Fix dev set layout for Archipelago runner

.gitattributes

@@ -61,6 +61,6 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 # Tabular / text data files
 *.jsonl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
-world/apps_data/quickbooks/qbo_journal_entry_register_2024.xlsx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+world/.apps_data/quickbooks/qbo_journal_entry_register_2024.xlsx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 world/filesystem/qbo_general_ledger_detail_2024.xlsx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 world/filesystem/workpaper_iolta_bank_reconciliation_2024_12_31.xlsx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -44,11 +44,11 @@ dataset_info:
       sequence: string
     - name: rubric
       list:
-        - name: id
+        - name: verifier_id
           dtype: string
         - name: criterion_type
           dtype: string
-        - name: description
+        - name: criteria
           dtype: string
     - name: gold_output
       dtype: string
@@ -96,10 +96,14 @@ This repository is the **public sample dev set**: one world and 10 tasks. The sc
 ```
 data/dev.jsonl          10 task records, one JSON object per line (loads as the `dev` split)
 tasks/                  the same 10 records as formatted per-task JSON, for browsing
+tasks_and_rubrics.json  runner-ready task records and grading criteria
+world_descriptions.json
+                        runner metadata for the published world
 world/                  the world's 90 source files, shared by every task
-  apps_data/quickbooks/   7 accounting-system exports
+  .apps_data/quickbooks/  7 accounting-system exports
   filesystem/            83 workpapers, statements, registers, and invoices
-task_files/             16 task-specific files (used for 8 of the 10 tasks)
+world_files_zipped/     packaged initial world snapshot for evaluation runners
+task_files/             per-task filesystem overlays, keyed by stable task ID
 ```
 
 ```python
@@ -113,15 +117,19 @@ The world and task files sit outside `data/` so they stay browsable in the Hub U
 hf download mercor/apex-accounting --repo-type dataset --local-dir apex-accounting
 ```
 
-Every file a task references is included: each `context_files` entry resolves under `world/` or that task's own `task_files/` directory.
+Every file a task references is included: each `context_files` entry resolves under `world/` or that task's own `task_files/<task_id>/filesystem/` directory.
 
 ## Running the tasks
 To execute and evaluate agents we use the open source Archipelago: **[Archipelago](https://github.com/Mercor-Intelligence/archipelago)**, a minimal port of our internal framework for running and evaluating AI agents against RL environments. It includes the Loop Harness used for the APEX-Accounting leaderboard runs, so these tasks can be run against the same execution loop.
 
 This repository provides the tasks, rubrics, and world data. The environment an agent actually sees is assembled at run time. Be aware:
 
-- **Filesystem layout.** At run time the agent browses a single flat filesystem: the contents of `world/filesystem/` are mounted at the root, together with that task's own files from `task_files/<task>/`. The directory split in this repository is for browsing, not the layout the agent sees.
-- **Tools are not included.** At run time the harness injects the tool layer the agent works through: the accounting-software interface and the other tools it calls. That is not part of this release. What ships in `world/apps_data/quickbooks/` is the underlying accounting-system data as static exports, which the tool layer reads; on the leaderboard the agent queries it through those tools rather than opening the files directly.
+The Archipelago runner reads `tasks_and_rubrics.json` and `world_descriptions.json`, then loads the
+matching initial snapshot from `world_files_zipped/`. The packaged snapshot contains `filesystem/`
+and `.apps_data/` at its root.
+
+- **Filesystem layout.** At run time the agent browses a single flat filesystem: the contents of `world/filesystem/` are mounted at the root, together with that task's own files from `task_files/<task_id>/filesystem/`. The directory split in this repository is for browsing, not the layout the agent sees.
+- **Tools are not included.** At run time the harness injects the tool layer the agent works through: the accounting-software interface and the other tools it calls. That is not part of this release. What ships in `world/.apps_data/quickbooks/` is the underlying accounting-system data as static exports, which the tool layer reads; on the leaderboard the agent queries it through those tools rather than opening the files directly.
 - **Run limits.** Leaderboard runs allow a maximum of **500 steps and 5 million tokens** per task, where a step is one model turn that may include reasoning and one or more tool calls. The harness tells the model at each step how many steps and tokens remain. On reaching either limit the model is instructed to submit a final answer and given one additional turn to do so; failing to submit scores zero.
 - **Grading.** The judge is **DeepSeek-v4-Flash at temperature 0.1**, using a GEPA-optimized grading template that is not released. It grades one criterion at a time, receiving the task prompt, the criterion text, and the model's final output (never the trajectory log), and returns a binary Met / Not Met plus a short explanation.
 
@@ -157,8 +165,8 @@ Each task contains the following elements. Each task is associated with one worl
 | `task_id`       | string        | ✓        | Stable unique identifier                                                                                                                       | ✗                          | ✗                 |
 | `prompt`        | string        | ✓        | Agent instruction; the complete task input                                                                                                     | ✓                          | ✓                 |
 | `world_id`      | string        | ✓        | Environment pointer; mounts the accounting-system instance and shipped filesystem                                                              | ✓ (as the environment)     | ✗                 |
-| `context_files` | array         | ✓        | Input-file manifest for the task; metadata only, and the agent is not given this list. Each name resolves under `world/` or `task_files/<task>/`     | ✗                          | ✗                 |
-| `rubric`        | array         | ✓        | Binary criteria; each carries an `id`, a `criterion_type` (`Reasoning (numerical)` or `Reasoning (qualitative)`), and a `description` stating the acceptable value or range | ✗ | ✓ (criterion text) |
+| `context_files` | array         | ✓        | Input-file manifest for the task; metadata only, and the agent is not given this list. Each name resolves under `world/` or `task_files/<task_id>/filesystem/` | ✗                          | ✗                 |
+| `rubric`        | array         | ✓        | Binary criteria; each carries a `verifier_id`, a `criterion_type` (`Reasoning (numerical)` or `Reasoning (qualitative)`), and a `criteria` string stating the acceptable value or range | ✗ | ✓ (criterion text) |
 | `gold_output`   | string        | ✗        | The expert's reference answer, scoring 100% against the rubric                                                                                  | ✗                          | ✗                 |
 | `metadata`      | object        | ✗        | Category, subcategory, output type, world entity type, the author's estimate of real-world completion hours, and author/reviewer roles          | ✗                          | ✗                 |
 

data/dev.jsonl

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
-oid sha256:e7cb8a46dd1f1bde99621185b0b403d4f543519956cc247a6fd2cd15b2149fd3
-size 42790
+oid sha256:b44d745885cc3c938aee897e6a32631caebc77a12ba9b653b50bca8997a154dc
+size 43324

tasks/world_9_task_04.json

@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_6ab475c82b184f7282b9ad3938aa518b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Proposes the journal entry for Whitfield post-settlement holdback as $29,700 Dr Contingency Fee Revenue (or Account 4200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable value is $29,700)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_6ab475c82b184f7282b9ad3938aa518b",
+      "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for Whitfield post-settlement holdback as $29,700 Dr Contingency Fee Revenue (or Account 4200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable value is $29,700)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_eb52d163a3cc4863a9acd057d88d13ad",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Identifies no more than one journal entry."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_eb52d163a3cc4863a9acd057d88d13ad",
+      "criteria": "Identifies no more than one journal entry.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Proposed JE\nDate: 12/31/2024\nMemo: Whitfield post-settlement administrator holdback - reversal of excess contingency fee\t\t\t\nAccount                                             --     Debit       --    Credit\n4200 Contingency Fee Revenue \t\t  --     $29,700\t  --\n2050 Accrued Expenses                     --\t                  --    $29,700",

tasks/world_9_task_05.json

@@ -15,24 +15,24 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_c57e736c563d46c68750238ebc0a7cb6",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the Stub Period Accrual (Dec 20-31) reconciling variance is $69,814.33 (acceptable range is $69,814.32 to $69,814.34)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_c57e736c563d46c68750238ebc0a7cb6",
+      "criteria": "States that the Stub Period Accrual (Dec 20-31) reconciling variance is $69,814.33 (acceptable range is $69,814.32 to $69,814.34)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_7422fc2cab9a4c768a3f9a95e285dc8b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the PTO Year-End Accrual reconciling variance is $25,043.75 (acceptable range is $25,043.74 to $25,043.76)         "
+      "verifier_id": "ver_7422fc2cab9a4c768a3f9a95e285dc8b",
+      "criteria": "States that the PTO Year-End Accrual reconciling variance is $25,043.75 (acceptable range is $25,043.74 to $25,043.76)         ",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_2555235942ac4a1c86a87cf3fb92d2aa",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that 6000 Salaries - Associates final balance is $933,842.59 (acceptable range is $933,842.58 to $933,842.60)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_2555235942ac4a1c86a87cf3fb92d2aa",
+      "criteria": "States that 6000 Salaries - Associates final balance is $933,842.59 (acceptable range is $933,842.58 to $933,842.60)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_5a68bb4506f44891a47fd9b769238bf4",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that 6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel final balance is $528,191.82 (acceptable range is $528,191.81 to $528,191.83)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_5a68bb4506f44891a47fd9b769238bf4",
+      "criteria": "States that 6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel final balance is $528,191.82 (acceptable range is $528,191.81 to $528,191.83)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "December 2024 Payroll Reconciliation, Gusto to QBO - Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP\n\nReconciliation: December Gusto payroll (runs PR-25 and PR-26) totals $368,078.87 and ties to the QBO payroll postings account by account with no variance. QBO December payroll expense totals $462,936.95. The reconciling variances are the two year-end accruals that have no Gusto counterpart: the December 20-31 stub period accrual of $69,814.33 (AJE-2024-03) and the year-end PTO accrual of $25,043.75 (AJE-2024-04). Gusto plus the two accruals equals QBO exactly, for a total variance of $94,858.08.\n\nInconsistency within the reconciliation work already done: the stub accrual as posted carries 6000 Salaries - Associates at $24,175.83 and 6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel at $17,362.63, while the payroll accrual workpaper's per-employee arithmetic gives $26,373.63 for the five Associates and $15,164.83 for the two Of-Counsel. The controller memo's explanation that $2,197.80 was intentionally reclassified for Hannah Whitfield does not verify against the records: her actual stub accrual is $4,450.55, not $2,197.80, and the PTO accrual carries no matching reclassification. The posted split is a $2,197.80 posting error between 6000 and 6010.\n\nFinal balances after correcting the $2,197.80 posting error:\n6000 Salaries - Associates: $933,842.59\n6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel: $528,191.82",

tasks/world_9_task_06.json

@@ -10,64 +10,64 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_d06f80ee48b04b23a70a9272c6e94acd",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $157,538.48 Dr Salaries - Associates (or Account 6000) (Acceptable value is $157,538.48)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_d06f80ee48b04b23a70a9272c6e94acd",
+      "criteria": "States $157,538.48 Dr Salaries - Associates (or Account 6000) (Acceptable value is $157,538.48)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e7ce16b02c87464f965dbfe6f1f33487",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $7,610.56 Dr Employer Payroll Taxes (or Account 6100) (Acceptable value is $7,610.56)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e7ce16b02c87464f965dbfe6f1f33487",
+      "criteria": "States $7,610.56 Dr Employer Payroll Taxes (or Account 6100) (Acceptable value is $7,610.56)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_0a99d2dab0234fa8a852b378b0ce1df3",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $4,726.16 Cr 2210 401(k) Withholding Payable (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_0a99d2dab0234fa8a852b378b0ce1df3",
+      "criteria": "States $4,726.16 Cr 2210 401(k) Withholding Payable (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_675cdb360e4e495093a206d8c124a57b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $105,999.18 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (Acceptable value is $105,999.18)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_675cdb360e4e495093a206d8c124a57b",
+      "criteria": "States $105,999.18 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (Acceptable value is $105,999.18)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_71ac1360b1c943ea85aa6794b8ef9076",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $57,667.86 Cr Payroll Taxes Payable (or Account 2200) (Acceptable value is $57,667.86)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_71ac1360b1c943ea85aa6794b8ef9076",
+      "criteria": "States $57,667.86 Cr Payroll Taxes Payable (or Account 2200) (Acceptable value is $57,667.86)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_5364ba1004994913a0dadee2b1a6c6c1",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $4,726.16 Dr 6120 401(k) Employer Match (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n\n"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_5364ba1004994913a0dadee2b1a6c6c1",
+      "criteria": "States $4,726.16 Dr 6120 401(k) Employer Match (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n\n",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_fffbe3602fe24e438eb3b12083374155",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $1,482.00 Cr Health Insurance Withholding Payable (or Account 2220) (Acceptable value is $1,482.00)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_fffbe3602fe24e438eb3b12083374155",
+      "criteria": "States $1,482.00 Cr Health Insurance Withholding Payable (or Account 2220) (Acceptable value is $1,482.00)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_da3dd83e6f11409581308b9c110a9967",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $49,500.00 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_da3dd83e6f11409581308b9c110a9967",
+      "criteria": "States $49,500.00 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e672c42404294f34a763d69b346365a6",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States $49,500.00 Cr Operating Checking - First Keystone Bank (or Account 1000) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e672c42404294f34a763d69b346365a6",
+      "criteria": "States $49,500.00 Cr Operating Checking - First Keystone Bank (or Account 1000) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_8c9386d755b44a7cacbcb8fb7f001836",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States total partner payment in the company is $5,383,999.98 (Acceptable value is $5,383,999.98)\n"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8c9386d755b44a7cacbcb8fb7f001836",
+      "criteria": "States total partner payment in the company is $5,383,999.98 (Acceptable value is $5,383,999.98)\n",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_996a700ffd99456485d593f93c4bac5f",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States there is a variance of $1,500.00 for Marcus Holloway (Acceptable value is $1,500.00)\n"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_996a700ffd99456485d593f93c4bac5f",
+      "criteria": "States there is a variance of $1,500.00 for Marcus Holloway (Acceptable value is $1,500.00)\n",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_0ce139ba2b5a407f96788a2dc42bca30",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that all partner guaranteed payments are booked to Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) and that the Q4 profit distributions are booked to equity Partner Draws (or Account 3100), outside guaranteed payments"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_0ce139ba2b5a407f96788a2dc42bca30",
+      "criteria": "States that all partner guaranteed payments are booked to Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) and that the Q4 profit distributions are booked to equity Partner Draws (or Account 3100), outside guaranteed payments",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Debit 6000 Salaries - Associates 157,538.48\nDebit 6100 Employer Payroll Taxes 7,610.56\nDebit 6120 401(k) Employer Match 4,726.16\nCredit 2100 Accrued Payroll 105,999.18\nCredit 2200 Payroll Taxes Payable 57,667.86\nCredit 2210 401(k) Withholding Payable 4,726.16\nCredit 2220 Health Insurance Withholding Payable 1,482.00\nDebit 6200 Partner Guaranteed Payments 49,500.00\nCredit 1000 Operating Checking - First Keystone Bank 49,500.00\n\nGuaranteed payments are prepared from the compensation schedule at Marcus Holloway's approved rate of $49,500.00. The GL recorded $48,000.00 actually paid; the $1,500.00 monthly difference ($18,000.00 for the year) is the variance identified below.\n\nAll monthly guaranteed payments are booked to account 6200; the Q4 profit distributions of $799,999.98 are booked to equity account 3100 (Partner Draws), outside guaranteed payments. Total partner payments in the company are $5,383,999.98.\n\nVariance of $1,500.00 for Marcus Holloway - compensation basis ($49,500.00) vs. compensation ledger ($48,000.00).",

tasks/world_9_task_07.json

@@ -13,29 +13,29 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_36b10ea69d0b49529f0c6e497de10147",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Litigation practice group is $93,116.80 (acceptable range $93,111.80 to $93,121.80)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_36b10ea69d0b49529f0c6e497de10147",
+      "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Litigation practice group is $93,116.80 (acceptable range $93,111.80 to $93,121.80)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_8447e100c6c041be913c659e05c5e8e9",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Corporate-M&A practice group is $72,756.93 (acceptable range $72,751.93 to $72,761.93)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8447e100c6c041be913c659e05c5e8e9",
+      "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Corporate-M&A practice group is $72,756.93 (acceptable range $72,751.93 to $72,761.93)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_319999e8e8ec4a0b93cf02f74223b515",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Real Estate practice group is $41,664.37 (acceptable range $41,659.37 to $41,669.37)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_319999e8e8ec4a0b93cf02f74223b515",
+      "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Real Estate practice group is $41,664.37 (acceptable range $41,659.37 to $41,669.37)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_6130ca866a7845229741adf14f3a2cbd",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the total post-adjustment unbilled WIP is $207,538.10 (acceptable range $207,533.10 to $207,543.10)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_6130ca866a7845229741adf14f3a2cbd",
+      "criteria": "States the total post-adjustment unbilled WIP is $207,538.10 (acceptable range $207,533.10 to $207,543.10)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e6f0ceff3d5847a49227d6e028395f11",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Proposes the journal entry for the year-end WIP adjustment as $39,469.40 Dr Fee Discounts and Write-Downs (or Account 4900), Cr Unbilled WIP (or Account 1200) (Acceptable value is $39,469.40)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e6f0ceff3d5847a49227d6e028395f11",
+      "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for the year-end WIP adjustment as $39,469.40 Dr Fee Discounts and Write-Downs (or Account 4900), Cr Unbilled WIP (or Account 1200) (Acceptable value is $39,469.40)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Unbilled work-in-process by practice group\nPractice group               --     Pre-adjustment WIP        --    Post-adjustment WIP      --   Year-end decrease\nLitigation                       --       $112,699.64                   --          $93,116.80                --    $19,582.84\nCorporate-M&A            --        $88,750.80                    --          $72,756.93                --    $15,993.87\nReal Estate                     --        $45,557.06                    --          $41,664.37                --    $  3,892.69\nTotal                              --       $247,007.50                    --        $207,538.10                --    $39,469.40\n\n\nNet year-end adjustment JE:\nDate:12/31/2024\nMemo: To record year-end realization and approved write-down adjustments to unbilled WIP.\nAccount                                                   --        Debit               --      Credit\n4900 Fee Discounts and Write-Downs    --      $39,469.40         --  \n1200 Unbilled WIP                                   --                                --     $39,469.40",

tasks/world_9_task_13.json

@@ -12,64 +12,64 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_be7a5aa5f10a4be8ad915c1ff9253a76",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the QBO AR balance as $1,729,138.00 (acceptable value is $1,729,138.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_be7a5aa5f10a4be8ad915c1ff9253a76",
+      "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance as $1,729,138.00 (acceptable value is $1,729,138.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b0e387abc0524cf6bb4825d62ac7d965",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Concludes the total balance variance between Clio and QBO is $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b0e387abc0524cf6bb4825d62ac7d965",
+      "criteria": "Concludes the total balance variance between Clio and QBO is $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_3f7f0a6af16e4f558f9f39504517d1be",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Explains the Bayshore (M-2024-0005) $125.00 difference as an aging subledger error rather than a real AR discrepancy."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_3f7f0a6af16e4f558f9f39504517d1be",
+      "criteria": "Explains the Bayshore (M-2024-0005) $125.00 difference as an aging subledger error rather than a real AR discrepancy.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_4269edea06554f9d971af7747b5aea3d",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the QBO AR balance for Bayshore as $23,818.10 (acceptable value is $23,818.10)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4269edea06554f9d971af7747b5aea3d",
+      "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Bayshore as $23,818.10 (acceptable value is $23,818.10).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_3bc58f93bab44d83986218814623c26d",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Determines that the Northbridge (M-2024-0009) draft variance of $8,773.31 identified in the draft reconciliation is incorrect."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_3bc58f93bab44d83986218814623c26d",
+      "criteria": "Determines that the Northbridge (M-2024-0009) draft variance of $8,773.31 identified in the draft reconciliation is incorrect.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_443e8b6268734a14b26ce359387425ee",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the QBO AR balance for Northbridge as $22,010.66 (acceptable value is $22,010.66)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_443e8b6268734a14b26ce359387425ee",
+      "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Northbridge as $22,010.66 (acceptable value is $22,010.66).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b0be0ced66f447bc9bc889e7fda76098",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Identifies Hartwell Construction INV-2024-0226 $897.44 as a write-off misclassified as a write-down in the draft."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b0be0ced66f447bc9bc889e7fda76098",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Hartwell Construction INV-2024-0226 $897.44 as a write-off misclassified as a write-down in the draft.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b292df9f650647f981c922eff9b6e8c5",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the December write-down total as $125,873.38 (acceptable value is $125,873.38)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b292df9f650647f981c922eff9b6e8c5",
+      "criteria": "States the December write-down total as $125,873.38 (acceptable value is $125,873.38).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b0be6df02e344b98b2111dde12de3b80",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the December write-off total as $897.44 (acceptable value is $897.44)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b0be6df02e344b98b2111dde12de3b80",
+      "criteria": "States the December write-off total as $897.44 (acceptable value is $897.44).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_4e5208d8e548419cb69dedc5e578a469",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Determines that the Cascade Foods (M-2024-0020) variance of $7,059.28 identified in the draft reconciliation is an error."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4e5208d8e548419cb69dedc5e578a469",
+      "criteria": "Determines that the Cascade Foods (M-2024-0020) variance of $7,059.28 identified in the draft reconciliation is an error.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_f81dbb0a982141948900a94d58bf9829",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the QBO AR balance for Cascade Foods as $77,588.63 (acceptable value is $77,588.63)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_f81dbb0a982141948900a94d58bf9829",
+      "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Cascade Foods as $77,588.63 (acceptable value is $77,588.63).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_17749213131c468d9dad7ee801dd37fd",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that after correcting the draft errors the reconciliation balances to $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_17749213131c468d9dad7ee801dd37fd",
+      "criteria": "States that after correcting the draft errors the reconciliation balances to $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "AR Reconciliation, Clio to QBO - December 31, 2024\n\nTotal AR comparison: The correct QBO AR balance is $1,729,138.00 per the General Ledger account 1100 ending balance. The Clio outstanding balance per the billing export is also $1,729,138.00, so the total-level variance is $0.00. The AR Aging Summary shows $1,729,013.00, which is $125.00 low due to the Bayshore subledger error noted below.\n\nMatter-level variance evaluation:\nBayshore (M-2024-0005): The $125.00 difference is an aging subledger error, not a real AR discrepancy. Clio and the General Ledger agree. The correct QBO AR for Bayshore is $23,818.10.\nNorthbridge (M-2024-0009): The draft variance of $8,773.31 is incorrect. The IOLTA payment is already reflected in the aging, so deducting it again double counts. The correct QBO AR for Northbridge is $22,010.66.\nCascade Foods (M-2024-0020): The draft variance of $7,059.28 is a draft error. The Clio balance already reflects the INV-2024-0232 write-down, so no processing lag exists. The correct QBO AR for Cascade Foods is $77,588.63.\n\nDecember write-down and write-off totals: The draft's combined $126,770.82 includes one misclassified item. Hartwell Construction INV-2024-0226 $897.44 is a write-off misclassified as a write-down. The correct December write-down total is $125,873.38 and the correct December write-off total is $897.44.\n\nFinal reconciliation result: After correcting the draft errors, Clio at $1,729,138.00 and QBO at $1,729,138.00 reconcile with a variance of $0.00.",

tasks/world_9_task_14.json

@@ -14,124 +14,124 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_4a222a154df44589a29ba6611cdbaeea",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Reports the client cost advance ledger ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4a222a154df44589a29ba6611cdbaeea",
+      "criteria": "Reports the client cost advance ledger ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_cadb3774d955427b982ef336f35dfd2c",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Reports the QBO GL ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_cadb3774d955427b982ef336f35dfd2c",
+      "criteria": "Reports the QBO GL ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b98e77008a494cbaa098ebadb8c1c7d3",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Reports the difference between the client cost advance ledger and QBO Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b98e77008a494cbaa098ebadb8c1c7d3",
+      "criteria": "Reports the difference between the client cost advance ledger and QBO Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_1648481e530a405eb653e6e5172ed67d",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that QBO account 1300 includes an opening debit of $45,000.00 for Whitfield cost advances (acceptable value is $45,000.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_1648481e530a405eb653e6e5172ed67d",
+      "criteria": "States that QBO account 1300 includes an opening debit of $45,000.00 for Whitfield cost advances (acceptable value is $45,000.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_1cd21fbf592047eaac603b25ca71ec3c",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that QBO account 1300 includes a Whitfield settlement cost recovery credit of $45,000.00 posted on JE-OB-000843 for matter M-2024-0018 (acceptable value is $45,000.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_1cd21fbf592047eaac603b25ca71ec3c",
+      "criteria": "States that QBO account 1300 includes a Whitfield settlement cost recovery credit of $45,000.00 posted on JE-OB-000843 for matter M-2024-0018 (acceptable value is $45,000.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e7568a8ebc7641ceb331adec4006e09b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Identifies the Whitfield M-2024-0018 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) AP bill lines as a capitalization issue."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e7568a8ebc7641ceb331adec4006e09b",
+      "criteria": "Identifies the Whitfield M-2024-0018 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) AP bill lines as a capitalization issue.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_560bee44af05427bb62fc06692146627",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the Whitfield M-2024-0018 account 5000 contract attorney matter direct lines total $23,500.00 (acceptable value is $23,500.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_560bee44af05427bb62fc06692146627",
+      "criteria": "States that the Whitfield M-2024-0018 account 5000 contract attorney matter direct lines total $23,500.00 (acceptable value is $23,500.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_2d9f3d9b67394a23949fa9f5db3ebeb5",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that Jennifer Kao Law PLLC accounts for $12,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $12,000.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_2d9f3d9b67394a23949fa9f5db3ebeb5",
+      "criteria": "States that Jennifer Kao Law PLLC accounts for $12,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $12,000.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_d6b29c8bbedb46be8fc9a267c6a2090f",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that Westfield Legal Services LLC accounts for $8,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $8,000.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_d6b29c8bbedb46be8fc9a267c6a2090f",
+      "criteria": "States that Westfield Legal Services LLC accounts for $8,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $8,000.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_4db561562e8f4a3eab1e1e024359d796",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that Marcus Avila, Esq. accounts for $3,500.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $3,500.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4db561562e8f4a3eab1e1e024359d796",
+      "criteria": "States that Marcus Avila, Esq. accounts for $3,500.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $3,500.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_bce32b42dac948cab4dc54534a9dd5f9",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the Whitfield cost recovery addendum supports treating matter direct contract attorney services on the Whitfield contingency matter as reimbursable client costs or client cost advances."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_bce32b42dac948cab4dc54534a9dd5f9",
+      "criteria": "States that the Whitfield cost recovery addendum supports treating matter direct contract attorney services on the Whitfield contingency matter as reimbursable client costs or client cost advances.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_8104117f5c414be794927f40b829a813",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that total QBO account 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct activity is $76,000.00 (acceptable value is $76,000.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8104117f5c414be794927f40b829a813",
+      "criteria": "States that total QBO account 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct activity is $76,000.00 (acceptable value is $76,000.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_c1a95dde831644d7aa3c9653a1d4896a",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that non Whitfield account 5000 matter direct activity totals $52,500.00 (acceptable value is $52,500.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_c1a95dde831644d7aa3c9653a1d4896a",
+      "criteria": "States that non Whitfield account 5000 matter direct activity totals $52,500.00 (acceptable value is $52,500.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b6eb46f2561046579e6ced5cf59abc7a",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not capitalized to account 1300."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b6eb46f2561046579e6ced5cf59abc7a",
+      "criteria": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not capitalized to account 1300.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e97f388f3f774750a48904a3f7a99a28",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not included in the $45,000.00 Whitfield settlement cost reimbursement."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e97f388f3f774750a48904a3f7a99a28",
+      "criteria": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not included in the $45,000.00 Whitfield settlement cost reimbursement.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_8896570317bb41c081e7688eea540ae5",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the Whitfield account 5000 treatment is inaccurate or requires correction because the $23,500.00 should have been capitalized to account 1300."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8896570317bb41c081e7688eea540ae5",
+      "criteria": "States that the Whitfield account 5000 treatment is inaccurate or requires correction because the $23,500.00 should have been capitalized to account 1300.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_085643cfb1f24489bcb54a7acaaf1ae9",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that trust paid costs labeled Hard in the ledger total $26,450.00 (acceptable value is $26,450.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_085643cfb1f24489bcb54a7acaaf1ae9",
+      "criteria": "States that trust paid costs labeled Hard in the ledger total $26,450.00 (acceptable value is $26,450.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_dd1f0312fb99491f84988918d0d3fa77",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that trust paid costs should not be posted to Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) because they were paid directly from IOLTA."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_dd1f0312fb99491f84988918d0d3fa77",
+      "criteria": "States that trust paid costs should not be posted to Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) because they were paid directly from IOLTA.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_c1c9afb0d32147ba8464137f3525556b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Identifies no more than three Heritage Litigation Support document production rows labeled Soft that should be classified as Hard."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_c1c9afb0d32147ba8464137f3525556b",
+      "criteria": "Identifies no more than three Heritage Litigation Support document production rows labeled Soft that should be classified as Hard.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_a23bbc2ae0af41d38a05537d7e286375",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support hard/soft workpaper label issue totals $2,950.00 (acceptable value is $2,950.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_a23bbc2ae0af41d38a05537d7e286375",
+      "criteria": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support hard/soft workpaper label issue totals $2,950.00 (acceptable value is $2,950.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_1f363da16332471ba2bb9a935333ec3e",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that after the Heritage workpaper label correction, trust paid policy hard costs total $29,400.00 (acceptable value is $29,400.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_1f363da16332471ba2bb9a935333ec3e",
+      "criteria": "States that after the Heritage workpaper label correction, trust paid policy hard costs total $29,400.00 (acceptable value is $29,400.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_5de8196ad11f4f75957889d7419f75e6",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the corrected trust paid policy hard costs tie to IOLTA cost disbursements."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_5de8196ad11f4f75957889d7419f75e6",
+      "criteria": "States that the corrected trust paid policy hard costs tie to IOLTA cost disbursements.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_fad35ec13fb64a19b24d9444585740bb",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support issue has no GL impact."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_fad35ec13fb64a19b24d9444585740bb",
+      "criteria": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support issue has no GL impact.",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_cfecb3c0354948119ecd0960a0304483",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Proposes the journal entry to correct the Whitfield contract attorney misclassification as $23,500.00 Dr Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300), Cr Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) (acceptable value is $23,500.00)."
+      "verifier_id": "ver_cfecb3c0354948119ecd0960a0304483",
+      "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry to correct the Whitfield contract attorney misclassification as $23,500.00 Dr Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300), Cr Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) (acceptable value is $23,500.00).",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "1) Client cost advance ledger ending balance for account 1300: $0.00\n2) QBO GL ending balance for account 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs: $0.00\n3) Difference between the client cost advance ledger and QBO account 1300: $0.00\n4) Relevant QBO account 1300 activity:\n-Opening balance: Dr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $45,000.00\n- Whitfield settlement cost recovery: Cr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $45,000.00, posted on JE-OB-000843 for matter M-2024-0018\n5) Cost classification and capitalization issues:\n- QBO includes six Whitfield matter M-2024-0018 AP bill lines posted to 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct instead of account 1300. The six lines are JE-BILL-2024-00333 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00322 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00334 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00323 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00330 $3,500.00, and JE-BILL-2024-00324 $4,000.00, totaling $23,500.00.\n- The Whitfield account 5000 total is made up of Jennifer Kao Law PLLC $12,000.00, Westfield Legal Services LLC $8,000.00, and Marcus Avila, Esq. $3,500.00.\n-The Whitfield cost recovery addendum states that matter direct contract attorney services on the Whitfield contingency matter are reimbursable client costs to be tracked as client cost advances when firm paid.\n- The $23,500.00 of Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs was not capitalized to 1300.\n- The $23,500.00 was not included in the $45,000.00 Whitfield settlement cost reimbursement shown in the settlement summary.\n- Account 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct totals $76,000.00 for the year. Of that amount, $52,500.00 relates to non Whitfield matters and is outside the 1300 Whitfield capitalization issue.\n- Trust paid costs labeled Hard in the ledger total $26,450.00 and were correctly excluded from account 1300 because they were paid directly from IOLTA.\n- Three Heritage Litigation Support document production rows are labeled Soft in the ledger but should be classified as Hard under the policy because third party document production is a hard cost. The Heritage label issue totals $2,950.00.\n- The Heritage issue has no GL impact because the items were paid directly from IOLTA.\n- After the Heritage label correction, trust paid policy hard costs total $29,400.00 and tie to IOLTA cost disbursements.\n- Clio billed/reimbursed client cost recoveries total $47,587.09 and tie to QBO account 4300; they are outside the 1300 asset balance.\n6) Reconciliation conclusion:\nThe ledger and QBO account 1300 tie at $0.00 before correction. However, the $23,500.00 of Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs should have been capitalized to account 1300 under the Whitfield cost recovery addendum and were incorrectly expensed to account 5000.\n7) Correcting journal entry:\nDr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $23,500.00\nCr 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct $23,500.00",

tasks/world_9_task_17.json

@@ -15,34 +15,34 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_ec10ffe4c6ff4b64b17b5a4dd39c9d1e",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correcting journal entry for the stub accrual error is $2,197.80 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), Cr Salaries-Of-Counsel (or Account 6010) (acceptable range $2,196.80 to $2,198.80)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_ec10ffe4c6ff4b64b17b5a4dd39c9d1e",
+      "criteria": "States that the correcting journal entry for the stub accrual error is $2,197.80 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), Cr Salaries-Of-Counsel (or Account 6010) (acceptable range $2,196.80 to $2,198.80)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_18877263b4b045d6bae3503da96b4db4",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correcting journal entry for PTO accrual error is $9.15 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), $9.15 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (acceptable range is $9.10 to $9.20)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_18877263b4b045d6bae3503da96b4db4",
+      "criteria": "States that the correcting journal entry for PTO accrual error is $9.15 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), $9.15 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (acceptable range is $9.10 to $9.20)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e878b4721860494db10597547151bc4b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correct Litigation practice group total is $210,900.93 (acceptable range is $210,899.93 to $210,901.93)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e878b4721860494db10597547151bc4b",
+      "criteria": "States that the correct Litigation practice group total is $210,900.93 (acceptable range is $210,899.93 to $210,901.93)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_ecad6cc1841540eb875964e329b89d9b",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correct Corporate-M&A practice group total is $120,957.80 (acceptable range is $120,956.80 to $120,958.80)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_ecad6cc1841540eb875964e329b89d9b",
+      "criteria": "States that the correct Corporate-M&A practice group total is $120,957.80 (acceptable range is $120,956.80 to $120,958.80)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_1868e8dc00074219b5431a27b1babd40",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correct Real Estate practice group total is $57,488.38 (acceptable range is $57,487.38 to $57,489.38)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_1868e8dc00074219b5431a27b1babd40",
+      "criteria": "States that the correct Real Estate practice group total is $57,488.38 (acceptable range is $57,487.38 to $57,489.38)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_0122ded6baed4e368be874a572adb7aa",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States that the correct Firm practice group total is $33,352.82 (acceptable value $33,352.82)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_0122ded6baed4e368be874a572adb7aa",
+      "criteria": "States that the correct Firm practice group total is $33,352.82 (acceptable value $33,352.82)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Correcting JE #1: $2,197.80 Dr 6000 Salaries-Associates, Cr 6010 Salaries-Of-Counsel\nCorrecting JE #2: $9.15 Dr 6000 Salaries-Associates, Cr 2100 Accrued Payroll\n\nLitigation: $210,900.93\nCorporate-M&A: $120,957.80\nReal Estate: $57,488.38\nFirm: $33,352.82",

tasks/world_9_task_23.json

@@ -10,84 +10,84 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_8cc07e662eea45399088a2cc23c0ffa4",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for October are $444,138.01 (Acceptable range is $444,133.01 to $444,143.01)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8cc07e662eea45399088a2cc23c0ffa4",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for October are $444,138.01 (Acceptable range is $444,133.01 to $444,143.01)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b8bd16da9cfc4521a34e50d6be3182c4",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for November are $328,465.18 (Acceptable range is $328,460.18 to $328,470.18)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b8bd16da9cfc4521a34e50d6be3182c4",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for November are $328,465.18 (Acceptable range is $328,460.18 to $328,470.18)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_cce80ba2a77a4d9a9e7244d2fdac4f87",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for December are $368,729.02 (Acceptable range is $368,724.02 to $368,734.02)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_cce80ba2a77a4d9a9e7244d2fdac4f87",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for December are $368,729.02 (Acceptable range is $368,724.02 to $368,734.02)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_d39d06dee0f645d180920f4ae5bb6f73",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Litigation collections for October are $306,055.05 (Acceptable range is $306,050.05 to $306,060.05)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_d39d06dee0f645d180920f4ae5bb6f73",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for October are $306,055.05 (Acceptable range is $306,050.05 to $306,060.05)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_a9d3b9b0a53e451691856218d63081d5",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Litigation collections for November are $197,204.17 (Acceptable range is $197,199.17 to $197,209.17)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_a9d3b9b0a53e451691856218d63081d5",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for November are $197,204.17 (Acceptable range is $197,199.17 to $197,209.17)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_19cb86ad1d8c4a24a7dbad93541eb70e",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Litigation collections for December are $421,432.60 (Acceptable range is $421,427.60 to $421,437.60)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_19cb86ad1d8c4a24a7dbad93541eb70e",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for December are $421,432.60 (Acceptable range is $421,427.60 to $421,437.60)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_fab03b824aea4336bf37a7a7a37bab21",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Real Estate collections for October are $320,128.54 (Acceptable range is $320,123.54 to $320,133.54)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_fab03b824aea4336bf37a7a7a37bab21",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for October are $320,128.54 (Acceptable range is $320,123.54 to $320,133.54)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_8e11c3d2e417484b96611fd1e007e9d1",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Real Estate collections for November are $150,418.25 (Acceptable range is $150,413.25 to $150,423.25)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_8e11c3d2e417484b96611fd1e007e9d1",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for November are $150,418.25 (Acceptable range is $150,413.25 to $150,423.25)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_b5b2881503c44b45840495b7afcdb7b2",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies Real Estate collections for December are $105,955.56 (Acceptable range is $105,950.56 to $105,960.56)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_b5b2881503c44b45840495b7afcdb7b2",
+      "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for December are $105,955.56 (Acceptable range is $105,950.56 to $105,960.56)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_4c7f6852076e4f80af26c88c82111861",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Flags the change in Corporate-M&A collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -26% (Acceptable value is -26%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4c7f6852076e4f80af26c88c82111861",
+      "criteria": "Flags the change in Corporate-M&A collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -26% (Acceptable value is -26%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_fc471beb35094c479445d9adf6ce332d",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -36% (Acceptable value is -36%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_fc471beb35094c479445d9adf6ce332d",
+      "criteria": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -36% (Acceptable value is -36%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_858346455ee64d37bfd3de5717337481",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of +114% (Acceptable value is 114%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_858346455ee64d37bfd3de5717337481",
+      "criteria": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of +114% (Acceptable value is 114%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_9c9b3a649374434e944d038c1c3d9fe2",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -53% (Acceptable value is -53%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_9c9b3a649374434e944d038c1c3d9fe2",
+      "criteria": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -53% (Acceptable value is -53%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_2172b335196c4fc99676599b10767209",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of -30% (Acceptable value is -30%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_2172b335196c4fc99676599b10767209",
+      "criteria": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of -30% (Acceptable value is -30%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_9dd1a1d53dbf4e99837669e6d8255851",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)",
-      "description": "Identifies the largest change in collections from November to December for Real Estate was Eastgate Plaza Development LLC. "
+      "verifier_id": "ver_9dd1a1d53dbf4e99837669e6d8255851",
+      "criteria": "Identifies the largest change in collections from November to December for Real Estate was Eastgate Plaza Development LLC. ",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_0b50d3f3b5ff462ba54a88e61308d230",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Identifies no more than five practice-group MoM changes as crossing the 15% threshold"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_0b50d3f3b5ff462ba54a88e61308d230",
+      "criteria": "Identifies no more than five practice-group MoM changes as crossing the 15% threshold",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Collections Analysis by Practice Group, October to December 2024 - Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP\n\nBasis: collections are payments received per the Clio billing export, grouped into classes per the client matter list. Per the management memo, December includes the $46,800.52 Allerton Pharmaceuticals check received against a previously written-off invoice (deposit clears in January), and the returned Pemberton Office Holdings LLC check of $200,632.47 is excluded from the analysis.\n\nPart 1: Collections per month by class\n\nCorporate-M&A\nOctober $444,138.01\nNovember $328,465.18\nDecember $368,729.02\n\nLitigation\nOctober $306,055.05\nNovember $197,204.17\nDecember $421,432.60\n\nReal Estate\nOctober $320,128.54\nNovember $150,418.25\nDecember $105,955.56\n\nPart 2: Month over month changes greater than 15% in either direction\n\nCorporate-M&A\nOctober to November: -26%, flagged\n\nLitigation\nOctober to November: -36%, flagged\nNovember to December: +114%, flagged\n\nReal Estate\nOctober to November: -53%, flagged\nNovember to December: -30%, flagged\n\nThe largest dollar fluctuation between November and December in Real Estate is Eastgate Plaza Development LLC, whose collections dropped from $61,309.57 in November to $0.00 in December.",

tasks/world_9_task_26.json

@@ -16,19 +16,19 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_2284c61db4924a078ad18e0e5acae8c2",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States total FY2024 performance compensation is $227,257.06 (acceptable range $227,252.06 to $227,262.06)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_2284c61db4924a078ad18e0e5acae8c2",
+      "criteria": "States total FY2024 performance compensation is $227,257.06 (acceptable range $227,252.06 to $227,262.06)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_cabdc5b2ac294a379f961fff3463e2cc",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States net adjusting entry amount to true up Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) is $29,257.06 (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_cabdc5b2ac294a379f961fff3463e2cc",
+      "criteria": "States net adjusting entry amount to true up Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) is $29,257.06 (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_f2d513c634e9417fa15f694a581fc5da",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "Proposes the journal entry for the partner compensation true-up as $29,257.06 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_f2d513c634e9417fa15f694a581fc5da",
+      "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for the partner compensation true-up as $29,257.06 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "FY2024 partner guaranteed payment true-up\n\nTotal FY2024 performance compensation (all equity partners): $227,257.06\n\nNet adjusting entry to true up account 6200: $29,257.06\n\nDr 6200 Partner Guaranteed Payments  $29,257.06\nCr 2050 Accrued Expenses             $29,257.06",

tasks/world_9_task_30.json

@@ -9,29 +9,29 @@
   ],
   "rubric": [
     {
-      "id": "ver_7e889c8945924c8583433d493fc8e485",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket current is 72.80% (Acceptable value is 72.80%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_7e889c8945924c8583433d493fc8e485",
+      "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket current is 72.80% (Acceptable value is 72.80%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_ccdedd76d1994b68943831b693321496",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 1-30 days is 10.85% (Acceptable value is 10.85%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_ccdedd76d1994b68943831b693321496",
+      "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 1-30 days is 10.85% (Acceptable value is 10.85%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_0b4ec5c259cc4bcbb3043ca9596fded4",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 31-60 days is 2.04% (Acceptable value is 2.04%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_0b4ec5c259cc4bcbb3043ca9596fded4",
+      "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 31-60 days is 2.04% (Acceptable value is 2.04%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_e55ac0095f5140aa9967e87a54a397b9",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 61-90 days is 5.25% (Acceptable value is 5.25%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_e55ac0095f5140aa9967e87a54a397b9",
+      "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 61-90 days is 5.25% (Acceptable value is 5.25%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     },
     {
-      "id": "ver_4bdf2906d4914625b29f206743dc9380",
-      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)",
-      "description": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket >90 days is 9.06% (Acceptable value is 9.06%)"
+      "verifier_id": "ver_4bdf2906d4914625b29f206743dc9380",
+      "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket >90 days is 9.06% (Acceptable value is 9.06%)",
+      "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
     }
   ],
   "gold_output": "Aging Bucket in days\t  --      Exposure in %\nCurrent\t                      --        72.80%\n1-30\t                              --        10.85%\n31-60 \t                          --         2.04%\n61-90 \t                          --         5.25%\n>90\t                              --         9.06%",

tasks_and_rubrics.json

@@ -0,0 +1,723 @@
+[
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_baa139877a4d4fbfa601df50610262d5",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 4",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Review the contingency case status and the journal entry register, together with relevant documents, and propose a journal entry where applicable for all relevant transactions. If entries have already been posted into the QBO journal entry register 2024 document, do not propose a journal entry.\n\nFor all of the above, focus on the settled case.\n\nProvide answers in the console, present amounts in $, and round numeric data to the nearest whole number, but do not round intermediate values.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Proposed JE\nDate: 12/31/2024\nMemo: Whitfield post-settlement administrator holdback - reversal of excess contingency fee\t\t\t\nAccount                                             --     Debit       --    Credit\n4200 Contingency Fee Revenue \t\t  --     $29,700\t  --\n2050 Accrued Expenses                     --\t                  --    $29,700",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "workpaper_contingency_case_status_2024.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_client_cost_advance_ledger_2024.xlsx",
+      "qbo_journal_entry_register_2024.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_whitfield_settlement_summary.xlsx",
+      "Whitfield_PostSettlement_Holdback_Memo.pdf"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Data Entry",
+      "subcategory": "Revenue / contingency",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 1.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_6ab475c82b184f7282b9ad3938aa518b",
+        "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for Whitfield post-settlement holdback as $29,700 Dr Contingency Fee Revenue (or Account 4200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable value is $29,700)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_eb52d163a3cc4863a9acd057d88d13ad",
+        "criteria": "Identifies no more than one journal entry.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_848b939d069a4378b3e6e1d989aca7fc",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 5",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "1) Reconcile December payroll expense between the Gusto register and QBO payroll-related accounts. Output the reconciling variances.\n2) Output the final balance of 6000 Salaries Associates and 6010 Salaries Of-Counsel\n\nCheck the memo that has been shared by the acting Controller through Dec 31. Present numeric data in $ and rounded to two decimals.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "December 2024 Payroll Reconciliation, Gusto to QBO - Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP\n\nReconciliation: December Gusto payroll (runs PR-25 and PR-26) totals $368,078.87 and ties to the QBO payroll postings account by account with no variance. QBO December payroll expense totals $462,936.95. The reconciling variances are the two year-end accruals that have no Gusto counterpart: the December 20-31 stub period accrual of $69,814.33 (AJE-2024-03) and the year-end PTO accrual of $25,043.75 (AJE-2024-04). Gusto plus the two accruals equals QBO exactly, for a total variance of $94,858.08.\n\nInconsistency within the reconciliation work already done: the stub accrual as posted carries 6000 Salaries - Associates at $24,175.83 and 6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel at $17,362.63, while the payroll accrual workpaper's per-employee arithmetic gives $26,373.63 for the five Associates and $15,164.83 for the two Of-Counsel. The controller memo's explanation that $2,197.80 was intentionally reclassified for Hannah Whitfield does not verify against the records: her actual stub accrual is $4,450.55, not $2,197.80, and the PTO accrual carries no matching reclassification. The posted split is a $2,197.80 posting error between 6000 and 6010.\n\nFinal balances after correcting the $2,197.80 posting error:\n6000 Salaries - Associates: $933,842.59\n6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel: $528,191.82",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "gusto_payroll_register_2024.csv",
+      "qbo_general_ledger_detail_2024.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_payroll_accrual_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_pto_accrual_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "attorney_staff_roster.xlsx",
+      "partner_compensation_schedule.xlsx",
+      "gusto_employee_earnings_summary_2024.xlsx",
+      "Controller Memo 12_31.txt"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Reconciliation",
+      "subcategory": "Payroll rec",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 4.0,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_c57e736c563d46c68750238ebc0a7cb6",
+        "criteria": "States that the Stub Period Accrual (Dec 20-31) reconciling variance is $69,814.33 (acceptable range is $69,814.32 to $69,814.34)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_7422fc2cab9a4c768a3f9a95e285dc8b",
+        "criteria": "States that the PTO Year-End Accrual reconciling variance is $25,043.75 (acceptable range is $25,043.74 to $25,043.76)         ",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_2555235942ac4a1c86a87cf3fb92d2aa",
+        "criteria": "States that 6000 Salaries - Associates final balance is $933,842.59 (acceptable range is $933,842.58 to $933,842.60)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_5a68bb4506f44891a47fd9b769238bf4",
+        "criteria": "States that 6010 Salaries - Of-Counsel final balance is $528,191.82 (acceptable range is $528,191.81 to $528,191.83)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_f0d206c41e7b4a918b24dc38f5f2eccc",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 6",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Prepare the December payroll from Gusto register for W-2 employees and partner guaranteed payments from partner compensation schedule.  Verify in the GL that all partner payments are booked in guaranteed payment accounts.  Check variances in any approved pay vs actual pay.  \n\nThe Requested Output:\n1) The JEs for December Payroll for Associate and Partner Guaranteed Payments Marcus Holloway\n2) Output total partner payment in the company. \n3) If there are variances in the partner payment for Marcus Holloway, calculate the variance amount spotted. \n\nPlease provide JE with Debits/Credits, Amount, Account Number and Account Names.  Provide your answers in the console and round all values to two decimal places.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Debit 6000 Salaries - Associates 157,538.48\nDebit 6100 Employer Payroll Taxes 7,610.56\nDebit 6120 401(k) Employer Match 4,726.16\nCredit 2100 Accrued Payroll 105,999.18\nCredit 2200 Payroll Taxes Payable 57,667.86\nCredit 2210 401(k) Withholding Payable 4,726.16\nCredit 2220 Health Insurance Withholding Payable 1,482.00\nDebit 6200 Partner Guaranteed Payments 49,500.00\nCredit 1000 Operating Checking - First Keystone Bank 49,500.00\n\nGuaranteed payments are prepared from the compensation schedule at Marcus Holloway's approved rate of $49,500.00. The GL recorded $48,000.00 actually paid; the $1,500.00 monthly difference ($18,000.00 for the year) is the variance identified below.\n\nAll monthly guaranteed payments are booked to account 6200; the Q4 profit distributions of $799,999.98 are booked to equity account 3100 (Partner Draws), outside guaranteed payments. Total partner payments in the company are $5,383,999.98.\n\nVariance of $1,500.00 for Marcus Holloway - compensation basis ($49,500.00) vs. compensation ledger ($48,000.00).",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "gusto_payroll_register_2024.csv",
+      "partner_compensation_schedule.xlsx",
+      "qbo_general_ledger_detail_2024.xlsx"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Schedules & Accruals",
+      "subcategory": "Payroll + Partner Compensation",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 2.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_d06f80ee48b04b23a70a9272c6e94acd",
+        "criteria": "States $157,538.48 Dr Salaries - Associates (or Account 6000) (Acceptable value is $157,538.48)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e7ce16b02c87464f965dbfe6f1f33487",
+        "criteria": "States $7,610.56 Dr Employer Payroll Taxes (or Account 6100) (Acceptable value is $7,610.56)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_0a99d2dab0234fa8a852b378b0ce1df3",
+        "criteria": "States $4,726.16 Cr 2210 401(k) Withholding Payable (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_675cdb360e4e495093a206d8c124a57b",
+        "criteria": "States $105,999.18 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (Acceptable value is $105,999.18)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_71ac1360b1c943ea85aa6794b8ef9076",
+        "criteria": "States $57,667.86 Cr Payroll Taxes Payable (or Account 2200) (Acceptable value is $57,667.86)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_5364ba1004994913a0dadee2b1a6c6c1",
+        "criteria": "States $4,726.16 Dr 6120 401(k) Employer Match (Acceptable value is $4,726.16)\n\n",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_fffbe3602fe24e438eb3b12083374155",
+        "criteria": "States $1,482.00 Cr Health Insurance Withholding Payable (or Account 2220) (Acceptable value is $1,482.00)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_da3dd83e6f11409581308b9c110a9967",
+        "criteria": "States $49,500.00 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e672c42404294f34a763d69b346365a6",
+        "criteria": "States $49,500.00 Cr Operating Checking - First Keystone Bank (or Account 1000) (Acceptable value is $49,500.00)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8c9386d755b44a7cacbcb8fb7f001836",
+        "criteria": "States total partner payment in the company is $5,383,999.98 (Acceptable value is $5,383,999.98)\n",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_996a700ffd99456485d593f93c4bac5f",
+        "criteria": "States there is a variance of $1,500.00 for Marcus Holloway (Acceptable value is $1,500.00)\n",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_0ce139ba2b5a407f96788a2dc42bca30",
+        "criteria": "States that all partner guaranteed payments are booked to Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) and that the Q4 profit distributions are booked to equity Partner Draws (or Account 3100), outside guaranteed payments",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_55332112bcb94ff4b489844dba2d91e0",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 7",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Using the pre-adjustment December 31, 2024 unbilled work-in-process schedule, finalize the year-end WIP by applying the matter-level realization adjustments and the approved year-end write-downs called out by management in the matter status memo.\n\nProvide the post-adjustment unbilled WIP by practice group and in total, along with the net year-end adjustment journal entry.\n\nDo not round intermediate calculations. Round final answers to two decimal places. Answer in console. ",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Unbilled work-in-process by practice group\nPractice group               --     Pre-adjustment WIP        --    Post-adjustment WIP      --   Year-end decrease\nLitigation                       --       $112,699.64                   --          $93,116.80                --    $19,582.84\nCorporate-M&A            --        $88,750.80                    --          $72,756.93                --    $15,993.87\nReal Estate                     --        $45,557.06                    --          $41,664.37                --    $  3,892.69\nTotal                              --       $247,007.50                    --        $207,538.10                --    $39,469.40\n\n\nNet year-end adjustment JE:\nDate:12/31/2024\nMemo: To record year-end realization and approved write-down adjustments to unbilled WIP.\nAccount                                                   --        Debit               --      Credit\n4900 Fee Discounts and Write-Downs    --      $39,469.40         --  \n1200 Unbilled WIP                                   --                                --     $39,469.40",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "workpaper_realization_rate_analysis_2024.xlsx",
+      "clio_billing_export_2024.csv",
+      "engagement_letter_summary_2024.xlsx",
+      "T1_Year_End_WIP_Schedule.pdf",
+      "Year_End_WIP_Realization_Methodology_Memo.pdf",
+      "Year_End_Matter_Status_Update.pdf"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Schedules & Accruals",
+      "subcategory": "WIP rollforward",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 3.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_36b10ea69d0b49529f0c6e497de10147",
+        "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Litigation practice group is $93,116.80 (acceptable range $93,111.80 to $93,121.80)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8447e100c6c041be913c659e05c5e8e9",
+        "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Corporate-M&A practice group is $72,756.93 (acceptable range $72,751.93 to $72,761.93)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_319999e8e8ec4a0b93cf02f74223b515",
+        "criteria": "States the post-adjustment unbilled WIP for the Real Estate practice group is $41,664.37 (acceptable range $41,659.37 to $41,669.37)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_6130ca866a7845229741adf14f3a2cbd",
+        "criteria": "States the total post-adjustment unbilled WIP is $207,538.10 (acceptable range $207,533.10 to $207,543.10)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e6f0ceff3d5847a49227d6e028395f11",
+        "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for the year-end WIP adjustment as $39,469.40 Dr Fee Discounts and Write-Downs (or Account 4900), Cr Unbilled WIP (or Account 1200) (Acceptable value is $39,469.40)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_3155ba0f5d37465cb051c89ead5ec9bb",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 13",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP needs the December 2024 accounts receivable reconciliation between Clio (billing system) and QuickBooks Online (accounting system) finalized. A staff accountant prepared a draft reconciliation comparing Clio billing totals to QBO AR by client matter, and the billing supervisor and controller each reviewed the draft and provided guidance on several items. Using the provided files, determine the correct total AR balance per QBO and compare it to the Clio outstanding balance. Evaluate each matter-level variance identified in the draft, and state the correct December write-down and write-off totals - identify any misclassified amounts or incorrect variances, calculate the correct corresponding balances, and state the final reconciliation result with any required corrections.\n\nProvide all numerical values to two decimals, and share your answer in the console.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "AR Reconciliation, Clio to QBO - December 31, 2024\n\nTotal AR comparison: The correct QBO AR balance is $1,729,138.00 per the General Ledger account 1100 ending balance. The Clio outstanding balance per the billing export is also $1,729,138.00, so the total-level variance is $0.00. The AR Aging Summary shows $1,729,013.00, which is $125.00 low due to the Bayshore subledger error noted below.\n\nMatter-level variance evaluation:\nBayshore (M-2024-0005): The $125.00 difference is an aging subledger error, not a real AR discrepancy. Clio and the General Ledger agree. The correct QBO AR for Bayshore is $23,818.10.\nNorthbridge (M-2024-0009): The draft variance of $8,773.31 is incorrect. The IOLTA payment is already reflected in the aging, so deducting it again double counts. The correct QBO AR for Northbridge is $22,010.66.\nCascade Foods (M-2024-0020): The draft variance of $7,059.28 is a draft error. The Clio balance already reflects the INV-2024-0232 write-down, so no processing lag exists. The correct QBO AR for Cascade Foods is $77,588.63.\n\nDecember write-down and write-off totals: The draft's combined $126,770.82 includes one misclassified item. Hartwell Construction INV-2024-0226 $897.44 is a write-off misclassified as a write-down. The correct December write-down total is $125,873.38 and the correct December write-off total is $897.44.\n\nFinal reconciliation result: After correcting the draft errors, Clio at $1,729,138.00 and QBO at $1,729,138.00 reconcile with a variance of $0.00.",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "clio_billing_export_2024.csv",
+      "qbo_ar_aging_summary_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "qbo_general_ledger_detail_2024.xlsx",
+      "Draft_AR_Reconciliation_Clio_QBO_Dec_2024.xlsx",
+      "Senior_Review_Notes_Dec_2024.pdf"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Reconciliation",
+      "subcategory": "AR rec",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 1.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_be7a5aa5f10a4be8ad915c1ff9253a76",
+        "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance as $1,729,138.00 (acceptable value is $1,729,138.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b0e387abc0524cf6bb4825d62ac7d965",
+        "criteria": "Concludes the total balance variance between Clio and QBO is $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_3f7f0a6af16e4f558f9f39504517d1be",
+        "criteria": "Explains the Bayshore (M-2024-0005) $125.00 difference as an aging subledger error rather than a real AR discrepancy.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4269edea06554f9d971af7747b5aea3d",
+        "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Bayshore as $23,818.10 (acceptable value is $23,818.10).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_3bc58f93bab44d83986218814623c26d",
+        "criteria": "Determines that the Northbridge (M-2024-0009) draft variance of $8,773.31 identified in the draft reconciliation is incorrect.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_443e8b6268734a14b26ce359387425ee",
+        "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Northbridge as $22,010.66 (acceptable value is $22,010.66).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b0be0ced66f447bc9bc889e7fda76098",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Hartwell Construction INV-2024-0226 $897.44 as a write-off misclassified as a write-down in the draft.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b292df9f650647f981c922eff9b6e8c5",
+        "criteria": "States the December write-down total as $125,873.38 (acceptable value is $125,873.38).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b0be6df02e344b98b2111dde12de3b80",
+        "criteria": "States the December write-off total as $897.44 (acceptable value is $897.44).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4e5208d8e548419cb69dedc5e578a469",
+        "criteria": "Determines that the Cascade Foods (M-2024-0020) variance of $7,059.28 identified in the draft reconciliation is an error.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_f81dbb0a982141948900a94d58bf9829",
+        "criteria": "States the QBO AR balance for Cascade Foods as $77,588.63 (acceptable value is $77,588.63).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_17749213131c468d9dad7ee801dd37fd",
+        "criteria": "States that after correcting the draft errors the reconciliation balances to $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_8654129a5aac4ca583a47ffcdea8ebc0",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 14",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Review the December client cost advance reconciliation. Reconcile the client cost advance ledger to the QBO/GL balance for client cost advances. Using the cost advance ledger methodology and provided support, verify whether hard costs that should be treated as client cost advances were capitalized and whether soft costs were expensed. Identify any discrepancies in cost classification or capitalization treatment that need to be resolved.\n\nRound all amounts to two decimal places. Do not round intermediary values. Provide your answer to the console.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "1) Client cost advance ledger ending balance for account 1300: $0.00\n2) QBO GL ending balance for account 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs: $0.00\n3) Difference between the client cost advance ledger and QBO account 1300: $0.00\n4) Relevant QBO account 1300 activity:\n-Opening balance: Dr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $45,000.00\n- Whitfield settlement cost recovery: Cr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $45,000.00, posted on JE-OB-000843 for matter M-2024-0018\n5) Cost classification and capitalization issues:\n- QBO includes six Whitfield matter M-2024-0018 AP bill lines posted to 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct instead of account 1300. The six lines are JE-BILL-2024-00333 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00322 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00334 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00323 $4,000.00, JE-BILL-2024-00330 $3,500.00, and JE-BILL-2024-00324 $4,000.00, totaling $23,500.00.\n- The Whitfield account 5000 total is made up of Jennifer Kao Law PLLC $12,000.00, Westfield Legal Services LLC $8,000.00, and Marcus Avila, Esq. $3,500.00.\n-The Whitfield cost recovery addendum states that matter direct contract attorney services on the Whitfield contingency matter are reimbursable client costs to be tracked as client cost advances when firm paid.\n- The $23,500.00 of Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs was not capitalized to 1300.\n- The $23,500.00 was not included in the $45,000.00 Whitfield settlement cost reimbursement shown in the settlement summary.\n- Account 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct totals $76,000.00 for the year. Of that amount, $52,500.00 relates to non Whitfield matters and is outside the 1300 Whitfield capitalization issue.\n- Trust paid costs labeled Hard in the ledger total $26,450.00 and were correctly excluded from account 1300 because they were paid directly from IOLTA.\n- Three Heritage Litigation Support document production rows are labeled Soft in the ledger but should be classified as Hard under the policy because third party document production is a hard cost. The Heritage label issue totals $2,950.00.\n- The Heritage issue has no GL impact because the items were paid directly from IOLTA.\n- After the Heritage label correction, trust paid policy hard costs total $29,400.00 and tie to IOLTA cost disbursements.\n- Clio billed/reimbursed client cost recoveries total $47,587.09 and tie to QBO account 4300; they are outside the 1300 asset balance.\n6) Reconciliation conclusion:\nThe ledger and QBO account 1300 tie at $0.00 before correction. However, the $23,500.00 of Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs should have been capitalized to account 1300 under the Whitfield cost recovery addendum and were incorrectly expensed to account 5000.\n7) Correcting journal entry:\nDr 1300 Client Cost Advances Hard Costs $23,500.00\nCr 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct $23,500.00",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "workpaper_client_cost_advance_ledger_2024.xlsx",
+      "qbo_general_ledger_detail_2024.xlsx",
+      "engagement_letter_summary_2024.xlsx",
+      "clio_billing_export_2024.csv",
+      "iolta_bank_transactions.csv",
+      "workpaper_whitfield_settlement_summary.xlsx",
+      "Whitfield_Contingency_Cost_Recovery_Addendum.pdf"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Reconciliation",
+      "subcategory": "Client cost rec",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 1.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4a222a154df44589a29ba6611cdbaeea",
+        "criteria": "Reports the client cost advance ledger ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_cadb3774d955427b982ef336f35dfd2c",
+        "criteria": "Reports the QBO GL ending balance for Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b98e77008a494cbaa098ebadb8c1c7d3",
+        "criteria": "Reports the difference between the client cost advance ledger and QBO Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) as $0.00 (acceptable value is $0.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_1648481e530a405eb653e6e5172ed67d",
+        "criteria": "States that QBO account 1300 includes an opening debit of $45,000.00 for Whitfield cost advances (acceptable value is $45,000.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_1cd21fbf592047eaac603b25ca71ec3c",
+        "criteria": "States that QBO account 1300 includes a Whitfield settlement cost recovery credit of $45,000.00 posted on JE-OB-000843 for matter M-2024-0018 (acceptable value is $45,000.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e7568a8ebc7641ceb331adec4006e09b",
+        "criteria": "Identifies the Whitfield M-2024-0018 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) AP bill lines as a capitalization issue.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_560bee44af05427bb62fc06692146627",
+        "criteria": "States that the Whitfield M-2024-0018 account 5000 contract attorney matter direct lines total $23,500.00 (acceptable value is $23,500.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_2d9f3d9b67394a23949fa9f5db3ebeb5",
+        "criteria": "States that Jennifer Kao Law PLLC accounts for $12,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $12,000.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_d6b29c8bbedb46be8fc9a267c6a2090f",
+        "criteria": "States that Westfield Legal Services LLC accounts for $8,000.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $8,000.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4db561562e8f4a3eab1e1e024359d796",
+        "criteria": "States that Marcus Avila, Esq. accounts for $3,500.00 of the Whitfield Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) issue (acceptable value is $3,500.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_bce32b42dac948cab4dc54534a9dd5f9",
+        "criteria": "States that the Whitfield cost recovery addendum supports treating matter direct contract attorney services on the Whitfield contingency matter as reimbursable client costs or client cost advances.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8104117f5c414be794927f40b829a813",
+        "criteria": "States that total QBO account 5000 Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct activity is $76,000.00 (acceptable value is $76,000.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_c1a95dde831644d7aa3c9653a1d4896a",
+        "criteria": "States that non Whitfield account 5000 matter direct activity totals $52,500.00 (acceptable value is $52,500.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b6eb46f2561046579e6ced5cf59abc7a",
+        "criteria": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not capitalized to account 1300.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e97f388f3f774750a48904a3f7a99a28",
+        "criteria": "States that the $23,500.00 Whitfield contract attorney matter direct costs were not included in the $45,000.00 Whitfield settlement cost reimbursement.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8896570317bb41c081e7688eea540ae5",
+        "criteria": "States that the Whitfield account 5000 treatment is inaccurate or requires correction because the $23,500.00 should have been capitalized to account 1300.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_085643cfb1f24489bcb54a7acaaf1ae9",
+        "criteria": "States that trust paid costs labeled Hard in the ledger total $26,450.00 (acceptable value is $26,450.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_dd1f0312fb99491f84988918d0d3fa77",
+        "criteria": "States that trust paid costs should not be posted to Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300) because they were paid directly from IOLTA.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_c1c9afb0d32147ba8464137f3525556b",
+        "criteria": "Identifies no more than three Heritage Litigation Support document production rows labeled Soft that should be classified as Hard.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_a23bbc2ae0af41d38a05537d7e286375",
+        "criteria": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support hard/soft workpaper label issue totals $2,950.00 (acceptable value is $2,950.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_1f363da16332471ba2bb9a935333ec3e",
+        "criteria": "States that after the Heritage workpaper label correction, trust paid policy hard costs total $29,400.00 (acceptable value is $29,400.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_5de8196ad11f4f75957889d7419f75e6",
+        "criteria": "States that the corrected trust paid policy hard costs tie to IOLTA cost disbursements.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_fad35ec13fb64a19b24d9444585740bb",
+        "criteria": "States that the Heritage Litigation Support issue has no GL impact.",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_cfecb3c0354948119ecd0960a0304483",
+        "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry to correct the Whitfield contract attorney misclassification as $23,500.00 Dr Client Cost Advances Hard Costs (or Account 1300), Cr Contract Attorney Fees Matter Direct (or Account 5000) (acceptable value is $23,500.00).",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_73b89e1fd7744eaa83c1b39fecd1183a",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 17",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Reconcile December payroll expense by practice group between the Gusto register and QBO. Determine the correct total for each practice group and propose any correcting entries, including for any inconsistencies within the reconciliation work done already.\n\nProvide the answers directly in the console. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round final answers to two decimals.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Correcting JE #1: $2,197.80 Dr 6000 Salaries-Associates, Cr 6010 Salaries-Of-Counsel\nCorrecting JE #2: $9.15 Dr 6000 Salaries-Associates, Cr 2100 Accrued Payroll\n\nLitigation: $210,900.93\nCorporate-M&A: $120,957.80\nReal Estate: $57,488.38\nFirm: $33,352.82",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "gusto_payroll_register_2024.csv",
+      "workpaper_payroll_accrual_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_pto_accrual_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "workpaper_year_end_AJEs_2024.xlsx",
+      "qbo_profit_and_loss_by_class_2024.xlsx",
+      "december_payroll_practice_group_allocation.xlsx",
+      "email_payroll_reconciliation_notes.txt",
+      "memo_payroll_accrual_methodology.txt"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Reconciliation",
+      "subcategory": "Payroll rec",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 3.5,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_ec10ffe4c6ff4b64b17b5a4dd39c9d1e",
+        "criteria": "States that the correcting journal entry for the stub accrual error is $2,197.80 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), Cr Salaries-Of-Counsel (or Account 6010) (acceptable range $2,196.80 to $2,198.80)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_18877263b4b045d6bae3503da96b4db4",
+        "criteria": "States that the correcting journal entry for PTO accrual error is $9.15 Dr Salaries-Associates (or Account 6000), $9.15 Cr Accrued Payroll (or Account 2100) (acceptable range is $9.10 to $9.20)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e878b4721860494db10597547151bc4b",
+        "criteria": "States that the correct Litigation practice group total is $210,900.93 (acceptable range is $210,899.93 to $210,901.93)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_ecad6cc1841540eb875964e329b89d9b",
+        "criteria": "States that the correct Corporate-M&A practice group total is $120,957.80 (acceptable range is $120,956.80 to $120,958.80)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_1868e8dc00074219b5431a27b1babd40",
+        "criteria": "States that the correct Real Estate practice group total is $57,488.38 (acceptable range is $57,487.38 to $57,489.38)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_0122ded6baed4e368be874a572adb7aa",
+        "criteria": "States that the correct Firm practice group total is $33,352.82 (acceptable value $33,352.82)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_6140e09e1ce6482c8b4cfcdc007f758c",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 23",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Analyze collections for the last three months by identifying the collections per month for each class and flagging any changes that were >15% month over month within this time frame. Round change % to the nearest whole %. What customer caused the largest $ fluctuation between November and December in Real Estate?",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Collections Analysis by Practice Group, October to December 2024 - Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP\n\nBasis: collections are payments received per the Clio billing export, grouped into classes per the client matter list. Per the management memo, December includes the $46,800.52 Allerton Pharmaceuticals check received against a previously written-off invoice (deposit clears in January), and the returned Pemberton Office Holdings LLC check of $200,632.47 is excluded from the analysis.\n\nPart 1: Collections per month by class\n\nCorporate-M&A\nOctober $444,138.01\nNovember $328,465.18\nDecember $368,729.02\n\nLitigation\nOctober $306,055.05\nNovember $197,204.17\nDecember $421,432.60\n\nReal Estate\nOctober $320,128.54\nNovember $150,418.25\nDecember $105,955.56\n\nPart 2: Month over month changes greater than 15% in either direction\n\nCorporate-M&A\nOctober to November: -26%, flagged\n\nLitigation\nOctober to November: -36%, flagged\nNovember to December: +114%, flagged\n\nReal Estate\nOctober to November: -53%, flagged\nNovember to December: -30%, flagged\n\nThe largest dollar fluctuation between November and December in Real Estate is Eastgate Plaza Development LLC, whose collections dropped from $61,309.57 in November to $0.00 in December.",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "client_matter_list.xlsx",
+      "clio_billing_export_2024.csv",
+      "Management Memo.docx"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Variance Analysis",
+      "subcategory": "MoM revenue",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 2.0,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8cc07e662eea45399088a2cc23c0ffa4",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for October are $444,138.01 (Acceptable range is $444,133.01 to $444,143.01)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b8bd16da9cfc4521a34e50d6be3182c4",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for November are $328,465.18 (Acceptable range is $328,460.18 to $328,470.18)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_cce80ba2a77a4d9a9e7244d2fdac4f87",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Corporate-M&A collections for December are $368,729.02 (Acceptable range is $368,724.02 to $368,734.02)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_d39d06dee0f645d180920f4ae5bb6f73",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for October are $306,055.05 (Acceptable range is $306,050.05 to $306,060.05)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_a9d3b9b0a53e451691856218d63081d5",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for November are $197,204.17 (Acceptable range is $197,199.17 to $197,209.17)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_19cb86ad1d8c4a24a7dbad93541eb70e",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Litigation collections for December are $421,432.60 (Acceptable range is $421,427.60 to $421,437.60)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_fab03b824aea4336bf37a7a7a37bab21",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for October are $320,128.54 (Acceptable range is $320,123.54 to $320,133.54)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_8e11c3d2e417484b96611fd1e007e9d1",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for November are $150,418.25 (Acceptable range is $150,413.25 to $150,423.25)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_b5b2881503c44b45840495b7afcdb7b2",
+        "criteria": "Identifies Real Estate collections for December are $105,955.56 (Acceptable range is $105,950.56 to $105,960.56)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4c7f6852076e4f80af26c88c82111861",
+        "criteria": "Flags the change in Corporate-M&A collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -26% (Acceptable value is -26%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_fc471beb35094c479445d9adf6ce332d",
+        "criteria": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -36% (Acceptable value is -36%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_858346455ee64d37bfd3de5717337481",
+        "criteria": "Flags the change in Litigation collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of +114% (Acceptable value is 114%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_9c9b3a649374434e944d038c1c3d9fe2",
+        "criteria": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between October and November with a change of -53% (Acceptable value is -53%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_2172b335196c4fc99676599b10767209",
+        "criteria": "Flags the change in Real Estate collections as being above the 15% threshold between November and December with a change of -30% (Acceptable value is -30%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_9dd1a1d53dbf4e99837669e6d8255851",
+        "criteria": "Identifies the largest change in collections from November to December for Real Estate was Eastgate Plaza Development LLC. ",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (qualitative)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_0b50d3f3b5ff462ba54a88e61308d230",
+        "criteria": "Identifies no more than five practice-group MoM changes as crossing the 15% threshold",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_33d901304f4f48179e555ada729146c4",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 26",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Prepare the year-end partner guaranteed payment true-up schedule. Compute each equity partner's performance compensation and the net adjusting entry. State the following:\n(1) the total FY2024 performance compensation across all equity partners,\n(2) the net adjusting entry amount required to true up account 6200, and\n(3) the journal entry accounts to debit and credit.\n\nProvide answers in the console. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round final answers to two decimal places.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "FY2024 partner guaranteed payment true-up\n\nTotal FY2024 performance compensation (all equity partners): $227,257.06\n\nNet adjusting entry to true up account 6200: $29,257.06\n\nDr 6200 Partner Guaranteed Payments  $29,257.06\nCr 2050 Accrued Expenses             $29,257.06",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "sterling_partnership_agreement_fy2024.pdf",
+      "qbo_closing_trial_balance_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "partner_administration_register_2024.csv",
+      "billing_realization_summary_fy2024.csv",
+      "fy2023_partner_compensation_trueup.csv",
+      "engagement_letter_summary_2024.xlsx",
+      "partner_compensation_schedule.xlsx",
+      "clio_time_entries_2024.csv",
+      "client_matter_list.xlsx"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Schedules & Accruals",
+      "subcategory": "Flex",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 3.0,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_2284c61db4924a078ad18e0e5acae8c2",
+        "criteria": "States total FY2024 performance compensation is $227,257.06 (acceptable range $227,252.06 to $227,262.06)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_cabdc5b2ac294a379f961fff3463e2cc",
+        "criteria": "States net adjusting entry amount to true up Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200) is $29,257.06 (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_f2d513c634e9417fa15f694a581fc5da",
+        "criteria": "Proposes the journal entry for the partner compensation true-up as $29,257.06 Dr Partner Guaranteed Payments (or Account 6200), Cr Accrued Expenses (or Account 2050) (acceptable range $29,252.06 to $29,262.06)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "task_id": "task_b66225e0cce148509c5d4c9b4773e554",
+    "task_name": "World 9 Task 30",
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "prompt": "Calculate the FY2024 year-end accounts receivable aging exposure. For this task use the AR Aging workpaper; calculate the FY2024 accounts receivable exposure by aging bucket.\n\nPlease provide answers in console. Present exposure data in % and rounded to two decimals.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "expected_output": "message_in_console",
+    "gold_response": "Aging Bucket in days\t  --      Exposure in %\nCurrent\t                      --        72.80%\n1-30\t                              --        10.85%\n31-60 \t                          --         2.04%\n61-90 \t                          --         5.25%\n>90\t                              --         9.06%",
+    "task_input_files": [
+      "workpaper_ar_aging_2024_12_31.xlsx",
+      "qbo_closing_trial_balance_2024_12_31.xlsx"
+    ],
+    "metadata": {
+      "category": "Variance Analysis",
+      "subcategory": "AR Aging exposure analysis",
+      "output_type": "console_text",
+      "world_entity_type": "legal_services",
+      "estimated_completion_hours": 0.75,
+      "author_role": "expert",
+      "reviewer_role": "expert"
+    },
+    "rubric": [
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_7e889c8945924c8583433d493fc8e485",
+        "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket current is 72.80% (Acceptable value is 72.80%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_ccdedd76d1994b68943831b693321496",
+        "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 1-30 days is 10.85% (Acceptable value is 10.85%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_0b4ec5c259cc4bcbb3043ca9596fded4",
+        "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 31-60 days is 2.04% (Acceptable value is 2.04%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_e55ac0095f5140aa9967e87a54a397b9",
+        "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket 61-90 days is 5.25% (Acceptable value is 5.25%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      },
+      {
+        "verifier_id": "ver_4bdf2906d4914625b29f206743dc9380",
+        "criteria": "States the AR exposure for the Aging Bucket >90 days is 9.06% (Acceptable value is 9.06%)",
+        "criterion_type": "Reasoning (numerical)"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+]

world_descriptions.json

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+[
+  {
+    "world_id": "world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008",
+    "world_name": "World 9 - Sterling, Marsh & Associates LLP",
+    "world_description": "Philadelphia boutique law firm. Accounting-system exports (QBO journal entry register, AP bill ledger, chart of accounts, operating and IOLTA bank transactions, vendor master, Clio billing export) plus a shipped filesystem of workpapers, statements, registers and invoices.",
+    "domain": "Accounting",
+    "apps": [
+      "filesystem",
+      "spreadsheets",
+      "pdfs",
+      "code_execution"
+    ]
+  }
+]

world_files_zipped/world_0645ad7c997c415e8c43f8de7cee2008.zip

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:37ada67ae8b3a35f3cda870c2d393e572f610cf9b7a26106983eda2225fb78bf
+size 1624963