image
imagewidth (px) 374
1.46k
|
|---|
π Student Performance Factors β EDA & Insights
Michael Ozon β Assignment #1 (EDA & Dataset) Reichman University β Data Science Course
π₯ Presentation Video
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cAXLzcZflMgv12EDlVTeQoKxzVumOjbd?usp=drive_link
π Project Overview
This project explores the Student Performance Factors dataset, containing 6,607 student records and 20 academic, behavioral, lifestyle, and demographic features.
The goal of this Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) is to understand which factors most strongly influence studentsβ final exam scores (Exam_Score) and to extract clear, data-driven insights.
In this project I performed:
Data loading & validation
Data cleaning (missing values, duplicates)
Outlier inspection
Descriptive statistics
Correlation analysis
Multiple visualizations
Clear conclusions and interpretation
π Dataset Description
Source: Kaggle Rows: 6,607 Columns: 20 Target Variable: Exam_Score (continuous)
Feature Categories
Study-related: Hours_Studied, Attendance, Previous_Scores
Lifestyle: Sleep_Hours, Physical_Activity
Family: Family_Income, Parental_Education_Level
School environment: Teacher_Quality, School_Type
Personal: Gender, Motivation_Level, Internet_Access
Dataset Info
Missing Values
π§Ό Part 1 β Data Cleaning
β Missing Values
Three columns contained a small number of missing values:
Column Missing Teacher_Quality 78 Parental_Education_Level 90 Distance_from_Home 67
Action: Filled using mode() (most frequent category). Reason: Missingness was < 1.5% and all three variables are categorical.
β Duplicate Rows df.duplicated().sum()
Result: No duplicate rows found.
β Outlier Inspection
Outliers were inspected using boxplots. Some extreme values appeared in:
Hours_Studied
Tutoring_Sessions
Physical_Activity
However, all values were reasonable and consistent with realistic variation. No rows were removed.
π Part 2 β EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis)
π Descriptive Statistics
1οΈβ£ Attendance β Exam Performance

Insight: Attendance has the strongest connection to exam performance. Students with higher attendance consistently achieve higher scores. Correlation: 0.58
2οΈβ£ Hours Studied β Exam Performance

Insight: Clear positive relationship β more study hours lead to higher exam scores. Correlation: 0.45
3οΈβ£ Previous Scores β Exam Performance

Insight: Weak positive relationship. Previous academic performance contributes slightly but does not strongly predict the final exam score. Correlation: 0.18
4οΈβ£ Tutoring Sessions

Insight: Students with more tutoring sessions show slightly higher scores, but the effect is small. Correlation: 0.16
5οΈβ£ Gender Differences

Insight: Performance is nearly identical for males and females. Correlation: ~0
6οΈβ£ Sleep Hours

Insight: No meaningful relationship between sleep duration and exam score. Correlation: β0.017
7οΈβ£ Physical Activity

Insight: No significant relationship. Correlation: 0.03
8οΈβ£ Family Income

Insight: Students from Medium and High-income families have slightly higher median scores, but the effect is small and distributions heavily overlap.
π₯ Correlation Heatmap (Numerical Features)
Key Predictors
Attendance β 0.58
Hours_Studied β 0.45
Weak Predictors
Previous_Scores (0.18)
Tutoring (0.16)
No Influence
Gender
Sleep_Hours
Physical_Activity
π§ Final Insights & Conclusions π― Strongest Factors Influencing Exam Performance
Class Attendance
Hours Studied
These two behavioral variables directly linked to study habits have the strongest predictive power.
π― Weak or No Influence
Sleep hours
Physical activity
Previous scores
Gender
Tutoring (minor effect)
Family income (minor effect)
π§© Interpretation
The analysis suggests that academic engagement β especially consistent attendance and dedicated study time β is the primary driver of student success.
Lifestyle, demographic, and background factors play a much smaller role compared to active learning behaviors.
- Downloads last month
- 23