Hugging Face's logo

Datasets:
minhpvo
/
ocr-output_glm_ocr

Modalities:
Image
Text
Formats:
parquet
Size:
< 1K
Tags:
ocr
document-processing
glm-ocr
markdown
uv-script
generated
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
Polars
Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
image
imagewidth (px)
2.55k
14k
filename
stringlengths
7
7
markdown
stringlengths
115
5.69k
inference_info
stringclasses
1 value
001.jpg
These drawings are intended to provide an example for individuals preparing drawings for permit submittal. While every construction project is unique, the basic information a city needs in order to determine whether or not a project complies with codes and ordinances does not change. The following basic information should be provided with permit submittals: - Site plan - Elevations - Foundation Plans - Framing Plans - Floor Plans - Details Submitting accurate, scaled drawings containing adequate information and appropriate details for your project will help the permitting process go much smoother from start to finish. VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (PROPERTY) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: X-X-X LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED STRUCTURES HOUSE FOOTPRINT GARAGE FOOTPRINT PAVEMENT TOTAL LOT AREA LOT COVERAGE = TOTAL + LOT AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO EXISTING HOUSE XXX SF ADDITION LOWER FLOOR + XXX SF ADDITION UPPER FLOOR + XXX SF EXISTING GARAGE + XXX SF = A LOT AREA = B FLOOR AREA RATIO = A + B AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION = (MIDPT ELEV x LENGTH OF WALL SEGMENT) + (MIDPT x LENGTH) ... LENGTH + LENGTH ... GENERAL NOTES PROJECT TEAM OWNER: NAME/COMPANY STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE 98XXX PH: XXX-XXXX-XXXX CONTACT: NAME CONTRACTOR: NAME/COMPANY ADDRESS CITY, STATE 98XXX PH: XXX-XXXX-XXXX CONTACT: NAME CONTRACTOR LIC. # UBI # (MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36")
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
002.jpg
FOUNDATION & LOWER FLOOR FRAMING PLAN (SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" OR 1/8" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) SLAB ON GRADE NOTE REINFORCING SIZE, SPACING, & EMBEDMENT OF ANCHOR BOLTS TYP. MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
003.jpg
SEAL: Sample House Street Address City, ST Zip DATE: Month Day, Year SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER: A3 (MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36")
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
004.jpg
LOWER ROOF & UPPER FLOOR FRAMING PLAN (SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" OR 1/8" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) (MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36")
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
005.jpg
SEAL: Sample House Street Address City, ST Zip DATE: Month Day, Year SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A5 $\textcircled{1}$ SOUTH ELEVATION (SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" OR 1/8" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) $\textcircled{2}$ EAST ELEVATION (SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" OR 1/8" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) $\textcircled{3}$ NORTH ELEVATION (MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36")
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
006.jpg
GLAZING AREA % OF FLOOR VERTICAL OVERHEAD DOOR U-FACTOR CEILING VAULTED CEILING WALL ABOVE GRADE WALL INTERIOR BELOW GRADE WALL EXTERIOR BELOW GRADE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE ## % ## ## R-### R-### R-### N/A N/A R-### R-### ROOF FINISH ROOF CONSTRUCTION TYPE ROOF PITCH INSULATION R VALUE & THICKNESS VAPOR BARRIER EXISTING ROOF RIDGE INTERIOR WALL FINISH WALL CONSTRUCTION TYPE INSULATION R VALUE & THICKNESS VAPOR BARRIER SHEATHING TYPE JOIST SIZE & TYPE TOP PLATE CONSTRUCTION ANCHOR BOLT SIZE & TYPE FOUNDATION: DIMENSIONS, REBAR SIZE & LOCATION FOOTING DRAIN EAST-WEST SECTION 0 1 2 5 (SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) NORTH-SOUTH SECTION 0 1 2 5 (SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" PREFERRED) Sample House Street Address City, ST Zip DATE: Month Day, Year SHEET TITLE: SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER: A6
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
007.jpg
1. SLAB ON GRADE 2. FOUNDATION DETAIL 3. GARAGE SLAB/WALL (ALTERNATE) 4. FLOOR-WALL CONNECTION 5. ROOF-WALL CONNECTION 6. POST-BASE CONNECTION 7. STAIR DETAIL 8. POST-BEAM CONNECTION 9. FACTORY-BUILT FIREPLACE 10. ROOF TRUSS-WALL CONNECTION 11. 16" MINIMUM LATERAL RESTRAINT PANEL 12. 24" MINIMUM LATERAL RESTRAINT PANEL Sample House Street Address City, ST Zip DATE: Month Day, Year SHEET TITLE: DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: A7
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
008.jpg
These drawings are intended to provide an example for individuals preparing drawings for permit submittal. While every construction project is unique, the basic information a city needs in order to determine whether or not a project complies with codes and ordinances does not change. The following basic information should be provided with permit submittals: - Site plan - Elevations - Foundation Plans - Framing Plans - Floor Plans - Details Submitting accurate, scaled drawings containing adequate information and appropriate details for your project will help the permitting process go much smoother from start to finish. VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (PROPERTY) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: X-X-X LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED STRUCTURES HOUSE FOOTPRINT GARAGE FOOTPRINT PAVEMENT TOTAL LOT AREA LOT COVERAGE = TOTAL + LOT AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO EXISTING HOUSE XXX SF ADDITION LOWER FLOOR + XXX SF ADDITION UPPER FLOOR + XXX SF EXISTING GARAGE + XXX SF = A LOT AREA = B FLOOR AREA RATIO = A + B AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION = (MIDPT ELEV x LENGTH OF WALL SEGMENT) + (MIDPT x LENGTH) ... LENGTH + LENGTH ... GENERAL NOTES PROJECT TEAM OWNER: NAME/COMPANY STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE 98XXX PH: XXX-XXXX-XXXX CONTACT: NAME CONTRACTOR: NAME/COMPANY ADDRESS CITY, STATE 98XXX PH: XXX-XXXX-XXXX CONTACT: NAME CONTRACTOR LIC. # UBI # (MAX SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36")
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
009.png
REFERENCES: 1. FOR DETAILS OF PSC SLAB REFER DRG No. RD50/B-10277 (POST TENSIONED). 2. FOR DETAILS OF WEEP HOLE AND BACK FILING REFER DRG No. GM/WIS/CB/R/RC/SCD/TD/156/2020. 3. DETAILS OF ARRANGEMENT FOR FOOTPATH FOR h' type REFER DRG No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 4. WORKING LANE / SECTION REFER DRAWING No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 5. FOR DETAILS OF DROP / CURTAIN / TOE WALL REFER PC'S LETTER No. 71/PR/BRIDGE POLICY, DATED 10/11/12.2015. 6. FOR DETAILS OF DROP / CURTAIN / TOE WALL REFER PC'S LETTER No. 71/PR/BRIDGE POLICY, DATED 10/11/12.2015. 7. WORKING LANE / SECTION REFER DRAWING No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 8. FOR DETAILS OF ULINDAKONDA STATION REFER DRG No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 9. DETAILS OF RCC SLAB AS PER DESIGN. MODUS OPERANDI: 1. ANIMAL MOVEMENT FOR CASTING OF PRECAST PSC SLAB UNITS, RCC SLABS, BALLAST RETainer, Footprint, ITC, C.C., MADE BEAR BY THE BRIDGE LOCATION WELL IN ADVANCE. NECESSARY LIFTING CRANES OF SUITABLE CAPACITY ARE KEPT READ IN WORK CONDITION IN EQUIVALENT CAPACITY ARE IN WORK CASE OF EMERGENCY AND AS PER Necessity. 2. FOR THE EXISTING BRIDE REFER COMPLETION DRAWING No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 3. FOR THE EXISTING BRIDE REFER COMPLETION DRAWING No.: CAO/C/CR/T/RC/SCD/TD/98 (COMP). 4. BETWEEN MOVEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDE ABUTMENTS, PIERS, WING AND RETURN WALL CONNECTION WALL ETC., TO THE REQUIRED PROFILE AND DEPTH AS PER DESIGN DULY PROTECTING THE FOUNDATION AND SUBSTRUCTURE ON THE EXISTING LINE. 5. CAST IN STU FOUNDATION, SUB STRUCTURE ETC., AS PER APPROVED DRAWING DULY. 6. AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATION, SUB STRUCTURE ETC., THE PCS SLAB UNITS, BALLAST RETainer and FOOTPATH WILL SHIFTED TO BRIDGE APPROACHES BY SUITABLE MEANS FOR LAYING. 7. PCS SLAB UNITS, BALLAST RETainer and FOOTPATH WILL BE ALUMINIZED IN POSITION BY USING SUITABLE CAPACITY CRANES AND PLACED IN POSITION AS PER APPROVED LAYING SCHEME. 8. WEARING COAT TPC, WILL BE PROVIDED IN HATER LAUNCHING THE SLAB IN POSITION AND LAYING THE PROPOSED LINE AS PER CHAPTER VIII OF IRBM. 9. ON COMPLETION OF THE ALL WORKS RESTORE THE TRAFFIC TO NO MINIMUM SECTIONAL SPEED AS PER PIPE. 10. DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, ALL PRECautions TO BE Taken TO Ensure NO INSERT CONDITIONS EXISTS FOR MOVEMENT OF TRANSIT ON THE EXISTING MAIN LINE. 11. A PARTICULAR PRECaution Measures TO BE taken for MOVEMENT OF TRANSIT ON THE EXISTING MAIN LINE. 12. WORKING LANE IS NOT HAVING ANY PAST HISTORY AS PER DATA TAKEN FROM HYDERABAD DIVISION. 13. IF IT Should BE ENSORED THAT THE JUNCTION OF EXG. & PRO. BRIDges ARE MADE LEAK PROOF. WORKS EXECUTION ARRANGEMENTS: 1. AS PER THE RAILWAY BOARD LETTER No. 2022/TRANSCELL/CVIL/CRS, DATED 21.06.2022 PCS SANCTION SHOULD BE TAKEN BEFORE EXECUTION OF WORK. 2. IMPORTION OF SUITABLE SPEDIAL RESTRICTION ON EXISTING MAIN LINE AT BRIDGE LOCATION AS PER PIPE REQUIREMENTS. 3. WORK TO BE EXECUTED AS PER THE MODUS OPERANDI GIVEN IN THE DRAWING. IMPORTANT NOTES OF HQRS: 1. CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION HAS TO SUBMIT COMPLETION DRAWING OF GAD IN ORIGINAL DRY DUGGED BY THE OFFICIAL DUGGER AFTER IMPEDENT COMPLETION OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARA 911 OF INDIAN RAILWAY WORK MANUAL. 2. THE APPROVED DESIGN CALCULATIONS OF NEW STANDARD SUPER STRUCTURE AND SUBSTRUCTURE ARE MADE BY SUITABLE SPEDIAL RESTRICTION ON EXISTING MAIN LINE AT BRIDGE LOCATION AS PER PIPE REQUIREMENTS. 3. APPROVAL IS GIVEN ONLY FOR GENERAL ARRANGEMENTS. THE SUPER STRUCTURE IS AS PER PIPE DRAWING FOR ABUTMENTS WINGING RETURN WALLS FOR PROPOSED BRIDGE TO BE DESIGNED TO 251 LOADING 2008 AND GET APPROVED BY COMPETENT AUTHORITY. CERTIFICATES: DYCE/C/SC CERTIFIES THAT 1. THE DETAILED OF EXISTING BRIDE SUCH AS SPAN, CLEAR HEIGHT, LEVELS AND FLOW DIRECTION ETC, AS PER PIPE LENGTH. 2. LOADING STANDARD OF THE EXISTING BRIDE MKG-1987. 3. SBC OF THE SOIL IS 22.81 l/sm AT 1.50m DEPTH. 4. THE BRIDGE IS NOT HAVING ANY PAST HISTORY AS PER DATA TAKEN FROM HYDERABAD DIVISION. 5. THE EXG. BRIDGE IS NOT Affected By The 251 Axle Loading 2008 STANDARD PROPOSED BRIDGE. DYCE/C/DESIGN/HQ CERTIFIES THAT THE EXISTING BRIDE IS SAFE FOR DISPERSION OF PROPOSED BRIDGE 251 LOADING. NOTE: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED AND LEVELS ARE SHOWN IN METRES. 2. PROPOSED WORKS ARE SHOWN IN RED EXISTING WORKS SHOWN IN BLACK AND DISMANTLING WORKS SHOWN IN METRES. 3. THIS DRAWING IS PREPARED BASED ON DATA COLLECTED FROM SITE. 4. FORMATION LEVEL SHOWN IN THE DRAWING IS AS PER LONGitudinal SECTION. 5. SAFETY OF THE EXG. BRIDGE TO BE Ensured IN ALL ASPECTS WHILE EXECUTING PROPOSED BRIDGE WORKS. 6. DEPT OF FOUNDATION SHOWN IN THE DRAWING IS TENTATIVE. THE ACTUAL DEPTH SHALL BE AS DECIDED BY THE ENGINEER IN CHARGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPS CONCRETE BRIDGE CODE 2014. 7. IN CASE READY MIX CONCRETE IS TO BE USED THE MX SHALE SHALL BE IN CONFORMITY WITH RECOMMENDATION FOR OTHER ASPECTS WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY CEA. IS 929% SHALL BE ADDED TO. 8. ALL CONCRETE WORKS SHALL BE MECHANically MIXED AND VIBRATED. 9. ALL EXC CURVACES COMING IN CONTACT WITH SOIL SHOULD BE PAINTED WITH BITumen OR COLOR OF APPROVED QUALITY BY A445 GRAMM BEARLED FILLING THE EARTH. 10. WHIPE HOLE OF 75/100 PVC ACPIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED AT 1000/cm² BOTH CERTIFICATES AND STAGGER IN RETURN WAILS. 11. WHEEP HOLE OF 75/100 PVC ACPIES ARE TO BE PROVIDED AT 1000
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
010.png
NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN IN MILLimetres UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED & LEVELS ARE SHOWN IN METRES AND THE DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALLED. 2. PROPOSED WORKS ARE SHOWN IN RED, EXISTING WORKS ARE SHOWN IN BLACK AND DIAMANTING WORKS ARE SHOWN IN YELLOW. 3. BACK FILM MATERIAL SHALL BE AS PER CLAUSE 7.5 OF IRS BRIDGE SUB STRUCTURE CODE 2013 (REVISED) INCLUDING LATEST ACS. 4. DEPTH OF FOUNDATION IN THIS DRAWING SHOULD BE AS DECIDED BY ENGINEER-IN-Charge. 5. BOX TO BE PLACED ON NON ERODIBLE STRATA. 6. LOGITUDIANL DRAIN SHALL BE PROVIDED IN BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED TRACK AS PER SITE REQUIREMENTS. 7. THE DETAILS OF ITEMS SUCH AS BOULDER FILLING, GRADES OF CONCRETE, PITCHING, FLOORING, DROP WALL, CURTAIN WALL ETC., ARE SHOWN IN THE DRAWING. 8. SBC OF THE SOIL IS 15.05qm AT 1.50m DEPTH. 9. MAXIMUM FOUNDATION PRESSURE 14.00 t/sq.m. ENGINEER IN CHARGE SHALL SURE THAT SBC OF SOIL IS MORE THAN THE MAXIMUM FOUNDATION PRESSURE. CODES / MANUALS TO BE FOLLOWED : 1. IRS CONCRETE BRIDGE CODE REPRINT SEPTEMBER 2024 (REVISED) INCLUDING LATEST ACS READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH RELEVANT I.S. SPECIFICATIONS MENTIONED THERE IN. 2. IRS BRIDGE SUB STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATION CODE SECOND REVISION-2013 INCLUDING LATEST A/C SLIPS. 3. IRS BRIDGE RULES THIRD REPRINTING 2014 INCLUDING LATEST A/C SLIPS. 4. I.R. BRIDGE MANUAL - 1998 INCLUDING LATEST A/C SLIPS. 5. INDIAN RAILWAYS UNIFIED STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR MATERIALS AND WORKS - 2021. MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS : EXPOSURE CONDITION : MODERATE AS PER IRCBC WITH LATEST A/C SLIPS. 1. MINIMUM GRADE OF CONCRET DESIGN MIX CONFORMING TO: M-30: RCC BOX. M-25: FOUNDATION & SUB STRUCTURE, WEARING COAT. M-20: TOE WALL, CURTAIN WALL/DROP WALL. MINIMUM GRADE OF STEEL: Fe-500 (CONFORMING TO IS-1786). FINEL / COARSE AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO IS-383. CEMENT OPC CONFORMING TO IS: 269 HIGH STRENGTH ORDINARY PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO IS: 8112 (GRade 43) AND IS: 12269 (Grade 53) MAY ALSO BE USED WHERE REQUIRED FROM CONSIDERATION OF MIX DESIGN. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE OF DESIGN MIX CONFORMING TO IS: 10262. 3. READY MIX CONCRETE CONFORMING TO IS: 4926. 25t - AXLE LOADING OF 2008 SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY CAO/C/O/SC CAO/C/D/BR/-2025(EPC) AUTHORITY OF WORK: - 44 OF 2024-25 (UMBRELLA WORK PB No. 57/2019-20 NR). REFERENCES : 1. FOR DETAILS OF RCC BOX REFER DRG. No. RDSO/B 10155/2 OF SIZE 2.00x1.80m (1.00m FIL HEIGHT) 2. FOR EXISTING BRIDGE COMPLETION DRAWING REFER DRG. No. CAO/C/BR/25-98(COMP) 3. FOR DETAILS OF WEEP HOLES AND BACK FILING REFER DRG. No. GM/W/C/BR/1453-90. 4. FOR DETAILS OF ENGINEERING INDICATORS REFER DRG. No. GM/W/C/BR/2570-2009. 5. FOR DETAILS OF DROP / CURTAIN TOE WALLS REFER PCE'S LETTER No. 71/BR/BRIDGE POLICY, DATED 10/11/2015. 6. WORKING PLAN / SECTION REFER DRAWING No.: CAO/C/T/R/S/MBNR-DHNE/2182-2024. 7. FOR ESP OF ULINDAKONDA STATION REFER DRG No.: CAO/C/C/SC/VARDS/HYB/UKD/151-2024. WORKS EXECUTION ARRANGEMENTS : 1. AS PER THE RAILWAY BOARD LETTER No. 2022/TRANSCEIL/CIVIL/CRS, DATED 21.06.2022 PICE SANCTION SHOULD BE TAKEN BEFORE EXECUTION OF WORK. 2. IMPOSITION OF SUITABLE SPEED RESTRICTION ON EXISTING MAINLINE AT BRIDGE LOCATION AS AND WHEN REQUIRED AS PER IRPWM. 3. WORK TO BE EXECUTED AS PER THE MODUS OPERANDI GIVEN IN THE DRAWING. IMPORTANT NOTES OF HQRS : 1. CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION HAS TO SUBMIT COMPLETION DRAWING OF GAD IN ORIGINAL DULLY SIGNED BY THE OFFICIALS AFTER IMEDIATE COMPLETION OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARA 911 OF INDIAN RAILWAY WORKS MANUAL. 2. HQS APPROVAL GIVEN IS ONLY FOR GENERAL ARRANGEMENTS. THE SUPER STRUCTURE IS AS PER RDSO DRAWING. STRUCTURAL DRAWING FOR ABUTMENT, WING AND RETURN WALLS FOR PROPOSED BRIDGE TO BE DESIGNED TO 25l LOADING 2008 AND GET APPROVED BY COMPETENT AUTHORITY. 3. THE APPROVED DESIGN CALCUATIONS OF NON STANDARD SUPER STRUCTURE AND SUB STRUCTURE IF ANY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PCE OFFICE /SCR/CF FOR RECORD PURPOSE. CERTIFICATES : DYCE/C/I/SC CERTIFIES THAT 1. THE DETAILS OF EXISTING BRIDGE SUCH AS SPAN, CLEAR HEIGHT, LEVELS AND FLOW DIRECTION ETC., AS PER SITE CONDITION. 2. LOADING STANDARD OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE IS MBG-1987 AS PER COMPLETION DRAWING. 3. SBC OF THE SOIL IS 15.05 t/sqm AT 1.50m DEPTH & PROPOSED RCC BOX IS ON NON ERODIBLE STRATA. 4. THE BRIDGE IS NOT HAVING ANY PAST HISTORY AS PER DATA TAKEN FROM HYDERABAD DIVISION. 5. THE BRIDGE IS NOT UNDER VULNERABLE LIST. CAO/C/C/SC CERTIFICATES : DYCE/C/D/SC CERTIFIES THAT THE EXISTING BRIDGE IS SAFE FOR DISPERSION OF PROPOSED BRIDGE 25l LOADING. SPECIAL NOTE : WHILE EXCAVATING FOR FOUNDATION OF PROPOSED BRIDGE, SAFETY OF ADJACENT EXG. BRIDGE SHOULD BE ENSURED.
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
011.png
WEEP HOLES 100 Ø AT 1000 C/C BED LEVEL 295.143 1 IN 8 3942 4092 1:1 1500 3300 1200 600 150TH. LEVELLING COURSE 600 1200 680 450 1360 600 4890 297.143 WEEP HOLES 100 Ø AT 1000 C/C BED LEVEL 295.143 1:1 1500 3300 1200 600 150TH. LEVELLING 4110 C/S OF WING WALL @ MIN. HEIGHT OF WING WALL @ MAX. HEIGHT ING CAPACITY OF SOIL - 42.00 t/sqm SURE ON SOIL UNDER WING WALL - 31.28 t/sqm PRO. RAIL LEVEL 299.997 PRO. FORMATION LEVEL 299.235 TOE WALL 1000 300 1200 600 150 4345 C/OF PRO. UP LINE 3925 2725 850 10 1676 B.R. PSC SLAB RCC BED BLOCK BED LEVEL 295.143 3300 C/OF PRO. UP LINE 2725 850 10 1676
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
012.png
SPECIFICATIONS: EMPIRE CONDITION: MODERATE AS PER INCIDE WITH LATEST AAC SUPP. CASE OF CONNECTION FOR VOLVULATION CASE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH HS CONNECTED BRIDGE CODE 2014 WHERE HS CONNECTED BRIDGE CODE IS MENTIONED. ALL WORK ARE CARRIED OUT AS PER THE FOLLOWING: 1. ALL WORK ARE CARRIED OUT AS PER THE FOLLOWING: 2. ALL WORK ARE CARRIED OUT AS PER THE FOLLOWING: 3. ALL WORK ARE CARRIED OUT AS PER THE FOLLOWING: 4. ALL WORK ARE CARRIED OUT AS PER THE FOLLOWING: CONSTRUCTION AND BIRDHOUSE DESIGN: MAZ.C.C. 8.24 GRADES USING 20mm MAXIMUM SIZE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH EXISTING ARTIFACTS WHICH WILL BE GRADED HARD STONE ACCOMPANYING WITH
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]
013.png
FIRST FLOOR PLAN OPEN TERRACE OPEN TO SKY 1.50M WIDE CORRIDOR ROOM 4.83x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 3.60x4.20 ROOM 4.83x4.20
[{"model_id": "zai-org/GLM-OCR", "model_name": "GLM-OCR", "column_name": "markdown", "timestamp": "2026-02-09T04:12:23.732883", "task": "ocr", "temperature": 0.01, "top_p": 1e-05, "repetition_penalty": 1.1, "max_tokens": 16384}]

Document OCR using GLM-OCR

This dataset contains OCR results from images in minhpvo/ocr-input using GLM-OCR, a compact 0.9B OCR model achieving SOTA performance.

Processing Details

  • Source Dataset: minhpvo/ocr-input
  • Model: zai-org/GLM-OCR
  • Task: text recognition
  • Number of Samples: 13
  • Processing Time: 2.2 min
  • Processing Date: 2026-02-09 04:12 UTC

Configuration

  • Image Column: image
  • Output Column: markdown
  • Dataset Split: train
  • Batch Size: 16
  • Max Model Length: 8,192 tokens
  • Max Output Tokens: 16,384
  • Temperature: 0.01
  • Top P: 1e-05
  • GPU Memory Utilization: 80.0%

Model Information

GLM-OCR is a compact, high-performance OCR model:

  • 0.9B parameters
  • 94.62% on OmniDocBench V1.5
  • CogViT visual encoder + GLM-0.5B language decoder
  • Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) loss for efficiency
  • Multilingual: zh, en, fr, es, ru, de, ja, ko
  • MIT licensed

Dataset Structure

The dataset contains all original columns plus:

  • markdown: The extracted text in markdown format
  • inference_info: JSON list tracking all OCR models applied to this dataset

Reproduction 

uv run https://huggingface.co/datasets/uv-scripts/ocr/raw/main/glm-ocr.py \
    minhpvo/ocr-input \
    <output-dataset> \
    --image-column image \
    --batch-size 16 \
    --task ocr

Generated with UV Scripts

Downloads last month
-
Size of downloaded dataset files:
15.2 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
15.2 MB
Number of rows:
13