text stringlengths 0 1.96k |
|---|
"One main weakness of the paper is manifested here: I found the description of the bins, and how they are calculated, quite confusing" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Framing: there is a lot of work in collaborative / multi-agent dialogue models which you have missed see refs below to start" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The paper is well written, easy to follow, and everything has been explained quite well" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Paper was organized, figures clear and readable." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"3) Experiments Finally, the experimental results do not look very compelling , it seems to be overall worse than the baselines in the two image datasets and slightly better in the audio dataset, so it's unclear that this approach is superior" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The discussion mentions participants who felt the drawing were similar while the metric showed they were not" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Discussion/interpretation of the results: - Sufficient vs necessary: While the experimental design and results are both of very high quality , I am slightly confused about the interpretation of the results" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"pseudo-url] yet the presented method is benchmarked only against 3" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"In summary, it is not a bad paper , but the experimental results are not sufficient to conclude that much" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It is not convincing to claim that the clustering is correct since even a noise can be decoded into a normal image" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"However, the conclusions do not directly follow from the results, so should be made more precise" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Figure 5 is referenced in the main text after figure 6" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The different loss functions are all based on previously proposed approaches and exploited in this case for this dual background/foreground problem." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"A final addition that would have made this work more compelling would have been to more thoroughly explore e-prop for computations that unfold on timescales beyond those built-in to the neurons (e.g. membrane or adaptation timescales) and which instead rely on reverberating network activity" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"For larger scale domains, I fear this could become an important obstacle to effective model training" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Comprehensive data measurement and modelling pipeline" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Other than that, the different approaches tested all work well in different tasks" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Instead, you present vague of sharp drops and two modes but do not present rigorous definitions" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Even provided more computing resources, the proposed method is not faster than small batch training" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The authors also compare the annotation time between points, bounding boxes and full supervision, which really highlight the impact of their method (x10 speedup)" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The paper provides a broadly useful synthesis of key differences between ANN and SNN approaches" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Another, relatively small point which the authors glance over is the matter of efficient training" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Finally, the discussion would benefit from some more general discussion, before the limitations, on the overall findings and what they mean for mind mapping and similar applications moving forward" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The work is a basic proof-of-concept of results that may not do much to advance understanding since they are what one would expect to see (i.e. the antithesis of their thesis seems very unlikely)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"It doesn't provide any additional information to the data lines themselves, and it leads the reader to expect these indicate statistically significant comparisons" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Thirdly, from the discussion of the findings, quotes appear unpacked" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"While eligibility traces have received some attention in neuroscience their relevance to learning has not been thoroughly explored, so this paper makes a welcome contribution that fits well within the workshop goals" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"They show images of a single reconstruction but no quantification of reconstruction quality or comparison to previous methods" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Similarly, the proposed rejection sampling scheme of OCDVAE is not consistent with the theory of VAEs and it's a post-hoc tweak that is not theoretically expected to provide a pdf of data with lower KL divergence to the true data pdf" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"However, I noted that there are several typos throughout the text , and I recommend a thorough editing pass for the camera ready" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Section 2.3 should make the differences (if any) with Tang et al. explicit" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"1- This paper is well written and the message is clear to the reader" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Authors do not visualize the attention (as is common in previous work involving attention in e.g., NLP)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"While not in conflict with this work, it does closely relate and discuss many of the same issues discussed in this work, so relating them would be fruitful" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"3) more details about the convGRU may be useful, for example its architecture." "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Moreover, is there is a reason you did not validate on all TUPAC16 tasks The is well written paper with a clear description of the state of the art and the reasoning behind the presented method" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"This will potentially bring us closer to rapid evaluation of lesions during surgical operation using fast CM" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"6- I suggest the authors to use train validation and test split or a cross-validation, since the results presented here are from a validation set without a test set" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Why do the authors reuse the input of a temporal block to its output and how does this influence the performance" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It is not clear whether such assumptions hold for practical problems" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"after rebuttal ==================== I appreciate the authors' response, but I do not think the rebuttal addressed my concerns" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"For example, many of the interactions between myriad excitatory and inhibitory types across brains regions and neuromodulators, of which dopamine is just one of several, is largely unknown" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"This should also include some discussion on why this metric allows judging sufficiency and disentangledness" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The work has promising implications for computational psychiatry , but probably not for RL at this point" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The novelty of the proposed framework is to take the label structure into account and to learn label dependencies, based on the idea of conditional learning in (Chen et al., 2019) and the lung disease hierarchy of the CheXpert dataset (Irvin and al., 2019)." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"So I think the present work needs to be repitched slightly as solving credit assignment in an online/few shot learning setting" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The main ideas and claims are clearly expressed" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The level of detail in the algorithm description is a particular strength, giving a clear picture of how it works and why those choices were made" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"What are the design choices" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"2- It is not clear why the histology images were used for denoising network training" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"2) Theoretical inconsistencies Although the system might work overall, two things seem to be technically incorrect : - The decoder and classifier are expected to approximate the distribution of training data according to the authors (for valid generative replay)." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Even though it is mentioned by the authors that these images resemble to noisy RCM, this should be either referenced or shown" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"With respect to Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM), I would prefer to see quantitative comparisons against published results" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"This should also be shown in table 2" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Good and convincing results when compared to competing methods * Strong validation * It is a shame that the Kaplan-Meier estimator was not repeated for all baselines to further illustrate the strength of the multi-task features * There are many more TUPAC16 results [pseudo-url." "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Section 3.3 is confusing to me" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"There are some possibilities, which have not been explored : 1) the performance improvement derives from the approximation induced by the representation of float or double in the matrices." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Similarly, what is the nature of the different action spaces" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Does their model outperform a model which has global communication with IR" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Experimental setup: - One somewhat concerning (but perhaps unavoidable) thing about the experimental setup is that all the considered datasets are not perfectly linearly separable , i.e. the Bayes-optimal classifier has non-zero test error in expectation, and moreover the data variance is full-rank in the embedded space." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Unless a comparison can be made with the same amounts of experience, I don't see how Figure 2 can be interpreted objectively" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"To which extent the system supports other patterns" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The paper does discuss limitations , but I think that this section should also address the fact that the study was largely preliminary / exploratory in nature ; there was no comparison condition, nor a discussion of what a baseline condition might look like for this context" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"What is unique about the MRF formalism that -- for practical applications -- could not be effectively captured in a directed graphical model" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Thus, the novelty is incremental" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"That, in turn, makes it quite difficult to understand the counter-argument developed in this paper---and especially since ""The evidence comes from a study by Bi et al ."" (p. 4), which makes one wonder why Bi et al. put that ""limitation"" up in the first place" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The authors do not compare the inference speed of the proposed method with others" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Use of the same spatial transformer model with an interchangeable bank of input features is elegant" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Are there other patters with features not presented in these three" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"A short discussion of other training algorithms (such as surrogate gradient or surrogate loss methods) and why the given one was chosen instead would have been helpful" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Can we prove that at least visually" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The gain using CGAN MRI looks marginal, which would be better to apply ablation study ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"IN fact, the whole way the user draws the shape is poorly described" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I can't get how exactly normalizing flows + TRPO works" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"While the experiments show the value of hierarchy , they do not show the value of this particular method of creating hierarchy" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The results are also very nice" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The method in [2] should be included in the comparison of vessel segmentation algorithms" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The domains considered for experimental evaluation are particularly simple" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The paper is fairly well written and structured, and it seems technically sound" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The paper is written clearly" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"In addition, images representing eliminated nuclei using noisy RCM images should be presented with their counterpart using despeckling network" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Mainly an incremental paper, proposing a combination of well established GAN-based networks to accomplish a classification task" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I actually dont understand the purpose of this paragraph" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Perhaps compare to reference models [11] or [10] rather than a 'vanilla' RNN , as this amounts to not using any prior information about the task (which, by construction, we 'know' is useful)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"RELATED WORK The related work is well balanced with a review on visualization dashboards and visualization in medical training with references from diverse related research communities" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Cons: However, there are several issues that should be addressed including the presentation of the paper : The algorithm seeks to combine A* search with MCTS (combined with policy and value networks), and is shown to outperform the baseline MCTS method." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The system does not seem to follow a particular rationale" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It is well-written, well-structured and easy to read for someone without knowledge on IVF and ART" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"How representative is it , whats the bigger picture , can it be generalised to other not known scenarios" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"However, in its present form, it is hard to understand why the claim is correct" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"No trouble understanding the material or writing By focusing on the more biologically plausible ""feedback alignment"" networks, the paper does sit at the intersection of neuro and AI" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"If you dont use it, remove it from the section" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"In fact, the model presented in the paper has a major obscure point" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I neither understand ""As the accuracy curve is also monotone decreasing with increasing regularization we will also detect the convexity by a steep drop in accuracy as depicted by the marked point in the Figure 1(b)"" nor do I understand ""accuracy over regularization curve (plotted in log-log space) is constant ""?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The two improvements in section 3.2 seem quite low level and are only applicable to this particular approach to hierarchical RL" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"A similar problem occurred with a critical aspect of the brushing technique : direction." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Did you train on some other dataset and test on skin lesion dataset" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The importance is tempered by the findings only covering what is to be expected, and not pushing beyond this or describing a path to push beyond this" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"That said, it does seems like a fairly creative combination of existing approaches" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Also, entering PIN on touchscreen devices is notoriously difficult for people who are visually impaired, so it is no wonder that BendyPass outperforms it" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.