judgement stringlengths 875 58.4k | summary stringlengths 200 12.9k | original_judgment stringlengths 875 58.4k | processed_judgment stringlengths 875 19.4k | original_summary stringlengths 200 12.9k | processed_summary stringlengths 200 4.87k | judgment_bleu float64 0.05 1 | judgment_rouge float64 0.4 1 | summary_bleu float64 0.05 1 | summary_rouge float64 0.4 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Civil Appeal No.94 of 1949.
107 834 Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judi cature at Patna in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 97 of 1946 (Mannohar Lall and Mukherji JJ.) dated 23rd Decem ber, 1947, confirming the judgment of the District Judge of Purulia in Appeal No. 159 of 1944.
S.P. Sinha (P. K... | An agreement for a lease, which a lease is by the Indian declared to include, must be a document which effects an actual demise and operates as a lease.
It must create present and immediate interest in land.
Where a litigation between two persons A and B who claimed to be tenants under C was settled by a compromise dec... | Civil Appeal No.94 of 1949.
107 834 Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judi cature at Patna in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 97 of 1946 (Mannohar Lall and Mukherji JJ.) dated 23rd Decem ber, 1947, confirming the judgment of the District Judge of Purulia in Appeal No. 159 of 1944.
S.P. Sinha (P. K... | Civil Appeal No.94 of 1949.
107 834 Appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judi cature at Patna in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 97 of 1946 (Mannohar Lall and Mukherji JJ.) dated 23rd Decem ber, 1947, confirming the judgment of the District Judge of Purulia in Appeal No. 159 of 1944.
S.P. Sinha (P. K... | An agreement for a lease, which a lease is by the Indian declared to include, must be a document which effects an actual demise and operates as a lease.
It must create present and immediate interest in land.
Where a litigation between two persons A and B who claimed to be tenants under C was settled by a compromise dec... | An agreement for a lease, which a lease is by the Indian declared to include, must be a document which effects an actual demise and operates as a lease.
It must create present and immediate interest in land.
Where a litigation between two persons A and B who claimed to be tenants under C was settled by a compromise dec... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4221 of 1988.
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.12.1987 of the Delhi High Court in FAO (OS) No. 120 of 1987.
Mukul Rohtagi and Miss Bina Gupta for the petitioner.
Soli J. Sorabji, D.K. Sorab, P. Jain, Sushil Kr.
Jain and Sudhanshu Atreya for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court... | An agreement for distribution of the film "Savere Wali Gadi" was entered into on 19th March, 1983 between the petitioner as the distributor and the respondent as the producer.
The agreement contained an arbitration clause.
A sum of Rs.3.40 lakhs paid to the respondent and acknowledged by him earlier to the agreement wa... | Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4221 of 1988.
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.12.1987 of the Delhi High Court in FAO (OS) No. 120 of 1987.
Mukul Rohtagi and Miss Bina Gupta for the petitioner.
Soli J. Sorabji, D.K. Sorab, P. Jain, Sushil Kr.
Jain and Sudhanshu Atreya for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court... | Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4221 of 1988.
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.12.1987 of the Delhi High Court in FAO (OS) No. 120 of 1987.
Mukul Rohtagi and Miss Bina Gupta for the petitioner.
Soli J. Sorabji, D.K. Sorab, P. Jain, Sushil Kr.
Jain and Sudhanshu Atreya for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court... | An agreement for distribution of the film "Savere Wali Gadi" was entered into on 19th March, 1983 between the petitioner as the distributor and the respondent as the producer.
The agreement contained an arbitration clause.
A sum of Rs.3.40 lakhs paid to the respondent and acknowledged by him earlier to the agreement wa... | An agreement for distribution of the film "Savere Wali Gadi" was entered into on 19th March, 1983 between the petitioner as the distributor and the respondent as the producer.
The agreement contained an arbitration clause.
A sum of Rs.3.40 lakhs paid to the respondent and acknowledged by him earlier to the agreement wa... | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
he refund of cess paid by them.
[304D] & CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petitions Nos.
2687, 5822 of 1983 etc.
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
Dr. Shankar Ghosh, T.S.K. Iyer, M.L. Lahoty, P.S. Jha, D.D. Gupta, S.K. Jain, D.P. Mukherjee, S.R. Srivastava, P.N. Tewari and Parijat Sinha for the petition... | Section 4(1) of the West Bengal Rural Employment.
and Production Act, 1976 provided for levy of rural employment cess on immovable properties.
Clause (aa) of section 4(2) as amended by section 7(b) of the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amend ment) Act, 1981 provided for levy of rural employment cess in respect of tea estat... | he refund of cess paid by them.
[304D] & CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petitions Nos.
2687, 5822 of 1983 etc.
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India).
Dr. Shankar Ghosh, T.S.K. Iyer, M.L. Lahoty, P.S. Jha, D.D. Gupta, S.K. Jain, D.P. Mukherjee, S.R. Srivastava, P.N. Tewari and Parijat Sinha for the petition... | [304D] & CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petitions Nos. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Dr. Shankar Ghosh, T.S.K. Iyer, M.L. Lahoty, P.S. Jha, D.D. Gupta, S.K. Jain, D.P. Mukherjee, S.R. Srivastava, P.N. Tewari and Parijat Sinha for the petitioners. Tapas Ray, Anil B. Dewan, T.C. Roy, G.S. Chatterjee... | Section 4(1) of the West Bengal Rural Employment.
and Production Act, 1976 provided for levy of rural employment cess on immovable properties.
Clause (aa) of section 4(2) as amended by section 7(b) of the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amend ment) Act, 1981 provided for levy of rural employment cess in respect of tea estat... | Section 4(1) of the West Bengal Rural Employment. and Production Act, 1976 provided for levy of rural employment cess on immovable properties. Clause (aa) of section 4(2) as amended by section 7(b) of the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amend ment) Act, 1981 provided for levy of rural employment cess in respect of tea estat... | 0.799233 | 0.901363 | 0.400612 | 0.694669 |
"ON: Criminal Appeal No. 165 of 1957.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellants were tried before an Assistant Sessions judge for the offence of dacoity under secti(...TRUNCATED) | "ON: Criminal Appeal No. 165 of 1957.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the(...TRUNCATED) | "ON: Criminal Appeal No. 165 of 1957.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellants were tried before an Assistant Sessions judge for the offence of dacoity under secti(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellants were tried before an Assistant Sessions judge for the offence of dacoity under secti(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"ivil Appeal No. 103 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 19.4.1974 of the Patna High Court i(...TRUNCATED) | "For the year 1964 65, the assessee, a registered dealer, under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 return(...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 103 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 19.4.1974 of the Patna High Court i(...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 103 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 19.4.1974 of the Patna High Court i(...TRUNCATED) | "For the year 1964 65, the assessee, a registered dealer, under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 return(...TRUNCATED) | "For the year 1964 65, the assessee, a registered dealer, under the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1959 return(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"Petition Nos.\n1483, 1494 and 1544 of 1986 etc.\nUnder Article 32 of the Constitution of India.\nDr(...TRUNCATED) | "By a common order dated April 18, 1985 in C.A. No. 1423 of 1984, etc., Union of India vs Rajnikant (...TRUNCATED) | "Petition Nos.\n1483, 1494 and 1544 of 1986 etc.\nUnder Article 32 of the Constitution of India.\nDr(...TRUNCATED) | "Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. Dr: Y.S. Chitale, Satish Chandra, P.K. Banerjee, S.N(...TRUNCATED) | "By a common order dated April 18, 1985 in C.A. No. 1423 of 1984, etc., Union of India vs Rajnikant (...TRUNCATED) | "By a common order dated April 18, 1985 in C.A. No. Indeed, they give effect to the letter and spiri(...TRUNCATED) | 0.267608 | 0.608163 | 0.174163 | 0.543086 |
"ivil Appeal No. 2027 of 1974.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 8.10.1973 of the Gujarat High Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "Under a deed of partnership dated 12.11.1958, a firm by the name M/s. Chhotalal Vedilal came into e(...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 2027 of 1974.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 8.10.1973 of the Gujarat High Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 2027 of 1974.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 8.10.1973 of the Gujarat High Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "Under a deed of partnership dated 12.11.1958, a firm by the name M/s. Chhotalal Vedilal came into e(...TRUNCATED) | "Under a deed of partnership dated 12.11.1958, a firm by the name M/s. Chhotalal Vedilal came into e(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"ON: Civil Appeal No. 1777 of 1973.\nFrom the Judgment and Decree dated 25.6.1973 of the Karnataka H(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent company had a current account with the lant bank in its Mangalore Builder Branch.\nT(...TRUNCATED) | "ON: Civil Appeal No. 1777 of 1973.\nFrom the Judgment and Decree dated 25.6.1973 of the Karnataka H(...TRUNCATED) | "From the Judgment and Decree dated 25.6.1973 of the Karnataka High Court in Regular First Appeal No(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent company had a current account with the lant bank in its Mangalore Builder Branch.\nT(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent company had a current account with the lant bank in its Mangalore Builder Branch. th(...TRUNCATED) | 0.142538 | 0.511035 | 0.173831 | 0.539028 |
"ivil Appeal No. 544 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 20.8.\n1973 of the Gujarat High Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent challenged the notice for reasessment issued under section 147(b) of the Income Tax (...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 544 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 20.8.\n1973 of the Gujarat High Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "ivil Appeal No. 544 of 1975.\nFrom the Judgment and Order dated 20.8.\n1973 of the Gujarat High Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent challenged the notice for reasessment issued under section 147(b) of the Income Tax (...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent challenged the notice for reasessment issued under section 147(b) of the Income Tax (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
"Appeal No. 25 of 1961.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated November 26, 195(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent, who owned agricultural properties in the different districts of Uttar Pradesh, was (...TRUNCATED) | "Appeal No. 25 of 1961.\nAppeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated November 26, 195(...TRUNCATED) | "Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated November 26, 1957, of the Allahabad High(...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent, who owned agricultural properties in the different districts of Uttar Pradesh, was (...TRUNCATED) | "The respondent, who owned agricultural properties in the different districts of Uttar Pradesh, was (...TRUNCATED) | 0.175634 | 0.538948 | 1 | 1 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 6