judgement stringlengths 23.1k 740k | summary stringlengths 1.3k 73.4k | original_judgment stringlengths 23.1k 740k | processed_judgment stringlengths 4.22k 19.7k | original_summary stringlengths 1.3k 73.4k | processed_summary stringlengths 1.3k 4.5k | judgment_bleu float64 0 0.41 | judgment_rouge float64 0.05 0.69 | summary_bleu float64 0 1 | summary_rouge float64 0.1 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vil Appeal Nos.
2839 40 of 1989 etc.
From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.
1984 of the Delhi High Court in R.F.A. Nos. 113 and 114 of 1968.
K. Parasaran, Attorney General, T.S. Krishnamurthy Iyer, B.R.L. Iyengar, M.S. Gujaral, F.S. Nariman, A.K. Ganguli, K. Swamy, C.V. Subba Rao, R.D. Agrawala, P. Parmeshwaran, O.P. ... | A common question of law having arisen in this group of cases for determination by this Court, they were heard together.
Lands of Respondents in Civil Appeal Nos.
2839 40 of 1989 were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act.
The Collector made the award for compensation on March 30, 1963 and on a reference, being made ... | vil Appeal Nos.
2839 40 of 1989 etc.
From the Judgment and Order dated 6.12.
1984 of the Delhi High Court in R.F.A. Nos. 113 and 114 of 1968.
K. Parasaran, Attorney General, T.S. Krishnamurthy Iyer, B.R.L. Iyengar, M.S. Gujaral, F.S. Nariman, A.K. Ganguli, K. Swamy, C.V. Subba Rao, R.D. Agrawala, P. Parmeshwaran, O.P. ... | 1984 of the Delhi High Court in R.F.A. Nos. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATHAK, CJ. 8194 8195 of 1985: Union of India & Another vs Raghubir Singh. The respondents preferred an appeal to the High Court claiming further compensation. on 23 September, 1985, they referred to two earlier decisions of this Cou... | A common question of law having arisen in this group of cases for determination by this Court, they were heard together.
Lands of Respondents in Civil Appeal Nos.
2839 40 of 1989 were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act.
The Collector made the award for compensation on March 30, 1963 and on a reference, being made ... | A common question of law having arisen in this group of cases for determination by this Court, they were heard together. Lands of Respondents in Civil Appeal Nos. The Respondents appealed to the High Court seeking further enhancement. The matter initially came up before a Division Bench on September 23, 1985. The Bench... | 0.039027 | 0.382603 | 0.070179 | 0.422548 |
"ION: Civil Appeal No. 3054 of 1987.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 20.2.\n1987 of the Allahabad(...TRUNCATED) | "% The appellant, a State Government enterprise, on or about May 17, 1983, entered into a contract w(...TRUNCATED) | "ION: Civil Appeal No. 3054 of 1987.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 20.2.\n1987 of the Allahabad(...TRUNCATED) | "1987 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Revision No. A.B. Diwan, Sandeep Narain and Shri Narain f(...TRUNCATED) | "% The appellant, a State Government enterprise, on or about May 17, 1983, entered into a contract w(...TRUNCATED) | "% The appellant, a State Government enterprise, on or about May 17, 1983, entered into a contract w(...TRUNCATED) | 0.026364 | 0.35656 | 0.136447 | 0.505282 |
"Civil Appeal No. 3072 of 1980 etc.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 5.\n10.1979 of the Allahabad (...TRUNCATED) | "% Controversies relating to the seniority of the officers in the Indian Forest Service (I.F.S., for(...TRUNCATED) | "Civil Appeal No. 3072 of 1980 etc.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 5.\n10.1979 of the Allahabad (...TRUNCATED) | "10.1979 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. S.N. Kacker, C.P. Lal, M.N. Krishnamani, Dalip T(...TRUNCATED) | "% Controversies relating to the seniority of the officers in the Indian Forest Service (I.F.S., for(...TRUNCATED) | "% Controversies relating to the seniority of the officers in the Indian Forest Service (I.F.S., for(...TRUNCATED) | 0.003091 | 0.258079 | 0.012071 | 0.313374 |
"Civil Appeal No. 1576 of 1987 From the Judgment and order dated 13.1.1987 of the Punjab and Haryana(...TRUNCATED) | "% The defendant respondent No. 1, Ram Prakash as Karta of a Joint Hindu Family executed an agreemen(...TRUNCATED) | "Civil Appeal No. 1576 of 1987 From the Judgment and order dated 13.1.1987 of the Punjab and Haryana(...TRUNCATED) | "1576 of 1987 From the Judgment and order dated 13.1.1987 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in R.(...TRUNCATED) | "% The defendant respondent No. 1, Ram Prakash as Karta of a Joint Hindu Family executed an agreemen(...TRUNCATED) | "1, Ram Prakash as Karta of a Joint Hindu Family executed an agreement to sell the suit property and(...TRUNCATED) | 0.315404 | 0.639211 | 0.043226 | 0.391346 |
"N: Criminal Appeal Nos.\n642 656 of 1987.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 24.4.1987 of the High (...TRUNCATED) | "% The facts and issues involved in all these appeals were similar.\nCriminal Appeals Nos.\n644 45.8(...TRUNCATED) | "N: Criminal Appeal Nos.\n642 656 of 1987.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 24.4.1987 of the High (...TRUNCATED) | "From the Judgment and order dated 24.4.1987 of the High Court of Bombay in Criminal Appeal Nos. 495(...TRUNCATED) | "% The facts and issues involved in all these appeals were similar.\nCriminal Appeals Nos.\n644 45.8(...TRUNCATED) | "% The facts and issues involved in all these appeals were similar. 3 and 4, i.e. the Charterer Comp(...TRUNCATED) | 0.139212 | 0.507774 | 0.032432 | 0.369316 |
"ition No. 801 of 1986 & Etc.\n(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) K. Parasaran, Attorne(...TRUNCATED) | "These writ Petitions have been filed by the employees of the Supreme Court through their Welfare As(...TRUNCATED) | "ition No. 801 of 1986 & Etc.\n(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) K. Parasaran, Attorne(...TRUNCATED) | "(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) K. Parasaran, Attorney General, B. Dutta, Additiona(...TRUNCATED) | "These writ Petitions have been filed by the employees of the Supreme Court through their Welfare As(...TRUNCATED) | "These writ Petitions have been filed by the employees of the Supreme Court through their Welfare As(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000193 | 0.191792 | 0.073311 | 0.442985 |
"Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4826 of 1987 etc.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 6.4.1987 of(...TRUNCATED) | "% What fell for consideration in all these matters, viz., (i) SLPs.\n(civil) Nos. 4826 and 7045 of (...TRUNCATED) | "Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 4826 of 1987 etc.\nFrom the Judgment and order dated 6.4.1987 of(...TRUNCATED) | "From the Judgment and order dated 6.4.1987 of the Allahabad High Court in C.M.A. No. K. Parasaran, (...TRUNCATED) | "% What fell for consideration in all these matters, viz., (i) SLPs.\n(civil) Nos. 4826 and 7045 of (...TRUNCATED) | "% What fell for consideration in all these matters, viz., ( 1 and Administrative Block, Civil Lines(...TRUNCATED) | 0.006139 | 0.285664 | 0.001618 | 0.241146 |
"Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Agnihotri,Amrendra Singh,Anil\nCounsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advoc(...TRUNCATED) | "The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) recently upheld the life sentence awarded to three murder (...TRUNCATED) | "Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Agnihotri,Amrendra Singh,Anil\nCounsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advoc(...TRUNCATED) | "Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Agnihotri,Amrendra Singh,Anil\nCounsel for Respondent :- Govt. Saraf(...TRUNCATED) | "The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) recently upheld the life sentence awarded to three murder (...TRUNCATED) | "The Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) recently upheld the life sentence awarded to three murder (...TRUNCATED) | 0.005602 | 0.278764 | 0.51689 | 0.750504 |
"1& vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0&700\nlu~ 2019] vUr(...TRUNCATED) | "In a huge relief to Dr. Kafeel Khan, the Allahabad High Court today quashed the entire criminal pro(...TRUNCATED) | "1& vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0&700\nlu~ 2019] vUr(...TRUNCATED) | "State of Madhya Pradesh 1999 (1) SCC 728 esa\nizfrikfnr fof/k O;oLFkk ds izLrj 2 dh vksj U;k;ky; dk(...TRUNCATED) | "In a huge relief to Dr. Kafeel Khan, the Allahabad High Court today quashed the entire criminal pro(...TRUNCATED) | "In a huge relief to Dr. Kafeel Khan, the Allahabad High Court today quashed the entire criminal pro(...TRUNCATED) | 0.011573 | 0.303868 | 0.615086 | 0.813536 |
"This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for\nquashing of FIR No.236 dated 15.09.2021(...TRUNCATED) | "The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that if a second FIR is registered regarding an incident(...TRUNCATED) | "This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for\nquashing of FIR No.236 dated 15.09.2021(...TRUNCATED) | "This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted(...TRUNCATED) | "The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that if a second FIR is registered regarding an incident(...TRUNCATED) | "The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that if a second FIR is registered regarding an incident(...TRUNCATED) | 0.000381 | 0.204261 | 0.222152 | 0.571575 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 6