanistic investigation of RL- as emotions (Han et al., 2025), safety behaviors |
| inducedgeneralization. Weidentifyacompactset (Weng et al., 2025; Yeon et al., 2025), language- |
| ofinternalfeaturesthatactivelycontrolcross-task specific representations (Deng et al., 2025), and |
| transfer by focusing on samples where general- reasoningprocesses(Galichinetal.,2025). Sparse |
| ization explicitly occurs, cases in which the RL- Crosscoders extend SAEs, have further enabled |
| tunedmodelsucceedswhilethebasemodelfails, comparisons between fine-tuned and base mod- |
| andmeasuringfeature-levelactivationdifferences els,revealingfeaturesintroducedbySFT(Lindsey |
| withinthealignedfeaturespace. etal.,2024;BaekandTegmark,2025). Incontrast, |
| Throughtargetedfeatureinterventions,wefur- ourworkcomparesbothSFT-andRL-trainedmod- |
| ther demonstrate that these features are causally elsagainstthesamebasemodelandintroducesa |
| responsible for generalization: disabling them in three-model sparse crosscoder to jointly analyze |
| RL-tunedmodelsleadstosignificantperformance theirfeaturedifferences. |
| degradation,whileamplifyingtheminbasemodels |
| Generalization Comparison of SFT and RL. |
| induces substantial gains, even on unseen tasks. |
| Severalstudieshavecomparedthegeneralization |
| These results indicate that RL does not merely |
| of SFT- and RL-tuned models at the behavioral |
| improve task-specific performance, but instead |
| level,documentingperformancegainsandlosses |
| strengthensacompact,task-agnosticsetoffeatures |
| acrossdiversetasks. Theseworksconsistentlyre- |
| thatgovernsgeneralizationbehavior. |
| portthatRL-tunedmodelsgeneralizemorerobustly |
| Insummary,ourcontributionsareasfollows: |
| across domains, while SFT often leads to forget- |
| • We propose a feature-level interpretability tingofgeneralcapabilities(Huanetal.,2025;Chu |
| frameworkformechanisticallyanalyzinghow et al., 2025). However, the internal mechanisms |
| differentpost-trainingparadigmsreshapein- underlyingthiscontrastremainlargelyunexplored. |
| ternalrepresentationsandgiverisetoRLgen- Although Huan et al. (2025) attempt to explain |
| eralization. this difference by relating it to larger representa- |
| tion or output distribution drift induced by SFT, |
| • Wepresentathree-modelSparseCrosscoder |
| theiranalysisremainsatthelevelofglobalrepre- |
| andaModelAttributionScore(MAS)thaten- |
| sentationsanddoesnotidentifythespecificinter- |
| ableunifiedfeaturealignmentandattribution |
| nalmechanismsthatcausallydrivegeneralization. |
| acrossbase,SFT,andRLmodels. |
| Ourworkaddressesthisgapbyprovidingafeature- |
| level,causallyvalidatedexplanationofRL-induced |
| • We reveal a fundamental distinction be- |
| generalization. |
| tweenpost-trainingparadigms: SFTinduces |
| early-stabilized, highly specialized features, |
| 3 InterpretabilityMethodology |
| whereasRLyieldsmorerestrainedandcontin- |
| uouslyevolvingfeaturechanges,andweiden- To systematically analyze how different post- |
| tifyasmallsetofgeneralization-controlling trainingparadigmsreshapeinternalrepresentations, |
| featuresthatprovideadirectmechanisticex- we introduce a unified feature-level interpretabil- |
| planationforRLgeneralization. ityframework. Theframeworkisguidedbythree |
| core principles. First, the models under compari- |
| 2 RelatedWork |
| sonmustbestrictlycomparable,suchthatobserved |
| Feature-Level Interpretability in LLMs. As representationaldifferencescanbeattributedsolely |
| LLMscontinuetoexhibitdiverseandsophisticated to the training paradigm. Second, internal repre- |
| capabilities(Guoetal.,2023;Changetal.,2024; sentationsfromdifferentmodelsmustbealigned |
| Shietal.,2024c),understandingtheinternalmecha- into a shared feature space to enable direct, fine- |
| nismsthatgiverisetothesebehaviorshasemerged grainedcomparisonoffeatures. Third,theframe- |
| |
| workshouldnotonlysupportdescriptiveanalysis sparsityregularizationL : |
| sparsity |
| offeaturedifferences,butalsoprovidedirectevi- |
| L = L +βL , |
| denceforthegeneralizationcapacityofRL. recon sparsity |
| Tosatisfytheseprinciples,wedesignthreekey L = (cid:88) (cid:13) (cid:13)a(i)−aˆ(i) (cid:13) (cid:13) 2 , |
| recon (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| componentsinourinterpretabilityframework: (i) (3) |
| i=O,T |
| sparsecrosscodersforfeature-levelalignmentand L = (cid:88) f (x ) (cid:88) (cid:13) (cid:13)W (i) (cid:13) (cid:13). |
| attributionbetweenthebasemodelandtunedmod- sparsity k j (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| els,(ii)athree-modelextensionthatenablesjoint k i=O,T |
| comparison across base, SFT, and RL models, Thisobjectiveforcesthemodeltolearnasmallset |
| and (iii) a method for identifying generalization- of interpretable features that capture the distinct |
| controllingfeatures. Weintroduceeachcomponent properties of the activations. Within our frame- |
| inturnbelow. work,thistwo-modelsparsecrosscoderservesas |
| thebasicbuildingblockforpairwisecomparison |
| 3.1 Feature-LevelAlignmentandAttribution betweenatunedmodelanditsbasecounterpart. |
| viaSparseCrosscoders |
| IdentifyingModel-SpecificFeatureswithNRN |
| Acentralchallengeincomparinginternalrepresen- Toquantifyhowstronglyeachfeatureisuniqueto |
| tationsacrossindependentlytrainedmodelsisthat eachmodel,wefollowBaekandTegmark(2025) |
| theiractivationspacesarenotdirectlyaligned. To usingtheNormalizedRelativeNorm(NRN)metric |
| address this challenge, we employ Sparse Cross- to analyze the features. NRN is computed as the |
| coders (Lindsey et al., 2024) to align activations ratio between the L1 norm of the decoder vector |
| fromthedifferentmodelsintoasharedsparsefea- foreachmodel: |
| turespace,enablingdirect,meaningfulcomparison |
| (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| ofrepresentationalchangesinducedbytuning. |
| (cid:13)W (T) (cid:13) |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| NRN = (cid:13) (cid:13) (cid:13) 1 (cid:13) , (4) |
| (cid:13)W (O) (cid:13) +(cid:13)W (T) (cid:13) |
| Two-Model Sparse Crosscoder for Compari- (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 1 |
| sonofTunedModelsandBaseModel. Sparse |
| where O denotes the original base model, T rep- |
| CrosscodersextendSAEsbyjointlyencodingac- |
| (·) |
| resents the tuned model (SFT or RL), and W |
| tivationsfromdifferentsources,suchasdifferent dec |
| denotes the corresponding crosscoder’s decoder. |
| models, layers, or positions, into a shared sparse |
| Intuitively,ifafeaturecontributesmoretorecon- |
| feature space. This formulation enables a fine- |
| structingthetunedmodel’sactivations,thedecoder |
| grained comparison of representational changes |
| inducedbytuning. |
| assignsitalargernorminW ( |
| d |
| T |
| ec |
| ) ,yieldingNRN→ |
| 1. Inthiscase,NRN→1correspondstofeatures |
| Formally,theencodercomputesfeatureactiva- |
| thatareuniquetothetunedmodel,NRN→0cor- |
| tionsas: |
| respondstofeaturesuniquetotheoriginalmodel, |
| whileNRN=0.5correspondstosharedfeatures. |
| (cid:88) |
| f(x |
| j |
| ) = ReLU W( |
| e |
| i |
| n |
| ) |
| c |
| a(i)(x |
| j |
| )+b enc, |
| Three-Model Sparse Crosscoder for Joint |
| i∈O,T Representation Comparison. The two-model |
| (1) |
| Sparse Crosscoder enables fine-grained compar- |
| and the decoder reconstructs the activations for |
| isonsbetweenatunedmodelanditsbasecounter- |
| eachmodel: |
| part. However, such pairwise analyses are inher- |
| entlylimitedwhenmultipletrainingparadigmsare |
| aˆ(i)(x ) = W (i) f(x )+b (i) . (2) |
| j dec j dec involved. In particular, when comparing an SFT- |
| tuned model and an RL-tuned model against the |
| Here, O denotes the original base model and T samebasemodel,pairwisecrosscoderscannotdis- |
| represents the tuned model (either SFT or RL). entanglewhetherafeatureissharedbyallmodels, |
| a(i)(x j ) ∈ Rd model is the residual-stream activa- specifictoonetunedmodel,orsharedbythetwo |
| tion of model i at token x j , f(x j ) ∈ Rdsparse is tunedmodelsbutabsentinbasemodel. |
| the sparse feature activations, and aˆ(i)(x ) is the Moreimportantly,featuresidentifiedindifferent |
| j |
| reconstructedactivation. Thecrosscoderistrained pairwisecrosscodersarenotdirectlycomparable. |
| by minimizing a reconstruction loss L with For example, a feature with a given index (e.g., |
| recon |
| |
| (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| feature #2026) in the SFT-Base crosscoder does (cid:13)W(S) (cid:13) |
| MAS = |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 , (9) |
| notnecessarilycorrespondtothefeaturewiththe S (cid:13) (cid:13)W(O) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(S) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(R) (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| same index in the RL-Base crosscoder, since the |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| twocrosscodersaretrainedindependentlyandmay MAS = (cid:13) (cid:13) W( d R ec ) ,k (cid:13) (cid:13) 1 . |
| learnentirelydifferentsparsebases. R (cid:13) (cid:13)W(O) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(S) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(R) (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| Toaddressthislimitation,weintroduceathree- (10) |
| modelSparseCrosscoder,whichjointlyalignsthe Here,O,S,andRdenotetheoriginalbasemodel, |
| base,SFT-tuned,andRL-tunedmodelswithinasin- the SFT-tuned model, and the RL-tuned model, |
| glesparsefeaturespace. Byunifyingallthreemod- respectively. By construction, MAS , MAS , |
| O S |
| els within a single sparse basis, the three-model MAS ∈ [0,1], MAS +MAS +MAS = 1. |
| R O S R |
| sparsecrosscoderconstitutesakeycomponentof ThemodelwiththelargestMASvalueistheoneto |
| ourinterpretabilityframework,enablingdirect,si- whichthefeatureismoststronglyattributed. For |
| multaneouscomparisonoffeaturesharingandspe- example, a feature with MAS → 1 is an SFT- |
| S |
| cializationacrosspost-trainingparadigms. specificfeature. |
| Specifically,givenatokenx ,wejointlyencode |
| j |
| 3.2 IdentifyingGeneralization-Controlling |
| theresidual-streamactivationsfromthethreemod- |
| Features |
| elsintoasharedsparsefeaturerepresentation: |
| Thefinalcomponentofourinterpretabilityframe- |
| (cid:88) workaimstomovebeyonddescriptivecomparison |
| f(x |
| j |
| ) = ReLU W( |
| e |
| i |
| n |
| ) |
| c |
| a(i)(x |
| j |
| )+b enc, |
| andtoidentifyinternalfeaturesthatcausallycon- |
| i=O,S,R |
| trolgeneralizationbehavior. Therefore,wehypoth- |
| (5) |
| esize that RL selectively strengthens a subset of |
| whereO,S,andRdenotetheoriginalbasemodel, |
| featuresthatplayacausalroleinenablinggeneral- |
| theSFT-tunedmodel,andtheRL-tunedmodel,re- |
| spectively. a(i)(x ) represents the activation of izationacrosstasks. |
| j |
| Prior work has attempted to localize function- |
| modeli,andf(x )isthesharedsparsefeaturevec- |
| j |
| ally meaningful features by analyzing which fea- |
| tor. Then,thedecoderreconstructstheactivations |
| tures are frequently activated on specific lexical |
| foreachmodel: |
| cues, such as identifying self-reflection features |
| aˆ(i)(x j ) = W ( d i e ) c f(x j )+b ( d i e ) c . (6) via activations on tokens like “Wait”, or con- |
| trastive features via “But” and “However” (Baek |
| Thetrainingobjectiveminimizesacombination |
| andTegmark,2025;Galichinetal.,2025). While |
| ofreconstructionlossandsparsityregularization: |
| such approaches are useful for interpretability, |
| L = (cid:88) (cid:13) (cid:13)aˆ(i)−a(i) (cid:13) (cid:13) 2 theyimplicitlyassumethatfunctionalfeaturesare |
| (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| tightly coupled to surface-level tokens. In con- |
| i=O,S,R |
| (7) |
| + (cid:88) f (x ) (cid:88) (cid:13) (cid:13)W (i) (cid:13) (cid:13). trast,wethinkthatfeaturescontrollinggeneral- |
| k j (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) izationshouldnotdependonspecificwordsor |
| k i=O,S,R task-specific lexical patterns. Instead, such fea- |
| Thisobjectiveencouragesthemodeltodiscover turesshouldbeidentifiablethroughtheirfunctional |
| acompactsetofsparsefeaturesthatjointlyexplain role,namely,whethertheysystematicallyalterthe |
| theactivationsofallthreemodels,whileallowing model’sdecision-makingbehavioracrosstasksin |
| each feature to contribute unequally to different situationswheregeneralizationactuallyoccurs. |
| models. We propose to localize generalization-related |
| featuresbyfocusingonsamplesthatexplicitlyin- |
| MeasuringFeatureSpecificitywithMAS. To |
| stantiate generalization behavior. For each task, |
| quantifyhowstronglyeachfeatureisattributedto |
| we construct a subset of samples on which the |
| a particular model within the shared crosscoder |
| basemodelfailsbuttheRL-tunedmodelsucceeds. |
| space,wedefineathree-waynormalization,which |
| Thesesamplesrepresenttheminimalevidenceof |
| werefertoastheModelAttributionScore(MAS). |
| generalizationandaretheonlyinstanceswheregen- |
| For each feature k, the formula for calculating |
| eralization can be unambiguously observed. We |
| MASisasfollows: |
| refertothemasgeneralization-criticalsamples. |
| (cid:13) (cid:13) |
| MAS = |
| (cid:13) |
| (cid:13) |
| W( |
| d |
| O |
| ec |
| ) |
| ,k |
| (cid:13) |
| (cid:13) 1 , (8) Foreachgeneralization-criticalsample,weex- |
| O (cid:13) (cid:13)W(O) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(S) (cid:13) (cid:13) + (cid:13) (cid:13)W(R) (cid:13) (cid:13) tractthe residual-streamactivation atthe finalto- |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| (cid:13) dec,k(cid:13) |
| 1 |
| |
| | | | | MathReasoningTasks | | | | | | GeneralTasks | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | ------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Model |
| MATH500 AIME24 AIME25 OpenBookQA CommonsenseQA HeadQA SciQ ARC-Challenge |
| | Qwen3-4B-Base | | | 26.0 | 13.3 | 0.0 | | 23.6 | 20.1 | | 31.7 | 78.5 | 36.0 | | |
| | -------------- | --- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | ---- | ---- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | |
| | Qwen3-4B-SFT | | | 68.4 | 13.3 | 13.3 | | 25.8 | 19.6 | | 31.2 | 51.8 | 34.4 | | |
| | Qwen3-4B-RL | | | 77.0 | 26.7 | 20.0 | | 27.2 | 50.5 | | 32.7 | 89.5 | 39.3 | | |
| | ∆(RL-SFT) | | | 8.6 | 13.4 | 6.7 | | 1.4 | 31.0 | | 1.5 | 37.7 | | 4.9 | |
| | Qwen2.5-7B | | | 40.0 | 10.0 | 3.3 | | 28.4 | 77.6 | | 33.7 | 86.9 | 41.9 | | |
| | Qwen2.5-7B-SFT | | | 69.2 | 13.3 | 10.0 | | 26.4 | 30.1 | | 31.2 | 79.4 | 37.0 | | |
| | Qwen2.5-7B-RL | | | 71.4 | 20.0 | 13.3 | | 32.8 | 76.1 | | 36.1 | 90.7 | 42.5 | | |
| | ∆(RL-SFT) | | | 2.2 | 6.7 | 3.3 | | 6.4 | 46.0 | | 5.0 | 11.3 | | 5.5 | |
| Table1: PerformancecomparisonofSFT-andRL-tunedmodelsonmathreasoningtasksandothertasks. |
| kenpositionfromthebasemodelandtheRL-tuned 2025) and Qwen2.5-7B (Yang et al., 2024) mod- |
| model, respectively. Then we encode them sep- els, respectively. Details about training datasets, |
| arately using the model-specific branches of the implementationspecifics,andhyperparametersare |
| trainedSparseCrosscoderencoder,yieldingfeature providedinAppendixA.2. |
| vectorsf(RL)(x)andf(Base)(x),respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | EvaluationBenchmarks. | | | | WeevaluatedtheSFT- | | | |
| | --- | --------- | --- | ----- | ---------- | -------------- | --- | --------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------ | --- | --- | |
| | For | a feature | | k, we | define its | generalization | | | | | | | | | |
| andRL-tunedmodelsonadiversesuiteofbench- |
| scoreonagiventaskastheaverageactivationdif- |
| marks,spanningbothmathematicalreasoningand |
| ferencebetweentheRLmodelandthebasemodel |
| | | | | | | | | other | general | tasks. | Specifically, | | the mathemat- | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ------- | ------ | ------------- | --- | ------------- | --- | |
| acrossallgeneralization-criticalsamples: |
| | | | | | | | | ical reasoning | | benchmarks | | include | MATH500 | | |
| | ----- | --- | --- | --------- | ----- | ------ | --------- | --------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | ------------- | ---------- | ------- | ------- | |
| | | | | (cid:104) | | | (cid:105) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | E | (RL) | | (Base) | | (Hendrycksetal.,2021),AIME24,andAIME25, | | | | | | | |
| | Score | | = | f | (x)−f | (x) | , (11) | | | | | | | | |
| | | k | x∈G | k | | k | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | while | other | tasks | comprise | OpenBookQA | | (Mi- | |
| | | | | | | | | haylov | et al., | 2018), | CommonsenseQA | | | (Talmor | |
| whereG denotesthesetofgeneralization-critical |
| | | | | | (·) | | | et al., | 2019), | HeadQA | | (Vilares | and | Gómez- | |
| | ----------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------ | --- | --- | ------- | ------ | ------ | --- | -------- | --- | ------ | |
| | samplesforthattask,andf | | | | (x)istheactivation | | | | | | | | | | |
| k |
| | | | | | | | | Rodríguez, | | 2019), | SciQ (Welbl | | et al., 2017), | and | |
| | ------------------------------------- | --- | ----- | -------- | -------- | ----- | --------- | ------------------------------- | --- | ---------- | ----------- | -------------- | -------------- | ------- | |
| | of feature | | k for | input x. | For each | task, | we retain | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | ARC-Challenge(Clarketal.,2018). | | | | | Detailedde- | | |
| | featureswhosescoresexceedathresholdt. | | | | | | These | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | scriptions | of | benchmarks | | and evaluation | | metrics | |
| featuresaretreatedastask-relevantgeneralization |
| canbefoundinAppendixA.4. |
| | features. | | Finally, | we take | the intersection | | of the | | | | | | | | |
| | --------- | --- | -------- | ------- | ---------------- | --- | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| selectedfeaturesetsacrossalltasks,yieldingaset |
| | | | | | | | | Results. | As | shown | in Table | 1, | we observe | that | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | --- | ----- | -------- | --- | ---------- | ---- | |
| offeaturesthatconsistentlycontributetosuccessful |
| | | | | | | | | RL-tuned | models | | exhibit | strong | generalization | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | ------ | --- | ------- | ------ | -------------- | --- | |
| generalizationregardlessoftaskdomain. acrossdiversedomains,whereasSFT-tunedmodels |
| In summary, the features we identify are those sometimessufferfromgeneralcapabilitiesforget- |
| that(i)systematicallydifferentiatetheRLmodel |
| ting,consistentwithobservationsreportedinprior |
| from the base model on generalization-critical work(Huanetal.,2025). |
| | samples, | | (ii) influence | | model behavior | | in a task- | | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | --- | -------------- | --- | -------------- | --- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| agnostic manner, and (iii) do not rely on explicit 5 Experiments: ComparingSFTandRL |
| | taskknowledgeorlexicaltriggers. | | | | | | | ModelsviaTwo-ModelSparse | | | | | | | |
| | ------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Crosscoders |
| | 4 | Phenomena: | | Performance | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ---------- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| DiscrepanciesofReasoningModels ToanalyzehowSFTandRLaltertheinternalrep- |
| resentationsofthebasemodel,weindependently |
| To ensure that differences between the resulting trainedtwoSparseCrosscoders: onebetweenthe |
| | reasoning | | models | can be | attributed | solely | to the | | | | | | | | |
| | --------- | --- | ------ | ------ | ---------- | ------ | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| SFT-tunedmodelandthebasemodel,andanother |
| trainingparadigmratherthanconfoundingfactors betweentheRL-tunedmodelandthebasemodel. |
| such as data composition, we deliberately avoid Implementation and training details are provided |
| | using | existing | off-the-shelf | | distilled | or | RL-tuned | inAppendixA.1. | | | | | | | |
| | ----- | -------- | ------------- | --- | --------- | --- | -------- | -------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| models. Instead,wetrainedboththeSFTandRL |
| 5.1 FeatureDiscrepanciesBetweenRLand |
| modelsfromthesamebasemodelonanidentical |
| SFT |
| datasetusingfull-parametertuning,ensuringthat |
| any observed differences can be attributed solely Using the trained crosscoders, we computed the |
| tothetrainingparadigms. Weperformedthiscon- NRNs for both the SFT- and the RL-tuned mod- |
| trolledtuningontheQwen-3-4B-Base(Yangetal., elsrelativetotheoriginalbasemodel,denotedas |
| |
| | | Qwen3-4B-SFT | | | Qwen3-4B-RL | | | | Qwen2.5-7B-SFT | | | | Qwen2.5-7B-RL | | |
| | ----- | ------------ | --- | ----- | ----------- | --- | --- | ----- | -------------- | --- | ----- | --- | ------------- | --- | |
| | 104 | | | 104 | | | | 104 | | | | 104 | | | |
| | 103 | | | 103 | | | | 103 | | | | 103 | | | |
| | tnuoC | | | tnuoC | | | | tnuoC | | | tnuoC | | | | |
| | 102 | | | 102 | | | | 102 | | | | 102 | | | |
| | 101 | | | 101 | | | | 101 | | | | 101 | | | |
| | 100 | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
| Normalized Relative Norm Normalized Relative Norm Normalized Relative Norm Normalized Relative Norm |
| Figure1: DistributionofNormalizedRelativeNormsacrossdifferenttrainingmethodsanddifferentmodelscales. |
| NRN SFT andNRN RL ,respectively. Theresulting largelypreservestheoriginalmodel’srepresenta- |
| NRNdistributionsarevisualizedinFigure1. tional structure. This pattern can be attributed to |
| Acrossbothtrainingparadigms,themajorityof thenatureofRLsupervision. UnlikeSFT,which |
| featuresclusteraroundNRN≈ 0.5,indicatingthat directlyconstrainstheentirereasoningtrajectory, |
| most features are shared between the fine-tuned RL only provides outcome-level feedback based |
| modelsandthebasemodel. Moreover,thenumber onfinalanswercorrectness. Asaresult,RLdoes |
| offeaturesdecaysapproximatelyexponentiallyto- not force the model to adopt a particular reason- |
| wardbothextremesofthedistribution,suggesting ing style or surface form. Instead, it selectively |
| that highly model-specific features are relatively reinforcesinternalcomputationsthatcontributeto |
| rare. However, thetailsofthedistribution, corre- correctdecisions,whileleavingmuchofthebase |
| spondingtomodel-specificfeatures,exhibitstrik- model’srepresentationalstructureintact. |
| inglydifferentbehaviorsforSFTandRL. Overall, these results suggest a fundamental |
| | | | | | | | | contrast | in post-training | | | dynamics: | SFT | drives | |
| | --- | ------- | ------- | ------ | --------- | --- | ---- | ----------- | ---------------- | --- | --------- | ---------- | --- | ------ | |
| | SFT | Induces | a Large | Number | of Unique | | Fea- | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | substantial | feature | | turnover, | generating | | many | |
| tures. FortheSFT-tunedmodel,theNRNdistri- |
| | | | | | | | | highly | model-specific | | features | while | erasing | oth- | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | -------------- | --- | -------- | ----- | ------- | ---- | |
| butionexhibitsapronouncedrighttail,withasub- ers, whereas RL induces restrained and targeted |
| | stantialnumberoffeaturesachievingNRN | | | | | | > | | | | | | | | |
| | ------------------------------------ | ---- | ---------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | | | | | | SFT | | adjustmentsthatlargelypreservetheoriginalfea- | | | | | | | |
| | 0.8, and | some | even approaching | | NRN | | = 1. | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | SFT | | turespace. | | | | | | | |
| Thesefeaturescorrespondtorepresentationsthat |
| are almost entirely unique to the SFT model. At 5.2 FeatureFormationandEvolutionDuring |
| | the same | time, | we also | observe | a non-negligible | | | | Training | | | | | | |
| | -------- | ----- | ------- | ------- | ---------------- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| numberoffeatureswithNRN → 0,indicating TofurtherunderstandhowSFTandRLalterthein- |
| SFT |
| featuresthatareeffectivelyexclusivetotheorigi- ternalrepresentationsofthebasemodelovertime, |
| | nalmodel. | | ThesetwoextremessuggestthatSFT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | --------- | --- | ------------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| weanalyzedthetemporalevolutionoffeaturesdur- |
| inducesapronouncedrepresentationalshift: while ingtraining. Ratherthanfocusingsolelyonthefi- |
| introducingmanynew,highlyspecializedfeatures, naltunedmodels,weexaminedhowmodel-specific |
| italsosuppressesorabandonsaconsiderablepor- |
| featuresemerge,persist,andchangeacrosstraining |
| tionofthebasemodel’sfeaturerepertoire. |
| checkpoints. |
| | Furthermore, | | the Qwen2.5-7B | | crosscoders | | ex- | | | | | | | | |
| | ------------ | -------- | -------------- | ------------- | ----------- | -------- | --- | ------------ | ------ | --------- | ----------- | ------------ | ---- | -------- | |
| | | | | | | | | Experimental | | Setup. | | For | each | training | |
| | hibit | a larger | number | of features | with | extreme | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | paradigm, | we | saved | checkpoints | | at | regular | |
| | NRN | values | than the | Qwen3-4B-Base | | counter- | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | intervals | (every | one-fifth | | of an epoch) | | and pair | |
| parts,implyingthatlargermodelstendtodevelop |
| | | | | | | | | each | checkpoint | with | the | base model | | to train a | |
| | -------- | --- | -------------- | -------- | -------- | ------ | --- | ------ | ----------- | ---- | -------- | ---------- | ----------- | ---------- | |
| | a richer | set | of distinctive | internal | features | during | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Sparse | Crosscoder, | | yielding | five | crosscoders | per | |
| post-training. |
| | | | | | | | | paradigm. | Thissetupenablesstage-wisecompar- | | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------- | --------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| RLPreservesCoreRepresentationsWhileIntro- isonsbetweenthebasemodelandpartiallytrained |
| ducing Fewer, Milder Deviations. In contrast, models. Using these crosscoders, we conducted |
| theRL-tunedmodelexhibitsamarkedlydifferent twocomplementaryanalyses: (1)featureoverlap |
| NRN profile. Only a small number of features across checkpoints, and (2) feature rank shifts |
| exhibit extreme NRN RL values (close to either 0 betweenconsecutivecheckpoints. Theseanalyses |
| or 1), with very few approaching either end of allow us to quantify both the stability of learned |
| the spectrum. This indicates that RL introduces featuresandtheextenttowhichtheinternalfeature |
| relatively few novel, model-specific features and spaceisreorganizedduringtraining. |
| |
| Qwen3-4B-SFT Qwen3-4B-RL Qwen2.5-7B-SFT Qwen2.5-7B-RL |
| 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 |
| ckpt-1 1.00 0.28 0.22 0.30 0.25 ckpt-1 1.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 ckpt-1 1.00 0.28 0.20 0.30 0.23 ckpt-1 1.00 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.05 |
| 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 |
| ckpt-2 0.28 1.00 0.37 0.33 0.32 ckpt-2 0.06 1.00 0.12 0.10 0.08 ckpt-2 0.28 1.00 0.19 0.19 0.18 ckpt-2 0.04 1.00 0.15 0.33 0.18 |
| 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 |
| ckpt-3 0.22 0.37 1.00 0.43 0.35 ckpt-3 0.06 0.12 1.00 0.10 0.08 ckpt-3 0.20 0.19 1.00 0.35 0.28 ckpt-3 0.05 0.15 1.00 0.19 0.32 |
| 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 |
| ckpt-4 0.30 0.33 0.43 1.00 0.47 ckpt-4 0.06 0.10 0.10 1.00 0.08 ckpt-4 0.30 0.19 0.35 1.00 0.39 ckpt-4 0.03 0.33 0.19 1.00 0.23 |
| 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 |
| ckpt-5 0.25 0.32 0.35 0.47 1.00 ckpt-5 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.00 ckpt-5 0.23 0.18 0.28 0.39 1.00 ckpt-5 0.05 0.18 0.32 0.23 1.00 |
| 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 |
| Figure2: Featureoverlapheatmapsacrosstrainingcheckpointsunderdifferenttrainingparadigms. |
| 104 |
| 103 |
| 102 |
| 101 |
| 100 |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
| Model Attribution Score |
| tnuoC |
| Qwen3-4B-Base |
| 104 |
| 103 |
| 102 |
| 101 |
| 100 |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
| Model Attribution Score |
| tnuoC |
| Qwen3-4B-SFT |
| 104 |
| 103 |
| 102 |
| 101 |
| 100 |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
| Model Attribution Score |
| tnuoC |
| Qwen3-4B-RL |
| Figure3: DistributionofModelAttributionScoresacrossdifferenttrainingmethodsonQwen3-4B-Base. |
| SFTQuicklyEstablishesaRelativelyFixedSet servethatSFTrapidlyformsacomparativelysta- |
| of Internal Features, While RL Promotes a blehierarchyofmodel-specificfeatures,withlater |
| Slower and More Incremental Process of Fea- trainingprimarilyrefiningtheirrelativeimportance. |
| tureFormation. Foreachcheckpoint,weranked In contrast, RL induces features more gradually, |
| featuresbydescendingNRNandretainthetop50 withtrainingpersistentlyreshapingwhichinternal |
| as the most distinctive (i.e., model-specific) fea- featuresaremostsalientforgeneratingcorrectout- |
| tures at that stage. We then computed the over- comes. Visualizationresultsanddetailedanalyses |
| lap of these top-ranked features across different areprovidedinAppendixB.1. |
| checkpoints. AsshowninFigure2,theSFT-tuned Toassesswhetherourfindingsgeneralizeacross |
| model exhibits a high degree of feature overlap model families, we further conduct controlled |
| across checkpoints. A substantial portion of the post-training and feature-level analysis on a dif- |
| top-rankedSFT-specificfeaturesidentifiedatearly ferentarchitecture,namelyLlama3.1-8B-Instruct |
| checkpointspersiststhroughoutlaterstagesoftrain- (Grattafiori et al., 2024). The corresponding re- |
| ing. Thisindicatesthatmanyofthefeaturesintro- sultsarepresentedinAppendixB.2. Weobserve |
| ducedbySFTemergeearlyandremainconsistently consistentpatternswiththosefoundintheQwen |
| dominantduringsubsequentoptimization. family,indicatingthattherepresentationaldistinc- |
| In contrast, the RL-tuned model displays neg- tionsbetweenSFTandRLarenotmodel-specific |
| ligible overlap between the top-ranked feature butbroadlyapplicableacrossarchitectures. |
| sets of adjacent checkpoints. Features that are |
| Inconclusion,thecontrastbetweenSFTandRL |
| highlyrankedatanearliercheckpointrarelyremain |
| featuresrevealstwofundamentallydifferentmodes |
| among the top features at the subsequent check- |
| ofrepresentationchange: |
| point. Only toward the end of training does the |
| overlapincrease,suggestingthatRLdelaysfeature |
| • SFT rapidly introduces a large number of |
| consolidationandinsteadexploresabroadersetof |
| model-specificfeaturesthatcloselyreplicate |
| candidatefeaturesbeforegraduallystabilizingits |
| the teacher’s reasoning traces, while simul- |
| featurecomposition. |
| taneously discarding many pre-existing fea- |
| SFT Primarily Refines Feature Strengths Af- tures. Aftertheformation,theoverallfeature |
| ter Early Formation, While RL Continuously composition remains largely stable. Subse- |
| ReordersFeatureImportance Beyondfeature quent optimization primarily adjusts the rel- |
| persistence,wefurtherexaminedhowtherelative ativestrengthsofthesefeatures. Thisyields |
| importanceoffeaturesevolvesbyanalyzingrank a rigid and specialized feature space tightly |
| shifts between consecutive checkpoints. We ob- alignedwiththetrainingdistribution. |
| |
| 1.0 1.0 |
| Com |
| O |
| m |
| p |
| o |
| e |
| n |
| n |
| s |
| B |
| e |
| o |
| n |
| o |
| se |
| kQ |
| Q |
| A |
| A 1 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 0 |
| 6 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9 |
| 7 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 8 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 8 Com |
| O |
| m |
| p |
| o |
| e |
| n |
| n |
| s |
| B |
| e |
| o |
| n |
| o |
| se |
| kQ |
| Q |
| A |
| A 1 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| . |
| . |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 7 |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 8 |
| 9 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| . |
| . |
| 6 |
| 8 |
| SciQ 0.50 0.54 1.00 0.51 0.57 SciQ 0.46 0.53 1.00 0.57 0.56 |
| 0.4 0.4 |
| HeadQA 0.49 0.57 0.51 1.00 0.62 |
| 0.2 |
| HeadQA 0.62 0.74 0.57 1.00 0.74 |
| 0.2 |
| ARC |
| C |
| -C om |
| ha |
| m |
| lle |
| o |
| n |
| n |
| g |
| se |
| e |
| nse O Q |
| 0 |
| p A |
| . |
| e |
| 6 |
| nB |
| 8 |
| ookQ |
| 0 |
| A |
| .74 Sc |
| 0 |
| iQ |
| .5 H |
| 7 |
| ea A d R Q |
| 0 |
| C A - |
| . |
| C |
| 6 |
| h |
| 2 |
| alleng |
| 1 |
| e |
| .00 0.0 ARC |
| C |
| -C om |
| ha |
| m |
| lle |
| o |
| n |
| n |
| g |
| se |
| e |
| nse O Q |
| 0 |
| p A |
| . |
| e |
| 6 |
| nB |
| 9 |
| ookQ |
| 0 |
| A |
| .82 Sc |
| 0 |
| iQ |
| .5 H |
| 6 |
| ea A d R Q |
| 0 |
| C A - |
| . |
| C |
| 7 |
| h |
| 4 |
| alleng |
| 1 |
| e |
| .00 0.0 |
| Figure4: Overlapofidentifiedgeneralization-controllingfeaturesacrosstasks. Left: Qwen3-4B-RLvs.Qwen3-4B- |
| Base. Right: Qwen2.5-7B-RLvs.Qwen2.5-7B. |
| • RLintroducesfeaturedeviationsinagradual theinternalfeaturelandscapeinfundamentallydif- |
| andrestrainedmanner,yieldingrelativelyfew ferent ways. SFT introduces a large number of |
| andlessexclusivefeatures. Ratherthansub- strongly model-specific features, while RL pre- |
| stantiallyreplacingthebasemodel’sinternal dominantlypreservesandreweightssharedfeatures |
| representationalstructure,RLinduceslimited within the existing representational space. More |
| featureinnovationwhileexhibitingsustained importantly, it enables downstream mechanistic |
| featureturnoverthroughouttraining. analysis: itservesasthefoundationforidentifying |
| featuresassociatedwithcross-taskgeneralization |
| These findings indicate that SFT and RL dif- inthenextsection. |
| fernotonlyinthefinalfeaturestheyproduce,but |
| alsointhetemporaldynamicsoffeatureformation. 7 MechanisticExplanationforthe |
| Importantly,theprolongedfeaturereconfiguration GeneralizationAbilityofRL |
| observedinRLsuggestsatrainingprocessthatre- |
| RL-tuned models are optimized solely on math- |
| mainssensitivetoperformancefeedbackthrough- |
| ematical reasoning tasks, yet they achieve sub- |
| out optimization, a property that may be closely |
| stantialgainsnotonlyonin-domainmathematics |
| relatedtothestrongercross-taskgeneralizationbe- |
| benchmarks but also on disparate tasks such as |
| havioranalyzedinthenextsection. |
| commonsense and scientific knowledge question |
| 6 Experiments: JointComparisonwith answering. Thiscross-taskgeneralizationcannot |
| Three-ModelSparseCrosscoders beexplainedbydataoverlaportasksimilarity,and |
| thereforecallsforamechanisticexplanation. |
| Usingthetrainedthree-modelSparseCrosscoder, |
| Ourprioranalysesprovideaninitialexplanation: |
| wecomputedtheMASsforeachfeature,measur- |
| RLinducesrestrained,incrementalfeaturechanges, |
| inghowstronglythefeatureisattributedtothebase, |
| whereasSFTintroducesaggressivefeaturerecon- |
| SFT-tuned,orRL-tunedmodelwithinasharedfea- |
| figuration that may lead to over-specialization. |
| ture space. Figure 3 illustrates the MAS distri- |
| However, this explanation remains indirect. To |
| butions for Qwen3-4B-Base across the different |
| establishamoreconcretemechanisticaccount,we |
| training conditions. The MAS distributions for |
| seek direct evidence linking specific internal fea- |
| theSFT-tunedmodelsexhibitapronouncedright |
| turestotheobservedgeneralizationbehavior. |
| tail. A substantial number of features attain high |
| attributionscores. ThispatternsuggeststhatSFT Experimental Setup. We performed feature |
| introduces a large set of strongly model-specific identification using the method proposed in Sec- |
| features. ComparedtoSFT,RLproducesfarfewer tion 3.2 on all five evaluation tasks introduced in |
| features that are strongly attributed to itself. The Section4. Foreachtask,wesetthethresholdtas |
| sameobservationscanbefoundonQwen2.5-7B, 20%ofthemaximumscoreobservedforthattask. |
| asshowninFigure5inAppendixB.3. Whenexaminingthegeneralizationfeaturesiden- |
| Thethree-modelSparseCrosscoderprovidesdi- tified for each task, we observe a striking degree |
| rectempiricalevidencethatSFTandRLreshape of consistency across tasks. To further substan- |
| |
| | | Model | | | OpenBookQA | | CommonsenseQA | | HeadQA | | SciQ | ARC-Challenge | | | |
| | --- | ------------- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | ------------- | --- | ------ | --- | ----- | ------------- | ----- | --- | |
| | | Qwen3-4B-RL | | | -46.2 | | -43.9 | | -21.2 | | -14.0 | | -33.3 | | |
| | | Qwen2.5-7B-RL | | | -21.9 | | -24.4 | | -23.8 | | -44.4 | | -20.0 | | |
| Table2: Performancedegradationinducedbytheremovalofgeneralization-relatedfeaturesinRL–tunedmodels. |
| | | Model | | | OpenBookQA | | CommonsenseQA | | HeadQA | | SciQ | ARC-Challenge | | | |
| | --- | ------------- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | ------------- | --- | ------ | --- | ----- | ------------- | ----- | --- | |
| | | Qwen3-4B-Base | | | +36.3 | | +36.0 | | +21.2 | | +38.0 | | +33.3 | | |
| | | Qwen2.5-7B | | | +12.5 | | +24.4 | | +14.3 | | +55.6 | | +40.0 | | |
| Table3: Performanceimprovementachievedbyamplifyinggeneralization-relatedfeaturesinthebasemodel. |
| tiate this observation, we quantified the overlap Qwen2.5-7Btocorrectlyanswer56%ofsamples |
| amongtheidentifiedfeaturesacrossdifferenttasks, thatitpreviouslyansweredincorrectly. |
| asillustratedinFigure4. Theresultsrevealasub- Thisfindingsuggeststhatthebasemodeldoes |
| | stantial | level | of feature | | overlap, | even over | 80%. | | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | ----- | ---------- | --- | -------- | --------- | ---- | ----------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | notlackthenecessaryknowledge. | | | | | Instead,therele- | | |
| Despite the diversity of these benchmarks, many vantupstreamcircuitryispresentbutnotnaturally |
| featuresconsistentlyappearacrosstasks,strongly activated. Onceacontrolsignalisforciblyinjected, |
| suggestingtheexistenceoftask-agnosticfeatures generalizedbehaviorsemergeprominently. |
| thatsupportgeneralization. |
| | | | | | | | | Generalization | | to | Unseen | Tasks. | | We further | |
| | --- | -------- | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | -------------- | -------- | -------------- | --- | ------- | -------------- | ------ | -------------- | ---------- | |
| | The | final | intersection | | across all | tasks contains | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | evaluated | | whether | the identified | | generalization | | |
| | 50 | features | for Qwen3-4B-Base | | | and 16 | features | | | | | | | | |
| for Qwen2.5-7B, which we refer to as the final features transfer beyond the tasks used for fea- |
| | | | | | | | | ture | identification. | | Specifically, | | we tested | them | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --------------- | --- | ------------- | --- | --------- | ---- | |
| generalization-controllingfeatures. |
| | | | | | | | | on two | unseen | benchmarks, | | LogiQA | | (Liu et al., | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | ------ | ----------- | --- | ------ | --- | ------------ | |
| 7.1 CausalValidationviaFeature 2021) and PIQA (Bisk et al., 2020). We observe |
| | | Interventions | | | | | | consistentperformancedegradationwhenzeroing | | | | | | | |
| | --- | ------------- | -------------- | --- | ---------- | -------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------- | -------- | ------------- | --- | ------- | --- | ---------- | |
| | | | | | | | | these | features | in RL-trained | | models, | | and corre- | |
| | To | verify | the functional | | importance | of these | fea- | | | | | | | | |
| spondingperformanceimprovementswhenampli- |
| tures,weconductedtwocomplementaryinterven- |
| | | | | | | | | fying | them | in base | models. | This | provides | addi- | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---- | ------- | ------- | ---- | -------- | ----- | |
| tionexperiments. |
| tionalevidencethattheidentifiedfeaturescapturea |
| ZeroingGeneralizationFeaturesintheRLMod- general-purposegeneralizationmechanism,rather |
| els. Wefirstconductedablationexperimentsby thantask-specificheuristics. Detailedexperimental |
| zeroingouttheidentifiedfeaturesintheRLmodel |
| setupandresultsareprovidedinAppendixB.4. |
| andevaluatingperformanceonthecorresponding |
| | generalization-critical | | | samples. | | As shown | in Ta- | 8 | Conclusion | | | | | | |
| | ----------------------- | ------- | ------------ | -------- | -------------- | ----------- | ------ | ---- | ---------- | ---------------- | --- | --- | -------- | ---- | |
| | ble | 2, this | intervention | | leads to | substantial | per- | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | This | work | has investigated | | why | RL-tuned | LLMs | |
| | formance | | degradation. | | In particular, | for | Open- | | | | | | | | |
| generalizebeyondtheirtrainingdistribution,while |
| BookQAandCommonsenseQA,zeroingthesefea- |
| SFToftenleadstothelossofgeneralcapabilities. |
| | tures | causes | the Qwen3-4B-RL | | | model to | answer | | | | | | | | |
| | ----- | ------ | --------------- | --- | --- | -------- | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Usingacontrolledexperimentalsetupandafeature- |
| over40%ofpreviouslycorrectsamplesincorrectly. |
| levelinterpretabilityframework,wehavecompared |
| | These | results | indicate | that | the identified | | features | | | | | | | | |
| | ----- | ------- | -------- | ---- | -------------- | --- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| howRLandSFTreshapeinternalrepresentations |
| arenecessaryforsuccessfulgeneralization. |
| | | | | | | | | during | post-training. | | We | have | shown | that SFT | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | -------------- | --- | --- | ---- | ----- | -------- | |
| AmplifyingGeneralizationFeaturesintheBase rapidlyintroduceshighlyspecializedfeaturesthat |
| Models. Conversely,weamplifiedthesameset stabilize early in training, whereas RL induces |
| offeaturesinthebasemodelbysettingtheiracti- more restrained and continually evolving feature |
| vations to a fixed large value (we set to 3.0), fol- changesthatlargelypreservethebasemodel’srep- |
| lowing standard feature intervention practices in resentations. Buildingonthisdistinction,wehave |
| SAE-basedanalyses(Zhangetal.,2025;Hanetal., identified a compact set of internal features that |
| 2025). TheresultsareshowninTable3. Acrossall causallycontrolcross-taskgeneralization. Feature- |
| tasks,performanceimprovessubstantially. Inpar- levelinterventionshaveconfirmedtheirrole: dis- |
| ticular,forSciQ,amplifyingthesefeaturesenables abling these features degrades RL performance, |
| |
| whileamplifyingthemtransfersgeneralizationbe- |
| haviortobasemodels,includingonunseentasks. |
| | Overall, | our results have | provided | a mechanistic | |
| | ----------- | ---------------- | -------------- | ------------- | |
| | explanation | for why | RL generalizes | while SFT | |
| | memorizes, | and have | demonstrated | the value of | |
| feature-levelinterpretabilityforunderstandingpost- |
| trainingdynamicsinLLMs. |
| |
| Limitations |
| | | | | | | | Sergey | Levine, | and | Yi Ma. | 2025. | SFT | mem- | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------- | --------------- | --- | ------ | ----------- | --- | -------- | |
| | | | | | | | orizes, | RL generalizes: | | A | comparative | | study of | |
| First, our feature-level analysis relies on Sparse foundation model post-training. arXiv preprint |
| arXiv:2501.17161. |
| | Crosscoders | as the | underlying | alignment | | mecha- | | | | | | | | |
| | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | --------- | --- | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| nism. Althoughthisapproachenablesinterpretable |
| PeterClark,IsaacCowhey,OrenEtzioni,TusharKhot, |
| andcomparablefeaturerepresentations,thelearned |
| AshishSabharwal,CarissaSchoenick,andOyvind |
| featurespaceisnotguaranteedtocaptureallfunc- Tafjord.2018. Thinkyouhavesolvedquestionan- |
| | | | | | | | swering? | try | ARC, | the AI2 | reasoning | | challenge. | |
| | ----------------- | -------- | ----------- | --- | ----- | ------ | -------- | --- | ---- | ------- | --------- | --- | ---------- | |
| | tionally relevant | internal | structures. | | Other | inter- | | | | | | | | |
| CoRR,abs/1803.05457. |
| pretabilitymethodsoralignmentschemesmayre- |
| vealcomplementarymechanismsthatarenotcap- HoagyCunningham,AidanEwart,LoganRiggs,Robert |
| tured by sparse feature decomposition. Second, Huben,andLeeSharkey.2023. Sparseautoencoders |
| whileourinference-timefeatureinterventionses- findhighlyinterpretablefeaturesinlanguagemodels. |
| arXivpreprintarXiv:2309.08600. |
| tablishcausallinkstomodelbehavior,theydonot |
| directly inform how to design training objectives DamaiDai,LiDong,YaruHao,ZhifangSui,Baobao |
| | | | | | | | Chang, | and Furu | Wei. | 2022. | Knowledge | | neurons | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | -------- | ---- | ----- | --------- | --- | ------- | |
| thatexplicitlyencouragegeneralization-controlling |
| features. Weleavethedevelopmentofsuchtraining in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the |
| 60thAnnualMeetingoftheAssociationforCompu- |
| strategiestofuturework. |
| | | | | | | | tationalLinguistics(Volume1: | | | | LongPapers),ACL | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --------------- | --- | --- | |
| 2022,Dublin,Ireland,May22-27,2022,pages8493– |
| Acknowledgements 8502.AssociationforComputationalLinguistics. |
| The present research was supported by the Na- BoyiDeng,YuWan,BaosongYang,YidanZhang,and |
| tional Key Research and Development Program Fuli Feng. 2025. Unveiling language-specific fea- |
| | | | | | | | tures in | large | language | models | via | sparse | autoen- | |
| | -------- | ---------- | --------------- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | ----- | -------- | ------ | --- | ------ | ------- | |
| | of China | (Grant No. | 2024YFE0203000) | | | and | | | | | | | | |
| coders. InProceedingsofthe63rdAnnualMeeting |
| | the International | Cooperation | | Program | | for Inno- | | | | | | | | |
| | ----------------- | ----------- | --- | ------- | --- | --------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| oftheAssociationforComputationalLinguistics(Vol- |
| vative Talents Development of CSC (Grant No. ume1: LongPapers),pages4563–4608. |
| | CXXM2310203712). | | We | would | like | to thank | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------- | --- | --- | ----- | ---- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| AndreyGalichin,AlexeyDontsov,PolinaDruzhinina, |
| theanonymousreviewersfortheirinsightfulcom- |
| AntonRazzhigaev,OlegYRogov,ElenaTutubalina, |
| ments. |
| | | | | | | | and Ivan | Oseledets. | 2025. | | I have | covered | all the | |
| | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | ----- | ------ | ------------- | ------- | ------- | |
| | | | | | | | baseshere: | Interpretingreasoningfeaturesinlarge | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | language | models | via | sparse | autoencoders. | | arXiv | |
| | References | | | | | | preprintarXiv:2503.18878. | | | | | | | |
| DavidDBaekandMaxTegmark.2025. Towardsun- LeoGao, TomDuprélaTour, HenkTillman, Gabriel |
| derstandingdistilledreasoningmodels: Arepresenta- Goh, Rajan Troll, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, |
| tionalapproach. arXivpreprintarXiv:2503.03730. Jan Leike, and Jeffrey Wu. 2024a. Scaling and |
| | | | | | | | evaluating | sparse | autoencoders. | | | arXiv | preprint | |
| | ----------------------------------------------- | --- | --------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ----------------- | ------ | ------------- | --- | --- | ----- | -------- | |
| | YonatanBisk,RowanZellers,JianfengGao,YejinChoi, | | | | | | arXiv:2406.04093. | | | | | | | |
| | and1others.2020. | | PIQA:Reasoningaboutphysical | | | | | | | | | | | |
| commonsenseinnaturallanguage. InProceedings Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Stella Bider- |
| oftheAAAIconferenceonartificialintelligence,vol- man, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, |
| ume34,pages7432–7439. Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Alain Le Noac’h, |
| | | | | | | | Haonan | Li, Kyle | McDonell, | | Niklas | Muennighoff, | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | -------- | --------- | --- | ------ | ------------ | --- | |
| Yupeng Chang, Xu Wang, Jindong Wang, Yuan Wu, ChrisOciepa,JasonPhang,LariaReynolds,Hailey |
| | Linyi Yang, | Kaijie | Zhu, Hao | Chen, | Xiaoyuan | Yi, | | | | | | | | |
| | ----------- | ------ | -------- | ----- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Schoelkopf,AviyaSkowron,LintangSutawika,and |
| CunxiangWang,YidongWang,and1others.2024. 5 others. 2024b. The language model evaluation |
| | A survey | on evaluation | of | large | language | models. | harness. | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | ------------- | --- | ----- | -------- | ------- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| ACMtransactionsonintelligentsystemsandtechnol- |
| ogy,15(3):1–45. AaronGrattafiori,AbhimanyuDubey,AbhinavJauhri, |
| | | | | | | | Abhinav | Pandey, | Abhishek | | Kadian, | Ahmad | Al- | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------- | ------- | -------- | --- | ------- | ----- | --- | |
| RuizheChen,TianxiangHu,YangFeng,andZuozhu |
| Dahle,AieshaLetman,AkhilMathur,AlanSchelten, |
| Liu. 2024. Learnable privacy neurons localization AlexVaughan,and1others.2024. Thellama3herd |
| inlanguagemodels. InProceedingsofthe62ndAn- ofmodels. arXivpreprintarXiv:2407.21783. |
| nualMeetingoftheAssociationforComputational |
| Linguistics,ACL2024-ShortPapers,Bangkok,Thai- Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao |
| land,August11-16,2024,pages256–264.Associa- Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shi- |
| rongMa,PeiyiWang,XiaoBi,and1others.2025. |
| tionforComputationalLinguistics. |
| | | | | | | | Deepseek-r1: | | Incentivizingreasoningcapabilityin | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------ | --- | ---------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| TianzheChu,YuexiangZhai,JihanYang,Shengbang LLMs via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint |
| | Tong, Saining | Xie, | Dale Schuurmans, | | Quoc | V Le, | arXiv:2501.12948. | | | | | | | |
| | ------------- | ---- | ---------------- | --- | ---- | ----- | ----------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| |
| ZishanGuo,RenrenJin,ChuangLiu,YufeiHuang,Dan NeginRaoof,EtashKumarGuha,RyanMarten,Jean |
| Shi,LinhaoYu,YanLiu,JiaxuanLi,BojianXiong, Mercat, Eric Frankel, Sedrick Keh, Hritik Bansal, |
| and Deyi Xiong. 2023. Evaluating large language GeorgiosSmyrnis,MariannaNezhurina,TrungVu, |
| models: A comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint ZayneReaSprague,MikeAMerrill,LiangyuChen, |
| arXiv:2310.19736. CarolineChoi,ZaidKhan,SachinGrover,Benjamin |
| | | | | | | | | Feuer, | Ashima | Suvarna, | Shiye | Su, and | 27 others. | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | ------ | -------- | ----- | ------- | ---------- | |
| ZhuowenHan,XinweiWu,DanShi,RenrenJin,and 2025. AutomaticevalsforLLMs. |
| | DeyiXiong.2025. | | Towardsaunifiedparadigmof | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | --------------- | --- | ------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| concepteditinginlargelanguagemodels. InProceed- Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, |
| ingsofthe2025ConferenceonEmpiricalMethodsin |
| JunxiaoSong,XiaoBi,HaoweiZhang,Mingchuan |
| NaturalLanguageProcessing,pages18445–18461. |
| | | | | | | | | Zhang, | YK | Li, Yang | Wu, and | 1 others. | 2024. | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | --- | -------- | ------- | --------- | ----- | |
| AssociationforComputationalLinguistics. DeepSeekMath: Pushingthelimitsofmathematical |
| | | | | | | | | reasoninginopenlanguagemodels. | | | | arXivpreprint | | |
| | ---------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | ------------- | --- | |
| | DanHendrycks,CollinBurns,StevenBasart,AndyZou, | | | | | | | arXiv:2402.03300. | | | | | | |
| MantasMazeika,DawnSong,andJacobSteinhardt. |
| 2021. Measuringmassivemultitasklanguageunder- |
| | | | | | | | | Guangming | Sheng, | Chi Zhang, | Zilingfeng | | Ye, Xibin | |
| | --------- | ----------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | --- | --------- | |
| | standing. | InInternationalConferenceonLearning | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Wu,WangZhang,RuZhang,YanghuaPeng,Haibin |
| | Representations. | | | | | | | Lin,andChuanWu.2025. | | | HybridFlow: | | Aflexible | |
| | ---------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------------------- | --- | --- | ----------- | --------------- | --------- | |
| | | | | | | | | andefficientRLHFframework. | | | | InProceedingsof | | |
| Maggie Huan, Yuetai Li, Tuney Zheng, Xiaoyu Xu, the Twentieth European Conference on Computer |
| SeungoneKim,MinxinDu,RadhaPoovendran,Gra- |
| Systems,pages1279–1297. |
| | hamNeubig,andXiangYue.2025. | | | | Doesmathrea- | | | | | | | | | |
| | --------------------------- | --- | ------- | ----------------- | ------------ | ------ | --- | -------- | ------ | ------------ | ----- | ------- | ----- | |
| | soning improve | | general | LLM capabilities? | | under- | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Dan Shi, | Renren | Jin, Tianhao | Shen, | Weilong | Dong, | |
| arXiv |
| standing transferability of LLM reasoning. XinweiWu,andDeyiXiong.2024a. IRCAN:Mit- |
| preprintarXiv:2507.00432. igatingknowledgeconflictsinLLMgenerationvia |
| identifyingandreweightingcontext-awareneurons. |
| AaronJaech,AdamKalai,AdamLerer,AdamRichard- |
| AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems, |
| | son, Ahmed | El-Kishky, | | Aiden | Low, | Alec Helyar, | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------- | ---------- | --- | ----- | ---- | ------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| 37:4997–5024. |
| AleksanderMadry,AlexBeutel,AlexCarney,and1 |
| | others.2024. | Openaio1systemcard. | | | arXivpreprint | | | | | | | | | |
| | ------------ | ------------------- | --- | --- | ------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| DanShi,TianhaoShen,YufeiHuang,ZhigenLi,Yongqi |
| arXiv:2412.16720. |
| Leng,RenrenJin,ChuangLiu,XinweiWu,Zishan |
| | | | | | | | | Guo, | Linhao | Yu, and | 1 others. | 2024b. | Large lan- | |
| | ------------- | -------- | ---------- | ------- | -------- | ----------- | --- | --------------------------------- | ------ | ------- | --------- | ------------- | ---------- | |
| | Jack Lindsey, | Adly | Templeton, | | Jonathan | Marcus, | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | guagemodelsafety:Aholisticsurvey. | | | | arXivpreprint | | |
| | Thomas | Conerly, | Joshua | Batson, | and | Christopher | | | | | | | | |
| arXiv:2412.17686. |
| | Olah. 2024. | Sparse | crosscoders | | for | cross-layer | | | | | | | | |
| | ----------- | --------- | ----------- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | features | and model | diffing. | Transformer | | Circuits | | | | | | | | |
| DanShi,ChaobinYou,JiantaoHuang,TaihaoLi,and |
| Thread. |
| | | | | | | | | DeyiXiong.2024c. | | CORECODE:Acommonsense | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------- | --- | --------------------- | --- | --- | --- | |
| annotateddialoguedatasetwithbenchmarktasksfor |
| | Jian Liu, Leyang | Cui, | Hanmeng | Liu, | Dandan | Huang, | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------- | ---- | ---------- | ---- | ------ | ------- | --- | ------- | ----- | -------- | ------- | -------------- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | chinese | large | language | models. | In Proceedings | of | |
| | Yile Wang, | and | Yue Zhang. | | 2021. | LogiQA: | a | | | | | | | |
| theAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligence,vol- |
| | challenge | dataset | for machine | | reading | comprehen- | | | | | | | | |
| | --------- | ------- | ----------- | --- | ------- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| sion with logical reasoning. In Proceedings of the ume38,pages18952–18960. |
| Twenty-NinthInternationalConferenceonInterna- |
| | | | | | | | | Alon Talmor, | | Jonathan Herzig, | Nicholas | Lourie, | and | |
| | ------------ | ----------- | --- | ------------- | --- | ------------- | --- | -------------------- | --- | ---------------- | -------------------- | ------- | --- | |
| | tional Joint | Conferences | | on Artificial | | Intelligence, | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | JonathanBerant.2019. | | | CommonsenseQA:Aques- | | | |
| pages3622–3628. |
| | | | | | | | | tion answering | | challenge | targeting | commonsense | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------- | --- | --------- | --------- | ----------- | --- | |
| InProceedingsofthe2019Conference |
| | MichaelLuo,SijunTan,JustinWong,XiaoxiangShi, | | | | | | | knowledge. | | | | | | |
| | -------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| WilliamY.Tang,MananRoongta,ColinCai,Jeffrey oftheNorthAmericanChapteroftheAssociationfor |
| Luo,LiErranLi,RalucaAdaPopa,andIonStoica. ComputationalLinguistics: HumanLanguageTech- |
| nologies,Volume1(LongandShortPapers),pages |
| | 2025. DeepScaleR: | | Surpassing | | o1-preview | with | a | | | | | | | |
| | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | --- | ---------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| 4149–4158,Minneapolis,Minnesota.Associationfor |
| | 1.5bmodelbyscalingRL. | | | NotionBlog. | | | | | | | | | | |
| | --------------------- | --- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| ComputationalLinguistics. |
| SamuelMarks,CanRager,EricJMichaud,YonatanBe- |
| linkov,DavidBau,andAaronMueller.2025. Sparse Kimi Team, Angang Du, Bofei Gao, Bowei Xing, |
| featurecircuits:Discoveringandeditinginterpretable Changjiu Jiang, Cheng Chen, Cheng Li, Chenjun |
| | | | | | InTheThirteenth | | | Xiao,ChenzhuangDu,ChonghuaLiao,and1others. | | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------------- | --- | --- | ------------------------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| causalgraphsinlanguagemodels. |
| | | | | | | | | 2025. | Kimi | k1. 5: Scaling | reinforcement | | learning | |
| | ------------- | ---------- | --- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | --- | --------- | ---- | ------------------------------ | ------------- | --- | -------- | |
| | International | Conference | | on Learning | | Representa- | | | | | | | | |
| | tions. | | | | | | | withLLMs. | | arXivpreprintarXiv:2501.12599. | | | | |
| TodorMihaylov,PeterClark,TusharKhot,andAshish David Vilares and Carlos Gómez-Rodríguez. 2019. |
| Sabharwal.2018. Canasuitofarmorconductelec- HEAD-QA:Ahealthcaredatasetforcomplexreason- |
| tricity? a new dataset for open book question an- ing. InProceedingsofthe57thAnnualMeetingof |
| swering. InProceedingsofthe2018Conferenceon theAssociationforComputationalLinguistics,pages |
| EmpiricalMethodsinNaturalLanguageProcessing, 960–966,Florence,Italy.AssociationforComputa- |
| | pages2381–2391. | | | | | | | tionalLinguistics. | | | | | | |
| | --------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| |
| JohannesWelbl,NelsonFLiu,andMattGardner.2017. |
| | Crowdsourcing | | multiple | choice | science | questions. | |
| | ------------- | --- | -------- | ------ | ------- | ---------- | |
| InProceedingsofthe3rdWorkshoponNoisyUser- |
| generatedText,pages94–106. |
| JiaqiWeng,HanZheng,HanyuZhang,QinqinHe,Jial- |
| | ingTao, | HuiXue, | ZhixuanChu, | | andXitingWang. | | |
| | --------------------------------- | -------- | ----------- | ------ | -------------- | ---------- | |
| | 2025. Safe-SAIL: | | Towards | a | fine-grained | safety | |
| | landscape | of large | language | models | via | sparse au- | |
| | toencoderinterpretationframework. | | | | arXivpreprint | | |
| arXiv:2509.18127. |
| XinweiWu,JunzhuoLi,MinghuiXu,WeilongDong, |
| | ShuangzhiWu, | | ChaoBian, | andDeyiXiong.2023. | | | |
| | ------------ | --- | --------- | ------------------ | --- | --- | |
| DEPN:Detectingandeditingprivacyneuronsinpre- |
| | trainedlanguagemodels. | | | InProceedingsofthe2023 | | | |
| | ---------------------- | ------------ | --- | ---------------------- | ---------- | ---- | |
| | Conference | on Empirical | | Methods | in Natural | Lan- | |
| guageProcessing,EMNLP2023,Singapore,Decem- |
| | ber 6-10, | 2023, | pages 2875–2886. | | Association | for | |
| | --------- | ----- | ---------------- | --- | ----------- | --- | |
| ComputationalLinguistics. |
| AnYang,AnfengLi,BaosongYang,BeichenZhang, |
| | Binyuan | Hui, | Bo Zheng, | Bowen | Yu, | Chang | |
| | ------------ | ----- | --------- | ------- | ------- | --------- | |
| | Gao, Chengen | | Huang, | Chenxu | Lv, and | 1 others. | |
| | 2025. | Qwen3 | technical | report. | arXiv | preprint | |
| arXiv:2505.09388. |
| AnYang,BaosongYang,BeichenZhang,BinyuanHui, |
| BoZheng,BowenYu,ChengyuanLi,DayihengLiu, |
| FeiHuang,GuantingDong,HaoranWei,HuanLin, |
| JianYang,JianhongTu,JianweiZhang,JianxinYang, |
| JiaxinYang,JingrenZhou,JunyangLin,and25oth- |
| | ers.2024. | Qwen2.5technicalreport. | | | arXivpreprint | | |
| | --------- | ----------------------- | --- | --- | ------------- | --- | |
| arXiv:2412.15115. |
| | Jehyeok Yeon, | Federico | Cinus, | Yifan | Wu, | and Luca | |
| | ------------- | ------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | --------- | -------- | |
| | Luceri.2025. | GSAE:Graph-regularizedsparseau- | | | | | |
| | toencoders | for robust | LLM | safety | steering. | arXiv | |
| preprintarXiv:2512.06655. |
| KaichenZhang,YifeiShen,BoLi,andZiweiLiu.2025. |
| Largemulti-modalmodelscaninterpretfeaturesin |
| | large multi-modal | | models. | In | Proceedings | of the | |
| | ----------------- | ------------- | ------- | ---------- | ----------- | -------- | |
| | IEEE/CVF | International | | Conference | on | Computer | |
| Vision,pages3650–3661. |
| | Yaowei Zheng, | Richong | Zhang, | | Junhao Zhang, | Yan- | |
| | ------------- | ------- | ------ | --- | ------------- | ---- | |
| hanYe,ZheyanLuo,ZhangchiFeng,andYongqiang |
| | Ma. 2024. | Llamafactory: | | Unified | efficient | fine- | |
| | --------- | ------------- | -------- | ------- | --------- | -------- | |
| | tuning of | 100+ | language | models. | arXiv | preprint | |
| arXiv:2403.13372. |
| |
| A ExperimentalSettings |
| | | | | | | | | et al., 2025), | | and we | retain | only | those responses | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------- | --- | ------ | ------ | ---- | --------------- | --- | |
| thatleadtocorrectfinalanswers. |
| Inthissection,weprovidemoredetailsaboutthe |
| | experimentalsettings. | | | | | | | A.3 TrainingDetails | | | | | | | |
| | --------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------- | --- | -------- | --- | ---- | --- | -------- | |
| | | | | | | | | Reinforcement | | Learning | | (RL) | has | recently | |
| A.1 TrainingDetailsofCrosscoders |
| | | | | | | | | demonstrated | | notable | success | in | enhancing | the | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------ | --- | ------- | ------- | --- | --------- | --- | |
| Following Baek and Tegmark (2025), we train complex, multi-step reasoning capabilities of |
| each crosscoder with d sparse = 32,768 LLMs by optimizing policies with scalar reward |
| | features | on | 200 | million | tokens | from | open- | | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | --- | --- | ------- | ------ | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| signals. Inourstudy,weadopttheverlframework |
| thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k1 and another 200 (Shengetal.,2025)andimplementGRPO(Shao |
| milliontokensfromtogethercomputer/RedPajama- etal.,2024)ontheQwen-3-4B-BaseandQwen2.5- |
| | Data-1T-Sample2 | | dataset. | | The | former | includes | | | | | | | | |
| | --------------- | --- | -------- | --- | --- | ------ | -------- | --------- | -------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | 7Bmodels. | Trainingisperformedwithanoverall | | | | | | |
| math, science, and code reasoning traces gener- batchsizeof128andalearningrateof1×10−6. |
| atedbyDeepSeek-R1,whereasthelattercontains Wesetthegenerationsequencelengthupto16kto- |
| general-domaintexts. Toavoiddistributionalbias, kens,andperform8rolloutsperprompt,updating |
| thetwodatasetsaremergedandjointlyshuffledbe- |
| | | | | | | | | themodelinmini-batchesof64samples. | | | | | Clipping | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | --- | |
| foretraining,ratherthanbeingtrainedsequentially. thresholdsaresetbetween0.22and0.28toensure |
| Thismixedcorpusallowsthecrosscodertocapture stable policy updates, while both KL-divergence |
| | both reasoning-related | | | and | general | linguistic | fea- | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ------- | ---------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| andentropypenaltiesareturnedoff(coefficientsset |
| tures. Allcrosscodersaretrainedtoreconstructthe |
| | | | | | | | | tozero). | Themodelistrainedforoneepoch,and | | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | -------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| residualstreamofthemiddlelayerofeachmodel. thecheckpointfromthefinaliterationispreserved |
| Trainingisconductedwithabatchsizeof1024and forsubsequentevaluation. |
| | alearningrateof1×10−4. | | | | Theβ,whichcontrols | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ------------------ | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | ----------- | --- | ----- | --- | ------- | |
| | | | | | | | | Supervised | | Fine-Tuning | | (SFT) | | remains | |
| thesparsityregularizationstrength,issetto2. |
| | | | | | | | | a widely | adopted | | approach | | for transferring | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | ------- | --- | -------- | --- | ---------------- | --- | |
| A.2 TrainingSetupforSFTandRL knowledge and desired behaviors from large |
| | | | | | | | | pre-trained | language | | models | to | task-adapted | or | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----------- | -------- | --- | ------ | --- | ------------ | --- | |
| Thissubsectiondetailsthetrainingsetupusedfor |
| | | | | | | | | resource-constrained | | | models. | In | particular, | SFT | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------------- | --- | --- | ------- | --- | ----------- | --- | |
| SFTandRL,includingthedatasets,optimization |
| | | | | | | | | has recently | | been extensively | | used | as a | form of | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------------ | --- | ---------------- | --- | ---- | ---- | ------- | |
| objectives,implementationdetails,andtraininghy- |
| | | | | | | | | reasoning | distillation, | | where | the | intermediate | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------- | ------------- | --- | ----- | --- | ------------ | --- | |
| perparametersforbothparadigms. |
| | | | | | | | | reasoning | processes | | of a stronger | | teacher | model | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------- | --------- | --- | ------------- | --- | ------- | ----- | |
| aredistilledintoasmallerstudentmodelthrough |
| | TrainingDatasets | | | Totrainourmodels,weadopt | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------- | --- | --- | ------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | ------------- | --- | ----------------- | --- | --- | ---------------- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | high-quality, | | teacher-generated | | | chain-of-thought | | |
| thehigh-qualitymathematicsdatasetconstructed |
| byHuanetal.(2025),whichconsistsof47Khigh- annotations(Guoetal.,2025). Byminimizingthe |
| cross-entropylossoncurateddatasets,SFTallows |
| qualitymathematicsproblemsderivedfromMATH |
| | | | | | | | | the model | to | internalize | | desired | behaviors | and | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --------- | --- | ----------- | --- | ------- | --------- | --- | |
| (Hendrycksetal.,2021)andDeepScaler(Luoetal., |
| 2025). Bothtrainingparadigmsareappliedtothe reasoningpatternsinafullysupervisedmanner. In |
| | | | | | | | | our experiments, | | we | employ | the | LLaMA-Factory | | |
| | -------------- | --- | ------------- | --- | --------- | ----- | -------- | ---------------- | ------ | --- | ------- | ----- | ------------- | --- | |
| | same backbone, | | Qwen3-4B-Base | | | and | Qwen2.5- | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | framework | (Zheng | | et al., | 2024) | to fine-tune | the | |
| | 7B. For | RL, | the model | is | optimized | using | stan- | | | | | | | | |
| dardGroupRelativePolicyOptimization(GRPO, twomodelsonteacher-providedchain-of-thought |
| 5×10−5 |
| Shaoetal.,2024),whererewardsarecomputedby traces. The learning rate is set to with |
| | | | | | | | | a batch | size of | 128. | For consistency | | with | the RL | |
| | ------------ | --- | -------- | ----- | ------------ | ------- | ----- | -------- | -------- | ------- | --------------- | --- | ------- | ------ | |
| | comparing | the | model’s | final | answers | against | the | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | setting, | training | is also | performed | | for one | epoch, | |
| | gold answers | | provided | in | the dataset. | This | setup | | | | | | | | |
| strictlysupervisesoutcomecorrectnesswithoutex- andthefinalcheckpointisretainedfordownstream |
| evaluation. |
| posingintermediatereasoningtracestothemodel. |
| AlltrainingrunswereconductedonH200and |
| | For SFT, | the | training | targets | are | complete | chain- | | | | | | | | |
| | ------------------------------------------ | --- | -------- | ------- | --- | -------- | ------ | --------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | of-thought(CoT)reasoningtracesgeneratedbya | | | | | | | H100GPUs. | | | | | | | |
| strongteachermodel,Qwen3-32B-Instruct(Yang |
| A.4 DetailedDescriptionoftheBenchmarks |
| andEvaluationMetrics |
| 1https://huggingface.co/datasets/open- |
| thoughts/OpenThoughts-114k |
| | | | | | | | | In the | experiment, | | we | evaluated | our | models | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------ | ----------- | --- | --- | --------- | --- | ------ | |
| 2https://ai.gitee.com/hf-datasets/togethercomputer/RedPajama- |
| | Data-1T-Sample | | | | | | | on a broad | | range | of benchmarks | | designed | to | |
| | -------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | ----- | ------------- | --- | -------- | --- | |
| |
| probe different aspects of reasoning and gener- • ARC-Challenge (Clark et al., 2018): The |
| alization. These benchmarks can be broadly more difficult subset of the AI2 Reasoning |
| groupedintomathematicalreasoningtasksandnon- Challenge, containing grade-school science |
| mathematicaltasks,whichvaryindomainknowl- questionsthattypicallyrequiremulti-hoprea- |
| edgeandreasoningrequirements. soning and background knowledge integra- |
| tion. |
| | Math reasoning | | tasks | The | following | | bench- | | | | | | | | |
| | -------------- | --- | ----- | --- | --------- | --- | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| marksprimarilyevaluateamodel’sabilitytoper- |
| | | | | | | | | Collectively, | | these | benchmarks | span | a | wide | |
| | --------------- | ---------- | -------- | ------------ | --- | ---------- | ------ | ------------- | ------- | ----- | ---------- | ------ | ----- | ---- | |
| | form explicit | multi-step | | mathematical | | reasoning, | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | range of | domains | and | reasoning | types. | Their | di- | |
| | often requiring | | symbolic | manipulation | | and | struc- | | | | | | | | |
| versityallowsustoprobewhetherimprovements |
| turedproblemsolving. |
| inducedbyRLtrainingreflecttask-specificadapta- |
| • MATH500(Hendrycksetal.,2021): Asub- tionsorgeneral-purposereasoningcapabilitiesthat |
| | setof500problemssampledfromtheMATH | | | | | | | transferacrossdomains. | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| dataset,coveringalgebra,geometry,number WeusedLLM-Evaluation-Harness(Gaoetal., |
| | theory,andcombinatorics. | | | | Eachproblemtyp- | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ------------------------ | --- | --- | --- | --------------- | --- | --- | --------- | -------- | --- | ------- | ----------- | --- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | 2024b) to | evaluate | the | models’ | performance | | on | |
| icallyrequiresmulti-stepderivationsandpre- OpenBookQA,CommonsenseQA,HeadQA,SciQ, |
| cisenumericalorsymbolicanswers. andARC-Challenge,andusedEval-Chemy(Raoof |
| | | | | | | | | et al., 2025) | | to evaluate | the | performance | | on | |
| | -------- | --- | -------- | -------- | --- | ------ | ----- | ------------------------- | --- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | ----------- | --- | |
| | • AIME24 | / | AIME25: | Problems | | drawn | from | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | MATH500,AIME24,andAIME25. | | | | | Inourexper- | | |
| | the 2024 | | and 2025 | editions | | of the | Amer- | | | | | | | | |
| iments,weadoptedexact-matchaccuracytoeval- |
| | ican | Invitational | | Mathematics | | Examination | | | | | | | | | |
| | ---- | ------------ | --- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| uatethemodels’performanceonmathreasoning |
| (AIME).Eachbenchmarkconsistsof30chal- |
| | | | | | | | | tasks. Specifically,forAIME24andAIME25,we | | | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| lengingshort-answerquestionsthatdemand |
| | | | | | | | | averaged | accuracy | on | 10 repetitions. | | For MATH | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------- | -------- | --- | --------------- | --- | -------- | --- | |
| carefulreasoningandmathematicalinsight. |
| 500,ourscoreistheaverageaccuracyover3repe- |
| | Other tasks | The | following | | benchmarks | | assess | | | | | | | | |
| | ----------- | ------------- | --------- | --- | ---------- | --- | ------ | -------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | titions. Forotherbenchmarks,wereportaccuracy | | | | | | | |
| | reasoning | and knowledge | | use | outside | the | mathe- | | | | | | | | |
| followingstandardevaluationprotocols. |
| maticaldomain,makingthemparticularlysuitable |
| | forevaluatinggeneralization. | | | | | | | B MoreExperimentalResults | | | | | | | |
| | ---------------------------- | --- | --------- | --- | --------- | ----------- | ------ | ------------------------- | --- | ---------- | ---------- | --- | ---------- | --- | |
| | • OpenBookQA | | (Mihaylov | | et | al., 2018): | A | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | In this section, | | we present | additional | | experimen- | | |
| | multiple-choice | | question | | answering | | bench- | | | | | | | | |
| talresultsthatcomplementthemainfindingsdis- |
| | mark | focused | on | elementary | | science | knowl- | | | | | | | | |
| | ---- | ------- | --- | ---------- | --- | ------- | ------ | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| cussedinthemainpaper. |
| | edge. | Each | question | is | associated | with | a set | | | | | | | | |
| | ------- | ------ | -------- | --------- | ---------- | ------ | ----- | --------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | of core | facts, | and | the model | must | select | the | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | B.1 FeatureRankShiftsBetweenConsecutive | | | | | | | |
| correctanswerfromfouroptions. |
| Checkpoints |
| • CommonsenseQA (Talmor et al., 2019): A To further examine the dynamics of feature evo- |
| multiple-choice benchmark designed to test lution during training, for each pair of adjacent |
| generalcommonsenseknowledge. Questions checkpoints,wecomputehowmucheachfeature’s |
| are constructed around concepts from struc- rank(basedonNRN)changesfromonecheckpoint |
| | turedknowledgebases,withdistractoroptions | | | | | | | tothenext. | | | | | | | |
| | ----------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| chosentobesemanticallyplausible. Theresults,visualizedinFigure8to11,reveal |
| distinctpatternsforSFTandRL.IntheSFT-tuned |
| | • HeadQA | | (Vilares | and | Gómez-Rodríguez, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | ------------------------------- | -------- | --- | ---------------- | --- | --- | ------------------------------------------ | --------- | ------ | ------ | --- | ------ | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | model, rankchangesbetweenconsecutivecheck- | | | | | | | |
| | 2019): | Amedicalquestionansweringbench- | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | points are | generally | small. | First, | the | number | of | |
| markcomposedofmultiple-choicequestions |
| | | | | | | | | blank features | | is limited, | where | a blank | | feature | |
| | ------- | ---- | ---------- | --- | -------------- | --- | --- | -------------- | --- | ----------- | ----- | ------- | --- | ------- | |
| | derived | from | healthcare | | specialization | | ex- | | | | | | | | |
| denotesonethatappearsinthetop50atonecheck- |
| | ams, | including | questions | | across | pharmacol- | | | | | | | | | |
| | ---- | --------- | --------- | --- | ------ | ---------- | --- | --------- | ----- | ------- | ------- | ----- | ------------ | --- | |
| | | | | | | | | point but | falls | outside | the top | 50 at | the adjacent | | |
| ogy,chemistry,nursing,psychology,biology, |
| | | | | | | | | checkpoint. | Second, | | most features | | exhibit | rela- | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----------- | ------- | --- | ------------- | --- | ------- | ----- | |
| andmedicine. |
| tivelysmallrankshifts,asreflectedbylightercol- |
| • SciQ(Welbletal.,2017): Asciencequestion orsinthevisualization. Moreover,somefeatures |
| answering dataset focusing on elementary- consistentlyappearinthetop50acrossallcheck- |
| levelscientificconcepts. points,indicatingthatcertainSFT-inducedfeatures |
| |
| | | | | Qwen2.5-7B | | | | Qwen2.5-7B-SFT | | | | Qwen2.5-7B-RL | | | |
| | --- | ----- | --- | ---------- | --- | --- | ----- | -------------- | --- | --- | ----- | ------------- | --- | --- | |
| | | 104 | | | | | 104 | | | | 104 | | | | |
| | | 103 | | | | | 103 | | | | 103 | | | | |
| | | tnuoC | | | | | tnuoC | | | | tnuoC | | | | |
| | | 102 | | | | | 102 | | | | 102 | | | | |
| | | 101 | | | | | 101 | | | | 101 | | | | |
| | | 100 | | | | | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 |
| Model Attribution Score Model Attribution Score Model Attribution Score |
| Figure5: DistributionofModelAttributionScoresacrossdifferenttrainingmethodsonQwen2.5-7B. |
| Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-SFT Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-RL Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-SFT Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-RL |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.0 | | 1.0 | |
| | ----- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | ------ | -------------- | --------- | |
| | 104 | | | | 104 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | ckpt-1 1.00 | 0.32 0.28 | 0.33 0.33 | ckpt-1 | 1.00 0.09 0.08 | 0.08 0.06 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.8 | | 0.8 | |
| | 103 | | | | 103 | | | | 0.32 | 1.00 0.45 | 0.45 0.45 | | 0.09 1.00 0.30 | 0.22 0.15 | |
| | tnuoC | | | | tnuoC | | | | ckpt-2 | | | ckpt-2 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.6 | | 0.6 | |
| 102 102 ckpt-3 0.28 0.45 1.00 0.56 0.54 ckpt-3 0.08 0.30 1.00 0.32 0.22 |
| | 101 | | | | 101 | | | | | | | 0.4 | | 0.4 | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----------- | --------- | --------- | ------ | -------------- | --------- | |
| | | | | | | | | | ckpt-4 0.33 | 0.45 0.56 | 1.00 0.72 | ckpt-4 | 0.08 0.22 0.32 | 1.00 0.28 | |
| | 100 | | | | 100 | | | | | | | 0.2 | | 0.2 | |
| 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ckpt-5 0.33 0.45 0.54 0.72 1.00 ckpt-5 0.06 0.15 0.22 0.28 1.00 |
| | | Normalized Relative Norm | | | | Normalized Relative Norm | | | | | | | | | |
| | -------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------- | -------- | ------- | ------------------------ | ------------ | --- | ------------------------------ | ------- | --------- | -------- | ------------------------------ | -------- | |
| | | | | | | | | | ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 | | | 0.0 | ckpt-1ckpt-2ckpt-3ckpt-4ckpt-5 | 0.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Figure 7: | Feature | overlap | heatmaps | across | training | |
| | Figure6: | | DistributionofNormalizedRelativeNorms | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | checkpoints | under | different | | training paradigms | on | |
| | across | different | | training | methods | on | Llama3.1-8B- | | | | | | | | |
| Llama3.1-8B-Instruct. |
| Instruct. |
| | | | | | | | | | model-specific | | features, | while | RL preserves | the | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------- | --- | --------- | ----- | ------------ | --- | |
| areestablishedearlyandpersistthroughouttrain- |
| baserepresentationsandinducesmorerestrained |
| ing. Together,theseobservationssuggestthatSFT |
| | | | | | | | | | feature | changes. | In | addition, | Figure | 7, 12, and | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------- | -------- | --- | --------- | ------ | ---------- | |
| quicklyestablishesarelativelystablehierarchyof |
| | | | | | | | | | 13 show | that | SFT features | | stabilize early | during | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ------- | ---- | ------------ | --- | --------------- | ------ | |
| model-specificfeatures,withlatertrainingprimar- |
| training,whereasRLexhibitsmoregradualfeature |
| ilyrefiningtheirrelativeimportance. |
| evolution. |
| | | By contrast, | | the RL-tuned | | model | exhibits | sub- | | | | | | | |
| | -------------------------------------------- | ------------ | --- | ------------ | --- | ----- | -------- | ---- | ------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | stantiallylargerrankshiftsacrosscheckpoints. | | | | | | | A | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | B.3 AdditionalMASResultsforQwen2.5-7B | | | | | | |
| | large | number | of | features | are | blank | between | ad- | | | | | | | |
| Figure5providesadditionalMASdistributionson |
| | jacent | checkpoints, | | indicating | | frequent | | turnover | | | | | | | |
| | ------ | ------------ | --- | ---------- | --- | -------- | --- | -------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| Qwen2.5-7B.Thesamequalitativetrendspersist: |
| | among | top-ranked | | features. | | Features | frequently | | | | | | | | |
| | ----- | ---------- | --- | --------- | --- | -------- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| SFTinducesaheavilyright-skewedMASdistribu- |
| | undergo | | significant | | reordering, | with | previously | | | | | | | | |
| | ------- | --- | ----------- | --- | ----------- | ---- | ---------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| tionwithmanyhighlyattributedfeatures,whereas |
| prominentfeaturesdiminishinginimportanceand |
| RLresultsinasignificantlyflatterdistributionwith |
| | new | features | rising | to | prominence | | at later | stages. | | | | | | | |
| | --- | -------- | ------ | --- | ---------- | --- | -------- | ------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| fewerstronglymodel-specificfeatures. |
| ThispatternsuggeststhatRL-inducedfeaturesare |
| formedgraduallyandslowly,withtrainingcontin- |
| | | | | | | | | | B.4 GeneralizationtoUnseenTasks. | | | | | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| uouslyadjustingwhichinternalfeaturesaremost |
| Tofurtherevaluatewhethertheidentifiedgeneral- |
| relevantforproducingcorrectoutcomes. |
| | | | | | | | | | ization features | | extend | beyond | the tasks | used for | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------- | --- | ------ | ------ | --------- | -------- | |
| featureidentification,weconductadditionalexper- |
| B.2 ResultsonLlama3.1-8B-Instruct |
| | | | | | | | | | imentsontwounseenbenchmarks: | | | | LogiQA(Liu | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | --- | |
| To evaluate the robustness and generality of our etal., 2021), alogical reasoningbenchmark, and |
| findingsacrossmodelfamilies,weextendouranal- PIQA(Bisketal.,2020),aphysicalcommonsense |
| | ysistoLlama3.1-8B-Instruct. | | | | | Followingthesame | | | | | | | | | |
| | --------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------- | --- | --- | -------- | --------- | ---------- | --- | ----- | ---------- | |
| | | | | | | | | | question | answering | benchmark. | | These | tasks dif- | |
| controlledexperimentalsetupdescribedinSection fersubstantiallyfromtheoriginalevaluationsetin |
| 4,wetrainbothSFT-andRL-tunedmodelsfrom domain and question structure, and are not used |
| thesamebasemodelusingidenticaldata. |
| duringfeatureselection. |
| The results show consistent trends with those Weperformthesamefeature-levelinterventions |
| observed in the Qwen models. As shown in Fig- asinthemainexperiments. Specifically,we(i)set |
| ure 6, SFT introduces a larger number of highly theidentifiedgeneralizationfeaturestozerointhe |
| |
| | Model | | | LogiQA | PIQA | |
| | ------------- | --- | --- | ------ | ----- | |
| | Qwen3-4B-RL | | | -24.5 | -17.6 | |
| | Qwen2.5-7B-RL | | | -24.0 | -11.8 | |
| Table4: Performancedegradationonunseentasksby |
| zeroinggeneralizationfeaturesintheRL-tunedmodel. |
| | Model | | | LogiQA | PIQA | |
| | ------------- | --- | --- | ------ | ----- | |
| | Qwen3-4B-Base | | | +23.3 | +28.2 | |
| | Qwen2.5-7B | | | +24.0 | +32.9 | |
| Table5: Performanceimprovementsonunseentasksby |
| amplifyinggeneralizationfeaturesinthebasemodel. |
| RL-trainedmodels,and(ii)amplifythesamefea- |
| turesinthebasemodels,andevaluateperformance |
| ongeneralization-criticalsamples. |
| | Table | 4 shows | that | zeroing the | generalization | |
| | -------- | ------------- | ---- | ------------ | -------------- | |
| | features | in RL-trained | | models leads | to clear per- | |
| formancedegradationonbothLogiQAandPIQA. |
| Conversely,asshowninTable5,amplifyingthese |
| featuresinthebasemodelsconsistentlyimproves |
| | performanceontheunseentasks. | | | | Theseresultsfur- | |
| | ---------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---------------- | |
| thersupportthattheidentifiedfeaturesimplement |
| ageneral-purposegeneralizationmechanismrather |
| thantask-specificheuristics. |
| |
| Qwen3-4B-SFT |
| 50 |
| | 64 | 64 | 396 | 64 | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | 255 | 255 | 525 | 255 | | |
| 396 |
| | | 396 | 2513 | 396 | | |
| | ---- | ------- | ------- | ------- | --- | |
| | 995 | 995 | 2618 | 525 | | |
| | 1546 | 1546 | | | | |
| | 2513 | | 2685 | 2139 | | |
| | | 2513 | 2955 | | | |
| | 2618 | 2 6 1 8 | | 2513 | | |
| | 2955 | | 3 1 5 2 | 2 6 1 8 | | |
| | 3152 | 2 9 5 5 | 3 5 9 9 | | 40 | |
| | | 3 1 5 2 | | 2 6 8 5 | | |
| | 3290 | | 4 0 5 5 | 2 9 5 5 | | |
| | 3819 | 3 8 1 9 | 4 3 3 7 | | | |
| | | 4 0 5 5 | | 3 1 5 2 | | |
| | 5976 | | 5976 | 3291 | | |
| | 6132 | 4337 | 6857 | | | |
| | 6663 | 6857 | | 3469 | | |
| | | | 7460 | 3599 | | |
| | 6857 | 7460 | 7746 | | | |
| | 7460 | 8271 | | 4337 | 30 | |
| | 7857 | 8865 | 7978 | 5505 | | |
| 8271 |
| | 8520 | 8997 | | 5976 | | |
| | ---- | ------- | ------- | ---- | --- | |
| | 8578 | 9116 | 8865 | | | |
| | 8865 | | 9116 | 6333 | | |
| | | 9281 | | 6857 | | |
| | 8997 | 9286 | 9281 | | | |
| | 9116 | | 9286 | 7746 | | |
| | 9281 | 9402 | | 7883 | | |
| | | 9 5 4 5 | 9 4 0 2 | | | |
| | 9286 | | 9 5 4 5 | 7978 | 20 | |
| | 9545 | 9 8 4 5 | | 8271 | | |
| 10380 9845 )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR |
| | 9845 | 10406 | 10380 | 8520 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ---- | --- | |
| | 10380 | | | 8555 | | |
| | 10406 | 10843 | 10406 | | | |
| | | 11410 | 11410 | 8578 | | |
| 10843 |
| | 11410 | 11928 | 11846 | 8865 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ---- | --- | |
| | 11846 | 11997 | 11928 | 9116 | | |
| 10 |
| | 11928 | 12734 | 11997 | 9281 | | |
| | ---------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 11997 | 12788 | | 9286 | | |
| | 12734 | | 12734 | | | |
| | | 13288 | 13744 | 9545 | | |
| | 12788 | 13744 | | 10380 | | |
| | 13288 | 14080 | 14080 | | | |
| | DI erutaeF 13744 | | 14352 | 10406 | | |
| | | 14352 | | 11410 | | |
| | 13933 | 14381 | 14381 | | | |
| | 14080 | | 14392 | 11846 | | |
| | 14111 | 14392 | | | 0 | |
| | | 14458 | 14458 | 12734 | | |
| | 14336 | | 14545 | 13488 | | |
| | 14392 | 14545 | | | | |
| | | 14688 | 15151 | 13744 | | |
| | 14458 | | 18362 | 14336 | | |
| | 14545 | 15151 | | | | |
| | 14688 | 15762 | 18403 | 14352 | | |
| | | | 18686 | 14392 | | |
| | 15762 | 18299 | | | | |
| | 16834 | 18362 | 18802 | 14458 | 10 | |
| | 18299 | 18403 | 19164 | 14545 | | |
| | 18362 | 18686 | 19325 | 14756 | | |
| | 20826 | 19325 | 19583 | | | |
| | 21495 | | | 18362 | | |
| | | 19583 | 19979 | 18403 | | |
| | 21594 | 19979 | 21495 | | | |
| | 21608 | | | 18686 | | |
| | 21853 | 20826 | 21594 | 18802 | | |
| | | 21495 | 21608 | | | |
| | 21906 | | | 19164 | 20 | |
| | 22103 | 21608 | 21906 | 19325 | | |
| | | 21906 | 22103 | | | |
| | 22152 | 22103 | | 19979 | | |
| | 22629 | | 22152 | 21594 | | |
| | 22773 | 22152 | 22629 | | | |
| | | 22629 | | 21608 | | |
| | 23294 | | 23080 | | | |
| | 23474 | 23474 | 24451 | 22152 | | |
| | 23547 | 24368 | | 22629 | | |
| 24481 |
| | 24368 | 24451 | 25087 | 23080 | 30 | |
| | ----- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --- | |
| | 24804 | 24481 | | 24481 | | |
| | 25087 | | 25291 | | | |
| | | 25087 | 25555 | 25087 | | |
| | 25310 | 25291 | | 25555 | | |
| | 25555 | 2 5 5 5 5 | 26120 | | | |
| | 26101 | | 2 7 1 0 1 | 2 6 1 2 0 | | |
| | | 2 6 1 0 1 | | 2 6 9 2 9 | | |
| | 27101 | 2 6 1 2 0 | 2 7 6 8 1 | | | |
| | 28805 | | 2 7 9 5 4 | 2 7 1 0 1 | | |
| | | 2 7 9 5 4 | | | 40 | |
| | 29122 | 2 8 8 0 5 | 2 8 8 0 5 | 2 7 5 2 0 | | |
| | 29214 | | 29214 | 27681 | | |
| | 29719 | 29122 | | | | |
| | | 29214 | 29485 | 28805 | | |
| | 29721 | | 29719 | 29214 | | |
| | 29792 | 29719 | | | | |
| | 30253 | 29721 | 29721 | 29485 | | |
| | | | 30381 | 29721 | | |
| | 30333 | 30381 | | | | |
| | 32267 | 32507 | 32507 | 30381 | | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure8: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringSFTonQwen3-4B-Base. |
| |
| Qwen3-4B-RL |
| 50 |
| | 254 | 254 | 86 | 86 | | |
| | ---- | ------- | ------- | ------- | --- | |
| | 1520 | 1171 | 158 | 158 | | |
| | 1742 | 1308 | 254 | 254 | | |
| | 1868 | 1520 | 805 | 645 | | |
| | 2117 | 1742 | 1171 | 805 | | |
| | 2357 | 1868 | 1308 | 946 | | |
| | 2537 | | | 1523 | | |
| | 2712 | 1929 | 1929 | 1883 | | |
| | | 2117 | 2357 | | | |
| | 2756 | 2 3 5 7 | 2 4 7 0 | 2 3 5 7 | | |
| | 2792 | 2 4 7 0 | 2 4 9 9 | 2 4 9 9 | 40 | |
| | 3289 | 2537 | 2712 | 2601 | | |
| | 3585 | | 2 7 5 6 | 2 7 1 2 | | |
| | 3609 | 2 7 1 2 | 3 0 0 9 | 2 7 5 6 | | |
| | 4088 | 2 7 5 6 | | 3 0 0 9 | | |
| | 4430 | 3 0 0 9 | 3 0 2 5 | 3 0 2 5 | | |
| | 4967 | 4 0 8 8 | 3 2 1 5 | | | |
| | | 4 4 3 0 | 4 4 3 0 | 3 2 1 5 | | |
| | 4998 | | 4 5 4 7 | 4 4 3 0 | | |
| | 5001 | 4 9 9 8 | 4 9 9 8 | 4 5 4 7 | | |
| | 5120 | 5 0 0 1 | 5 3 3 1 | 4 7 7 4 | 3 0 | |
| | 5286 | 5 2 8 6 | | 5 4 1 0 | | |
| | 5648 | 5 3 3 1 | 5 4 1 0 | 5 5 8 7 | | |
| | 5938 | 5 4 1 0 | 5 5 8 7 | 6 0 6 3 | | |
| | 6000 | 5 6 4 8 | 5 7 3 5 | | | |
| | 6292 | | 6 0 0 0 | 6 2 6 5 | | |
| | | 5 7 3 5 | 6 1 1 5 | 6 4 1 2 | | |
| | 6348 | 5 9 3 8 | 6 2 6 5 | 6 5 1 1 | | |
| | 6663 | 6 0 0 0 | | 6 8 1 6 | | |
| | 6932 | 6 1 1 5 | 6 3 4 8 | 7 1 9 0 | | |
| | 7027 | 6 3 4 8 | 6 8 9 5 | 7 2 8 8 | | |
| | 7038 | | 6 9 6 1 | 7 3 4 9 | 2 0 | |
| | 7524 | 6 6 6 3 | 7 4 9 7 | 7 4 9 7 | | |
| 7878 6 8 9 5 7 5 2 4 )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR |
| | 8080 | 6 9 3 2 | 7 5 3 2 | 7 7 2 6 | | |
| | ---------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --- | |
| | | 6 9 6 1 | | 8 9 9 9 | | |
| | 8183 | 7 0 3 8 | 7 6 9 5 | 9 2 5 9 | | |
| | 8329 | | 7 7 2 6 | 9 2 8 6 | | |
| | 9253 | 7 5 2 4 | 8 4 3 6 | 9 6 3 6 | | |
| | 9286 | 7 5 3 2 | 8 7 3 3 | 10 0 3 8 | | |
| | 9372 | 7695 | 9259 | 10471 | | |
| | 10558 | 7878 | 9286 | | 10 | |
| | 10684 | 8080 | | 10737 | | |
| | 10737 | | 10471 | 11007 | | |
| | | 8183 | 10695 | 11262 | | |
| | 11007 | 8436 | 10737 | 12086 | | |
| | 11766 | 8733 | 10803 | 13220 | | |
| | 12146 | 9286 | 11262 | 13931 | | |
| | DI erutaeF 12296 | 10558 | 12086 | 14540 | | |
| | 12583 | 10684 | 13220 | | | |
| | 13422 | | | 14798 | | |
| | 13568 | 10695 | 13931 | 15448 | | |
| | 14101 | 10803 | 14563 | 15656 | 0 | |
| | | 11262 | 15448 | 15755 | | |
| | 14449 | 12086 | 15656 | 15840 | | |
| | 14609 | 12296 | 15755 | 16458 | | |
| | 14798 | | 15840 | 16814 | | |
| | 15448 | 13568 | | | | |
| | 15840 | 14449 | 16458 | 17012 | | |
| | 16655 | 14563 | 17315 | 17315 | | |
| | 16847 | 15448 | 17703 | 17881 | | |
| | 17061 | 15755 | 17821 | 18729 | | |
| | | | 17881 | 18766 | 10 | |
| | 17276 | 15840 | 18729 | 19527 | | |
| | 17315 | 16655 | | 1 9 8 1 5 | | |
| | 17317 | 1 7 3 1 5 | 1 8 7 6 6 | 2 1 2 2 6 | | |
| | 17480 | 1 7 4 8 0 | 1 9 5 2 7 | | | |
| | 17703 | 1 7 7 0 3 | 1 9 5 8 3 | 2 1 2 8 7 | | |
| | 17881 | 1 7 8 2 1 | 2 0 8 1 9 | 2 1 4 2 2 | | |
| | 18415 | | 2 1 2 2 6 | 2 1 5 1 3 | | |
| | 18575 | 1 8 8 1 1 | 2 1 4 2 2 | 2 1 5 1 4 | | |
| | | 1 9 5 8 3 | | 2 1 7 0 2 | | |
| | 18721 | 1 9 8 1 5 | 2 1 4 8 8 | 2 1 7 5 5 | | |
| | 18811 | 2 0 6 7 6 | 2 1 6 2 7 | 2 1 9 4 5 | 2 0 | |
| | 19072 | 2 0 8 1 9 | 2 1 6 6 1 | | | |
| | 19527 | | 2 1 7 0 2 | 2 2 0 8 3 | | |
| | 19815 | 2 1 2 8 7 | 2 2 0 8 3 | 2 2 7 4 6 | | |
| | 19966 | 2 1 4 2 2 | 2 2 9 1 9 | 2 3 0 1 1 | | |
| | 20676 | 2 1 4 8 8 | | 2 3 0 6 9 | | |
| | 20910 | 2 1 6 2 7 | 2 3 0 1 1 | 2 3 1 9 2 | | |
| | | 2 1 6 6 1 | 2 3 0 6 9 | 2 3 8 2 4 | | |
| | 21287 | | 2 3 1 9 2 | 2 3 8 7 2 | | |
| | 21661 | 2 1 7 0 2 | 2 3 9 5 6 | | | |
| | 21702 | 2 2 9 1 9 | 2 4 3 4 1 | 2 3 9 5 6 | | |
| | 22919 | 2 3 0 6 9 | 2 4 3 6 8 | 2 4 3 6 8 | 3 0 | |
| | 23192 | 2 3 1 9 2 | | 2 4 4 7 4 | | |
| | 23220 | 2 3 9 5 6 | 2 4 4 1 5 | 2 4 9 9 8 | | |
| | 23956 | 2 4 3 4 1 | 2 4 9 9 8 | 2 5 0 0 9 | | |
| | 24243 | | 2 5 0 0 9 | 2 5 4 1 4 | | |
| | | 2 4 3 9 8 | 2 5 4 1 4 | 2 6 0 8 0 | | |
| | 24341 | 2 4 4 1 5 | 2 6 0 8 0 | 2 6 1 5 1 | | |
| | 24398 | 2 4 9 9 8 | 2 6 2 1 3 | | | |
| | 24931 | 25049 | 26891 | 2 6 8 9 1 | | |
| | 25049 | 2 5 5 5 4 | | 27486 | | |
| | 25554 | | 2 7 4 8 6 | 2 7 5 4 9 | 40 | |
| | 27347 | 2 6 0 8 0 | 2 7 5 4 9 | 2 8 6 1 3 | | |
| | 27468 | 26213 | 27704 | 28854 | | |
| | 27486 | 27486 | 28613 | 29081 | | |
| | 27505 | 27505 | 29081 | 29147 | | |
| | | 27704 | 29147 | | | |
| | 28613 | | | 30542 | | |
| | 28699 | 29081 | 29155 | 31350 | | |
| | 29146 | 29155 | 30803 | 31817 | | |
| | 30400 | 30400 | 31817 | 31903 | | |
| | 30542 | 30803 | 31903 | 32219 | | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure9: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringRLonQwen3-4B-Base. |
| |
| Qwen2.5-7B-SFT |
| 50 |
| | 15 | 440 | 440 | 15 | | |
| | ---- | ------- | ---- | ---- | --- | |
| | 440 | 659 | 1097 | 440 | | |
| | 646 | 1097 | | | | |
| | | 1 2 2 1 | 1221 | 1097 | | |
| | 659 | | 1542 | 1221 | | |
| | 1097 | 1 8 9 5 | 1895 | | | |
| | 1221 | 1962 | | 1542 | | |
| | | 2241 | 1962 | 1962 | | |
| | 1962 | 2332 | 2241 | 2241 | | |
| 2241 |
| | 2842 | 2689 | 2332 | 2332 | 40 | |
| | ---------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------------- | |
| | | 2842 | 2613 | 2613 | | |
| | 3203 | 3 2 0 3 | | | | |
| | 5331 | 5 3 5 8 | 2 6 8 9 | 2 6 8 9 | | |
| | | | 2 8 4 2 | 3 2 0 3 | | |
| | 5660 | 5 5 9 9 | 3203 | | | |
| | 5824 | 5660 | | 5797 | | |
| | 6184 | 5797 | 5358 | 6184 | | |
| | | 6184 | 5599 | | | |
| | 6323 | | | 6437 | | |
| | 7213 | 6323 | 5797 | 7213 | 30 | |
| | 8117 | 6974 | 6184 | | | |
| | | 7213 | | 7542 | | |
| | 8509 | 8509 | 6974 | 7898 | | |
| | 8642 | | 7213 | | | |
| | 9534 | 8642 | 7542 | 8117 | | |
| | | 9534 | | 8509 | | |
| | 10583 | 10583 | 8117 | | | |
| | 10893 | | 8509 | 9761 | | |
| | 11186 | 10893 | | 10583 | | |
| | | 10934 | 9761 | | | |
| | 12220 | 11186 | 10893 | 10893 | 20 | |
| | 12502 | 12220 | | 11525 | | |
| | | | 10934 | 11674 | )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR | |
| | 12698 | 13717 | 11674 | | | |
| | 13744 | 13744 | 12698 | 12698 | | |
| | 13748 | 1 3 7 4 8 | | 1 3 6 0 5 | | |
| | | 1 3 9 9 1 | 1 3 7 1 7 | | | |
| | 14301 | | 1 3 9 9 1 | 1 3 7 1 7 | | |
| | 14697 | 1 4 3 0 1 | | 14906 | | |
| | 14906 | 14697 | 14906 | | | |
| | | 15353 | 14914 | 14914 | 10 | |
| | 15258 | 15455 | | 15258 | | |
| | 15353 | | 15258 | | | |
| | 15455 | 15757 | 15353 | 15353 | | |
| | | 16099 | 16099 | 16099 | | |
| | 15757 | 1 6 1 5 1 | | | | |
| | 16008 | 1 6 2 7 3 | 16151 | 16715 | | |
| | DI erutaeF 16273 | | 16361 | 16991 | | |
| 16361 |
| | 16715 | 16715 | 16715 | 17819 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 17073 | 16991 | 16991 | 18508 | | |
| | 17819 | 17819 | | | 0 | |
| | | | 17819 | 19264 | | |
| | 18403 | 18508 | 18508 | 19340 | | |
| | 18700 | 18700 | 18719 | 19998 | | |
| 1 8 7 1 9 |
| | 18719 | 1 9 2 6 4 | 19264 | 20148 | | |
| | ----- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --- | |
| | 19264 | | 19340 | 20637 | | |
| | 19340 | 19340 | | | | |
| | | 19998 | 19998 | 20642 | | |
| | 19998 | 20070 | 20148 | 20821 | | |
| | 20070 | | | | 10 | |
| | 20146 | 20146 | 20510 | 21823 | | |
| | | 20148 | 20637 | 22681 | | |
| | 20148 | 2 0 2 7 4 | 2 0 6 4 2 | | | |
| | 20274 | 2 0 5 1 0 | | 2 2 8 7 4 | | |
| | 21359 | | 2 0 8 2 1 | 2 3 2 3 1 | | |
| | | 2 2 1 2 8 | 21823 | | | |
| | 22128 | 22173 | | 23472 | | |
| | 22880 | 22880 | 22173 | 23515 | | |
| | 23221 | 23231 | 22681 | | | |
| 23920 |
| | 23231 | 23472 | 22874 | 24699 | 20 | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 23472 | 23637 | 23231 | | | |
| | | 24299 | 23637 | 25727 | | |
| | 25339 | 24418 | | 26051 | | |
| | 25727 | | 23920 | | | |
| | 25787 | 25727 | 24299 | 26279 | | |
| | | 26051 | | 26506 | | |
| | 26051 | 26613 | 24418 | 26613 | | |
| | 26385 | 27227 | 24699 | | | |
| | 26613 | | | 27550 | | |
| | | 27738 | 25727 | 27678 | | |
| | 27738 | 27778 | 26051 | | 30 | |
| | 27778 | 28651 | 27227 | 27778 | | |
| | 28651 | 28732 | | 28937 | | |
| 27550 |
| | 28791 | 29009 | 27778 | 29009 | | |
| | ----- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --- | |
| | 28937 | 2 9 2 7 6 | | 2 9 4 0 7 | | |
| | 29448 | 2 9 4 0 7 | 2 8 7 3 2 | | | |
| | | 2 9 4 4 8 | 2 9 0 0 9 | 2 9 6 3 3 | | |
| | 29660 | | | 30264 | | |
| | 29835 | 29633 | 29276 | | | |
| | | 29660 | 29407 | 30659 | 40 | |
| | 30264 | 29835 | 29448 | 31036 | | |
| 30613 |
| | 30659 | 30264 | 29633 | 31931 | | |
| | ----- | --------- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | | 30659 | 30264 | 31945 | | |
| | 30984 | 3 0 9 8 4 | | | | |
| | 31723 | 3 1 1 3 4 | 30659 | 32061 | | |
| | 31945 | | 31134 | 32113 | | |
| | | 31723 | | 32232 | | |
| | 32232 | 32232 | 31931 | | | |
| | 32521 | 32521 | 31945 | 32735 | | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure10: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringSFTonQwen2.5-7B. |
| |
| Qwen2.5-7B-RL |
| 50 |
| | 521 | 459 | 267 | 267 | | |
| | ---------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------------------------------------------------- | |
| | 710 | 521 | 459 | 710 | | |
| | 1175 | 710 | 710 | 845 | | |
| | 1202 | 1175 | 845 | | | |
| | 1307 | 1202 | | 864 | | |
| | 1802 | | 1030 | 1030 | | |
| | 2277 | 2514 | 1175 | 1175 | | |
| | 2514 | 2613 | 2558 | 2277 | | |
| | 2613 | 3 5 8 7 | 2 6 1 3 | | | |
| | 3587 | 3 6 2 7 | | 2 5 5 8 | | |
| | | 3 6 5 0 | 3 5 8 7 | 2 5 7 8 | 40 | |
| | 3650 | | 3 6 2 7 | 2 6 1 3 | | |
| | 3676 | 3 6 7 6 | 3 6 5 0 | | | |
| | 3683 | 3 6 8 3 | 3 6 7 6 | 3 2 0 3 | | |
| | 5393 | 3 7 9 4 | | 3 5 8 7 | | |
| | 5960 | 5 4 2 3 | 3 6 8 3 | 3 6 5 0 | | |
| | 6062 | | 3 7 9 4 | | | |
| | 6153 | 6062 | 5 4 2 3 | 3676 | | |
| | 6267 | 6 1 5 3 | 6 0 6 2 | 3 6 8 3 | | |
| | 6836 | 6 2 6 7 | | 4 3 9 3 | | |
| | 7039 | 6 9 2 5 | 6 1 5 3 | 5 3 5 8 | 30 | |
| | | 7 2 7 9 | 6 1 7 7 | | | |
| | 7193 | | 6 9 2 5 | 5 4 2 3 | | |
| | 7368 | 7 3 6 8 | 7 2 7 9 | 5 4 6 4 | | |
| | 7427 | 7 4 2 7 | | 6 0 6 2 | | |
| | 7675 | 7 4 4 1 | 7 4 2 7 | | | |
| | 7778 | 9005 | 7441 | 6153 | | |
| | 7788 | | 8385 | 6177 | | |
| | 7926 | 9375 | | 6925 | | |
| | 8706 | 10688 | 9005 | | | |
| | 8752 | 10774 | 10688 | 7246 | | |
| | 9375 | 10875 | 10774 | 7279 | 20 | |
| | | 10908 | 11049 | 7427 | | |
| | 9552 | | | | )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR | |
| | 9703 | 11327 | 11327 | 7441 | | |
| | 9961 | 11496 | 11496 | 8385 | | |
| | 10167 | 11570 | 11570 | 8533 | | |
| | 10610 | 11580 | 11580 | 10688 | | |
| | 10875 | 11892 | | | | |
| | 10908 | | 11671 | 10788 | | |
| | 11496 | 12020 | 11892 | 11049 | | |
| | 11570 | 12400 | 12400 | 11671 | 10 | |
| | 11892 | 12702 | 12702 | | | |
| | | 1 3 3 4 6 | | 11892 | | |
| | 12020 | | 1 3 0 6 9 | 1 2 7 0 2 | | |
| | 12702 | 1 3 3 7 1 | 1 3 3 4 6 | 1 3 0 6 9 | | |
| | 12882 | 1 3 7 9 1 | 1 3 3 7 1 | | | |
| | 13371 | 1 3 8 1 7 | 1 3 8 1 7 | 1 3 3 4 6 | | |
| | DI erutaeF 13791 | 1 5 0 0 7 | | 1 3 3 7 1 | | |
| | 15007 | 1 5 4 6 7 | 1 5 4 6 7 | 1 4 0 3 3 | | |
| | 15345 | | 1 5 4 7 0 | | | |
| | 15470 | 1 5 4 7 0 | 1 5 6 8 9 | 1 4 9 8 3 | | |
| | 15680 | 15680 | 1 5 9 3 1 | 15467 | 0 | |
| | 15931 | 1 5 6 8 9 | | 1 5 4 7 0 | | |
| | | 1 5 9 3 1 | 1 6 0 0 2 | 1 5 9 3 1 | | |
| | 16099 | 1 6 0 9 9 | 1 6 0 9 9 | | | |
| | 16353 | | 1 6 3 5 3 | 1 5 9 4 7 | | |
| | 16537 | 1 6 3 5 3 | 1 7 2 6 6 | 1 6 0 0 2 | | |
| | 17464 | 1 6 5 3 7 | | 1 6 0 9 9 | | |
| | 17472 | 1 7 2 6 6 | 1 7 4 5 9 | | | |
| | 18289 | 1 7 4 5 9 | 1 7 4 7 2 | 1 6 3 5 3 | | |
| | 18372 | | 18189 | 17266 | | |
| | 18785 | 17472 | | 17472 | 10 | |
| | 18937 | 18189 | 18372 | | | |
| | 19623 | 18372 | 18785 | 18189 | | |
| | | 18785 | 20784 | 18289 | | |
| | 19676 | 20784 | 20937 | 18372 | | |
| | 21258 | | | 18785 | | |
| | 21547 | 20937 | 21022 | | | |
| | 22441 | 21258 | 21072 | 20937 | | |
| | 22489 | 22154 | 21258 | 21022 | | |
| | 22830 | 22277 | 21596 | 21072 | | |
| | 22953 | 22441 | | | | |
| | 23117 | | 21961 | 21258 | 20 | |
| | 23640 | 22743 | 22014 | 21596 | | |
| | 23652 | 23117 | 22154 | 21961 | | |
| | | 23502 | 22173 | | | |
| | 23797 | 23652 | | 22014 | | |
| | 24032 | | 22277 | 22173 | | |
| | 24447 | 2 3 7 9 7 | 2 2 7 4 3 | 2 3 1 1 7 | | |
| | 24506 | 2 4 8 8 2 | 2 3 1 1 7 | | | |
| | 24882 | 2 5 5 3 9 | 2 3 5 0 2 | 2 3 6 4 8 | | |
| | 24988 | 2 5 5 7 1 | | 2 3 6 5 2 | | |
| | 25079 | 2 5 8 3 9 | 2 3 6 4 8 | 2 4 8 8 2 | | |
| | 25155 | | 2 3 6 5 2 | 2 5 8 3 9 | 30 | |
| | 25839 | 2 6 0 5 1 | 2 4 8 8 2 | | | |
| | | 2 6 6 2 1 | 2 5 5 3 9 | 2 5 9 2 0 | | |
| | 26393 | 26760 | | 26051 | | |
| | 26453 | 2 7 0 3 5 | 2 5 5 7 1 | 2 6 2 2 4 | | |
| | 26621 | 2 7 0 5 7 | 2 5 8 3 9 | | | |
| | 26760 | | 2 5 9 2 0 | 2 6 3 2 4 | | |
| | 27057 | 2 7 2 8 5 | 2 6 0 5 1 | 2 6 8 7 3 | | |
| | 28734 | 2 9 1 6 8 | | 2 7 0 5 7 | | |
| | 28964 | 2 9 3 0 2 | 2 6 2 2 4 | | | |
| | 29006 | 2 9 5 3 8 | 2 7 0 3 5 | 2 7 1 3 9 | 40 | |
| | 29168 | | 2 7 0 5 7 | 2 8 1 5 1 | | |
| | 29302 | 2 9 9 2 4 | | 29039 | | |
| | | 30109 | 27285 | | | |
| | 29538 | 30419 | 29168 | 29168 | | |
| | 30109 | 30615 | 29302 | 29302 | | |
| | 30615 | 30902 | 29924 | 30123 | | |
| | 30902 | | | 30574 | | |
| | 30992 | 31384 | 30419 | | | |
| | 31384 | 31423 | 30574 | 30661 | | |
| | 31423 | 31896 | 31896 | 32311 | | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure11: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringRLonQwen2.5-7B. |
| |
| Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-SFT |
| 50 |
| | 279 | 279 | 567 | 567 | | |
| | ---- | ------- | ------- | ---- | --- | |
| | 1000 | 567 | 779 | | | |
| | 1097 | | | 1000 | | |
| | | 779 | 1000 | | | |
| | 1621 | 1 0 0 0 | | 1097 | | |
| | 1741 | | 1 0 9 7 | 1103 | | |
| | | 1 1 0 3 | 1 1 0 3 | | | |
| | 1923 | 1621 | | 1621 | | |
| | 2190 | | 1621 | | | |
| | 2691 | 2190 | | 2190 | | |
| | | 2447 | 2190 | | 40 | |
| | 3242 | | 2447 | 2691 | | |
| | 5351 | 3468 | | | | |
| | | | 2691 | 2856 | | |
| | 6202 | 5351 | | 3009 | | |
| | 6531 | 6202 | 3009 | | | |
| | 6612 | | 3468 | 3468 | | |
| 6612 |
| | 6869 | 6869 | 6202 | 6202 | | |
| | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | |
| 7682 |
| | | 7682 | 6612 | 6612 | 30 | |
| | ----- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | |
| | 7838 | 7838 | 6869 | | | |
| | 8523 | | | 6869 | | |
| | 9123 | 8523 | 6973 | | | |
| | | 9123 | | 6973 | | |
| | 9671 | | 7682 | 8445 | | |
| | 10434 | 9309 | 9123 | | | |
| | 10456 | 9671 | | 9123 | | |
| 9309 |
| | 10613 | 9787 | | 9309 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | --- | |
| | 10759 | 10434 | 9671 | | | |
| | | | 9787 | 9671 | 20 | |
| | 11288 | 10759 | | | | |
| 11442 11288 9904 9904 )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR |
| | 11879 | | 10434 | | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | | 11442 | | 10434 | | |
| | 11955 | 11952 | 10759 | 11288 | | |
| 12133 |
| | | 12145 | 11288 | 12145 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 12145 | | 11952 | | | |
| | 12225 | 12225 | | 12849 | | |
| | 12697 | 12697 | 12145 | | 10 | |
| 13184 |
| | 12849 | 12849 | 12849 | | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 13086 | 13184 | 13184 | 13418 | | |
| 14114 |
| | 13184 | 13418 | 13418 | | | |
| | ---------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 13418 | 13759 | | 14665 | | |
| | DI erutaeF 13759 | | 14114 | | | |
| | | 14114 | 14665 | 15079 | | |
| | 14114 | 14255 | | | | |
| | 14255 | | 15079 | 15467 | | |
| | | 14665 | | | 0 | |
| | 14406 | 15079 | 15467 | 15655 | | |
| | 14665 | | 15655 | | | |
| | 15079 | 15655 | | 16296 | | |
| | | 16296 | 16296 | 17043 | | |
| 15253 |
| | 15655 | 17309 | 17043 | 17309 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 16296 | 17425 | 17309 | | | |
| 17425 |
| | 17205 | 17459 | 17425 | | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 17309 | | | 17947 | 10 | |
| | | 18341 | 17459 | | | |
| | 17411 | 18567 | 17947 | 18341 | | |
| | 17425 | | | 18567 | | |
| | 18341 | 18992 | 18567 | | | |
| | | 19299 | | 19071 | | |
| | 18439 | | 18992 | | | |
| | 18496 | 19499 | 19071 | 19299 | | |
| 19821 |
| | 18567 | | 19299 | 19499 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 19299 | 21141 | 19499 | | | |
| | 19499 | 21365 | | 19821 | 20 | |
| 20918 |
| | 19821 | 21720 | | 20918 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 21365 | 21945 | 21141 | 21141 | | |
| 21365 |
| | 21945 | 22513 | | 21365 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 22513 | 22754 | 21720 | | | |
| | 22754 | | | 21720 | | |
| | | 23231 | 21945 | | | |
| | 23396 | 23396 | 22513 | 21945 | | |
| 24038 |
| | | 23408 | 22754 | 22513 | 30 | |
| | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| 25051 |
| | 25511 | 25051 | 23231 | 22754 | | |
| | ----- | --------- | --------- | ----- | --- | |
| | 26064 | 25511 | 23396 | 23396 | | |
| | 26389 | 26064 | 23408 | 25511 | | |
| | 29460 | 26389 | | | | |
| | 29627 | | 25511 | 26064 | | |
| | | 29501 | 26064 | | | |
| | 29728 | 29627 | | 26389 | | |
| | 29989 | | 26389 | | 40 | |
| | | 29728 | | 26978 | | |
| | 30060 | 29989 | 26978 | 27663 | | |
| | 30151 | | 2 9 5 0 1 | | | |
| | 30216 | 3 0 0 6 0 | | 27982 | | |
| | | 3 0 1 5 1 | 2 9 6 2 7 | | | |
| | 30518 | | | 29627 | | |
| | 31003 | 30216 | 29728 | | | |
| | | 30518 | 30151 | 29728 | | |
| 31774 |
| | 32628 | 31003 | 31003 | 30151 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure12: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringSFTonLlama3.1-8B-Instruct. |
| |
| Llama3.1-8b-Instruct-RL |
| 50 |
| | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | | |
| | 15 | 9 | 5 | 7 | | |
| 17 |
| | 18 | 15 | 7 | 8 | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | |
| | 21 | 17 | 8 | 16 | | |
| | 22 | | | 18 | | |
| | | 18 | 9 | | | |
| | 23 | 21 | 16 | 21 | | |
| | 28 | 22 | 17 | 22 | | |
| | 30 | | | 23 | 40 | |
| | 31 | 23 | 22 | | | |
| | 32 | 24 | 23 | 24 | | |
| | 34 | 28 | | 31 | | |
| | 35 | | 24 | | | |
| | | 30 | 30 | 32 | | |
| | 38 | 31 | 31 | 33 | | |
| | 45 | 32 | | 34 | | |
| | 54 | | 32 | | | |
| | 55 | 34 | 33 | 35 | | |
| | 58 | 35 | | 37 | 30 | |
| | 63 | | 34 | 38 | | |
| | | 37 | 35 | | | |
| | 67 | 38 | 37 | 39 | | |
| | 71 | 54 | | 42 | | |
| | 74 | | 38 | 45 | | |
| | 86 | 55 | 39 | | | |
| | 88 | 57 | 45 | 49 | | |
| | 97 | 5 8 | | 5 2 | | |
| | 100 | | 4 9 | 5 3 | | |
| | | 6 3 | 5 5 | | | |
| | 101 | 6 8 | | 5 4 | 2 0 | |
| | 106 | | 5 7 | 5 5 | | |
| 107 6 9 6 2 )regnorts = evitagen ,rekaew = evitisop( tfihS knaR |
| | 108 | 7 1 | 6 3 | 5 7 | | |
| | -------------- | ----- | ----- | ------ | --- | |
| | 113 | 7 3 | | 5 8 | | |
| | 120 | | 6 8 | 6 2 | | |
| | 123 | 7 4 | 6 9 | | | |
| | | 8 5 | | 6 3 | | |
| | 128 | 8 6 | 7 0 | 6 6 | | |
| | 129 | | 7 1 | 6 8 | | |
| | 133 | 8 7 | 7 3 | | 1 0 | |
| | 134 | 8 8 | | 7 0 | | |
| | 136 | | 7 4 | 7 3 | | |
| | 138 | 9 1 | 8 2 | 7 4 | | |
| | 145 | 9 7 | | | | |
| | | 100 | 85 | 81 | | |
| | 148 | | 86 | 82 | | |
| | DI erutaeF 150 | 106 | 87 | 84 | | |
| | 162 | 113 | | | | |
| | 179 | 114 | 88 | 85 | | |
| | 180 | | 91 | 86 | | |
| | 182 | 115 | | 87 | 0 | |
| | | 116 | 97 | | | |
| | 199 | | 100 | 88 | | |
| | 200 | 120 | 105 | 90 | | |
| | 203 | 123 | | | | |
| | 207 | 125 | 106 | 91 | | |
| | 211 | | 108 | 93 | | |
| | 214 | 1 2 8 | 1 1 3 | 9 7 | | |
| | 217 | 1 2 9 | | | | |
| | | 1 3 3 | 1 1 4 | 1 0 2 | | |
| | 219 | | 1 1 5 | 1 0 5 | 1 0 | |
| | 221 | 1 3 4 | | 1 0 6 | | |
| | 236 | 1 3 6 | 1 1 6 | | | |
| | 238 | | 1 2 0 | 1 0 8 | | |
| | 248 | 1 3 8 | 1 2 3 | 1 1 3 | | |
| | 254 | 1 4 5 | | 1 1 4 | | |
| | 270 | 1 4 7 | 1 2 5 | | | |
| | | | 1 2 9 | 1 1 5 | | |
| | 281 | 1 4 8 | | 1 1 6 | | |
| | 287 | 1 5 5 | 1 3 3 | 1 2 0 | | |
| | 298 | 1 6 2 | 1 3 4 | | | |
| | 323 | | 1 3 6 | 1 2 3 | 2 0 | |
| | 346 | 1 7 9 | | 1 2 5 | | |
| | 350 | 1 8 0 | 1 4 5 | | | |
| | | | 147 | 16 1 0 | | |
| | 353 | 182 | | 1988 | | |
| | 374 | 200 | 148 | 2691 | | |
| | 379 | 203 | 155 | | | |
| | 382 | | 162 | 3029 | | |
| | 394 | 211 | | 4727 | | |
| | 400 | 214 | 179 | 6973 | | |
| | 408 | 219 | 1610 | | | |
| | | | | 8063 | 30 | |
| | 415 | 221 | 1988 | 10930 | | |
| | 420 | 236 | 2050 | 12982 | | |
| | 423 | | 3029 | | | |
| | 425 | 238 | | 13600 | | |
| | 432 | 248 | 4511 | 14665 | | |
| | 433 | 254 | 6973 | 15248 | | |
| | 445 | | 8063 | | | |
| | | 1610 | | 20405 | | |
| | 446 | 1988 | 9962 | 21376 | | |
| | 447 | 2050 | 10930 | | 40 | |
| | 454 | | | 25051 | | |
| | 456 | 4511 | 12982 | 25831 | | |
| | 464 | 6973 | 14665 | 26510 | | |
| | 486 | | 18247 | | | |
| | | 9962 | | 26761 | | |
| | 501 | 10930 | 21376 | 27913 | | |
| | 505 | 18247 | 27913 | 30507 | | |
| 6973 |
| | 30591 | 30591 | 30591 | 30591 | | |
| | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | |
| | 32100 | 32100 | 32100 | 32100 | | |
| 50 |
| ckpt-2-to-ckpt-1 Rank Shift ckpt-3-to-ckpt-2 Rank Shift ckpt-4-to-ckpt-3 Rank Shift ckpt-5-to-ckpt-4 Rank Shift |
| Figure13: FeaturerankshiftacrossadjacentcheckpointsduringRLonLlama3.1-8B-Instruct. |