premise
stringclasses
832 values
hypothesis
stringclasses
832 values
label
class label
0 classes
idx
int32
0
1.1k
template_name
stringclasses
5 values
template
stringclasses
5 values
rendered_input
stringlengths
99
853
rendered_output
stringclasses
4 values
Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
-1no label
400
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham hoped to win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham did not win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Grisham hoped to win the popular vote.
-1no label
401
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham did not win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham hoped to win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Jacob saw Tex sign the contract.
Tex signed the contract.
-1no label
402
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Jacob saw Tex sign the contract. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tex signed the contract."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Tex signed the contract.
Jacob saw Tex sign the contract.
-1no label
403
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tex signed the contract. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Jacob saw Tex sign the contract."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract.
Tex signed the contract.
-1no label
404
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tex signed the contract."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Tex signed the contract.
Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract.
-1no label
405
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tex signed the contract. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Jacob did not see Tex sign the contract."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Grisham won the popular vote.
-1no label
406
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham tried to win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham won the popular vote.
Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
-1no label
407
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham tried to win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
-1no label
408
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham tried to win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham did not win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Grisham tried to win the popular vote.
-1no label
409
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham did not win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham tried to win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Grisham won the popular vote.
-1no label
410
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham almost won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham won the popular vote.
Grisham almost won the popular vote.
-1no label
411
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham almost won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Grisham won the popular vote.
-1no label
412
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham barely won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham won the popular vote.
Grisham barely won the popular vote.
-1no label
413
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham barely won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham almost won the popular vote.
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
-1no label
414
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham almost won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham did not win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Grisham almost won the popular vote.
-1no label
415
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham did not win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham almost won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham barely won the popular vote.
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
-1no label
416
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham barely won the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham did not win the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Grisham did not win the popular vote.
Grisham barely won the popular vote.
-1no label
417
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Grisham did not win the popular vote. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Grisham barely won the popular vote."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
She has three questions.
She had three questions.
-1no label
418
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
She has three questions. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "She had three questions."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
She had three questions.
She has three questions.
-1no label
419
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
She had three questions. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "She has three questions."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Mary left before John entered.
John entered after Mary left.
-1no label
420
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Mary left before John entered. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "John entered after Mary left."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
John entered after Mary left.
Mary left before John entered.
-1no label
421
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
John entered after Mary left. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Mary left before John entered."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Mary left before John entered.
John entered before Mary left.
-1no label
422
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Mary left before John entered. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "John entered before Mary left."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
John entered before Mary left.
Mary left before John entered.
-1no label
423
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
John entered before Mary left. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Mary left before John entered."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Mary was leaving while John entered.
John entered while Mary was leaving.
-1no label
424
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Mary was leaving while John entered. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "John entered while Mary was leaving."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
John entered while Mary was leaving.
Mary was leaving while John entered.
-1no label
425
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
John entered while Mary was leaving. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Mary was leaving while John entered."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Pedro beats his donkey.
-1no label
426
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Pedro beats his donkey."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Pedro beats his donkey.
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
-1no label
427
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Pedro beats his donkey. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
Pedro doesn't have a donkey.
-1no label
428
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Pedro doesn't have a donkey."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Pedro doesn't have a donkey.
If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it.
-1no label
429
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Pedro doesn't have a donkey. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "If Pedro has a donkey, then he beats it."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics.
Xi's second term ends in 2023.
-1no label
430
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Xi's second term ends in 2023."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Xi's second term ends in 2023.
It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics.
-1no label
431
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Xi's second term ends in 2023. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "It is the clearest evidence yet that Xi plans to rule beyond the end of this second term, in 2023, taking China back to the era of one-man rule just as it steps up its role in global politics."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
-1no label
432
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party fro...
no
Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
-1no label
433
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Deng Xiaoping was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party fro...
no
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
-1no label
434
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before i...
no
Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976.
-1no label
435
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Mao was chairman of the Communist Party from before its accession to power in 1949 until his death in 1976. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The move marks an end to a system put in place by Deng Xiaoping in the 1980s to prevent the rise of another Mao, who was chairman of the Communist Party from before i...
no
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
-1no label
436
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders s...
no
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
-1no label
437
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip...
no
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
-1no label
438
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders s...
no
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders.
-1no label
439
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, his vision for China is singular — and will have an impact well beyond China’s borders. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Though the power grab has earned Xi comparisons to leaders such as Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdog...
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation.
-1no label
440
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
-1no label
441
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead.
-1no label
442
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
-1no label
443
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the man uniquely equipped to lead. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead.
-1no label
444
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead.
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead.
-1no label
445
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the man uniquely equipped to lead. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Party media have since amped up the hagiography, casting Xi as the father of the nation and the man uniquely equipped to lead."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
-1no label
446
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman.
-1no label
447
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The latest incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The latest fatal incident, reported Monday morning, killed a 17-year-old boy and wounded a woman."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
-1no label
448
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured."? yes, no, or...
no
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured.
-1no label
449
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of a blast in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Police also responded around 11:50 a.m. Monday to the report of an explosion in southeast Austin in which a woman was badly injured."? yes, no, or...
no
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
-1no label
450
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable in...
no
The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
-1no label
451
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement represents a slight hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable in...
no
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
-1no label
452
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable ...
no
The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship.
-1no label
453
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement represents a significant change in Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable intelligence-sharing relationship. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement represents a significant hardening of Britain's posture toward Russia, with which it has had a valuable ...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
454
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tu...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
455
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a train home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tu...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
456
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tu...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
457
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to take a plane home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tu...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
458
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesd...
no
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump.
-1no label
459
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to go home by air, and his spokesman said Tuesday that the secretary of state was “unaware of the reason” for his firing and had not spoken directly with Trump. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Tillerson cut his trip short Monday to fly home, and his spokesman said Tuesd...
no
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure.
-1no label
460
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure.
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
-1no label
461
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
People across the globe were not expecting Tillerson's departure. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure.
-1no label
462
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure.
The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe.
-1no label
463
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
People across the globe were prepared for Tillerson's departure. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The announcement of Tillerson’s departure sent shock waves across the globe."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
-1no label
464
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
-1no label
465
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
-1no label
466
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer.
LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer.
-1no label
467
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
LaBeouf knowingly had tried to bum a smoke from a police officer. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "LaBeouf had tried to bum a smoke from two strangers, unaware that one of them was a police officer."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested.
-1no label
468
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested.
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
-1no label
469
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was arrested. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home.
-1no label
470
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home.
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station.
-1no label
471
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was escorted home. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "After being denied, he grew angry and ignored the police officer's warnings to relax, so he was handcuffed and taken to the station."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years.
-1no label
472
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years.
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
-1no label
473
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Marc Sims has been getting his hair cut once a week, for several years. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years.
-1no label
474
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years.
Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years.
-1no label
475
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Marc Sims has been cutting hair once a week, for several years. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Marc Sims has been seeing his barber once a week, for several years."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
-1no label
476
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Be...
no
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents.
-1no label
477
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed water treatment plant in Beit Lahia that is intended to serve 400,000 Gaza residents. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "The event Mr. Hamdallah attended on Tuesday was the opening of a long-delayed wastewater treatment plant in Be...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
British investigators say they have identified a nerve agent as Russian.
-1no label
478
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "British investigators say they have iden...
no
British investigators say they have identified a nerve agent as Russian.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
479
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
British investigators say they have identified a nerve agent as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say ...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Russians have identified a nerve agent used in a suspected chemical attack on British soil.
-1no label
480
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russians have identified a nerve agent u...
no
Russians have identified a nerve agent used in a suspected chemical attack on British soil.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
481
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russians have identified a nerve agent used in a suspected chemical attack on British soil. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British...
no
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for last week’s attack.
-1no label
482
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for la...
no
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for last week’s attack.
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
-1no label
483
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian responsibility for last week’s attack. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in la...
no
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last week’s attack.
-1no label
484
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last wee...
no
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last week’s attack.
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last week’s attack.
-1no label
485
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian ignorance of last week’s attack. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Lavrov insisted that Russian experts should be able to examine the British evidence but again denied Russian involvement in last wee...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
486
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Bri...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
487
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain impos...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to an attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
488
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Bri...
no
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to an attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to a suspected chemical attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian.
-1no label
489
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanctions in response to an attack on British soil and demanded access to samples of a nerve agent that British investigators say they have identified as Russian. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Russia vowed Tuesday to retaliate if Britain imposes sanct...
no
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a CIA black site in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
-1no label
490
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Gina Ha...
no
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a CIA black site in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
-1no label
491
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a CIA black site in Thailand where detainees were tortured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Gina Haspe...
no
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a clandestine CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
-1no label
492
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Gina Ha...
no
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a clandestine CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a secret CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured.
-1no label
493
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Gina Haspel, the veteran CIA undercover officer President Donald Trump picked on Tuesday to head the agency, is supported by many in the U.S. intelligence community but has faced criticism for overseeing a clandestine CIA prison in Thailand where detainees were tortured. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Gi...
no
She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
-1no label
494
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, inclu...
no
She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination.
-1no label
495
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
She could be opposed by every Democrat, and some Republicans may also oppose her, including Senator Rand Paul, who has called a news conference on Wednesday to discuss the nomination. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "She could be opposed by all the Democrats, and some Republicans may also oppose her, inclu...
no
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
-1no label
496
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
-1no label
497
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Twitch has routinely given away free in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
-1no label
498
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past."? yes, no, or maybe?
no
Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past.
-1no label
499
based_on_prem_is_hypothesis
{{premise}} Given the above, is it necessarily true that "{{hypothesis}}"? {{answer_choices[0]}}, {{answer_choices[2]}}, or {{answer_choices[1]}}? ||| {{ answer_choices[label] }}
Twitch has routinely given away games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past. Given the above, is it necessarily true that "Twitch has routinely given away free games and in-game content to Twitch Prime subscribers in the past."? yes, no, or maybe?
no