opinion stringlengths 338 298k | instruction stringclasses 1
value | question stringclasses 1
value | choices sequencelengths 3 3 | answer sequencelengths 1 1 | id int64 1 2k | problem stringlengths 3.56k 41k | reasoning stringlengths 1.07k 27.4k | deepseek_solution stringlengths 48 3.19k | verify bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al.
No. 73-1157.
Decided June 3, 1974
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 1 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let's try to figure out the ideological direction of the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Gerstein v. Coe. First, I need to understand the case details. The Supreme Court's per curiam decision from 1974 mentions that a three-judge District Court declared a Florida statute unconstitutional... | The decision reviewed by the Supreme Court was from a three-judge District Court that declared a Florida statute unconstitutional. The statute required spousal consent for abortions for married women and parental consent for minors. Striking down such restrictions aligns with a **pro-female stance in abortion cases**, ... | false |
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al.
No. 73-1157.
Decided June 3, 1974
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 1 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let's try to figure out the ideological direction of the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in this case. The case is Gerstein v. Coe, decided in 1974. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction, so they didn't actually rule on the merits of the case. But we need to determ... | The lower court's decision in **Gerstein v. Coe** held a Florida statute unconstitutional for requiring spousal or parental consent for abortions. Applying the provided framework:
- **Abortion context**: A pro-female stance (striking down restrictions on abortion access) is explicitly categorized as **liberal**.
- ... | false |
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al.
No. 73-1157.
Decided June 3, 1974
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 1 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is asking whether the decision of the lower court that the Supreme Court reviewed was liberal or conservative. The case is Gerstein v. Coe, decided in 1974.
First, I need to understand what the lower court did. The Supreme Court's per curiam opinion mentions that a ... | The lower court's decision in Gerstein v. Coe involved striking down a Florida statute requiring spousal or parental consent for abortions. Applying the provided framework for ideological direction:
- **Context**: Abortion rights fall under "pro-female in abortion," which is explicitly defined as a **liberal** positi... | false |
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al.
No. 73-1157.
Decided June 3, 1974
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 1 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let's tackle this question step by step. The task is to determine whether the decision of the lower court that the Supreme Court reviewed was liberal or conservative, based on the given definitions.
First, I need to understand the case summary provided. The case is Gerstein et al. v. Coe et al., decided by the ... | The lower court's decision was **liberal**.
**Analysis:**
1. **Issue Context**: The case pertains to abortion rights, falling under civil rights and privacy, specifically a pro-female stance in abortion issues as per the liberal definition.
2. **Lower Court's Ruling**: The three-judge District Court invalidated a... | false |
GERSTEIN et al. v. COE et al.
No. 73-1157.
Decided June 3, 1974
Per Curiam.
A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory-judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.22 (3) (Supp. 1974^-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and i... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 1 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let me try to work through this problem step by step. The question is about determining whether the decision of the lower court that the Supreme Court reviewed was liberal or conservative. The case is Gerstein v. Coe, decided in 1974. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction and denied cert... | The lower court's decision in **Gerstein v. Coe** struck down a Florida statute requiring spousal or parental consent for abortions. Applying the provided framework:
- **Abortion-related issues**: A pro-female stance (supporting abortion rights without third-party consent) is explicitly defined as **liberal**.
- Th... | false |
PRINCE v. UNITED STATES.
No. 132.
Argued December 11, 1956.
Decided February 25, 1957.
Joseph P. Jenkins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Felicia Dubrovs... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 2 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, so I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Prince v. United States was liberal or conservative. Let me start by understanding the case and the Supreme Court's decision.
From the opinion, the key issue was whether the Federal Bank Robbery Act allowed consecutive ... | The lower court's decision (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit) upheld consecutive sentences for the defendant under the Federal Bank Robbery Act, allowing cumulative punishment for both entering a bank with intent to rob and the completed robbery. This approach favored the government’s authority to impose harsher ... | true |
PRINCE v. UNITED STATES.
No. 132.
Argued December 11, 1956.
Decided February 25, 1957.
Joseph P. Jenkins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Felicia Dubrovs... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 2 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, let's try to figure out the ideological direction of the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Prince v. United States. The user wants to know if the lower court's decision was liberal or conservative based on the given criteria.
First, I need to understand the case. The Supreme Court reverse... | The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) in **Prince v. United States** is **conservative**.
### Key Analysis:
1. **Context**: The case pertains to **criminal procedure**, specifically whether consecutive sentences for bank robbery and entering a bank with intent... | true |
PRINCE v. UNITED STATES.
No. 132.
Argued December 11, 1956.
Decided February 25, 1957.
Joseph P. Jenkins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Felicia Dubrovs... | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 2 | What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine whether the decision of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed was itself liberal or conservative. In the context of issues pertaining to criminal procedure, civil rights, First Amendment, due process, privacy... | Okay, I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Prince v. United States was liberal or conservative. Let me start by understanding the case.
The issue here was about the Federal Bank Robbery Act. The petitioner, Prince, was convicted on two counts: robbery and entering... | The lower court's decision in **Prince v. United States** upheld consecutive sentences for both bank robbery and unlawful entry with intent to commit robbery under the Federal Bank Robbery Act. This outcome imposed a harsher penalty on the defendant by treating the two charges as distinct offenses. Under the provided f... | true |
"PRINCE v. UNITED STATES.\nNo. 132.\nArgued December 11, 1956.\nDecided February 25, 1957.\nJoseph P(...TRUNCATED) | "What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED) | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 2 | "What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, I need to determine whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Pri(...TRUNCATED) | "The ideological direction of the lower court's decision (the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) review(...TRUNCATED) | false |
"PRINCE v. UNITED STATES.\nNo. 132.\nArgued December 11, 1956.\nDecided February 25, 1957.\nJoseph P(...TRUNCATED) | "What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED) | What is the ideological direction of the decision reviewed by the Supreme Court? | [
"Conservative",
"Liberal",
"Unspecifiable"
] | [
0
] | 2 | "What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine w(...TRUNCATED) | "Okay, I need to figure out whether the lower court's decision that the Supreme Court reviewed in Pr(...TRUNCATED) | "The lower court (Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit) affirmed the district court's imposition o(...TRUNCATED) | true |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 16