conversation_id int64 1 206k | help_channel stringlengths 6 7 | __rowid__ stringlengths 32 32 | author_id int64 62,061,868B 1,071,443,446B | author_name stringlengths 2 32 | timestamp stringlengths 19 19 | content stringlengths 0 3.97k | reference.messageId stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId stringclasses 1
value | url stringlengths 0 591 | fileName stringlengths 0 513 | student int64 0 1 | helper int64 0 1 | references.id float64 62,061,868B 1,071,056,124B ⌀ | references.name stringlengths 2 32 ⌀ | references.discriminator stringlengths 4 4 ⌀ | references.nickname stringlengths 1 32 ⌀ | references.isBot bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:32:46 | **Camilleone** | 569167697925898261.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:33:28 | Oh, right. So then P(n+1) is If $b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)$, then $b_1!\dots b_m! \leq (n+1)!$? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:33:30 | **beeswax** | 709959727098101810.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:33:42 | yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:34:55 | Wait, so then my inductive hypothesis is only $$b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)!$$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:34:57 | **beeswax** | 709959727098101810.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:37:02 | your inductive hypothesis is P(n) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:37:15 | that is: If $b_1 + ... + b_m \leq n$, then $b_1! \cdots b_m! \leq n!$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:37:18 | **Camilleone** | 569167697925898261.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:37:28 | this is your inductive hypothesis | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:38:04 | now you need to prove: if $b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)$, then $b_1! \dots b_m! \leq (n+1)!$ | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:38:06 | **Camilleone** | 569167697925898261.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:39:07 | Oh, so this is good so far then | image.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:39:29 | i would find some issue with the first line's second half tbh | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:39:47 | first green line i mean | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:40:21 | and i have no idea where you learned the phrasing of the last two lines, but that is _not_ how you write induction | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:40:30 | Oh yeah, I'll delete that right hand side of the "and" | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:40:46 | isn't that what you want to show? why are you assuming it? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:41:54 | I thought that was our inductive hypothesis? | 0 | 1 | 331,558,346,333,224,960 | jan Niku | 2119 | jan Niku | false | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:42:24 | We use P(n) to prove P(n+1)? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:43:19 | do you want to read those lines again | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:43:28 | this is what we want to do | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:43:39 | the inductive hypothesis is only P(n) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:43:59 | which means the only assumption is P(n) _for some n_, and we want to use this to show P(n+1) is true | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:44:08 | we cannot just assume P(n) is true for all n | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:45:10 | So, it was just an issue with the "for all" part? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:47:24 | yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:47:34 | for all and for some are two very different things | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:51:12 | Oh, okay. So, are we pretty much just using $n \leq (n+1)$ and $n! \leq (n+1)!$ here? | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/30/2022 22:51:15 | **beeswax** | 709959727098101810.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | ||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 22:51:20 | In the inductive case I mean | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:51:40 | maybe you should try the induction first | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 22:51:42 | see what happens | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 23:03:49 | Mkay, so I did this and I'm not quite sure what I have at my disposal to get that what I have implies that factorial product inequality for (n+1)! | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 23:03:54 | image.png | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/30/2022 23:13:03 | There's no time limit for these help channels, right? I'm just going to get some food real quick | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:20:25 | Well, there's a sort of time limit that's dependent on when the bot asks you if the question is resolved | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:20:31 | Otherwise no | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:21:06 | About the latest picture: you don't need to say m is fixed again | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:21:16 | Cause you fixed it at the start | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:22:12 | You should begin by letting b_1,...,b_m be positive integers such that b_1 + ... + b_m \leq n+1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:22:37 | And then now consider the product of the factorials | 0 | 1 | 214,305,946,090,995,700 | Dzoni | 0850 | Dzoni | false | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 569,167,697,925,898,240 | Camilleone | 01/30/2022 23:22:43 | ^ continue from there | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,788 | help-1 | b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4 | 709,959,727,098,101,800 | beeswax | 01/31/2022 00:13:07 | Ah, I think I might see where it’s going. | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:17:14 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:17:56 | u sub | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:18:04 | yeah im just stuck rn | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:18:10 | let me know if this is right so far | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:18:47 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:19:01 | good so far | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:19:18 | now i dont know what to multiply to get 1/2radicalx | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:21:14 | idk what you mean | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:21:24 | just multiply both sides by 2 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:21:35 | to get 2du = 1/sqrt(x) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:22:54 | im still confused | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:23:18 | what’s confusing you | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:23:50 | what would 2du help me with | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:24:42 | it would tell you what 1/sqrt(x) is equal to | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:24:48 | so you can sub it back into the integral | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:24:53 | this is how u sub works | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:25:03 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:25:27 | yes but would i not need to get something on the outside like this problem? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:25:31 | the 1/3 | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:25:42 | that works too | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:26:09 | would you mind running me through it and then explaining it? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:27:26 | sure | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:27:34 | so you already have the u sub | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:27:53 | du = 1/(2sqrt(x)) dx | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:28:06 | 2du = 1/sqrt(x) dx | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:28:11 | u = sqrt(x) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:28:25 | so we can just sub this back into the original integral to get | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:28:36 | 2sin(u) du | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:29:16 | and then i just derive from there right? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:29:59 | integrate but yes | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:30:23 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:30:36 | thats it right | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:30:37 | yeah | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:31:06 | ,w d/dx (-2cos(sqrt(x))) | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 510,789,298,321,096,700 | TeXit | 01/31/2022 01:31:11 | Results provided by WolframAlpha | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:31:12 | just to check | 0 | 1 | 214,305,946,090,995,700 | Dzoni | 0850 | Dzoni | false | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:32:22 | can i run you by some more problems? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:32:47 | sure | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:33:49 | unknown.png | 1 | 0 | 183,668,144,404,037,630 | Ann | 0413 | Ann | false | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:33:55 | i know i prolly already messed up | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:34:19 | is u sqrt(1-x) | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:34:30 | you didn’t exactly mess up | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:34:38 | but you should solve for x in terms of u | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:35:00 | so you can avoid integration by parts | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 652,336,711,325,712,400 | quantum | 01/31/2022 01:35:07 | even though it’s not that bad anyways | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:37:00 | does this look right? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 01:38:54 | i already think i forgot something but i dont know how i would go about doing it | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 02:03:23 | @Helpers | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,789 | help-1 | 7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c | 456,226,577,798,135,800 | Deleted User | 01/31/2022 02:14:31 | .close | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 898,441,976,142,237,800 | Hyperlix | 01/31/2022 02:19:09 | how do you graph x + y = 7? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 353,366,222,450,065,400 | TheWhiteShadow | 01/31/2022 02:23:12 | it's an equation with a y-int of 7 and a gradient of -1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 898,441,976,142,237,800 | Hyperlix | 01/31/2022 02:23:47 | how did you get the gradient? | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 929,724,109,011,681,300 | RDT | 01/31/2022 02:24:13 | take x=0 , u get y=7
take y=0 , u get x=7
so line passes through 0,7 and 7,0
connect the points u get a line | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 898,441,976,142,237,800 | Hyperlix | 01/31/2022 02:24:52 | ahhh | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 898,441,976,142,237,800 | Hyperlix | 01/31/2022 02:24:57 | ok | 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null | |||||
205,790 | help-1 | 09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4 | 353,366,222,450,065,400 | TheWhiteShadow | 01/31/2022 02:25:18 | cuz x is multiplied by -1 | 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.