Datasets:
mfromm
/
AMSR

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
text
stringlengths
0
1.96k
"It is necessary to provide more qualitative information regarding the staining results in addition to confirmation from two expert pathologists" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Please provide results of the inter-rater reliability of two pathologists using a point scale on the quality of image digital staining" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"2- The extensive tests on a real dataset instead of phantom cases is definitely a strength of the paper" "['non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"5- How is the complex component of the signal concatenated into a channel ?" "['non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The reason for high performance of the proposed method can be explained with the required number of parameters to train the method." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"However, no quantitative comparisons are provided" "['non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Minor suggestions a- Some recent work on using the complex-valued neural networks (Virtue Patrick et al., arxiv), geometry of deep learning (Golbabaee et al., arxiv)and recurrent neural networks (Oksuz et al.,arxiv) for MRF dictionary matching can be mentioned in the literature review with their strengths and weakneses." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"term in Fig.2." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Summary: Authors present AnatomyGen, a CNN-based approach for mapping from low-dimensional anatomical landmark coordinates to a dense voxel representation and back, via separately trained decoder and encoder networks." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The paper is written clearly" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"In contrast, ACNN auto-encoders train their encoder and decoder in conjunction." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"How do authors suggest to apply their approach to anatomies where it is impossible (in terms of feasibility and manual effort) to place a sufficiently large number of unique landmarks on the anatomy (e.g. smooth shapes, such as left ventricle in ACNN)?" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Method only evaluated on one dataset (BRATS)." "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Often new methods are manually ""overfitted"" to one dataset." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"When used on another dataset they do not show gains anymore." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"How is training till ""convergence"" (section 4.3) defined?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Not 100% clear if the IMM method used in the experiments is the method described in section 3.2 (alpha=1/T) ?" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The method is compared to five embryologists and results clearly shows that learning directly from the clinical outcome outperfoms embryologists by a large margin" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"The main weakness of the paper is in the methods section" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"The methods section lacks details for reproducing the work" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"As I read it, UBar is the same LSTM just trained on clinical outcomes." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"If you dont use it, remove it from the section" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"In your case, you train on data that has already been filtered to only include positive decisions by embryologists, otherwise the eggs would not have been implanted." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"It is not obvious how to best get around this issue, since the first embryologist screening probably has false negatives, but you need to take it into account" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Your statement about AUCs and training sizes is either obviously correct or obviously wrong, depending on interpretation." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The only way training size can influence AUC is by influencing the training of the model." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"This holds for all the popular performance measures" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Maybe you meant the size of the test set?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"A mior nitpick: You define all abbreviations except for UBar" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"I am aware of the page limitation, so maybe MIDL should allow an extra page solely for an image of the raw data." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The experiments are clearly explained and the results are well presented." "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Multi-task learning can extract a shared representation that is generalisable and this is evidenced in the results in the TUPAC16 set." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The work also raises some interesting points regarding multi-task training for pathology and with further work could be a good paper" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"This paper proposes to add a self-expressiveness regularization term to learn a union of subspaces for image-to-image translation in medical domain." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"This will provide more insights or explanations." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"If a sonographer is able to acquire these images, they are also able to perform these measurements" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"The boxplot shows that six outliers are resolved by the AF-Net, so it can be debated if that is clinically relevant to reduce (6/435=)1.4% of the errors" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"It is an interesting idea and the quality is overall rather good for an abstract paper" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Some points to address are listed in the following: The early stopping is not clear" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Can you comment?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The idea of learning convolution weights for different input image quality is novel" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"In Table 3., the result of the proposed method is slightly higher than the CSM." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Therefore I recommend the weak accept." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Overall, the problem the paper tackles is critical, and the proposed network component is effective to some extent" "['non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Other specific suggestions: Section 2: region of interest (ROI) performing motions does not make sense to me" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"Section 3: combing should be combining" "['arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"However, I have following concerns: 1." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"Also, I would be convinced that the variance would increase for out of distribution test samples because you used a prior that enforced uncertainty of all labels" "['non', 'non', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg', 'arg']" "paper quality"
"The main contribution of the work was adding a normalization step to the network, and learning the affine transformation parameters during the training." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"
"The results of the model was compared also to the state of the art.From the following sentence, I understand that for each pathology, a different model was trained." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality"