| # 235_D. Graph Game |
| |
| ## Problem Description |
| In computer science, there is a method called "Divide And Conquer By Node" to solve some hard problems about paths on a tree. Let's desribe how this method works by function: |
| |
| solve(t) (t is a tree): |
| |
| 1. Chose a node x (it's common to chose weight-center) in tree t. Let's call this step "Line A". |
| 2. Deal with all paths that pass x. |
| 3. Then delete x from tree t. |
| 4. After that t becomes some subtrees. |
| 5. Apply solve on each subtree. |
| |
| |
| |
| This ends when t has only one node because after deleting it, there's nothing. |
| |
| Now, WJMZBMR has mistakenly believed that it's ok to chose any node in "Line A". So he'll chose a node at random. To make the situation worse, he thinks a "tree" should have the same number of edges and nodes! So this procedure becomes like that. |
| |
| Let's define the variable totalCost. Initially the value of totalCost equal to 0. So, solve(t) (now t is a graph): |
| |
| 1. totalCost = totalCost + (size of t). The operation "=" means assignment. (Size of t) means the number of nodes in t. |
| 2. Choose a node x in graph t at random (uniformly among all nodes of t). |
| 3. Then delete x from graph t. |
| 4. After that t becomes some connected components. |
| 5. Apply solve on each component. |
| |
| |
| |
| He'll apply solve on a connected graph with n nodes and n edges. He thinks it will work quickly, but it's very slow. So he wants to know the expectation of totalCost of this procedure. Can you help him? |
| |
| Input |
| |
| The first line contains an integer n (3 ≤ n ≤ 3000) — the number of nodes and edges in the graph. Each of the next n lines contains two space-separated integers ai, bi (0 ≤ ai, bi ≤ n - 1) indicating an edge between nodes ai and bi. |
| |
| Consider that the graph nodes are numbered from 0 to (n - 1). It's guaranteed that there are no self-loops, no multiple edges in that graph. It's guaranteed that the graph is connected. |
| |
| Output |
| |
| Print a single real number — the expectation of totalCost. Your answer will be considered correct if its absolute or relative error does not exceed 10 - 6. |
| |
| Examples |
| |
| Input |
| |
| 5 |
| 3 4 |
| 2 3 |
| 2 4 |
| 0 4 |
| 1 2 |
| |
| |
| Output |
| |
| 13.166666666666666 |
| |
| |
| Input |
| |
| 3 |
| 0 1 |
| 1 2 |
| 0 2 |
| |
| |
| Output |
| |
| 6.000000000000000 |
| |
| |
| Input |
| |
| 5 |
| 0 1 |
| 1 2 |
| 2 0 |
| 3 0 |
| 4 1 |
| |
| |
| Output |
| |
| 13.166666666666666 |
| |
| Note |
| |
| Consider the second example. No matter what we choose first, the totalCost will always be 3 + 2 + 1 = 6. |
| |
| ## Contest Information |
| - **Contest ID**: 235 |
| - **Problem Index**: D |
| - **Points**: 2000.0 |
| - **Rating**: 3000 |
| - **Tags**: graphs |
| - **Time Limit**: {'seconds': 2, 'nanos': 0} seconds |
| - **Memory Limit**: 256000000 bytes |
| |
| ## Task |
| Solve this competitive programming problem. Provide a complete solution that handles all the given constraints and edge cases. |