id stringlengths 14 15 | Titles stringclasses 2
values | text stringlengths 101 1.02k | source stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|
1c1465c12ea2-35 | Sri Ashok Goenka & Anr vs Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors on 15 September, 2009 | Even otherwise this Court does not find that apart from the said Clause 5 of the unregistered agreements for sale there was any material before the court on the basis of which it could have come to the conclusion regarding the plaintiffs being in possession over the suit land. Thus the finding of prima facie case in fa... | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44290554/ |
1c1465c12ea2-36 | Sri Ashok Goenka & Anr vs Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors on 15 September, 2009 | Even otherwise as has been laid down by this Court in the case of Fool Kumari Devi(supra) no title could have been claimed by the plaintiffs on the basis of the mere agreements for sale which only entitle them to approach the court for further relief of specific performance of contract but such agreements for sale did ... | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44290554/ |
1c1465c12ea2-37 | Sri Ashok Goenka & Anr vs Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors on 15 September, 2009 | The reliance placed by learned counsel for the plaintiffs-respondents on the decision of the Supreme Court in Ashwinkumar K.Patel's case (supra) is of no avail as in the said case the suit was between two sets of purchasers; one directly from the owners of the land and other from the alleged power of attorney holder fr... | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44290554/ |
1c1465c12ea2-38 | Sri Ashok Goenka & Anr vs Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors on 15 September, 2009 | So far as the case of Sm. Muktakesi Dawn (supra) is concerned the only issue decided therein is that an injunction restraining the pendente lite transfer can be granted in an appropriate case where relief for specific performance is sought. There can be no dispute with the said proposition. However, in the present matt... | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44290554/ |
1c1465c12ea2-39 | Sri Ashok Goenka & Anr vs Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors on 15 September, 2009 | However, considering the fact that the plaintiffs would be put to serious difficulties and inconvenience if there is any further sale of the properties in dispute the appellants and the respondents nos. 3 to 5 are restrained from making any further sale of the properties in question.
It is pointed out by learned cou... | https://indiankanoon.org/doc/44290554/ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.