Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"The improvement on test errors does not look significant" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Regarding the theoretical part, I still do not follow the authors' explanation" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I think it could at least be improved for clarity ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Please provide variance measures on your results (within model configuration, across scene examples)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Depending on those variance numbers you might also consider doing a statistical test to argue that the auxiliary loss function and and RL fine-tuning offer certain improvement over the Scene2seq base model" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Because of that, the experimental evaluation remains vague as well, as the criteria are tested on one data set by visual inspection" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The experiments also talk about 2D bandit problem, and again, without any descriptions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"BTW, in the Section 4.3, what does [-1, 1]^2 mean" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It seems that the authors only use the basic normalizing flow structures studied in Rezende&Mohamed (2015) and Dinh et al (2016)" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Some minor issues: Figure 2 is not referenced anywhere in the main text" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Minor things: + The main idea is described too sketchily" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Notably, these together with the ability to train the components separately will generally increase the efficiency of learning" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"How different are the familiar and unfamiliar instructions" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I wouldn't consider the results reported in Section 4.5 to be ablative studies" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The paper incorrectly references Mei et al. 2016 when stating that methods require a large amount of human supervision (data annotation) and/or linguistic knowledge." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"This is not a sound mechanism to achieve an as-faithful-as-possible (limited by the expressiveness of the encoder-decoder architectures) approximation to the training data" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I.e., there are two different probabilistic models modeling the same data in inconsistent ways and one or the other is used depending on the part of the system" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, this paper is a very promising step in studying adversarial robustness , but concerns about discussion of prior work, discussion of experimental setup, and conclusions drawn, currently bar me from recommending acceptance" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"For example, in line 8 of Algorithm 2, why only the top 3 child nodes are added to the queue" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"For example, in Eq (1) what are the dimensions K and V" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Under such circumstances, it is quite impossible to reproduce experiments ." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"As I understand it, real improvements in predicting clinical variables has not been shown to be reproducible so this would be a significant claim of this paper" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I note that I am aware of the theoretical representation differences between directed and undirected models, I am wondering how these differences actually matter in practical applications at scale" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I would like to see this curve extended until we start to see signs of overfitting" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"I would also like to see a comparison to CD-k, which often outperforms PCD-k" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Table 3 (text classification result) does not list baselines" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"While this paper has some interesting experiments" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"In comparison to past frameworks, the approach of this paper seems less theoretically motivated" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"The writers have put their contributions in context well and the presentation of the paper itself is very clear" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The paper is well written , tghe major issue of this paper is the lack of comparison with other previous methods" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Therefore, the efficacy of the proposed model can not be well demontrated" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"A way to improve the paper would be to make it clear from the beginning that these results are about Dyna-style algorithms in the Atari domain ." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Moreover, the proposed approach is extremely simple and it is well explained in Section 2 with equations (1) and (2)." "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"But the novelty is limited" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"However, it is the first time that it is applied for complementing data sets and have some interesting modifications that certainly ensures novelty in the proposal" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The paper is well written and describes an interesting and relatively novel approach to solving multi-class classification in a clinical domain where overlap between classes is frequently a possibility" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Is using a pre-trained network really helping ?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The entire workflow is quite clear and complete" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"The paper is not well organized" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"It is necessary to prove that the generated images retain their important diagnostic value" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"2- Two step approach combining despeckling and generative networks are reasonable for the task" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"3- Please provide an evidence to support the positive effect of choosing an augmentation of size 512x512 after 50 epochs in Section 3.2." "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"For example, it is not clear what are the non-desirable artifacts, where are the eliminated nuclei and why the network has a harder time to learn" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Are the results on the entire parametric maps in line with the current results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"7- What is the number of parameters required for each method in Table 1?" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"c- Quantitative results can be mentioned in the abstract ." "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Minor: - Testing for statistical significance is only shown in the appendix" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"Overall, the quality of the paper is fair" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality"
"Plenty of works combine autoencoders with LSTMs" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"
"This holds for all the popular performance measures" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality"