text stringlengths 0 1.96k |
|---|
"I believe the experiments are thorough and well designed to back the claims of the paper" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The utilized network architecture can be better explained with an emphasis on specific design choices" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"1- This paper is well written and the message is clear to the reader" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"2- The extensive tests on a real dataset instead of phantom cases is definitely a strength of the paper" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"How does the temporal and spatial blocks work" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Even though the authors explain the details in the text I believe an additional illustration in each block (maybe in Appendix) might be helpful to reproduce the method in the paper for further research" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'c... |
"4- How does the specifics of the network architecture influence the performance" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Why do the authors reuse the input of a temporal block to its output and how does this influence the performance" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"5- How is the complex component of the signal concatenated into a channel ?" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Does the order of concatenation influence the results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Did the authors considered to utilize complex valued networks for this task" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"6- The quantitative results are yielded using multiple segmentation masks due to MR physics related concerns" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Are the results on the entire parametric maps in line with the current results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"7- What is the number of parameters required for each method in Table 1?" "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"However, no quantitative comparisons are provided" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I believe the computational time can be added for each method in Table 1." "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"c- Quantitative results can be mentioned in the abstract ." "['non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The paper is written clearly" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Methods, materials and validation are of a sufficient quality" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"There are certain original aspects in this work (latent en-/decoding, inception-based decoder network, latent space interpolation, generalization to previously unseen shapes etc.), but the work may not be as original as authors suggest, since they may not be aware of a very similar work (see Cons), where some of the d... |
"I would recommend weakening or at least toning down certain ""marketing"" claims like ""3 times finer than the highest resolution ever investigated in the domain of voxel-based shape generation"", or ""the finest resolution ever achieved among voxel-based models in computer graphics""." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', '... |
"First, it is not fully clear where this number 3 comes from , and second, the quality of the work speaks for itself" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"However, I am aware of at least one work where such concepts have been proposed and explored already" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Compared to the proposed work, where latents represent clinically relevant mandible landmarks, an auto-encoder approach as in ACNN is more general: relevant landmarks as in the mandible cannot be identified for arbitrary anatomies , and a separate training of decoder and decoder as proposed here crucially depends on a... |
"How do authors suggest to apply their approach to anatomies where it is impossible (in terms of feasibility and manual effort) to place a sufficiently large number of unique landmarks on the anatomy (e.g. smooth shapes, such as left ventricle in ACNN)?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', ... |
"Transfer learning and dealing with small datasets is an important area of research - The paper proposes a novel method, enabling pretraining on several different tasks instead of only one dataset (e.g. ImageNet) like done most of the times - Results show clear performance increase on small datasets - Proper experiment... |
"Only compared to IMM which is very similar to the proposed T-IMM" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Comparison to (unsupervised) domain adaptation methods would also have been interesting (e.g. gradient reversal (Ganin et al. 2014, Kamnitsas et al. 2016))." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non'... |
"Method only evaluated on one dataset (BRATS)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Minor: - Testing for statistical significance is only shown in the appendix" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It shows that for ""100%"" T-IMM actually is not significantly better than most of the other initialization strategies" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"This should also be shown in table 2" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The way table 2 is presented at the moment it seems like T-IMM is better than all methods also for ""100%""" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"But the higher performance is not significant" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I guess this should actually be table 4" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Figure 1 could have been a bit more clear" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It is well-written, well-structured and easy to read for someone without knowledge on IVF and ART" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Plenty of works combine autoencoders with LSTMs" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I suggest you either argue for the novelty or remove the claim from the paper" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The methods section lacks details for reproducing the work" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"These must be provided in a supplement to allow reproducability" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"If you want your work applied in clinics, this is much more important than improving the results" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"If you dont use it, remove it from the section" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"If you do use it, you cannot argue that you learn from ""a small number of labeled samples"" as done in the final paragraph of the paper" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con... |
"In the discussion you almost exclusively focus on the work by Tran et al and why comparing with that work is unfair" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Instead, you should have made the comparison and highlighted the differences clearly" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I am not convinced" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It is not obvious how to best get around this issue, since the first embryologist screening probably has false negatives, but you need to take it into account" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'co... |
"This holds for all the popular performance measures" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Regardless, trying to paint others work negatively by arguments to some general issue with established performance metrics is disingenuous" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.