instruction
stringlengths
0
29.8k
⌀
null
Im taking a course on Theoretical computer Science. and I use Sipser's `Introduction to Theory of Computation` as my reference manual. However, many times I find myself lost in the proofs. Ive tried following Shai Simpson's online lectures ,but would prefer something more watered down and easier to understand. Im open...
Supporting material for theory of computation
|automata|
Suppose I am making a red-black search tree, and in my right subtree, I have a black node, then a red node, and it has two black children, the black children further black childrens. As such a lemma has been made that red-black trees with $n$ internal nodes have height at most $2\log(n+1)$, would this proof still hold ...
Can you have three consecutive black nodes in red-black search tree?
|data-structures|binary-trees|search-trees|
|computer-architecture|parallel-computing|matrices|
To prevent collisions, hash tables with open addressing use a methodology to chain the contents. Why can't we use another hash table allocated to each slot of the primary hash table?
Why can't we use a hash tables for collision resolving in hash tables?
|data-structures|hash-tables|
I have the following pseudo code: Multiply(y,z) 1. if (z==0) return 0 2. else if (z is odd) 3. then return (Multiply(2y, floor(z/2)) + y ) 4. else return (Multiply(2y, floor(z/2))) Towards analysing this procedure's runtime, this recurrence relation is given...
How does this recurrence relation fit the algorithm?
|time-complexity|algorithm-analysis|asymptotics|recurrence-relation|
You should be careful about what is being counted. If you want to count "runtime" (as in, number of statements) the given recurrence is clearly wrong. Reverse-engineering from the recurrence, it is probably supposed to count *additions*. In particular, note how the computation the parameters for recursive calls is i...
How do you prove that the expected height of a randomly built [binary search tree][1] with $n$ nodes is $O(\log n)$? There is a proof in CLRS _Introduction to Algorithms_ (chapter 12.4), but I don't understand it. [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_search_tree
Proof that a randomly built binary search tree has logarithmic height
|data-structures|algorithm-analysis|binary-trees|search-trees|
Here is my proof, but I am not sure whether it is correct. We know: $\qquad \begin{array}{l} \forall {c_1},\exists {n_1},0 \le f\left( n \right) \le {c_1}g\left( n \right),\forall n \ge {n_1} \\ \forall {c_1},\exists {n_2},0 \le g\left( n \right) \le {c_1}h\left( n \right),\forall n \ge {n_2} \\ \end{arra...
How to prove transitivity in small-o of asymptotic analysis?
|asymptotics|check-my-proof|
I am new to this topic, and in some scientific papers I've been reading about prediction in sports I encountered the term rule based reasoner. Is it this term the same as a semantic reasoner( where the two main directions are forward and backwards chaining?). If yes, can you point out the difference between a decision ...
|terminology|artificial-intelligence|data-mining|
|data-structures|algorithm-analysis|binary-trees|search-trees|average-case|
What's the use of studying trigonometry in computer science? I mean, is it essential? Does it have a specific application in computer science? Because I can't seem to muster enough motivation for learning it.
Trigonometry in computer science
|education|mathematical-analysis|applied-theory|
> **Possible Duplicate:** > [List of intro TCS books for those who don’t know much about TCS](http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/454/list-of-intro-tcs-books-for-those-who-dont-know-much-about-tcs) <!-- End of automatically inserted text --> Im taking a course on Theoretical computer Science. and I use Sipser'...
{"OriginalQuestionIds":[454],"Voters":[{"Id":98,"DisplayName":"Raphael"}]}
No, they're not the same. And you're right (I'm assuming about the algorithm you're describing): it's recursive. The reason is the definition of both words, which you can read in a dictionary or Wikipedia. Induction (assuming 'mathematical induction') is specifically about proving that all cases of an argument ar...
Let's first think about this intuitively. In the best-case scenario, the tree is perfectly balanced; in the worst-case scenario, the tree is entirely unbalanced: ![Height-balanced binary search tree][1]![Worst-case binary search tree][2] Starting from the root node $p$, this left tree has twice as many nodes at...
From what I've read, an example of infinite ambiguity is usually given in a form of a loop: $S \rightarrow aA \\ A \rightarrow B \\ B \rightarrow A \\ B \rightarrow b$ But a grammar is called *ambiguous* if there's more than 1 way to derive the input string &omega;. What if I then take this well-known ambiguou...
What precisely is infinite ambiguity in a grammar?
|formal-grammars|
Let's first think about this intuitively. In the best-case scenario, the tree is perfectly balanced; in the worst-case scenario, the tree is entirely unbalanced: ![Height-balanced binary search tree][1]![Worst-case binary search tree][2] Starting from the root node $p$, this left tree has twice as many nodes at...
|terminology|formal-grammars|ambiguity|
|algorithms|algorithm-analysis|runtime-analysis|average-case|
I know I'm pretty late, but oh well. There's a class of grammars known as indexed grammars (describing indexed languages, which are a proper subset of CS languages and a superset of CF languages). The rules look very much like the ones in a CF grammar, but every LHS nonterminal has an associated stack of *index symb...
Consider this graph with $2k$ nodes: ![enter image description here][1] <sup>[[source](http://verrech.net/sefiles/cs_4898.tikz)]</sup> From how you describe how you choose the edges to be removed, it is not clear what should happen. If for all pairs $(1,k), (2,k), \ldots, (k-1,k)$ the same node is chosen, you ...
###Closure Properties### Once you have a small collection of non-context-free languages you can often use [closure properties](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_language#Closure_properties) of $\mathrm{CFL}$ like this: > Assume $L \in \mathrm{CFL}$. Then, by closure property X (together with Y), $L' \in \...
null
One can compress data with straight-line grammars. An algorithm that employs this technique is called *Sequitur*. If I understood correctly, Sequitur basically does these three steps till the grammar does not change anymore: 1. For each rule, try to find any sequences of symbols in any other rule that match the rule...
Will this algorithm terminate on any input?
|formal-grammars|data-compression|
This is my idea for a proof although I am not quite sure whether it works: Consider $r$, the number of symbols on all right-hand sides and $n$, the number of nonterminals. Whenever step one fires, $r$ decreases. Whenever step two fires, $n$ increases by one and $r$ stays the same (in case only two pairs are found) o...
|algorithms|algorithm-analysis|formal-grammars|data-compression|correctness-proof|
I know I'm pretty late, but oh well. There's a class of grammars known as indexed grammars (describing indexed languages, which are a proper subset of CS languages and a superset of CF languages). The rules look very much like the ones in a CF grammar, but every LHS nonterminal has an associated stack of *index symb...
Can all [packing problems][1] be rephrased as [set packing problems][2]? Can all [covering problems][3] be rephrased as [set covering problems][4]? In other words, I was wondering if set packing/covering problems are the most general forms of packing/covering problems? BTW, do these problems belong to combinat...
Can all packing/covering problems be rephrased as set packing/covering problems?
|optimization|
![search tree][1] [1]: https://i.stack.imgur.com/2hUx4.jpg **Problem : Two players have in front of them a single pile of objects, say a stack of 7 pennies. The first player divides the original stack into two stacks that must be unequal. Each player alternatively thereafter does the same to some single st...
Nim game tree + minimax
|artificial-intelligence|search-trees|game-theory|
Because - according to the rules above - each player must divide a stack into two stacks that must be unequal.
I have two vector points: `p1` and `p2`. Each point has a color value `c1` and `c2`. Now using `linear interpolation`, I would like to get the color value at point `p3`. Concrete example: p_1 = (1, 3) with color value c1 = (2, 4, 1) p_2 = (4, 4) with color value c2 = (3, 1, 2) What color does `p_3` have with...
Computergraphics: Linear Interpolation
|graphics|mathematical-programming|
I have two vector points: `p1` and `p2`. Each point has a color value `c1` and `c2`. Now using `linear interpolation`, I would like to get the color value at point `p3`. Concrete example: p_1 = (1, 3) with color value c1 = (2, 4, 1) p_2 = (4, 4) with color value c2 = (3, 1, 2) What color does `p_3` h...
null
There's a bit of ambiguity in what you're looking for here. I am going to assume it's the running time of the function. I agree that it should be 1 when $z=0$ because it generally is considered to take $O(1)$ operations to return a function value. However, this will only affect your final answer by an additive con...
null
n no. of strings are sorted in lexicographical order and stored in a balanced binary search tree. You are provided with a prefix x and of which M no.of strings have the prefix x. I have devised the following algorithm, where i search till i find the first occurance of the prefix x in one of the nodes. And then i run an...
Can you have a binary search tree with O(logn + M) property for the following case
|binary-trees|search-trees|
null
One can compress data with straight-line grammars. An algorithm that employs this technique is called *Sequitur*. If I understood correctly, Sequitur basically starts with one rule representing the input and then does these three steps till the grammar does not change anymore: 1. For each rule, try to find any seque...
By making use of the fact that sorting $n$ numbers requires $(n log n)$ steps for any optimal algorithm (which uses 'comparison' for sorting), how can I prove that finding the [convex-hull][1] of $n$ points has the lower bound of $ (n log n)$ steps? [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_hull
Lower bound for Convex hull
|complexity-theory|
If you could create the convex-hull in sub $O(n log n)$ time, this would imply, that you can sort $n$ numbers in sub $O(nlogn)$ time. You do this with contradiction. You have $n$ numbers $(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)$, which you would like to sort. From these numbers, you create points $P$ in 2D space in some fashion. F...
Let $n$ be the number of strings which are sorted in lexicographical order and stored in a balanced binary search tree. You are provided with a prefix $x$ of which $M$ strings have the prefix $x$. I have devised the following algorithm, where I search until I find the first occurence of the prefix $x$ in one of the nod...
null
Let $n$ be the number of strings which are sorted in lexicographical order and stored in a balanced binary search tree. You are provided with a prefix $x$ of which $M$ strings have the prefix $x$. I have devised the following algorithm, where I search until I find the first occurence of the prefix $x$ in one of the nod...
If you could create the convex-hull in sub $O(n log n)$ time, this would imply, that you can sort $n$ numbers in sub $O(nlogn)$ time. You do this with contradiction. You have $n$ numbers $(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)$, which you would like to sort. From these numbers, you create points $P$ in 2D space in some fashion. F...
If you could create the convex-hull in sub $O(n log n)$ time, this would imply, that you can sort $n$ numbers in sub $O(nlogn)$ time. You do this with contradiction. You have $n$ numbers $(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)$, which you would like to sort. From these numbers, you create points $P$ in 2D space in some fashion. F...
By making use of the fact that sorting $n$ numbers requires $(n \log n)$ steps for any optimal algorithm (which uses 'comparison' for sorting), how can I prove that finding the [convex-hull][1] of $n$ points has the lower bound of $\Omega (n \log n)$ steps? [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_hull
|complexity-theory|computational-geometry|lower-bounds|
The well known $SAT$ problem is defined [here][1] for reference sake. The $DOUBLE- SAT $ problem is defined as- $DOUBLE-SAT$ = {< $f$ > | $f$ has at least two satisfying assignments} How do we prove it to be $NP- complete$ ? More than one way to prove will be appreciated. [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/...
Proving $DOUBE-SAT$ as $NP-complete$
|np-complete|satisfiability|
By making use of the fact that sorting $n$ numbers requires $(n \log n)$ steps for any optimal algorithm (which uses 'comparison' for sorting), how can I prove that finding the [convex-hull][1] of $n$ points is bounded by $\Omega (n \log n)$ steps? [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_hull
null
The well known SAT problem is defined [here][1] for reference sake. The DOUBLE-SAT problem is defined as DOUBLE-SAT = {< $f$ > | $f$ has at least two satisfying assignments} How do we prove it to be NP-complete? More than one way to prove will be appreciated. [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_...
Proving DOUBLE-SAT is NP-complete
The well known SAT problem is defined [here][1] for reference sake. The DOUBLE-SAT problem is defined as DOUBLE-SAT = {<$\phi$> | $\phi$ has at least two satisfying assignments} How do we prove it to be NP-complete? More than one way to prove will be appreciated. [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bool...
I have two vector points $p_1$ and $p_2$. Each point has a color value $c_1$ and $c_2$. Now using *linear interpolation*, I would like to get the color value at point $p_3$. Concrete example: $\qquad \displaystyle p_1 = (1, 3) \text{ with } c_1 = (2, 4, 1)$ $\qquad \displaystyle p_2 = (4, 4) \text{ with } c_2...
Computer graphics: Linear Interpolation
|graphics|
The well known SAT problem is defined [here][1] for reference sake. The DOUBLE-SAT problem is defined as $\qquad \mathsf{DOUBLE\text{-}SAT} = \{\langle\phi\rangle \mid \phi \text{ has at least two satisfying assignments}\}$ How do we prove it to be NP-complete? More than one way to prove will be appreciat...
You know that $\mathsf{SAT}$ is NP-complete. Can you find a reduction from $\mathsf{SAT}$ to $\mathsf{DOUBLE\text{-}SAT}$? That is, can you manipulate a satisfiable formula so that the result has at least two satisfying assignments? Note that the same manipulation can not render unsatisiable formulae satisfiable. >!...
Here is one solution: Clearly Double-SAT belongs to NP, since a NTM can decide Double-SAT as follows: On a Boolean input formula $\phi$ (x1, ... ,xn), nondeterministically guess 2 assignments and verfy whether both satisfy $\phi$. To show that Double-SAT is NP-Complete, we give a reduction from SAT to Double-SAT...
Here is one solution: Clearly Double-SAT belongs to ${\sf NP}$, since a NTM can decide Double-SAT as follows: On a Boolean input formula $\phi(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$, nondeterministically guess 2 assignments and verify whether both satisfy $\phi$. To show that Double-SAT is ${\sf NP}$-Complete, we give a reduction fro...
|complexity-theory|np-complete|satisfiability|
Here is one solution: Clearly Double-SAT belongs to ${\sf NP}$, since a NTM can decide Double-SAT as follows: On a Boolean input formula $\phi(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$, nondeterministically guess 2 assignments and verify whether both satisfy $\phi$. To show that Double-SAT is ${\sf NP}$-Complete, we give a reduction fro...
null
null
If you could create the convex-hull in sub $O(n \log n)$ time, this would imply, that you can sort $n$ numbers in sub $O(n\log n)$ time. You do this with contradiction. You have $n$ numbers $(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)$, which you would like to sort. From these numbers, you create points $P$ in 2D space in some fashion...
If you could create the convex-hull in $o(n \log n)$ time, this would imply, that you can sort $n$ numbers in $o(n\log n)$ time. You do this with contradiction. You have $n$ numbers $(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)$, which you would like to sort. From these numbers, you create points $P$ in 2D space in some fashion. For ex...
By making use of the fact that sorting $n$ numbers requires $\Omega(n \log n)$ steps for any optimal algorithm (which uses 'comparison' for sorting), how can I prove that finding the [convex-hull][1] of $n$ points is bounded by $\Omega (n \log n)$ steps? [1]:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convex_hull