| INTRODUCING THE WINDOWS AZURE |
| PLATFORM |
|
|
| DAVID CHAPPELL |
|
|
| OCTOBER 2010 |
|
|
| SPONSORED BY MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
|
|
| CONTENTS |
|
|
| An Overview of the Windows Azure Platform ....................................................................................... 3 |
|
|
| Windows Azure ........................................................................................................................................ 4 |
|
|
| SQL Azure ................................................................................................................................................. 6 |
|
|
| Windows Azure AppFabric....................................................................................................................... 8 |
|
|
| Windows Azure MarketPlace .................................................................................................................. 9 |
|
|
| A Closer Look at the Technologies ....................................................................................................... 10 |
|
|
| Windows Azure ...................................................................................................................................... 10 |
|
|
| Compute ............................................................................................................................................ 11 |
|
|
| Storage .............................................................................................................................................. 12 |
|
|
| Fabric Controller ................................................................................................................................ 14 |
|
|
| Content Delivery Network ................................................................................................................. 14 |
|
|
| Connect ............................................................................................................................................. 15 |
|
|
| SQL Azure ............................................................................................................................................... 15 |
|
|
| Database ........................................................................................................................................... 15 |
|
|
| Reporting ........................................................................................................................................... 17 |
|
|
| Data Sync .......................................................................................................................................... 17 |
|
|
| Windows Azure AppFabric..................................................................................................................... 19 |
|
|
| Service Bus ........................................................................................................................................ 19 |
|
|
| Access Control ................................................................................................................................... 21 |
|
|
| Caching .............................................................................................................................................. 23 |
|
|
| Windows Azure Marketplace ................................................................................................................ 24 |
|
|
| Looking Ahead .................................................................................................................................... 26 |
|
|
| Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 26 |
|
|
| About the Author ................................................................................................................................ 27 |
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
| AN OVERVIEW OF THE WINDOWS AZURE PLATFORM |
|
|
| Using computers in the cloud can make lots of sense. Rather than buying and maintaining your own |
| machines, why not exploit the acres of Internet-accessible servers on offer today? For some applications, |
| both code and data might live in the cloud, where somebody else manages and maintains the systems |
| they use. Alternatively, applications that run inside an organization—on-premises applications—might |
| store data in the cloud or rely on other cloud infrastructure services. However it’s done, exploiting the |
| cloud’s capabilities can improve our world. |
|
|
| But whether an application runs in the cloud, uses services provided by the cloud, or both, some kind of |
| application platform is required. Viewed broadly, an application platform can be thought of as anything |
| that provides developer-accessible services for creating applications or storing data. In the on-premises |
| Windows world, this includes technologies such as Windows Server and SQL Server. To let applications |
| exploit the cloud, a cloud application platform must also exist. |
|
|
| This is exactly what the Microsoft Windows Azure platform provides. It’s a group of cloud technologies, |
| each providing a specific set of services to application developers. Figure 1 shows its components. |
|
|
| Figure 1: The Windows Azure platform supports applications, data, and infrastructure in the cloud, |
| together with a cloud marketplace. |
|
|
| The Windows Azure platform today has four parts: |
|
|
| Windows Azure: A Windows environment for running applications and storing data on computers in |
|
|
| Microsoft data centers. |
|
|
| SQL Azure: Relational data services in the cloud based on SQL Server. |
|
|
| Windows Azure AppFabric: Cloud-based infrastructure services for applications running in the cloud |
|
|
| or on premises. |
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
| Windows Azure Marketplace: An online service for purchasing cloud-based data and applications. |
|
|
| All four of these components run in Microsoft data centers located around the world: two in North |
| America, two in Europe, and two in Asia. Developers using the platform can control which data center |
| runs their applications and stores their data, giving them the ability to place both closer to their users. |
|
|
| Each part of the Windows Azure platform has its own role to play. This overview describes all four, first at |
| a high level, then in a bit more detail. The goal is to provide a big-picture introduction to this cloud |
| platform. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE |
|
|
| At a high level, Windows Azure is simple to understand: It runs Windows applications and stores data in |
| the cloud. Figure 2 shows its components. |
|
|
| Figure 2: Windows Azure provides compute and storage services in the cloud. |
|
|
| The five parts of Windows Azure today are the following: |
|
|
| Compute: The Windows Azure compute service runs applications on a Windows Server foundation. |
| These applications can be created using the .NET Framework in languages such as C# and Visual Basic, |
| or they can be built without .NET in C++, Java, and other languages. Developers can use Visual Studio |
| or other development tools, and they’re free to use technologies such as ASP.NET, Windows |
| Communication Foundation (WCF), and PHP. |
|
|
| Storage: This service allows storing binary large objects (blobs), provides queues for communication |
| between components of Windows Azure applications, and even offers a form of tables with a simple |
| query language. (Windows Azure applications that need traditional relational storage can also use |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
| SQL Azure.) Both Windows Azure applications and on-premises applications can access the Windows |
| Azure storage service, and both do it in the same way: using a RESTful approach. |
|
|
| Fabric controller: As the figure suggests, Windows Azure runs on a large number of machines. The |
| fabric controller’s job is to knit the machines in a single Windows Azure data center into a cohesive |
| whole. The Windows Azure compute and storage services are then built on top of this pool of |
| processing power. |
|
|
| Content delivery network (CDN): Caching frequently accessed data closer to its users speeds up |
| access to that data. The Windows Azure CDN can do this for blobs, maintaining cached copies at sites |
| around the world. |
|
|
| Connect: It’s often useful for organizations to interact with cloud applications as if they were inside |
| the organization’s own firewall. Windows Azure Connect allows this, making it easier for, say, a |
| Windows Azure application to access an on-premises database. |
|
|
| Running applications and storing data in the cloud can have clear benefits. Rather than buying, installing, |
| and operating its own systems, for example, an organization can rely on a cloud provider to do this for |
| them. Also, customers pay just for the computing and storage they use, rather than maintaining a large |
| set of servers only for peak loads. And applications written for Windows Azure can scale better, be more |
| reliable, and require less administration than those written using the traditional Windows Server |
| programming model. |
|
|
| To create, configure, and monitor applications, Windows Azure customers can use a browser-accessible |
| portal. A customer logs in with a Windows Live ID, then chooses whether to create a hosting account for |
| running applications, a storage account for storing data, or both. Microsoft then charges each customer |
| based on how much compute time, storage, and bandwidth that customer uses. How an application |
| charges its own customers—if it charges them at all—is entirely up to the people who create that |
| application. |
|
|
| Windows Azure is a general platform that can be used in a broad set of scenarios. Here are a few |
| examples: |
|
|
| An independent software vendor (ISV) creating a software-as-a-service (SaaS) version of an existing |
| on-premises Windows application might choose to build it on Windows Azure. Because Windows |
| Azure mostly provides a standard Windows environment, moving the application’s business logic to |
| this cloud platform won’t typically pose many problems. And once again, building on an existing |
| platform lets the ISV focus on business logic—the thing that makes them money—rather than |
| spending time on infrastructure. |
|
|
| An enterprise creating an application for its customers or employees might choose to build it on |
| Windows Azure. Because Windows Azure supports .NET, developers with the right skills aren’t |
| difficult to find, nor are they prohibitively expensive. Running the application in Microsoft data |
| centers frees the enterprise from the responsibility and expense of managing its own servers, turning |
| capital expenses into operating expenses. And especially if the application has spikes in usage— |
| maybe it’s an on-line flower store that must handle the Mother’s Day rush—letting Microsoft |
| maintain the large server base required for this can make economic sense. |
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
| A start-up creating a new Web site—the next Facebook, say—could build its application on Windows |
| Azure. Because this platform supports both Web-facing services and background processes, the |
| application can provide an |
| interface as well as executing work for users |
| asynchronously. Rather than spending time and money worrying about infrastructure, the start-up |
| can instead focus solely on creating code that provides value to its customers and investors. The |
| company can also start small, incurring low costs while its application has only a few users. If the |
| application catches on and usage increases, Windows Azure can scale the application as needed. |
|
|
| interactive user |
|
|
| These three examples illustrate the kinds of things organizations might do with Windows Azure, but |
| they’re not an exhaustive list. As interest in cloud computing continues to grow, expect to see a variety of |
| applications created for this cloud platform. |
|
|
| SQL AZURE |
|
|
| Along with running applications, another attractive way to use the cloud is for storing data. SQL Azure |
| addresses this area, offering cloud-based services for relational data. As Figure 3 shows, SQL Azure today |
| includes three components. |
|
|
| Figure 3: SQL Azure provides relational database services in the cloud. |
|
|
| The components of SQL Azure today are the following: |
|
|
| SQL Azure Database provides a cloud-based database management system (DBMS). This technology |
| lets on-premises and cloud applications store relational data on Microsoft servers in Microsoft data |
|
|
| 6 |
|
|
| centers. As with other cloud technologies, an organization pays only for what it uses, increasing and |
| decreasing usage (and cost) as the organization’s needs change. Using a cloud database also allows |
| converting what would be capital expenses, such as investments in disks and DBMS software, into |
| operating expenses. |
|
|
| SQL Azure Reporting is a version of SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) that runs in the cloud. |
| Intended primarily for use with SQL Azure Database, it allows creating and publishing standard SSRS |
| reports on cloud data. |
|
|
| SQL Azure Data Sync allows synchronizing data between SQL Azure Database and on-premises SQL |
| Server databases. It can also be used to synchronize data across different SQL Azure databases in |
| different Microsoft data centers. |
|
|
| SQL Azure is built on Microsoft SQL Server. As with SQL Server, developers can create indexes and views, |
| use stored procedures, define triggers, and more. Applications can access SQL Azure data using Entity |
| Framework, ADO.NET, and other Windows data access interfaces. In fact, applications that today access |
| SQL Server locally will largely work unchanged with data in SQL Azure. Customers can also use on- |
| premises software such as SQL Server Analysis Services to work with their cloud-based data. |
|
|
| While applications can use SQL Azure much as they do a local DBMS, the management requirements are |
| significantly reduced. Rather than worry about mechanics, such as monitoring disk usage and servicing log |
| files, a SQL Azure customer can focus on their data; Microsoft handles the operational details. And as with |
| other components of this cloud platform, customers use the common Windows Azure platform portal to |
| access its services. |
|
|
| Applications might use SQL Azure in a variety of ways. Here are some examples: |
|
|
| A Windows Azure application can store its data in SQL Azure. While Windows Azure provides its own |
| storage, relational tables aren’t among the options it offers. Since many existing applications use |
| relational storage and many developers know how to work with it, a significant number of Windows |
| Azure applications rely on SQL Azure to work with data in this familiar way. For example, a SaaS |
| application built on Windows Azure might create a separate SQL Azure database for each customer, |
| providing an intrinsically multi-tenant design. And to improve performance, customers can specify |
| that a particular Windows Azure application must run in the same data center in which SQL Azure |
| Database stores that application’s information. |
|
|
| An application in a small business or a department of a larger organization might rely on SQL Azure. |
| Rather than storing its data in a SQL Server or Access database running on a computer under |
| somebody’s desk, the application can instead take advantage of the reliability and availability of cloud |
| storage. It can also create reports on this data using either SQL Azure Reporting or SSRS on-premises. |
| If the organization wishes to maintain an on-premises copy of the data as well, it can use SQL Azure |
| Data Sync to synchronize the cloud and on-premises databases. |
|
|
| Suppose a manufacturer wishes to make product information available both to its dealer network |
| and directly to customers. Putting this data in SQL Azure would let it be accessed by applications |
| running at the dealers and by a customer-facing Web application run by the manufacturer itself. |
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
| Whether it’s for supporting a Windows Azure application, making data more accessible, or other reasons, |
| data services in the cloud can be attractive. The goal of SQL Azure is to provide these services in a familiar, |
| usable way for cloud and on-premises applications. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE APPFABRIC |
|
|
| Running applications and storing data in the cloud are both important aspects of cloud computing. |
| They’re far from the whole story, however. It’s also possible to provide cloud-based infrastructure |
| services. Filling this gap is the goal of Windows Azure AppFabric. |
|
|
| The functions provided by AppFabric today address common challenges in building distributed |
| applications. Figure 4 shows its components. |
|
|
| Figure 4: Windows Azure AppFabric provides Windows Azure-based infrastructure services that can be |
| used by both cloud and on-premises applications. |
|
|
| As the figure suggests, all of the components of Windows Azure AppFabric are built on Windows Azure |
| (although they don’t all provide services solely to Windows Azure applications). Those components are |
| the following: |
|
|
| Service Bus: Exposing an application’s services on the Internet is harder than it might seem. The goal |
| of Service Bus is to make this simpler by letting an application expose endpoints in the cloud that can |
| be accessed by other applications, whether on-premises or in the cloud. Each exposed endpoint is |
| assigned a URI, which clients can use to locate and access the service. Service Bus also handles the |
| challenges of dealing with network address translation and getting through firewalls without opening |
| new ports for exposed applications. |
|
|
| Access Control: There are many ways for a user to get a digital identity today. The options include |
| Active Directory, Windows Live ID, Google Accounts, Facebook, and more. If an application wants to |
| let users log in with any of these, the application’s creator faces the daunting challenge of supporting |
|
|
| 8 |
|
|
| this plethora of approaches. Access Control simplifies this by providing built-in support for all of them |
| (and more). It also provides a single place for defining rules to control what each user is allowed to |
| access. |
|
|
| Caching: It’s common for applications to access the same data over and over. One way to speed up |
| this kind of application is to cache frequently accessed information, reducing the number of times |
| that application must query a database. The Caching service provides this—and the performance |
| boost it brings—for Windows Azure applications. |
|
|
| Microsoft has announced plans to add more services under the Windows Azure AppFabric banner, so |
| expect this list to grow in the not-too-distant future. |
|
|
| As with Windows Azure and SQL Azure, customers use a browser-accessible portal to sign up for |
| AppFabric. Once this has been done, these services can be used in a variety of ways. Here are some of the |
| possibilities: |
|
|
| Suppose an enterprise wished to let software at its trading partners access one of its applications. It |
| could expose this application’s functions through SOAP or RESTful services created using WCF, then |
| register those service endpoints with Service Bus. Its trading partners could then use Service Bus to |
| find these endpoints and access the services. |
|
|
| Imagine that the creator of this same application needs to let trading partners log in with a variety of |
| different identities. Rather than implementing support for these identities himself, he could use the |
| Access Control service to hide this complexity. |
|
|
| A Windows Azure application created using ASP.NET might use the Session object to store per-client |
| state. By changing only a configuration setting, the application can cause this data to be kept in the |
| Caching service rather than, say, Windows Azure Storage tables. Doing this is likely to make the |
| application faster and more scalable. |
|
|
| Along with the cloud-based services of Windows Azure AppFabric, Microsoft also provides an analogous |
| technology known as Windows Server AppFabric. As its name suggests, the services it provides run on |
| Windows Server—they support on-premises applications—rather than in the cloud. The on-premises |
| services aren’t exactly the same today as those in Windows Azure AppFabric (although Microsoft’s |
| announced plan is make the two congruent). Don’t be confused; throughout this paper, the name |
| “AppFabric” is used to refer to the cloud-based services. Also, don’t confuse Windows Azure AppFabric |
| with the Windows Azure fabric controller. Even though both contain the term “fabric”, they’re wholly |
| separate technologies addressing quite distinct problems. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE MARKETPLACE |
|
|
| In the on-premises world, many applications are purchased rather than custom-built. Many organizations |
| also rely on datasets from commercial providers. With the rise of the cloud, why not let customers find |
| and buy cloud applications and cloud-accessible data? Making this possible is the goal of Windows Azure |
| Marketplace. Figure 5 shows its two components. |
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
| Figure 5: Windows Azure Marketplace provides an online marketplace for cloud applications and data. |
|
|
| The two parts of Windows Azure Marketplace are: |
|
|
| DataMarket (originally codenamed “Dallas”), providing a way for content providers to make datasets |
| available. Customers can browse the offerings, then purchase whatever they find useful. Applications, |
| both custom and off-the-shelf (such as Microsoft Excel), can then access this data through RESTful |
| requests or the OData protocol. |
|
|
| AppMarket, providing a way for creators of cloud applications to expose those applications to |
|
|
| potential customers. AppMarket will be available sometime after DataMarket. |
|
|
| Using the cloud to find, evaluate, and purchase data and applications makes sense. The goal of Windows |
| Azure Marketplace is to make these things easier to do. |
|
|
| A CLOSER LOOK AT THE TECHNOLOGIES |
|
|
| Having a broad understanding of the Windows Azure platform is an important first step. Making good |
| decisions require a deeper understanding of these technologies, however. This section takes a slightly |
| more in-depth look at each member of the family. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE |
|
|
| Windows Azure provides what’s commonly called Platform as a Service (PaaS). Rather than offering a |
| cloud replica of the on-premises world, it offers a higher level of service that’s meant to make life easier |
| for both developers and administrators. What follows walks through the five components that |
| collectively provide this service. |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
| Compute |
|
|
| An application built on the Windows Azure compute service is structured as one or more roles. When it |
| executes, the application typically runs two or more instances of each role, with each instance running as |
| its own virtual machine (VM). Figure 6 shows how this looks. |
|
|
| Figure 6: A running Windows Azure application consists of any combination of Web role instances, |
| Worker role instances, and VM role instances. |
|
|
| A Windows Azure application today can be created using three kinds of roles: |
|
|
| Web roles, intended primarily for running Web-based applications. Each Web role instance has |
| Internet Information Services (IIS) 7 pre-configured to run inside it, so creating applications using |
| ASP.NET, WCF, or other Web technologies is straightforward. It’s also possible to create applications |
| using PHP, Java, and other non-Microsoft technologies. |
|
|
| Worker roles, designed to run a variety of code. A Worker role might run a simulation, for example, |
| or video processing or nearly anything else. It’s common for an application to interact with users |
| through a Web role, then hand tasks off to a Worker role for processing. |
|
|
| VM roles, which can run a user-provided Windows Server 2008 R2 image. A VM role can be the right |
|
|
| choice for moving some on-premises Windows Server applications to Windows Azure. |
|
|
| When a developer gives Windows Azure an application to run, she submits configuration information |
| along with it. Among other things, this information tells the platform how many instances of each role to |
| run. The Windows Azure fabric controller then creates a VM for each instance, running the code for the |
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
| appropriate role in each VM. And as Figure 6 indicates, requests from the outside world are load balanced |
| across all instances of a role. |
|
|
| This has an important implication: To be scalable, Windows Azure role instances shouldn’t maintain their |
| state themselves between requests. Because the load balancer doesn’t allow creating an affinity with a |
| particular role instance—there’s no support for sticky sessions—there’s no way to guarantee that multiple |
| requests from the same user will be sent to the same instance. Instead, any client-specific state should be |
| written to Windows Azure storage, stored in SQL Azure Database, or maintained externally in some other |
| way. |
|
|
| For role instances, Windows Azure lets developers choose from several VM sizes, each with a specific |
| number of processor cores and memory. Since each instance can be assigned one or more cores, |
| applications have predictable performance. And to increase the load an application can handle, its owner |
| or the application itself can request an increase in the number of running instances for one or more roles. |
| The Windows Azure fabric controller will then spin up new VMs for these instances and start them |
| running. It’s also possible to explicitly decrease the number of instances for a role, letting an application |
| grow and shrink as needed to handle changing loads. |
|
|
| For developers, building a Windows Azure application looks much like building a traditional Windows |
| application. Microsoft provides Visual Studio project templates, for instance, to help developers create |
| Windows Azure applications. Also, the Windows Azure software development kit includes a version of the |
| Windows Azure environment that runs on the developer’s machine. Known as the Windows Azure |
| development fabric, it implements a local replica of the Windows Azure compute and storage services. A |
| developer can create and debug his application using this local simulacrum, then deploy it to Windows |
| Azure in the cloud when it’s ready. Windows Azure also provides other services for developers, such as |
| information about a running application’s CPU consumption, incoming and outgoing bandwidth, and |
| storage usage. |
|
|
| Storage |
|
|
| Applications work with data in many different ways. Sometimes, all that’s required are simple blobs, while |
| other situations call for a more structured way to store information. And in some cases, all that’s really |
| needed is a way to exchange data between different parts of an application. Windows Azure storage |
| addresses all three of these requirements, as Figure 7 shows. |
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
| Figure 7: Windows Azure provides blobs, tables, and queues, all accessed in a RESTful style via HTTP, |
| HTTPS, or OData. |
|
|
| The simplest way to store data in Windows Azure storage is to use blobs. As Figure 7 suggests, there’s a |
| simple hierarchy: A storage account can have one or more containers, each of which holds one or more |
| blobs. Blobs can be big—as large as a terabyte each—and to make transferring large blobs more efficient, |
| they can potentially be subdivided into blocks. If a failure occurs, retransmission can resume with the |
| most recent block rather than sending the entire blob again. Blobs can also have associated metadata, |
| such as information about where a JPEG photograph was taken or who the composer is for an MP3 file. |
|
|
| Another way to use blobs is through Windows Azure drives, which can be mounted by a role instance. The |
| underlying storage for a drive is a blob, and so once a drive is mounted, the instance can read and write |
| file system data that gets stored persistently in a blob. |
|
|
| Blobs are just right for some kinds of data, but they’re too unstructured for many situations. To allow |
| applications to work with data in a more fine-grained way, Windows Azure storage provides tables. Don’t |
| be misled by the name: These aren’t relational tables. In fact, even though they’re called “tables”, the |
| data they contain is actually stored in a set of entities with properties. A table has no defined schema; |
| instead, properties can have various types, such as int, string, Bool, or DateTime. And rather than using |
| SQL, an application can access a table’s data using the simple query language defined by OData. A single |
| table can be quite large, with billions of entities holding terabytes of data, and Windows Azure storage |
| can partition it across many servers if necessary to improve performance. |
|
|
| Blobs and tables are both focused on storing data. The third option in Windows Azure storage, queues, |
| has a somewhat different purpose. A primary use of queues is to let Web role instances communicate |
| with Worker role instances. For example, a user might submit a request to perform some compute- |
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
| intensive task via a Web page implemented by a Windows Azure Web role. The Web role instance that |
| receives this request can write a message into a queue describing the work to be done. A Worker role |
| instance that’s waiting on this queue can then read the message and carry out the task it specifies. Any |
| results can be returned via another queue or handled in some other way. |
|
|
| Regardless of how it’s stored—in blobs, tables, or queues—all data held in Windows Azure storage is |
| replicated three times. This replication allows fault tolerance, since losing a copy isn’t fatal. The system |
| guarantees consistency, however, so an application that reads data it has just written will get what it |
| expects. |
|
|
| Windows Azure storage can be accessed either by a Windows Azure application or by an application |
| running somewhere else. In both cases, all three Windows Azure storage styles use the conventions of |
| REST (and the OData protocol for tables) to identify and expose data. Everything is named using URIs and |
| accessed with standard HTTP operations, so clients can be created using .NET, Java, or other familiar |
| technologies. |
|
|
| The Windows Azure platform charges independently for compute and storage resources. This means that |
| an on-premises application can use just Windows Azure storage, accessing its data in the RESTful way just |
| described. For example, a Windows Server application running in an enterprise data center might choose |
| to store backups in Windows storage blobs. |
|
|
| Fabric Controller |
|
|
| Even though a Windows Azure application runs in VMs, a developer doesn’t explicitly create and manage |
| those VMs. Instead, as described earlier, she just tells the platform how many instances the application |
| needs, and Windows Azure silently creates the necessary VMs and runs her application. This magic is |
| performed by the fabric controller, a fundamental aspect of Windows Azure. |
|
|
| Along with creating VMs and starting the applications that run in them, the fabric controller also monitors |
| all running instances. A role instance might fail for many reasons; maybe the code threw an exception or |
| the VM crashed or the physical server it’s running on went down. Whatever the reason, the fabric |
| controller will start a new instance to maintain the total number of instances required for this application. |
|
|
| The fabric controller also handles housekeeping tasks like patching the operating system and other |
| system software, which minimizes the need for administrators. These are all examples of why Windows |
| Azure is viewed as PaaS: It provides a platform that lets customers run applications without worrying |
| about administering the environment they run in. |
|
|
| Content Delivery Network |
|
|
| One common use of blobs is to store information that will be accessed from many different places. Think |
| of an application that serves up videos, for example, to Flash, Silverlight, or HTML 5 clients around the |
| world. To improve performance in situations like this, Windows Azure provides a content delivery |
| network. The CDN stores copies of a blob at sites closer to the clients that use it. This speeds up delivery |
| of frequently accessed content, improving performance for users of this information. |
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
| Connect |
|
|
| Windows Azure applications can interact with the outside world via HTTP, HTTPS, or TCP. But suppose |
| you’d like to connect a role in an application to a machine outside the cloud at the IP level. For example, |
| suppose an organization decides to move an existing ASP.NET application to Windows Azure, but wishes |
| to keep the application’s data in an on-premises SQL Server database. Windows Azure Connect allows |
| this. |
|
|
| Using this option requires running Windows Azure Connect software on the on-premises machine that |
| contains SQL Server, and it also requires some straightforward configuration. (This configuration can be |
| done by the developer—there’s no need to get a network administrator involved.) Once this is done, all of |
| the instances in the Web role can behave as if they’re on the same IP network as the SQL Server machine. |
| In fact, they can use the same SQL Server connection string as when the application was running on |
| premises—there’s no difference. |
|
|
| Note that this isn’t a full-fledged virtual private network (VPN). While Microsoft has announced plans to |
| let customers connect to Windows Azure via a VPN, this isn’t currently supported. It is possible to use |
| Windows Azure Connect to domain-join a Windows Azure application to an on-premises Active Directory, |
| however. Doing this allows single sign-on by on-premises users to the cloud application, and it also lets |
| the application use existing Active Directory accounts and groups for access control. |
|
|
| The goal of application platforms, whether on-premises or in the cloud, is to support applications and |
| data. Windows Azure provides a home for both of these things. Going forward, expect to see a substantial |
| share of what would have been on-premises Windows applications instead running on this new cloud |
| platform. |
|
|
| SQL AZURE |
|
|
| A DBMS in the cloud is attractive for many reasons. Letting a specialized service provider ensure reliability |
| and perform essential management functions can make sense, especially for organizations that find these |
| things hard to do on their own. Data in the cloud can also be accessed by applications running anywhere, |
| even on mobile devices. And given the economies of scale that a service provider enjoys, using a cloud |
| database may well be cheaper than doing it yourself. |
|
|
| SQL Azure provides these things, together with cloud-based reporting and data synchronization services. |
| And while all of them are important, the place to start is with the foundation: SQL Azure Database. |
|
|
| Database |
|
|
| SQL Azure Database is simple to understand. As seen by an application, it provides the core database |
| functions of SQL Server as a cloud service. Figure 8 shows the basics of this technology. |
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
| Figure 8: Applications access data in SQL Azure Database through Microsoft’s TDS protocol or via OData. |
|
|
| An application using SQL Azure Database might run on Windows Azure, in an enterprise’s data center, on |
| a mobile device, or somewhere else. Wherever it runs, the application typically accesses data via a |
| protocol called Tabular Data Stream (TDS). This is the same protocol used to access a local SQL Server |
| database, and so a SQL Azure Database application can use any existing SQL Server client. This includes |
| Entity Framework, ADO.NET, ODBC, PHP and others. And because SQL Azure Database looks like an |
| ordinary SQL Server system, standard tools can also be used, including SQL Server Management Studio, |
| SQL Server Integration Services, and BCP for bulk data copy. Also, as Figure 8 shows, applications can |
| optionally access SQL Azure Database using OData. |
|
|
| Each SQL Azure account can have one or more logical servers. (Note that these provide a way to organize |
| the data and billing for an account—they aren’t actual instances of SQL Server.) Each server can then have |
| multiple databases, each of which can be up to 50 gigabytes in size. A user is free to use multiple |
| databases if required, spreading data across them for better performance or for other reasons. It’s also |
| possible to store a snapshot of one SQL Azure database into another, providing a simple backup |
| mechanism. |
|
|
| For the most part, an application using SQL Azure Database sees a familiar SQL Server environment. A few |
| things are omitted in the technology’s current release, however, such as the SQL Common Language |
| Runtime (CLR) and support for full-text search. (Microsoft says that both will be available in a future |
| version.) Also, because administration is handled by Microsoft, the service doesn’t expose physical |
| administrative functions. A customer can’t shut down the system, for example, or interact directly with |
| the hardware it runs on. And as you’d expect in a shared environment, a query can run for only a limited |
| time—no single request can take up more than a pre-defined amount of resources. |
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
| Yet while the environment looks quite standard, the service an application gets is more robust than what |
| a single instance of SQL Server provides. As in Windows Azure storage, all data stored in SQL Azure |
| Database is replicated three times for high availability. Also like Windows Azure storage, the service |
| provides strong consistency: When a write returns, the data has been made persistent. The goal is to |
| provide reliable data storage even in the face of system and network failures. |
|
|
| Whether an application needs multiple databases or just one, SQL Azure Database can help developers |
| address a range of scenarios. Whatever problem is being solved, the technology’s fundamental goal |
| remains the same: to provide a familiar, reliable, and low-cost cloud database for many kinds of |
| applications. |
|
|
| Reporting |
|
|
| Storing data in SQL Azure Database can be useful. But as soon as that data exists, there’s likely to be a |
| demand for reports based on that data. Meeting this demand is the purpose of SQL Azure Reporting. |
| Based on SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS), this technology provides a cloud-based way to create |
| reports. |
|
|
| Given that SQL Azure Database looks like SQL Server to an application, it’s always possible to use SSRS on- |
| premises with the data it contains. So why bother to provide a cloud reporting service as well? SQL Azure |
| Reporting today targets two main scenarios: |
|
|
| Reports created using SQL Azure Reporting can be published to a SQL Azure Reporting portal, letting |
|
|
| users access it there, or made accessible directly via a URL. |
|
|
| An ISV can embed reports published to the SQL Azure Reporting portal in any application, including |
| Windows Azure applications. This lets users access those reports without leaving the application. To |
| do this, the ISV can use the standard ReportViewer controls in Visual Studio—it’s no different from |
| embedding on-premises reports into applications. |
|
|
| SQL Azure Reporting is designed to work with data stored in SQL Azure Database. Reports used with SQL |
| Azure Reporting are created on-premises, however, with Business Intelligence Developer Studio, the |
| Visual Studio-hosted tool that’s also used to create SSRS reports. In fact, SQL Azure Reporting relies on the |
| same reporting format, expressed in the Report Definition Language (RDL), used with SSRS. |
|
|
| Like other aspects of SQL Azure, SQL Azure Reporting doesn’t provide all of the functions offered by SSRS |
| on premises. There’s currently no support for scheduling and subscriptions, for example, that let a report |
| be run and delivered at regular intervals. Still, cloud-based reporting services can be useful, and they’re an |
| important part of the SQL Azure technology family. |
|
|
| Data Sync |
|
|
| Storing data in SQL Azure Database can make it accessible to any application with an Internet connection. |
| Still, there are often situations where it makes sense to maintain a copy of this cloud-based data in some |
| other place. Suppose an organization needs to have an on-premises copy of the same information, for |
| example, for performance reasons or to ensure access if the network fails. For scenarios like this, the |
| ability to synchronize data in SQL Azure Database with other data stores is useful. |
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
| It’s always possible to write synchronization code yourself using the Microsoft Sync Framework. To make |
| this easier, Microsoft provides SQL Azure Data Sync. Rather than requiring its user to write code, this |
| technology is entirely configuration-driven (although unsurprisingly, it’s built on the Microsoft Sync |
| Framework). As Figure 9 shows, SQL Azure Data Sync supports two options today. |
|
|
| Figure 9: SQL Azure Data Sync can synchronize data between SQL Azure databases or between a SQL |
| Azure database and on-premises SQL Server databases. |
|
|
| The two synchronization options are the following: |
|
|
| Synchronizing data between a SQL Azure database and an on-premises SQL Server database. Having |
| an on-premises copy of cloud data might make sense for a variety of reasons. Maybe an organization |
| wants to make sure that this data is always available, for instance, even in the event of network |
| failures, or perhaps regulations require that a copy of the data always be available within a country’s |
| borders. And even though SQL Azure’s built-in data replication guards against hardware failures, the |
| data’s owner might choose to maintain an on-premises backup copy in case of administrative errors, |
| such as incorrect table deletions. |
|
|
| Synchronizing data between SQL Azure databases in different Microsoft data centers. For example, |
| suppose an ISV or a global enterprise creates an application that’s used by people around the world. |
| To provide good performance for all of them, its creator might choose to run this application in three |
| different Windows Azure data centers: one each in North America, Europe, and Asia. If the |
| application stores data in SQL Azure Database, it might rely on SQL Azure Data Sync to keep |
| information synchronized across these three data centers. |
|
|
| SQL Azure Data Sync uses a hub-and-spoke model. All changes are copied first to the SQL Azure database |
| hub, then out to the spokes (referred to as members). The members might be other SQL Azure databases |
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
| or on-premises SQL Server databases. In both cases, the technology provides synchronization of an entire |
| database or just specific tables, with changes made to any copy propagated to all of the others. And while |
| it’s possible to initiate synchronization manually, SQL Azure Data Sync also includes a scheduling service. |
| This lets users schedule, say, hourly synchronization between a pair of databases. However it’s used, the |
| purpose is the same: providing a straightforward way to synchronize data between a SQL Azure database |
| in a Microsoft data center and one or more databases located somewhere else. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE APPFABRIC |
|
|
| Applications exist because their business logic has value. Yet applications rely on infrastructure to provide |
| a foundation for that logic. A good application platform provides this infrastructure; application |
| developers shouldn’t need to write it themselves. |
|
|
| Windows Azure AppFabric provides infrastructure for applications. The people who create applications |
| can benefit from different kinds of infrastructure, and so AppFabric contains various parts. This section |
| takes a closer look at Service Bus, Access Control, and Caching, the three components of Windows Azure |
| AppFabric today. |
|
|
| Service Bus |
|
|
| Suppose you have an application running inside your organization that exposes a Web service built with |
| Windows Communication Foundation (WCF). Suppose further that you’d like to connect this service |
| through the Internet to software running outside your organization. This client software might be running |
| on a cloud platform, such as Windows Azure, or inside another organization. |
|
|
| At first glance, this can seem like a simple problem. Since your application provides its functionality |
| through Web services (either RESTful or SOAP-based), you can just make those Web services visible to the |
| outside world. When you actually try to do this, though, some problems appear. |
|
|
| First, how can clients in other organizations find endpoints they can connect to for your service? It would |
| be nice to have some kind of registry where others could locate your application. And once they’ve found |
| it, how can requests from software in other organizations get through to your service? Network address |
| translation (NAT) is very common, so an application frequently doesn’t have a fixed IP address to expose |
| externally. And even if NAT isn’t being used, how can requests get through your firewall? It’s possible to |
| open firewall ports to allow access to your application, but network administrators frown on this. |
|
|
| Service Bus addresses these challenges. Figure 10 shows how. |
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
| Figure 10: A WCF service can register endpoints with Service Bus, then have clients discover and use |
| those endpoints to access the service. |
|
|
| To begin, your WCF service registers one or more endpoints with Service Bus (step 1). For each registered |
| endpoint, Service Bus exposes its own corresponding endpoint (step 2). Service Bus assigns your |
| organization a URI root, below which you’re free to create any naming hierarchy you like. This allows your |
| endpoints to be assigned specific, discoverable URIs. |
|
|
| When a client running in the cloud or on-premises at some other organization wishes to access your |
| service, it contacts the Service Bus registry (step 3) to find the endpoint, providing the endpoint’s URI. This |
| request uses the Atom Publishing Protocol, and it returns an AtomPub service document with references |
| to the endpoints Service Bus exposes on behalf of your application. Once it has these, the client can |
| invoke operations on the services exposed through these endpoints (step 4). For each request Service Bus |
| receives, it invokes the corresponding operation in the endpoint exposed by your WCF service (step 5). |
| (Although it’s not shown in the figure, Service Bus establishes a direct connection between an application |
| and its client whenever possible, making their communication more efficient.) |
|
|
| There’s an obvious question here: How exactly does step 5 work? How does the request from Service Bus |
| back to your service deal with the challenges of NAT and firewalls? The answer is that in step 1, your |
| service opened a TCP connection with Service Bus for this exposed endpoint. Service Bus holds this |
| connection open, which solves two problems. First, NAT is no longer an issue, since traffic on the open |
| connection with Service Bus will always be routed to your application. Second, because the connection |
| was initiated from inside the firewall, there’s no problem passing information back to the application via |
| this connection—the firewall won’t block this traffic. |
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
| Along with making communication easier, Service Bus can also improve security. Because clients now see |
| only an IP address provided by Service Bus, there’s no need to expose any IP addresses from within your |
| organization. This effectively makes your application anonymous, since the outside world can’t see it. |
| Service Bus acts as an external DMZ, providing a layer of indirection to deter attackers. |
|
|
| While an application that exposes its services via Service Bus is typically implemented using WCF, clients |
| can be built with WCF or other technologies, such as Java. However they’re created, these clients can |
| make requests via TCP, HTTP, or HTTPS. Applications are also free to use their own security mechanisms, |
| such as encryption, to shield their communication from attackers. |
|
|
| Service Bus provides a few more useful features, including these: |
|
|
| Support for message buffers, which act like simple queues. Rather than require a client to make |
| direct calls to a service, the client can place a message of up to 256 kilobytes into a message buffer. |
| The message is persisted to disk—it’s durable—and the service can then read this message at some |
| later time. And as usual in the Windows Azure platform, the persisted messages are replicated to |
| guard against failures. |
|
|
| The ability for multiple WCF services to listen on the same URI. Service Bus will then randomly spread |
| client requests across all of the listening services. The goal is to provide both load balancing and fault |
| tolerance for the WCF services. |
|
|
| Exposing applications to the outside world isn’t as simple as it might seem. The intent of Service Bus is to |
| make implementing these interactions as straightforward as possible. |
|
|
| Access Control |
|
|
| Working with identity is a fundamental part of most distributed applications. The modern approach to |
| this, called claims-based identity, lets a user send a token full of claims that contain identity information. |
| One claim might contain the user’s name, for example, while another contains her age or a group she |
| belongs to. An application can use the claims in a token to decide what the user is allowed to do or in |
| other ways. |
|
|
| In a claims-based world, tokens are issued by identity providers (IdPs). Some IdPs, such as Active Directory |
| Federation Services (AD FS) 2.0, exist inside organizations. Others, such as Windows Live ID and Google |
| Accounts, are accessible to anyone via the Internet. Each application can decide which IdPs it trusts and |
| thus which tokens it’s willing to accept. For example, an application running inside your company might |
| only accept tokens issued by your own AD FS server, while an application running on the Internet might |
| accept tokens issued by, say, Google and Facebook. |
|
|
| Yet different IdPs use different token formats, and they represent claims in different ways. An application |
| that directly accepts identities from Google, Facebook, and Yahoo, for instance, would need to handle |
| these differences itself. But why do this? Why not instead create an intermediary that can generate a |
| single token format with a common representation of claims? Doing this would make life simpler for the |
| people who create applications, since they now need to handle only one kind of token. |
|
|
| The Access Control service does exactly this, providing an intermediary in the cloud for working with |
| claims-based identity. Figure 11 shows how it works. |
|
|
| 21 |
|
|
| Figure 11: The Access Control service makes it easier for applications to accept identity information |
| issued by different identity providers. |
|
|
| As the figure shows, an application that relies on Access Control can run either on-premises or in the |
| cloud. In either case, the process begins when a user attempts to access this application via a browser |
| (step 1). The application then redirects the browser to an IdP whose token this application will accept. The |
| user authenticates herself with this IdP, such as by entering a username and password, and the IdP |
| returns a token containing claims about her (step 2). |
|
|
| Next, the user’s browser sends the IdP token to Access Control (step 3). Access Control validates the |
| token, making sure that it really was issued by this IdP, then creates a new token according to whatever |
| rules have been defined for this application (step 4). Access Control contains a rules engine, allowing each |
| application’s administrator to define how tokens from various IdPs should be transformed into an Access |
| Control token. For example, if different IdPs use different formats for representing usernames, Access |
| Control rules can transform all of these into a common username string. Access Control then sends this |
| new token back to the browser (step 5), which submits it to the application (step 6). Once it has the |
| Access Control token, the application verifies that it really was issued by Access Control, then uses the |
| claims it contains (step 7). |
|
|
| While this process might seem a little complicated, it actually makes life significantly simpler for the |
| creator of the application. Rather than handle diverse tokens containing various claims, the application |
| can accept identities issued by multiple identity providers while still receiving only a single token with |
| familiar claims. And rather than require each application to be configured to trust various IdPs, these trust |
| relationships are instead maintained by Access Control—an application need only trust it. |
|
|
| 22 |
|
|
| As Figure 11 shows, Access Control has built-in support for several identity providers, including AD FS 2.0, |
| Windows Live ID, Google, Yahoo, and Facebook. It can also work with any IdP that supports OpenID. |
| Browsers and other clients can request Access Control tokens using either OAuth 2 or WS-Trust, and these |
| tokens can have various formats, including SAML 1.1, SAML 2.0, and Simple Web Token (SWT). And to |
| create applications that accept Access Control tokens, Windows developers can use Windows Identity |
| Foundation (WIF). (It’s worth pointing out, however, that nothing about Access Control is tied to |
| Windows—it could just as well be used by a Linux application that accepted only Google and Facebook |
| identities.) |
|
|
| Working with identity is important in nearly every distributed application. The goal of Access Control is to |
| make it easier for developers to create secure applications that accept identities from diverse providers. |
| By putting this service in the cloud, Microsoft has made it available to any application running on any |
| platform. |
|
|
| Caching |
|
|
| For many applications, one of the most effective ways to improve performance is by caching frequently |
| accessed data. Since applications tend to use the same information over and over, making this |
| information more readily accessible can make the application faster. Doing this is the purpose of Windows |
| Azure AppFabric Caching. Figure 12 illustrates the idea. |
|
|
| Figure 12: Windows Azure AppFabric Caching speeds up access to frequently accessed data for |
| Windows Azure applications. |
|
|
| 23 |
|
|
| The Caching service provides a distributed cache for Windows Azure applications, along with a library to |
| access this cache. As Figure 12 suggests, the service includes a local cache that can keep a copy of recently |
| accessed data items in each of an application’s role instances. If a data item the application needs isn’t |
| found in the local cache, the cache library automatically contacts the shared cache provided by the |
| Caching service. As the figure shows, this cache is spread across a number of Windows Azure instances, |
| each holding different cached data. This diversity isn’t visible to applications using the cache, however. An |
| application just requests a data item, then lets the cache find it (if it’s in the cache) and return it from |
| whatever instance contains it. |
|
|
| Recently accessed data isn’t automatically cached, however. Instead, the application explicitly inserts data |
| items in the cache, such as by using the Caching API. It’s also possible to configure an ASP.NET application |
| running on Windows Azure to store Session object data in the Caching service, speeding it up without |
| changing any of its code. |
|
|
| Windows Server AppFabric, the on-premises analog to Windows Azure AppFabric, also provides a Caching |
| service. In fact, the two are very similar. The biggest different is that unlike its on-premises counterpart, |
| Windows Azure AppFabric Caching is a service—there’s no need to configure servers and administer the |
| cache. Instead, all of this is handled automatically by the service itself. And the cloud Caching service is |
| multi-tenant, so each application using it gets its own instance. Because the application must authenticate |
| itself to this instance, data held in the Caching service isn’t accessible to other applications. |
|
|
| Caching can make applications faster and more scalable with little effort from developers, and so using it |
| makes sense. By providing caching as a service, Windows Azure AppFabric Caching makes this easier to |
| do. |
|
|
| WINDOWS AZURE MARKETPLACE |
|
|
| Cloud platforms are useful, but they’re just a means to an end. The real goal is offering applications and |
| data that provide value for people. Since the Windows Azure platform provides a foundation for both, |
| why shouldn’t it also include a way for people to find the applications and data that they need? |
|
|
| The Windows Azure Marketplace is designed to address this need. Its two components, AppMarket and |
| DataMarket, let users find, try, and purchase applications and data, respectively. While both are |
| important, DataMarket will appear first, and so what follows focuses on this aspect of the Marketplace. |
|
|
| Buying applications is common today—nearly every organization does it. Buying data is less common, but |
| it’s no less important. Many firms sell many different kinds of data, including demographic information, |
| financial information, legal information, and much more. Yet using purchased data typically requires |
| figuring out whether the data you need exists, finding a firm that offers it, then determining whether their |
| data meets your needs. |
|
|
| All of this is more difficult than it needs to be. Why not create one place where customers can find all |
| kinds of data from all kinds of content providers? Why not let them examine the data to make sure it |
| meets their needs, then purchase what they need right then and there? The DataMarket component of |
| Windows Azure Marketplace was created to do these things. Figure 13 shows its main components. |
|
|
| 24 |
|
|
| Figure 13: Built on Windows Azure, the DataMarket allows access to content partner datasets stored in |
| Windows Azure, SQL Azure, or externally. |
|
|
| As the figure suggests, both people and applications can access information through DataMarket. Using a |
| Windows Azure-based application called the Service Explorer, a user can see what datasets are available, |
| then purchase what she needs. Once this is done, applications can access that data using RESTful or OData |
| requests. The datasets made available by DataMarket can be stored on the Windows Azure platform itself |
| using Windows Azure Storage or SQL Azure Database. They can also be stored externally, such as in a data |
| center owned by the content provider. There’s no requirement to put everything in the cloud. |
|
|
| For customers, DataMarket provides a single place to find, buy, and access a variety of commercial |
| datasets. For content providers—the owners of those data sets—DataMarket offers a chance to expose |
| their offerings to more customers through Microsoft’s cloud platform. While content providers set prices |
| for their data, DataMarket provides a billing service that frees them from dealing directly with customers. |
| Microsoft will also vet the quality of the content providers, limiting DataMarket initially to just the top five |
| providers in a particular industry. |
|
|
| Applications are free to use purchased data in any way that the content provider’s license allows. Users of |
| Microsoft Excel 2010, for example, can access DataMarket’s information directly using an Excel add-in or |
| use the PowerPivot for Excel support for OData to access information from DataMarket for data analysis. |
| It’s also possible to combine data purchased from DataMarket with your own data, such as for reports |
| created using SQL Server Reporting Services. |
|
|
| 25 |
|
|
| Getting business value from information technology requires the right applications, but it also requires |
| the right data. By making it easier to discover, evaluate, and buy commercially available datasets, |
| DataMarket intends to make it simpler for organizations to find and use the information they need. |
|
|
| LOOKING AHEAD |
|
|
| Microsoft has announced a number of updates that it plans to add to the Windows Azure platform in the |
| near future. They include the following: |
|
|
| The Windows Azure Platform Appliance: Microsoft has announced plans to offer a Windows Azure |
| Platform Appliance, allowing hosters and enterprises to run Windows Azure in their own data |
| centers. Because Windows Azure requires a specific hardware configuration—it’s not just software— |
| this appliance will include servers, networking, and storage, all running Windows Azure. And while it |
| will initially be targeted only at large organizations, Microsoft’s goal is eventually to make the |
| Windows Azure Platform Appliance useful for smaller organizations as well. |
|
|
| CDN dynamic content caching: Today, the Windows Azure CDN works only with blob data. This |
| forthcoming functionality will let the CDN also cache content created dynamically by a Windows |
| Azure application. |
|
|
| VM role snapshotting: In its first release, the Windows Azure VM role doesn’t save any changes made |
| to the OS volume while it’s running. Snapshotting will change this, providing a way to periodically |
| save the state of this volume to persistent storage. |
|
|
| Better Java support: While Windows Azure can run Java applications today, Microsoft plans to make |
| this better. The coming improvements include better Java performance, stronger support for Eclipse- |
| based tools, and a more complete set of Java libraries for Windows Azure. |
|
|
| Support for composite applications: To make it easier to build Windows Azure applications by |
| combining existing components and services, Windows Azure AppFabric will add a composition |
| model. Accompanied by runtime services and a Visual Studio-based designer, this model will let |
| developers work with the various parts of an application as a single logical entity throughout its |
| lifecycle. |
|
|
| All of these changes target the same goal: making the Windows Azure platform useful in a broader range |
| of scenarios. |
|
|
| CONCLUSIONS |
|
|
| The truth is evident: Cloud computing is here. For developers, taking advantage of the cloud means using |
| cloud platforms. With the Windows Azure platform, Microsoft presents a range of options addressing a |
| variety of needs: |
|
|
| Windows Azure provides a computing and storage environment in the cloud. |
|
|
| SQL Azure provides a relational DBMS in the cloud, together with reporting and data synchronization. |
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
| Windows Azure AppFabric offers cloud-based infrastructure supporting both cloud and on-premises |
|
|
| applications. |
|
|
| Windows Azure Marketplace is an online store for finding and purchasing datasets from content |
|
|
| providers, together with a forthcoming store for cloud applications. |
|
|
| These approaches address a variety of requirements, and not every developer will use all of them. Yet |
| whether you work for an ISV, a systems integrator, or an enterprise, some cloud platform services are |
| likely to be useful for applications your organization creates. A new world is unfolding; prepare to be part |
| of it. |
|
|
| ABOUT THE AUTHOR |
|
|
| David Chappell is Principal of Chappell & Associates (www.davidchappell.com) in San Francisco, California. |
| Through his speaking, writing, and consulting, he helps people around the world understand, use, and |
| make better decisions about new technologies. |
|
|
| 27 |
|
|
|
|